Hamlet Lecture Notes 1-8
Hamlet Lecture Notes 1-8
Günekan 1
Francisco
states:
“It’s
bitterly
cold
out,
and
I’m
depressed”
(1.1.6).
This
mood
predominates
most
of
the
characters
in
the
play.
As
Barnardo
asks
if
Horatio
is
there,
Horatio
answers
him
with
a
bitter
joke:
“A
piece
of
him”
(1.1.17).
The
phrase
“a
piece
of
him”
might
indicate
that
Horatio
is
offering
his
hand
to
greet
the
guard
and
that
the
cold
has
reduced
him
to
a
fragment,
which
is
his
hand.
Yet,
the
phrase
also
implies
that
this
is
just
a
piece
of
him,
a
shrunken
version
of
his
self
because
he
unintentionally
expresses
the
fragmented
state
of
this
society,
which
is
ruled
by
Claudius,
the
deceitful
brother
of
the
late
king.
The
odd
thing
is
that
the
guards
are
armed
and
nervous
as
they
do
not
know
the
reason
why
they
keep
the
watch.
Later,
Marcellus
wants
to
know
the
reason
why
Denmark
is
in
a
state
of
military
alert.
The
fact
that
the
guards
are
supposed
to
protect
the
castle
against
an
unknown
danger
makes
the
audience
question
the
validity
of
Claudius’
kingship
as
the
guards
are
left
in
an
ambiguous
state
at
this
moment.
They
learn
from
Horatio
that
young
Fortinbras
is
planning
to
attack
Elsinore
to
avenge
his
father,
the
late
king
of
Norway.
Act
I,
Scene
I
provides
us
with
an
unfolding
of
Denmark’s
recent
political
history.
Along
with
the
war
preparations,
we
learn
about
the
previous
war
between
Hamlet
senior
and
Fortinbras
senior.
The
dead
king
Hamlet
defeated
and
killed
Fortinbras,
the
late
king
of
Norway,
and
won
parts
of
Norway.
Young
Fortinbras
intends
to
avenge
his
father
and
gain
the
lost
territories
by
force
(1.1.79-‐106).
Looking
at
Horatio’s
account,
we
should
also
question
the
validity
of
Hamlet
senior
in
his
political
decisions
because
he
threw
his
people
to
the
wolves
waging
a
war
with
Fortinbras
senior
who
dared
the
late
king
to
combat
(1.1.80-‐89).
We
might
consider
Hamlet
senior
to
be
an
irresponsible
king
for
accepting
the
late
king
of
Norway’s
challenge.
Even
though
Hamlet
senior
gained
victory,
he
accomplished
this
at
the
cost
of
his
men’s
lives.
We
also
learn
that
the
guards
and
Horatio
want
to
question
the
Ghost
who
has
appeared
at
the
battlements
twice
before.
The
Ghost
looks
like
the
former
king
Hamlet,
but
they
are
not
sure
whether
it
is
the
former
king’s
ghost
or
an
evil
spirit
who
has
come
to
deceive
them
in
the
late
king’s
disguise.
In
any
case,
they
recognize
his
kingship
because
the
Ghost
appears
in
full
armour
as
Horatio
states:
“The
king
was
wearing
exactly
this
armour
when
he
fought
the
king
of
Norway.
And
the
ghost
frowned
just
like
the
king
did
once”
(1.1.60-‐61).
The
unidentified
state
of
the
Ghost’s
presence
will
be
unfolded
by
young
Günekan
3
Hamlet,
as
the
Ghost
will
later
inform
him
about
his
uncle’s
betrayal
and
usurpation
of
the
throne.
In
the
play,
the
issue
of
unfolding
is
not
only
about
disclosing
one’s
identity,
but
also
telling
one’s
story.
Act
1,
Scene
2:
from
state
politics
into
family
dynamics
We
see
in
the
second
scene
that
the
parents
endeavour
to
contain
and
control
the
behaviour
and
decision
of
their
children.
Following
this
scene,
personal
and
familial
issues
are
always
connected
to
power
and
politics
in
he
play.
Claudius,
the
new
king
of
Denmark,
gathers
his
subjects
and
acknowledges
their
recent
support
of
his
succession
to
the
throne.
We
gradually
get
to
know
the
characters
and
learn
about
their
intentions
through
their
dialogues
and
the
way
they
present
themselves.
Remember
that
language
defines
so
many
things
in
this
play.
Looking
at
Claudius’
first
speech,
we
immediately
suspect
his
public
face.
In
showing
them
his
gratitude,
the
king
reminds
his
councillors
that
they
have
approved
of
his
marriage
to
the
widow
Queen
and
his
kingship.
In
this
way,
he
demonstrates
his
political
skill
to
persuade
his
subjects
and
gives
a
positive
spin
to
his
delicate
position.
For
instance,
we
see
his
rhetorical
skill
in
the
way
he
defines
their
war-‐like
condition.
He
points
out
that
he
joins
forces
with
Gertrude,
‘the
imperial
jointress’,
because
it
is
a
wise
thing
to
do
in
these
times
of
conflict
between
Denmark
and
Norway.
He
makes
the
marriage
seem
like
a
political
decision
that
has
been
taken
for
the
sake
of
bringing
stability
and
order
to
Denmark
as
they
are
on
the
verge
of
battle
with
young
Fortinbras.
Using
royal
‘we’
in
his
speech,
Claudius
calls
attention
to
his
present
state
of
royalty
and
eliminates
the
possibility
that
his
actions
and
decisions
derive
from
personal
ambition.
He
defines
his
succession
to
the
throne
as
an
occurrence
“with
mirth
in
funeral
and
with
dirge
in
marriage”
(1.2.12).
At
this
point
remember
that
usually
marriage
is
associated
with
mirth
and
funeral
with
dirge,
not
the
other
way
around.
Thus,
Claudius
presents
himself
as
a
sincere
and
mindful
king
to
his
subjects
and
influences
their
thought
and
emotions
skilfully
to
avoid
any
questioning
of
his
hasty
marriage
and
kingship.
He
always
uses
such
antithetical
statements
and
tries
to
soften
the
situation.
Günekan
4
After
Claudius
sends
ambassadors
to
Norway
to
stop
young
Fortinbras’
attack,
he
gives
permission
to
Laertes
to
return
to
France.
Here,
we
learn
that
Laertes
follows
the
authority
of
the
new
king
and
avoids
any
conversation
about
the
death
of
the
late
king:
“France,
which
I
left
to
come
to
Denmark
for
your
coronation”
(1.2.52-‐3).
He
neither
mentions
the
funeral
nor
offers
his
condolences
even
though
the
late
king
was
Claudius’
brother.
As
such,
Laertes
appears
to
be
a
character
that
adheres
to
the
authority
of
the
new
king
and
he
immediately
demonstrates
his
loyalty
by
only
focusing
on
the
coronation
of
the
new
king.