Scribd
Upload
2 views

Lab Report Template (2)

The document outlines a structured format for conducting and assessing a scientific experiment, including sections for objectives, materials, procedures, observations, analysis, and conclusions. It includes psychomotor, affective, and cognitive assessment criteria to evaluate performance in various aspects of the experiment. The assessment levels range from unsatisfactory to excellent, providing a comprehensive framework for evaluating student engagement and understanding.

Uploaded by

70136920
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
2 views

Lab Report Template (2)

The document outlines a structured format for conducting and assessing a scientific experiment, including sections for objectives, materials, procedures, observations, analysis, and conclusions. It includes psychomotor, affective, and cognitive assessment criteria to evaluate performance in various aspects of the experiment. The assessment levels range from unsatisfactory to excellent, providing a comprehensive framework for evaluating student engagement and understanding.

Uploaded by

70136920
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Name: SAP ID: Date:

Experiment No.
Objective:

Apparatus and Material:

Abstract:

Theoretical Background

Page 1 of 5
Experimental Procedure

Observations & Calculations:

Tabulated Data:

Page 2 of 5
Analysis:

Conclusion:

Page 3 of 5
Psychomotor Assessment

Assessment Levels
Performance
Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent Score
Indicators
(0) (1) (2) (3)
Able to set the Able to set the
Unable to set the Able to set the apparatus
apparatus with minor apparatus
apparatus. with somemistakes prior
Apparatus mistakesprior to accurately prior
to performing experiment
Setting-R1 experimental to experimental
performance performance
Able to
Unable to operate Able to run experimental Able to run apparatus operate
apparatus accordingto setup with some errors that accordingto experimental apparatus
Apparatus
experimental affect the value of requirement with exactly
handling-R2
requirement. required parameters negligible errors according to
experimental
requirement
Unable to identify/ Student correctly
Able to measure Able to measure the
measure relevant measured the
Data Capturing- parameters but someof relevant parameterswith
parameters. relevant
R3 measurements arewrong some minor errors
parameters

Affective Assessment

Assessment Levels
Performance
Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Score
Indicators
(0) (1) (2)
Does not show any interest ingroup Fully participate in group
Exhibit Responsibility tasks and shows poor collaboration tasks and tries to engage
Absent
and Collaboration -R4 with other team members others for a complete
collaborative work
Performs with almost no energy or
Performs with good energy and
Attitude During focus. Shows lack ofcommitment by focus.
Absent
Experimentation -R5 engaging Commits himself to the lab and
himself in other activities. experiment being performed.

Page 4 of 5
Cognitive Assessment

Performance Assessment Levels


Indicators Exceptional (4) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Poor (1) Score
Hypothesized relationship
Hypothesized relationship Hypothesized relationship
between the variables and
between the variables and the between the variables and
Experimental the predicted results is No hypothesis
predicted results is clear and the predicted results has
Hypothesis reasonable based on what has reasonable based on
been stated, but appears to
has been stated.
general knowledge and
been studied. be based on flawed logic.
observations.
Procedures are listed in a Procedures do
Procedures are listed in clear Procedures are listed but
logical order, but steps are not accurately list
Procedures steps. Each step is numbered not numbered and/or are are not in a logical order or the steps of the
and is a complete sentence. are difficult to follow.
not in complete sentences. experiment.

Professional looking and


Accurate representation of
accurate representation of the
the data in tables and/or Accurate representation of
data in tables and/or graphs. Data are not
graphs. Graphs and tables the data in written form,
Data Graphs and tables are labeled
are labeled and titled. but no graphs or tables are
shown OR are
and titled. Drawings are inaccurate.
Drawings are included presented.
included as necessary and are
when necessary.
well labeled.

The relationship between the


variables is discussed and
The relationship between
trends/patterns logically The relationship between The relationship
the variables is discussed
analyzed. Predictions are made the variables is discussed between the
Analysis about what might happen if and trends/patterns
but no patterns, trends or
variables is not
predictions are made based
part of the lab were changed or logically analyzed. discussed.
on the data.
how the experimental design
could be changed.

Conclusion includes whether Conclusion includes No conclusion


the findings supported the whether the findings Conclusion includes was included in
Conclusion hypothesis, possible sources supported the hypothesis what was learned from the the report OR
of error, and what was learned and what was learned experiment. shows little effort
from the experiment. from the experiment. and reflection.

Page 5 of 5

You might also like