‭ he graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals‬

T
‭during 2014.‬
‭Average monthly change in prices of copper, nickel and zinc (2014)‬

‭ he line graph reveals information on the average monthly change in the expenditure of three‬
T
‭different metals in 2014. Units are measured in percent (%).‬

‭ rom an overall perspective, there was‬‭a downward trend in the figure for the change‬
F
‭among three chosen metals‬‭Copper, Nickel and Zinc during 2014. In January, the figure for‬
‭average monthly change in prices of Nickel appeared to be by far the largest one, with just 6%,‬
‭whereas the corresponding figures for Zinc and Copper were found to be approximately 2% and‬
‭about 1%, respectively.‬

‭ emarkably, Nickel‬‭witnessed a substantial decrease in monthly expenditure‬‭throughout‬

R
‭the year 2014,‬‭reaching its lowest point of 1%‬‭in December - a huge decline of about 6 times.‬
‭Nevertheless, the figure for the monthly change in price of Zinc experienced a slight decrease‬
‭from 1% in January to just over -1% in June,‬‭before rising to almost 2% in December‬‭, being the‬
‭highest among the three metals‬‭.‬

I‭t is interesting to note that‬‭Copper's figures fluctuated between‬‭-0.5% and 2% throughout the‬
‭year, ending at nearly 2% in December‬‭. In comparison‬‭with the lowest group, the figure recorded‬
‭for Nicker ranged from -3% to 1% from March to December,‬‭stabilizing at 1%‬‭at the end of the‬
‭year.‬
‭ he chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual‬
T
‭income in 2007, 2011 and 2015.‬

‭ he chart reveals information on the number of US households by annual income in three‬

T
‭different years, 2007, 2011 and 2015. Units are measured in millions of households.‬

‭ rom an overall perspective, there was a significant difference in the amount of money spent on‬
F
‭households among three chosen years. Actually, the figure given for households that cost‬
‭$100,000 or more appeared to be by far the largest one‬‭which was followed by the‬
‭corresponding figure of $25,000-$49,999 households and those of less than $25,000‬‭.‬
‭Nevertheless, the figure recorded for households that cost $75,000-$99,999 was observed to be‬
‭the lowest one.‬

‭ urprisingly, the number of households that cost $100,000 or more in 2011 witnessed a‬
S
‭considerable decrease in 2011, with about 25 MH,‬‭being lower that that of $25,000-$49,999‬
‭households and households that cost less than $25,000.‬‭In fact, these figures were found to‬
‭be just under 30 MH and about 28 MH, respectively.‬

I‭t is interesting to note that the figure recorded for $50,000-$74,999 households‬‭remained the‬
‭same with just 20 MH throughout 2007-2015‬‭. In terms of the remaining group, households‬
‭that cost $75,000-$99,999 experienced a fluctuation around 15 MH in the whole period, being‬
‭the lowest one‬‭among five different costs of US households by annual income.‬
‭ he graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four‬
T
‭Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020, with predictions for 2030 and‬
‭2040‬

‭ he line graph reveals information on the population rate among four chosen Asian countries‬
T
‭living in cities in 1970-2020, with predictions for 2030 and 2040. Units are measured in percent‬
‭(%).‬

‭ rom an overall perspective,‬‭it is predicted that there will be a significant increase‬‭in the‬
F
‭percentage of population in Philippines, Malaysia, Thailand, and Indonesia. By the year 1970,‬
‭the figure given for city dwellers in the Philippines appeared to be by far the largest one, with‬
‭approximately 31% which was followed by that of Malaysia and Thailand, with 30% and just‬
‭under 20%,respectively. Nevertheless, the figure observed for city population in Indonesia was‬
‭found to be the lowest one, with only about 14%.‬

‭ urprisingly, the figure recorded for population living in urban areas in Indonesia‬‭stood at the‬
S
‭lowest one in the year 1970, then a dramatic growth in this figure is foreseen after 70‬
‭years‬‭, to 60% by 2040 - a huge growth of almost 5 times. Conversely, the corresponding figure‬
‭of inhabitants living in cities in the Philippines‬‭is expected to decrease slightly‬‭from 1990 to‬
‭2010, and then will experience a slight increase in 2010-2040.‬

I‭t is interesting to note that the urban population in Thailand‬‭is foreseen to rise considerably‬
‭across 1970-2040‬‭, going up to about 20% after 70 years. In comparison with the remaining‬
‭group, the figure given for city dwellers in Malaysia rose significantly in the first 50 years, then‬
‭predicted to keep going and stay at almost 80%, being the city that has the highest city‬
‭population.‬
‭ he bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in‬
T
‭different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.‬

‭ he bar chart reveals information on the percentage of Australian men and women doing‬
T
‭regular physical activity in 2010. Units are measured in percent (%).‬

‭ rom an overall perspective, there was a significant difference in the percentage of Australian‬
F
‭male and female in different age groups doing regular exercise in 2010.‬‭In terms of women‬‭,‬
‭the figure given for population aged 45-54 appeared to be by far the largest one, with 53.3%,‬
‭which was‬‭followed by that of those aged 35-44 and 55-64‬‭. Actually, these figures were found‬
‭to be 52.5% and 53%, in that order.‬

‭ urprisingly, the population aged 15-24‬‭seemed to be an age group having the highest rate‬
S
‭of doing regular exercise for Australian men‬‭, with 52.8%, followed by the corresponding‬
‭figure of those aged 65+ and 55-64, respectively. Nevertheless, the lowest percentage of male‬
‭doing regular physical activity was found to be on population aged 35-44, while the‬
‭corresponding figure of women was observed to be on those aged 65+, with 47.1%.‬

I‭t is interesting to note that all the remaining figures for Australian men and women ranged from‬
‭42.2% to 47.7%.‬‭Overall, the percentage of Australian women doing regular exercise was‬
‭significantly higher than that of men in the vast majority of age groups‬‭, excepting for‬
‭people aged 15-24. and 65+.‬
‭ he bar chart provides information about how often people in the USA spent ate fast‬
T
‭food from 2003 to 2013.‬

‭ he bar chart reveals information on the frequency of American people eating fast food going to‬
T
‭fast food restaurants in three selected years 2003, 2006 and 2013. Units are measured in‬
‭percent (%).‬

‭ rom an overall perspective, there was a significant difference in‬‭the frequency of people‬
F
‭consuming fast food in the USA‬‭between 2003 and 2013. Actually, the figure given for‬
‭American people going to fast food restaurants Once a week and Once or twice a month‬
‭appeared to be by far the largest one, with over 25%, whereas the corresponding figure for‬
‭people Never eating fast food and people consuming fast food Everyday was found to be the‬
‭lowest, with under 5%.‬

‭ urprisingly, the figure observed for people eating fast food Once a week was recorded to be‬
S
‭the highest in 2003 and 2006, with approximately 32% and nearly 34%, respectively, excepting‬
‭for the year 2013. In 2013, the highest percentage was found to be on people eating fast food‬
‭Once or twice a month, with almost 33%.‬

I‭t is interesting to note that the frequency of people consuming fast food Several times a week‬
‭and A few times a year ranged from roughly 13% to almost 20%. In comparison with the lowest‬
‭group, the percentage of people eating fast food Every day and Never eating fast food was‬
‭found to be around 2.5% and just under 5%.‬
‭ he charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of‬
T
‭nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.‬

‭ he three pie charts reveal information on the average percentage of three types of unhealthy‬
T
‭nutrients‬‭- sodium, saturated fats, and added sugars -‬ ‭consumed by typical American meals.‬
‭Units are measured in percent (%).‬

‭ rom an overall perspective, there is a significant difference in‬‭the consumption of these‬

F
‭nutrients across different meal times‬‭. Actually, the figure given for‬‭sodium intake during‬
‭dinner‬‭accounted for by far the largest one, with 43%, which was followed by that of‬‭added‬
‭sugar consumed in snacks and saturated fat consumed in dinner‬‭, with 42% and 37%,‬
‭respectively. Nevertheless, the figure recorded for sodium intake during breakfast and snacks‬
‭was found to be the lowest, at just 14%.‬

‭ urprisingly‬‭,‬‭the highest consumption of unhealthy nutrients is observed to be at dinner‬‭,‬

S
‭with sodium at 43% and saturated fats at 37%,‬‭excluding added sugars‬‭. In fact, t‬‭he‬
‭percentage of Americans consuming added sugars‬‭in snacks accounted for 42%,‬‭being‬
‭significantly higher than that of other nutrients intake levels.‬

I‭t is interesting to note that the remaining figures of unhealthy nutrients eaten in lunch range‬
‭from 19% to 29%. In comparison with the lowest group, the rate of Americans consuming‬
‭sodium, saturated fat and added sugars in breakfast was found to be at around 14% and 16%.‬
‭ he chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories‬
T
‭during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category‬
‭of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.‬

‭ he bar chart reveals information on the value of one country’s exports in the five selected‬
T
‭categories in 2015 and 2016, while the table represents the percentage change in exports of‬
‭every single sector in 2016 and 2015.‬

I‭t is clear from the bar chart that the figure for Petroleum products appeared to be by far the‬
‭largest one among the six chosen categories of exports in 2015 and 2016, with approximately‬
‭$60 billion and nearly $62 billion, respectively. Nevertheless, the corresponding figure for‬
‭Textiles was found to be the lowest one in 2015 and 2016, with about $27 billion and nearly $31‬
‭billion, in that order.‬

‭ emarkably,‬‭the second highest figure of export earnings was determined to be on‬

R
‭Engineering goods, with about $57 billion in 2015 and just over $60 billion in 2016. In terms of‬
‭the two remaining categories, Gems and jewelry and Agricultural products,‬‭all figures stood at‬
‭the middle level‬‭, ranging from about $30 billion to roughly $42 billion.‬

‭ urning into the table, the percentage change for Textiles was observed to be the highest‬
T
‭between 2015 and 2016, with a huge growth of 15.24%. Conversely, the figure for Petroleum‬
‭products‬‭increased slightly by 3% during the two years 2015-2016‬‭, while that of Engineering‬
‭goods rose dramatically by 8.5%.‬‭With respect to‬‭the Agricultural products and Gems and‬
‭jewelry, the figure for Agricultural products‬‭went up only 0.81%‬‭, whereas‬‭the percentage‬
‭change for Gems and jewelry decreased moderately by 5.18%.‬
‭ he chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented‬
T
‭accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.‬

‭ he chart reveals information on the rate of households owning and renting accommodation in‬
T
‭England and Wales in 1918-2011. Units are measured in percent (%).‬

‭ rom an overall perspective, there was‬‭a significant upward trend in the percentage of‬
F
‭those owning households‬‭, while‬‭the proportion of renting properties decreased‬
‭substantially during this time frame‬‭. Actually, the figure given for‬‭households in England‬
‭and Wales living in rented accommodation‬‭appeared to be by far the largest one, with‬
‭approximately 80% in 1918. Nevertheless, all the remaining figures of households living in their‬
‭own homes‬‭ranged from just over 20% to about 40% across 1918-1961, being significantly‬
‭lower than that of their counterparts.‬

‭ urprisingly, the percentage of households renting accommodation‬‭witnessed a significant fall‬

S
‭from nearly 80% in 1918 to almost 31% in 2001,‬‭before rising to almost 37% by the final‬
‭year‬‭. Conversely, the figure recorded fo‬‭r households in owned accommodation increased‬
‭dramatically‬‭from just over 20% in 1918 to roughly 65% in 2001.‬

I‭t is interesting to note that the figure observed for both households living in their own houses‬
‭and those living in rented properties was found to be about 50% in the year 1971,‬‭then an‬
‭opposite tendency appeared among these two types of accommodation in the following‬
‭years‬‭. In fact,‬‭home ownership continued its rising trend to reach a peak of close to 70%‬
‭in 2001, then declined slightly by roughly 5% in 2011.‬
‭ he bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and‬
T
‭consumption of electricity in 2014.‬
‭Summarise‬ ‭the‬ ‭information‬ ‭by‬ ‭selecting‬ ‭and‬ ‭reporting‬ ‭the‬ ‭main‬ ‭features,‬ ‭and‬
‭make comparisons were relevant.‬

‭ he bar chart reveals information on the ten selected countries‬‭with the highest production‬
T
‭and consumption of electricity‬‭in 2014. Units are measured in billion kWh.‬

‭ rom an overall perspective, there was a significant difference in the amount of electricity‬
F
‭production and consumption among ten chosen countries, namely China, the United States,‬
‭Russia, Japan, India, Canada, France, Brazil, Germany and Korea, Rep. in the year 2014.‬
‭Actually, the figures for‬‭electricity production and consumption in China‬‭appeared to be by‬
‭far the largest one, with 5,398 billion kWh and 5,322 billion kWh, respectively. Nevertheless, the‬
‭corresponding figures for‬‭the Republic of Korea was found to be the lowest one‬‭, with 485.1‬
‭billion kWh and 449.5 billion kWh, in that order.‬

‭ emarkably,‬‭the second-highest levels of electricity production and consumption‬‭was‬

R
‭observed to be in the United States, with 4,099 billion kWh in electric production and 3,866‬
‭billion kWh in consumption. In terms of the remaining countries,‬‭all figures ranged from the‬
‭middle‬‭, ranging from 526.6 billion kWh to 1.057 billion kWh.‬

I‭t is interesting to note that the figure for electricity production was slightly higher than‬‭the‬
‭majority of their counterparts in most countries‬‭, excepting for Germany. In fact, the‬‭amount‬
‭of‬‭electricity produced in this country was found to be 526.6 billion kWh in 2014, being‬
‭significantly lower than the consumption of electricity.‬
‭ he graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean‬
T
‭island between 2010 and 2017.‬

‭ he line graph reveals information on the number of tourists traveling a Caribbean island from‬
T
‭2010 to 2017. Units are measured in millions of visitors.‬

‭ rom an overall perspective, there was an upward trend in the figure for visitors staying on‬
F
‭cruise ships and those staying on island in 2010-2017, including the total number of visitors. By‬
‭the year 2010, the figure recorded for the total number of tourists visiting a Caribbean island‬
‭was only 1 million visitors (MV)‬‭, followed by the corresponding figures of those staying on‬
‭cruise ships and those staying on the island, with almost 0.25 MV and approximately 0.75 MV,‬
‭respectively. In fact, these figures‬‭seemed to be significantly low before experiencing a‬
‭significant increase in the following years.‬

‭ urprisingly, the figure for tourists choosing to stay on the island was considerably higher than‬
S
‭those choosing cruise ships in the starting year 2010, with roughly 0.75 MV. However, the‬
‭number of tourists staying on boats‬‭witnessed a remarkable growth‬‭from almost 0.25 MV in‬
‭2010 to about 2 MV in 2017‬‭,‬‭marking an eightfold increase compared to the initial year.‬

I‭t is interesting to note that the number of visitors staying on the island‬‭ranged from‬
‭approximately 0.75 to roughly 1.5 MV during the period 2011-2015 before‬‭experiencing a‬
‭moderate decline‬‭to nearly 1.25 million visitors‬‭in 2016.‬‭Nevertheless,this figure‬‭saw a‬
‭significant rise‬‭by the end of the period,‬‭reaching approximately 1.5 MV in 2017.‬
‭ he chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and‬
T
‭tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.‬

‭ he chart reveals information on the consumption of coffee and tea by Australian people in five‬
T
‭selected cities. Units are measured in percent (%).‬

‭ rom an overall perspective, there was a significant difference‬‭in the buying and drinking‬
F
‭habits of coffee and tea of city dwellers‬‭in Australia in the last 4 weeks. Notably, the‬
‭proportion of‬‭urban residents‬‭visiting cafes for coffee or tea in Melbourne and Hobart appeared‬
‭to be by far the largest one, with approximately 64%, followed by the corresponding figures of‬
‭people in Sydney and Brisbane. These figures were approximately 62% and 56%, respectively.‬

‭ urprisingly,‬‭the proportion of urban residents purchasing fresh coffee‬‭over the past four‬
S
‭weeks was determined to be the lowest one among five chosen cities,‬‭ranging from around‬
‭34% to about 44%‬‭. Nevertheless, the percentage of‬‭individuals opting to visit a cafe for‬
‭coffee or tea was observed to be the highest in most urban areas‬‭, excepting for Adelaide.‬
‭Notably,‬‭the rate of instant coffee purchases in Adelaide exceeded the number of‬
‭individuals visiting cafes for coffee or tea in the same period.‬

I‭t is interesting to note that the proportion of urban residents‬‭consuming instant coffee varied‬
‭significantly over the past four weeks, ranging at around 45% and 55%‬‭. In comparison with‬
‭the lowest group, the figure for the consumption of fresh coffee by city dwellers in Brisbane and‬
‭Adelaide was found to be the lowest one, with just under 35%.‬
‭ he chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after‬
T
‭finishing their undergraduate degree course. The table shows the salaries of the‬
‭anthropologists in work after five years.‬

‭ he pie chart reveals information on the destination of Anthropology graduates after completing‬
T
‭their undergraduate program, while the table represents the income of Anthropologists after five‬
‭years of working. Units are measured in percent (%).‬

I‭t is clear from the pie chart that the percentage of anthropology graduates working full-time‬
‭accounted for by far the largest one, with 52% which was followed by the corresponding figures‬
‭for‬‭their counterparts working part-time and those being unemployed‬‭, with 15% and 12%,‬
‭respectively. Nevertheless, the figure for those‬‭working full-time and studying postgraduate‬
‭simultaneously‬‭was found to be the lowest one, with 5%. In terms of the two remaining groups,‬
‭the proportion of those studying full-time and those being unknown for their current situations‬
‭constituted 8%‬‭.‬

‭ urning into the table, 80% of anthropologists working as freelance consultants earned more‬
T
‭than $75,000 after 5 years of work, whereas‬‭only 5% of those received between $25,000 and‬
‭$49,999.‬‭With respect to the government sector‬‭, 50% of anthropology graduates earned‬
‭more than $100,000 after five years of working,‬‭while 20% of their counterparts got between‬
‭$25,000 and $74,999.‬‭For anthropologists working at private companies, 30% of those earned‬
‭more than $100,000 after 5 years, whilst 35% of anthropologists working in this sector received‬
‭between $50,000 and $74,000.‬
‭ he charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in‬
T
‭six areas of the world.‬

‭ he six pie charts reveal information on the proportion of water used for three selected‬
T
‭purposes (Agricultural Use, Domestic Use and Industrial Use) in six locations worldwide. Units‬
‭are measured in percent (%).‬

‭ rom an overall perspective, there was a significant difference in the percentage of water usage‬
F
‭for Agriculture, Industry and Domestic. Actually, the figure given for Agriculture accounted for‬
‭the largest one‬‭among three chosen purposes of water in the vast majority of areas in the‬
‭world,‬‭with over 70%, excepting for North America and Europe. These figures‬‭comprised of‬
‭39% and 32%, respectively.‬

I‭t is interesting to note that the rate of water used for Industry‬‭made up the highest one in‬
‭North America‬‭, with 48% and in Europe, with 53%,‬‭whereas the remaining figures‬‭for‬
‭Industrial Use‬‭ranged from 5% to 12% within the four rest areas in the world‬‭. In terms of‬
‭water used for Domestic,‬‭the highest percentage for this sector was found to be on‬‭South‬
‭America and Europe, with 19% and 15%, in that order. Overall, Agriculture‬‭appeared to be a‬
‭sector using the largest percentage of water‬‭in South America, Africa, Central Asia and‬
‭SouthEast Asia, with 71%, 84%, 88% and 81%, respectively.‬
‭ he charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in‬
T
‭England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000‬
‭and 2010.‬

‭ he two pie charts reveal information on the percentage of British undergraduates at one‬
T
‭university in England‬‭who spoke other languages in addition to English‬‭during 2000 and‬
‭2010. Units are measured in percent (%).‬

‭ rom an overall perspective, there was a significant difference in the rate of British students who‬
F
‭were able to speak languages‬‭other than their mother tongue - English in two distinct‬
‭years 2000 and 2010‬‭. By the year 2000, the figure for those speaking Spanish only accounted‬
‭for the largest one, with 30%, which was followed by the corresponding figure of those who do‬
‭not speak another language, with 20%. Nevertheless, the remaining figures‬‭ranged from 10%‬
‭to 15%, including students who were able to speak either French, German, or Another‬
‭language and those who were bilingual.‬

I‭t is interesting to note that the proportion of undergraduates speaking Spanish rose‬
‭considerably by 5%,‬‭stabilizing at the highest one throughout the time frame‬‭, with 35% in‬
‭2010, which was followed by that of those who had the ability to speak another language and‬
‭those who were bilingual, with 20% and 15%, respectively. However, the figure recorded for‬
‭students who cannot speak other languages and those speaking French only witnessed a slight‬
‭decrease between 2000 and 2010,‬‭both constituting 10%‬‭.‬‭In terms of the remaining‬
‭categories‬‭, the proportion of undergraduates who speak French only‬‭remained the same,‬
‭accounting for only 10% in both 2000 and 2010.‬
‭ he graph below shows average carbon dioxide (Co2) emissions per person‬
T
‭in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.‬

‭ he bar chart illustrates information on the average CO2 emissions per person in five selected‬
T
‭European countries (United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal). Units are measured in‬
‭metric tonnes.‬

‭ rom an overall perspective, there was‬‭a moderate increase‬‭in the amount of carbon dioxide‬
F
‭emissions per person in Italy and Portugal,‬‭while the opposite trend was observed for‬‭the‬
‭United Kingdom and Sweden. By the year 1967, the figure given for average CO2 emissions‬
‭per person in the United Kingdom appeared to be by far the largest one, with approximately 14‬
‭metric tonnes (MT), which was followed by that of Sweden and Italy. Notably, these figures were‬
‭found to be about 8 MT and roughly 1.2 MT, respectively.‬

‭ urprisingly, the figure recorded for average CO2 emissions per person in Sweden‬‭witnessed a‬
S
‭significant decrease from nearly 9 MT in 1967 to around 5.2 MT in 2007‬‭- a huge drop of‬
‭almost 2 times. In fact,‬‭the rate of CO2 emissions produced by each person‬‭in Portugal and‬
‭Sweden was found to be the lowest in 2007, with around 5.2 MT. However, the average amount‬
‭of‬‭CO2 emissions per capita in Portugal rose steadily‬‭over the period 1967-2007.‬

I‭t is interesting to note that the figure for CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom‬
‭decreased moderately to just under 9 MT‬‭by the year 2007,‬‭but remained the highest‬
‭among the five selected countries‬‭. Nevertheless, there was‬‭a moderate rise‬‭in the figure for‬
‭Italy,‬‭reaching the second highest at‬‭approximately 7.9 MT in 2007.‬
‭ he table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the‬
T
‭year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of‬
‭surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same‬
‭two periods.‬

‭ he table illustrates the total number of visitors to Ashdown Museum, while the two pie charts‬
T
‭reveal information on the levels of visitors' satisfaction. Units are measured in numbers of‬
‭visitors.‬

I‭t is clear from the table that there was a significant increase in the number of visitors after the‬
‭refurbishment of the museum. In fact, the total number of people visiting during the year before‬
‭refurbishment was 74,000 visitors. After refurbishing,‬‭the visitor numbers at Ashdown‬
‭Museum increased by 18,000.‬

‭ urning into the two pie charts, the figure recorded for visitors who were dissatisfied with the‬
T
‭experience in the museum before refurbishment appeared to be by far the largest one, with 40‬
‭visitors, which was‬‭followed by that of those who felt satisfied and those who were very‬
‭satisfied‬‭. These figures were found to be 30 visitors and 15 visitors, respectively. Nevertheless,‬
‭the survey results indicated that‬‭10 visitors were very dissatisfied after visiting and‬‭only 5‬
‭respondents had no response.‬

I‭t is interesting to note that‬‭the number of respondents with no response remained‬

‭unchanged after refurbishment‬‭. However, the number of‬‭satisfied visitors increased‬
‭slightly to 40‬‭, followed by the corresponding figure of those who were very satisfied, with 35‬
‭visitors. Conversely,‬‭the number of dissatisfied visitors decreased dramatically from 40 to‬
‭15 during the two periods.‬