Intelligent Systems Design and Applications 16th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications ISDA 2016 held in Porto Systems and Computing 557 Band 557 Ana Maria Madureira (Editor) - Download the ebook today and own the complete version
Intelligent Systems Design and Applications 16th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications ISDA 2016 held in Porto Systems and Computing 557 Band 557 Ana Maria Madureira (Editor) - Download the ebook today and own the complete version
com
OR CLICK HERE
DOWLOAD EBOOK
https://textbookfull.com/product/intelligent-systems-design-and-
applications-ajith-abraham/
textbookfull.com
Intelligent
Systems Design
and Applications
16th International Conference on
Intelligent Systems Design and
Applications (ISDA 2016) held in Porto,
Portugal, December 16–18, 2016
Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
Volume 557
Series editor
Janusz Kacprzyk, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
e-mail: [email protected]
About this Series
The series “Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing” contains publications on theory,
applications, and design methods of Intelligent Systems and Intelligent Computing. Virtually
all disciplines such as engineering, natural sciences, computer and information science, ICT,
economics, business, e-commerce, environment, healthcare, life science are covered. The list
of topics spans all the areas of modern intelligent systems and computing.
The publications within “Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing” are primarily
textbooks and proceedings of important conferences, symposia and congresses. They cover
significant recent developments in the field, both of a foundational and applicable character.
An important characteristic feature of the series is the short publication time and world-wide
distribution. This permits a rapid and broad dissemination of research results.
Advisory Board
Chairman
Nikhil R. Pal, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, India
e-mail: [email protected]
Members
Rafael Bello Perez, Universidad Central “Marta Abreu” de Las Villas, Santa Clara, Cuba
e-mail: [email protected]
Emilio S. Corchado, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
e-mail: [email protected]
Hani Hagras, University of Essex, Colchester, UK
e-mail: [email protected]
László T. Kóczy, Széchenyi István University, Győr, Hungary
e-mail: [email protected]
Vladik Kreinovich, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, USA
e-mail: [email protected]
Chin-Teng Lin, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
e-mail: [email protected]
Jie Lu, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia
e-mail: [email protected]
Patricia Melin, Tijuana Institute of Technology, Tijuana, Mexico
e-mail: [email protected]
Nadia Nedjah, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
e-mail: [email protected]
Ngoc Thanh Nguyen, Wroclaw University of Technology, Wroclaw, Poland
e-mail: [email protected]
Jun Wang, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
e-mail: [email protected]
Editors
Intelligent Systems
Design and Applications
16th International Conference on Intelligent
Systems Design and Applications
(ISDA 2016) held in Porto, Portugal,
December 16–18, 2016
123
Editors
Ana Maria Madureira Dorabela Gamboa
Departamento de Engenharia Informática Polytechnic Institute of Porto
Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Port Felgueiras
Porto Portugal
Portugal
Paulo Novais
Ajith Abraham Campus of Gualtar
Scientific Network for Innovation University of Minho
and Research Excellence Braga
Machine Intelligence Research Labs Portugal
Auburn, WA
USA
v
vi Preface
General Chairs
Program Chairs
vii
viii ISDA 2016 – Organization
Publication Chair
Web Master
xiii
xiv Contents
1
Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, România
[email protected]
2
University of Craiova, Craiova, România
Abstract. In this paper, we propose a novel database design structure that can
deal with all the aspects of the complexity of data that has to be managed, using
the concepts of defining objects in object oriented programming (OOP). As well,
we create a set of procedures in database system that allows us to manage all type
of data, without knowing the structure of the database. The creation of the data‐
base structure, also the mechanism of inserting and retrieval the information is
made by using a metadata set of information.
The major benefit of the proposed approach is that we can use a relational
database management system (RDBMS), that can assure ACID (atomicity,
consistency, isolation and durability) principles, low cost management and quick
development based on metadata structure. The main advantages of our approach
comparing with NoSQL database system is that we preserve ACID properties of
the information and comparing with NewSQL is that the cost of the projection of
database structure and management of the system is much lower.
Our proposed system is functional and can manage very large amount of data
from heterogenic sources that can be managed by companies without a lot of
know-how.
1 Introduction
How to manage big quantities of dataset with a high rate of changes from heterogeneous
sources and preserve in the same time ACID (atomicity, consistency, isolation and
durability) principles of database systems is a question that each of us has to deal with.
Most of the applications used by companies to manage their data use relational data‐
base management systems (RDMSs) and this fact will remain for the next years, even
though database management systems (DMSs) are evolving very fast. On the other hand,
data structure, are changing often and the number of data sources needed to be used by
companies to remain competitive are rising every day. This is the reason why we create
this new approach in order to retrieve and manage information datasets.
The aim of this paper is to describe an innovative approach that combines informa‐
tional standards from librarianship field with object oriented programming techniques
in order to manage financial and contact information of possible partners or clients.
MARC (Machine Readable Cataloging) is currently the most widely used standard for
storing and exchanging bibliographic records. Evolution of MARC standard has a
history of more than forty years. MARC, is basically a concept for structuring and inter‐
changing of information which evolved separately from concepts of management
systems databases. Even if it is a standard with a high degree of use in libraries, it does
not solve all problems arising from the rapid evolution of data structures and quantity
of existing information.
The structure of the information in MARC format is a linear one, each type of infor‐
mation stored is defined by a set of metadata composed from a set of three numerical
characters that defined field, an element represented by a character alphanumeric that
represents subfield and field label to define the meaning of this field subfield tuple [16].
The information can be stored in field or in a subfield. Basically, if you want to specify
the author of a work, the information that will identify metadata is filed 100, and the
corresponding value will be written to the right of this metadata, in subfield a, as you
can see in Fig. 1.
If there is repetitive information for a given metadata field, we will add a new meta‐
data representing information and the corresponding value. If a subfield is repetitive, $
separator will be used followed by subfield name to write repetitive set of values. The
maximum number of characters that can be stored in a field or subfield, of MARC
standard, is 999 characters.
MARC standard has proved that are some inconvenient in information management:
– The number of fields and subfields are insufficient to encapsulate all type of infor‐
mation needed to be represented;
– Fields and subfields containing a large amount of information are not possible to be
managed;
– Special characters can generate errors in automated process.
Based on this fact regarding MARC standards, MARCXML standard was developed.
This standard representation of information eliminates previously existing limitations
in storing large amounts of information in a single subfield or storing special chars.
This linear way of defining information within a bibliographic record cannot solve
all situations generated by evolution of information needed to be stored, ensuring
sustainability of the concerned information with minimal redundancy, but allows a
semantic presentation of the information stored on this structure [3]. In this sense, to
solve the aforementioned issues, IFLA - International Federation of Library Associa‐
tions and other institutions have proposed and developed FRBR - Functional Require‐
ments for Bibliographic Records, which adopts a description of hierarchical information
in order to increase the level of granularity and to allow better information reuse.
Next we will define a complex informational structure using relational database manage‐
ment systems [18] that is easy to be managed and we will show how to combine the
expertise gained by the team members in librarian bibliographic standards [1], relational
database management systems and object-oriented programming [17].
Object-oriented programming (OOP) refers to a type of computer programming
(software design) in which programmers define not only the data type of a data structure,
but also the types of operations (functions) that can be applied to the data structure.
In this way, the data structure becomes an object that includes both data and func‐
tions. In addition, programmers can create relationships between one object and another.
For example, objects can inherit characteristics from other objects [15].
OOP concepts allow the development of simple and effective solutions to many
problems, enabling software programming complexity decreased, but improving the
quality of the solutions obtained [14].
MARC standard with the list of fields and subfields can be associated with linear
programming where we can manage, perhaps hundreds of variables and procedures, but
increasing their number can generate unmanageable situations. Obviously, the continued
growth of the types of records required to be described will generate situations hard to
be manage in a linear structure.
Managing complex informational structures without the risk of losing information
and in the same time providing tools for easy information retrieval, it is not an easy task,
and this is the reason why we define a normalized information structure, using MARC
definitions and concept of structuring objects specific to object oriented programming,
that allow us to have an easy information management.
The MARC structure, which according to Fig. 1, is defined as linear way of defining
information was mapped into a structure on three levels as we will describe in what it
follows.
6 C. Sabo et al.
The first level defines the uniqueness of registration, and a set of adjacent properties.
This level is equivalent in object-oriented programming with class variables defined at
class level, each record in the database consist in an instance of this class.
The second level consists in the definitions MARC fields, their names having a fixed
length of three characters and values between 001 and 999. Each field has clear defined
meaning, and the meaning of the fields is grouped for easy identification. This level is
equivalent with methods from object oriented programming.
The third level is defined by subfields, that have a fixed length that consists in one
character that has values between a–z and 0–9. Most of the information is stored at
subfield level. There are only a few fields that store information, the remaining fields
representing the relationship between subfield and record level. This concept allows an
easy way to define 1:n and n:m relations. These subfields represent in object oriented
programming the variables defined inside methods.
The principle of defining the database structure for the example above is shown in
Fig. 3. Since the number of tables and relations between tables is too big to be exhaustive
represented here, we represent those elements that are representative for the principles
shown before.
This concept has as starting point librarianship and information science, and concepts
specific to object-oriented programming, which were used to define a metadata structure,
which automatically generate data structures necessary through stored procedures. The
result is that any user can manage all this data structure and information stored in without
knowledge of database management or knowledge about standard query language, the
entire process of defining and extending the database structure is based on the metadata
definition.
An Innovative Approach to Manage Heterogeneous Information 7
Basically, we defined a set of tables in the database that store all metadata we need
to generate: structures of tables, fields, data types, restrictions and relations between
them. Based on triggers, when changes are made on these tables the appropriate oper‐
ation for adding, modifying or deleting tables and relations between them are generated.
Similarly, when we interrogate the database we shall use a single stored procedure
with the list of required parameters to be entered, such as the list of fields needed, the
list of conditions to be fulfilled and other optional parameters.
It does not matter if you want to take information about a person, a task list, employ‐
ment or any other information, you can always call the same procedure, without needing
to know the database structure.
This model is implemented using MySQL database system, a system that allows
storing sufficient quantities of information at the level of TB or PB, with the possibility
of clustering. The concepts defined in this material may be used for other database
systems. The reason for choosing this database system is the ability to achieve rapid
transition from SQL to NoSQL [13] using schemas. For further studies we intend to
compare our results with other NoSQL database systems and also, to map our structure
to some web ontology language (OWL) [6].
4 Preliminary Results
The metadata information defines 41 fields and a total of 89 subfields. The next figure
shows on the left side the list of fields defined in this metadata structure and the type of
information that can be stored at field level, with length limitation if it is needed and on
the right side, the list of subfields defined for the filed selected (Fig. 4).
Metadata set allow to define if a field or a subfield is active or not, based on this
information, stored procedures will allow or not to insert information in field or subfield.
We also define if a subfield is repetitive or not, how many times it can be repeated,
maximum length of information stored in it, if the value stored in a field subfield tuple
is entered by user, or is generated based on some automatic procedures specific to each
data structure.
This metadata structure defines if a field or subfield value should be validated by a
regular expression and if this validation does not pass what will be the results returned
to user. Validation rule can send to user an info note that this information does not respect
the rules defined, a warning, or can generate an error message and reject the insert or
update operation.
Each field or subfield can have different data source information. For example,
subfield CAEN code (activities classification) has as source a dictionary of values, based
on fact that CAEN code is a predefined list. The owner of the company represents an
authority information, which means that behind that name is a complex structure that
respects the same principals. The owner company name is an authority structure because
we can add another information about the owner, like contact information. The
complexity of this information can be extended based on new data source information
that we find. Link data source represents a connection to another data set from the same
structure. For example, if a company is connected to another, we can represent this by
using the link data source.
After the insertion process in database based on metadata that define the entire struc‐
ture the result is 1.738.053 companies from Romania with contact information and main
financial indicators from the last eight years.
To obtain the list of companies that exists in database we use the next stored procedure:
marc_select_advanced_fast('b2b', 'rou', '', '', '', '', '', '', '', '', '', '', '', '', '', '', '', '', '', '', '', '',
'', '', '', '', '', '', '', '', '', '', '', '200a,010a*,210j,210l,220b,220a,212a*,217a*', '', '27',
'539973', '', '', '');
Another Random Document on
Scribd Without Any Related Topics
“spotted” condition; and that this condition is amenable to and
requires purification by suffering,—water, or more frequently fire,
which wash or burn out these stains of sin. So Plutarch (who died
about 120 a.d.) still declares that the souls in Hades have stains of
different colours according to the different passions; and the object
of the purificatory punishment is “that, these stains having been
worn away, the soul may become altogether resplendent.” And Virgil,
when he declares “the guilt which infects the soul is washed out or
burnt out … until a long time-span has effaced the clotted stain, and
leaves the heavenly conscience pure”: is utilizing an Orphic-
Pythagorean Hades-book.[261]
This conception of positive stains is carefully taken over by the
Alexandrian Fathers: Clement speaks of “removing, by continuous
prayer, the stains (κηλίδας) contracted through former sins,” and
declares that “the Gnostic,” the perfect Christian, “fears not death,
having purified himself from all the spots (σπίλους) on his soul.” And
Origen describes “the pure soul that is not weighed down by leaden
weights of wickedness,” where the spots have turned to leaden
pellets such as were fastened to fishing-nets. Hence, says Clement,
“post-baptismal sins have to be purified out” of the soul; and, says
Origen, “these rivers of fire are declared to be of God, who causes
the evil that is mixed up with the whole soul to disappear from out
of it.”[262]
In Pseudo-Dionysius the non-Orphic, purely negative, view
prevails: “Evil is neither in demons nor in us as an existent evil, but
as a failure and dearth in the perfection of our own proper goods.”
And St. Thomas similarly declares that “different souls have
correspondingly different stains, like shadows differ in accordance
with the difference of the bodies which interpose themselves
between the light.”[263]
But Catherine, in this inconsistent with her own general Privation-
doctrine, again conceives the stain, the “macchia del peccato,” as
Cardinal Manning has acutely observed, not simply as a deprivation
of the light of glory, but “as the cause, not the effect, of God’s not
shining into the soul”: it includes in it the idea of an imperfection,
weakness with regard to virtue, bad (secondary) dispositions, and
unheavenly tastes.[264]
3. The true and the false in the Orphic conception.
Now precisely in this profoundly true conception of Positive Stain
there lurk certain dangers, which all proceed from the original Orphic
diagnosis concerning the source of these stains, and these dangers
will have to be carefully guarded against.
(1) The conviction as to the purificatory power of fire was no
doubt, originally, the direct consequence from the Orphic belief as to
the intrinsically staining and imprisoning effect of the body upon the
soul. “The soul, as the Orphics say, is enclosed in the body, in
punishment for the punishable acts”; “liberations” from the body,
and “purifications” of the living and the dead, ever, with them,
proceed together. And hence to burn the dead body was considered
to purify the soul that had been stained by that prison-house: the
slain Clytemnestra, says Euripides, “is purified, as to her body, by
fire,” for, as the Scholiast explains, “fire purifies all things, and burnt
bodies are considered holy.”[265] And such an intensely anti-body
attitude we find, not only fully developed later on into a deliberate
anti-Incarnational doctrine, among the Gnostics, but, as we have
already seen, slighter traces of this same tone may be found in the
(doubtless Alexandrian) Book of Wisdom, and in one, not formally
doctrinal passage, a momentary echo of it, in St. Paul himself. And
Catherine’s attitude is generally, and often strongly, in this direction.
(2) A careful distinction is evidently necessary here. The doctrine
that sin defiles,—affects the quality of the soul’s moral and spiritual
dispositions, and that this defilement and perversion, ever
occasioned by the search after facile pleasure or the flight from
fruitful pain, can normally be removed and corrected only by a long
discipline of fully accepted, gradually restorative pain, either here, or
hereafter, or both: are profound anticipations, and have been most
rightly made integral parts, of the Christian life and conception. The
doctrine that the body is essentially a mere accident or superaddition
or necessary defilement to the soul, is profoundly untrue, in its
exaggeration and one-sidedness: for if the body is the occasion of
the least spiritual of our sins, it can and should become the chief
servant of the spirit; the slow and difficult training of this servant is
one of the most important means of development for the soul itself;
and many faults and vices are not occasioned by the body at all,
whilst none are directly and necessarily caused by it. Without the
body, we should not have impurity, but neither should we have
specifically human purity of soul; and without it, given the
persistence and activity of the soul, there could be as great, perhaps
greater, pride and solipsism, the most anti-Christian of all the vices.
Hence if, in Our Lord’s teaching, we find no trace of a Gnostic desire
for purification from all things bodily as essentially soul-staining, we
do find a profound insistence upon purity of heart, and upon the
soul’s real, active “turning,” conversion, (an interior change from an
un- or anti-moral attitude to an ethical and spiritual dependence
upon God), as a sine qua non condition for entrance into the
Kingdom of Heaven. And the Joannine teachings re-affirm this great
truth for us as a Metabasis, a moving from Death over to Life.
4. Catherine’s conceptions as to the character of the stains and of
their purgation.
And this idea, as to an intrinsic purgation through suffering of
impurities contracted by the soul, can be kept thoroughly Christian,
if we ever insist, with Catherine in her most emphatic and deepest
teachings, that Purgation can and should be effected in this life,
hence in the body,—in and through all the right uses of the body, as
well as in and through all the legitimate and will-strengthening
abstentions from such uses; that the subject-matter of such
purgation are the habits and inclinations contrary to our best
spiritual lights, and which we have largely ourselves built up by our
variously perverse or slothful acts, but which in no case are directly
caused by the body, and in many cases are not even occasioned by
it; and, finally, that holiness consists primarily, not in the absence of
faults, but in the presence of spiritual force, in Love creative, Love
triumphant,—the soul becoming flame rather than snow, and
dwelling upon what to do, give and be, rather than upon what to
shun.—Catherine’s predominant, ultimate tone possesses this
profound positiveness, and corrects all but entirely whatever, if taken
alone, would appear to render the soul’s substantial purity
impossible in this life; to constitute the body a direct and necessary
cause of impurity to the soul; and to find the ideal of perfection in
the negative condition of being free from stain. In her greatest
sayings, and in her actual life, Purity is found to be Love, and this
Love is exercised, not only in the inward, home-coming, recollective
movement,—in the purifying of the soul’s dispositions, but also in the
outgoing, world-visiting, dispersive movement,—in action towards
fellow-souls.
5. Judaeo-Roman conception of Purgatory.
And this social side and movement brings us to the second
element and current in the complete doctrine of a Middle State,—a
constituent which possesses affinities and advantages, and produces
excesses and abuses, directly contrary to those proper to the
element of an intrinsic purgation.
(1) Here we get early Christian utilizations, for purposes of a
doctrine concerning the Intermediate State, of sayings and images
which dwell directly only upon certain extrinsic consequences of evil-
doing, or which, again, describe a future historical and social event,
—the Last Day. For already Origen interprets, in his beautiful Treatise
on Prayer, XXIX, 16, Our Lord’s words as to the debtor: “Thou shalt
be cast into prison, thou shalt not come forth from thence, until thou
hast paid the uttermost farthing,” Matt, v, 25, 26, as applying to
Purgatory. And in his Contra Celsum, VII, 13, he already takes, as
the Biblical locus classicus for a Purgatory, St. Paul’s words as to how
men build, upon the one foundation Christ, either gold, silver, gems,
or wood, hay, stubble; and how fire will test each man’s work; and,
if the work remain, he shall receive a reward, but if it be burnt, he
shall suffer loss and yet he himself shall be saved yet so as by fire, 1
Cor. iii, 10-15. It appears certain, however, that St. Paul is, in this
passage, thinking directly of the Last Day, the End of the World, with
its accompaniment of physical fire, and as to how far the various
human beings, then on earth, will be able to endure the dread stress
and testing of that crisis; and he holds that some will be fit to bear it
and some will not.
Such a destruction of the world by fire appears elsewhere in
Palestinian Jewish literature,—in the Book of Enoch and the
Testament of Levi; and in the New Testament, in 2 Peter iii, 12: “The
heavens being on fire shall be dissolved, the elements shall melt
with fervent heat.” Josephus, Antiquities, XI, ii, 3, teaches a
destruction by fire and another by water. And the Stoics, to whom
also Clement and Origen appeal, had gradually modified their first
doctrine of a simply cosmological Ekpyrōsis, a renovation of the
physical universe by fire, into a moral purification of the earth,
occasioned by, and applied to, the sinfulness of man. Thus Seneca
has the double, water-and-fire, instrument: “At that time the tide” of
the sea “will be borne along free from all measure, for the same
reason which will cause the future conflagration. Both occur when it
seems fit to God to initiate a better order of things and to have done
with the old.… The judgment of mankind being concluded, the
primitive order of things will be recalled, and to the earth will be re-
given man innocent of crimes.”[266]
(2) It is interesting to note how—largely under the influence of the
forensic temper and growth of the Canonical Penitential system, and
of its successive relaxations in the form of substituted lighter good
works, Indulgences,—the Latin half of Christendom, ever more social
and immediately practical than the Greek portion, came, in general,
more and more to dwell upon two ideas suggested to their minds by
those two, Gospel and Pauline, passages. The one idea was that
souls which, whilst fundamentally well-disposed, are not fit for
Heaven at the body’s death, can receive instant purification by the
momentary fire of the Particular Judgment; and the other held that,
thus already entirely purified and interiorly fit for Heaven, they are
but detained (in what we ought, properly, to term a Satisfactorium),
to suffer the now completely non-ameliorative, simply vindictive,
infliction of punishment,—a punishment still, in strict justice, due to
them for past sins, of which the guilt and the deteriorating effects
upon their own souls have been fully remitted and cured.
In this way it was felt that the complete unchangeableness of the
condition of every kind of soul after death, or at least after the
Particular Judgment (a Judgment held practically to synchronize with
death), was assured. And indeed how could there be any interior
growth in Purgatory, seeing that there is no meriting there? Again it
was thought that thus the vision of God at the moment of Judgment
was given an operative value for the spiritual amelioration of souls
which, already in substantially good dispositions, could hardly be
held to pass through so profound an experience without intrinsic
improvement, as the other view seemed to hold.—And, above all,
this form of the doctrine was found greatly to favour the
multiplication among the people of prayers, Masses and good-works
for the dead; since the modus operandi of such acts seemed thus to
become entirely clear, simple, immediate, and, as it were,
measurable and mechanical. For these souls in their “Satisfactorium,”
being, from its very beginning, already completely purged and fit for
Heaven,—God is, as it were, free to relax at any instant, in favour of
sufficiently fervent or numerous intercessions, the exigencies of his
entirely extrinsic justice.
(3) The position of a purely extrinsic punishment is emphasized,
with even unusual vehemence, in the theological glosses inserted, in
about 1512 to 1529, in Catherine’s Dicchiarazione. Yet it is probably
the very influential Jesuit theologian Francesco Suarez, who died in
1617, who has done most towards formulating and theologically
popularizing this view. All the guilt of sin, he teaches, is remitted (in
these Middle souls) at the first moment of the soul’s separation from
the body, by means of a single act of contrition, whereby the will is
wholly converted to God, and turned away from every venial sin.
“And in this way sin may be remitted, as to its guilt, in Purgatory,
because the soul’s purification dates from this moment”;—in
strictness, from before the first moment of what should be here
termed the “Satisfactorium.” As to bad habits and vicious
inclinations, “we ought not to imagine that the soul is detained for
these”: but “they are either taken away at the moment of death, or
expelled by an infusion of the contrary virtues when the soul enters
into glory.”[267] This highly artificial, inorganic view is adopted,
amongst other of our contemporary theologians, by Atzberger, the
continuator of Scheeben.[268]
6. The Judaeo-Roman conception must be taken in synthesis with
the Alexandrine.
Now it is plain that the long-enduring Penitential system of the
Latin Church, and the doctrine and practice of Indulgences stand for
certain important truths liable to being insufficiently emphasized by
the Greek teachings concerning an intrinsically ameliorative
Purgatorium, and that there can be no question of simply eliminating
these truths. But neither are they capable of simple co-ordination
with, still less of super-ordination to, those most profound and
spiritually central immanental positions. As between the primarily
forensic and governmental, and the directly ethical and spiritual, it
will be the former that will have to be conceived and practised as,
somehow, an expression and amplification of, and a practical
corrective and means to, the latter.[269]
(1) The ordinary, indeed the strictly obligatory, Church teaching
clearly marks the suggested relation as the right one, at three,
simply cardinal points. We are bound, by the Confession of Faith of
Michael Palaeologus, 1267 a.d., and by the Decree of the Council of
Florence, 1429 a.d., to hold that these Middle souls “are purged after
death by purgatorial or cathartic pains”; and by that of Trent “that
there is a Purgatory.”[270] Yet we have here a true lucus a non
lucendo, if this place or state does not involve purgation: for no
theologian dares explicitly to transfer and restrict the name
“Purgatory” to the instant of the soul’s Particular Judgment; even
Suarez, as we have seen, has to extend the name somehow.
Next we are bound, by the same three great Decrees, to hold
indeed that “the Masses, Prayers, Alms, and other pious offices of
the Faithful Living are profitable towards the relief of these pains,”
yet this by mode of “suffrage,” since, as the severely orthodox
Jesuit, Father H. Hurter, explains in his standard Theologiae
Dogmaticae Compendium, “the fruit of this impetration and
satisfaction is not infallible, for it depends upon the merciful
acceptance of God.”[271] Hence in no case can we, short of
superstition, conceive such good works as operating automatically:
so that the a priori simplest view concerning the mode of operation
of these prayers is declared to be mistaken. We can and ought,
then, to choose among the conceptions, not in proportion to their
mechanical simplicity, but according to their spiritual richness and to
their analogy with our deepest this-life experiences.
And we are all bound, by the Decree of Trent and the
Condemnation of Baius, 1567 a.d., to hold that Contrition springing
from Perfect Love reconciles man with God, even before Confession,
and this also outside of cases of necessity or of martyrdom.[272]
Indeed, it is the common doctrine that one single act of Pure Love
abolishes, not only Hell, but Purgatory, so that, if the soul were to
die whilst that act was in operation, it would forthwith be in Heaven.
If then, in case of perfect purity, the soul is at once in heaven, the
soul cannot be quite pure and yet continue in Purgatory.
(2) It is thus plain that, as regards Sin in its relation to the Sinner,
there are, in strictness, ever three points to consider: the guilty act,
the reflex effect of the act upon the disposition the agent, and the
punishment; for all theologians admit that the more or less bad
disposition, contracted through the sinful act, remains in the soul,
except in the case of Perfect Contrition, after the guilt of the act has
been remitted. But whilst the holders of an Extrinsic, Vindictive
Purgatory, work for a punishment as independent as possible of
these moral effects of sin still present in the pardoned soul, the
advocates of an Intrinsic, Ameliorative Purgatory find the
punishment centre in the pain and difficulty attendant upon “getting
slowly back to fully virtuous dispositions, through retracing the steps
we have taken in departing from it.”[273] And the system of
Indulgences appears, in this latter view, to find its chief justification
in that it keeps up a link with the past Penitential system of the
Church; that it vividly recalls and applies the profound truth of the
interaction, for good even more than for evil, between all human
souls, alive and dead; and that it insists upon the readily forgotten
truth of even the forgiven sinner, the man with the good
determination, having ordinarily still much to do and to suffer before
he is quit of the effects of his sin.
(3) And the difficulties and motives special to those who supplant
the Intrinsic, Ameliorating Purgatory by an Extrinsic, Vindicative
Satisfactorium, can indeed be met by those who would preserve that
beautifully dynamic, ethical, and spiritual conception. For we can
hold that the fundamental condition,—the particular determination of
the active will,—remains quite unchanged, from Death to Heaven, in
these souls; that this determination of the active will requires more
or less of time and suffering fully to permeate and assimilate to itself
all the semi-voluntary wishes and habits of the soul; and that this
permeation takes place among conditions in which the soul’s acts are
too little resisted and too certain of success to be constituted
meritorious. We can take Catherine’s beautiful Plunge-conception as
indicating the kind of operation effected in and by the soul, at and
through the momentary vision of God. And we can feel convinced
that it is ever, in the long run, profoundly dangerous to try to clarify
and simplify doctrines beyond or against the scope and direction of
the analogies of Nature and of Grace, which are ever so dynamic
and organic in type: for the poor and simple, as truly as the rich and
learned, ever require, not to be merely taken and left as they are,
but to be raised and trained to the most adequate conceptions
possible to each.—It is, in any case, very certain that the marked
and widespread movement of return to belief in a Middle State is
distinctly towards a truly Purgative Purgatory, although few of these
sincere truth-seekers are aware, as is Dr. Anrich, that they are
groping after a doctrine all but quite explained away by a large body
of late Scholastic and Neo-Scholastic theologians.[274]
(4) Yet it is very satisfactory to note how numerous, and especially
how important are, after all is said, the theologians who have
continued to walk, in this matter, in the footsteps of the great
Alexandrines. St. Gregory of Nyssa teaches a healing of the soul in
the beyond and a purification by fire.[275] St. Augustine says that
“fire burns up the work of him who thinketh of the things of this
world, since possessions, that are loved, do not perish without pain
on the part of their possessor. It is not incredible that something of
this sort takes place after this life.”[276]
St. Thomas declares most plainly: “Venial guilt, in a soul which
dies in a state of grace, is remitted after this life by the purging fire,
because that pain, which is in some manner accepted by the will,
has, in virtue of grace, the power of expiating all such guilt as can
co-exist with a state of grace.” “After this life … there can be merit
with respect to some accidental reward, so long as a man remains in
some manner in a state of probation: and hence there can be
meritorious acts in Purgatory, with respect to the remission of venial
sin.”[277]—Dante (d. 1321) also appears, as Father Faber finely
notes, to hold such a voluntary, immanental Purgatory, where the
poet sees an Angel impelling, across the sea at dawn, a bark filled
with souls bent for Purgatory: for the boat is described as driving
towards the shore so lightly as to draw no wake upon the water.[278]
Cardinal Bellarmine, perhaps the greatest of all anti-Protestant
theologians (d. 1621) teaches that “venial sin is remitted in
Purgatory quoad culpam,” and that “this guilt, as St. Thomas rightly
insists, is remitted in Purgatory by an act of love and patient
endurance.”[279] St. Francis of Sales, that high ascetical authority (d.
1622), declares: “By Purgatory we understand a place where souls
undergo purgation, for a while, from the stains and imperfections
which they have carried away with them from this mortal life.”[280]
And recently and in England we have had Father Faber, Cardinal
Manning, and Cardinal Newman, although differing from each other
on many other points, fully united in holding and propagating this
finely life-like, purgative conception of purgatory.[281]
7. A final difficulty.
One final point concerning a Middle State. In the Synoptic tradition
there is a recurrent insistence upon the forgiveness of particular
sins, at particular moments, by particular human and divine acts of
contrition and pardon. In the Purgatorial teaching the stress lies
upon entire states and habits, stains and perversities of soul, and
upon God’s general grace working, in and through immanently
necessary, freely accepted sufferings, on to a slow purification of the
complete personality. As Origen says: “The soul’s single acts, good
or bad, go by; but, according to their quality, they give form and
figure to to the mind of the agent, and leave it either good or bad,
and destined for pains or for rewards.”[282]
The antagonism here is but apparent. For the fact that a certain
condition of soul precedes, and that another condition succeed, each
act of the same soul, in proportion as this act is full and deliberate,
does not prevent the corresponding, complimentary fact that such
acts take the preceding condition as their occasion, and make the
succeeding condition into a further expression of themselves. Single
acts which fully express the character, whether good or bad, are
doubtless rarer than is mostly thought. Yet Catherine, in union with
the Gospels and the Church, is deeply convinced of the power of one
single act of Pure Love to abolish, not of course the effects outward,
but the reflex spiritual consequences upon the soul itself, of sinful
acts or states.
Catherine’s picture again, of the deliberate Plunge into Purgatory,
gives us a similar heroic act which, summing up the whole soul’s
active volitions, initiates and encloses the whole subsequent
purification, but which itself involves a prevenient act of Divine Love
and mercy, to which this act of human love is but the return and
response. Indeed, as we know, this plunge-conception was but the
direct projection, on to the other-world-picture, of her own personal
experience at her conversion, when a short span of clock-time held
acts of love received and acts of love returned, which transformed all
her previous condition, and initiated a whole series of states ever
more expressive of her truest self.—Act and state and state and act,
each presupposes and requires the other: and both are present in
the Synoptic pictures, and both are operative in the Purgatorial
teaching; although in the former the accounts are so brief as to
make states and acts alike look as though one single act; and, in the
latter, the descriptions are so large as to make the single acts almost
disappear behind the states.
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
textbookfull.com