Clinical Study Protocol
Clinical Study Protocol
Blinding Procedures
Blinding is used to prevent bias in the study. It means the investigator (doctor/researcher) and/or
the subject (participant) do not know which treatment (drug or placebo) is being given.
Example:
In a double-blind study, neither the doctor nor the patient knows if the patient is receiving the
actual drug or a placebo. This ensures the results are not influenced by expectations.
Un-blinding Procedures
Un-blinding means revealing which treatment was given. This is done only in specific situations
where it is absolutely necessary, like a medical emergency where the doctor needs to know the
treatment to provide proper care.
Example:
If a participant has a severe reaction, the doctor can access a secure code to find out whether the
participant was taking the drug or a placebo. This process is tightly controlled to maintain the
integrity of the study.
This section explains how the study will be supervised to ensure everything is done correctly and
according to regulations.
1. Monitoring Visits:
o The plan includes how often study sites will be checked (e.g., weekly or monthly).
o Monitoring will be performed by specific individuals, such as a Clinical Research
Associate (CRA).
Example: "Site monitoring visits will occur every two weeks and will be conducted by
the designated CRA."
Example: "CRFs must be completed within 24 hours of the study visit. One copy goes to
the sponsor, and another stays with the investigator."
3. CRF Corrections:
o Only authorized personnel can correct CRF entries, and all changes must be properly
documented.
o A process for handling questions or errors in the data is outlined.
Example: "Corrections must be made by the investigator, initialed and dated, with a note
explaining the change."
Example: "All study files will be stored in a secure location for five years after study
completion."
This ensures that the study is conducted properly, data is accurate, and records are maintained for
future reference or audits.
This section explains how the study's data will be evaluated to draw reliable conclusions about
the drug's safety and effectiveness.
1. Statistical Approach:
o Sample Size:
Describes how many participants are needed for the study and why.
Includes assumptions, like the expected effect size and variability, used to
calculate the number of participants.
Example: "A sample size of 200 participants was calculated to detect a
20% improvement in symptom reduction with 80% power and a
significance level of 0.05."
o Efficacy Endpoints:
Identifies the primary goal of the study (e.g., improvement in symptoms)
and secondary goals (e.g., quality of life improvements).
Example: "The primary endpoint is a 30% reduction in pain score;
secondary endpoints include improved mobility scores."
o Safety Endpoints:
Defines how safety will be assessed (e.g., frequency of side effects).
Example: "Safety endpoints include the incidence of adverse events and
changes in liver enzyme levels."
2. Statistical Analysis:
o Methods:
Explains how data will be analyzed and which statistical tests will be used.
Example: "The primary endpoint will be analyzed using a t-test, while
secondary endpoints will use ANOVA."
o Significance Level:
Defines the threshold for statistical significance (e.g., p < 0.05).
o Handling Missing Data:
Details methods for addressing incomplete data, such as imputation or
exclusion.
Example: "Missing data will be handled using multiple imputation
techniques."
o Treatment Failures, Non-Compliance, and Withdrawals:
Describes how these issues will be tracked and included in the analysis.
Example: "Participants who withdraw will be analyzed on an intent-to-
treat basis."
o Interim Analysis:
If planned, explains when and why data will be analyzed during the study
(e.g., for early stopping rules).
Example: "Interim analysis will be performed after 50% of participants
have completed the study to evaluate efficacy."
o Pharmacokinetics (PK):
If applicable, describes statistical methods for analyzing drug levels in the
body.
Example: "PK data will be evaluated using non-compartmental analysis to
determine the area under the curve (AUC)."
Additional Sections
The investigator provides a formal declaration agreeing to conduct the study according to
ethical and regulatory standards.
16. Appendices:
Here’s a simpler breakdown of what’s being asked in the "Data Analysis" section:
Sample Size:
o You need to explain how many participants (patients) are required in the study
and why.
o For example, you might calculate that you need 200 participants based on factors
like how large the expected treatment effect is (e.g., how much improvement you
expect) and the level of variability in the data.
o You also mention any assumptions made while determining this number, such as
the expected difference between the treatment and placebo, and the desired
confidence level (e.g., 95%).
Efficacy Endpoints:
o Primary Endpoint: This is the main goal of the study (e.g., reduction in pain,
survival rate). It's the most important outcome you will measure to determine if
the treatment works.
o Secondary Endpoints: These are additional, less critical goals (e.g., quality of
life, additional symptoms) that will be measured to support the main findings.
Safety Endpoints:
o These are measurements of safety, like adverse effects or complications that
might occur during the study (e.g., the rate of side effects from the treatment).
2. Statistical Analysis:
In short, this section explains how you will analyze the data from the study, decide how many
participants to include, define the goals you want to achieve, and make sure the results are
accurate by handling missing or incomplete data. It also ensures that the analysis methods are
clearly defined so that the study’s findings are trustworthy and valid.