Mooring Design & Mooring Analysis in India
Mooring Design & Mooring Analysis in India
Our naval architects and consultants utilize best industry practices to provide solutions for mooring
analysis such as spread mooring and single point mooring systems, which includes turrets, CALMs,
SALMs, towers, submerged buoys, and more. We have vast experience in mooring consultation of harbor
and jetty moorings, ships, Barges,accommodation vessels small ships, and for various other offshore
structure
We are able to analyze frequency and fully coupled, time domain mooring analysis for floating
vessels, FPSOs and FSOs
• Spread mooring
• Semi-Submersible Platforms
• Drill ships
• Accommodation vessels
• SPARs
Our engineers are capable of RAO calculation through industry renowned FEM packages which will be
further utilized to calculate vessel motion and mooring requirement.
MOORING SERVICES
• Pile/Anchor Specification
Inertia
Moments of inertia are assessed using the estimated gyration radii of the vessel,
Roll inertia radius,
Pitch and Yaw inertia radii,
weight, m = displacement
Inertia is then considered as follow:
The calculation of roll motion is a key point of any ship motion calculations. It is governed by the roll
damping, which is caused by two main contributions:
The wave radiation (linear) and the viscous effects on the hull (quadratic) for sea-keeping analysis
Add an additional quadratic viscous damping (BQ)
With:
Cd is quadratic damping coefficient (equal to 0.05 for this barge without a bilge keel),
ρ is sea water density (equal to 1025 kg/m3),
B is the breadth of the vessel,
L is the length of the vessel.
Additional linear damping can be calculated by BUREAU VERITAS formula for spread moored vessel:
It should be noted that Maxx, Mayy, Maψψ are the diagonal terms of the asymptotic added mass matrix
of the vessel. And Koxx, Koyy, Koψψ are the diagonal terms of the mooring stiffness matrix [Ko]
evaluated at the average position of the vessel.
Wind loads can be calculated with wind tunnel test, API RP 2SK guidelines etc.Projected area and wind
force application point are required for wind force determination.
The steady state force (for bow or beam environment) due to wind acting on a moored floating unit can
be determined using following Equation,
Fw = Cw × Σ (Cs×Ch×A) ×Vw²
Where:
Fw = wind force, lbs (N),
Cw = 0.0034 lb/(ft² • kt²) (0.615 N• sec²/m4)
Cs = shape coefficient,
Ch = height coefficient,
A = vertical projected area of each surface exposed to the wind, ft² (m²),
Vw = design and speed, knots (m/sec).
Wind shielding in accordance with acceptable methods shall be considered as per API RP 2SK guidelines.
For API method,The equations presented are convenient for calculating wind and current forces for bow
and beam environments. For environments approaching from an oblique direction, Equation is used to
evaluate wind forces.
Where,
= force due to oblique environment, lbs (N),
= force on the bow due to a bow environment, lbs (N),
= force on the beam due to a beam environment, lbs (N),
= direction of approaching environment (degrees off bow).
Current Load
The main characteristics of the mooring wire ropes like Number of Lines, Length on Each
Drum,Diameter,Weight in Air, Weight Submerged, Axial Stiffness and MBL etc shall be defined.
Anchor Data
Anchor arrangement and holding capacity in soft or hard clay shall be defined.
Mooring Winches
Mooring winch location, pull capacity on different layers, MBL etc shall be defined.
Wave Model
Wave is modeled with JONSWAP spectrum using significant wave height Hs, the peak period Tp, and the
shape parameter Gamma.
Operating waves
For the operating position significant wave height range of that particular month or period shall be used.
Each Hs shall be allocated three Tp based on the Noble Denton guidelines. Gamma can be used as 3.3.
Extreme waves
Based on the operational periods, the monthly extreme value at field location shall be used which can be
extracted from metocean report. The Tp used for standoff position shall be taken with margin i.e as +/-
30% of the associated Tp of monthly extreme value.
Analysis Methodology
Capabilities of the mooring system shall be computed using quasi-dynamic simulations of the vessel and
the mooring system under combination of wind, wave and current environmental loads. Simulations
shall consider combining wave frequency and low frequency responses of the system to get the
maximum vessel motions and mooring line tensions.
Simulations shall performed for 3 hours duration environments. “Quasi-dynamic analysis” is performed,
meaning that full dynamic motion of the vessel is considered but line tensions are estimated from vessel
dynamic motions with static restoring curves.
The low frequency motion shall be computed in time domain while the wave frequency motion shall be
calculated in frequency domain. The global dynamic motion is the superposition of the low frequency
motion and the wave frequency motion, the stiffness shall be computed for the sum of the WF and LF
motion.
Hydrodynamic Analysis
Diffraction radiation method evaluates hydrodynamic loads on a structure, submitted to regular waves
and enables to get accurate RAOs operation of the vessel. Newman Approximation shall be considered
for consideration of shallow water effects on drift loads.
The maximum allowable operational environmental conditions shall be estimated for each
environmental direction assuming Wind and current are applied collinear to the wave direction and
Directions are considered as coming from 0 to 337.5 deg and every equal intervals are screened.
Design Criteria
All mooring system criteria are majorly checked against the requirements of API RP 2SK, Design and
Analysis of Station Keeping Systems for Floating Structures .
The tension in the mooring lines shall be checked against API RP 2SK requirements. The tension must
therefore remain lower than:
50% of the MBL under intact condition
70% of the MBL under damage condition
The maximum tensions in the mooring lines shall be lower than the winch brake capacity of mooring
winches at first layer .
The maximum tension in the mooring line shall be lower than ultimate holding capacity of that particular
type of anchor in specified ground conditions.
Anchor Uplift
No uplift at the anchor shall occur under intact condition. This criterion shall not be considered for
damaged conditions (one line failure).Anchor uplift is checked against class requirements.Vertical load at
the anchor should remain less than 20% of anchor’s wet weight.
Barge Clearance with Existing Facilities
The minimum horizontal clearance between barge and existing offshore structures shall shall be
specified for intact and damage conditions.
For mooring line, a minimum horizontal clearance of 10m shall remain under intact condition and a
minimum clearance of 3m with mooring line will be considered under damaged conditions.
Minimum vertical clearance of 15m shall be considered between mooring lines and existing pipelines for
all the range of tension from allowable environments.
If midline buoys are installed, the vertical force should not exceed 70% of the buoyancy capacity to
ensure visibility.
Normally FPSO are hooked-up at ballast draft, with level trim. Based on ballast draft loading condition,
the final pretension of the mooring lines shall be set to calibrated 10 to 15% of mooring chain MBL. With
such pretension at ballast draft, lower pretension will be found for the “100% loaded” loading condition.
A minimum three tugs are recommended for the hook-up operations. An additional Installation vessel is
used to install the mooring lines.
A bare minimum of two tugs are required to hold FPSO position on site, typically the two of the ocean
tugs used for towing. However, a safe minimum of three tugs shall be used for hook-up. An additional
Installation vessel is required to support during the hook-up operations.
The positioning tugs and assisting installation vessel are arranged in following way
Lead tugs, tied to the bow of the FPSO Stern tugs, tied to the stern of the FPSO Support installation
vessel, located on site to support the hook-up operation.
Lead tugs are used to tow the FPSO to site, while the stern tugs are used to stabilize the FPSO fishtailing
during sailing and installation.
Installation Vessels used on site to recover the chains and ensure the connection of the chains with the
FPSO.
The line hook-up procedure would be repeated for next set of middle lines .These Mooring lines also
shall be re-adjusted to get the final pretensions. In this way, The line hook-up procedure would be
repeated for next set of lines. So basic is that starting from inner most lines tugs shall work on next set of
lines. At the end of this stage, all mooring lines are connected. Once all the mooring lines are connected
and tensioned, adjustment of the mooring line tension shall be performed to get the correct positioning
of the FPSO (midship location, riser porch location and FPSO heading). The following sequence is to be
used to hook-up each mooring lines to the FPSO.
Retrieve mooring line end using the subsea or pennant buoy (at the line end location). Chain end is
recovered and locked onto the installation vessel. Buoys and pennant wires are stored on AHT deck
Moves towards FPSO stern corner, relocating the line up to fairlead of mooring line. Installation vessel
shall (with the end of the chain) move as close as possible towards FPSO, so that it will have minimum
distance from the appropriate fairlead. Meanwhile on the FPSO, mooring wire and winch sockets are
prepared and connected to fairlead. The mooring wire shall be placed through the chain stopper (open)
and stored into the chain chute. At the end of the mooring wire, A messenger line is attached to the
socket. Once the installation vessel close to the FPSO, the synthetic rope (messenger line) free end is
sent to the installation vessel (while the other end remains attached to the socket). Once the messenger
line is connected to a winch on the installation vessel, the mooring wire is paid-out from the mooring
winch through the chain stopper and fairleads; and the synthetic rope in paid-in from the AHT to guide
the open spelter socket from the FPSO to the installation vessel. Once the socket at end of the mooring
wire is on-board the AHT deck, the open spelter socket is connected to the last chain link. Once the chain
has passed 15 links inside the chain stopper, chain stopper shall be closed and messenger line shall be
retrieved which is ready to be used onto the next line. Then the chain stopper shall be opened and the
mooring winch is used to set the chain at 50% of final pretension.
Tugs Requirements
The tugs used for the hook-up operations are usually the same the one used for the towing operation.
Towing is usually designing but in any case, following requirements are needed for the Lead and Stern
Tugs.Bollard pulls of tugs are calculated based on the force required to keep the FPSO in position with
only two lines connected in specified wave heights, wind and current load in beam and quartering
directions.
Installation Vessel
Positioning Tolerances
The positioning of the FPSO using above equipment shall be as follow:
FPSO horizontal position tolerance is a box with +/-5m sides from reference point FPSO heading
tolerance is +/-2 deg from reference heading, with a maximum accuracy of +/- 0.5 deg
Tensions Tolerance
The chain angle accuracy shall be measure with accuracy of 0.5 deg. If ROV assistance is used, the
distance from fairleads to TDP shall be measured with an accuracy of 5m.Tension calculation using above
measurements shall be +/- 5MT from recommended pretension.
FPSO Preparation
Prior to FPSO entering the field, a dedicated rigging team will board the vessel to make final preparations
for the hook-up works.
The Tow Master will be in overall charge in Positioning of the FPSO, he will liaise closely with the Clients
Offshore Installation Manager to instruct the different tugboats for the approach and to hold the FPSO in
position during the hookup.
Mooring winches shall be used for the tensioning of the mooring chain legs. Chain angle measurement
gauge shall be prepared.For the hookup operation, synthetic ropes and appropriate equipment will be
prepared on deck at the fore and aft bundles of the FPSO. All safety equipment shall be as per SOLAS
specification, National Regulation and International applicable standards mooring hookup.
3D panel method is best suited to determine the added mass and radiation damping of structures, as
well as waves loads in finite depth : Stokes 1st order loads (Froude-Krylov terms), diffracted wave loads.
Wave periods between 3 to 50 seconds shall be studied from 0° to 360° with a 10° heading step.The first
order motions shall be computed in the frequency domain.
Roll motion is governed by the roll damping, which mainly depends on wave radiation and viscous effects
on the hull. For sea-keeping analyses, the standard procedure is to model these two components of roll
damping as the sum of linear term accounting for the wave radiation damping and additional viscous
damping is added using the Ikeda-Tanaka-Himeno formulas, including eddy making, friction, lift and the
contribution of bilge keels.
Stochastic linearization is considered one of the most accurate methods of linearization of damping
quadratic term because it iterates on roll velocity standard deviation to adapt linearized damping to
environmental conditions.
Methodology
A full time domain analysis is used. “Quasi-dynamic analysis” means that lines tensions are estimated
from FPSO dynamic motions but with quasi-static restoring load curve.The low frequency motion is
computed from a time domain simulation of 3 hours duration, the wave frequency motions are then
added from the linear RAO (computed from a frequency domain simulation). The stiffness is computed
for the sum of the wave frequency and low frequency motion.
The Newman approximation can be considered to calculate non-linear second order wave loads. This
approximation is considered valid for shallow water depth and maximum draft. However a sensitivity
analysis on one case shall be performed using Full QTF matrix.
• Viscous / drag loads on the hull provides major contribution to the low frequency damping for all
the motions. Estimation is derived from a standard linear formulation (ITTC).
• Damping from mooring lines dynamic: shallow water combined with semi-taut mooring and
limited FPSO motions leads to small contributions to the total damping
• Wave drift damping is also rather small because wave height and low frequency motions are
reduced. Then influence of current on wave drift damping is also neglected.
• Seabed effects : motions on the mooring lines close to the seabed are too limited to induce
friction effects leading to low frequency damping
Then a resulting global linear component has been introduced in the low frequency simulations with
different values for surge, sway and yaw.
The associated levels of damping correspond to 3% of the critical damping in surge and sway, and 5% in
yaw.
Extreme weather data shall be provided for every regular azimuth angle. Wind, wave and current are
considered collinear and environments are then applied at every step.
Damaged conditions
In order to predict the maximum offset, cases having the most loaded line for each bundle of mooring
lines shall be considered broken. In order to predict the maximum tension, another case where the
second most loaded line considered broken is added.
Transient conditions
For the intact cases where the maximum tensions occur (one case per FPSO loading), transient analyses
are performed in order to quantify the transient effect of one-line failure.
The simulation to be selected should satisfy the following criteria:
• The maximum tension is the closest to its design tension in intact conditions, and
• The maximum occurs while the low frequency component of the tension is increasing.
If the second criterion is not met, the selection procedure should be resumed with the highest second
maximum in the same simulation.
Using the same sets of Airy waves and wind simulations can be repeated. During these simulations, the
line should be broken at different times equally distributed between the two instants identified.
The time series of six D.O.F FPSO motions will be imposed concurrently with the wave and current effect
onto the mooring line. The analysis will be carried out in the range of the times that cover the maximum
line tension and FPSO motions.
The two FPSO loading conditions in the intact and damage cases will be considered.
Sensitivity Analyses
Additional cases will be performed to check the sensitivity of the mooring system in response to the
slight variation conditions as shown below.
Anchor installation tolerances Sensitivity
Sensitivity analyses are carried out in intact condition only. The following anchor installation tolerance is
carried out:
At the bundle where the maximum tension is found, sensitivity is performed using the worst
environment set.
Sensitivity analysis on the two worst cases for each of the 100% and 10% Loaded Conditions will be
performed using Full QTF matrix. This is to compare against the same cases where Newman
approximation is considered.
Hs / Tp Sensitivity
+/- 1s of Tp will be the sensitivity case to investigate the effects of the mooring system due to changes in
Tp and Hs. It will be tested only for the cases that lead to maximum line tension for both 100% and 10%
Loaded Conditions.
Non-Collinear Sensitivity
For the cases that lead to maximum line tension for both 100% and 10% Loaded Conditions, variation of
the wind and current direction from the wave direction shall be considered.To investigate the effect of
the mooring system due to non collinear environment. These conditions shall be considered
1. With wind @ -30° from waves and current @ +45° from waves.
2. With wind @ +30° from waves and current @ -45° from waves.
3. With wind @ -45° from waves and current @ +30° from wave.
4. With wind @ +45° from waves and current @ -30° from waves.
Offset Sensitivity
+/- 1s of Tp will be the sensitivity case to investigate the effect to the mooring system due to changes in
Tp. It will be tested only for the cases that lead to maximum offset for both 100% and 10% Loaded
Conditions.