MARKS SPLIT UP FOR THE FIRST REVIEW – 18CSP109L/18CSP111L PROJECT

#R1 : Rubrics for Review 1

Maximum Marks: 15
PI Excellent Good Average Poor
PI Marks
Code (15-13) (12-9) (8-5) (4-0)
Demonstrates an
exceptional ability to
Effectively identifies Demonstrates basic Struggles to identify
analyse and solve
and analyses problem-solving and solve
Apply engineering fundamentals- engineering
1.6.1 2 problems, providing skills but may lack engineering
GA problems. Applies
well-reasoned depth or creativity. problems effectively.
creative and
solutions. (1.5) (1) (0.5)
innovative solutions.
(2)
Thoroughly identifies Effectively identifies
Identifies some Inadequate ability to
and articulates all and explains most
processes, modules, identify and
relevant processes, relevant processes,
Identify and algorithms, but articulate processes,
modules, and modules, and
processes/modules/algorithms of a may miss key modules, and
2.5.2 3 algorithms. algorithms.
computer-based system and components. Shows a algorithms. Lacks a
Demonstrates a deep Demonstrates a solid
parameters to solve a problem-GA basic understanding clear understanding
understanding of the understanding of the
of the system's of the system's
system's architecture. system's structure.
structure. (2) structure. (1)
(3) (2.5)
Demonstrates
exceptional creativity Effectively explores
Explores some design Struggles to generate
and innovation in creative design
alternatives but may creative design
Able to explore design exploring a wide alternatives,
3.6.1 3 lack creativity or fail alternatives, resulting
alternatives. -IA range of design demonstrating a good
to consider a diverse in limited innovation.
alternatives, showing balance of innovation
range of options. (2) (1)
originality and and practicality. (2.5)
inventiveness. (3)
 Presents content with Communicates
Communicates Struggles to convey
exceptional clarity, content adequately
content clearly, content clearly,
Deliver effective oral presentations ensuring both but may require
making it accessible leading to confusion
10.5.2 to technical and non-technical 2 technical and non- additional
to both technical and for both technical
audiences-IA technical audiences clarification for non-
non-technical and non-technical
can easily understand technical audiences.
audiences. (1.5) audiences. (0.5)
complex concepts. (2) (1)

Create flow in a document or Exceptional ability to Strong ability to Adequate ability with Inadequate ability to
presentation - a logical progression create flow with a create flow with room for create flow with a
10.4.3 2
of ideas so that the main point is logical progression of effective organization improvement in logical progression
clear-GA ideas. (2) and transitions. (1.5) creating flow. (1) of ideas. (0.5)

Exceptional
Adequate teamwork Inadequate teamwork
Present results as a team, with teamwork and Strong teamwork and
with room for and insufficient
smooth integration of integration of effective integration
9.6.1 2 improvement in integration of
contributions from all individual individual of individual
integrating individual individual
efforts -GA contributions in the contributions. (1.5)
contributions. (1) contributions. (0.5)
presentation. (2)
Exceptional
Fails to integrate the
understanding of the Inadequate
technical, socio-
Understand the relationship relationship between Strong understanding understanding with
economic, and
between the technical, socio- technical, socio- with effective room for
7.3.2 1 environmental
economic and environmental economic, and integration of at least improvement in
dimensions, resulting
dimensions of sustainability - GA environmental two dimensions. (1) integrating
in a fragmented
dimensions of dimensions (0)
understanding. (0)
sustainability. (1)

GA – Group Assessment IA – Individual Assessment

Marks specified in the brackets are the maximum marks that can be gained if the student satisfy the relevant descriptor.
 MARKS SPLIT UP FOR THE SECOND REVIEW – 18CSP109L/18CSP111L -PROJECT
#R2 : Rubrics for Review 2
Maximum Marks: 20
PI Excellent Good Average Poor
PI Marks
Code (20-16) (15-11) (10-6) (5-0)
Demonstrates Meets expectations Shows satisfactory Falls short of
Design and develop exceptional quality and with a high level of performance but with expectations, significant
appropriate exceeds expectations in competence in room for improvement improvements needed in
4.5.1 procedures/methodolo 3 Design and develop Design and develop in Design and develop Design and develop
gies based on the study appropriate appropriate appropriate appropriate
objectives-IA procedures/methodolog procedures/methodol procedures/methodolo procedures/methodologi
ies (3) ogies. (2) gies (1.5) es (0.5)
Demonstrates an
outstanding ability to Meets expectations Displays an adequate Fails to meet the
choose appropriate with a high level of understanding in minimum expectations.
Able to choose
procedures/algorithms, competence. Makes choosing appropriate Choices of procedures/
appropriate
datasets, and test cases. effective choices of procedure/algorithm, algorithms, datasets, and
4.4.2 procedure/algorithm, 3
Exceeds expectations procedures/algorithm dataset and test cases, test cases are entirely
dataset and test
by consistently making s, datasets, and test though there is inappropriate, and
cases.
well-informed, strategic cases, providing potential for justifications are absent
decisions with clear clear reasoning. (2) enhancement. (1.5) or flawed.(0.5)
justifications. (3)
Identify the strengths
and limitations of
Demonstrates
tools for (i) Shows a solid
exceptional Identifies strengths
acquiring understanding, with unable to accurately
understanding, and limitations with
5.5.1 information, (ii) 3 clear recognition of identify strengths and
accurately identifies some gaps or
modelling and strengths and limitations (0.5)
strengths and inaccuracies (1)
simulating, (iii) limitations. (2)
limitations. (3)
monitoring system
performance, and
 (iv) creating
engineering designs.

Presents content with

Communicates content
exceptional clarity, Communicates content Struggles to convey
Deliver effective oral clearly, making it
ensuring both technical adequately but may content clearly, leading to
10.5. presentations to accessible to both
2 and non-technical require additional confusion for both
2 technical and non- technical and non-
audiences can easily clarification for non- technical and non-
technical audiences-IA technical audiences.
understand complex technical audiences. (1) technical audiences. (0.5)
(1.5)
concepts. (2)
Interpret legislation,
regulations, codes, Effectively identifies
Identifies and followed
and standards Accurately identifies and followed coding Fails to identify and
coding and
relevant to your and followed coding and documentation followed coding and
documentation
6.4.1 discipline and 4 and documentation standards, documentation standards
standards but with
explain its standards relevant to demonstrating a relevant to the discipline
some omissions or
contribution to the the discipline (4) good understanding (1)
inaccuracies (2)
protection of the (3.5)
public
Analyse sourced
Strongly Analysed Analysed feasibility, Analysed feasibility,
technical and
feasibility, viability, viability, viability, sustainability
12.6. popular information Low level analysis
5 sustainability of sustainability of of technical
2 for feasibility, happened(2)
technical technical information but not
viability,
information(5) information(4) proper(3)
sustainability, etc.

GA – Group Assessment IA – Individual Assessment

Marks specified in the brackets are the maximum marks that can be gained if the student satisfy the relevant descriptor.
 MARKS SPLIT UP FOR THE THIRD REVIEW – 18CSP109L/18CSP111L -PROJECT
#R3 : Rubrics for Review 3
Maximum Marks: 25
PI Excellent Good Average Poor
PI Marks
Code (25-20) (19-13) (12-6) (5-0)

The conclusions are Conclusions are

Arrive at Conclusions are clear and Conclusions are
exceptionally clear, generally clear but
conclusions with directly linked to the unclear, vague, or not
2.8.4 3 concise, and directly tied may lack some
respect to the majority of objectives. effectively tied to the
to the stated objectives specificity related to
objectives. (2.5) objectives. (1)
(3) the objectives.(2)

Discuss Discussed limitations Discussed limitations

Discussed limitations Discussed limitations and
limitations and and validated tools, and validated tools,
and validated tools, validated tools,
5.6.1 validate tools, 5 techniques and techniques and
techniques and resources techniques and
techniques and resources with resources inadequate
in strong extend(5) resources(4)
resources limited level.(3) level(2)

Demonstrates an Selects generally Uses inappropriate or

Use appropriate Uses a good selection of
exceptional selection of appropriate ineffective
procedures, tools appropriate procedures,
appropriate procedures, procedures, tools, procedures, tools, and
4.6.1 and techniques to 3 tools, and techniques for
tools, and techniques for and techniques for techniques for data
collect and data collection and
data collection and data collection and collection and
analyse data analysis. (2.5)
analysis.(3) analysis. (2) analysis.(1)
The team presents The team presents The team struggles to
Present results as The team presents results
results seamlessly, with results with an present results
a team, with with a well-structured and
a highly organized and acceptable level of cohesively, lacking a
smooth organized approach.
cohesive structure. Each organization and clear and organized
9.6.1 integration of 4 Individual contributions
team member's structure. Individual structure. Individual
contributions are integrated effectively,
contributions are contributions are contributions are
from all showcasing a good
integrated smoothly, integrated poorly integrated,
individual efforts understanding of the
demonstrating a deep adequately, but there leading to confusion
 understanding of the project's collective may be some minor or disjointed
overall project. (4) efforts.(3) disruptions in the presentation.(1)
flow.(2)

Presents content with Communicates

Struggles to convey
Deliver effective exceptional clarity, Communicates content content adequately
content clearly,
oral presentations ensuring both technical clearly, making it but may require
leading to confusion
10.5.2 to technical and 3 and non-technical accessible to both additional
for both technical and
non-technical audiences can easily technical and non- clarification for non-
non-technical
audiences-IA understand complex technical audiences. (2.5) technical audiences.
audiences. (1)
concepts. (3) (2)
Analyse and
select the most selected the most The selection process The selection process
Selected the suitable
appropriate appropriate proposal is justified to a basic is poorly justified,
proposal based on
11.5.1 proposal based on 2 based on economic and extent, with attention with insufficient
economic and financial
economic and financial to some important attention to financial
considerations.(1.5)
financial considerations.(2) financial aspects.(1) aspects.(0.5)
considerations.
Moral & ethical
Moral & ethical Moral & ethical principles Moral & ethical
Examine and principles were
principles were were Examined and principles were
8.4.2 apply moral & 5 Examined and
Examined and applied in applied in satisfactory Examined and
ethical principles applied are not
adequate level (5) level (4) applied (3)
sufficient (2)

GA – Group Assessment IA – Individual Assessment

Marks specified in the brackets are the maximum marks that can be gained if the student satisfy the relevant descriptor.
 18CSP109L/18CSP111L PROJECT - Project Report Evaluation

Rubric #R4 : Project Report Evaluation

Maximum Marks : 20
PI Performance Criteria Marks Excellent (20-16) Good (15-11) Average (10-6) poor (5-0)

Excellent organization
Inappropriate content
Organization of enhances readability Content appropriate to Some content placed
2 of several sections of
the Report and/or understandability all section of report. incorrectly in report.
report.
of report.
Project report is Project report is not Project report is not
Project report is according
Report Format 1 according to the completely according to prepared according to
to the specified format
specified format. the specified format. the specified format.
Grammatical and
10.4.2 5
Sentences are grammatical Sentences are spelling errors make
Sentences are mostly
1 and free from spelling grammatical and free it difficult for the
grammatical and few
Grammar, errors. from spelling errors. reader to Interpret the
Citations and text in places.
References References and citations References and
References and
are appropriate and well citations are not Insufficient references
1 citations are not
mentioned as per the appropriate as per the and citations.
appropriate.
format format.
Complete explanation of
Complete explanation Inappropriate
the key concepts but
Complete explanation of of the key concepts explanation of the
little relevance to
Description of the key concepts and and In-sufficient key concepts and
literature and In-
10.4.3 Concepts and 10 5 Strong description of the description of the Poor description of
sufficient description of
Technical Details technical requirements of technical the technical
the technical
the project requirements of the requirements of the
requirements of the
project. project.
project.
 Results are presented clear Results are presented
Results presented are not Results are not
and complete. Clearly in good manner.
Results and much satisfactory. presented properly.
follow report discussion, Interpretation of
Discussion with 5 Interpretation of results Project results is not
meaningful results is appropriate
Conclusion and conclusion not very summarized and
recommendations and and conclusion is
appropriate. concluded.
conclusions unclear
Diagrams are not
Diagrams enhance the Diagrams clarify the Diagrams are presented presented well and do
Use of standard
3 clarity and presentation of presentation of the but do not clarify the not clarify the
figures,
the idea. idea. presentation of the idea. presentation of the
Tables and
idea.
10.6.1 diagrams to 5
Tables and figures are Tables and figures are No proper use of
complement the Limited Tables and
consistent with the text consistent with the tables and figures that
content of the figures that are not well
2 that covers all aspects of text that covers most are related to the
report related to specifications
the specifications and of the specifications specification of the
of the project.
appropriate to the project. of the project. project.
 18CSP109L/18CSP111L PROJECT End Semester Evaluation
Rubric #R5 : Viva -voce(External)
Maximum Marks : 30

PI Level of Achievement
PI Marks
code Excellent (30-23) Good (22-16) Average (15-9) Poor (8-0)

Objectives are not

Evaluate problem
Problem statement and Problem statement is appropriate with Problem statement
2.5.1 statements and
5 objectives are clearly defined and objectives respect to the and objectives are
identifies objectives-
defined. (5) are not clear (3.5) problem not clear. (1.5)
GA
statement.(2.5)
i) Not able to
i) Able to identify i) Able to identify i) Able to identify
Arrive at identify suitable
suitable solution suitable solution solution
2.8.4 conclusions with solution
5 ii) Conclusions are most ii) Conclusions are not ii) Conclusions are
respect to the ii) Conclusions are
appropriate to the most appropriate to the not appropriate to the
objectives- GA not appropriate to
objectives(5) objectives (3.5) objectives (2.5)
the objectives (1.5)
Use appropriate i) Able to use i) Able to perform i) Not able to
i) Able to follow
procedures, tools appropriate experiments but not identify proper
standard methodology
5.6.1 and techniques to methodology and able to follow methodology and
5 and tools
conduct experiments modern tools methodology tools
ii) Able to collect
and collect data-GA ii) Able to collect and ii) Not able to collect ii) Not able to
data (4)
+IA validate data (5) appropriate data (3) collect data (2)
Able to implement i) Techniques and tools i) Techniques and i) Techniques and
i) Techniques and
4.6.1 and demonstrate the are applied to the tools are applied to the tools are applied to
7 tools are not
modules using acceptable level to reach acceptable level the acceptable level
appropriate
appropriate optimized results ii) Intermediate ii) Demonstration
 techniques and tools ii) Intermediate modules/steps were and results are not ii) Expected results
-IA modules/steps were explained with satisfactory (3) are not obtained (1)
explained clearly with demonstration (5)
demonstration (7)
i) Individual i) Individual i) No contribution
Present results as a i) Significant individual
contribution to the contribution to the from an individual
team, with smooth contribution to the team
team is good team is moderate to a team
9.6.1 integration of ii) Modules are
5 ii) Modules are ii) Modules are ii) Modules are
contribution from all successfully integrated
successfully integrated integrated but integrated but
individual efforts - and expected results
and expected results expected results not expected results not
GA +IA obtained (5)
obtained(4) obtained (3) obtained(2)
i) Unable to deliver
i) Able to deliver i) Able to deliver i) Presentation is effective
effective presentation effective presentation satisfactory presentation
Deliver effective
10.5.2 ii) Presentation as per ii) Presentation as per ii) Presentation as ii) Not prepared as
oral presentation to 3
the guidelines the guidelines per the guidelines per the guidelines
examiners-IA
iii) Able to answer all iii) Unable to answer iii) Unable to answer iii) Unable to
queries (3) all queries (2) all queries (1) answer all
queries (0)
Marks in the brackets are the maximum marks that can be reduced for the relevant descriptor