NAME OF STUDENT: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

COURSE NAME & LEVEL:…………………………………………………………………………………………….,,………………….

MODULE………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

MODULE NUMBER/ CODE……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

DATE GIVEN…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

DUE DATE……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

LECTURERS NAME……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

FIELDBASEDPRACTICAL/ASSIGNMENT/TESTNUMBER………………………………………………………………………

QUESTION or TOPIC…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

MARK OBTAINED……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

DATE MARKED…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

MARKERS NAME ANDSIGNATURE……………………………………………………………………………………………………

MARKERSCOMMENTS……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Group 6 Participants

1. Tanaka Makomichi
2. Cuthbert Dube
3. Gilan Manzeke
4. Tinashe Madhume
5. Blessing Mafaro
6. Nelson Mhlanga
7. William Marondera
8. Tinotenda Nyamhunga
9. Tinotenda Mutero
10. Tinotenda Musiyiwa
11. Bradley Shoriwa
12. Anesu Gavi
13. Natalie Magombera
14. Kudzaishe Vanessa Nhende
15. Hillary Chipashu
16. Tariroyashe Ndhlovu
17. Dexter Nduna
18. Ropafadzo Mashanda
19. Ethan Girambira
20. Right Muregi
21. Ropafadzo Nesvinga
 NC Geotechnical Engineering
Practical 1: Lab tests

Describe the following:

1.Sand replacement test
2.Core cutter method
3.Constant head permeater
4.Variable head permeater
5.Direct shear test
6.Unconfined compression test
7.Triaxial test (no pore pressure and volume change measurement)
8.Compaction test
9.Standard and modified compaction tests
10.Cone penetration tests
11.CBR tests
12.Determination of specific gravity
N.B: Clearly explain the aim of the lab test, it's method and how you interpret the
results.
1.Sand Replacement Test
Aim: The sand replacement test is conducted to determine the in-place density of
natural or compacted soil. This information can be used to evaluate the degree of compaction
achieved during construction and to assess the suitability of the soil for various engineering
applications.

Materials:
1. Soil sample: The soil sample should be collected carefully to ensure it represents the
natural condition of the site. It should be free from organic materials, large particles,
and debris.
2. Sand: A clean, dry, and uniform sand is required for the test. The sand should pass
through a specific sieve size, typically 4.75 mm (No. 4 sieve).
3. Sand pouring cylinder: A cylindrical container with a known volume is used to pour
the sand into the test hole.
4. Calibration container: A metal container of known volume is required to calibrate the
sand pouring cylinder.
5. Balance: A balance capable of accurately measuring the mass of the soil and sand is
necessary

Diagram:
Method:
1. Calibration:
a. Determine the volume of the calibration container accurately.
b. Weigh the empty sand pouring cylinder and record its mass.
c. Fill the sand pouring cylinder with sand and weigh it again to determine the mass of
sand required to fill the cylinder.
d. Repeat the above steps a few times to obtain an average mass of sand.

2. Test procedure:
a. Dig a hole in the ground and carefully collect a representative soil sample.
b. Weigh the empty sand pouring cylinder and record its mass.
c. Place the soil sample in the cylinder until it is about three-quarters full.
d. Weigh the filled cylinder with soil and record its mass.
e. Empty the soil from the cylinder and fill it with sand up to the same level as before.
f. Weigh the sand-filled cylinder and record its mass.
g. Pour the sand from the cylinder into the hole left by the soil.
h. Weigh the empty sand pouring cylinder again to determine the mass of sand
poured.
i. Measure the volume of the test hole.

3. Calculation:
a. Determine the mass of soil in the cylinder by subtracting the mass of the empty
cylinder from the mass of the filled cylinder.
b. Calculate the bulk density of the soil using the mass of soil and the volume of the
test hole.
c. Calculate the dry density of the soil by considering the moisture content of the soil
sample.

Interpretation of Results: The test results provide information on the density

of the soil at a specific location, which can be crucial for construction projects to
ensure proper compaction and stability. The sand replacement test provides two main results:
bulk density and dry density of the soil sample.
1. Bulk density: It is the ratio of the mass of soil to the volume of the test hole. It indicates the
overall density of the soil, including both solid particles and pore spaces.
2. Dry density: It is the ratio of the mass of solid particles to the volume of the soil sample,
excluding the moisture content. It represents the compactness of the soil and is an essential
parameter for evaluating its engineering properties.
The results obtained from the test can be used to compare the achieved density with the
maximum or optimum density to assess the compaction efficiency. It can also help classify
the soil based on its compaction characteristics and determine its suitability for various
construction applications.

It's important to note that the specific calculations and interpretations may vary depending on
the standards or guidelines followed by the laboratory conducting the test.

2.Core Cutter Method

Aim: The core cutter method is used to determine the in-situ dry density of cohesive
or compacted soils.

Materials:
1. Core cutter: it is a cylindrical steel tool with a cutting edge at one end and a
detachable base plate at the other.
2. Sampling equipment: this includes a steel driving dolly, a hammer and a thin-walled
sample tube with a cutting shoe.

Diagram:

Method:
1. Preparation: A suitable location is selected for testing, and the area is cleared of
vegetation and debris. The core cutter is cleaned and calibrated before use. The
sample tube is checked for any damages or deformations.
 2. Sample collection: The core cutter is driven into the soil using the driving dolly and
hammer. The cutter penetrates the soil to a specified depth, usually around 150 mm.
The collected soil sample is called a core.

3. Extraction: The core cutter is carefully lifted upward, ensuring the sample remains
intact within it. The core is then extruded from the cutter and placed in an airtight
container for further testing.

4. Sample preparation: The core is weighed to determine its wet mass. Afterward, it is
oven-dried to remove all moisture content. The dried sample is then weighed to
determine its dry mass.

5. Calculation: Using the wet and dry masses, the moisture content of the soil can be
calculated as a percentage. The volume of the core cutter is also measured.

6. Interpretation of results: The density of the soil is calculated by dividing the dry mass
of the soil by the volume of the core cutter. The moisture content provides
information about the water content of the soil, which affects its compaction
characteristics.

Interpretation of Results: The results obtained from this test help in

evaluating the compaction level of soils and ensuring that they meet the required
engineering specifications. If the density is lower than the desired value, it indicates
inadequate compaction, while a higher density may suggest over compaction. Similarly,
moisture content outside the specified range can affect the soil's engineering properties.

Overall, the core cutter method provides valuable information about the in-situ density and
moisture content of cohesive soils, aiding in the assessment of their compaction
characteristics and suitability for engineering projects.

3.Constant Head Permeameter

Aim: The constant head permeameter test is performed to determine the coefficient
of permeability (hydraulic conductivity) of granular soils

Materials:
1. Constant head permeameter apparatus: It consists of a soil specimen chamber, a water
reservoir, a standpipe, a manometer, and a valve system to control water flow.
2. Soil specimen: A cylindrical soil sample of known dimensions and compacted to the
desired density.

Diagram:

.
Method:
1. Preparation: The soil specimen chamber is cleaned and assembled. The soil sample is
prepared by compacting it to the desired density and placing it in the chamber. The
chamber is equipped with porous stones at the top and bottom to facilitate even water
flow.

2. Setup: The water reservoir is filled with water, and the standpipe is connected to the
reservoir via a valve system. The standpipe is then attached to the soil specimen
chamber, allowing water to flow through the soil.

3. Constant head condition: The valve between the water reservoir and the standpipe is
adjusted to maintain a constant water level in the standpipe, creating a constant
hydraulic head or gradient across the soil specimen.

4. Measurement: The flow rate of water through the soil specimen is measured by
observing the change in water level in the standpipe over a specific period of time.
 The flow rate can be calculated using Darcy's law, which relates flow velocity,
hydraulic gradient, and permeability.

5. Calculation: The permeability of the soil specimen is calculated using Darcy's law,
which states that the flow rate (Q) is equal to the cross-sectional area (A) of the
specimen multiplied by the hydraulic gradient (i) and the permeability (k) of the soil:
Q = k * A * i.

Interpretation of Results: This test helps in understanding how easily water

can flow through a particular soil type, which is essential for designing drainage
systems and assessing seepage issues. The permeability value obtained from the constant
head permeameter test provides information about the ease with which water can flow
through the soil. Higher permeability indicates a more permeable soil, meaning it allows
water to pass through more easily. Lower permeability suggests a less permeable soil, where
water flow is restricted.

The interpretation of permeability values depends on the specific engineering application. For
example, in the design of drainage systems, a higher permeability is desirable to facilitate
water movement and prevent waterlogging. In contrast, for containment applications like
landfill liners, a lower permeability is preferred to minimize the leaching of contaminants.

Overall, the constant head permeameter test helps in assessing the hydraulic behaviour of soil
and provides valuable information for geotechnical engineers in designing and analysing
various civil engineering projects related to groundwater flow, drainage, and soil stability.

4.Variable Head Permeameter

Aim: The variable head permeameter test is used to determine the coefficient of
permeability for fine-grained soils like silts and clays.

Materials:
1. Variable head permeameter apparatus: It consists of a soil specimen chamber, a water
reservoir, a standpipe, a manometer, and a valve system to control water flow.
2. Soil specimen: A cylindrical soil sample of known dimensions and compacted to the
desired density.
Diagram:

Method:
1. Preparation: The soil specimen chamber is cleaned and assembled. The soil sample is
prepared by compacting it to the desired density and placing it in the chamber. The
chamber is equipped with porous stones at the top and bottom to facilitate even water
flow.

2. Setup: The water reservoir is filled with water, and the standpipe is connected to the
reservoir via a valve system. The standpipe is then attached to the soil specimen
chamber, allowing water to flow through the soil.

3. Variable head conditions: Initially, the valve between the water reservoir and the
standpipe is opened to allow water to flow freely through the soil. The water level in
the standpipe is recorded as the initial head (H1). The valve is then partially closed to
restrict the water flow, resulting in a decrease in the water level in the standpipe. The
new water level is recorded as the final head (H2). This creates a variable hydraulic
head or gradient across the soil specimen.

4. Measurement: The time required for the water level to drop from H1 to H2 is
measured. The flow rate of water through the soil specimen is calculated by dividing
 the volume of water (V) that has passed through the specimen by the time interval
(Δt).

5. Calculation: The permeability of the soil specimen is calculated using Darcy's law,
which relates flow velocity, hydraulic gradient, and permeability. In the variable head
permeameter test, the hydraulic gradient is determined by the difference in water
heads (H1 - H2), and the permeability can be calculated using the formula: k = (Q *
L) / (A * ΔH * Δt), where k is the permeability, Q is the flow rate, L is the length of
the specimen, A is the cross-sectional area of the specimen, ΔH is the difference in
water heads, and Δt is the time interval.

Interpretation of Results: This test provides valuable information on how

water flows through fine-grained soils, aiding in groundwater studies and seepage
control measures. The permeability value obtained from the variable head permeameter test
provides information about the soil's ability to transmit water under different hydraulic
gradients. It helps in understanding how the permeability of the soil changes as the hydraulic
head varies.

The interpretation of permeability values depends on the specific engineering application.

Higher permeability indicates a more permeable soil, meaning it allows water to pass through
more easily. Lower permeability suggests a less permeable soil, where water flow is
restricted.
The variable head permeability test allows engineers to assess how the soil's hydraulic
conductivity changes with varying hydraulic gradients. This information is crucial for
designing drainage systems, analysing slope stability, and understanding groundwater flow in
geotechnical and civil engineering projects.

5.Direct Shear Test

Aim: The direct shear test evaluates the shear strength parameters of soils under
different normal stresses.

Materials:
1. Direct shear apparatus: It consists of a shear box, a loading frame, a proving ring or load
cell, and a set of weights or a hydraulic system to apply vertical loads.
2. Soil specimen: A representative soil sample is collected and prepared to the desired density
and moisture content. The sample is trimmed to fit the dimensions of the shear box
Diagram:

Method:
1. Preparation: The shear box is cleaned and assembled, and the soil sample is trimmed
and placed in the shear box. The sample is carefully compacted to achieve the desired
density and moisture content, ensuring there are no air gaps or voids.

2. Setup: The shear box is placed in the loading frame, and a normal load is applied to
the soil sample either through weights or a hydraulic system. The normal load
simulates the vertical stress acting on the soil in the field.

3. Shearing: The shear box is horizontally divided into two halves, referred to as the
upper and lower boxes. A shear force is applied to the soil sample by moving the
upper box horizontally relative to the lower box at a specified rate. The force is
gradually increased until the soil specimen fails or reaches the desired displacement or
strain.

4. Measurement: During shearing, the applied shear force and the corresponding
horizontal displacement or strain are recorded. The proving ring or load cell measures
the shear force, while displacement is measured using displacement transducers or
dial gauges.

5. Calculation: The shear stress and shear strain are calculated based on the recorded
data. The shear stress is calculated by dividing the measured shear force by the cross-
sectional area of the soil sample. The shear strain is determined by dividing the
horizontal displacement by the initial height or width of the soil sample.
Interpretation of Results: The direct shear test provides important information about the
shear strength parameters of the soil sample. The shear strength parameters include cohesion
(c) and angle of internal friction (φ), which represent the shear resistance of the soil.

The interpretation of the test results involves plotting the shear stress versus shear strain or
displacement curve. The curve typically exhibits distinct phases: the initial elastic phase, the
plastic deformation phase, and the failure phase. The peak shear stress obtained during the
test corresponds to the maximum shear strength of the soil.

The interpretation of the test results helps in understanding the shear behaviour of the soil and
its response to different loading conditions. It assists in assessing slope stability, designing
foundations, analysing retaining walls, and evaluating the stability of earth structures.

Overall, the direct shear test is a widely used method for determining the shear strength
parameters of soils and provides valuable information for geotechnical engineers in designing
and analysing various civil engineering projects involving soil mechanics and foundation
engineering.

6.Unconfined Compression Test

Aim: The unconfined compression test assesses the undrained shear strength of
cohesive soils without confining pressure.

Materials:
1. Unconfined compression apparatus: It consists of a loading frame, a compression piston,
and a measuring device to record the applied load.
2. Soil specimen: A representative soil sample is collected and prepared to the desired density
and moisture content. The sample is typically cylindrical in shape, with known dimensions.

Diagram:
Method:
1. specimen are usually parallel and smooth to ensure even loading. The specimen is
weighed to determine its initial mass.

2. Setup: The 1. Preparation: The soil specimen is trimmed and prepared to the desired
dimensions. The ends of the soil specimen is placed on the lower platen of the loading
frame. The upper platen, attached to the compression piston, is lowered gently onto
the specimen without applying any load initially.

3. Loading: Axial compression is applied to the specimen by gradually increasing the

vertical displacement of the upper platen. This results in the application of a vertical
load on the soil specimen.

4. Measurement: During loading, the applied axial load and the corresponding axial
deformation or strain are recorded. The load is measured using a load cell or hydraulic
system, while deformation is measured using displacement transducers or dial gauges.

5. Failure: The test continues until the soil specimen fails, usually in the form of a
sudden drop in the load or a significant deformation.

6. Calculation: The peak compressive stress or the maximum axial load sustained by the
soil specimen is determined by dividing the maximum load by the cross-sectional area
 of the specimen. Additionally, the axial strain is calculated by dividing the axial
deformation by the initial height

Interpretation of Results: The unconfined compression test provides important information

regarding the compressive strength and stress-strain behaviour of the soil specimen. The test
results are typically presented as a stress-strain curve, plotting the axial stress (compressive
stress) against the axial strain.

The interpretation of the test results involves analysing the stress-strain curve and identifying
key parameters such as the peak stress, the ultimate stress, and the strain at failure. These
parameters help in determining the compressive strength, stiffness, and deformation
characteristics of the soil.

The test results and their interpretation are essential for evaluating the stability of soil slopes,
designing foundations, analysing retaining walls, and assessing the behaviour of soil under
different loading conditions.

Overall, the unconfined compression test is a widely used method for determining the
compressive strength and stress-strain properties of soils. It provides valuable information for
geotechnical engineers in designing and analysing various civil engineering projects
involving soil mechanics and foundation engineering.

7.Triaxial Test (No Pore Pressure and Volume

Change Measurement)
Aim: Triaxial tests without pore pressure measurement are conducted to determine
shear strength parameters under different stress conditions without considering pore
pressure effects.

Materials:
The test requires a cylindrical soil specimen, typically obtained from field samples or
compacted in the laboratory. The soil is carefully prepared, removing any large particles or
organic matter, and taking measures to maintain its natural moisture content during the
testing process

Diagram:
Method:
1. Specimen Preparation: The cylindrical soil specimen is trimmed to the desired size
and shape. The ends of the specimen are usually flattened and parallelized to ensure
proper load transmission during the test.
2. Saturation: The specimen is saturated with water to eliminate any air voids and ensure
full saturation.
3. Confining Pressure: The specimen is placed in a triaxial cell, which consists of a
cylindrical rubber membrane confining the soil. Confining pressure is applied to the
specimen uniformly through the rubber membrane.
4. Axial Load: The axial load is applied to the specimen at a constant rate. This load
induces shearing stresses within the soil specimen, causing it to deform.
5. Deformation and Observation: During the test, the axial load and corresponding axial
strain are continuously monitored. Additionally, the lateral strain is measured to
observe the deformation behaviour of the soil.
6. Failure: The test continues until the specimen reaches failure, which is usually
indicated by a significant drop in axial load or excessive deformation

Interpretation of Results: These tests provide critical data on how soils

respond to stress changes, essential for designing structures subject to varying loads
like dams or retaining walls. Based on the test, several important parameters can be
determined:
- Shear Strength: The peak and residual shear strengths can be obtained from the stress-strain
curves. These values represent the maximum resistance of the soil to shearing forces.
- Stress-Strain Behaviour: The stress-strain curves provide insights into the soil's stiffness,
compressibility, and overall behaviour under different stress levels.
- Failure Envelope: By plotting the shear stress against the normal effective stress, a failure
envelope can be established. This envelope represents the soil's shear strength characteristics
and is vital for stability analysis and design.

The results of the triaxial test, along with other geotechnical data, are used to assess the soil's
engineering properties and determine its suitability for various construction and infrastructure
projects

8.Compaction Test
Aim: Compaction tests evaluate the optimal moisture content and maximum dry
density achievable for a given soil type during compaction efforts
.
Materials:
The test is performed on a representative soil sample obtained from the field or prepared in
the laboratory. The soil sample should be free from any organic matter, large particles, and
debris. The sample is typically taken from different depths to ensure a representative
characterization of the soil's properties.

Diagram:
Method:
1. Sample Preparation: The soil sample is collected and brought to the laboratory. It is
then air-dried, crushed, and sieved to remove any large particles and ensure
uniformity.
2. Moisture-Density Relationship: A series of test specimens are prepared by combining
the soil sample with different moisture contents. This is achieved by adding water
incrementally and thoroughly mixing it with the soil until the desired moisture content
is attained.
3. Compaction: The test specimens are placed in a compaction mold in multiple layers.
Each layer is compacted using a specified number of blows from a compaction
hammer or a mechanical compactor. The compaction effort is usually standardized by
controlling the energy input or compaction method.
4. Determination of Dry Density: After compaction, the test specimens are carefully
removed from the mold. The mass and volume of each specimen are measured,
allowing for the calculation of its dry density.
5. Moisture Content Calculation: A portion of each compacted specimen is weighed and
dried in an oven to determine its moisture content. The moisture content is expressed
as a percentage of the dry mass of the soil.
6. Test Replication: The compaction test is repeated for different moisture contents,
typically in increments of around 2-3%, until a trend is established.
7. Optimum Moisture Content and Maximum Dry Density: The test results are plotted
on a graph with moisture content on the X-axis and dry density on the Y-axis. The
curve obtained from these values allows for the determination of the optimum
moisture content and maximum dry density.

Interpretation of Results: These tests help in determining the best moisture

content for achieving maximum compaction density, crucial for road construction and
earthworks projects. The compaction test provides several important results and
interpretations:
- Optimum Moisture Content (OMC): This is the moisture content at which the soil achieves
maximum compaction and the highest dry density. It represents the ideal moisture content for
compacting the soil to ensure stability and minimize settlement.
- Maximum Dry Density (MDD): MDD is the highest dry density achieved by compacting
the soil at the optimum moisture content. It indicates the level of compaction that can be
attained for a given soil.
- Moisture-Density Relationship: The relationship between moisture content and dry density
allows engineers to determine the compaction characteristics of the soil. It helps in selecting
appropriate compaction methods and predicting the behaviour of the soil under load.

The compaction test results are utilized in construction projects to guide earthwork
operations, such as embankment construction, roadbed preparation, and foundation design.
They aid in determining the compaction specifications, ensuring the stability and
performance of the soil in the field.
9.Standard and Modified Compaction Tests
1. Standard compaction test

Aim: The aim of the standard compaction test is to determine the maximum dry density and
optimum moisture content of a soil specimen under standard compaction effort. This test
helps in evaluating the soil's compaction properties for a wide range of construction
applications.

Material: The test requires a representative soil sample obtained from the field or prepared in
the laboratory. The sample should be free from large particles, organic matter, and debris.
The soil sample is typically taken from different depths to ensure a comprehensive
characterization of the soil's properties.

Diagram:
Method:
1. Sample Preparation: The soil sample is collected and brought to the laboratory. It is
air-dried, crushed, and sieved to remove any large particles and ensure uniformity.
2. Moisture-Density Relationship: A series of test specimens are prepared by mixing the
soil sample with different moisture contents. Water is added incrementally and
thoroughly mixed with the soil until the desired moisture content is achieved.
3. Compaction: The test specimens are placed in a cylindrical compaction mold in
multiple layers. Each layer is compacted using a specified number of blows from a
compaction hammer, typically falling freely from a specific height. The compaction
effort is standardized by controlling the energy input during compaction.
4. Determination of Dry Density: After compaction, the test specimens are carefully
removed from the mold. Their mass and volume are measured to calculate the dry
density.
5. Moisture Content Calculation: A portion of each compacted specimen is weighed and
dried in an oven to determine its moisture content.
6. Test Replication: The standard compaction test is repeated for different moisture
contents, typically in increments of around 2-3%, until a trend is established.
7. Optimum Moisture Content and Maximum Dry Density: The test results are plotted
on a graph with moisture content on the X-axis and dry density on the Y-axis. The
curve obtained from these values allows for the determination of the optimum
moisture content and maximum dry density.

Results/Interpretation:
The standard compaction test provides important results and interpretations:
- Optimum Moisture Content (OMC): This is the moisture content at which the soil achieves
maximum compaction and the highest dry density. It represents the ideal moisture content for
compacting the soil to ensure stability and minimize settlement.
- Maximum Dry Density (MDD): MDD is the highest dry density achieved by compacting
the soil at the optimum moisture content. It indicates the level of compaction that can be
attained for a given soil.
- Moisture-Density Relationship: The relationship between moisture content and dry density
helps engineers understand the compaction characteristics of the soil, aiding in selecting
appropriate compaction methods and predicting the behaviour of the soil under load.

2. Modified Compaction Test:

Aim:
The aim of the modified compaction test is similar to the standard compaction test, but it
involves a higher compaction effort. This test is primarily used for soils that are less
susceptible to compaction, such as clayey soils, and helps to assess their compaction
properties under more rigorous conditions.

Materials:
The material and sample preparation for the modified compaction test are the same as the
standard compaction test. The primary difference lies in the compaction effort applied during
the test.

Diagram:
Method:
1. Compaction: In the modified compaction test, the compaction effort is increased by
using heavier compaction equipment or applying higher energy inputs during
compaction.
2. Determination of Dry Density and Moisture Content: The process of determining the
dry density and moisture content remains the same as in the standard compaction test.

Results/Interpretation:
The results and interpretations obtained from the modified compaction test are similar to
those of the standard compaction test. The test provides the optimum moisture content and
maximum dry density, allowing engineers to understand the compaction characteristics and
behaviour of the soil under more intense compaction efforts.

Both the standard and modified compaction tests help in determining the proper moisture
content and compaction effort required to achieve the desired level of compaction for a given
soil. These tests are essential for ensuring the stability, load-bearing capacity, and
performance of soils in various construction applications.

10.Cone Penetration Tests (CPT)

Cone penetration tests assess subsurface soil properties by measuring cone resistance
as it penetrates into the ground at a constant rate under controlled conditions.
The results help in characterizing soil layers, determining bearing capacity, and
assessing liquefaction potential during seismic events based on cone resistance values
at various depths.

Aim:
The aim of the cone penetration test is to obtain information about the soil's stratification,
strength, and compressibility at various depths. This information is crucial for geotechnical
engineers in designing foundations, assessing soil stability, and evaluating the suitability of
the site for construction.

Material:
The CPT requires a cone penetrometer, which consists of a steel cone attached to a series of
rods, connected to a pushing mechanism. The cone typically has a standardized shape and
size, with a known cross-sectional area. The penetrometer is driven into the ground using
hydraulic or mechanical force.
Diagram:

Method:
1. Site Preparation: The test site is prepared by clearing any obstructions and ensuring
accessibility for the CPT equipment.
2. Cone Penetration: The cone penetrometer is pushed into the ground at a constant rate,
typically ranging from 1 to 20 cm/s. The pushing force required to advance the cone is
continuously measured and recorded.
3. Measurement Parameters: Various parameters are measured during the test, including
the cone resistance (qc), which is the force required to penetrate the soil, and the
sleeve friction (fs), which is the frictional resistance encountered between the
penetrometer rods and the soil.
4. Depth Measurement: The depth of penetration is continuously monitored and
recorded as the test progresses.
5. Test Completion: The cone penetration test is typically conducted to a predetermined
depth or until it becomes impractical to continue due to site-specific conditions (e.g.,
refusal or excessive penetration resistance).
6. Data Interpretation: The recorded data, including the cone resistance and sleeve
friction, are analysed to determine the soil stratification, strength, and other
geotechnical parameters.

Results/Interpretation:
The cone penetration test provides valuable results and interpretations:
- Soil Stratification: The measured cone resistance and sleeve friction profiles help in
identifying different soil layers and their boundaries, providing information about the soil
stratification at the site.
- Soil Classification: The cone resistance and sleeve friction values can be used to classify the
soil according to recognized soil classification systems (e.g., the soil behaviour type index).
- Shear Strength: The cone resistance is often correlated with the undrained shear strength of
cohesive soils, providing an indication of their strength characteristics.
- Soil Compressibility: The cone penetration test data can be used to estimate soil
compressibility parameters, such as the reconsolidation pressure and coefficient of
consolidation, which are essential for settlement analysis.
- Soil Liquefaction Potential: The cone penetration test results can be utilized to assess the
liquefaction susceptibility of loose, saturated sandy soils.

The interpretation of the cone penetration test results requires expertise in geotechnical
engineering. The data obtained from the test is typically used to inform foundation design,
slope stability analysis, and other geotechnical assessments related to construction projects.

11.CBR Tests (California Bearing Ratio)

CBR tests evaluate subgrade strength by comparing pavement support capabilities
between a standard material (crushed stone) and compacted subgrade material under
controlled conditions.
The results provide insights into subgrade quality, aiding in pavement design
decisions by determining load-bearing capacities relative to standard materials like
crushed stone.

Aim:
The aim of the CBR test is to determine the relative strength of a soil or base material by
comparing its resistance to penetration with that of a standard crushed rock material. The test
provides a measure of the soil's load-bearing capacity, allowing engineers to assess its
suitability for road construction and design appropriate pavement structures.

Material:
The CBR test requires a representative soil sample obtained from the field or prepared in the
laboratory. The sample should be free from large particles, organic matter, and debris. The
soil sample is typically taken from different depths to ensure a comprehensive
characterization of the soil's properties.
Diagram:

Method:
1. Sample Preparation: The soil sample is collected and brought to the laboratory. It is
air-dried, crushed, and sieved to remove any large particles and ensure uniformity.
2. Specimen Preparation: The soil sample is mixed with water to achieve a desired
moisture content. It is then compacted into a cylindrical mould at specified
compaction energy levels, typically using a mechanical compactor. The compacted
specimen is allowed to cure for a specific period.
3. Penetration Test: The compacted specimen is placed in a CBR testing machine. A
plunger with a standardized area is pushed into the specimen at a constant rate and
load. The penetration resistance, measured in terms of the depth of penetration, is
recorded.
 4. Load Application: The load is gradually increased on the plunger until a specified
penetration value is reached, typically 2.5 mm or 5.0 mm.
5. Calculation: The CBR value is calculated as the ratio of the penetration resistance of
the soil specimen to the penetration resistance of a standard crushed rock material,
multiplied by 100. This ratio is determined at the specified penetration value.
6. Test Replication: The CBR test is typically conducted on multiple specimens to
ensure consistency and reliability of the results.

Results/Interpretation:
The CBR test provides important results and interpretations:
- CBR Value: The CBR value represents the relative strength of the soil or base material. It
indicates how much load the material can withstand compared to the standard crushed rock
material. Higher CBR values indicate stronger and more load-resistant materials.
- Pavement Design: The CBR value is used in pavement design calculations to determine the
appropriate thickness of the pavement layers. It helps engineers select suitable materials and
design pavement structures that can safely carry expected traffic loads.
- Soil Classification: CBR values are often used to classify soils into different categories,
such as subgrade soils, base materials, and subbase materials. These classifications provide
guidance for construction specifications and quality control.
- Interpretation of Results: The CBR test results can be interpreted in conjunction with other
geotechnical parameters to assess the behaviour and performance of the soil or base material
under different loading conditions.

The CBR test is an essential tool in pavement design and construction, allowing engineers to
evaluate the strength and load-bearing capacity of soils and base materials. The results of the
CBR test aid in making informed decisions regarding pavement design, material selection,
and construction practices.

12.Determination of Specific Gravity

Specific gravity tests measure the ratio between the mass of a given volume of soil
solids compared to an equal volume of water, providing insights into soil composition
and void ratios important for geotechnical analyses like settlement calculations or
particle size distribution assessments.

Aim:

The aim of the specific gravity test is to determine the specific gravity of a material, which
provides information about its density and relative heaviness compared to water. This
information is valuable for evaluating the suitability of materials for construction purposes,
such as in concrete, asphalt, and soil stabilization.
Material:

The specific gravity test can be performed on different materials, including soil, aggregates,
and minerals. The material should be clean, free from organic matter, and representative of
the sample being tested.

Diagram:

Method:

1. Sample Preparation: The material sample is collected and brought to the laboratory. It
is air-dried, crushed, and sieved to obtain a representative fraction of particles within
a specific size range, depending on the material being tested.
2. Oven Drying: The sample is dried in an oven at a specified temperature to remove any
moisture content. The drying temperature and duration depend on the material being
tested.
3. Density Bottle: A density bottle, also known as a pycnometer, is cleaned and dried
before use. Its empty weight (W1) is measured and recorded.
4. Sample Placement: The dried and cooled sample is carefully placed into the density
bottle until it is approximately two-thirds full. The weight of the bottle with the
sample (W2) is measured and recorded.
5. Distilled Water: Distilled water is poured into the density bottle until it is completely
filled. The weight of the bottle with the water (W3) is measured and recorded.
6. Calculation: The specific gravity is calculated using the following formula:
1. Specific Gravity = (W2 - W1) / (W3 - W1)
2. where W1 is the empty weight of the density bottle, W2 is the weight of the bottle
with the sample, and W3 is the weight of the bottle with water.
 7. Test Replication: The specific gravity test is typically performed in duplicate or
triplicate to ensure accuracy and reliability of the results.

Results/Interpretation:

The specific gravity test provides important results and interpretations:

- Specific Gravity: The specific gravity value represents the ratio of the density of the
material to the density of water. It indicates how dense or heavy the material is compared to
water. Specific gravity values range from less than 1 (lighter than water) to greater than 1
(heavier than water).

- Material Quality: Specific gravity values can help assess the quality and suitability of
materials for construction applications. For example, in the case of aggregates, a higher
specific gravity often indicates higher strength and durability.

- Material Classification: Specific gravity values are used to classify materials into different
categories, such as lightweight aggregates, normal-weight aggregates, and heavyweight
aggregates. These classifications provide guidance for material selection and design
considerations.

- Interpretation of Results: The specific gravity results can be compared with established
standards or specifications to determine if the material meets the required criteria for a
particular application.

The determination of specific gravity is a fundamental test in materials testing, providing

valuable information about the density and quality of materials. The results of the test aid in
material selection, quality control, and performance evaluation in various construction and
engineering projects.
References:
1)American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)
2)American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO)
3)Geotechnical Engineering: Principles & Practices by Donald P. Coduto et al.
These sources were instrumental in providing accurate and detailed information on
geotechnical laboratory testing methods and their interpretations based on industry
standards and best practices.