Learning Theories - Notes
Learning Theories - Notes
4.1 Content
Classical conditioning
Learning by association
● A stimulus is something in our environment that affects us; a response is
our reaction to a stimulus.
● We all have certain reactions to certain stimuli, such as laughing when
being tickled.
● These are known as unconditioned responses (UCR) to unconditioned
stimuli (UCS)
● Unconditioned stimulus: Any stimulus producing a natural, unlearned
response.
● Unconditioned response (UCR): A response that is occurred naturally
without any form of learning because it is based on human biology.
● However, when a neutral stimulus that normally doesn’t affect us on its
own is paired over a period of time with a
UCS, the 2 become associated.
● Neutral stimulus (NS): an environmental
stimulus that does not produce a response
on its own.
● This is known as conditioning.
● After conditioning, the NS becomes a
conditioned stimulus (CS) because it
produces the same reaction from us that
the UCS used to produce. Because the
response is not organic and was artificially
developed, it is known as a conditioned
response (CR).
● Conditioned stimulus (CS): a stimulus that has been associated with an
unconditioned stimulus so that it now produces the same response.
● Conditioned response (CR): a behaviour that is shown in response to a
learned stimulus.
Extinction, spontaneous recovery and stimulus generalisation.
Credibility: Watson & Rayner’s (1920) Lacks application to all cases: David
Baby Albert study H. Barlow (1966)
Operant conditioning
● If the rat pressed the lever, the light came on and a food pellet rolled down the
chute. This is positive reinforcement. At first, the rat would press the lever
accidentally.
● However, the consequence was contiguous (the food was dispensed instantly)
and contingent (the light coming on alerted the rat to what it had done). Rats
quickly learned to press the lever to get food.
● In a variation on this, Skinner electrified the floor of the Skinner Box and
arranged for pressing the lever to turn the electric current off for 30
seconds. This shows negative reinforcement since the rat is learning to remove
something painful. Skinner found that the rats learned to press the lever, but
not as quickly as the rats that were positively reinforced.
Skinner (1948)
● Skinner carried out a famous experiment called ‘Superstition in the Pigeon’.
● Eight pigeons were starved to make them hungry, and then put in a cage.
● At regular intervals every 15 seconds, a food dispenser would swing into the
cage for 5 seconds, then swing out again.
● When the food was about to appear, the pigeons started showing strange
behaviours such as turning anticlockwise or swaying motions.
● Skinner concluded the pigeons were repeating whatever behaviour they
had been doing when the reinforcement was first offered to them.
● Because the food kept reappearing, this senseless behaviour was
strengthened.
● This is like a superstition when humans imagine that by doing something
senseless (ex: crossing their fingers) they can make something pleasant
happen.
Reinforcement
● This is when the desired behaviour is rewarded. This makes it more likely to be
repeated
- Positive reinforcement: rewards the desired behaviour by adding
something pleasant – food, affection, a compliment, money.
- Negative reinforcement: rewards the desired behaviour by removing
something unpleasant – taking away pain or distress, stopping criticism,
cancelling a fine.
● Reinforcement is also split into 2 ways, where there is primary and secondary
reinforcement:
- Primary reinforcement is when the reward is something we want
naturally – a basic need such as food, warmth or affection.
- Secondary reinforcement is a reward we have learned to value – like
money.
Punishment
● This is when undesirable behaviour
produces unpleasant consequences. This
is in order to make the individual stop
the behaviour:
- Positive punishment: when
we add something
unpleasant (ex: criticism,
chores)
- Negative punishment:
removing something pleasant
(being grounded, deducting
money)
● Skinner found that punishment was less effective at changing behaviour than
reinforcement.
● Contingent means that there is a clear link between the person’s behaviour
and the consequence it produces – they know exactly what they are rewarded
or punished for.
● Contiguent means that the consequence follows soon after the behaviour – if
there’s too long a delay, the conditioning is weakened.
Schedules of reinforcement
● When and how often you reinforce behaviour can also have a very big
impact on the strength and likelihood of a behavioural response.
● A lot of Skinner’s research was on how often a reward needs to happen
before the behaviour is learned. He discovered four “schedules” that work
● Interval is related to time, and ratio is related to numbers.
● Continuous reinforcement: the desired behaviour is reinforced every time
it occurs.
● Partial reinforcement: the desired response is only reinforced some of the
time
● The four schedules of partial reinforcement are:
Fixed interval:
- this is when the reward turns up at the regular time. Desirable behaviour
increases the urge to get the reward. (ex: every 5 mins)
- This happened with Skinner’s pigeons. It might happen with humans at
work if there is a regular tea break or “casual Friday”.
- Learning is medium and extinction of learned behaviour is medium.
Variable interval:
- The reward turns up but you can’t be sure exactly when.
- Ex: audience applauding a performer or cheering an athlete.
- Desirable behaviour increases more slowly but stays at a steady rate.
- Learning is fast, but extinction is slow.
Fixed ratio:
- The reward occurs every time the desired behaviour is carried out so often.
(the number of times you execute the desired behaviour, you get
rewarded)
- Skinners rats got a reward every time they pressed the lever.
- A human might get paid for every 100 products they build.
- If you don’t do the behaviour, you get nothing. If you work fast, you get paid
a lot.
- Learning is fast, and extinction is moderate.
Variable ratio:
- The reward is dispensed randomly, after a changing number of behaviours
such as feeding the rat after one lever press, then after 5, then after 3.
- For humans, this might be like a slot machine because you don't know how
many times you’ll have to pay in before it pays out.
- Learning is fast and extinction is slow.
Strengths of operant conditioning Weaknesses of operant conditioning
Credibility:
Research in support of operant
conditioning including Skinner (1948)
into pigeons.
Because the theory only looks at
behaviours (rather than cognitions),
every step in the conditioning process is
observable. This adds to the credibility
of the theory since you can see it
happen with your own eyes.
Key terms:
● Modelling: a way of learning by imitating the behaviour
● Role model: significant individuals in a person’s life. You are more likely to
imitate such role models
● Vicarious reinforcement: learning through the consequence of another
person’s behaviour
Attention
● This tells us that you must be attending to the behaviour of the role model.
● This depends on many factors such as the distinctiveness of the behaviour
being modelled
● It also depends on factors within the person observing, such as their level of
arousal.
● Bandura proposed that a child is more likely to attend a role model who is
similar to themselves; eg- the same gender
Retention
● The individual must retain or store the action they have attended to.
● This is to help recall it later when reproducing the behaviour
Reproduction
● This is being capable of carrying out the modelled behaviour
● Bandura made it clear that factors such as the physical capabilities of the
individual, as well as their own self-observation of reproduction, were
factors that affected it.
● Ex: if the behaviour is beyond our capabilities, it cannot be reproduced
Motivation
● You must have a reason to carry out the behaviour
● Ex: being rewarded
● Intrinsic motivation refers to the doing of an activity where there may be an
internal satisfaction such as feeling good because you feel more like your
role model.
● Extrinsic motivation is a motivator that is tangible, ex: copying a famous
footballer in order to achieve a trophy like them.
● Vicarious reinforcement takes place here as the observer believes that the
reward their role model is getting will be something they can gain if they
copied their role model. Notice that they are not getting the reward right
away, hence the term ‘vicarious’.
Sample
● 72 children from the Stanford university Nursery School: (36 boys and 36
girls), mean age = 52 months
● He had an equal number of girls and boys and matched them on how
aggressive they were.
● Bandura had 6 participants in 8 different experimental groups and 24
control children.
● Half of the experimental group saw aggressive role models
● He split the groups again so half the subjects in the non-aggressive and
aggressive conditions saw a same-sex role model
● The control group simply didn't get exposed to a role model and their
behaviour was observed when the children were allowed to play with toys
● Bandura asked an experimenter and nursery teacher to rate each child
for aggression on a 5-point scale
Procedure
Results
● The children who observed an aggressive role model showed a lot of verbal
and physical aggression that resembled the scripted routine the model had
acted out.
● There was very little aggressive behaviour in the Non-Aggressive Model
condition and in the Control condition; around 70% had a score of zero for
aggression. Children from the Non-Aggressive Model condition spent the most
time sitting quietly.
● In general, a male role model had a bigger influence than a female role model:
the aggressive male model produced more aggression; the non-aggressive
male model produced more calm.
● Compare the boys’ physical aggression after a male aggressive role model
(average 25.8 acts) to the girls’ after a female aggressive role model (5.5)
● Compare the girls’ verbal aggression after a female aggressive role model (13.7)
to the boys after a male aggressive role model (12.7)
● Mallet Aggression is high even for the Control group (about 13 acts on average,
regardless of gender), but a non-aggressive role model reduces it to 0.5 for
girls, 6.7 for boys
● Even in the Control group, non-imitative aggression is higher for boys (24.6)
than girls (6.1)
Conclusions
● Bandura concludes that behaviour can be learned by imitation even if it
hasn’t been reinforced (as Skinner suggested).
Evaluations
Generalisability Generalisability
Samples were large enough that Sample was taken from the same
anomalies might be cancelled out. nursery so they are unrepresentative
of normal children as they were from
Both males and females the nursery of top university
Reliability Validity
His experiment was replicated in 1963 Lacks external validity as they were
and 1965 due to standardised put in a strange situation in a
procedure controlled setting
Used 2 observers behind the one-way Lacks internal validity as the bobo
mirror so creates inter-rater reliability was an object designed to be
as a behaviour had to be noted by punched. Children would suppose
both observers to be validly the experimenters wanted them to
play with the doll this way, so it may
Filmed the 1963 study so increases be demand characteristics
the reliability of his results
Other studies such as Raine et al
suggest that aggressin is linked to
biological factors such as brain
deficits
Application Ethics:
Can be applied to parenting and Harm and wellbeing of participants
teaching styles by behaving well in were not considered as children may
order for your child to behave well. have been distressed by the
aggressive behaviour. This is an
Bandura, Ross & Ross (1963a) suggest example of what the BPS Code of
that TV censorship should be Ethics calls "normalising unhelpful
considered seriously as it suggests behaviours".
that children can learn aggressive
behaviour even from cartoon No informed consent by the children
violence on their own and no debriefing took
place
Bandura would argue that the benefits Loftus and weaber (1998) argue that
to society outweighed the risks to any the study was unethical and morally
of the children that took part. His wrong, suggesting that the
research has shown us the influence participants were manipulated to
that role models have on aggressive respond in an aggressive way
behaviour, especially role models on TV
and film.
strengths weaknesses
The greatest strength of SLT is that it SLT also ignores the nature side of the
explains things that Behaviourism nature/nurture debate. It may be that
cannot. SLT proposes that huge some people are born with
“chunks” of behaviour can be learned “in predispositions to certain behaviours
one go” through observation and (like aggression) and don’t need role
imitation, instead of repeated models.
procedures of conditioning
4.1.4 Freud’s psychosexual stages (oral, anal, phallic, latent and genital)
and the role of the unconscious in the development of personality.
Therapies/treatments
Topographical model of the mind
● However, the child also fears that he will be punished by the father for
these feelings, a fear Freud termed ‘castration anxiety’
● Eventually, the child begins to identify with the same-sex parent as a
means of vicariously possessing the other parent.
● For girls, however, Freud believed that penis envy was never fully resolved
and that all women remain somewhat fixated on this stage.
● Psychologist Karen Horney disputed this theory, calling it both inaccurate
and demanding to women. She proposed that men experience feelings of
inferiority because they cannot give birth to children (womb envy).
● Phallic fixation can make you grow up to be vain, insecure and envious.
Strengths Weaknesses
Credibility Objections
newborn babies' brains do work Freud’s ideas are criticised for not
differently until they develop language; being scientific enough. He
the right hemisphere that is so active psychoanalysed his patients and
in the first months of life does tie in himself and his conclusions are
with Freud's view of the id and the interpretations.
unconscious mind.
Erik Erikson - suggested that
Crucial memories from early childhood humans go through far more stages
may be stored in the right hemisphere
than the 5 freud identified. He stated
but cannot be "put into words" by the
that stages go all the way into olds
left hemisphere. This ties in very closely
age and each is defined by a
with Freud's idea of the unconscious
particular crisis to overcome.
mind influencing the conscious mind.
Similarities Differences
Some biological psychologists also Biological psychologists agree that
support nature and nurture. They young children form very strong
would say that genes only give us attachments to their parents as a
predispositions but that experiences survival trait. However, nothing more
later in life decide whether we act on than this. Freud’s ideas of this
those predispositions or whether they meaning of attachment and what it
stay hidden inside us. feels like and how it becomes a part
of our personalities aren’t really
Freud’s ideas that the child develops
the id first ad then the ego is scientific ideas at all - Sir Karl Popper
supported by biology as babies use argued that this idea cannot be
their right brains extensively but then proved or disproved so it lacks
the left brain develops language and evidence.
logical faculties at about the age of 5.
Applications: Applications
Counter-conditioning
● This is when the feared object is paired with something else that produces
an incompatible response, like pleasure, relaxation or humour.
● Wolpe taught his patients relaxation techniques like controlled breathing.
● Larry Ventis uses humour therapy as a type of counter-conditioning in his
study (Ventis et al, 2001)
● The idea is that instead of their old Conditioned Response (CR) of fear, the
patient learns a new CR, like relaxing or laughing.
Graduated Exposure
● The therapist and the patient work out a
STIMULATION HIERARCHY - a list of encounters
with the feared thing, going from the least intense
to the most intense.
● It's very important that the stimulation hierarchy is
created by the patient not the therapist. This is for
two reasons:
- Patient can have control over how the
therapy proceeds, this makes the process
relaxing.
- Ethical reasons to gain consent from the patient before putting them in
the distressing situation is within the ethical guidelines.
Participant modelling
● Systematic desensitisation is based on classical conditioning but also social
learning theory.
● Douglas Bernstein (1979) calls this participant modelling.
● The first step on the simulation hierarchy would be to watch someone else
model the relaxation techniques and encounter the feared object before
trying it yourself.
● With really severe phobias, the patient can't even bear to watch someone
else encounter the feared object. For this case, Richard Sharf (2000)
recommends covert modelling.
● Covert modelling: where the first step on the simulation hierarchy is to
imagine someone else encountering the feared object.
Evaluation
Strengths Weaknesses
Free association
● This is a type of therapy where the client has a conversation with the
psychoanalyst. This encourages the client to talk freely about any thoughts,
allowing unconscious ones to emerge
● The therapist can tell the patient why the maladaptive thought is causing
problems.
● They then offer a solution to implement new ways to avoid the unconscious
thought happening again.
● This often involves a therapist giving a word or idea, and the patient
immediately responding with the first word that comes to mind.
Strengths Weaknesses
Dream analysis
● Dream analysis - the process of assigning meaning to dreams.
● Freud claims that the analysis of dreams is “the royal road to the
unconscious”. He argued that the conscious mind is like a censor but it is
less vigilant when we are asleep.
● He believed that repressed ideas come to the surface through what we
remember may well have been altered during the dream process.
● Dream analysis is a process of gaining themes and symbols from dreams
and interpreting the inner conflicts through the analysis of dreams.
● Freud proposed that dreams consist of manifest content and latent
content.
● Manifest content: what we actually see
● Latent content: hidden meaning or messages behind what we see in a
dream.
● The dream analysis therapist's role is to take the manifest content
described by the client and help guide them to understand the latent
content of the dreams, in order for the patient to understand the root
cause of their behaviour and find a way to combat and resolve the
issue.
Strengths Weaknesses
Application: Validity:
Dream analysis is very subjective so
Components of dream analysis have goes against the objective aims of
been applied to other psychological psychology as it relies on the
treatments such as CBT (changing subjective interpretation of the
content of nightmares to positive) therapist
Credibility: Generalisability:
Matt and Navarro (1997) reviewed 63 Cannot be used to treat all types of
meta-analyses of psychotherapy and disorders such as autism, attention
found that 75% of clients who received deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)
dream analysis showed some form of or memory deficits
improvement
Transference
● Transference is when a situation occurs where the feelings, desires and
expectations of one person are redirected and applied to another person.
● Transference refers to a therapeutic setting where a person in therapy may
apply certain feelings or emotions toward the therapist.
● This concept was first described by Sigmund Freud who noted the deep,
intense and unconscious feelings that sometimes developed within the
therapeutic relationships he established with those he was treating.
Types of transference:
● Paternal transference - individual looks at another person as a father ⇒
expects protection / wise personality
● Maternal transference - individual treats another person as a mother ⇒
vied as loving / comfort is expected
● Sibling transference - occur when parental relationships are lacking
● Non-familial transference - when individuals treat others according to an
idealized version of what they are expected to be rather than who they
actually are. (doctors expected to cure and be rational at all times)
● Sexualized transference - may occur when a person in therapy develops a
sexual attraction to their therapist
● Positive transference can lead the person in therapy to view the therapist
as kind, concerned, or otherwise helpful.
● Negative transference might cause a person in therapy to direct angry or
painful feelings toward the therapist, but the therapist may still be able to
use these emotions to help the person achieve greater understanding.
Transference in therapy
● When transference occurs in a therapeutic setting, a therapist may be able
to better understand an individual and help the person in therapy achieve
results and recovery
● Transference may occur between a therapist and person in therapy (ex:
therapist may be viewed as all-knowing guru, ideal lover, fierce opponent)
● Transference is a therapeutic tool crucial in understanding an individual’s
unconscious or repressed feelings.
● Healing is likely to occur once these underlying issues are effectively
exposed and addressed.
● TFP - transference-focused therapy harnesses the transference that occurs
in therapy to help individuals gain insight into their own behaviour and
thought patterns and is used to treat BPD
Countertransference
● Occurs when therapists transfer their emotions to a person in therapy.
● This is often a reaction to transference
● Sigmund Freud developed the concept of countertransference where he
suggests that its a largely unconscious phenomenon in which the
psychologist's emotions are influenced by a person in therapy.
● It is necessary for therapists to master the tendency to countertransference
emotions or feelings
● There is positive and negative countertransference:
- Positive countertransference may be used to help open up a patient
by sharing the therapists experiences and feelings based on a
particular subject matter
- Negative countertransference is not being able to control attraction
to the patient when hearing their trauma
Strength Weakness
● The action of splitting takes place over time where the infant’s mental
separation of objects to ‘good’ and ‘bad’ takes place.
● Ex: the caregiver is ‘good’ when all the infant’s needs are satisfied and ‘bad’
when they are not.
● Initially, these 2 aspects of the object (caregiver) are separated in the mind
of the infant. A similar process occurs when the infant comes to perceive
good and bad parts of themselves.
● Mother is satisfactory to infants needs ⇒ infant thinks mom is good ⇒
infant thinks he is good ⇒ infant thinks they’re relationship is good.
● Vice versa for when needs are not satisfied.
● This can cause difficulty in future relationships.
Strengths Weaknesses
Gives more objectivity to the data: It Not effective for certain disorders such
relies more on the patient opening up as depression where clients may not
unlike the psychoanalysis method. be motivated to engage with the
Hence, there is less interpretive work therapist ⇒ drug treatments may be
and more real conclusions better
Observations
Tallying
● Data collection in observational research might include tallying where
oververs write down when and how many times certain behaviours
occurred.
● They can use notes or audio/video recordings to determine behavioural
patterns during the research
● The categories for observation need to be clear and unambiguous
● Training and standardisation of observers is needed where more than one
observer is making an assessment.
● Due to the potential volume of data to be recorded, researchers often use
sampling to gather information.
Time sampling
● This involves making observations at different time intervals, (ex: every 30
seconds) and recording what is observed.
strengths Weaknesses
strengths Weaknesses
Can record every occurrence of each Gives no indication of the relative time
behaviour to give a complete record spent on each behavioural category
Records are easy to obtain and analyse Gives no indication of the order in
as they are just totals which events from each behavioural
category occur
Naturalistic observation
● This technique involves observing participants in their natural
environment.
● Its often used where it would be unethical to manipulate variables
● The situation has not been created by the researcher and so allows them to
gain a real insight into a person’s behaviour.
Strengths Weaknesses
Stuructured observations
● Structured observations are staged observations and are normally carried
out within an environment in which the researcher has some control such
as a laboratory.
● Structured observations are used to gather information which can be
difficult to gather from naturalistic observations
● Structured observations are more reliable than naturalistic observations as
the coding systems used allow for replicability.
Strengths Weaknesses
Good structured observations will have Less validity as its open to observer
a naturalistic feel and so natural bias as the researcher may interpret
behaviour can be observed behaviours in a way that fits into the
planned behavioural categories
● The above 2 observations can be non-participant or participant
observations
Non-participant observations
● This is when the researcher observes behaviour of others but does not form
part of the group they study
Strengths Weaknesses
Participant observations
● A form of observation where the researcher takes an active role in the
situation being observed
Strengths Weaknesses
Overt observations
● A form of observation where those being observed are aware of the
presence of an observer
Strengths Weaknesses
If being observed for long periods, Social desirability may increase as they
people tend to forget about observers are being aware of the observation.
and behave more naturally Reducing validity
Covert observation
● A form of observation where the participants do not know they are being
observed
Strengths Weaknesses
● Thematic and content analysis differ because the thematic analysis is used
purely for qualitative research and gives a detailed account of key themes
and categories.
● However, content analysis uses coding units to quantify the themes within
a qualitative data set.
Sample
● Artefacts are analysed in this process, so it needs to be representative.
● Ex: if your researching gender stereotypes in car adverts, look at both male
and female magazines
Coding system
● The researcher has to create a coding system which breaks down the
content into coding units
● This is when the researcher has identified themes such as ‘driving a car’
‘washing the car’, and then make tallys as to how many times in these
magazines, male and female roles are doing such acts
Results
● Depending on the number of tally’s the researcher can now quantify their
data and make conclusions
● For instance, they can conclude on whether or not there is a gender bias in
the way cars are being advertised.
Evaluation of content analysis
Strengths Weaknesses
Generalisability Genearalisability
Content analysis allows comparison Content analysis depends on if the
of artefacts drom different times to artefacts being studied consists of a
see if behaviours change over time. wide group or not.
Ex: if the research is on a recording of
conversations in a small community,
cannot be generalised
Reliability Application
Content analysis can easily be Causality cannot be established as
replicated by others. ⇒ inter-rater you cant identity why the behaviour
reliability occurs using content analysis. This
can only be done through
Reliable way to analyse qualitative experiments
information as coding units are not
open to interpretation and can be
used with different researchers
Application Validity
Easy technique to use and not too Observer bias - different observers
time consuming might interpret meanings of
categories in coding systems
Statistical data can be shown for differently
reports using tally frequencies,
chi-squared test for nominal level Culture bias as the interpretation will
data, and histograms for frequency be affected by the language and
data culture of the observer
Validity Ethics
High ecological validity as they are If social responsibility is not
based on observations of what considered, it may go against code of
people actually do conduct as using images of religious
fundamentalist videos or violent
No chance of demand characteristics material may be difficult for the
as the person creating the artefact minority or the researcher as well.
did not know that it would be
analysed
Ethics
No risk for content analysis as these
are public information that is already
released
Case studies
Lack of generalisability
● Freud was attempting to demonstrate that boys (Little Hans) fear of horses
was related to his Oediups Complex.
● Freud argued that the fear of the horse was a reflection of his fear of the
father and the fear that the horse would bite him represented his
castraction anxiety
● Freud thought that during the phallic stage, a body develops intense
sexual love for his mothers
● Hence, sees his father as a rival and wants to get rid of him
● The father however is far bigger and more powerful than the young boy so
the child develops the fear that seeing his dad as a rival will leave the father
to castrate him.
● The young boy develps a mechanism for coping with it, using a defense
mechanism known as identification with the aggressor
● He stresses all the ways similar to his father in order to attract the mother
● Freud saw that the Oedipus Complex resolved when Hans fantasized
himself with a big penis like his father’s and married to his mother with his
father present in the role of grandfather.
● Hans recovered from his phobia after his father assured him that he had no
intention of cutting off his penis
4.3 Studies
Classic study
Aims(s)
● To investigate whether emotional responses could be conditioned in a
controlled laboratory setting.
● Specifically to investigate whether fear could be conditioned in a young
baby aged from nine to eleven months old. They wanted to see if:
- Fear of a white rat could be conditioned in a young child using the
loud sound of a hammer hitting a steel bar.
- Whether the fear response, if one was conditioned, would transfer to
similar objects. (stimulus generalisation)
- The effects of time on a conditioned fear response.
- If the fear response did not disappear after an amount of time could
it be deconditioned. (extinction)
Procedure
● The study was carried out on a healthy, emotionally stable child called Albert,
who was nine months old at the start of the study.
● At about nine months of age, Albert was presented with a lot of objects that
might bring fear, but he was not scared.
(you don't need to remember when they gave what object, just remember that it
was a step-by-step process)
● At eight months and 26 days old Albert was exposed to a hammer hitting a
suspended steel bar, causing Albert to startle. The third time this was carried
out Albert cried.
● 11 months 3 days: Albert was presented with a white rat and just as his hand
touched the rat the metal bar was hit by the hammer. This was done a second
time and Albert jumped violently and began to whimper.
● 11 months 10 days: The rat was presented to Albert with no sound. He was also
presented with blocks after the rat was taken away. He played with the blocks.
Then the rat was presented and the sound was made, Albert was startled and
fell over. This was done another two times before the rat was presented on its
own again. There were a further two joint presentations before the rat was
presented on its own for the third time.
● 11 months 15 days: Albert was shown the rat on its own two times, he played
with the blocks between each presentation. Albert was then shown the rabbit
on its own, followed by the dog, a seal fur coat, cotton wool and Watson’s head
to see if Albert would play with his hair. He was also presented with a Santa
Claus mask. Blocks were given to Albert between each item for him to play
with and calm him down.
● 11 months 20 days: Albert was presented with the rat alone, and then the rat
was placed on his hand and the steel bar hit. After this he was presented with
the rat alone two more times, followed by the rabbit. After being given the
blocks to play with the rabbit was again presented, and as Albert reached for it
the steel bar was hit by the hammer, and then the rabbit was presented on its
own. The same procedure was carried out for the dog.
● On the same day Albert was taken to a well-lit lecture room where he was
presented with the rat alone, the rabbit alone, the dog alone, then the rat a
second time followed by the rat and the loud noise. Albert was then shown the
rat on its own twice followed by the rabbit and the dog
● 1 year 21 days: Albert was presented with the Santa Claus mask followed by
the fur coat, the rat, the rabbit and the dog, with blocks being given to Albert
between the presentations of each object.
Results
● 11 months 10 days: Albert did not reach for the rat at first. When the rat’s nose
touched his hand he withdrew his hand. When the rat was presented on its
own for the second time Albert whimpered and moved his body ways from the
rat. On the third presentation of the rat on its own Albert began to cry, turned
away from the rat sharply and began to crawl
away from rat.
● 11 months 15 days:
- Albert whimpered when he saw the
rat for the first time
- 2nd time, he crawled away from it.
He showed slight fear for rabbits and
dogs too.
- Albert wouldn't play with Watson's
hair and showed a negative reaction
to the Santa Claus mask.
● 11 months 20 days:
- All his reactions were a little less
from 11 months and 15 days
Conclusions
● It was concluded that emotional transfer does take place. (generalisation does
take place)
● It was also concluded that conditioned emotional responses last for at least a
week, and that conditioned fears can generalise to other similar objects.
(Meaning he developed fears of anything that was fluffy or white)
● Watson and Rayner also concluded that emotional disturbances in adults can
be traced back to conditioning.
Evaluation of the experiment
Strengths Weaknesses
Validity: The study has careful controls. limitations included no control subject
For example, Watson hid behind a and no objective measurement of the
curtain when striking the iron bar so fear response in Little Albert (e.g. the
that Albert would associate the noise dependent variable was not
with the rat, not with him or the bar or operationalized).
the hammer.
Moreover, Albert's mother gave consent The setting for the experiment lacks
and was present the whole time, so this ecological validity because Albert was
was clearly valid presumptive consent. away from his playroom and familiar
She was able to withdraw Albert and did nurses.
in fact do so (though not for an ethical
reason: she merely moved to another
job).
Reported all stages of their study so Watson's conclusions are in line with
it's reliable as it can be replicated what would be predicted by Classical
Conditioning. When a study fits with a
well-established theory, it has construct
validity.
● This process involves carefully reading and considering the qualitative data
gathered and identifying the themes present in the data that occur
frequently.
● Then the researcher will develop the themes into ‘codes’ - which are like
categories
● Codes will then be analysed and searched in the data for instances where it
appears
● Thematic analysis is used in psychology research when the researcher
wants to explain a phenomenon investigated in-depth.
Thematic analysis
Advantages Disadvantages
● Based on the 1986 Act, the British Psychological Society (BPS) has published
Guidelines for Psychologists Working with Animals (2012).
- Legal requirements: Research must not break the law regarding
endangered and protected species. (particulary the great apes -
chimpanzees, gorillas, etc)
- Replacement: live animals should only be used as the last option. They
should be replaced with alternatives such as computer simulations as
much as possible.
- Choice of species: species raised in captivity are more ethical than wild
animals. Research should be minimised if it involves highly sensitive
animals.
- Reduction: The number of animals used should be minimised as much
as possible
- Animal care: when not being experimented on, they should be given
food, water and free space for companionship with their species.
- Disposal: when research is over, animals should be disposed of by being
kept alive for breeding or as pets
- Procedures: Animals must be treated humanely during research. The
BPS gives special consideration to these three areas: caging,
deprivation, and pain.
Read Exam questions carefully. The ethical and practical issues about using animals
in research are separate; don’t answer on one when you’ve been asked about the
other.
Strengths Weaknesses
The 1986 Act and the BPS Guidelines There have been poor research such
ensure that animals are protected and as ones by Harlow which has caused
only the most beneficial, high quality distress on many animals.
and humane research goes on.
Other tools such as the Bateson Cube
Decision-making process are
considered to provide ethical research.
Sample
● 41 people who had a fear of flying
● 20 in treatment group. 21 control group with no treatment
● participants were volunteers who had responded to a media campaign
Procedure
● The patients gave an interview on their life history and aspects of their fear
of flying using the IDG-FV
● Anxiety in relation to different flight situations was measured using the
EMV
● EPAV=A and EPAV-B were used to measure the frequency of catastrophic
thoughts and physiological symptoms that may present in different flight
situations.
● Heart rate, muscle tension and skin temperature were also measured.
● The EMV scales looked at fear during flying, fear of flight preliminaries and
fear of flying without any direct involvement.
● The EPAV scales measured catastrophic thoughts and physiological
anxiety.
● Patients had about 2 one hour sessions per week as part of a standardised
desensitisation programme, they all had at least twelve sessions with the
maximum number of sessions being fifteen.
● The treatment involved the use in vivo and imagination techniques with an
emphasis on the hierarchy. They used the techniques of stop thinking and
brief relaxation.
Results
● They compared the heart rate, temperature and muscle measurement, as
well as other controls with their rates before the therapy and with the
control group.
● There was no difference in any of the measurement between the control
groups and the treatment groups before treatment.
● It was found that there was a significant difference between the control
group and those who had treatment on all measures apart from the fear
when there was no personal involvement and palm temperature.
● Only 10% of patients who had the treatment did not have a significant
reduction in their fear level concerning flying.
Conclusion
● It was concluded that systematic desensitisation is effective in reducing the
fear of flying.
● It was also concluded that the simple passage of time did not help reduce
phobias as there was no improvement in the control groups.
Evaluation
Strengths Weaknesses
Reliability: Generalisability:
Used a number of strict controls such 20 out of 41 is a realively small sample.
as the temperature of the room being Only shows systemic desensitisation is
at 22.5c, armchair being positioned at effective for fear of flying
1.8 meters from television, and the
same psychometrics for each Volunteer sample so only certain type
participant ⇒ test-retest reliability of people were used in the experiment
Applications:
Shows systemic desensitisation is
effective
Validity: Validity:
Carried out in a controlled setting so Lacks internal validity as it requires
has high internal validity by clients to imagine the fearful situation
eliminating extraneous variables which cannot be effective as some
people cant create vivid images
Psych measures had previously been (individual differences)
shown to be valid and reliable. Eg: fear
of flying scales had better than +0.85 Long process to be effective
test-restest scores
Although anxiety was measured
thoroughly before & after treatment,
not sure how long the benefits lasted
Ethics:
Valid consent was gained
Generalisability:
Participants were matched on age and
sex so can be generalised
One contemporary study from the following two
choices:
Aims
● To investigate whether playing violent video games has dehumanising
consequences in relation to others and the self. (self perception and
perception of others)
● Study 1: Aimed to investigate effects in a violent video game context
● Study 2: aimed to investigate whether playing violently against computer
avatars rather than actual humans had any effect on self-perived humanity
Procedure - study 1
● Game - Mortal Kombat (players play against each other)
● Sample: 106 participants who were undergrads (age: 17 - 34 years)
● Allocation: random allocation of participants to 2 groups
● Participants viewed the same screen but were separated by a wall so that
thye couldn’t see each other
● 52 played Mortal Kombat (violent game). Other 54 played Spin Tennis
(non-violent game)
● With a scale of 1-7, Participants were asked on:
- how much they enjoyed the game
- How frustrating they found the game
Procedure - study 2
● Game: call of duty 2 (played with another player who was a computer
generated avatar)
● Sample: 38 participants, all undergrads
● Allocation: random allocation to 2 conditions: playing either Call of Duty or
Spin tennis
● The screen was split into two so the participants could see their own view
point and their co-players viewpoint.
● They had to think about their experience of playing the game as they
answered the items on humanness.
● The self-esteem and mood of the participants were measured to ensure
they did not affect the results (using 20 item PANAS, self-esteem: State
Self-Esteem Scale)
Results
● Study 1 - summary of means for self humany and perceived humanity of
opponent’s:
● Those who played the violent game saw themselves as less human than
those who played the non-violent game
● no difference between the perception of the co-players’ humanity for
violent and non-violent games
Conclusions
● Study 1: concluded that applying of violent video games does decrease
perceived humanity of both the player and other people they are playing
against
● Study 2:
- concluded that playing violent vidoe games reduces perception of
our own humanity.
- concluded that playing violent video games does not make us feel
bad or see ourselves in a more negative life, it only affects how
human we feel
- Playing a violent video game with another person rather than
against them does not affect how human we see our co-player
Evaluation
Strengths Weaknesses
Validity: Validity:
Has high internal validity as random (internal) - Results may not be valid as
allocation ensured that gamers and the authors do not tell us about the
non-gamers are randomly allocated to participants’ previous gaming
reduce participant variables. experience and whether this affected
the self /other perceptions of humanity
post gaming. (ex: experienced gamers
with high self esteem)
Generaliability: Generalisability:
Used large sample of 106 with both There were 2x as many women than
males and females. males in the sample. This may lead to
gender bias. Also, all participants were
undergrads with the mean age of 19.
Any younger or older players may not
relate to the results found in this study.
Reliability: Application:
Results can be tested for reliability as Many psychologists argue that
it followed a standardised and Bastian’s findings lack application as
controlled procedure with many self-reporting feeling less human 15
variables controlled such as playing mins after playing a game does not
the same game for the same amount mean that your long-term intentions
of time. Or being blocked to not see towards others or real world
opponent. behaviours will change (make u more
Questionnaire were used to increase violent)
objectivity and reduce interpretation.
⇒ test-retest reliability increases
Application: Ethics:
Positive outcomes of the study could Deceived of real aim which was shown
be used to encourage co-operative during the lack of any suspicion
games to enhance feelings of expressed in debriefing.
humanity in rela world. This could
reduce problems of aggression
Credibility:
Videogames increase aggression:
Anderson & Bushman 2001
Bluemke et al 2010