Understanding the Self 1
Understanding the Self 1
• According to Plato, true knowledge comes from the rational soul's pursuit of
truth and virtue, while irrational appetites can lead to ignorance and moral
corruption.
• Plato is a dualist; there is both immaterial mind (soul) and material body, and
it is the soul that knows the forms. It is the soul that apprehends the forms,
existing both before birth and after death. Plato asserts that the soul, rather than
the body, is the locus of true knowledge, as it transcends the limitations of the
senses.
PLATO
The soul (mind) itself is divided into 3 parts: reason; appetite (physical urges);
will (emotion, passion, spirit.)
• The will is the source of love, anger, indignation, ambition, aggression, etc.
When these aspects are not in harmony, we experience mental conflict.
The will can be on the side of either reason or the appetites. We might be
pulled by lustful appetite, or the rational desire to find a good partner.
• To explain the interaction of these 3 parts of the self, Plato uses the image
is of the charioteer (reason) who tries to control horses representing will
and appetites. Elsewhere he says that reason uses the will to control the
appetites.
ARISTOTLE
• He believed that the self is a harmonious integration of various faculties,
reason, emotion, and perception.
• He advocated for eudaimonia, or flourishing, achieved through the balanced
development of these faculties.
• Self-awareness is vital for moral and intellectual growth, enabling individuals
to understand their strengths and weaknesses.
• Aristotle defined the soul as the essence of a living being but argued against
its having a separate existence.
• For instance, if a knife had a soul, the act of cutting would be that soul,
because 'cutting' is the essence of what it is to be a knife. The soul is an
activity of the body, it cannot be immortal (when a knife is destroyed, the
cutting stops). For Aristotle, "humans have bodies for rational activity," and
the potential for rational activity thus constituted the essence of a human soul.
St. Augustine
• Augustine integrated Christian theology with philosophical inquiry to explore
the nature of the self.
• He viewed the self as flawed due to original sin, a consequence of Adam and
Eve's disobedience, but capable of redemption through divine grace.
Another example is, imagine a high school student is preparing for a talent
show. He imagines how others will perceive their singing and stage performance. If he
believes others will see them as talented and confident, his self-esteem is high.
Positive feedback during the show reinforces boosting confidence further. However, if
he imagines negative perceptions or receives critical feedback, self-esteem may
decrease. This shows how the looking-glass self affects self-perception based on
imagined and actual social feedback.
Three activities develop the self:
2. Play develops self by allowing individuals to take on different roles, pretend, and
express expectation of others. Play develops one's self-consciousness through role-
playing. During role-play, a person is able to internalize the perspective of others and
develop an understanding of how others feel about themselves and others in a variety of
social situations.
3. Games develop self by allowing individuals to understand and adhere to the rules of
the activity. Self is developed by understanding that there are rules in which one must
abide by in order to win the game or be successful at an activity.
Mead's theory of the social self is based on the perspective that the self
emerges from social interactions, such as observing and interacting with
others, responding to others' opinions about oneself, and internalizing
external opinions and internal feelings about oneself.
Mead develops William James' distinction between the "I" and the "me." The
"me" is the accumulated understanding of "the generalized other" i.e. how one
thinks one's group perceives oneself etc. The "I" is the individual's impulses.
The "I" is self as subject; the "me" is self as object. The "I" is the knower; the
"me" is the known. For Mead the thinking process is the internalized
dialogue between the "I" and the "me."
The "I" is the response of an individual to the attitudes of others, while the
"me" is the organized set of attitudes of others which an individual assumes.
Thank you!