Advanced iOS 4 Programming Developing Mobile Applications for Apple iPhone iPad and iPod touch 1st Edition Maher Ali - Get the ebook instantly with just one click
Advanced iOS 4 Programming Developing Mobile Applications for Apple iPhone iPad and iPod touch 1st Edition Maher Ali - Get the ebook instantly with just one click
com
https://ebookname.com/product/advanced-ios-4-programming-
developing-mobile-applications-for-apple-iphone-ipad-and-
ipod-touch-1st-edition-maher-ali/
OR CLICK HERE
DOWLOAD EBOOK
https://ebookname.com/product/ios-6-programming-pushing-the-
limits-advanced-application-development-for-apple-iphone-ipad-
and-ipod-touch-1st-edition-rob-napier/
https://ebookname.com/product/ios-4-programming-cookbook-
solutions-examples-for-iphone-ipad-and-ipod-touch-apps-1st-
edition-vandad-nahavandipoor/
https://ebookname.com/product/ios-forensic-analysis-for-iphone-
ipad-and-ipod-touch-1st-edition-sean-morrissey/
https://ebookname.com/product/an-introduction-to-english-
phonetics-3rd-edition-richard-ogden/
English Inversion A Ground before Figure Construction
Rong Chen
https://ebookname.com/product/english-inversion-a-ground-before-
figure-construction-rong-chen/
https://ebookname.com/product/christian-physicalism-
philosophical-theological-criticisms-r-keith-loftin/
https://ebookname.com/product/100-things-jets-fans-should-know-
do-before-they-die-bill-chastain/
https://ebookname.com/product/financial-analysis-a-controller-s-
guide-2nd-edition-steven-m-bragg/
https://ebookname.com/product/an-introduction-to-proof-through-
real-analysis-1st-edition-daniel-j-madden/
Finite Element Analysis of Solids and Structures 1st
Edition Sudip S. Bhattacharjee
https://ebookname.com/product/finite-element-analysis-of-solids-
and-structures-1st-edition-sudip-s-bhattacharjee/
Advanced iOS 4
Programming: Developing
Mobile Applications for
Apple iPhone, iPad,
and iPod touch
Registered office
John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, United Kingdom
Editorial office
John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, United Kingdom
For details of our global editorial offices, for customer services and for information about how to apply for permission to
reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com/wiley-blackwell.
The right of the author to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright,
Designs and Patents Act 1988.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or
by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright,
Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher.
Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in print may not be available in
electronic books.
Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks. All brand names and product
names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The
publisher is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book. This publication is designed to provide
accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is sold on the understanding that the
publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services. If professional advice or other expert assistance is required, the
services of a competent professional should be sought.
Trademarks: Wiley and the Wiley Publishing logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of John Wiley and Sons, Inc. and/
or its affiliates in the United States and/or other countries, and may not be used without written permission. iPhone, iPad and
iPod are trademarks of Apple Computer, Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Wiley
Publishing, Inc. is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in the book. This book is not endorsed by Apple
Computer, Inc.
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
Preface xiv
1 Getting Started 1
1.1 iOS SDK and IDE Basics 1
1.1.1 Obtaining and installing the SDK 1
1.1.2 Creating a project 1
1.1.3 Familiarizing yourself with the IDE 3
1.1.4 Looking closely at the generated code 4
1.2 Creating Interfaces 6
1.2.1 Interface Builder 6
1.2.2 Revising the application 9
1.3 Using the Debugger 14
1.4 Getting More Information 16
1.5 Summary 17
Exercises 18
2.5 Categories 36
2.6 Posing 37
2.7 Exceptions and Errors 38
2.7.1 Exceptions 38
2.7.2 Errors 42
2.8 Key-Value Coding (KVC) 44
2.8.1 An example illustrating KVC 45
2.8.2 KVC in action 46
2.9 Multithreading 51
2.10 Notifications 54
2.11 Blocks 56
2.11.1 Declaration and definition 56
2.11.2 Block literal 57
2.11.3 Invocation 57
2.11.4 Variable binding 58
2.12 Grand Central Dispatch (GCD) 59
2.12.1 Queues 59
2.12.2 Scheduling a task 60
2.12.3 Putting it together 60
2.13 The Objective-C Runtime 61
2.13.1 Required header files 62
2.13.2 The NSObject class 62
2.13.3 Objective-C methods 63
2.13.4 Examples 66
2.14 Summary 82
Exercises 83
3 Collections 87
3.1 Arrays 87
3.1.1 Immutable copy 89
3.1.2 Mutable copy 91
3.1.3 Deep copy 93
3.1.4 Sorting an array 96
3.2 Sets 101
3.2.1 Immutable sets 101
3.2.2 Mutable sets 102
3.2.3 Additional important methods for NSSet 104
3.3 Dictionaries 104
3.4 Summary 106
Exercises 107
6 Controls 161
6.1 The Foundation of All Controls 161
6.1.1 UIControl attributes 161
6.1.2 Target-action mechanism 162
6.2 The Text Field 165
6.2.1 Interacting with the keyboard 167
6.2.2 The delegate 170
6.2.3 Creating and working with a UITextField 171
6.3 Sliders 172
6.4 Switches 173
6.5 Buttons 174
6.6 Segmented Controls 175
6.7 Page Controls 178
6.8 Date Pickers 179
vi Contents
15 Internationalization 439
15.1 String Localization 439
15.2 Date Formatting 445
15.3 Number Formatting 448
15.4 Sorted List of Countries 450
15.5 Summary 451
Exercises 451
Index 673
Another Random Document on
Scribd Without Any Related Topics
decline, or, it may be, because, after a while, sexual intercourse becomes less
frequent, or because precautions against procreation are taken.
The number of children to which during the three decades of her sexual life,
from the menarche to the menopause, a woman might theoretically give birth,
is never actually born. If we assume that, during the period of active sexual
life, a woman requires a period of fifteen months to two years for each
pregnancy, parturition, and lactation, a woman could easily during this period
have fifteen or sixteen children, and this figure would represent the normal
product of the normal fertility of the human female. There are indeed, women
who, it may be in consequence of an exceptionally long period of sexual
activity, or through giving birth repeatedly to twins or triplets, or because they
have married several husbands in succession, have given birth to twenty-four
children or even more. In Berlin, in the year 1901, there lived a woman 41
years of age who had had 23 children; there were three women, aged
respectively 40, 43, and 46 years, who had had each 21 children; 246 women
with families numbering 13 to 20; and 169 women each of whom had given
birth to 12 children. In the very great majority of cases, however, the fertility of
the wife of the present day is never fully developed. It is modified in various
ways by the conditions of marriage, by social circumstances, by considerations
relating to the health of husband or wife, by actual illnesses, and by voluntary
limitation of fertility. Generally speaking, according to the investigations of
Quetelet, Sadler, and Finlayson, the fertility of women is greatest in marriages
in which the husband is as old as the wife, or a little older, but without marked
difference in age. Marriages contracted at a very early age are less fruitful; the
highest fertility is found in marriages contracted when the husband is 23 and
the wife 26 years of age.
Conception does not generally take place until sexual intercourse has been
frequently repeated. As the result of a statistical enquiry of my own, relating to
556 fruitful marriages, I ascertained that in these the first delivery occurred:
Within 10 months after marriage in 156 cases.
Within 11 to 15 months after marriage in 199 cases.
Within 16 to 24 months after marriage in 115 cases.
Within 2 to 3 years after marriage in 60 cases.
More than 3 years after marriage in 26 cases.
Thus we learn that in 35.5% of the cases the first delivery occurred within
1¼ years after marriage; in 15.6% within 10 months; and in 19.9% within 15
months after marriage; and 11.5% of the cases, the first delivery was more
than 1¼ years and less than 2 years after marriage; in 6.0% it was between 2
and 3 years after marriage; and in 2.6%, the first delivery did not occur until
more than 3 years after marriage.
From examination of the birth registers of Edinburgh and Glasgow, Matthews
Duncan determined the mean interval between marriage and the birth of a
living child to be seventeen months. In the majority of cases, the first delivery
does not occur until a complete year has elapsed since marriage; in fact, in
nearly two-thirds of the instances the first delivery occurs during the second
year of married life.
The interval between two successive births is, according to Matthews
Duncan, on the average 18 to 24 months, according to Goehlert, 24 to 26
months; the latter, however, points out that in cases in which the child dies
very soon after birth, the birth of the next child ensues on the average in 16 to
18 months. In this connection, we must not fail to take into consideration the
influence of lactation, inasmuch as mothers who do not suckle their children
become pregnant considerably earlier, on the average, than those who
undertake this duty. In reigning families, for instance, it is by no means
uncommon for the consort to be delivered twice within a single year. The
degree to which lactation hinders conception is so widely known, that women
often suckle their infant for a very long period, with the definite aim of
preventing the speedy recurrence of pregnancy. A high official from the Dutch
Indies informed me that for this reason the native women were accustomed to
suckle their infants for several years, and that it was by no means uncommon
to see a small boy running about smoking a cigar, and then hurrying to his
mother in order to be suckled.
The age at which a woman contracts marriage has also to this extent an
influence upon her fertility, inasmuch as it appears that those who marry very
young are far less fertile than those who marry between the ages of 20 and 25
years; the latter moreover have, on the average, a shorter time to wait for
their first conception than women who marry before the age of 20. Women
who marry after the age of 25 have to wait longer after marriage for their first
delivery; in fact the older the woman after 25, the greater, on the average, the
interval between marriage and the first delivery.
Arranging the data already referred to, regarding 556 fruitful women, in
relation to this point of view, it appears that the first birth ensued:
15
Within months More
10 10 to 15 to 2 2 to 3 than 3
months months years years years
of after after after after
marriage. marriage. marriage. marriage. marriage.
In 163 women marrying at
ages 15 to 20 years 36 53 46 18 10
In 313 women marrying at
ages 20 to 25 years 98 113 56 32 14
In 70 women marrying at
ages 25 to 33 years 18 30 12 9 1
In 10 women marrying at
ages over 33 years 4 3 1 1 1
To give percentages, the first birth occurred,
15
Within months More
10 10 to 15 to 2 2 to 3 than 3
months months years years years
of after after after after
marriage. marriage. marriage. marriage. marriage.
Women marrying at ages
15 to 20 years, in 22.0% 32.5% 28.2% 11.0% 8.1%
Women marrying at ages
20 to 25 years, in 31.3% 36.1% 17.8% 10.2% 4.4%
Women marrying at ages
25 to 33 years, in 25.7% 42.8% 17.1% 12.8% 1.4%
Women marrying at ages
over 33 years, in 40.0% 30.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0%
Thus whereas in women who contracted marriage between the ages of 15
and 20 years, only 54.5% were confined for the first time within 15 months
after marriage, in women who contracted marriage between the ages of 20
and 25 years, in 67.4% the first delivery occurred within 15 months of
marriage. And whereas in those who married at the earlier age, the percentage
of first deliveries occurring between 15 months and 2 years after marriage was
28.2, in those who married between the ages of 20 and 25, the percentage of
first deliveries after the stated interval was only 17.8.
The figures compiled by Whitehead and Pfannkuch give similar results. Of
700 women who married between the ages of 15 to 20 years, there were 306
only who gave birth to a child within the first two years after marriage;
whereas of 1,835 women who married between the ages of 20 and 25 years,
no less than 1,661 gave birth to a child within two years after marriage—a
percentage of 43.7 in the former case, and 90.6 in the latter case. Pfannkuch,
as the result of a very large collection of figures relating to this question, found
that in women marrying before the age of 20 years, the average number of
months before the first delivery was 26; whereas in women marrying after the
age of 20 years, the average number of months before the first delivery was
20.
According to Matthews Duncan
Of Every 100 Women Who There Become Mothers
Marry In the 1st year of In the 2d year of married
married life. life.
Between the ages of 15 and 20
years 13.71 43.70
Between the ages of 20 and 25
years 18.48 90.51
Between the ages of 25 and 30
years 12.41 75.80
Between the ages of 30 and 35
years 11.44 62.93
Between the ages of 35 and 40
years 9.27 40.97
Sadler examined the relationship between the age at which marriage was
contracted and the number of offspring in the case of the wives of English
peers. He obtained the following results:
From these figures it appears that the maximum fertility of married women is
attained, in Denmark at the age of 31, in Norway at the age of 31.7, and in
Sweden at the age of 32 years. In the case of unmarried women, the
maximum fertility is at the ages of 24 to 26 years. In the Austrian Empire, the
maximum fertility of women is attained at about the age of 30 years; in
England it is attained between the ages of 20 and 25 years.
Divergent results as regards the fertility of married women at different ages
were obtained by Goehlert from the examination of 5,290 cases from the
reigning families of Europe. In the favourable position as regards means of
subsistence occupied by the members of these families, marriage naturally
occurs, in most cases, much earlier in life, the mean age at marriage being
between 19 and 22 years—the youngest mother (in the Capet dynasty) was
only 13 years of age—and for this reason the figures relating to the younger
age-classes are larger than in the previous tables. But as a result of this, the
reproductive capacity also undergoes an earlier extinction, so that of these
women, not one gave birth to a child when she was over 50 years of age.
Goehlert gives the following table, compiled from these 5,290 instances:
In these cases the maximum fertility was obtained at the age of 27.
The physiological fertility of women is much more clearly manifested when
we compare the fertility of women who have been married a few years only,
with the fertility of women in the later years of married life. In the earlier
period, the effective fertility more nearly approaches the physiological fertility,
because at this time the various influences by means of which fertility is later
so greatly diminished have not yet come into operation. In this connection the
following data, published by Körösi, regarding the percentage fertility of
recently married women, and that of married women in general, will be found
of interest:
Recently-married women. All married women.
At ages 20 to 35 years. 32.9% 20.6%
At ages 35 to 40 years. 32.7% 14.7%
At ages 40 to 45 years. 21.4% 5.9%
Inasmuch as we learn from this table that in the case of women aged 40 and
upward, the newly married exhibit a fertility of four times as great as that of
married women in general, in whom pregnancy has already become rare, we
can infer the influence upon fertility of abstinence and of artificial measures for
the prevention of conception.
On the average, the maximum fertility of woman, that is, the maximum of
effective fertility, is attained at the age of 18 to 20 years. Extreme
youthfulness, and also the opposite condition, too advanced an age, when
marriage is entered on, impair a woman’s fertility; whereas the conditions most
favourable to fertility are that, at the time of marriage, the uterus should have
attained its fullest development, and the ovaries also should be completely
mature; this is not usually the case at puberty, but rather at the age of 20, 21,
or 22 years. In Austria-Hungary, of 100 marriages in which the wife’s age at
marriage was less than 18 years, the average offspring in the course of a
single year were 36 to 38 children; in the case of 100 marriages in which the
wife’s age at marriage was 18 to 20 years, the average offspring in a year were
40; this being the maximum fertility, the number of offspring in a year per
hundred marriages (i. e., the percentage fertility), now undergoes a regular
decline as the wife’s age at marriage increases; at an age of 25, the
percentage fertility is 32; at the age of 30 years, the fertility is 24%; at the age
of 35, 17%; at the age of 40 years barely 10%; at the age of 45, 7%; at ages
45 to 50, 0.1%. Thus, from the last figure, we see that of a thousand women
marrying at the age of 50 years, one only gives birth to a child. Men obtain
their maximum fertility (i. e., procreative capacity) at the age of 25 or 26 years;
at this age their fertility amounts to 35% (that is, of 100 marriages at this age,
35 children will on the average be born within a single year); at the age of 35
years, the percentage fertility of men falls to 23; at the age of 45 years, it is
9½%; at 55, 2.2%; at 65, ½% (Körösi-Blaschko).
Whereas hitherto we have considered only the monogenous fertility of
married women, we must remember that the figures relating to their
biogenous fertility are also of interest—that is to say, the changes which a
woman’s fertility experiences in married life in respect of the peculiarities of her
husband; and of these peculiarities, the easiest to make the object of statistical
investigation is the husband’s age. The age of the husband exercises an
important influence upon the fertility of the wife, as is proved by the following
figures published by Körösi:
Age of the Father. Age of the Mother.
25 years. 30 years. 35 years.
25 to 30 years 35.6% 25.0% 21.2%
30 to 35 years 31.2% 23.6% 19.9%
35 to 40 years 27.5% 21.8% 19.4%
40 to 45 years 16.7% 14.0%
45 to 50 years 14.4% 10.9%
50 to 55 years 10.9%
Also:
Age of the Age of the Father.
Mother. 25 years. 35 years. 45 years. 55 years.
Under 20 years 49.1%
20 to 25 years 43.0% 31.3% 16.0%
25 to 30 years 30.8% 27.3% 18.5%
30 to 35 years 33.5% 23.7% 14.4% 8.1%
35 to 40 years 18.9% 11.8% 6.7%
40 to 45 years 6.6% 6.1% 3.0%
We learn from these figures that the maximum fertility is exhibited by a
woman 18 years of age, when married to a man 25 years of age; less fertile is
a woman 25 to 30 years of age married to a man 28 years of age; still less
fertile is a woman 35 years of age married to a man 29 years of age. Neither
the age of the mother alone, nor that of the father alone, is determinative of
the fertility of the marriage, for the fertility of young wives married to elderly
husbands is quite different from that of young wives married to young
husbands. Very various age-combinations are possible, and each exhibits an
average fertility peculiar to itself.
We can also regard the question from the standpoint of the difference
between the ages of husband and wife respectively. In this connection, Körösi
is led by his tables to the conclusion that wives between the ages of 18 and 20
years attain their maximum fertility when married to men 7 years older than
themselves; women of 25 years when married to men 3 years older than
themselves; women of 29 years when married to men of the same age;
women of 30 years and upward attain their maximum fertility only when
married to men younger than themselves. Men, on the contrary, always attain
their maximum fertility when married to women younger than themselves. The
age of maximum fertility differs in the two sexes, and those marriages will be
most fruitful in which husband and wife are each of the age most favorable to
fertility. This will be the case when the age of the wife is 18 to 20 years, and
that of the husband 24 to 26 or perhaps 29 years.
In connection with the question of fertility, we have also to take into
consideration the vitality of the children born, that is, what proportion of those
born survive. According to Körösi’s interesting papers regarding the fertility of
the inhabitants of Buda-Pesth, we learn that for every 100 marriages which
have persisted for thirty years and upward, there were born, on the average,
539 children, of whom during this period 241 died, so that the percentage of
survivals was 55.28. Parents who have lost one only of several children must,
therefore, regard themselves as exceptionally favoured by fortune.
Social position, occupation, and religion, have, according to the last-quoted
author, a notable influence on fertility. His investigations showed that the
Roman Catholics and the Jews exhibited the greatest fertility; among the
Catholics there were 541 children, and among the Jews 557 children, per 100
marriages. Amongst 100 Protestant families, on the other hand, only 479
children had been born. It will be seen that the theory of the comparatively
enormous fertility of the Jewish race is not supported by these statistics. The
Jews do, however, exhibit a greater power of rearing children, for among them
the marriages of more than 30 years’ duration had 61⅔ % of the children still
living; among the Protestants 57¾% survived; and among the Catholics only
52–⅗%. It thus appears that the surviving offspring per 100 marriages of 30
years’ duration were, among the Catholics 278, among the Protestants 252,
and among the Jews 349.
The question whether, and to what extent, the age of the parents has an
influence on the vitality of the children, is answered by Körösi’s mortality
statistics in the sense that mothers below 20 years of age give birth to a larger
proportion of children deficient in vital power. Where the mothers had married
at the age of 16, the mortality of their offspring was, among Catholics 43%,
among Jews 33%; married at 17, Catholic mortality 44%, Jewish 30%; married
at 18, Catholic mortality 42%, Jewish 32%; married at 19, Catholic mortality
41%, Jewish 29%; married at 20, Catholic mortality 40%, Jewish 26%. Of the
children whose fathers had married at the age of 24, 32% had died; of those
whose fathers had married at 23, 37% had died; of those whose fathers had
married at 20, 42% had died; and of those whose fathers had married before
20, actually 44% had died. It thus appears that the children alike of very
young mothers and of very young fathers have a lessened chance of survival.
Inasmuch as the fertility of the wife is a product of two factors, her own
peculiar fertility, and that of the procreating male, the question of the fertility
of women cannot be accurately treated independently of this second
consideration; hereby, however, is introduced a multiplicity of obscure
combinations, by which the value of all the statistical data of fertility in women
is seriously impaired.
These data give as the measure of fertility, the number of children per
marriage actually brought up, embracing fruitful marriages, sterile marriages,
and those not yet fruitful. In Berlin, in Copenhagen, and in Buda-Pesth, the
average thus attained was slightly less than three births to each family, whilst
the number of children actually living averaged two per family. A more accurate
representation of fertility is obtained by ascertaining the number of children
born, and the number of children living in relation to the duration of marriages
reckoned in years, that is beginning with marriages of one year’s duration, and
proceeding year by year to the highest recorded duration of marriage. In this
way interesting statistics have been obtained; for example, one who has
completed thirty years of married life may count on the average that five or six
children will have been born to him, but may also reckon on having buried two
or three at least of these. (Körösi.)
Fertility is, as many facts indicate, also dependent on nutrition. A distinct
proof, says Spencer, writing on the “Coincidence between high Nutrition and
Genesis,” that abundant nutriment increases the number of births, and vice
versa, is found among the mammalia; compare, for instance, the litter of the
dog with that of the wolf and the fox. Whilst the dog’s litter numbers 6 to 14,
that of the wolf numbers 5 to 7, that of the fox 4 to 6. The wild cat gives birth
to 4 or 5 kittens once a year, the domesticated cat to 5 or 6, twice or thrice
annually. The most remarkable contrast, in this respect, exists between the
wild and the domesticated breeds of swine. The wild sow gives birth once a
year to a litter of 4, 8, or 10 pigs (the number increasing in successive litters);
the domesticated sow has often as many as 17 in a single litter, whilst in two
years five litters, each numbering 10 pigs, are commonly born.
Darwin also draws attention to the fact that animals under domestication,
being fed more abundantly and regularly than their wild allies, procreate at
shorter intervals and are markedly more fertile than the latter. He states that
the wild rabbit has four litters annually, each numbering 4 to 8 young; whereas
the tame rabbit reproduces its kind six to seven times annually, and gives birth
to litters numbering 4 to 11. Among birds, analogous phenomena are
observed. The wild duck, for instance, lays 5 to 10 eggs in the course of the
year, whereas the tame duck lays from 80 to 100; the wild grey goose lays 5 to
8 eggs, the domesticated goose 13 to 18.
It must be added that this exceptional fertility is manifested in animals that
are quite inactive in comparison with their wild allies; not only are they richly
fed, but they get their food without working for it. Moreover, it is easy to
observe that among the domesticated mammals the well-fed are more fertile
than the ill-fed.
That in the human species also, fertility is influenced to a notable degree by
nutritive conditions, is shown by statistical investigation. After years
distinguished by an exceptionally good harvest the number of children born is
considerably greater than in normal conditions; whereas after a famine the
opposite is observed. Malthus’s law of population states, inter alia, that the
population increases when the amount of available nutriment increases, that is,
that favourable nutritive conditions cause an increase, that unfavourable
nutritive conditions cause a decrease, of population. Hardships and exhausting
occupations diminish the fertility of women. The remarkable fertility of the
Kaffirs is referred to the fact that this people, possessing large herds of cattle,
lead a life comparatively free from care; it is no less true that the Boer women,
who lead a life of well-fed leisure, have very large families; whereas the
Hottentot women, poor, ill-nourished, and hard working, seldom bear more
than three children.
Generally speaking, it may be said that fertility of the soil, in connection with
an easily gained livelihood, favours also human fertility, notwithstanding the
fact that certain statistical data seem to conflict with this proposition. Sadler,
for instance, concludes that an increase in the price of the necessaries of life
does not per se check fertility, but, indeed, rather increases it; he considers
that the apparent decline in fertility is due to the fact that the number of
marriages diminishes, owing to the rise in prices. We must, however, point out,
that an increase in price of the necessaries of life is often associated with a rise
in wages, and is therefore not necessarily identified with deficient nutrition;
when, however, such a rise in prices leads to actual want, a limitation of
fertility will certainly result; this has been proved by Legoyt and Villermé with
regard to failure of the crops. Famine and disease lower the number of births;
a less severe deficiency of nutriment often lowers only the quality of those
born. Malthus was of opinion that the population of a country at any time was
related to the quantity of nutriment produced or imported therein, on the one
hand, and, on the other, to the liberality with which this nutriment was
distributed to the individual. In countries where corn forms the principal crop,
we find a thicker population than in pasture lands; and where rice is the
principal crop, the population is even more abundant than it is in corn growing
countries.
Passing to the consideration of the individual nutritive elements, we find that
these also influence fertility. Above all, it has been proved that alcohol notably
diminishes the fertility of women. Lippich states that of 100 women in Kärnten
and Krain suffering from chronic alcoholism, 28.3 were barren. In England,
where the abuse of alcoholic beverages is also very frequently observed in
women, the same phenomenon has been noted. Matthews Duncan held that
alcohol exercised a specific deleterious influence on fertility. Moreover, in
addition to the constitutional disturbances produced by the abuse of alcohol,
this beverage also exercises a well-known pathogenetic influence upon the
female reproductive organs; with especial frequency, chronic oöphoritis may be
shown to depend on this exciting cause.
A diet consisting mainly of fish is known to increase the sexual impulse, and
is said also to increase fertility. Further, a diet consisting mainly of potatoes or
rice is said to favour reproduction; compare, for instance, the fertility of the
Hindoos, who abstain entirely from animal food, and of the Chinese, who live
chiefly on rice. Davy maintained that the women of races living chiefly on fish
were handsomer and more fertile than others: and Montesquieu suggested
that there was an association between the abundant population of sea-ports
and also of Japan and China, and the large quantity of fish consumed in those
places. On the other hand, a diet consisting chiefly of meat is said to have an
unfavourable influence in this direction; in support of this view it is pointed out
that races living by the chase, and living therefore almost entirely on meat,
have very small families. This generalization is invalidated by the fact that
Englishwomen, who eat far more meat than the women of the Latin races, are
nevertheless distinguished by their great fertility.
In his “History of Civilisation in England” Buckle writes: “The population of a
country, although influenced by many other conditions, unquestionably rises
and falls in proportion as the supply of nutriment is abundant or the reverse.”
Herbert Spencer also states that “every increment in the supply of nutriment is
followed by an increment in fertility.”
It must not be forgotten that, in addition to the more or less abundant
supply of nutriment, there are always other influences affecting fertility; the
general mode of life, race, climatic conditions, etc., may, in various ways, co-
operate with or countervail the influence of nutritive conditions. If, with the
best possible supply of nutriment, there is associated a luxurious and
enervating mode of life, the abuse of alcohol, severe intellectual exertion, or
sexual excesses, the general result will be a diminution in fertility. And it is easy
to understand why Cros, although perhaps with little justification, goes so far
as to regard easy circumstances as an active cause of depopulation. “It is the
poor,” he writes, “and the less wealthy departments of France, in which we find
the most children.” In estimating fertility, however, we must never fail to take
into consideration the more extensive employment of means for the prevention
of pregnancy among the upper classes of society.
To a certain extent we can trace the influence of climate and of season upon
fertility. Heat appears to favour fertility; Haycraft’s figures for the eight largest
towns of Scotland show clearly how the number of conceptions rises and falls
pari passu with the temperature. Lower animals also, when brought from a
colder to a warmer neighbourhood, exhibit an earlier and more frequently
recurring “heat.” In Europe, however, the Northern races appear more fertile
than those of the south.
Of the seasons, spring is the one especially favourable to fertility. Quetelet,
who proves by numerous statistical data that the maximum of conceptions
occurs in May, attributes this fact to a general increase in the vital forces
occurring in spring, after the cold of winter. Villermé, however, goes back to the
older explanation, that the increase in the number of conceptions in May and
June is due to social and economic conditions. The return of spring, especially
the end of spring and the beginning of summer, a time of year in which the
means of subsistence are provided in exceptional quantity, and of especially
good quality, the season also of festivals and social reunion, when the two
sexes are brought into more intimate contact and when the majority of
marriages occur—these are the conditions associated with the season of
greatest fertility. The figures of Wappaeus also confirm the influence of spring
in favouring fertility. He found, however, that there were two seasons of
maximal fertility. The first at the end of spring and the beginning of summer;
the second in winter, especially in December. Mid-winter is for most people a
period of domestic amusement and relaxation, one of exceptionally good
nutrition, and of social reunion; the spring increase in fertility is a part of the
awakening and increase of the reproductive forces of nature at large, which
recurs every spring-time.
Every marked and sudden change in the mode of life has an unfavourable
influence on fertility. Darwin reports that mares who have for some time been
stall-fed with dry fodder and are then put out to grass are at first infertile after
the change. Europeans going to reside in the tropics experience a notable
decline in fertility as a result of the change of climate. According to Virchow,
the fertility of European women who become acclimatized in the tropics
declines very gradually, but in the course of a few generations is almost
completely annulled.
The marriage of near kin is believed also to diminish fertility. As regards
inbreeding in the lower animals, it is well known that when nearly related
animals copulate, the number of the offspring is below the average. Nathusius
paired a sow with its own uncle, the boar having proved productive in
intercourse with other sows; the litter numbered five to six only. This sow,
which belonged to the great Yorkshire race, was then paired with a small black
boar, which in intercourse with sows of its own variety had procreated litters
numbering six or seven; as a result of her first pairing with the black boar, the
sow cast a litter numbering twenty-one whilst the second attempt produced a
litter of eighteen. Similar results were obtained by Crampe, in his experiments
in the inbreeding of rats.
Some authorities declare that the results of inbreeding are similar in the
human species, that the marriages of near kin are less fruitful than the
average. Darwin writes in this connection: “With regard to human beings, the
question whether breeding in-and-in is also deleterious, will probably never
receive a direct answer, for man reproduces his kind so very slowly, and cannot
be made the object of experiment. The very general disinclination of nearly all
races to the marriage of near kin, which has existed from the very earliest
times, is of weight in relation to this question. Indeed we appear almost
justified in applying to the human race the experience gained by experiment on
the higher mammals.”
Darwin’s assumption regarding the effect upon fertility of the marriage of
near kin in the human species, cannot, however, be accepted without
qualification. In ancient times there was no uniformity of opinion on this topic.
It is well known that among the Phœnicians, a son might marry his mother,
and a father his daughter; and among the ancient Arabs it was the legal duty
of the son to marry his widowed mother. Moses, on the contrary, forbade
marriages between parents and children, between brothers and sisters, also
marriage with a father’s sister, with a wife’s mother, and with an uncle’s widow.
Darwin considered that the marriage of first cousins was not unfavourable to
fertility. Of 97 such marriages, 14 were sterile, whilst of 217 marriages of those
not akin, 35 were sterile; the percentage in both cases being almost identical.
Mantegazza, who regards kinship in marriage as unfavourable to fertility, found
nevertheless that among 512 marriages of near kin, only 8 to 9% were sterile.
It is widely believed that the dying out of many aristocratic families is
dependent on the inbreeding so common in this class—but it must be admitted
that scientific evidence in support of this belief is lacking. Incest in the human
species may certainly result in fertilization. Among the Jews, marriages of near
kin are very common, and often prove extremely fruitful.
Göhlert made a statistical investigation of the fertility of the reigning families
of Europe, in order to throw light on this question. In the Capet dynasty, 118
marriages of near kin took place, and of these 41 were sterile; in the Wettin
dynasty (Saxony), there were 28 such marriages, of which 7 were sterile, and
1 produced one child only; in the Wittelsbach dynasty (Bavaria), 29 such
marriages, of which 9 were sterile, and 3 produced only one child each. Thus
of 175 marriages of near kin, 57, or 32.6% remained sterile. Further, in the
Habsburg-Lothringen dynasty, of 110 marriages, 25 were marriages of near
kin, and of these 33% remained sterile.
It has been assumed since the days of antiquity that temperament and
constitution exercise some influence on fertility. Hippocrates, Soranus, and
Diokles, are among the ancient authors who refer to this matter. Soranus says
very justly: “Since most marriages are contracted, not from love, but for the
procreation of children, it is irrational, when choosing a wife, to have regard,
not to her probable fruitfulness, but instead of this to the social position and
the wealth of her parents.”
It would appear that a certain dissimilarity in physical constitution and
temperament between husband and wife is favourable to the fertility of the
marriage. For instance, a vivacious, dark husband, and a lethargic, fair wife,
are better suited to one another than a husband and wife both extremely
active, or both of extremely phlegmatic temperament.
Toussaint Loua published the following figures regarding the fertility of the
women of the various countries of Europe:
Fertility of Women Between the Ages of 15
Number of births per and 45 Years.
Country.
hundred inhabitants.
Married. Unmarried. Average.
Hungary 4.94 17.8
Russia 4.12 20.5
Austria 3.93 16.4
Germany 3.77 34.8 2.9 17.7
Italy 3.67 28.8 2.4 16.1
Holland 3.67 35.3 1.0 16.0
Finland 3.63 15.8
England 3.58 29.7 1.6 15.5
Scotland 3.53 32.8 2.5 15.8
Belgium 3.25 33.7 1.8 14.8
Denmark 3.12 28.5 2.8 14.4
Roumania 3.12 13.5
Norway 3.10 29.3 2.2 14.0
Sweden 3.05 29.1 2.5 13.7
Switzerland 3.04 29.7 1.1 13.1
Greece 2.96 13.2
Ireland 2.69 29.8 0.5 12.3
France 2.63 20.3 1.8 11.6
In towns, conjugal fertility is less, extra-conjugal fertility greater, than in the
country. An increase in factory labour gives rise to an increase in the
population, but to a decline in the vitality of the offspring; that is to say, it
causes a quantitative increase, and a qualitative decrease, in fertility. An
increase in agricultural labour has precisely the opposite effect. The influence
of war upon fertility is unfavourable both quantitatively, and qualitatively.
According to Tschouriloff, the introduction of universal military service, by
withdrawing for a time all the most vigorous men from domestic life, tends to
diminish fertility. Extensive emigration from a country in which the soil is fertile,
and where the vital conditions are generally favourable, is stated by Bertillon to
cause an increased fertility in the mother country; he further states that an
increase in the number of the proprietors of the soil is followed by diminished
fertility, and vice versa.
Prostitutes show as a rule a very low fertility. According to the data of
Tarnowskaja, the fertility of prostitutes in Russia is 34%, whilst married women
of similar ages in Russia exhibit a fertility of 51.8%. Gurrieri found 60% of
prostitutes childless.
The fertility of female criminals was found by Lombroso to be undiminished.
On the average, poisoners had given birth to 4.5 children, other murderesses
to 3.2 children, child-murderesses to 2 children; thus the prisoners whose
crime is commonly dependent on an abnormal eroticism had a fertility above
the average.
The diminished fertility of prostitutes depends in part upon frequent venereal
infection, in part upon the unfavourable influence of the mercury and iodide of
potassium administered for the cure of such infection, also upon the frequency
with which they consume excessive quantities of alcohol, upon the excessive
frequency of coitus, which exercises a traumatic influence, upon the irregular
mode of life, and upon their disinclination to be burdened with children.
Conjugal fertility, that is to say, the ratio between legitimate births and the
number of married women between the ages of 15 and 50 years, has declined
in Germany during the last decades. It was:
This decline is small, but it is much more manifest in urban than in rural
districts. This fact is shown by the following figures, relating to fertility in
Prussia:
1872 to 1879. 1894 to 1897.
In all towns 26.9 24.0
In Berlin 23.8 16.9
In other large towns 26.7 23.5
In rural districts 28.8 29.0
This difference depends principally on the fact that in the large towns of
Germany (and still more in those of France) the use of means for the
prevention of pregnancy is continually increasing, whereas the population of
the rural districts is as yet less familiar with the use of these measures.
According to Hellstenius, conjugal fertility, that is, the number of children per
married couple, is as follows:
In Prussia 4.11
England 4.10
Belgium 4.12
France 2.09
In various States of the American Union 2.5 to 3.0
From the Almanach de Gotha Vacher obtained figures showing that each
family of the higher aristocracy has on the average the following number of
children.
In France 2.0
Italy 3.0
Germany 4.8
England 4.9
Russia 5.1
To what an extent in all times, and among all peoples, the fertility of women
was esteemed, is shown by religious writings and traditional customs which
aimed at enabling a wife who had had no children by her own husband, to
seek other conjugal embraces. Among the Jews, it was the duty of a man to
marry his widowed and childless sister-in-law; if he were unwilling or unable to
perform this duty he was compelled to take a part in a ritual termed “chaliza,”
in which his foot was bared and the bereaved woman spat upon him, because
he was unwilling to maintain his brother’s house. In the law book of the
Hindoos of Manus, we read, “If husband and wife have no children, it is proper
for them to obtain the desired offspring by a union between the wife and the
husband’s brother, or some other relative;” the child obtained in this way was
legally regarded as the child of the husband. Confucius wrote: “If your wife is
barren, take a second wife; she must be subordinate to the first wife, for her
only duty is the bearing of children.” An analogy to this ordinance is to be
found in the Bible; Abraham’s barren wife Sarai says to Abraham: “Behold now,
the Lord has restrained me from bearing: I pray thee, go in unto my maid; it
may be that I may obtain children by her. And Abraham hearkened unto the
voice of Sarai.” In the same way the barren Rachel speaks to her husband
Jacob, “Behold my maid Billah, go in unto her; and she shall bear upon my
knees, that I may also have children by her.”
Luther, in his treatise on marital love published in the year 1522, bases,
doubtless on the above biblical precedents, the following statement regarding
fertility: “If a sexually potent woman is married to an impotent man, if she is
unable to take any other man openly, yet is unwilling to do anything
dishonourable, she should say to her husband, “Dear husband, you cannot
fulfil your duty to me, and you have deceived my young body, you have
endangered my honour and my happiness, and in the eye of God our marriage
is null, forgive me therefore if I form a secret union with your brother or with
your nearest friend; the fruit of this union will be yours in name, thus your
possessions will not fall to strangers, and you will willingly allow me to deceive
you, because involuntarily you have deceived me.””
In ethnography, the term endogamy is used to denote a law or custom by
which marriage is allowed only within the limits of a specified race, tribe, or
caste; thus, in the Old Testament, Jews are forbidden to marry women of other
races. The ethnographical term exogamy indicates the prohibition of marriage
between persons who are more closely allied, as, for instance, the Mosaic
prohibition of marriage within certain degrees of blood-relationship. Such
exogamic prohibitions persist even in the legislation of the present day. In
many ecclesiastical and national laws we find the marriage of first cousins and
of uncle or aunt with niece or nephew forbidden; and even a prohibition of the
marriage of a man with his deceased wife’s sister.
Hegar considers the danger of inbreeding to be very great in the human
species; for whereas in the lower animals breeders employ a methodical and
carefully considered selection of the best specimens, nothing of this kind
occurs among human beings; and the health of modern civilized man is such
that there are few families without a skeleton in the closet. “Not only in
families, but also in villages, in small and large towns, even in classes, and in
entire nations, certain peculiar qualities, morbid tendencies, and
predispositions, are handed down from generation to generation. We have, for
instance, the tendency of the Jews to nervous disorders and diabetes, that of
the English to gout, that of the Germans to myopia.” Strahan has therefore
employed the term “social consanguinity,” to indicate that by means of
common customs, environment, occupation, and mode of nutrition, a similarity
in type is produced, leading to a similar predisposition to disorders and
diseases transmissible from father to son.
The dangers of inbreeding are believed by Hegar to be, under present-day
conditions, so considerable that he would allow the marriage of near kin in
exceptional cases only, and where the circumstances are peculiarly favourable
—for instance, where both parties to the projected marriage are in excellent
health, and where there is no great similarity between them in feature or
mental type. Certain anomalies transmitted from remote ancestors, dependent
on deeply-marked peculiarities of the germ cells, may be so developed by
inbreeding as to become absolutely fixed characteristics. If the morbid
manifestations can be traced back for several generations, if the bodily defects
and disturbances of development (the so-called stigmata of degeneration), are
well marked and numerous, if the functional disorders of the nervous system
and of the sense organs are pronounced, leading to idiocy, insanity, epilepsy,
congenital deafmutism, blindness, instinctive criminality,—there is in such cases
little or no hope of the regeneration of the family. It dies out, because the
members are sterile; because they are confined in prisons or asylums; or
because the children, if any are born, are deficient in vitality, and fail to reach
maturity.
According to the brief summary of the subject given by Hegar, the
peculiarities of the offspring at the time of birth depend upon:
Factors which give rise to peculiarities of the germ-cells:
I. Germinal rudiments derived from the ancestors;
II. Influences acting on the germ-cells within the parent organism;
a. Owing to peculiarities of the fluids and tissues of the parental body;
b. Owing to substances which penetrate the parental body and reach the germ.
Germinal rudiments altered by the conjugation of the male and female
reproductive cells:
I. On the mother’s side;
a. Owing to peculiarities of the fluids and tissues of the maternal body;
b. Owing to substances which penetrate the maternal organism and reach the fertilized
ovum.
II. On the father’s side, owing to substances which adhere to the paternal
reproductive cells, or are enclosed within these.
The number of consanguineous marriages at the present day is not less than
5½ to 6½ per 1,000; the fertility of these marriages appears to be identical
with the fertility of ordinary marriages. Mayet has made a statistical
investigation to determine the influence of consanguineous marriages in the
pathogenesis of mental disease. He finds that the number of those congenitally
affected with mental disorder is twice as great in the offspring of
consanguineous marriages as in the offspring of crossed marriages; in the case
of simple mental disorder, of paralytic dementia, and of epileptic dementia, the
ratio is actually greater than two to one (the actual figures are 218, 257, 208 :
100). Thus we see that when there exists any cause of inheritable mental
disorder, blood-relationship of the parents more than doubles the danger to the
children. In the case of imbecility and idiocy the danger is less in this respect
(the ratio is 150 : 100); the factor of inheritance plays a less prominent part
than in the case of other psychoses.
It was remarkable that among the offspring of marriages of nephew and
aunt, cases of mental disorder were almost entirely lacking. Among the
offspring of marriages of uncle and niece, the inheritance of mental disorder
was more prominent than among the children of first cousins. It is interesting
to determine the influence of blood-relationship in cases in which the existence
of inheritable predisposition could not be proved. In these cases, as regards
simple insanity, paralytic dementia, and epileptic dementia, the number of
cases among the offspring of consanguineous marriages was only one-half as
compared with the offspring of crossed marriages; whereas in the case of
imbecility and idiocy this ratio was reversed. In idiocy, where inheritance
generally speaking plays a small part, the origination of the disease would
often appear to depend directly on the blood-relationship of the parents; whilst
as regards other forms of mental disorder, if there is no inheritable
predisposition, blood relationship in the parents appears to be a positive
advantage; where, however, a family predisposition to insanity exists the
likelihood of actual insanity appearing in the offspring is notably enhanced by a
consanguineous marriage.
The Restriction of Fertility and the Use of Means for the Prevention of
Pregnancy.
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
ebookname.com