R Programming for Data Science 1st Edition Roger Peng - Download the ebook today to explore every detail
R Programming for Data Science 1st Edition Roger Peng - Download the ebook today to explore every detail
com
https://textbookfull.com/product/r-programming-for-data-
science-1st-edition-roger-peng/
OR CLICK HERE
DOWLOAD EBOOK
https://textbookfull.com/product/r-for-data-science-1st-edition-
garrett-grolemund/
textbookfull.com
Programming Skills for Data Science 1st Edition Michael
Freeman
https://textbookfull.com/product/programming-skills-for-data-
science-1st-edition-michael-freeman/
textbookfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/functional-data-structures-in-r-
advanced-statistical-programming-in-r-mailund/
textbookfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/advanced-r-data-programming-and-the-
cloud-1st-edition-matt-wiley/
textbookfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/doing-data-science-in-r-an-
introduction-for-social-scientists-1st-edition-mark-andrews/
textbookfull.com
R Programming for Data Science
Roger D. Peng
This book is for sale at http://leanpub.com/rprogramming
This is a Leanpub book. Leanpub empowers authors and publishers with the Lean Publishing
process. Lean Publishing is the act of publishing an in-progress ebook using lightweight tools and
many iterations to get reader feedback, pivot until you have the right book and build traction once
you do.
1. Stay in Touch! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2. Preface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
15. Functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
15.1 Functions in R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
15.2 Your First Function . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
15.3 Argument Matching . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
15.4 Lazy Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
15.5 The ... Argument . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
15.6 Arguments Coming After the ... Argument . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
15.7 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
23. Data Analysis Case Study: Changes in Fine Particle Air Pollution in the U.S. . . . . . . 148
23.1 Synopsis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148
23.2 Loading and Processing the Raw Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148
23.3 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150
around the department, I decided to start a “brown bag” series where every week for about an hour
I would talk about something you could do in R (which wasn’t much, really). People seemed to like
it, if only because there wasn’t really anyone to turn to if you wanted to learn about R.
By the time I left grad school in 2003, the department had essentially switched over from XLisp-
Stat to R for all its work (although there were a few hold outs). Jan discusses the rationale for the
transition in a paper³ in the Journal of Statistical Software.
In the next step of my career, I went to the Department of Biostatistics⁴ at the Johns Hopkins
Bloomberg School of Public Health, where I have been for the past 16 years. When I got to Johns
Hopkins people already seemed into R. Most people had abandoned S-PLUS a while ago and were
committed to using R for their research. Of all the available statistical packages, R had the most
powerful and expressive programming language, which was perfect for someone developing new
statistical methods.
However, we didn’t really have a class that taught students how to use R. This was a problem because
most of our grad students were coming into the program having never heard of R. Most likely in
their undergraduate programs, they used some other software package. So along with Rafael Irizarry,
Brian Caffo, Ingo Ruczinski, and Karl Broman, I started a new class to teach our graduate students
R and a number of other skills they’d need in grad school.
The class was basically a weekly seminar where one of us talked about a computing topic of interest.
I gave some of the R lectures in that class and when I asked people who had heard of R before, almost
no one raised their hand. And no one had actually used it before. The main selling point at the time
was “It’s just like S-PLUS but it’s free!” A lot of people had experience with SAS or Stata or SPSS.
A number of people had used something like Java or C/C++ before and so I often used that as a
reference frame. No one had ever used a functional-style of programming language like Scheme or
Lisp.
To this day, I still teach the class, known a Biostatistics 140.776 (“Statistical Computing”). However,
the nature of the class has changed quite a bit over the years. The population of students (mostly
first-year graduate students) has shifted to the point where many of them have been introduced to R
as undergraduates. This trend mirrors the overall trend with statistics where we are seeing more and
more students do undergraduate majors in statistics (as opposed to, say, mathematics). Eventually,
by 2008–2009, when I’d asked how many people had heard of or used R before, everyone raised
their hand. However, even at that late date, I still felt the need to convince people that R was a “real”
language that could be used for real tasks.
R has grown a lot in recent years, and is being used in so many places now, that I think it’s
essentially impossible for a person to keep track of everything that is going on. That’s fine, but
it makes “introducing” people to R an interesting experience. Nowadays in class, students are often
teaching me something new about R that I’ve never seen or heard of before (they are quite good
at Googling around for themselves). I feel no need to “bring people over” to R. In fact it’s quite the
opposite–people might start asking questions if I weren’t teaching R.
³http://www.jstatsoft.org/v13/i07
⁴http://www.biostat.jhsph.edu
Preface 4
This book comes from my experience teaching R in a variety of settings and through different stages
of its (and my) development. Much of the material has been taken from by Statistical Computing
class as well as the R Programming⁵ class I teach through Coursera.
I’m looking forward to teaching R to people as long as people will let me, and I’m interested in
seeing how the next generation of students will approach it (and how my approach to them will
change). Overall, it’s been just an amazing experience to see the widespread adoption of R over the
past decade. I’m sure the next decade will be just as amazing.
⁵https://www.coursera.org/course/rprog
3. History and Overview of R
There are only two kinds of languages: the ones people complain about and the ones
nobody uses —Bjarne Stroustrup
3.1 What is R?
This is an easy question to answer. R is a dialect of S.
3.2 What is S?
S is a language that was developed by John Chambers and others at the old Bell Telephone
Laboratories, originally part of AT&T Corp. S was initiated in 1976² as an internal statistical analysis
environment—originally implemented as Fortran libraries. Early versions of the language did not
even contain functions for statistical modeling.
In 1988 the system was rewritten in C and began to resemble the system that we have today (this
was Version 3 of the language). The book Statistical Models in S by Chambers and Hastie (the white
book) documents the statistical analysis functionality. Version 4 of the S language was released in
1998 and is the version we use today. The book Programming with Data by John Chambers (the
green book) documents this version of the language.
Since the early 90’s the life of the S language has gone down a rather winding path. In 1993 Bell Labs
gave StatSci (later Insightful Corp.) an exclusive license to develop and sell the S language. In 2004
Insightful purchased the S language from Lucent for $2 million. In 2006, Alcatel purchased Lucent
Technologies and is now called Alcatel-Lucent.
Insightful sold its implementation of the S language under the product name S-PLUS and built a
number of fancy features (GUIs, mostly) on top of it—hence the “PLUS”. In 2008 Insightful was
acquired by TIBCO for $25 million. As of this writing TIBCO is the current owner of the S language
and is its exclusive developer.
The fundamentals of the S language itself has not changed dramatically since the publication of the
Green Book by John Chambers in 1998. In 1998, S won the Association for Computing Machinery’s
Software System Award, a highly prestigious award in the computer science field.
¹https://youtu.be/STihTnVSZnI
²http://cm.bell-labs.com/stat/doc/94.11.ps
History and Overview of R 6
“[W]e wanted users to be able to begin in an interactive environment, where they did not
consciously think of themselves as programming. Then as their needs became clearer and
their sophistication increased, they should be able to slide gradually into programming,
when the language and system aspects would become more important.”
The key part here was the transition from user to developer. They wanted to build a language that
could easily service both “people”. More technically, they needed to build language that would
be suitable for interactive data analysis (more command-line based) as well as for writing longer
programs (more traditional programming language-like).
3.4 Back to R
The R language came to use quite a bit after S had been developed. One key limitation of the S
language was that it was only available in a commericial package, S-PLUS. In 1991, R was created
by Ross Ihaka and Robert Gentleman in the Department of Statistics at the University of Auckland. In
1993 the first announcement of R was made to the public. Ross’s and Robert’s experience developing
R is documented in a 1996 paper in the Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics:
Ross Ihaka and Robert Gentleman. R: A language for data analysis and graphics. Journal
of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 5(3):299–314, 1996
In 1995, Martin Mächler made an important contribution by convincing Ross and Robert to use the
GNU General Public License⁴ to make R free software. This was critical because it allowed for the
source code for the entire R system to be accessible to anyone who wanted to tinker with it (more
on free software later).
In 1996, a public mailing list was created (the R-help and R-devel lists) and in 1997 the R Core
Group was formed, containing some people associated with S and S-PLUS. Currently, the core group
controls the source code for R and is solely able to check in changes to the main R source tree. Finally,
in 2000 R version 1.0.0 was released to the public.
³http://www.stat.bell-labs.com/S/history.html
⁴http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html
History and Overview of R 7
2.0⁶.
According to the Free Software Foundation, with free software, you are granted the following four
freedoms⁷
• The freedom to run the program, for any purpose (freedom 0).
• The freedom to study how the program works, and adapt it to your needs (freedom 1). Access
to the source code is a precondition for this.
• The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbor (freedom 2).
• The freedom to improve the program, and release your improvements to the public, so that the
whole community benefits (freedom 3). Access to the source code is a precondition for this.
You can visit the Free Software Foundation’s web site⁸ to learn a lot more about free software. The
Free Software Foundation was founded by Richard Stallman in 1985 and Stallman’s personal web
site⁹ is an interesting read if you happen to have some spare time.
1. The “base” R system that you download from CRAN: Linux¹¹ Windows¹² Mac¹³ Source Code¹⁴
2. Everything else.
• The “base” R system contains, among other things, the base package which is required to run
R and contains the most fundamental functions.
• The other packages contained in the “base” system include utils, stats, datasets, graphics,
grDevices, grid, methods, tools, parallel, compiler, splines, tcltk, stats4.
• There are also “Recommended” packages: boot, class, cluster, codetools, foreign, KernS-
mooth, lattice, mgcv, nlme, rpart, survival, MASS, spatial, nnet, Matrix.
⁶http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html
⁷http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
⁸http://www.fsf.org
⁹https://stallman.org
¹⁰http://cran.r-project.org
¹¹http://cran.r-project.org/bin/linux/
¹²http://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/
¹³http://cran.r-project.org/bin/macosx/
¹⁴http://cran.r-project.org/src/base/R-3/R-3.1.3.tar.gz
History and Overview of R 9
When you download a fresh installation of R from CRAN, you get all of the above, which represents
a substantial amount of functionality. However, there are many other packages available:
• There are over 4000 packages on CRAN that have been developed by users and programmers
around the world.
• There are also many packages associated with the Bioconductor project¹⁵.
• People often make packages available on their personal websites; there is no reliable way to
keep track of how many packages are available in this fashion.
• There are a number of packages being developed on repositories like GitHub and BitBucket but
there is no reliable listing of all these packages.
3.8 Limitations of R
No programming language or statistical analysis system is perfect. R certainly has a number of
drawbacks. For starters, R is essentially based on almost 50 year old technology, going back to the
original S system developed at Bell Labs. There was originally little built in support for dynamic or
3-D graphics (but things have improved greatly since the “old days”).
Another commonly cited limitation of R is that objects must generally be stored in physical memory.
This is in part due to the scoping rules of the language, but R generally is more of a memory hog
than other statistical packages. However, there have been a number of advancements to deal with
this, both in the R core and also in a number of packages developed by contributors. Also, computing
power and capacity has continued to grow over time and amount of physical memory that can be
installed on even a consumer-level laptop is substantial. While we will likely never have enough
physical memory on a computer to handle the increasingly large datasets that are being generated,
the situation has gotten quite a bit easier over time.
At a higher level one “limitation” of R is that its functionality is based on consumer demand and
(voluntary) user contributions. If no one feels like implementing your favorite method, then it’s your
job to implement it (or you need to pay someone to do it). The capabilities of the R system generally
reflect the interests of the R user community. As the community has ballooned in size over the past
10 years, the capabilities have similarly increased. When I first started using R, there was very little
in the way of functionality for the physical sciences (physics, astronomy, etc.). However, now some
of those communities have adopted R and we are seeing more code being written for those kinds of
applications.
If you want to know my general views on the usefulness of R, you can see them here in the following
exchange on the R-help mailing list with Douglas Bates and Brian Ripley in June 2004:
Roger D. Peng: I don’t think anyone actually believes that R is designed to make everyone
happy. For me, R does about 99% of the things I need to do, but sadly, when I need to order
a pizza, I still have to pick up the telephone.
¹⁵http://bioconductor.org
History and Overview of R 10
Douglas Bates: There are several chains of pizzerias in the U.S. that provide for Internet-
based ordering (e.g. www.papajohnsonline.com) so, with the Internet modules in R, it’s
only a matter of time before you will have a pizza-ordering function available.
Brian D. Ripley: Indeed, the GraphApp toolkit (used for the RGui interface under R for
Windows, but Guido forgot to include it) provides one (for use in Sydney, Australia, we
presume as that is where the GraphApp author hails from). Alternatively, a Padovian has
no need of ordering pizzas with both home and neighbourhood restaurants ….
At this point in time, I think it would be fairly straightforward to build a pizza ordering R package
using something like the RCurl or httr packages. Any takers?
3.9 R Resources
Official Manuals
As far as getting started with R by reading stuff, there is of course this book. Also, available from
CRAN¹⁶ are
• An Introduction to R¹⁷
• R Data Import/Export¹⁸
• Writing R Extensions¹⁹: Discusses how to write and organize R packages
• R Installation and Administration²⁰: This is mostly for building R from the source code)
• R Internals²¹: This manual describes the low level structure of R and is primarily for developers
and R core members
• R Language Definition²²: This documents the R language and, again, is primarily for developers
• Venables & Ripley (2000). S Programming, Springer: This book is a little old but is still relevant
and accurate. Despite its title, this book is useful for R also.
• Murrell (2005). R Graphics, Chapman & Hall/CRC Press: Paul Murrell wrote and designed much
of the graphics system in R and this book essentially documents the underlying details. This
is not so much a “user-level” book as a developer-level book. But it is an important book for
anyone interested in designing new types of graphics or visualizations.
• Wickham (2014). Advanced R, Chapman & Hall/CRC Press: This book by Hadley Wickham
covers a number of areas including object-oriented programming, functional programming,
profiling and other advanced topics.
Other Resources
• Major technical publishers like Springer, Chapman & Hall/CRC have entire series of books
dedicated to using R in various applications. For example, Springer has a series of books called
Use R!.
• A longer list of books can be found on the CRAN web site²³.
²³http://www.r-project.org/doc/bib/R-books.html
4. Getting Started with R
4.1 Installation
The first thing you need to do to get started with R is to install it on your computer. R works on
pretty much every platform available, including the widely available Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux
systems. If you want to watch a step-by-step tutorial on how to install R for Mac or Windows, you
can watch these videos:
• Installing R on Windows¹
• Installing R on the Mac²
There is also an integrated development environment available for R that is built by RStudio. I really
like this IDE—it has a nice editor with syntax highlighting, there is an R object viewer, and there are
a number of other nice features that are integrated. You can see how to install RStudio here
• Installing RStudio³
¹http://youtu.be/Ohnk9hcxf9M
²https://youtu.be/uxuuWXU-7UQ
³https://youtu.be/bM7Sfz-LADM
⁴http://rstudio.com
⁵https://youtu.be/8xT3hmJQskU
⁶https://youtu.be/XBcvH1BpIBo
5. R Nuts and Bolts
5.1 Entering Input
Watch a video of this section¹
At the R prompt we type expressions. The <- symbol is the assignment operator.
> x <- 1
> print(x)
[1] 1
> x
[1] 1
> msg <- "hello"
The # character indicates a comment. Anything to the right of the # (including the # itself) is ignored.
This is the only comment character in R. Unlike some other languages, R does not support multi-line
comments or comment blocks.
5.2 Evaluation
When a complete expression is entered at the prompt, it is evaluated and the result of the evaluated
expression is returned. The result may be auto-printed.
The [1] shown in the output indicates that x is a vector and 5 is its first element.
Typically with interactive work, we do not explicitly print objects with the print function; it is much
easier to just auto-print them by typing the name of the object and hitting return/enter. However,
¹https://youtu.be/vGY5i_J2c-c?t=4m43s
R Nuts and Bolts 14
when writing scripts, functions, or longer programs, there is sometimes a need to explicitly print
objects because auto-printing does not work in those settings.
When an R vector is printed you will notice that an index for the vector is printed in square brackets
[] on the side. For example, see this integer sequence of length 20.
The numbers in the square brackets are not part of the vector itself, they are merely part of the
printed output.
With R, it’s important that one understand that there is a difference between the actual R object
and the manner in which that R object is printed to the console. Often, the printed output may have
additional bells and whistles to make the output more friendly to the users. However, these bells and
whistles are not inherently part of the object.
Note that the : operator is used to create integer sequences.
5.3 R Objects
Watch a video of this section²
R has five basic or “atomic” classes of objects:
• character
• numeric (real numbers)
• integer
• complex
• logical (True/False)
The most basic type of R object is a vector. Empty vectors can be created with the vector() function.
There is really only one rule about vectors in R, which is that A vector can only contain objects
of the same class.
But of course, like any good rule, there is an exception, which is a list, which we will get to a bit later.
A list is represented as a vector but can contain objects of different classes. Indeed, that’s usually
why we use them.
There is also a class for “raw” objects, but they are not commonly used directly in data analysis and
I won’t cover them here.
²https://youtu.be/vGY5i_J2c-c
R Nuts and Bolts 15
5.4 Numbers
Numbers in R are generally treated as numeric objects (i.e. double precision real numbers). This
means that even if you see a number like “1” or “2” in R, which you might think of as integers, they
are likely represented behind the scenes as numeric objects (so something like “1.00” or “2.00”). This
isn’t important most of the time…except when it is.
If you explicitly want an integer, you need to specify the L suffix. So entering 1 in R gives you a
numeric object; entering 1L explicitly gives you an integer object.
There is also a special number Inf which represents infinity. This allows us to represent entities like
1 / 0. This way, Inf can be used in ordinary calculations; e.g. 1 / Inf is 0.
The value NaN represents an undefined value (“not a number”); e.g. 0 / 0; NaN can also be thought of
as a missing value (more on that later)
5.5 Attributes
R objects can have attributes, which are like metadata for the object. These metadata can be very
useful in that they help to describe the object. For example, column names on a data frame help to
tell us what data are contained in each of the columns. Some examples of R object attributes are
• names, dimnames
• dimensions (e.g. matrices, arrays)
• class (e.g. integer, numeric)
• length
• other user-defined attributes/metadata
Attributes of an object (if any) can be accessed using the attributes() function. Not all R objects
contain attributes, in which case the attributes() function returns NULL.
³https://youtu.be/w8_XdYI3reU
R Nuts and Bolts 16
Note that in the above example, T and F are short-hand ways to specify TRUE and FALSE. However,
in general one should try to use the explicit TRUE and FALSE values when indicating logical values.
The T and F values are primarily there for when you’re feeling lazy.
You can also use the vector() function to initialize vectors.
In each case above, we are mixing objects of two different classes in a vector. But remember that
the only rule about vectors says this is not allowed. When different objects are mixed in a vector,
coercion occurs so that every element in the vector is of the same class.
In the example above, we see the effect of implicit coercion. What R tries to do is find a way to
represent all of the objects in the vector in a reasonable fashion. Sometimes this does exactly what
you want and…sometimes not. For example, combining a numeric object with a character object
will create a character vector, because numbers can usually be easily represented as strings.
Sometimes, R can’t figure out how to coerce an object and this can result in NAs being produced.
When nonsensical coercion takes place, you will usually get a warning from R.
5.9 Matrices
Matrices are vectors with a dimension attribute. The dimension attribute is itself an integer vector
of length 2 (number of rows, number of columns)
Matrices are constructed column-wise, so entries can be thought of starting in the “upper left” corner
and running down the columns.
R Nuts and Bolts 18
Matrices can also be created directly from vectors by adding a dimension attribute.
Matrices can be created by column-binding or row-binding with the cbind() and rbind() functions.
5.10 Lists
Lists are a special type of vector that can contain elements of different classes. Lists are a very
important data type in R and you should get to know them well. Lists, in combination with the
various “apply” functions discussed later, make for a powerful combination.
Lists can be explicitly created using the list() function, which takes an arbitrary number of
arguments.
R Nuts and Bolts 19
[[2]]
[1] "a"
[[3]]
[1] TRUE
[[4]]
[1] 1+4i
We can also create an empty list of a prespecified length with the vector() function
[[2]]
NULL
[[3]]
NULL
[[4]]
NULL
[[5]]
NULL
5.11 Factors
Watch a video of this section⁴
Factors are used to represent categorical data and can be unordered or ordered. One can think of
a factor as an integer vector where each integer has a label. Factors are important in statistical
modeling and are treated specially by modelling functions like lm() and glm().
Using factors with labels is better than using integers because factors are self-describing. Having a
variable that has values “Male” and “Female” is better than a variable that has values 1 and 2.
Factor objects can be created with the factor() function.
⁴https://youtu.be/NuY6jY4qE7I
R Nuts and Bolts 20
Often factors will be automatically created for you when you read a dataset in using a function like
read.table(). Those functions often default to creating factors when they encounter data that look
like characters or strings.
The order of the levels of a factor can be set using the levels argument to factor(). This can be
important in linear modelling because the first level is used as the baseline level.
⁵https://github.com/hadley/dplyr
Another Random Document on
Scribd Without Any Related Topics
considerable amount of leg-spin, would be gradually working away to the
batsman’s off-side every inch of its journey, both before and after pitching.”
Such a break would be liable to lead to a catch at the wicket or in the
slips. It is especially useful in school cricket. School bowlers—and others—
should acquire this action. It is not difficult or exhausting, but it needs a
careful study of field-placing on the on-side.
(4.) To the break given by arm, wrist, and fingers, we may now add the
curl, which some bowlers have or occasionally have, but which few if any
bowlers know how to teach. The following remarks about the American
baseball-pitcher’s curl in the air, produced by a throw, are worth studying.
They are from Mr. Walter Camp’s “Book of College Sports.” I think I am
right in saying that the American curve usually does not come till towards
the end of the ball’s flight.
“The easiest curve, and the one to be acquired first, is the out-curve. The
simplest method is to take the ball in the hand between the extended thumb
and the first and second fingers, the third and little fingers being closed. The
ball rests against the (side of the) middle part of the third finger, but is
firmly clasped by the first two and the thumb. If the arm be then extended
horizontally from the shoulder, with the palm of the hand up, it will be seen
that if the ball were spun like a top by the two fingers and thumb it would
turn in the way indicated by the arrow in the diagram. This is the way it
must twist to accomplish the out-curve. The simpler way to impart this twist
is not the spinning motion, but rather a snap as the ball is leaving the
fingers, performed almost entirely without the aid of the thumb. The
sensation is that of throwing the ball hard, but dragging it back with the
ends and sides of the fingers just as it leaves the hand.” For further
instructions the reader should consult this excellent work, published by the
Century Company of New York.
The writer goes on to remark:—
“The most logical explanation of the curvature of a ball depends upon
the supposition of the compression of the air just in front of the ball and a
corresponding rarefaction immediately behind it, so that the ball by its
friction is deflected from its true course.”
It is interesting to notice that, in contrast with our “batting versus
bowling” problem, “in spite of all restrictions, such is the growing skill of
pitchers that the problem is constantly under discussion how to legislate in
favour of the batsmen.”
(5.) Additional curl or break may be added by the wind, slope of the
ground, and so on.
In all cases, the break must be given especially at the last moment, and
must not be expended in the previous action, unless the object be to deceive
the batsman. Obviously one should not always put on the same amount of
break; one should appear to do so. A straight ball following many breaks
from the off is apt to be very effective.
Now as to the learning of the break, two or three notions seem to me
sheer common sense.
(1.) The muscles of the various mechanisms, and especially of the wrist
and fingers, must be exercised in various ways: by full extensions in
different directions, by full contractions, by partial movements in different
directions, and so on. A certain amount of strength is needed, but let
litheness not be sacrificed.
(2.) Underhand bowling of breaks in either direction not only exercises
these mechanisms, and makes them habitual and easy, but it also shows
effects very clearly. Stump-cricket with an indiarubber ball and underhand
bowling is good training for the bowler’s break as well as for the batsman’s
straight bat.
(3.) Slow bowling is fine for the same reasons. During it the ball is held
longer in the fingers; after it the ball is “held” longer by the ground. Hence
it also shows its effects clearly and encourages the beginner. Moreover, the
slow breaking ball is useful as a change for the medium-paced bowler.
Some of the break thus acquired as an easy habit may be transferred to
medium or fast bowling.
Concealment is of the utmost importance. The extra Commandment,
“Thou shalt not be found out,” is of great moment when once the bowler
has control of the ball’s flight and spin.
To hide direction is hard, unless the curl be used. To hide length and
pace, as Shaw, Spofforth, Lohmann and others used to, is easier: one or two
helps have been offered above. We may notice that Shaw used to alter the
height of his hand: this had several important results; for example, the low
delivery made the ball bump less and “skim” more. Shaw again would bowl
a very effectively concealed variety, a ball rather shorter, rather slower,
rather higher. A great change is not usually so effective as a small one,
except when a very slow or medium bowler occasionally bowls a very fast
ball. In masking these changes, as well as the break, the bowler needs what
XXVII.—Bowler waiting for ball to be thrown in: he is standing well back from the
wicket.
[To face page 91.
Mr. A. G. Steel alludes to as the wiliness of the serpent with the apparent
harmlessness of the dove. He needs complete mastery of this or that part of
the mechanism by itself, so that he may or may not turn his wrist or fingers
at the last moment either completely or partially, but anyhow “with intent to
deceive.” Need a skilful bowler be a skilful liar?
The art of taking balls at the wicket, like the art of fielding balls,
demands a rapid recovery of balance. After his effort the bowler must either
field the ball or else get ready with his wicket between himself and the
fielder. As the photograh (XXVII.) of Hirst shows, he should not stand too
near the wicket, for it is easier to move forward than to move back. He must
also be prepared for a bad throw, either too high or else too low—perhaps a
half-volley or what would be to a batsman a “good length” ball.
The “Badminton Volume” gives this useful advice:—“A golden rule for
every bowler to observe is—after the batsman has played the ball, get back
to the wicket as quickly as possible. Neglect of this rule loses many a ‘run-
out.’ If a bowler does not get back to his wicket, there is no one to take the
ball and knock the bails off should the batsman run and the ball be returned
to the bowler’s end. When the ball is thrown up, the bowler should not take
it till it has just passed the wicket; he should then seize and sweep the ball
into the stumps in one and the same action.”
For the purpose of taking the ball and putting down the wicket rapidly—
in fact almost by a single movement—he cannot do better than practise
wicket-keeping now and then. This should give him hints for bowling also.
It should help him to keep his real eye on the ball and his imaginary eye, his
mind’s eye, on imaginary wickets. He must sense by imagination, and by
“feel,” precisely where the wickets are, just as at Tennis. I have to sense
where the “Grille” or “Dedans” is, even while my real outward eye is on the
ball.
The bowler, like the wicket-keeper, should be an adviser (but with
judgment and tact) to the captain, especially with regard to the throwing in
and backing up by this or that fielder, and the correct placing of all the
fielders, which must depend on circumstances and individual batsmen. This
has brought us to more general remarks on bowling.
GENERAL HINTS.
The first and foremost piece of advice to the would-be bowler, that is to
say to every cricketer, is to read what the great authorities, Messrs. A. G.
Steel, Ranjitsinhji, Grace, the Lytteltons, and others say about the
importance of bowling, and of learning to bowl well or better, not only for
the sake of the game’s future and of the team’s success, but also for the sake
of personal enjoyment. Let the reader digest what Mr. Edward Lyttelton
says about practice in the bedroom, and what Mr. C. B. Fry (in the “Strand”
for July, 1902) says about the helps which he used to his grand athletic
success—for instance, kicking a small ball in a courtyard, and jumping over
an arm-chair. Let every cricketer read how the Americans train for baseball.
Then let him not despise the mastering of the mechanism in his bedroom or
elsewhere, if possible before a large looking-glass. There should be one or
two in every pavilion.
The following advice is not new, but it will all bear repetition. No
amount of honest care spent in suggestions about bowling can be
considered as wasted. The future of enjoyable cricket lies largely with
improvement in bowling.
Be able to bowl round as well as over the wicket, for such a change of
starting-point is almost as good as a change of action. In view of what
certain Americans have achieved in Philadelphia and elsewhere by being
taught the use of the left side (for drawing, modelling, etc.) in early
childhood, I do not hesitate to say, learn to bowl fairly well with the left
hand as well as with the right. The control of the left side would add power
to batting and fielding even if it led to little success in actual bowling.
When you have got the direction and can bowl persistently to the off,
practise the straight and fast yorker as well as the good length ball to the
off. In fact, practise intentional variety; do not rely on the variety which is
incidental to careless and “undisciplined” bowling.
You must have firm feet—the left foot must have nails that bite the
ground well, especially near the boot’s toe; you must have strong hands—
they may be hardened by salt, etc., or, in case of sore places, may be
protected by adhesive plaister round the finger or hand (this prevents
painful friction). Sprains may be treated by water or massage or radiant
light and heat.
Having attended to such things, study pitches—their soft or hard spots,
the trees, etc., behind the bowler’s arm, the direction of the sun, of the wind
—in fact, all details that a careful general must notice. Spofforth used to
make a point of finding out “the pace of the wicket, even if his first effort
cost him dear.” One or two balls just off the pitch, before play begins, may
save such runs. Don’t bowl these or the early ones too fast; the Public
School Racquet representatives at Queen’s slash about from the very
moment that they enter the court. This is silly. Start gently; increase the
severity by degrees.
At the beginning of an innings or of a new batsman’s innings pitch the
ball well up. A yorker is among the most effective attacks (except to W. G.
and a few others); even a half-volley is often useful, or a full-pitch on the
body, but not a long hop.
Correct your mistakes of direction, length, and so on, by exaggerating a
little in the opposite direction.
To a slogger a straight ball—unless it be a yorker—is not the best, as a
rule, especially if he runs out; a ball to the off may be most useful, for a
slogger generally runs out straight down the pitch rather than towards the
side (in which case he would turn an off-ball into a straight ball). With W.
G.’s action round the wicket, a ball on the leg-side may be just the thing. A
break to the off is generally needed, so as to tempt a catch to cover or third
man.
Do not mind having your “head-balls” hit. Mr. A. G. Steel’s words must
be borne in mind constantly, at least for ordinary occasions when the main
object is not to keep the runs down. He says:—“When a bowler is put on to
bowl by his captain, it is his duty to do everything in his power to dislodge
the batsman. It is really quite a secondary consideration for him whether
many or few runs are being made off his bowling.” As a sequel to this, he
urges that “a slow bowler should try every wile that can possibly be
attempted. By adopting slow bowling he has undertaken to use ‘the wisdom
of the serpent’ in the guise of the ‘harmlessness of the dove,’ and has
sacrificed pace to cunning and thought.”
If the bowler be very brave, he will feed the strong stroke of the
batsman. I often find this plan effective in Racquets and Tennis. The
opponent tries “just one too many,” or tries to excel beyond his ability. But
of course it would be a greater error to forget the fieldmen’s poor hands and
to bowl the batsman into practice and sure sight, than it would be to bowl
merely for maidens, unless the other bowler is playing ninepins with the
stumps, or unless defensive bowling is required at the close finish to a
match, or in order to excite a batsman to impatience.
Most experiments should have been already made at the nets or in
practice-games. It is there that you should learn how to lead up to a killing
ball, as the Lawn Tennis or Chess player does, rather than always to spring
the very best on the batsman at once. To plan each ball deliberately
beforehand, to let each have a definite purpose, involves not only these
previous trials, but also a good memory, an absence of hurry, a refusal to
despair.
Despair is almost natural when chances have been missed. I remember a
season of College Cricket during which I got about 130 wickets, and had
over 60 chances missed. I had to console myself by imagining each chance
—mostly to the sleepy slips—to be a wicket. That may console one slightly.
Another consolation is to remember that each fresh batsman is a fresh
beginning to the game. He comes in unready, a hope to the bowler.
Observation and memory have been invaluable helps to me at my own
games. I translate my experiences into Cricket language. From behind the
wicket and elsewhere, observe the commonest hits off the commonest balls
with this or that break, especially when the batsman shapes thus or thus.
Observe how the poking potterer is dismissed by the high full-pitch or by
the ball to entice a catch in the slips—for him you will note in your mind,
“Two short slips and perhaps two square legs.” Watch the fingers of the
nervous batsman grip the bat tight; watch the feet and body shuffle in
anxiety; watch the feeble strokes that result; watch the balls that worry him
most before he gets confidence.
The weak point of a batsman should be the point of most frequent attack,
and that weak point may differ on different days, and according to the
individual batsman’s special frame of mind. “Ah,” I have often thought
when I faced an old opponent, “if only I could tell your strongest and
weakest strokes to-day and now! Will you be slow on your legs now? Will
you neglect that right foot, oh, mine enemy?”
Observe whether the batsman himself is intelligent and observant, or—
what generally amounts to the same thing—practised to the verge of
automatism. Do not assume that every batsman will notice everything that
you are doing. Excessive wiliness is often wasted.
Observe how a player with a certain “stance” will tend to show a certain
fault—as to draw away his right foot. Classify players in groups. Then
when the hitherto new and “unseen” batsman arrives, you may start at an
advantage; you may save yourself unnecessary experimentation.
Make notes of these and other “tips.” Cricket is as well worth notes as
Tennis and Racquets, and my notes for these games have proved of yeoman
service in matches. “How they would give my whole show away!” was the
remark of an American player. “Yes,” I replied, “if anyone had the patience
to use them, he might very soon beat me.” Work out theories; remember the
keenness of Spofforth, who lay awake at nights plotting and planning. Such
imaginations are good for the intellect and (in an obvious way) “a very
present help in time of trouble.” Read, observe, ask pros., veterans, wicket-
keepers. Make notes, recollect, use. Judge by results.
For instance, work out where you will want this and that fielder placed.
Most books give excellent diagrams: Ranjitsinhji’s are the fullest. But do
not be tied down by any such diagram. Be ready to change the positions—
by a word or a movement of the hand—according to individual grounds,
days, batsmen, and so on.
One need not confine one’s practice to the nets and games. These are
indispensable in their place, but not self-sufficient. Practice with a smaller
and softer ball is not to be despised; it will give one freer movements, more
obvious effects in break, and thus more knowledge and confidence. And
one should do the special exercises—and others devised by wiser heads
than mine—before one dares to despair. One must first master the
mechanisms, try several actions, practise with a friend (putting a stump
between oneself and him, and bowling at it alternately with him, a third
enthusiast acting as wicket-keeper), practise needless variety (with wrist or
fingers stiff or loose, and so on). One can give oneself every chance, every
benefit of the doubt. It was years before I learnt to serve at Racquets or
Tennis. I am not nearly at my best yet.
When one is at the nets, one must be independent. One must imagine
oneself bowling in actual overs. One must notice where each ball, sent with
a special purpose, is generally hit. In my practice of Cricket I never did this;
in my practice of my own games I do it with marked results.
Boys should certainly practise, even if they do not regularly play, with a
smaller ball, a smaller bat, a shorter pitch. I wish that the M.C.C.
Committee would study the expressed opinions of Messrs. A. G. Steel,
Ranjitsinhji, Grace and others—elicit the hitherto unexpressed opinions of
other experts; discuss the matter, and then, if it seemed good, issue an
authoritative advice to schoolmasters and others, urging the use of adapted
ball, bat, and pitch. Though any one single measure would not suit all, yet it
would be convenient, and would be a step in the right direction. Let there be
light and small bats and balls.
It would be well also if old players would tell the young player to
practise lobs, to try the W. G. action round the wicket, to master the
mechanisms of ordinary overhand bowling, to avoid excessive pace, and
break; to practise at the nets as if he were bowling in an actual game, only
with more experimentation—to bowl an over, then have a rest; to make
notes; to work out theories; to be keen. A few words from a famous expert
come with a thousand times more force than any amount of advice from the
present writer, even though the latter be stating only most obvious and
incontrovertible truths. For the word of a successful man availeth much.
CHAPTER III.
The future of Cricket lies less perhaps with reform of the game itself than
with more adequate preparation for play, so that each part of each
department of it may be better done—done with more skill, more
enjoyment, more profit. And of all departments fielding needs most care
and favour. It must become so good and so interesting as to be a pride and a
pleasure, instead of—as it now is—a dulness and a drudgery.
The first requisite will be to realise that fielding is complex. Whereas
Cricket is often called a trinity of games, of which one member is fielding,
fielding itself, though regarded as a single occupation, involves a multitude
of arts and too often a multitude of sins. Quite apart from the different
qualities demanded for different places in the field, all fielders alike should
possess certain characteristics in common. In this chapter we shall speak of
fielding in general, referring the reader to the books by Ranjitsinhji and
others for special and exceptional information about special places. Thus
short slip may have to be ready not to move his feet but merely to shift his
weight, whereas cover must be ready to do both.
A few minutes’ study of the photographs of Hirst and Shrewsbury, and of
an actual or imaginary game, will show that as a rule many virtues are
needful. Ranjitsinhji gives the following nine Commandments:—
“There are certain rules which apply to all fieldsmen, viz.:—
1. Keep the legs together when the ball is hit straight to you and while
you are picking it up.
2. Always back up the man who is receiving the ball at the wicket, when
it is thrown in, but not too close.
3. Always try for a catch, however impossible it may seem.
4. Always be on the look-out and ready to start.
5. Run at top speed, but not rashly, the moment the ball is hit.
6. Use both hands whenever possible.
7. Do not get nervous if you make a mistake.
8. Obey your captain cheerfully and promptly.
9. Never be slack about taking up the exact position assigned to you;
never move about in an aimless, fidgetty manner.”
These Commandments apply to the whole side, since, as has been well
said, “In a true sense, the strength of a fielding side must be measured by its
weakest member, as that of a chain is measured by its weakest link. Then,
again, when there is a really bad fielder on a side, more balls seem to go to
him than to any one else. Put him where you will, he seems to attract the
ball.”
Let the reader fancy himself fielding at cover. What must be his habits?
He must be ready to back up the wicket-keeper.
He must be ready to start at once in any direction either with his legs or
with his arm or with both.
He must time the ball; he must also anticipate, his foreknowledge being
based on instinct, observation, and memory.
He may have to run and to run hard.
He may have to move his hands, or one of them, rapidly and accurately
towards the ball’s line of flight; this may involve a bending of trunk, and an
extension of limbs for stooping and stretching.
He must preserve or immediately recover balance.
He must be able to draw back his hands, or one of them, the instant that
the ball has touched them or it. This yielding movement must be timed to a
nicety.
He must grasp the ball either as a catch or as a ball to be thrown in.
In the latter case he must decide to which end, at what pace, etc., he will
throw it in.
He must then throw it in accurately. This last rule of fielding alone
postulates a special and difficult art.
is good except for the feet. It teaches one to bend quickly, to extend
quickly; it cultivates pluck and patience and observation, since the wicket-
keeper must stand firm and wait and watch each ball if he hopes not to be
hurt.
Every cricketer—I would go so far as to say every ordinary human being
—should learn and practise throwing-in. Dr. Grace says that the player
“should practise picking-up and throwing-in underhand.” At first this
should be acquired as a separate accomplishment, till it can be incorporated
and nearly ingrafted into the action of fielding, so that the whole process
may become, as it were, a single movement started half-unconsciously by
the sight of a batsman preparing to strike. The right action for throwing will
be dealt with directly.
Interesting matches will do much to improve the keenness about fielding
and therefore the care given to it. It is mainly because the American School
and University baseball matches are so interesting, so absorbing, that good
fielding is so sedulously sought after. We might arouse and sustain interest
by variety; personally I should like to see handicap-matches occasionally
introduced. A few kinds are suggested in another chapter. Tip-and-run is
excellent training for the batsman as well for the fielders and wicket-keeper.
Subsidiary games and exercises are also essential. In these, as in
matches, there should either be prizes or—as Mr. Edward Lyttelton advises
—“the players should be encouraged to compete for colours to wear, which
need consist of nothing further than a cap of well-marked hue. There is no
reason to underrate the power of this enticement. Human beings have ever
been addicted to ornament, and some have thought that great wars have
been fought for very little else than the difference between one colour and
another. It is quite certain that the authorization of caps for proficiency in
cricket does wonders; and it is a stimulus quite innocent enough to be worth
trying.” The same writer goes on to suggest that “it ought to be possible to
devise a means of a social practice of fielding, which without involving the
waste of time of ordinary match fielding, would ensure to each individual
something to do, and some stimulus to do it.”
We might with advantage study American
XXIX.—Fielding, second position: the hand drawn back behind the ear somewhat
further back than most American Baseball fielders prefer.
[To face page 114.
methods of practice, not with a view to slavish copying, but with a view to
adapted borrowing. Mr. Walter Camp thus describes the method and
apparatus for improving the accuracy of height and of direction; after
remarking that “every one has what may be called a natural way of
throwing the ball, but this so-called natural ‘way’ usually means a perverted
method acquired through carelessness, or attempts to throw too hard before
the arm is sufficiently accustomed to the work,” he points out such faults as
to return the ball before the recovery of balance. He then goes on thus: “To
get an idea of the first steps towards the acquisition of this method, let the
player take the ball in his hand, and, bringing it back level with his ear,
planting both feet firmly, attempt to throw the ball without using the legs or
body. At first the throw is awkward and feeble, but constant practice
speedily results in moderate speed and peculiar accuracy. After steady
practice at this until quite a pace is acquired, the man may be allowed to use
his legs and body to increase the speed, still, however, sticking to the
straight-forward motion of the hand, wrist, and the arm.... There is no delay
caused by drawing back the arm past the head or by turning the body
around, which loses so much valuable time. Its accuracy is due to the fact
that it is easier to aim at an object with a hand in front of the eyes than
when it is out (to the side) beyond the shoulder. One can easily ascertain
this by comparing the ease of pointing the index finger at any object when
the hand is in front of the face, with the difficulty of doing so when the arm
is extended out sideways from the body. Still further, in the almost round-
arm throwing, which many players use, the hand describes an arc, and the
ball must be let go at the proper point to go true. If let go at any other point
in the swing, the throw is certain to be wild.... The majority of the best
throwers in the country use principally the fore-finger and middle finger in
giving direction to the ball.” Mr. Camp then describes the system of hitting
to a number of fielders—this is to be found in some English Schools, but in
America the practisers take it in turn to hit to the others, “the batter being
able to knock high flies, line hits, long flies, and occasionally a sharp hot
grounder; a good man, while avoiding running the men to death, will
XXX.—Waiting for a catch: elbows ready to draw back
slightly the moment the ball touches the hands.
[Between pages 116 and 117.
XXXI.—A one-handed catch: body bent slightly back from
the hips.
[Between pages 116 and 117.
These subjects have been so thoughtfully dealt with in most of the well-
known books on Cricket, that it will be unnecessary here to do more than
sum up what seem to be the most useful points, and to add a few hints.
NOTES ON WICKET-KEEPING.
“The prevailing neglect of wicket-keeping is a gross folly. First as
regards those who are to be regular wicket-keepers, why do they never
practise? Their art is every whit as difficult as batting, and it is astonishing
how its supreme importance to the efficiency of an eleven is overlooked.
There is probably no hope of getting a really good man out on a good
wicket, which can be compared to the chance of his sending a catch to the
wicket-keeper before his eye is in. Sometimes these chances are missed,
and no one notices anything.... Every member of any team would gain if he
were taught how to keep wicket in early youth. In the first place it certainly
helps the eye in batting. The problem of judging pace, pitch, and break is
exactly the same in both cases. Next, it teaches sureness of hand in fielding.
A field who has learnt wicket-keeping must find any catch, especially if it
does not involve running, mere child’s play compared with a chance behind
the sticks. It is impossible that any such continuous exercise of hand and
eye of the most subtle description could be anything but valuable to the
general quickness and sureness both of fielding and batting. Lastly, even if
all the eleven do not learn to keep wicket, there ought always to be one or
more ready to take the place of the regular man, in case of injury or
absence.”—Edward Lyttelton.
In the plea for all-roundness we have already urged that every player
should be able to keep wicket a little, or at any rate should practise with the
ball and stump (see above). Wicket-keeping is useful not only for its own
sake and for the sake of the place which it may bring in the team, but also
as excellent discipline for short slip. The bowler himself must be able to
take the ball when it is thrown in by the fielders—and it is generally thrown
in remarkably badly—and to knock off the bails neatly and surely. The
captain, when he is not a bowler, sees more of the game—the strength or
weakness of the bowling and so on—if he is at the wicket than if he is at
point or elsewhere. As to fielding at mid-off, mid-on, and out in the country,
even for these places wicket-keeping encourages quick bending and
reaching, and general alertness of mind and unflagging attention—merits
which should be but seldom are insisted on in what we may call the
ordinary positions. The wicket-keeper must, in sheer self-defence, be quick
not merely to move but also to anticipate; he must be accurate to time the
ball and to use his wrist and fingers; he must adapt himself readily, as when
a ball is badly sent in by cover; he must observe the bowler and—half
unconsciously—the batsman; he must remember how this or that ball will
break, and so on; he must indeed know the whole game—all this, let us
repeat, if only in self-defence and to save trouble. In contrast to him, the
deep-fielder may go to sleep, or “stug” himself on his heels with legs stiff
and “thinking other things,” without appreciable interest in each and every
ball. The wicket-keeper dares not sleep: it would be as much as his face or
fingers are worth.
The habit of watching each ball carefully, of being ever ready
beforehand, is a habit that every batsman, every fielder and, we may add,
every watcher requires. A personal interest is attached habitually to
absolutely the whole performance and to each of the performers. The
wicket-keeper, whether he be captain or not, takes a more than fatherly
interest in every part of the play, for the sake of himself if not of his team.
Besides this, the almost compulsory pluck, since many balls, like nettles,
hurt less if taken boldly, the balance-shifting, the stooping and stretching
now here, now there, are certainly good for all play as well as for other
games, for physical development, and for health (especially as a preventive
for constipation). Anyone who studies the various positions (in photographs
or in actual play) of Mr. McGregor, of Storer, of any expert, will realise the
truth of this at once.
Nor is it possible, I think, even for a spectator to watch the game
satisfactorily unless he has sometimes stood himself behind the sticks and
seen the play from that point of view. The following hints may be of use to
those who wish to try wicket-keeping.
Every writer advises the wicket-keeper who has taken a ball on the leg-
side to put down the wicket on the chance of the batsman being out of his
ground. This is a good rule, though it is by no means easy to take a ball on
the leg-side, partly because the batsman himself obscures the view. This is
one reason why Hirst suggests that for fast bowling the not over-good
wicket-keeper should stand back unless the batsman often runs out.
To knock off the bails sharply on ordinary occasions is not so easy a
task. It is necessary to be able to take any ball neatly in spite of the break
and the bound. Hence it is good practice to get players to throw balls in to
the wicket from various parts of the field. Such practice helps both wicket-
keeper and fielders, but we never had it at school and of course at a college
no one takes any trouble about fielding. The wicket-keeper can tell the
fielder how and why his throwing is unsatisfactory, and can see that the
other fielders back up properly.
The wicket-keeper should be the adviser of the captain, pointing out to
him these details and also any useful changes of position. He may advise
the bowlers as well—but with discretion, lest he be confounded. Captains
and bowlers do not use their wicket-keeper nearly enough. He ought to be
an invaluable guide-book.
Dr. W. G. Grace describes the wicket-keeper’s position as follows:—
“Their hands are touching each other unless the ball is wide of the
wicket, and catching or stumping is done without any show or fuss. They
always stand with a full front to the bowler, and seldom move the feet
unless the ball is very wide.”
The wicket-keeper has to stretch in various directions with right or left
hand, now up, now down, now straight out. He needs the power of stooping
sideways. At the end of each extension, or at some intermediate place, he
must be able to draw back his hand or hands slightly so that they “give” to
the ball. If one studies the different places at which the ball is taken, one
can soon devise exercises to make the movements of the legs and trunk and
arms easier and quicker. The fast full movements are essential to success.
Boxing would be among the best of trainings for this as for most athletic
skill where large and—with many people—unwieldy limbs have to be
moved rapidly in any one of numerous ways according as the quick eye
shall telegraph to the obedient yet commanding brain.
NOTES ON CAPTAINING, ESPECIALLY AT SCHOOLS.
It often struck me, when I lectured to Civil Service candidates at
Cambridge, that to captain a Cricket or Football team well was an infinitely
better recommendation for a post than to know the dates of all the wars and
battles of the Romans. The former is a test of something more than
phonograph-accuracy. It is a test of leadership—of which virtue the
crammed smug who can only just scrape through the riding examination
may be quite devoid. But the art of captaincy counts nothing here: it only
counts in character and life.
Besides the power to command others, the ideal captain must have all-
round knowledge if he is to be able to find out where lie the strengths and
weaknesses of his team; he should have some practical and personal
acquaintance with all kinds of bowling and fielding as well as with wicket-
keeping and batting, so that he may give timely advice.
There is no need to carry the instructing of a team to an American
Football excess, but a hint from the land of exaggerations may be of use.
The Captain frequently consults every possible authority. Before an
important match—let us say between Harvard and Yale—old boys will
come down and talk over the team and the tactics and arrange special
“plays.” Every Captain should have a Committee which he may consult
when he is in doubt.
While he is choosing his team he should look among the juniors, as Mr.
Lyttelton advises. If he is a School-captain, he may notice two or three boys
keen on fielding and on practice generally (and, by the way, he himself
should set a good example here); perhaps these boys are trying the stump-
practice suggested in a previous chapter. Well, let him decide to turn these
boys into batsmen and bowlers as well, by urging them to whatever helps he
thinks good—perhaps to the practice with a bat along a line chalked on the
floor and to other exercises suggested here. Anyhow he must always be
looking out not only for promising young players, but also for keen young
fielders. The desire for batting or bowling may be taken for granted. It is the
fielders that are wanted. But of course the batting and bowling must be duly
considered. There should be at least one left-handed bowler. And there
should assuredly be an extra wicket-keep. Since the weather is so prominent
a factor in the game, and as some players are almost hopeless on a difficult
wicket, it might be suggested that the eleven for the most important matches
should have a wider margin for choice than is usual, though the possible
names must, for the sake of convenience, be decided on at least by the
previous day. So much for the choice of the team; and now for its practice.
As the team need not be decided on finally, till as late as possible, so
neither need be the positions of its members in the field, nor the order of
going in. The positions and the order should be occasionally changed.
The captain should insist on punctuality, on neatness of clothing, perhaps
even—if he dare—on clean hands as well as a pure heart, and certainly on
keenness. At school he should try to get the most distinguished old boys to
say a few words to the eleven.
He should also insist on all-roundness; he should insist that every
member occasionally keep wicket, and (as we have said above)
occasionally field in a place not his own, and occasionally bowl, and
occasionally bat under difficulties—as with a broom-stick at stump-cricket
or “snob.” Nothing more quickly reveals the crooked bat. The captain
himself should practise all these things, and especially fielding: otherwise
what right has he to curse? If he sees the interest flagging, he should
arrange more exciting matches. And he might do worse than devise some
system of handicaps.
When the members of a visiting eleven have arrived, the captain’s first
thought must be for them: he must put himself in their place. He may
delegate his duties to the second or third man in his team, so that he may
attend to the details of the ground and the play.
Before and during a home or “foreign” match he must set an example of
careful training and pure living, making it clear that excess is not manliness.
He must not be a prig: he need not say, “Don’t do that”; he can say, “I
shouldn’t do that if I were you.” He is not a schoolmaster, and, even if he
were, he might do worse than use that turn of phrase.
If he wins the toss, he should probably put his own side in. Many hold
this to be a rule without exception. Anyhow, he should inspect the ground
and notice any peculiarities of light, etc.
During the play he must be watchful of all sorts of things, and in the
field he should therefore be as near to the wicket as possible. Point is a
good place; wicket-keeping is still better, for then he can judge of the
bowling and give hints to the bowlers. If he himself be a bowler he should
have a candid friend who isn’t one; this candid friend must be consulted.
Other hints are given in abundance by the many well-known writers on
the game; to whose books we can safely refer the reader for such hints as
that the fast bowler should be put on against the tail of the enemy; that the
erratic bowler may be put on to break up a well-set pair.
These books the captain must read for himself. He must make notes from
them, unless he has a superlative memory. He must think. He must observe.
He must be tactful without weakness. Indeed, he should be far the most
intelligent man in the eleven; and, if he is, he is probably worth his place in
the eleven even if the utmost that he can do is to eat and drink in sensible
moderation, and watch and field with unflagging energy.
NOTES ON IMPLEMENTS.
One of the ablest of writers on Cricket, Mr. W. J. Ford, suggests “what
the cricket-bag should contain, apart from the actual weapons of offence
and defence.” He says: “It is a great addition to one’s comfort to have spare
socks and handkerchiefs (we may add vest and shirt) on board; a small
bandage is often useful, especially adhesive bandage. If you are lumbagic or
rheumatic, don’t omit a cholera belt of red flannel, and do not forget to put
it on when you come in steaming from a century, and have to sit in a
draughty pavilion. Sticking-plaster is often useful, so is a hair-brush,
likewise bags for boots; nothing is gained by mixing up muddy boots with
flannels, sweater, and blazer. Add a button-hook and shoe-horn.”
Boots are generally admitted to be preferable to shoes. They should be
easy, but not too easy. The American pattern of boot is among the best,
though anything more hideous than the black Lawn Tennis horror it would
be impossible to conceive. The boots must be white. A high authority says
that they need not have many nails, but too many nails are better than too
few, lest one trip or slip when one turns. It is common sense, as Shrewsbury
says, to put two near the toe, as runners do. Extra nails should be kept in the
cricket-bag, with the means for inserting them. A good nail is the
sparrowbill (from Shaw and Shrewsbury, Queen’s Square, Nottingham), or
the Nottingham nail.
Clothing in general, as Ranjitsinhji says, should satisfy the demands of
“ease, convenience, and comfort, as well as of health and cleanliness. The
shirt ought to be of canvas, wool, or flannel: flannel is always preferable if
the wearer can put up with the irritation. Both trousers and shirt should be
made to fit loosely, not flappingly. Boys are in the habit of putting on belts.
This is a mistake, since the noise the belt makes may at times be mistaken
for a catch at the wicket. I advise instead scarves or sashes, which also have
a smarter appearance.” So far as health is concerned, the flannel shirt
(which is worn by most professionals) renders the wearer less liable to chill
after a sweat, but hardens him far less than the linen shirt. Under either can
be worn a vest, after the habit of Shrewsbury and others, if the weather is at
all cold. The sash is not healthy, even though it is smarter than the belt—
which, by the way, need not be at all noisy.
Clean flannels should be used as often as possible, since to wear things
already rich in waste-products is not for the best. And flannels should never
be kept in closed apartments. At Columbia University, in America, the
lockers had wire trellis-work and not wooden covers, and the small
changing room for hundreds of men was quite free from disagreeable smell.
In case of severe heat a light sun-hat is safe.
In case of cold weather a sweater is usual. To field well with cold hands
is a miracle. At the beginning of the season thick kid gloves might be worn,
as they are by Abel and Shrewsbury; or at least they can be made to cover
those parts of the hand that blister most readily. Adhesive plaister round the
finger will save friction if a blister has already formed and burst or been
pricked.
The pads should be carefully chosen with a view to ease and lightness as
well as protection. Shrewsbury’s idea of an extra piece to protect the knee is
to be commended. Otherwise let the pads be only just thick and heavy
enough to give the feeling and the reality of safety. The fastenings should be
good and not of inferior leather or elastic.
Here as elsewhere this advice holds good, to choose your implements for
yourself; try before you buy; treat them with respect; learn how to mend
them; carry about the means of mending them. A “housewife” with needles,
good thread, scissors, safety pins, etc., will be invaluable. With a view to
care and cleanliness, keep your best bat in some sort of a cover.
As to the bat, for men and full-sized boys its weight might be 24½ to 25
oz., but that is less important than the ease with which the blade of the bat
rises. For a very slow wicket an extra 1½ to 2 oz. might be advisable, and
hence at least two bats may be taken in the bag, if only in case of change of
weather. But a comfortable feel is the great requisite, a comfortable feel not
merely as you stand and hold the bat but also as you move and use the bat.
If you have active feet and good shoulders and trunk then you may manage
a heavier bat than if you have less active feet and a weaker forearm and
wrist. The handle should bend lithely backwards and forwards rather than
sideways. It can be made thicker by wash-leather if the hands are moist; and
if they are wet, by the rubber covering, which adds over an ounce of weight
to the bat and thus helps the blade to rise. The wood of the bat is often
found to be cut away from all the bat except just the part with which one
hopes to stroke the ball. This, as Shrewsbury says, is not desirable, since
one cannot always judge the rise of the ball absolutely, and though a stroke
with the extra-fat part of the blade may be “very, very nice,” the stroke with
the thin part may be “horrid.” Shrewsbury’s bats are less exaggerated, so
that they allow the batsman more surface to drive well with.
The blade should be oiled say once a fortnight, but not too heavily, lest
the driving power be decreased. One needs a nice soft bat which after use
shall show not cracks but dents—a bat which shall have a slightly hollowed
middle-blade. In its infancy, use it with soft old balls by preference; train it
gently as a boxer might train his face to receive hard blows. Notice where
the dents come, and correct your play accordingly; those which are off the
best driving part are like the blue marks of the schoolmaster’s pencil. When
the bat is injured, use string-binding in preference to pegs; learn how to do
that string-binding, and keep a little string in your bag.
In your bag keep also a comfortable pair of batting-gloves and a ball.
“Neither a borrower nor a lender be”; certainly never lend a ball. I would
add also a Lawn Tennis ball and a stick; the latter if only in case of a walk
in new country, the former in case of a wet day when Snob-cricket is far
better than loafing. Every pavilion should allow of this game, as every ship
should allow of deck Cricket. The game should be played with a soft ball
and stick or stump, not with a hard ball and bat.
If you take a favourite book also, a Membook or Diary with a pencil, and
also a complete list of all the things you want in the bag, so that you never
have to borrow what may not fit you, or be as the foolish virgins, you will
be better off than nine out of ten cricketers are.
CHAPTER V.
“The right and proper thing would be for cricketers to pay equal attention to
bowling, batting, and fielding, especially in their young days. All are
equally essential parts of the game. Why not regard them as equally
valuable? The doctrine of the division of labour holds good in cricket as
elsewhere, but every cricketer should, as far as lies in him, qualify himself
for every emergency. Most amateurs take no trouble whatever with their
bowling, except in matches.”—Ranjitsinhji.
I have heard it said that Richter, the great conductor, could himself play
every instrument used in his own orchestra, so that at once he knew where
and how the general effect was weak. On the same principle the captain of a
team should as a rule be an all-round player—a batsman, bowler, fielder,
watcher—though there are some captains who do not excel much in any
sphere except captaining, and yet are worth their place in their team.
But it is not merely the captain who gains by being an all-round player.
Cricket has as its object to fit every cricketer for his all-round life, as games
and exercises prepare young animals for their narrower life. We have used
games with this result if not with this object for generations past; year by
year, whether we know it or not, we shall have to rely on them more and
more. And anyhow a certain time, perhaps amounting to hundreds of hours,
is sure to be given to the play. Therefore it is as well to get the most that we
can out of that time, and to get the most that we can out of each department
of Cricket; in the spirit of Shrewsbury, studying it as a pleasant art; with
Abel, entering into it keenly and smartly; and, like Hirst, aiming at many-
sided excellence.
We cannot all be Hirsts, F. S. Jacksons, J. R. Masons, T. Haywards, A. G.
Steels, and so on; that is obvious. But most players are content never to try,
or else to try wrongly and then give up. There never was a greater error.
Let us consider batting alone. Even for successful and therefore
enjoyable batting (batting has been, is, and will be most enjoyed and most
sought after, and therefore has been, is, and will be least uncultivated; many
cultivate nothing besides), even for this we need more than practice at a net
or in a game, indispensable as these are in their proper place.
First of all, unless we are genius-players, we need a knowledge of
bowling; we need not only to see the bowler’s wrist and fingers, but also to
get an idea of what will happen to the ball when it has left the fingers. In
Tennis I never knew what was going to happen to a service until I learnt
how to serve. Otherwise I played as if there would be no special cut or twist
or drag. So practice in bowling may give the best knowledge of bowling for
the batsman’s purpose. Take a Lawn Tennis ball, and study the ways of
producing various breaks, etc.—I recommend a Lawn Tennis ball because it
shows the break more clearly, and can be used in a room; then produce
these breaks with a Cricket ball (don’t let it loose) before a large mirror.
After a time you will know what to expect when you see certain signs, such
as the middle and third finger curled inwards against the bowler’s palm.
Besides, when you have yourself bowled certain balls, you will know where
the batsman generally hits them, and what faults he generally makes. You
can avoid these faults, while on the other hand you can see at once, when
you go in, where the fielding offers a gap. It is not every bowler who knows
his own weak spots.
As a wicket-keeper one might learn still more about batting than one
could as a bowler. It is amazing to me that so few wicket-keepers can bat
even with moderate success. They seem to degenerate, like the idle
watchers, with too much watching and too much “knowledge!” The wicket-
keeper sees most of the game, and especially the batsman’s faults and the
bowler’s merits of break, spin, change of pace, and so on. He has to watch
the bowler’s wrist and fingers. He should know precisely what balls should
be left alone.
Only a few degrees less useful for batting is a knowledge of fielding in
all parts of the field, though every fielder should have one or two
specialities. The good fielder, when he bats, can remember the curl of the
ball hit to third man; he can observe cover-point’s attitude of slackness and
steal an easy run, for he knows that a sloucher cannot run him out.
And to watch a game well—that may be as valuable a help for batting as
bowling, wicket-keeping, or fielding. Shrewsbury will observe the play and
its many niceties—the duel between a good bowler and a good batsman—
from various parts of the field as he walks about; he will study length, pace,
Welcome to our website – the ideal destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. With a mission to inspire endlessly, we offer a
vast collection of books, ranging from classic literary works to
specialized publications, self-development books, and children's
literature. Each book is a new journey of discovery, expanding
knowledge and enriching the soul of the reade
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
textbookfull.com