LAW. NATURE.

FUNCTION 3
Nature of Law 3

Functions of Law in Human Society 3

Legal Systems 4
Common Law System 4

Personal laws 5

Statutory law 5

Civil Law 6

Criminal Law 6

Administrative Law 7

Public Law 7

Private Law 8
Difference btwn CIVIL AND COMMON LAW SYSTEM 8
Sources of law 9
Classification of Sources of Law according to Salmond: 10
CUSTOMS 12
PRECEDENT THEORY 13
LEGISLATION 14
JURISDICTION 14
Challenges of the Judicial System in India 15
STAGES OF CIVIL CASES IN INDIA 16
STAGES OF CRIMINAL CASES IN INDIA 18
FALLACIES 20
Doctrinal Research 22
Non-Doctrinal Research 23
Law as a Social and Behavioral Science 24
Delegated Legislation 25
Reasons for Delegated Legislation 26
Safeguards against the Delegated Legislation 26

Page 1 of 30
Legal reasoning 27
Deductive Method 28

Inductive Method 28
Hierarchy of Courts 29

Page 2 of 30
LAW. NATURE. FUNCTION
Law is a set of rules created and enforced by the state to regulate human behavior and
maintain order in society. It is designed to ensure justice, equality, and fairness among
individuals. Sir John Salmond defines law as “the body of principles recognized and applied
by the state in the administration of justice.” In simple terms, law provides guidelines for
acceptable behavior and consequences for violations, ensuring that society functions
smoothly.

Nature of Law
1. Dynamic and Ever-Changing:
Law evolves with society. As societal values, technological advancements, and
cultural norms change, so do the laws. For example, modern laws on cybercrime and
data protection have emerged to address new-age challenges.

2. Universal in Application:
Law applies equally to everyone, regardless of social, economic, or political status.
This universality ensures fairness and prevents discrimination in legal matters.

3. Backed by Authority:
Law derives its authority from the state, meaning that its enforcement is supported by
courts, police, and other government institutions. Without this backing, laws would
lose their effectiveness.

4. Regulatory in Nature:
Law controls and guides human actions to prevent chaos and ensure harmony in
society. It dictates what is permissible and what is not, offering a framework for
social behavior.

5. Coercive but Just:

Law carries an element of compulsion, as it imposes penalties on those who violate
it. However, it is also rooted in the idea of justice, aiming to protect the rights of all
individuals.

Functions of Law in Human Society

1. Maintaining Order and Stability:
Law prevents anarchy by setting clear rules for behavior and resolving disputes
effectively. It ensures that individuals follow rules, reducing conflicts and
maintaining social stability. Without laws, society would descend into chaos.

2. Protecting Rights and Liberties:

The law safeguards the fundamental rights and freedoms of individuals. It prevents
exploitation, discrimination, and abuse of power. For example, constitutional rights
like the right to equality and freedom of speech are protected by law.
Page 3 of 30
 3. Resolving Disputes:
Law provides mechanisms such as courts and tribunals to resolve conflicts between
individuals, groups, or even the state. It ensures disputes are settled fairly and
impartially, preventing them from escalating into violence.

4. Promoting Social Justice:

Laws are often created to reduce inequality and uplift marginalized sections of
society. For instance, laws against untouchability, reservations in education and jobs,
and labor protection laws aim to create a more just society.

5. Encouraging Social Progress:

Law promotes societal development by addressing modern issues such as
environmental protection, gender equality, and technological advancements. Laws
like the Environmental Protection Act and the Information Technology Act show how
legal systems adapt to societal growth.

6. Providing Security:
Laws ensure that people feel safe by protecting them from harm. Criminal laws
punish offenders and deter others from committing crimes, while civil laws ensure
personal and property rights are upheld.

7. Establishing Accountability:
The law holds individuals, organizations, and the state accountable for their actions.
It ensures that no one is above the law, fostering a sense of responsibility and
discipline in society.

8. Reflecting Social Values:

Law often mirrors the moral and ethical values of society. It codifies what is
considered right and wrong, providing a standard for acceptable behavior. For
example, laws against theft or murder align with society's basic ethical principles.

Legal Systems
Common Law System
The Common Law System in India is a significant part of the country’s legal framework. It
was introduced during British rule and continues to play an important role in shaping the
country’s laws. The system relies on judicial decisions and precedents to guide legal
rulings, ensuring consistency and fairness in the application of the law.

The origin of the common law system in India can be traced back to British rule. When the
British ruled India, they brought their legal system with them, which was based on common
law principles. These principles included the use of precedents, meaning that the decisions
made by higher courts should be followed by lower courts in similar cases. This helps
ensure uniformity in the legal system.
Page 4 of 30
A key feature of the common law system is the reliance on judicial precedents. A precedent
is a decision made by a higher court, which sets a legal principle that lower courts must
follow in future cases with similar facts. This helps create consistency and predictability in
the law, as lower courts look to higher court decisions when making their rulings. In India,
the decisions made by the Supreme Court are binding on all other courts.
The judiciary plays a crucial role in the common law system. Judges in India do not just
apply laws; they also interpret and develop the law through their decisions. This makes
the judiciary an important part of the lawmaking process. Indian courts have the power of
judicial review, which allows them to check if laws passed by the government are in line
with the Constitution. This ensures that laws do not violate the fundamental rights of
citizens.

Common law also allows the law to evolve with society. Courts can adapt the law to new
situations and issues that arise. This flexibility ensures that the law remains relevant and can
address changes in technology, culture, and society.

Personal laws
Personal laws in India are laws that govern the personal matters of individuals, such as
marriage, divorce, inheritance, and adoption, based on their religious beliefs and customs.
These laws are separate from the general laws that apply to all citizens, and they vary
depending on the religion or community an individual belongs to. Personal laws in India
have evolved to address the diverse and multicultural nature of the country, ensuring that
individuals can follow the customs and practices of their faiths when it comes to personal
matters.

Hindu Law
Hindu personal laws are based on ancient scriptures and traditions. These laws deal with
issues like marriage, inheritance, and adoption. The Hindu Marriage Act of 1955, for
instance, governs the marriage and divorce of Hindus, while the Hindu Succession Act of
1956 deals with inheritance and property rights. These laws were codified by the
government to bring some level of uniformity and to address issues such as gender equality
within the Hindu community.

Under Hindu personal law, marriage is seen as a sacred union, and the laws surrounding it
include rules about consent, age, and social obligations. The Hindu Marriage Act introduced
provisions like the minimum age for marriage, which was not clearly defined in earlier
customs. Similarly, the Hindu Succession Act addressed issues related to inheritance,
particularly ensuring that daughters also have rights to ancestral property, which was a
significant reform compared to previous laws that largely favored sons.

Statutory law
Statutory law refers to laws that are written and enacted by a legislative body, such as
Parliament or a state legislature. These laws are formalized in statutes and are passed to

Page 5 of 30
address specific issues, regulate behavior, and provide guidelines for governance. Statutory
law is an essential part of a country's legal system and often operates alongside common law
and constitutional law.

Statutory laws serves several important purposes. First, they provide a clear and specific
set of rules that apply to various aspects of society, such as crime, commerce, family
matters, and more. For example, the Indian Penal Code (IPC) is a statutory law that defines
crimes and their punishments. Second, statutory laws can offer protections and rights to
citizens, as seen in laws like the Right to Information Act (RTI), which ensures transparency
in government functioning. Third, statutory laws are often created to address gaps in
existing legal systems or to respond to changing societal needs, such as the Goods and
Services Tax (GST) Act, which streamlined India's tax system

One of the main advantages of statutory law is that it is written and easy to access. People
can know and understand the laws that apply to them because they are formally published
and available. Additionally, statutory law can be amended or repealed when necessary,
allowing the legal system to adapt to new challenges or changing societal values.

Civil Law
Civil law deals with disputes between individuals, organizations, or both, where no
criminal offense is involved. It focuses on protecting the private rights of individuals and
providing remedies to resolve conflicts. Common areas under civil law include contracts,
property disputes, torts (civil wrongs like negligence), family matters (such as divorce or
custody), and inheritance.

The primary goal of civil law is not to punish but to compensate the aggrieved party or
enforce agreements. For instance, if a party fails to fulfill the terms of a contract, the injured
party can file a civil lawsuit seeking compensation or specific performance of the contract.
Similarly, in property disputes, civil law helps to determine rightful ownership or resolve
boundary issues. The remedies in civil cases typically involve monetary compensation,
injunctions, or declarations of rights.

Civil law cases are governed by procedural laws such as the Code of Civil Procedure
(CPC) in India. These laws provide detailed rules for filing suits, presenting evidence, and
conducting trials. The burden of proof in civil cases is lower than in criminal cases,
requiring proof on a "balance of probabilities.”

Criminal Law
Criminal law addresses offenses that harm society, individuals, or the state, and it
prescribes punishments for those who commit such offenses. It defines what constitutes a
crime and lays down the procedures for prosecuting and punishing offenders. Examples of
criminal offenses include theft, murder, assault, fraud, and corruption.

Page 6 of 30
The main objectives of criminal law is to maintain public order, deter wrongdoing,
rehabilitate offenders, and provide justice to victims. For instance, someone convicted of
theft may face imprisonment or fines to both penalize the act and discourage future thefts.
Criminal laws are codified in statutes like the Indian Penal Code (IPC), while the procedural
aspects are governed by the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).

Criminal cases requires a higher standard of proof than civil cases. The prosecution
must establish the guilt of the accused "beyond a reasonable doubt." This ensures that
innocent individuals are not wrongfully punished. Criminal law often involves two parties:
the state (prosecution) representing society and the accused (defense). Penalties under
criminal law can include imprisonment, fines, community service, or even capital
punishment in extreme cases

Administrative Law
Administrative law governs the actions of government agencies and public officials,
ensuring they act within their powers and comply with the law. It deals with the decision-
making processes of administrative bodies, such as issuing licenses, enforcing regulations,
or imposing penalties. Administrative law ensures that these actions are legal, reasonable,
and fair.
In India, administrative law plays a crucial role in regulating the activities of government
authorities. For example, agencies responsible for taxation, public health, or environmental
protection must act in accordance with the principles of administrative law. If a public
authority oversteps its powers or acts arbitrarily, citizens can challenge these actions through
mechanisms like writ petitions under Articles 32 or 226 of the Indian Constitution.

Administrative law often relies on quasi-judicial bodies like tribunals, which specialize in
resolving disputes in specific areas such as labor issues, tax matters, or environmental
concerns. The role of administrative law is not only to check misuse of power but also to
streamline governance by providing clear rules and procedures.

Public Law
Public law governs the relationship between individuals and the state, focusing on issues
that affect society as a whole. It ensures that government actions are conducted within the
boundaries of the law and protects the rights of citizens from unlawful state interference.
This category of law includes constitutional law, criminal law, and administrative law.
Constitutional law serves as the foundation, outlining the structure of the government, its
powers, and the fundamental rights of individuals. For instance, the Indian Constitution
guarantees rights like equality before the law and freedom of speech, and violations of these
rights can be challenged in court. Criminal law, on the other hand, addresses acts considered
harmful to society, such as theft, assault, or murder. Here, the state takes responsibility for
prosecuting the accused and ensuring justice is served. Administrative law focuses on
regulating the actions of government bodies, ensuring they operate fairly and within their
authority. Together, public law maintains order, protects societal interests, and ensures the
accountability of governmental authorities.

Page 7 of 30
 Private Law
Private law governs the relationships between individuals, organizations, or entities,
focusing on resolving disputes and protecting private rights. Unlike public law, which
involves the state, private law is concerned with personal matters and disputes between
parties. Examples of private law include contract law, property law, tort law, and family
law. Contract law regulates agreements between individuals or entities, ensuring that the
terms of a contract are fulfilled and disputes are addressed if they arise. Property law deals
with ownership, transfer, and use of property, safeguarding individuals’ rights over tangible
and intangible assets. Tort law provides remedies for civil wrongs like negligence,
defamation, or trespass, enabling the injured party to seek compensation. Family law
handles personal matters such as marriage, divorce, child custody, and inheritance, focusing
on maintaining harmony in familial relationships. Private law ensures fairness and justice in
individual interactions and provides mechanisms to resolve conflicts peacefully.

Di erence btwn CIVIL AND COMMON LAW SYSTEM

The civil law system is a legal framework where laws are codified into comprehensive
written statutes or codes. Judges in this system base their decisions on these written laws
rather than past judgments. The civil law system provides detailed guidance on how laws
should be interpreted and applied, leaving limited room for judicial discretion.

The common law system relies on judicial decisions and precedents set by higher courts.
Judges play a more active role in interpreting laws and setting legal principles through their
rulings. This system emphasizes flexibility, allowing laws to evolve over time through case
law rather than being strictly bound by codified statutes.

DIFFERENCES
• In the civil law system, laws are based on written codes that cover all possible legal
scenarios. Judges are bound to follow these statutes strictly and apply them to the facts of
the case.
In the common law system, the primary source of law is judicial precedent, meaning
decisions made by higher courts in earlier cases are binding on lower courts. While statutes
exist, their interpretation and application often depend on prior judgments.

• Judges in the civil law system act as investigators or administrators. Their role is limited
to applying the law as written in the codes. They do not create or interpret laws
expansively and focus solely on the facts presented.
In the common law system, judges have a more dynamic role. They interpret laws and make
decisions that can create new legal principles or modify existing ones. Their rulings can
become binding precedents for future cases.

• Civil law systems do not place much importance on past judicial decisions. Each case is
decided based on the codified statutes, and previous rulings are rarely referred to.

Page 8 of 30
ff
In contrast, the common law system heavily relies on precedents. The principle of stare
decisis ensures that similar cases are decided similarly, providing consistency and
predictability.

• The common law system is more flexible because judges can adapt the law to changing
circumstances by interpreting statutes or creating new precedents. This allows the system
to evolve with societal needs.
The civil law system, being codified, is less flexible. Any changes or updates require
amendments to the codes, which can be a lengthy legislative process.

• Civil law systems are generally more predictable because the laws are explicitly written,
and judges adhere strictly to them. Citizens and lawyers can easily refer to the codes for
guidance.
The common law system can be less predictable because outcomes depend on judicial
interpretation and the specific facts of each case. However, it offers flexibility in adapting to
new situations.

Sources of law
For a complete understanding of the concept of law, it is also necessary to understand the
sources of law. The expression ‘source of law’ means the origin from which rules of human
conduct come into existence and derive legal force or binding character

Page 9 of 30
 LEGAL SOURCE
By reference to their legal sources, there are four kinds of law:
A) Legislation : Enacted law having its source in legislation.
B) Precedent : Case law having its source in previous judgements.
C) Custom : Customary law having its source in custom of the society.
D) Agreement: Conventional law having its source in agreement.

Legislation is an important source of law. “legis” means law and “latum” means making
Legislation put together means: making of law. It is embodied in an authoritative form of
written words and is codified. Among the four sources, legislation is treated as a supreme
source of law. Parliament is the supreme legislative body of the country.

Ratio decidendi refers to the legal principle or rule that a court uses to decide a case. This
rule becomes a binding precedent, which other courts must follow in future cases with
similar facts. In simple words, it is the main point or the legal reasoning that the judge
relies on to reach the verdict. For example, if a court rules that stealing is illegal because it
harms others, the idea that "stealing is harmful" becomes the ratio decidendi of the case.
It refers specifically to the legal reasoning that was essential to reaching the court's decision,
distinguishing it from obiter dicta which means remarks or observations made by a judge
that are not central to the decision and therefore not binding.

In simpler terms, it is the "why" behind the court's ruling, providing a guideline for
resolving similar issues in subsequent cases.

Classi cation of Sources of Law according to Salmond:

According to Salmond, the sources of law can be classified into two broad categories:

1. Primary Sources of Law

These are the actual sources from which law originates. They include:

◦ Legislation (Statute Law)

Legislation refers to laws made by the legislature, which includes acts,
statutes, and other legal provisions enacted by the government. Statutory law
is considered one of the most authoritative and formal sources of law, as it
comes from a recognized legislative body. Examples of legislative laws
include the Indian Penal Code (IPC), Constitution of India, and Criminal
Procedure Code (CrPC). The importance of legislation lies in its clarity and
its ability to be enacted and amended according to the evolving needs of
society.

◦ Judicial Decisions (Case Law or Precedent)

Case law refers to the body of law created by judicial decisions. When courts
interpret laws and apply them to specific cases, their rulings become a source
of law. The decisions of higher courts, such as the Supreme Court of India
and High Courts, form the foundation for legal precedents that lower courts
must follow. Judicial decisions help in interpreting unclear statutory
Page 10 of 30
fi
 provisions and also help in the development of new principles when gaps exist
in existing law. The doctrine of precedent ensures consistency and
predictability in the legal system.

◦ Customary Law
Customary law refers to practices and customs that have been consistently
followed by a community or group over a long period. These customs,
when accepted by society, can become binding legal rules. However, for a
custom to be recognized as a source of law, it must satisfy certain criteria such
as immemorial usage, reasonable practice, and consistency with public
policy and statutory law. For example, traditional practices such as
Jallikattu in Tamil Nadu, though controversial, are rooted in the cultural
customs of the region and have been accepted by law in specific
circumstances.

◦ Conventions
Conventions are unwritten rules that are followed by the institutions of the
state. They are practices that have evolved over time but are not legally
enforceable. However, these practices are significant because they guide the
conduct of public authorities and officials. In India, conventions play a role in
the functioning of parliamentary procedures, like the selection of the Prime
Minister or the President’s discretion in certain situations.

2. Secondary Sources of Law

Secondary sources help in the creation and development of the primary sources of
law but do not themselves create binding legal norms. They include:

◦ Textbooks and Commentaries

Legal textbooks and commentaries written by experts help in understanding
the law. Though these are not directly sources of law, they provide guidance
on interpreting legal principles and statutes. Works such as Salmon's
Jurisprudence help lawyers, judges, and lawmakers to understand how
certain legal principles are to be applied.

◦ Legal Maxims and Principles

Legal maxims are established principles of law, which, although not
codified, guide the courts in legal reasoning. For example, the maxim "Nemo
judex in causa sua" means "no one should be a judge in their own case,"
which ensures fairness in legal proceedings. These maxims play an important
role in judicial interpretation, especially when a law is ambiguous or silent on
a matter.

Page 11 of 30
CUSTOMS
Customs are considered an important source of law in India, especially under Hindu law,
Muslim law, and customary practices of tribal communities. Customs are longstanding
practices followed by a community that are accepted as binding.

The Indian legal frameworks recognize customs primarily under Article 13 of the
Constitution, which states that customs, like any other laws, cannot violate fundamental
rights. Moreover, in uncodified areas of law, such as personal laws or local practices,
customs hold significant authority.

For a custom to be accepted as valid and legally enforceable, it must satisfy the following
essential characteristics:

1. Antiquity (Ancient Usage)

• Definition and Explanation: Antiquity means that the custom must have existed for
an indeterminable time, i.e., it should be ancient enough that its origin cannot be
traced. The rationale behind this requirement is that customs are not formal laws but
derive their legitimacy from consistent observance over generations. The courts
generally consider customs to be valid if they have been in practice for more than 20
years, though the exact time span depends on the nature of the custom and
community involved.
• Examples: Customs related to marriage, inheritance, or religious practices, such as
the concept of karta (head of the family) under Hindu law

2. Reasonableness

• Definition and Explanation: The custom must not be unreasonable, oppressive,

immoral, or contrary to public policy. A reasonable custom is one that aligns with
justice, equity, and good conscience. If the custom causes harm to individuals or
contradicts basic principles of the law, it will be deemed invalid.
◦ A valid custom: A tribal practice requiring the eldest son to perform ancestral
rites.
◦ An invalid custom: Sati, or the practice of widow immolation, was deemed
unreasonable and banned under the Sati Abolition Act, 1829.

3. Continuity and Consistency

• Definition and Explanation: A valid custom must have been observed continuously
without significant interruptions or deviations. A custom that is not followed
consistently or has been abandoned cannot be considered legally binding. This
requirement ensures that customs are not random practices but entrenched traditions
deeply embedded in societal behavior.

Page 12 of 30
4. Certainty

• Definition and Explanation: Certainty implies that the custom must be specific,
clear, and well-defined. A vague or ambiguous custom cannot be enforced as it would
lead to confusion and inconsistent interpretations. Certainty ensures that customs are
easy to identify and apply in legal disputes. A custom must have a clear purpose,
terms, and scope, leaving no room for arbitrary interpretations.
• Definition and Explanation: A custom must not conflict with existing statutory
provisions. If a custom contradicts codified laws, the statutory law prevails.
However, in areas where the law is silent, customs often fill the gap. The interplay
between customs and statutory law is critical in personal laws. For example, the
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, recognizes customary practices related to marriage
ceremonies if they are not in direct conflict with its provisions.

5. Morality and Public Policy

• Definition and Explanation: A custom must not violate moral principles or public
policy. This ensures that customs align with evolving societal norms and do not
perpetuate harm or injustice. Customs that contravene modern ethical standards or
democratic values are not legally enforceable.

PRECEDENT THEORY
The concept of precedent theory is one of the foundational principles in legal systems,
especially in countries following common law traditions like India. It is based on the idea
that past judicial decisions serve as a guide for future cases, ensuring consistency and
fairness in the application of laws. This approach allows courts to rely on established legal
reasoning rather than creating entirely new judgments for every case.

Precedent theory is rooted in the principle of stare decisis, a Latin phrase meaning "to
stand by things decided." This principle emphasizes the importance of following
established rulings to maintain stability and predictability in the law. It prevents courts from
making arbitrary decisions and ensures that similar cases are treated in the same way,
upholding the rule of law. For example, if a higher court has already determined how a
particular law should be interpreted, lower courts are generally required to follow that
interpretation in cases with similar facts.

Key Elements of Precedent Theory

1. Ratio Decidendi: This refers to the legal reasoning or principle underlying a judge's
decision. It is the binding part of a judgment that must be followed in future cases.
For instance, in the landmark Indian case Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
(1973), the ratio decidendi established that the basic structure of the Constitution
cannot be amended. This principle is still applied in Indian constitutional law.

Page 13 of 30
 2. Obiter Dicta: These are statements or observations made by a judge that do not form
the basis of the decision. While they may provide insights or persuasive arguments,
they are not binding. For example, in the same Kesavananda Bharati case, several
judges discussed the scope of fundamental rights, but those discussions outside the
main ruling are considered obiter dicta.

Precedent theory plays a crucial role in maintaining the integrity of the legal system. It
ensures that laws are applied consistently, providing clarity and predictability for individuals
and businesses. However, precedents are not rigid. Courts have the flexibility to modify or
overrule them when necessary.

LEGISLATION
Legislation is the process by which laws are created, amended, or repealed by a
governing authority such as a parliament. It forms the foundation of a country’s legal
system, establishing rules and regulations that guide the functioning of society. By codifying
these rules into written law, legislation ensures clarity, order, and accountability in both
public and private life.

Legislation can be broadly categorized into primary and secondary legislation. Primary
legislation refers to laws directly created by the legislature, such as acts or statutes, which
forms the core legal framework of a country. Secondary legislation, on the other hand,
includes rules and regulations made by subordinate authorities under the powers granted by
primary legislation. This allows for detailed and flexible governance in specific areas
without overburdening the primary legislative body.

The importance of legislation lies in its ability to maintain order, protect individual
rights, and promote justice. By setting clear rules, it prevents conflicts, ensures fairness,
and establishes consequences for violations. Moreover, legislation is a dynamic tool that
adapts to societal changes, addressing modern challenges such as environmental protection,
cybercrime, and digital privacy. Without legislation, societies would struggle to achieve
stability and fairness.

JURISDICTION
Jurisdiction is the legal power or authority given to a court to hear and decide cases.
Without jurisdiction, a court cannot take up a case or give a valid judgment. It ensures that
every case is handled by the appropriate court based on factors like the type of case, the
location of the parties involved, and the value of the claim. Jurisdiction acts as a guiding
principle in the judicial system, making sure that disputes are resolved efficiently and fairly.

For example, if a property dispute arises in Delhi, it cannot be decided by a court in

Mumbai unless specific legal provisions allow it. Similarly, a case involving a murder will
not be taken up by a consumer court because it falls under criminal law.

Page 14 of 30
Jurisdiction is essential because it divides the workload among different courts and ensures
that cases are heard by courts with the right expertise and authority. If a court hears a case
without having jurisdiction, its decision is considered invalid.

Territorial Jurisdiction: This relates to the geographical area within which a court has
authority. For instance, a case arising in Delhi cannot be filed in a court located in Mumbai
unless specific laws allow it. Each court has a defined territory where it can exercise its
power.

Subject-Matter Jurisdiction: This refers to the kind of cases a court can hear. For example,
Family Courts handle matters related to marriage, divorce, and child custody, while Labour
Courts deal with industrial disputes and workers' rights. Subject-matter jurisdiction ensures
that specialized courts or tribunals handle cases they are best equipped to resolve.

Pecuniary Jurisdiction: This is based on the monetary value of the case. Lower courts
typically deal with cases involving smaller amounts of money, while higher courts take on
cases involving larger sums. For instance, a district court might handle a property dispute
worth ₹10 lakh, but a High Court would handle cases with higher stakes.

Appellate Jurisdiction: This applies when a higher court hears appeals against the
decisions of lower courts. For example, if a person is dissatisfied with a district court's
decision, they can appeal to the High Court. Similarly, the Supreme Court hears appeals
from High Courts.

Challenges of the Judicial System in India

The Indian judicial system is one of the oldest and most extensive in the world. It is built on
principles of fairness, equality, and justice. However, the system faces numerous challenges
that hinder its effectiveness and ability to deliver timely justice. These challenges have
significant implications for the rule of law and the trust people place in the judiciary. Below
are the major issues:

1. Delay in Justice Delivery

One of the biggest problems in the Indian legal system is the delay in resolving cases. Lakhs
of cases are pending in courts at all levels, from district courts to the Supreme Court. It
often takes years, and sometimes even decades, for a case to be decided. This happens
because there are not enough judges, too many cases, and frequent adjournments. People
lose faith in the system because justice that takes so long is not useful. Delays cause
frustration and financial stress, and sometimes people give up on seeking justice altogether.

2. Overburdened Judiciary

Page 15 of 30
Courts in India are flooded with cases, and the number of judges is far too low to handle
them all. For a country of over a billion people, India has only about 20 judges per million
citizens. This is much less than what is needed. Judges are overworked, and this affects the
quality of judgments. Courts also lack basic infrastructure like proper seating, libraries, and
staff to assist judges. This makes the problem worse and slows down the system even more.

3. Accessibility and Affordability of Justice

For many people in India, especially those living in villages or from poor backgrounds, the
legal system is not easily accessible. Legal services are often expensive, and the process of
filing and fighting a case is time-consuming. Even though free legal aid is available, most
people do not know about it or how to use it. Hiring a good lawyer is costly, and court
procedures can take years, adding to the expense. Because of these issues, many people do
not approach the courts even when their rights are violated.

4. Complex Legal Procedures

The legal system in India is complicated and difficult to understand for most people. Laws
are written in old, formal language, and the procedures for filing and fighting a case are
technical. Even small mistakes in following these procedures can cause delays or get the
case dismissed. For ordinary citizens, this complexity is a big problem, as they need legal
help even for basic tasks. Simplifying the language of laws and the court process could
make justice easier to access.

STAGES OF CIVIL CASES IN INDIA

Civil cases in India follow a detailed and structured process as outlined in the Code of Civil
Procedure, 1908 (CPC). The aim of these procedures is to ensure fairness and consistency
in resolving disputes between parties.

1. Cause of Action

A civil case begins when a legal right of an individual is violated or threatened, giving rise
to a cause of action. The cause of action is the set of facts or circumstances that entitle the
plaintiff to seek legal remedy. Without a valid cause of action, a court will not entertain a
civil suit. For instance, a breach of contract or non-payment of dues may form a cause of
action.

2. Notice

Page 16 of 30
Before filing a civil suit, the plaintiff is often required to serve a legal notice to the
defendant, especially in cases involving public authorities or specific types of disputes, such
as property matters. The notice informs the defendant of the grievance and gives them an
opportunity to resolve the issue amicably before litigation begins. Under Section 80 of the
CPC, notice is mandatory when suing a government entity.

3. Filing of Plaint

If the issue is not resolved after serving notice, the plaintiff proceeds to file a plaint in the
appropriate civil court. The plaint is a written document that outlines the facts of the case,
the legal basis for the claim, and the relief sought by the plaintiff. Along with the plaint, the
plaintiff submits supporting documents and pays the required court fees. The court inspects
the plaint to ensure that it complies with legal requirements and falls within its jurisdiction.

4. Issuance of Summons

After the plaint is admitted, the court issues a summons to the defendant. A summons is a
formal notice directing the defendant to appear before the court on a specified date and
respond to the claims made by the plaintiff. A copy of the plaint is sent along with the
summons to ensure that the defendant is fully informed of the allegations.

5. Appearance of Parties

On the date specified in the summons, both parties must appear before the court. If the
plaintiff or defendant fails to appear, the court may dismiss the case or proceed ex parte (in
the absence of the non-appearing party). The appearance stage allows the court to confirm
the willingness of both parties to participate in the proceedings.

6. Filing of Written Statement

The defendant files a written statement, which is a detailed reply to the plaintiff's claims. It
includes admissions or denials of the plaintiff's allegations, along with any counterclaims or
defenses. The written statement must be filed within 30 days of receiving the summons,
extendable up to 90 days with the court’s permission. If the defendant does not file a written
statement, the court may accept the plaintiff’s claims as unchallenged.

7. Production of Evidence

Both parties are required to submit any documents or evidence they intend to rely upon
during the trial. This stage ensures that the court has access to all relevant materials, such as
contracts, receipts, or correspondence, which may support the claims or defenses of the
parties.

8. Examination of Parties
Page 17 of 30
At this stage, the court examines both parties to clarify the facts and allegations made in
their respective pleadings. This process is guided by Order X of the CPC, which allows the
court to identify points of agreement and disagreement, thereby narrowing the scope of the
trial.

10. Presenting Witnesses

The trial begins with the parties presenting their witnesses and evidence. The plaintiff
presents their case first, followed by the defendant. Witnesses are examined in chief (by the
party calling them) and cross-examined (by the opposing party). This process helps the
court evaluate the credibility of the witnesses and the strength of the evidence.

11. Arguments

Once the evidence stage is complete, both parties present their final arguments. During this
stage, the lawyers, the evidence and legal points, highlight the strengths of their case, and
address the weaknesses in the opposing party’s arguments. They may also refer to relevant
statutes and judicial precedents to support their contentions.

12. Order

After considering the evidence and arguments, the court delivers its order or judgment. The
judgment provides a detailed explanation of the court’s findings on the issues and the
reasons for its decision. Based on the judgment, the court issues a decree, which specifies
the relief granted to the winning party or the dismissal of the case.

13. Execution of Order

If the defendant does not voluntarily comply with the court’s decree, the winning party can
file for execution under Order XXI of the CPC. Execution ensures that the judgment is
enforced, such as by recovering damages, delivering property, or enforcing an injunction.
The court may use measures like attachment of property or arrest of the judgment-debtor to
implement the decree

STAGES OF CRIMINAL CASES IN INDIA

Criminal cases in India follow a well-defined process governed by the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973 (CrPC). This framework ensures that justice is delivered while
safeguarding the rights of the accused, the victim, and the state.

1. Registration of the First Information Report (FIR)

The process begins when the victim or any other person provides information about a
cognizable offense (one where the police can arrest without a warrant) to the police. The

Page 18 of 30
information is recorded as an FIR under Section 154 of the CrPC. For non-cognizable
offenses, police need prior approval from a magistrate to investigate.

2. Investigation

After registering the FIR, the police initiate an investigation. This involves collecting
evidence, examining the crime scene, questioning witnesses, recording statements, and
conducting searches and seizures. If necessary, the police may arrest suspects during this
stage. The investigation concludes with the preparation of a charge sheet (if sufficient
evidence is found) or a closure report (if no evidence is found).

3. Filing of the Charge Sheet

If the investigation confirms that an offense has been committed, the police file a charge
sheet in the court. The charge sheet contains details of the offense, evidence collected, and
the accused. If no substantial evidence is found, a closure report is filed instead, and the
accused may be discharged.

4. Cognizance by the Magistrate

The magistrate examines the charge sheet or closure report and takes cognizance of the
offense. This means the magistrate formally recognizes that an offense has been committed
and decides whether the case should proceed further or not.

5. Issuance of Process

Once the magistrate takes cognizance, they issue a summons or warrant to the accused
under, requiring them to appear before the court. This marks the beginning of the trial
process.

6. Appearance of the Accused and Bail

The accused appears before the court in response to the summons or warrant. If the accused
has been arrested, they may apply for bail. Bail is granted or denied based on factors like
the seriousness of the offense, risk of absconding, and likelihood of tampering with
evidence.

7. Framing of Charges

The court examines the charges against the accused and determines whether there is
sufficient evidence to proceed with the trial. If the court finds a prima facie case, charges are
formally framed under Section 228 of the CrPC, and the accused is asked to plead guilty or
not guilty. If no case is found, the accused is discharged.

8. Trial

Page 19 of 30
The trial stage is where the court examines evidence, hears witnesses, and ensures a fair
evaluation of the case. The trial includes the following steps:

• Examination-in-Chief: The prosecution presents witnesses and evidence to support

the charges.
• Cross-Examination: The defense cross-examines the witnesses to challenge their
credibility.

9. Final Arguments

After all the evidence is presented, both the prosecution and defense make their final
arguments. They summarize their respective cases, highlight key evidence, and cite legal
precedents to support their contentions.

10. Judgment

Based on the evidence and arguments, the court delivers its judgment. If the accused is
found guilty, they are convicted and sentenced according to the provisions of law. If found
not guilty, they are acquitted.

11. Sentencing

If the accused is convicted, the court determines the appropriate punishment, which may
include imprisonment, fines, or both. In serious offenses, like murder or rape, the court may
impose life imprisonment or the death penalty in extreme cases.

FALLACIES
Fallacies are errors or flaws in reasoning that undermine the logical validity of an
argument. These errors can occur unintentionally or be used deliberately to mislead
others. At first, these arguments might seem logical and convincing, but when you examine
them closely, you’ll find they are flawed.
In simple terms, a fallacy occurs when the link between an argument’s ideas is wrong,
leading to a conclusion that doesn’t actually follow the evidence.

Common Fallacies in Reasoning

1. Ad Hominem - against the person

This fallacy occurs when the focus shifts from the argument to the person making it. Instead of
addressing the issue, the arguer attacks the character, background, or circumstances of the opponent.

Example:
“You can’t trust John’s opinion on environmental policies because he doesn’t recycle.”
In this example, John’s stance on environmental policies is dismissed based on his personal
behavior, which is irrelevant to the validity of his argument.
Page 20 of 30
*Ad Populum Fallacy

This fallacy appeals to the popularity of an idea or belief to claim it is true. It assumes that if many
people agree with something, it must be correct.

Example:
"Everyone believes that this diet works, so it must be the best way to lose weight.”

*Red Herring Fallacy

This fallacy distracts from the main issue by introducing an irrelevant topic. It shifts attention away
from the actual argument.

Example:
In a debate about improving education, someone says, "But what about the rising cost of
healthcare?"

2. Strawman Fallacy

This fallacy involves misrepresenting or oversimplifying an opponent’s argument to make it easier

to attack. The arguer distorts the original argument, refutes the distorted version, and claims victory.

Example:
Person A: “We should have stricter regulations on pollution.”
Person B: “So you’re saying we should shut down all industries? That’s unrealistic!”
Here, Person B exaggerates Person A’s argument, making it easier to refute.

3. Appeal to Authority

This fallacy occurs when someone uses the opinion of an authority figure as evidence, even when
the authority is not an expert on the subject.

Example:
“This diet must work because a famous actor follows it.”
While the actor may be influential, their expertise in nutrition is questionable, making this appeal
invalid.

4. False Dilemma (Either-Or Fallacy)

This fallacy presents only two options or outcomes, ignoring other possibilities. It forces a choice
between two extremes when a middle ground might exist.

Example:
“If you’re not with us, you’re against us.”
This oversimplification ignores the possibility of neutrality or alternative stances.

7. Hasty Generalization

This fallacy occurs when a conclusion is drawn from insufficient or biased evidence, leading to an
overgeneralization.
Page 21 of 30
Example: “All politicians are corrupt because one mayor was caught in a scandal.”
This conclusion is based on limited evidence and unfairly generalizes all politicians.

10. Appeal to Emotion

This fallacy uses emotional appeals to manipulate the audience, ignoring logical reasoning.

Example:
“If you don’t donate to this charity, imagine how many children will go hungry.”
While the issue is serious, the argument relies solely on emotional impact without addressing the
effectiveness of the charity.

11. Non Sequitur Fallacy

It means "does not follow" in Latin. This fallacy occurs when a conclusion doesn't logically follow
from the premise or evidence.

Example:
"If we can send humans to the moon, we should be able to cure all diseases."
Going to the moon and curing diseases are unrelated. The conclusion doesn't logically connect to
the premise.

12. Alphabet soup

This fallacy involves using an excessive amount of acronyms, jargons, or technical terms to confuse
or impress the audience rather than clarify the argument. The aim is to overwhelm others instead of
providing a logical explanation.

Doctrinal Research
Doctrinal legal research is one that is conducted on a legal proposition through the analysis
of the existing provisions of the statutes and cases. This research is theoretical in nature as it
includes detailed legal concepts and principles from various sources like legislation,
precedents, and others to inspect them for reaching a valid conclusion.

The origin of doctrinal research came from the term ‘doctrine’, which means 'principle'. It is
done through a rigorous and systematic study, analysis, and critical evaluation of legal
doctrines, rules, concepts, and their inter-relationship. This research is also known as 'Pure
Theoretical Research’.

In doctrinal legal research, the research is mainly a library-based study where statutes,
judgements, magazines, articles, legal journals, and others could be found. Relevant
information and data on a particular legal problem can be collected, and after going through

Page 22 of 30
them, it would be easier to reach a conclusion by critically analysing them. This research is
done by following traditional legal research methods.

Doctrinal legal research is done by thoroughly reading theoretical study materials that are
present in a library. So it is a book-based examination of different statutes, legal books,
laws, and other legal literature and journals to find an unambiguous solution to a legal
proposition. It is mainly based on secondary sources of information, as it does not require
fieldwork or experiments. It begins with several legal propositions at the beginning, and the
entire inspection is focused on determining the soundness of the underlying hypothesis. Its
objective is to gain knowledge from different legal documents and additional sources and
utilise them for deducing an adequate response to the legal question through logical and
rational reasoning and interpretation.

The sources that are mainly used in doctrinal legal research are conventional legal sources.
The sources not only consist of statutes and enactments but also legal history, judicial
pronouncements, reports of the committee, and so on. The Acts that have been passed by the
Legislature also fall under this category of sources. The decisions and judgements of the
various High Courts and the Supreme Court are also sources of doctrinal legal

Non-Doctrinal Research
Non-doctrinal legal research is based on practical facts. It is fact-oriented research. It has a
much wider aspect than that of doctrinal legal research. Research is mainly done through
fieldwork or first-hand study by a scholar. This research is not based on secondary sources.

It requires the collection of primary data, which is required for that research problem. This
research focuses on the practical aspects that explore the intersection between law and
society. This research is also termed as 'socio-legal research', as it is conducted by
combining social science and legal principles to study the interlink between law and
society.
It involves the empirical method of collecting information and then analysing the legal
practices, institutions, and policies within their social context. It studies the impact of the
law and these institutions and policies on an individual's attitude and its effect on society.

Non-doctrinal research can also be referred to as 'purposive' research when discussing

consequences, as it emphasises the effects of laws on people and society or the purpose of
Page 23 of 30
enacting a specific law. This study is mainly done from a multidisciplinary perspective. It
implements various methods to conduct this research. After employing all the methods that
are necessary for collecting primary legal information, a conclusion is drawn by the
researchers. Some of the methods that have been used for conducting non-doctrinal research
include observations, demonstrations, surveys, questionnaires, and interviews.

This research gained importance when it became necessary to bring legal matters into the
domain of actuality. It was believed that legal research must not only be based on theoretical
studies or on written laws but also concentrate on its practical impact on society in the real
world. Researchers, while selecting a topic, mainly focus on a legal factor, like law, and a
non-legal factor, like social, economic, or political variables, and then examine and analyse
their relationship and interconnection using data, which can either be quantitative or
qualitative. The primary aim of this research is to find the workings of law in the practical
world.

Law as a Social and Behavioral Science

Law is often perceived as a rigid system of rules and regulations, but in reality, it is much
more dynamic and deeply intertwined with human behavior and societal norms. To
truly understand the essence of law, it is essential to view it not just as a legal framework but
as a product of human society and interaction. This perspective allows us to see law as a
social and behavioral science that both reflects and influences how people live, behave, and
coexist.

At its core, law is a mirror of society. It embodies the values, ethics, and cultural traditions
that a community deems important. For instance, laws against theft or assault reflect a
society’s commitment to protecting individual rights and maintaining order. Over time, as
societal values evolve, laws also change to accommodate new norms, such as the increasing
emphasis on human rights and environmental protection. This adaptability highlights the
social nature of law as it evolves alongside human progress.

The behavioral aspect of law focuses on its impact on individuals and communities. Laws
are not just meant to punish wrongdoers but to shape behavior and encourage adherence to
societal norms. For example, anti-smoking laws in public spaces aim to protect public
health while simultaneously fostering awareness about the risks of smoking. Understanding
the psychological and social factors that influence compliance with the law helps
policymakers design rules that are not only enforceable but also effective in achieving their
goals.

Law also serves as a powerful tool for driving societal change. It has historically been used
to challenge discriminatory practices and promote equality. Landmark rulings like the
abolition of slavery or the decriminalization of homosexuality have reshaped societies by

Page 24 of 30
addressing deeply ingrained biases. This transformative power of law underscores its role as
both a product and an agent of social and behavioral science.

Delegated Legislation
When the function of legislation is entrusted to organs other than the legislature, by the
legislature itself, it is known as delegated legislation.

Delegated legislation refers to laws or rules made by an authority other than the legislature,
under the powers given to it by an Act of Parliament. It is also called subordinate or
secondary legislation. The main idea is that the legislature, due to time constraints or the
technical nature of certain matters, delegates some of its law-making powers to other
bodies, such as government ministers, departments, or local authorities, to create detailed
rules and regulations.

This process is often necessary because modern governance involves complex and technical
areas, such as health, transport, or environment, where specific expertise is required. For
example, a Parliament may pass a law like the Environmental Protection Act, which lays out
broad principles for protecting the environment, but it will delegate powers to the Ministry
of Environment to create detailed regulations about waste disposal, air quality standards,
etc.

Example: Advocates Act of 1961 - Bar Council being an administrative body.

Delegated legislation has several forms, such as rules, regulations, orders, bylaws, and
notifications. These are legally binding and have the same force as laws passed by the
legislature. For instance, traffic regulations made by local municipal authorities are a form
of delegated legislation. The key requirement is that such laws must stay within the limits
set by the parent or enabling Act. If they exceed those limits, they can be declared invalid by
courts under the doctrine of ultra vires (beyond powers).

While delegated legislation ensures flexibility and efficiency in governance, it is often

criticized for shifting law-making powers from the elected legislature to unelected officials.
To maintain accountability, various mechanisms like parliamentary oversight, judicial
review, and public consultation are used to control and monitor it. However, excessive
delegation or insufficient scrutiny can lead to misuse of power, undermining democratic
principles.

The only thing that can be done in this regard is to provide practicable and potent safeguards
against it so that there is no misuse or misapplication of the delegated power. In the
landmark case of Raj Narain vs. State of Patna, the concept of delegated legislation was
examined in detail. The court emphasized that while delegation is permissible, it cannot
involve an excessive transfer of legislative powers to the executive. The legislature must lay
down clear guidelines and limits for the delegated authority to follow. The judgment
highlighted that delegated legislation must adhere strictly to the parent Act's objectives and
principles. If the delegated authority exceeds these boundaries, the legislation can be struck
down as ultra vires, meaning it goes beyond the powers granted by the enabling Act.
Page 25 of 30
Reasons for Delegated Legislation
Time-Saving
Legislatures have limited time to address a wide range of issues, and drafting every detail of
a law is time-consuming. Delegated legislation allows lawmakers to focus on major
policies, delegating routine or minor details to authorities better suited to handle them.

Technicality of the Matters

With the progress of the society things have become more complicated and technical.
All the legislators may not know them fully and, hence, they cannot make any useful
discussion on it. Therefore, after framing of the general policy by the Parliament the
government departments or other bodies who know its technicalities are given the power to
lay down the details.

Emergency Situations
During crises like wars, pandemics, or natural disasters, quick decisions are crucial.
Delegated legislation allows the executive to act swiftly and implement necessary measures
without waiting for legislative approval, ensuring timely responses to emergencies.

Flexibility
Delegated legislation provides flexibility to adapt laws to changing circumstances. For
instance, economic policies, safety regulations, or environmental norms can be modified
quickly to reflect new developments, ensuring laws remain effective and relevant.

Local Matters
Local governments or authorities often deal with issues specific to their region, such as
traffic control, zoning, or waste management. Delegated legislation allows them to create
tailored rules that address the unique needs of their communities.

Experimentation
Delegated legislation allows authorities to experiment with policies and test their
effectiveness on a smaller scale. For example, a new traffic rule can be introduced in one
city before being implemented nationwide, enabling authorities to evaluate its success and
make necessary adjustments

Safeguards against the Delegated Legislation

To ensure that delegated legislation is used properly and does not undermine the democratic
process or citizens’ rights, there are several important safeguards in place: parliamentary
control, judicial control, and publicity.

1. Parliamentary Control
Parliamentary control is one of the most important safeguards for ensuring that delegated
legislation is consistent with the original intentions of the parent Act. The legislature,
although delegating authority to other bodies, retains the right to oversee and scrutinize the
Page 26 of 30
delegated rules and regulations. Typically, when a delegated authority makes a regulation, it
is required to lay it before Parliament for a specified period. During this time, Parliament
can review the regulation, ask questions, and debate whether it complies with the
framework and objectives set out by the original legislation. If lawmakers find that the
delegated rules go beyond the powers granted to the authority or are otherwise problematic,
they can amend, approve, or reject the regulations.

2. Judicial Control
Judicial control provides another safeguard by allowing the courts to review delegated
legislation. When a regulation or rule made by a delegated authority is challenged in court,
judges have the power to examine whether the regulation exceeds the powers granted to the
authority by the enabling Act. This is known as the ultra vires doctrine, which means
"beyond the powers." If a regulation is found to go beyond the scope of what was intended
by the parent Act, the court can strike it down as invalid. This ensures that delegated
authorities cannot create rules that overstep the legal boundaries set for them by Parliament.

3. Publicity
Publicity is another safeguard that ensures transparency in the process of delegated
legislation. When regulations or rules are made, they must be published in a manner that
makes them accessible to the public, such as through official government publications,
gazettes, or online platforms. Publicity helps citizens stay informed about the laws and rules
that affect them, allowing individuals, businesses, and organizations to comply with the
regulations. It also provides the public with an opportunity to challenge or raise concerns
about any regulations that they believe are unfair, unjust, or harmful.

The requirement for publicity ensures that delegated legislation does not operate in secret,
and it gives people the ability to understand and participate in the legal process. By being
able to access and review delegated regulations, citizens can advocate for changes or
demand greater accountability from the authorities responsible for making the rules.

Legal reasoning
Legal reasoning as a concept is a process of thinking which helps a researcher to come to
decision relating to law. Law is a tool of social control that attempts to resolve conflicts in
the society, to direct current activity while maintaining continuity with the past, and to
control the future by laying down procedures, approaches and theories. Every decision must
be guided and followed by a logical reasoning which takes into account the past decisions
and statutes, the present position of the parties to the cases, and its own impact on future
activity.

Types of Arguments:
Arguments can be:
(i) Deductive;
Page 27 of 30
(ii) Inductive;
(iii) Inverse deductive;
(iv) Analogy; and
(v) fortiori.

Deductive Method
The deductive method is a process of reasoning that starts with general assumptions or
principles and then derives specific conclusions from them. In the context of law, this
method is used to apply general legal rules or principles to specific facts, helping to reach
logical and valid conclusions. Deduction moves from the general to the particular, or from a
universal premise to an individual case. It is also referred to as an analytical, abstract, or a
priori method because it emphasizes logical reasoning over observation.

Deductive reasoning is a key part of legal argumentation and scientific research. It uses
logical frameworks such as syllogisms, which are structured arguments composed of a
major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion. In legal reasoning, the major premise
represents a general rule of law, the minor premise presents the facts of a specific case, and
the conclusion explains how the rule applies to those facts.

For example, under Indian criminal law, a person can only qualify as a victim of rape if two
conditions are met: (1) there must be sexual intercourse with a woman, and (2) the
intercourse must occur without her consent. If the specific facts of a case show that the
woman had consensual intercourse, the legal reasoning concludes that she cannot be
considered a victim of rape under the law. Here, the major premise is the rule of law, the
minor premise is the statement of fact, and the conclusion logically applies the rule to the
facts.

The conclusion must logically follow from the premises. However, arguments that sound
logical may not always be valid if the premises do not directly support the conclusion. For
instance, if someone argues, "All teachers are human. Some humans are excellent racers.
Therefore, some teachers are excellent racers," the conclusion is not logically valid because
the premises do not establish a direct connection between teachers and racing abilities. Such
arguments are fallacious.

Inductive Method
Inductive reasoning is a method of thinking where we start by looking at specific cases or
facts and then move towards creating a general rule or principle. It works in the opposite
direction of deductive reasoning, which starts with a general rule and applies it to specific
cases. Induction is commonly used in scientific research and law because it helps in
building new ideas and principles from real-life situations.

In law, inductive reasoning involves observing multiple individual cases and identifying
patterns or similarities. From these patterns, we derive general legal principles or
conclusions. For example, if multiple cases show that certain types of actions lead to similar
legal outcomes, these observations might form the basis of a new legal precedent or rule.

Page 28 of 30
An example of inductive reasoning can be seen in daily life. Imagine observing that every
human being you know has eventually passed away. Based on these repeated observations,
you conclude that all humans are mortal. Similarly, in law, courts and legal researchers look
at various cases to make generalizations that can guide future decisions.

Inductive reasoning is empirical because it relies on data and observations from real-life
cases. These observations can be historical or statistical.

One important feature of inductive reasoning is the “inductive leap.” This is the process of
moving from specific observations to a general conclusion. However, this leap is not always
certain. For example, if a researcher studies a sample of individuals and observes specific
traits, they may generalize these findings to the entire population. While the conclusion
might be probable, it is not guaranteed to be true. This is because the sample might not
represent the entire population accurately.

In the legal system, inductive reasoning plays a key role in the development of legal
principles. For instance, if courts observe that similar cases are consistently decided in the
same way, they might use this pattern to establish a broader legal rule. This process ensures
that the law adapts over time by relying on real-life cases and experiences.

Hierarchy of Courts
Supreme Court (Article 141)

The Supreme Court of India, under Article 141 of the Indian Constitution, is the highest
judicial authority in the country. Article 141 states that the law declared by the Supreme
Court shall be binding on all courts within the territory of India. This means that any
decision made by the Supreme Court in a case sets a precedent that must be followed by all
other courts in India. The Supreme Court has the authority to interpret the Constitution and
to make final rulings on constitutional matters, making its decisions critical for the legal
system of the country. This provision ensures uniformity in the application of law across all
courts, maintaining consistency and certainty in judicial decisions.

In addition to its appellate jurisdiction, the Supreme Court can also review its own
judgments and issue orders for the enforcement of rights. This makes it the ultimate
authority in legal matters in India, as its interpretations and rulings are binding on lower
courts and tribunals.

High Courts (Articles 226 and 227)

The High Courts are the highest judicial bodies in each state, with jurisdiction over civil,
criminal, and constitutional matters. Under Article 226, the High Courts have the power to
issue writs for the enforcement of fundamental rights and for any other purpose. This means
the High Court can issue directions to any government body, authority, or person,
compelling them to act in a manner that upholds the law and justice.

Page 29 of 30
Additionally, Article 227 grants the High Courts the authority to supervise and control the
functioning of all subordinate courts (Magistrate Courts and District Courts) within their
jurisdiction.

Tribunals (Articles 323A and 323B)

In India, specialized tribunals are set up to deal with specific types of disputes, such as labor
issues, tax matters, and election disputes. These tribunals derive their powers from Articles
323A and 323B of the Indian Constitution.

Magistrate Courts and District Courts

At the district level, the Magistrate Courts and District Courts play a crucial role in the
Indian legal system. Magistrate Courts are responsible for handling criminal cases that
involve minor offenses, such as petty theft, assault, or traffic violations. They are typically
the first point of contact for individuals involved in criminal matters. Magistrates in these
courts may also conduct preliminary inquiries and issue warrants before the case is sent to a
higher court.

On the other hand, District Courts serve as the main courts for more serious criminal and
civil cases. They have the authority to handle a wider range of cases, including murder,
large-scale fraud, and disputes over property or contracts. District Courts also function as
appellate courts for cases coming from subordinate courts, and they play an important role
in maintaining the efficiency of the legal system at the district level.

Page 30 of 30