7
7
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
This unit will help you to learn:
There are three components in this section:
The Canadian legal system is an integral aspect of daily life for all citizens, affecting
everything from personal relationships to driving a car. It can often be perceived as
difficult to understand and navigate, with laws that are lengthy and technical in nature.
However, the fundamentals of Canadian law are based on common sense and are
something that every citizen should strive to understand.
Security guards must have a fundamental understanding of the Canadian legal system,
including the rights that all people have, the authorities that can be exercised that affect
those rights, and the duties that come with those privileges. This chapter discusses the
role of the criminal law and how it affects persons in the security services industry.
The law is more than just a set of commands or rules; it is an attempt to balance the
rights and obligations that people share as members of society.
For example, a law that gives a person a legal right may also impose a legal duty upon
that person or another. It is the overall apportionment of rights, duties, privileges, and
powers, and how they are administered, that make up our legal system.
It is important to understand that laws are not simply handed down from above, but are
created and changed by society. As members of society, we must decide what our laws
will be. However, when creating new laws or changing old ones, it is important to
understand the basic principles of our legal heritage.
The Canadian legal system can function effectively only when citizens understand their
legal rights and responsibilities. This includes being willing to serve on a jury or coming
forward to testify in a trial.
Above all, it is the duty of citizens in a democratic society to learn as much as they can
about the laws and how the system of justice works. This section aims to demystify the
Canadian legal system and stimulate discussion about its fundamental principles, in an
attempt to encourage citizens to better understand the laws that govern their daily lives.
LAW
Law plays a crucial role in regulating the relationship between individuals and society as
a whole. Every human society has a legal system in place, as it is essential to resolve
conflicts that arise between the needs of individuals and those of the community.
However, it is important to note that law and justice are not synonymous, as law is seen
as "part of Western man's dream of life governed by reason."
In Canada, the legal system is a combination of two of the world's basic law systems:
1. COMMON LAW
2. CIVIL LAW.
❖ COMMON LAW
Common law, which originated in England, is unenacted law, as opposed to statutes and
ordinances. It is considered traditional law that has been in place for a long time and has
not been overridden by legislation.
❖ CIVIL LAW
Civil law is based on ancient Roman law and is codified by Napoleon. Most of continental
Europe, Scotland, Central and South America, parts of Asia (such as Taiwan), some of
the West Indies, and much of Africa use the civil law system.
The term "common law" has different meanings in different contexts. Sometimes it refers
to the entire legal system (in contrast with "civil law"), while other times it is contrasted
with equity or criminal law.
In the past, New France was the first region in Canada to adopt a system based on
European law. In 1664, Louis XIV of France ordained that French law that existed in the
area surrounding Paris should apply in the colony. This body of law was later
supplemented by portions of French law that developed in France during the 18th
century and by laws and regulations developed by the colonial authorities.
In 1763, the sovereignty of the territory now known as Canada was transferred from the
French to the English Crown. In 1774, the Quebec Act guaranteed that French civil law
(le droit civil) would be in place in Canada alongside English or public or constitutional
law and English parliamentary institutions. In 1857, the province of Canada legislated
the drafting of a Civil Code and a Code of Civil Procedure, which were major compilations
of Quebec private law on property and civil rights, as well as the form and style of
proceedings before Quebec courts.
These works were brought into force just prior to Confederation. Today, theorists
describe the Quebec legal system as mixed, as the relationships between and
transactions among persons subject to Quebec law are regulated by both the Civil Code
and the Code of Civil Procedure. Additionally, as a result of legislation passed in Quebec
since 1763 and later incorporated into the codes, portions of English law have also found
their way into Quebec private law.
While French court decisions and legal commentary may be respected in cases where
the provisions of French law align with those in Quebec, they do not hold binding
authority. Law reform in Quebec is influenced by legal developments in North America
and other regions, as well as continental Europe.
In contrast, the other Nine Provinces and territories in Canada have adopted English
common law. Each jurisdiction has a statute that states that from a certain date, the law
of England will be the law of the jurisdiction, unless it is changed by a statute. Prior to
1949, the highest court in Canada was the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, which
was based in London and primarily composed of English judges.
Canadian decisions are frequently cited in English cases and have had an impact on
English law. American states, with the exception of Louisiana, also adopted English
common law in the 18th century and, while the connection to modern English law is
weaker in the United States, American common law still retains the same style of
reasoning and argument found in countries affected by English law.
It is not necessary for individuals to have a thorough knowledge of the law, as this is the
role of lawyers. However, it is important to understand that in the Canadian legal system,
ignorance of the law is not a valid excuse for breaking it.
Those who are charged with an offence cannot simply claim that they were unaware of
the laws they were breaking, although the court may take into account any honest
mistakes of fact. Additionally, laws in Canada are publicly debated before being passed
by Parliament or a provincial legislature, and it is expected that the general public is
aware of what actions are permissible and which are not.
Being knowledgeable about the law means that citizens should take steps to ensure they
are acting within legal boundaries. Resources for information on the law can be found at
federal and provincial government offices, public libraries, and through the police. If after
consulting these sources, an individual is still uncertain about the legality of a certain
action, they should consult with a lawyer.
The legal system in Canada serves as a valuable framework for society, promoting the
rule of law, freedom under the law, and democratic principles. Our tradition of law and
justice is a significant aspect of Canadian heritage. As society evolves and changes, it
is important to ensure that this tradition continues to meet the challenges of the future.
In today's rapidly changing world, new social issues, medical advancements, and
technological advancements are constantly emerging. Issues that are of concern today
were not even imaginable just two decades ago. For instance, we are becoming
increasingly aware of the impact of modern society on the environment and the dangers
of pollution and waste. People are altering their attitudes towards various matters and
society.
❖ COURTS OF LAW
The Canadian courts are responsible for interpreting and enforcing the laws of the
country. They handle disputes between individuals, organizations, and governments,
both at the federal and provincial level. The courts are responsible for interpreting all
laws, whether they are passed by the federal Parliament, a provincial legislature, or a
municipality. The provinces are responsible for setting up and administering the courts
within their jurisdiction, while the federal government appoints the judges for the superior
and county/district courts.
The "inferior" provincial courts are staffed by appointees from the respective provinces.
However, the federal courts are both administered and staffed by the federal
government.
The Canadian court system is structured as a hierarchy of courts. The Supreme Court
of Canada is Canada's highest court.
As seen in the graph above, the Supreme Court can hear cases recommended to it by
the three lower courts:
Appeals from Provincial or Territorial Superior Courts are heard by the Provincial Courts
of Appeal. Provincial courts and provincial administrative tribunals assign cases to these
courts.
The Supreme Court of Canada, established in 1875, is the highest court for all legal
issues related to federal and provincial jurisdiction. It was created through a statute
passed by the Parliament as part of the Constitution Act, 1870. This change was made
in 1949, when appeals to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council of the UK were
abolished.
The creation of the Supreme Court sparked a heated debate among the Fathers of
Confederation, with some opposing the idea due to concerns over its impact on
provincial rights.
For example, John A. Macdonald, argued that the Constitution did not anticipate the
creation of such a court. Despite this opposition, the federal government led by
Alexander Mackenzie was able to persuade Parliament to pass the legislation, arguing
that it was needed to standardize Canadian law and provide constitutional interpretations
on issues that affect the evolution of the new federation.
PROVINCIAL/TERRITORIAL COURT
The court's provincially appointed judges consider criminal charges filed in Ontario as
well as family law proceedings including child protection, custody, access, maintenance
(not during divorce), child protection, and adoption (where there is no Unified Family
Court).
In a criminal law case, one judge handles less serious indictable and summary offences
(section 553 of the Criminal Code). Juvenile Court, Mental Health Court, Gladue Court,
and Drug Treatment Court are the four specialty courts.
❖ YOUTH COURT
Hears cases involving young persons charged under the Youth Criminal Act.
SCENARIO:
A 16-year-old student has been accused of stealing a textbook from a local bookstore.
The owner of the bookstore called the police and reported the theft, and the student was
subsequently arrested and charged with shoplifting.
In a youth court, the process for dealing with this case would differ somewhat from an
adult criminal trial. Typically, the goal of a youth court is to provide an opportunity for
rehabilitation and punishment less severe than what might be given to an adult for similar
offenses. Additionally, there may be restrictions on publishing the names or other
identifying information of the youth participants.
The youth court may start with a pre-adjudication meeting, where the accused and their
parents or guardians meet with the prosecuting attorney and the judge to discuss
possible rehabilitation options. If a plea agreement cannot be worked out, the case may
go to trial, where the judge hears evidence and makes a ruling based on the law.
In this case, if the accused is found guilty, they may be ordered to pay restitution to the
store, perform community service, and/or attend counseling or other intervention
programs. The goal of the youth court is to balance the necessity of discipline and
accountability with the youth's need for learning and rehabilitation in order to prevent
future offenses
Hears cases involving charges against people who have mental health difficulties.
SCENARIO:
A 25-year-old man suffering from schizophrenia is arrested and charged with assault
after an altercation with a passerby on the street. The accused, who has a history of
mental health issues and substance abuse, admits to the offense but also explains that
he was experiencing a delusion at the time of the incident.
In a mental health court, the focus is on providing treatment and support for individuals
with mental health disorders, rather than solely on punishing individuals for their crimes.
The court aims to address underlying issues such as addiction, homelessness, lack of
education, and social isolation in order to break the cycle of recidivism.
In this case, the mental health court would take into account the accused's mental health
history when making a ruling. Treatment providers, including both psychiatrists and
community support services, would be available to make recommendations to the court.
If the accused is deemed competent to stand trial and is found guilty, the judge may
order treatment measures such as therapy, medication, or counseling. The court may
also work with the accused's family and community agencies to ensure that he has
access to the services he needs to address his underlying issues and work towards long-
term recovery.
Overall, the goal of the mental health court is to provide a more compassionate and
effective response to individuals struggling with mental health and addiction issues,
helping to both improve individual well-being and reduce the pressure on the criminal
justice system.
❖ GLADUE COURT
is held in some locations for Aboriginal people who have been charged with a crime.
Scenario:
A 30-year-old Indigenous man is arrested and charged with assault after an altercation
with a neighbor. The accused, who has a history of substance abuse, spent some time
in a residential school as a child and has experienced significant trauma throughout his
life.
In a Gladue court, the focus is on recognizing the unique histories and circumstances of
Indigenous peoples and addressing the systemic issues that can contribute to criminal
behavior. The court takes into account the specific cultural backgrounds, education, and
familial situations of the accused in order to provide an outcome that is mindful of, and
55 Nugget Avenue, Unit#207, © Safety First Security (416) 906-4011
Scarborough, Ontario, M1S 3L1 [email protected]
P a g e | 10
seeks to heal or remediate, historical wrongs. The court draws on Gladue reports, which
are documents that detail the individual's background information, family history, and
cultural heritage.
In this case, the Gladue report would be used to help the judge understand the unique
challenges faced by the accused, including systemic and intergenerational traumas.
Based on the report, the accused may be recommended for various rehabilitative
measures, such as counseling or culturally appropriate addiction support. The court may
also work with restorative justice programs, Indigenous Elders, or other community-
based resources to develop a response that addresses the underlying issues behind the
behavior and promotes healing for both the accused and the community.
Overall, the goal of the Gladue court is to provide a culturally relevant and healing-
centered response to Indigenous peoples who have been involved in the criminal justice
system. By taking into account the specific experiences and histories of Indigenous
peoples, Gladue courts promote rehabilitation and healing, while still maintaining
accountability and responsibility for actions committed
Offers court-supervised treatment to people who are addicted to drugs and have been
charged with drug-related offences.
SCENARIO:
A 35-year-old man is arrested and charged with possession of cocaine. The accused
has a history of substance abuse and has been in and out of treatment programs in the
past.
In a drug treatment court, the focus is on helping individuals overcome their addiction
and address the underlying issues that may have led to their substance abuse. The court
aims to provide a combination of legal and treatment-based interventions to support
recovery and reduce the chances of future criminal activities.
In this case, the accused may be offered the opportunity to participate in a drug treatment
program as an alternative to incarceration. The goal of the treatment program is to
address the individual's addiction and any co-occurring mental health or other problems
55 Nugget Avenue, Unit#207, © Safety First Security (416) 906-4011
Scarborough, Ontario, M1S 3L1 [email protected]
P a g e | 11
that contribute to drug use. Treatment may involve various therapeutic approaches such
as cognitive-behavioral therapy, individual and group counseling, medication-assisted
treatment or 12-step recovery programs.
The accused may be required to attend regular court appearances, submit to drug tests,
and adhere to strict probationary terms, such as following a curfew, maintaining
employment or performing community service. Upon successful completion of the drug
treatment program, the accused may have their charges dismissed, reduced
Superior courts are administered by the provinces and territories, but justices are
appointed and paid by the federal government. The most serious criminal and civil cases
are heard in the superior courts.
THE SUPERIOR COURT also hears municipal appeals of less than $25,000 summary
offences, and family matters from provincial/territorial courts, as well as judicial news
from provincial tribunals.
The Rules of Civil Process, which are regulations under the Courts of Justice Act, govern
civil cases in the Superior Court.
The Provincial Superior Court is known as the Superior Court of Justice in Ontario.
Serious criminal offences (section 469 of the Criminal Code) and hybrid offences are
heard by a judge and a jury in the Superior Court of Justice, unless the parties agree to
a judge-only trial. The Unified Family Court hears all family cases, including divorce
(federal) and separation (provincial). A single judge presides over family cases.
now handles cases for up to $25,000 (up from $10,000) as of January 1, 2010. A judge
or, in some cases, a master hears the claims. The Superior Court of Justice has a
division called Divisional Court. It is not a trial court, but it is the primary forum for judicial
review of government action in Ontario.
Federally appointed judges review appeals from the Superior Court of Justice in the
Court of Appeal for Ontario. The Supreme Court of Canada hears appeals from the
Ontario Court of Appeal.
Each Canadian province is responsible for its own justice system, so when it comes to
evidence, each province has its own laws that must follow the CEA. Under s. 92 of the
Constitution Act, the rules of evidence for civil trials and some administrative matters are
set by provincial evidence acts.
The clerk of the court serves as the judge's assistant. When the judge enters the court,
the clerk commands "all rise," asks witnesses to take an oath or affirmation, calls
witnesses to the stand, and requests their full name for the court reporter.
The court reporter sits near the front of the courtroom, near the judge, recording the
verbal aspects of the trial proceedings.
❖ DEFENSE ADVOCATE
The lawyer who represents the person accused of breaking the law is known as counsel
for the defence. When the prosecutor has finished, the defence begins cross-examining
him.
❖ JUDGE
They hear the evidence and, if there is no jury (bench trial), decide on the accused's
innocence or guilt. When a jury is present, the judge instructs the jury on the applicable
law in a criminal case as well as the interpretation of the evidence they have heard. If
the accused is found guilty, the judge decides on the type and severity of the sentence.
Your Majesty
Your Excellency
❖ JURY
Juries are made up of 12 adult Canadian citizens who are sworn to investigate and
render a rational, impartial decision on facts. In other words, they will decide the outcome
of the case after hearing the information presented. They must reach a unanimous
decision. Jury Duty: Ministry of the Attorney General
❖ SECURITY GUARD
❖ WITNESSES
Witnesses are called to the court to give evidence in order to discover the truth about a
matter. They present evidence based on what they saw, heard, or know. This significant
contribution assists courts in reaching a fair decision.
WITNESSES
Witnesses are called to testify in court for the court to learn the truth about an incident.
The witness is summoned to court because he or she is knowledgeable about the case.
"EXPERT WITNESSES" are people whose knowledge of a specific topic (DNA, metal
fatigue, blood spatter, and so on) can help the court to understand an issue "being
debated. Expert witnesses provide expert advice.
“ORDINARY WITNESSES”, such as security guards, are expected to tell the truth about
what they know or saw; they may have a document that sheds light on a disputed issue
or have witnessed an offence.
Ordinary witnesses are not expected to be courtroom experts or even experts in what
occurred. While they should not provide expert opinions, they should answer questions
honestly because their information can assist the courts in making a fair decision. They
may be required to take the stand and testify personally, or they may simply be required
to produce documents related to the proceeding that they have in their possession.
❖ NO APPEARANCES IN COURT
If a summoned witness fails to appear in court, a warrant for their arrest may be issued.
If a witness appears in court but refuses to testify, the witness may be jailed for contempt
of court because witnesses are required to answer all questions unless the judge orders
otherwise. Summoning all witnesses, even willing witnesses, is important because it
ensures that their evidence will be heard even if they become ill with H1N1 on the day
they are to testify. Summoning witnesses avoids potentially irreversible damage to a
case if the witness fails to appear.
1. EXPLAIN TO THE WITNESS THE IMPORTANCE OF THEIR ROLE. Let the witness
know how their testimony can affect the outcome of the case.
2. SHARE RELEVANT DOCUMENTS, facts and details of the case, and discuss the
questions that may rise during cross-examination. Familiarity with relevant facts helps
the witness to provide more clear and accurate testimony.
5. PRACTICE TESTIMONY WITH THE WITNESS. It’s important to ensure that they can
communicate clearly and effectively. Encourage the witness to answer in full sentences,
and to avoid using jargon, vague or uncertain language.
Upon the court date, wish the witness good luck and assure them that they are confident
enough to present their testimony.
When the Security Guard is in court, it is important to be aware of the proper ways to
address those in authority. In most cases, the judge is referred to as "Your Honor." If you
are unsure of how to address the judge, you can ask the Crown or pay attention to how
court officials address them. When the judge speaks directly to you, it is important to
always address them as “Your Honor”.
In the Supreme Court, the judge should be referred to as "My Lord" or "My Lady." When
responding to a question from the Crown or Defense, it is appropriate to address them
as "Sir" or "Madam." It is important to maintain a level and respectful tone when
55 Nugget Avenue, Unit#207, © Safety First Security (416) 906-4011
Scarborough, Ontario, M1S 3L1 [email protected]
P a g e | 16
It is important to stay focused and stick to the facts when speaking in court. If you are
confused or unsure about a question, take a moment to think about it and ask for
clarification if necessary. The court will appreciate your efforts to be clear and precise in
your responses.
When preparing to testify, it is important to gather all relevant information related to the
incident. This includes:
Having all of this information readily available will help ensure that your testimony is clear
and accurate.
❖ PERSONAL APPERANCE
When preparing for your court appearance, it is important to thoroughly review any
relevant documents and familiarize yourself with the details of the case. Keep a
designated section in your memo book for notes related to the case and make sure to
arrive at the courthouse at least 15 minutes before your trial is scheduled to begin.
It is important to keep discussions about the case limited to the Crown or your defense
lawyer if you are the accused. Additionally, make sure to keep your notes out of sight
from the accused, defense lawyer, and any other parties connected to the case.
➢ Your demeanor should be serious and mature, and you should speak clearly and
deliberately.
➢ Use simple language and describe events in a logical and chronological order. Do not
exaggerate or use inflammatory language.
➢ Use standard time, not military time.
➢ If the judge is taking notes, speak directly to them and be prepared to repeat
information if asked.
➢ Only give facts that you know to be true and avoid hearsay.
➢ Refer to the accused by their last name and answer all questions unless stopped by
the judge or the Crown.
➢ If stopped, stay alert and do not volunteer opinions or additional information.
❖ RESPONDING TO QUESTIONS
➢ Wait for the entire question to be asked before providing an answer. This ensures
that you understand the full context of the question and can give a more accurate
and complete response.
➢ Consider the question carefully before answering. Take a moment to think about
what is being asked and how you should respond.
➢ Do not answer a question if you do not understand it. If you are unclear on what is
being asked, it is important to ask for clarification before providing an answer.
➢ Do not volunteer information. Only give the information that is requested. This can
help to avoid confusion and ensure that your testimony is focused and relevant.
➢ If you are in doubt as to whether to answer a question posed by the defense, pause
and look at the Crown for guidance. This helps to ensure that your testimony is
accurate and consistent with the prosecution's case.
➢ Do not appear to be evasive. It is important to answer questions directly and
honestly, even if the answer may not be favorable to the prosecution.
➢ The defense may ask you if you have discussed the case with anyone, and may
attempt to make it seem improper. You have the right to discuss the case with the
Crown, your client, your employer, or the police.
➢ Do not get confused by "rapid-fire" questions. Take your time and provide
thoughtful, well-considered answers.
➢ Do not answer multiple questions at once. It is important to focus on one question
at a time to ensure that your responses are clear and accurate.
➢ Maintain eye contact with your questioner. This helps to establish your credibility
and shows that you are engaged and attentive.
➢ If the judge asks you a question, look directly at them and turn your body so that
you are facing them directly.
➢ Remember to refer to yourself as "I" when giving your testimony.
➢ When mentioning fellow guards, always use their full name i.e. John, Douglas, etc.
➢ When referring to witnesses or others in the case, refer to them as
Mr./Mrs./Miss/Ms and last name. This also goes for the accused.
PERJURY
Section 131 of the Criminal Code of Canada states that anyone who makes a false
statement with the intent to mislead, while under oath or affirmation, is guilty of
committing perjury. This applies to statements made both in writing and orally.
According to Section 132 of the Criminal Code, anyone found guilty of committing perjury
can face severe punishment. They may be charged with an indictable offense and may
be subject to imprisonment for a maximum of 14 years. This highlights the seriousness
of making false statements under oath and the severe consequences that can result
from doing so.
1. A witness in a criminal trial testifies under oath that they did not see the defendant at
the scene of the crime, when in fact they did.
2. A person is called to testify in regard to their knowledge of a car accident. The witness
lies about having seen the accident occur and the details that they provide do not match
the physical evidence.
3. During a divorce proceeding, a spouse lies under oath about not having had an affair,
even though they had.
4. A person gives false testimony during a hearing or deposition in a civil lawsuit, and
their testimony causes the case to be decided unfairly.
5. A witness who has been granted immunity lies about their involvement in a crime
during their testimony in order to avoid criminal charges.
6. A police officer who used excessive force against a suspect gives false testimony in
court about the events that took place during the arrest.
7. A defendant in a trial lies under oath about their whereabouts during the time of a
crime, and the lie is discovered through witness testimony or physical evidence.
Perjury is a serious crime that can result in fines, imprisonment, and other legal
consequences. It undermines the fairness and integrity of the court system and can lead
to wrongful convictions, which is why it is punished harshly.
PART 2: EVIDENCE
Canada has its own Evidence Act for each province and territory. Here is a list of the
Evidence Acts that were in place at the time this was written:
When security guards know the rules of evidence, they can use these rules to collect
and keep evidence for use in a court of law. Since security guards are responsible for
making documents that are often important in criminal and civil law cases, they should
pay special attention to the electronic evidence and business records sections. So, they
should read the Ontario Evidence Act, the Canada Evidence Act, and the Charter of
Rights and Freedoms often so that they know what the Act says. Take some time now
to read the Ontario Evidence Act if you haven't already.
The Victim's Bill of Rights, which became law in 1996, sets out important rules for how
crime victims should be treated. The Ontario Evidence Act was changed because of
these ideas (see section 18). These changes make it easier for children and people who
are vulnerable to testify in court by:
Changing the rules about how child witnesses can testify, getting rid of the need to
confirm a child's testimony, putting up screens and closed-circuit TV, and giving child
witnesses options for reviewing whether hearsay evidence can be used in court.
❖ EXPERT EVIDENCE
❖ ATTENDANCE OF WITNESSES
"A witness served in due time with a summons issued out of a court in Ontario, and paid
proper witness fees and conduct money, who makes default in obeying such summons,
without any lawful and reasonable impediment, in addition to any penalty he or she may
incur as for a contempt of court, is liable to an action on the part of the person by whom,
or on whose behalf, he or she has been summonsed for any damage that such person
may sustain or be put to by reason of such default.– R.S.O. 1990, c. E.23, s. 19."
❖ BUSINESS RECORDS
"35. (1) In this section, “business” includes every kind of business, profession,
occupation, calling, operation or activity, whether carried on for profit or otherwise;
(“enterprise”). “record” includes any information that is recorded or stored by means of
any device. (“document”).– R.S.O. 1990, c. E.23, s. 35 (1)."
"(2) Any writing or record made of any act, transaction, occurrence or event is admissible
as evidence of such act, transaction, occurrence or event if made in the usual and
ordinary course of any business and if it was in the usual and ordinary course of such
business to make such writing or record at the time of such act, transaction, occurrence
or event or within a reasonable time thereafter. – R.S.O. 1990, c. E.23, s. 35 (2)."
55 Nugget Avenue, Unit#207, © Safety First Security (416) 906-4011
Scarborough, Ontario, M1S 3L1 [email protected]
P a g e | 22
TYPES OF EVIDENCE
Types of evidence play an important role in the legal system. They are used to prove the
facts in a case and can include:
❖ TESTIMONIAL
It is testimony when a witness gives an oral statement under oath. Even if witnesses
appear in court voluntarily, they are frequently summoned or subpoenaed.
❖ DOCUMENTARY
Documentary evidence is evidence that has been preserved through the use of some
form of media.
• Emails
• Photographs taken on a digital camera
• History of instant messaging
55 Nugget Avenue, Unit#207, © Safety First Security (416) 906-4011
Scarborough, Ontario, M1S 3L1 [email protected]
P a g e | 23
Exculpatory evidence in a criminal trial is evidence that tends to clear the defendant of
guilt or blame. It is illegal for the police or the prosecution to withhold such evidence. A
case can be dismissed if the prosecution fails to disclose exculpatory evidence.
Both of these words derive from the Latin word "culpa," which means "fault."
❖ SCIENTIFIC
Scientific evidence is theoretic evidence based on the scientific method and involves the
use of expert witnesses who educate the judge and/or jury about a relevant theory, report
tests and results to the judge and/or jury, and interpret test results.
❖ DEMONSTRATIVE
Evidence presented to assist the judge and/or jury in better understanding a fact, object,
or testimony is known as demonstrative evidence. This evidence can be used to illustrate
or explain testimony, or it can be used to recreate something tangible in nature, such as
an experiment or event. Among the various types of demonstrative evidence are scale
models, police composites, computer animation, and microscopic enlargements.
In the previous chapter, it was highlighted that security guards play a crucial role in
preserving crime scenes by collecting and protecting evidence. However, it is important
to note that the handling of evidence is not as straightforward as portrayed on television.
It is important to remember that not all evidence is physical; some can be in the form of
written documents. The role of security guards is to safeguard any evidence that may be
used in court.
55 Nugget Avenue, Unit#207, © Safety First Security (416) 906-4011
Scarborough, Ontario, M1S 3L1 [email protected]
P a g e | 24
Security guards must follow six core steps. to ensure that evidence is collected, secured,
and preserved correctly,
1. COLLECT
2. SECURE
3. PRESERVE
4. IDENTIFY
5. CONTINUITY
6. LOG
❖ COLLECT
Evidence must be collected in such a way that its evidentiary value is preserved. All
evidence collection materials and equipment are chosen and assembled by the
investigator or designated evidence technician.
Different types of crime scenes require different types of experts to collect the evidence.
These experts will determine what constitutes evidence and which evidence should be
collected first.
For example, evidence in a crime against a person may include blood, sperm, saliva,
hair, tissue, and fibre, whereas evidence in a crime against property may include glass,
paint, tool marks, or accelerants. In general, evidence that is at risk of being lost or
destroyed is collected first.
At the crime scene, comparison samples are also collected. Comparison samples help
in determining what was present at the scene prior to the crime. For example, in the case
of suspected arson, the investigator may collect non-fire debris carpet or wood trim at
the scene and compare it to fire debris carpet or wood trim samples.
seals/tape, high - intensity lights, latent print kit, magnifying glass, measuring devices,
permanent markers, photographic scale (ruler), presumptive blood test supplies, sketch
paper, tool kit, tweezers/forceps are just a few examples.
Other useful items include a bloodstain pattern examination kit, business cards, chemical
enhancement supplies, an entomology (insect) collection kit, extension cords, a forensic
light source (alternate light source, UV lamp/laser, goggles), a gunshot residue kit, a
laser trajectory kit, maps, marking paint/snow wax, a metal detector, a mirror, a phone
listing (important numbers), privacy screens, a protrusion rod set,
There are also evidence collection kits for blood collection, blood stain pattern
documentation, fingerprint impression and excavating tool marks, trace evidence
collection, trajectory, and pattern print lifter kits.
❖ SECURE
When the crime scene has been secured, every effort must be made to protect the
evidence. Access to evidence must be exceedingly restricted to protect it from being
trampled, destroyed or lost. Controlled, well-documented access safeguards the chain
of custody and, as a result, the likelihood of admissibility in court. Furthermore, crime
scene evidence must be properly protected, packaged, labelled, and kept secure until it
is submitted to a secure storage area, such as a law enforcement agency.
❖ PRESERVE
Access to the crime scene is restricted to avoid contamination. Trampling, weather, and
excessive handling can all cause evidence to deteriorate. People who arrive at the scene
can contaminate evidence by leaving their own hairs, fibers, prints, and so on.
Excessive handling, folding, crumpling, and so on can result in the loss of evidence.
Such treatment causes impressions to deteriorate, among other things. Shoeprints, tyre
tracks, and trace evidence are all fragile.
Because forensic science laboratories can take weeks to process evidence, care must
be taken in packaging and preserving the evidence to maintain its quality and prevent
deterioration, release, or contamination.
Packaging options include envelopes, paper bags, plastic bags, and containers
designed for physical evidence. Obviously, the size, shape, and type of evidence, as
well as lab policies and procedures and the type of testing to be performed, determine
which will be used.
❖ IDENTIFY
to be admitted as evidence in court, the chain of custody, which reveals how the
evidence was discovered, collected, analysed, and preserved, must be meticulously
maintained. The continuity of the chain of custody ensures the evidence's integrity.
A valid chain of custody record is required for evidence to be admissible in court. The
chain of custody is a record of the custodial history of evidence, that is, who has had
physical possession as well as why and where.
❖ LOG
Every step in the evidence collection procedure must be clearly documented, in addition
to being documented with photographs, videos, and sketches.
That documentation includes where the evidence was discovered, how it was handled,
and what happened to it. Furthermore, all access to evidence must be clearly
documented in order for it to be admissible in court.
The process of establishing the chain of custody for evidence begins at the crime scene.
As a result, the following is documented:
❖ COLLECT
It is not the job of the security guard to process a crime scene. Security guards do not
have the skills, training or proper equipment to perform such a job. Collecting evidence
is a police responsibility. Despite that, the notes that security guards take, including
witness and suspect statements, are part of the collection process.
❖ SECURE
Contain the scene and protect it to prevent contamination or loss of evidence. The
perimeter of a crime scene or accident should be set generously since it is easier to
contract the perimeter than to expand it once evidence has been trampled. Yellow tape
barricades, traffic cones, and rope, or even branches can be used to set the perimeter.
Do not leave until you are relieved of your duties and record the name of the guard that
relieves you and the time. Evacuate the scene if there is a threat.
when another guard arrives to assume control of the scene, verbally confirm this as a
fact and record the time and the person’s name and rank.”
❖ PRESERVE
When you enter the scene of an incident, enter carefully and maintain a restricted path
so as not to destroy evidence. Do not touch or remove evidence unless it is in danger of
being destroyed or compromised. Photographs of such information can be useful.
Evidence that is outdoors can be protected from the elements, if necessary, by covering
with boxes. Note areas of possible evidence and protect it. Record unusual odours or
nearby vehicles. Do not move seriously injured people except to protect them from
further harm. Do not use toilets, sinks or telephone at the scene if at all possible (but
make note that you did if you must). Permit only essential personnel inside the scene.
According to the Correctional Service of Canada, the following steps must be taken to
preserve evidence:
❖ IDENTIFY
Identify yourself as a security guard. Recognize the problem, assess the situation and
take control. Identify injuries and give first aid as required. Identify witness and separate
them from the scene. Separate witnesses and victims. Identify sources of evidence
including all of the following: victims, witnesses, suspects, and physical evidence.
❖ CONTINUITY
If as a security guard you are the first to arrive on scene, you will begin the process of
preserving continuity of evidence. Diligently keep the evidence in sight and stay at the
scene until you are relieved of your duties. If the evidence is temporary in nature,
describe it in your notebook. You can also photograph it and/or cover it with boxes. Log
your actions. A continuity log notes the time, the evidence, the location of the evidence
and what you did to the evidence. For the security guard, the responsibility for the
protection, preservation and continuity of the evidence ends when the crime scene and
the evidence are assumed by the police or investigative body.
❖ LOG
If you have been called to a crime scene by a resident, customer, etc, record who told
you and when, and your route to the scene. Be aware of the people and vehicles you
see on the way to the crime scene as they may be suspects or witnesses. Log the time
of your arrival whether you have been called to the crime scene or come upon it. Notify
your supervisor when you arrive. If emergency service or police or backup is necessary
and has not yet been called for, make the calls.
Describe the scene upon arrival. Draw a diagram of it. Be careful to not alter the scene.
Record sensory information (what you see, hear, smell, etc) since EMS personnel,
Police officers and fire fighters may inadvertently alter the scene while saving lives and
preserving property.
Log your route or path taken through the crime scene, the location of possible evidence,
the circumstances, the conditions (including weather), actions taken and why they were
taken, people on the scene (victims, witnesses, possible suspects and their
descriptions).
Log the name, addresses and phone numbers of people at the scene. Ask what they
were doing there before you arrived on the scene. Record anything you change at the
scene. Record evidence that was collected, from where, when, why and by whom.
Record arrivals and departures from the scene.
The device is photographed (including its screen, position, and connections). Then,
disconnect all power sources by unplugging the gadget from the rear. In the event that
this is not possible, the device is retrieved and an expert is consulted as quickly as
possible, as inspection delays may result in the loss of data because to insufficient
internal power supply
➢ Tape is affixed to the access points (e.g., drive slots and media slots).
➢ The criminal justice system has benefited from technological advances in the areas
The Exclusionary Rule is a principle in Canadian courts that states that physical evidence
of an offence that is obtained through illegal means may still be introduced as evidence
in a trial.
This means that even if the police conduct an illegal search and seize items that are later
used in a person's trial, these items can still be used as evidence.
The Supreme Court of Canada has upheld this principle, stating that society's interest in
obtaining a conviction outweighs the infringement of a defendant's human rights,
regardless of whether or not the defendant is guilty. This means that even if the evidence
was obtained through police misconduct, it can still be used in court as long as it
establishes the defendant's guilt.
MUNICIPLE BY LAWS
By-laws, also known as laws passed by the municipal council, can vary depending on
the municipality in which you are working.
• Towns,
• Villages, and resort villages,
• Rural municipalities,
• Restructured municipalities, and
• Northern municipalities.
Under the Canadian Constitution, provinces have the authority to create municipalities
and delegate certain law-making powers to them. These laws, known as by-laws, can
be specific or general in nature depending on the legislation. The Municipalities Act and
The Cities Act provide municipalities with the general power to pass by-laws within their
areas of jurisdiction.
It is important to note that in the event of a conflict between a local by-law and a
Provincial Act, the provincial statutory provision typically takes precedence. Information
about city by-laws can be found on the internet or at your local city or town hall.
➢ Smoking
➢ Animal care
➢ The removal of snow
➢ Fire
➢ Stopping and parking, including idling
➢ Collection and disposal of waste
➢ Property requirements
➢ Water constraints
➢ Licensing (taxis, adult video stores, and massage parlours)
The Municipal Act, 2001 Section 8 broadly empowers Ontario municipalities to pass
bylaws, subject to the rules in subsection (4), respecting the following matters:
Under the Municipal Act 2001, security guards may be called upon to play a role in the
closing of premises and addressing public nuisances.
In some cases, a security guard may be appointed as an inspector for the purposes of
enforcing these regulations. In this capacity, their role may involve responding to
complaints from the public, identifying areas of non-compliance, and ensuring that
property owners are taking appropriate action to address any issues.
Based on the evidence collected, the security guard may be required to take actions
such as issuing warnings or compliance orders, closing the premises, or taking other
enforcement actions as permitted under municipal bylaws.
In some cases, their role may involve coordinating with other law enforcement agencies
or community organizations in order to effectively address concerns related to public
safety and security.
In summary, the role of a security guard under the Municipal Act 2001 in relation to the
closing of premises and addressing public nuisance is to act as an inspector,
investigating complaints and identifying areas of non-compliance with municipal bylaws
and regulations.
Through their efforts, they play a vital role in ensuring the safety and well-being of the
community by enforcing rules that promote public order and harmony.
Under the Municipal Act 2001, security guards may be granted the power of entry when
acting as an inspector or enforcement officer for a municipality. This power allows them
to enter onto a property in order to conduct investigations, ensure compliance with
municipal bylaws, and to take appropriate enforcement action as necessary.
The power of entry is an important tool available to security guards acting under the
Municipal Act, and it allows them to enter onto a property without prior notice or consent
from the owner or occupant. This power can be used to investigate issues such as
building code violations, health and safety concerns, and public nuisance complaints.
Before exercising the power of entry, the security guard must identify themselves and
explain the purpose of their visit to the property owner or occupant. They must also be
able to provide evidence that they are authorized to act as an inspector or enforcement
guard under the Municipal Act.
During their investigation, the security guard is obligated to respect the property rights
of the owner or occupant, and to minimize any disruptions or inconveniences caused by
their presence. They must also comply with any applicable privacy laws, and only collect
information that is relevant to their investigation.
If the security guard discovers evidence of a violation during their investigation, they may
take appropriate enforcement action as permitted under the Municipal Act. This may
include issuing compliance orders, levying fines, or taking other steps to ensure that the
property owner comes into compliance with municipal bylaws.
In summary, the power of entry granted to security guards under the Municipal Act 2001
allows them to enter onto a property in order to investigate suspected violations of
municipal bylaws and to take appropriate enforcement action. When exercising this
power, security guards must act in accordance with the law, respect the property rights
of owners and occupants, and ensure that their actions are reasonable and proportionate
to the circumstances.
Under the Municipal Act 2001, security guards may be appointed as bylaw enforcement
officer to help ensure compliance with smoking regulations in public places. Specifically,
the Smoke-Free Ontario Act (SFOA) prohibits smoking in enclosed public places and
enclosed workplaces, as well as other designated outdoor spaces.
As a bylaw enforcement officer, the security guard has the authority to approach
individuals who appear to be smoking in prohibited areas and inform them of the
applicable smoking restriction. The guard may also investigate complaints from the
public regarding smoking bylaws and conduct inspections of public places to ensure
compliance.
To enforce smoking bylaws effectively, security guards should be familiar with the
specific restrictions in their jurisdiction and understand the proper procedures for issuing
warnings or fines. They may also need to be trained in methods of collecting evidence,
conducting investigations, and employing de-escalation techniques when interacting
with individuals who are smoking in prohibited areas.
In sum, the security guard role under the Municipal Act 2001, as it relates to smoking in
public places, is that of a bylaw enforcement officer responsible for ensuring compliance
with municipal regulations prohibiting smoking in certain areas. By enforcing these
bylaws, along with taking steps to educate the public and raise awareness about public
health concerns, security guards help to promote a safe and healthy environment for all.