DOC-Module -6
DOC-Module -6
MODULE 6 NOTES
Project Management
CONTENTS
1. Introduction 3
2. The key processes 4
3. Management by exception – directing a project 6
4. Controlling a stage (CS) 6
5. Authorising a work package 7
6. Project plan execution 7
7. Assessing progress 8
8. Capturing project issues 8
9. Examining project issues 9
10. Reviewing stage status 9
11. Reporting highlights 10
12. Taking corrective action 10
13. Escalating project issues 11
14. Receiving a completed work package 12
15. Managing product delivery (MP) 12
16. Overall change control 14
17. Wrap-up 15
DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this document is accurate at the time of printing. However, factors beyond Damelin’s control (such as environmental, regulatory, or technical changes) may cause the contents
of this document and/or of the programme to change. In the event of any such change, Damelin will attempt to formally notify current students. All possible measures will be taken to minimise inconvenience to students.
PROJECT MANAGEMENT | MODULE 6 NOTES | ACTIONS FOR SUCCESSFUL EXECUTION
DAMELIN HET – Damelin (Pty) Ltd is registered with the Department of Higher Education and Training as a Private Higher Education Institution under the Higher Education Act No. 101 of 1997 and its higher education programmes are accredited by the
Council on Higher Education (CHE). Registration Number: 2001/HE07/009. DAMELIN FET – Damelin (Pty) Ltd is provisionally registered with the Department of Higher Education and Training as a private college under the Continuing Education and
© DAMELIN 2022 2
Training Act No. 16 of 2006. Registration Certificate No: 2008/FE07/089. Damelin (Pty) Ltd is also provisionally accredited by Umalusi, the Quality Council for General and Further Education and Training. Damelin (Pty) Ltd is further accredited by the
Quality Council for Trades and Occupations (QCTO).
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
1. INTRODUCTION
The activities for successful execution are compounded in nature and terms of your contextual framework,
involving multiple processes and activities. During the execution and project control phases, your project has to
be monitored and controlled to see whether it is performed according to your existing schedule. If deviations
occur, you will have to take corrective actions. Incorporated in the project life cycle is this control mechanism
incorporated using the feedback loop, between the control phase and the scheduling phase.
During project execution stage, set boundaries, and monitor your project progress using the information in your
schedule. Make adaptations to the schedule when the deviations become too large. Your execution process
provides project management with key decision points, on whether to continue with the project or not.
The objectives of the project are to:
• Assure your project board that all deliverables planned in the current stage plan have been completed
as defined
• Provide the information needed for your project board to assess the continuing viability of your project
• Provide your project board with the information needed to approve the current stage's completion and
authorise the start of the next stage, together with its delegated tolerance level
• Record any measurements or lessons which can help later stages of your project and, or other projects
One of the main functions during the execution of your project is the control process which includes the
monitoring and control activities for which you, the project manager is responsible, ensuring that each stage
stays on course, and reacts to unexpected events. The control function forms the core of your effort on the
project. It is the process which handles the day-to-day management of your project.
Throughout a stage, there will be a cycle consisting of:
These activities are combined with the on-going work of risk management and change control.
Step 1
Control of the initiation of your project ensuring it has the best possible start
Step 2
Step 3
Authorising continuation of your project where a significant departure from the approved plans has occurred
Step 4
Control of the stage boundaries, committing new and additional resources as your project progresses towards
its ultimate aim
Step 5
Ad-hoc decision-making and direction, monitoring progress and providing advice and guidance as necessary;
and
Step 6
When your project has achieved its outcome or is no longer considered a viable business proposition, arrange
for project closure, bringing the whole undertaking to a controlled finish.
As a project manager, you are responsible for the day-to-day activities of managing the project. Information
should be presented to your project board in a number of ways, from formal report documents such as the
Project Initiation Document (PID), to highlight reports, usually prepared on a monthly basis, to requests for ad-
hoc direction you require. Monitor variance from your plan and take corrective action.
Execution is one of the busiest phases of project management regarding potential and actual
inputs and outputs and the physical interpretation of how to direct a project may be expected
from you to add further reports and directives.
A key requirement within execution is having senior managers on the project board who have the
organisational authority to commit the resources that you need to see your project through to a successful
conclusion. The ability to make decisions on the commitment of additional resources, in the event of problems
and the vision to see the wider picture, are also vital ingredients resident within this process (Bradley, 2005).
Your project board must provide overall strategic guidance for your project. It should also
establish an effective risk management strategy and a quality assurance team with clearly
outlined duties.
An essential duty of the project board should provide you with advice and direction. Upon completion, compile
the end-project report, and a report containing the lessons learnt, and the post-project review planned and
scheduled.
Project board members should view a project strategically and become involved only at planned review dates,
and at unscheduled meetings if the project significantly departs from your approved plan. When making a
forecast that the current stage will not be completed within tolerance (standard tolerance of time and cost), in
an exception report being prepared by the project manager, for consideration by the project board members.
As a project manager, producing an exception plan will often follow, which will be considered by your project
board at a specially convened mid-stage assessment.
Work packages are released to team managers or directly to staff working on the project, via
the authorised work packages and job descriptions.
or
Much less formal: (for example via internal memorandum or discussion), where the host organisation employs
the provider.
Where a formal contract is in existence, care must be taken not to upset the contract
arrangements with demands for trivial changes.
This process provides you with the main vehicle for the release of work and is a major control on a day-to-day
basis (Bradley, 2005).
7. ASSESSING PROGRESS
As a project manager, you must keep track of how well the management stage, and the project, performs
against the plan approved by your project board. This process provides the mechanics for capturing “actuals,”
and passing that information on to “Reviewing Stage Status,” where you can take stock of progress up to date.
The information you need to update the approved management stage plan comes from three major sources:
• Checkpoint reports
• Timesheets (where these are in use within the hosting organisation – otherwise your assessment of effort
expended and financial liability incurred); and
• Project issues, especially where you have identified errors or departures from the agreed requirement.
This process is best carried out by project support, where appointed, with a presentation of the
plans, updated to show “actuals” to the project manager, for overall assessment on at least a
weekly basis.
Use of a suitable software planning tool (such as MS Project, Project Manager Workbench, Pri-mavera) will
simplify this process especially if standard “actuals” reporting forms, generated within the package, are fully
utilised. The output from this process will be considered in the project manager’s review (Bradley, 2005).
Off-specification
Off-specification causing errors or omissions in work already completed or planned - usually paid for by the
supplier.
Other
Other changes such as modification to the project management team (Bradley, 2005).
Typically, organisations will have their own existing change control arrangements, and these should be
adopted where they are performing satisfactorily.
This process enables the examination of each project issue and assesses its impact.
It should be carried out as soon as possible, after receipt and logging of the project issue. The examination and
evaluation of project issues may take place via a regular meeting, or by circulation of the issue and comments
to those involved. Whatever route is chosen, you need to record the progress in the issues log.
Always examine project issues from a customer, supplier, and business perspective.
Any action needed, which would take the project stage over the agreed tolerance level, must be referred to
your project board, in the form of an exception report.
Any action needed, which would take the project stage over the agreed tolerance level, must
be referred to your project board, in the form of an exception report.
Responsibility for examining project issues rests with you, as the project manager, who will use the support
services of team managers, in helping arrive at an appropriate decision. The senior member of the project
board will prioritise and if necessary canvas the project board, for any additional resources needed to clear
outstanding project issues. Prioritisation of outstanding project issues is usually done by referring to the issues
log at each end-stage assessment (Bradley, 2005).
Step 1
Assemble information from checkpoint reports and project issues received during the previous period since
the last highlight report.
Step 2
Identify any new or potential problem arising from “reviewing stage status”.
Step 3
Identify any significant revisions to the approved plan from “taking corrective action”.
Step 4
Create the highlight report (project support might well produce the first draft).
Step 5
Distribute the highlight report to your project board members and any other agreed recipients.
The highlight report does not normally require a meeting of your project board, although this is an option
for high-profile, high-risk projects where the project board is particularly sensitive about the progress made
(Bradley, 2005).
In even the best-managed projects, departures from the planned course of action will occur,
and remedial action must be taken to bring the work back into line.
This process enables you, as the project manager, to make small adjustments, within the agreed tolerance, to
work being carried out.
The main driver for the process comes from the “reviewing stage status,” where deviations from your required
and planned outcome will start to become apparent. Projects seldom change course dramatically, but rather
many smaller incidents prompt significant slippage, and this process aims to treat each incident as it occurs.
In this process, additional work packages are identified. You might need to source advice and guidance from
project board members, and this will usually take place in an informal way. Consider the report to your project
board and include changes on the next highlight report, but this should be the exception rather than the rule.
You are responsible for the operation of this process, helped by your project management team. As a project
manager, you should always be aware of the build-up of apparently minor problems being symptomatic
of bigger trouble with the project. Although many things may contribute to or trigger this process, the most
common situation is where a project issue has been raised to record an error or deficiency with one or more
products.
Step 1
Identify the problem and carry out an impact analysis.
Step 2
Identify and evaluate options for recovery.
Step 3
Select a recommended direction.
Step 4
Document the problem, reasons, impact, options and recommendations in an exception.
Step 5
Await your project board’s response.
The expected outcome will be a request for you to produce an exception plan, which will replace the plan that
has gone into exception. Always seek your project board’s views and advice before producing an exception
plan, and the effect on your overall project plan (including the business case and risks) must always be
evaluated (Bradley, 2005).
Step 1
Identify the problem and carry out an impact analysis.
Step 2
Identify and evaluate options for recovery.
Step 3
Select a recommended direction.
Step 4
Document the problem, reasons, impact, options and recommendations in an exception.
Step 5
Await your project board’s response.
This process records the successful completion of a work package (or product) and delivery of
it back into your host organisation.
It is closely associated with “authorising a work package” discussed earlier. The arrangements for delivering
your completed work package would have been agreed when the work package was accepted by your
supplier, team manager or person responsible for its production in the process “accepting a work package.”
Completed work packages or products delivered into your host organisation will all have been quality reviewed
(in process “executing a work package”) in accordance with the requirements agreed when the work package
was accepted. The results of the process are used to assess the progress made by recording the task as
complete and updating the management stage and project records accordingly.
Controlling a stage (CS) is the main project management driver for a PRINCE 2 controlled project. The process
is owned by the project manager and is where most of the “day-to-day” project management activities are
carried out (Bradley, 2005).
This major process is aimed primarily at managing the interface between the customer project
manager (CPM) and the supplier project manager (SPM).
This major process is aimed primarily at managing the interface between the customer project manager (CPM)
and the supplier project manager (SPM).
Ensure that work is progressing in accordance with your customer’s expectations and that all the planned
products are created and delivered within the agreed timescales and contract price, or internally approved
budget, and meet their approved quality criteria. Use the process for managing the delivery of products where
an external supplier is not involved in the project and where all resources managed by the project are internal;
it is also appropriate where there is a mixture of both.
The process comprises the following:
Step 1
Make certain that work on products allocated to each external team or team member resource is properly
authorised.
Step 2
Ensure that packages of work are identified, discussed, agreed, authorised and accepted by those responsible
for the creation of products.
Step 3
Check that all interfaces between the customer and supplier organisations are identified, recorded, observed
and handled in an appropriate way.
Step 4
Ensure that all the work is carried out, as agreed.
Step 5
Ensure that the progress of work and forecasts of the time and effort to completion are regularly assessed.
Step 6
Check that all finished products conform to their agreed quality criteria.
Step 7
Obtain approval for completed products. It will usually be at three levels – producer and reviewer level, project
manager level and, ultimately, endorsement by the project board at the end of each project stage. These levels
of approval will be reflected in both your customer and specialist supplier organisations, although it is not
necessary that either will be working within a PRINCE environment; it is essential, however, that all involved are
working within a suitably controlled project management environment (Bradley, 2005).
This process will operate continuously throughout each stage; it provides a healthy separation between the
customer project manager and the supplier project manager and requires the interface between the supplier(s)
(be they internal or external) and the customer to be identified, defined and operated. Care must be taken to
ensure that the interfaces are neither missed nor lost and that bureaucracy is kept to the absolute minimum
consistent with effective control. Where a project manager allocates work directly to individuals responsible for
carrying out the work package, this process will be informal but will always exist.
Inputs
• Project plan
• Supporting detail
• Organisational policies
• Corrective action (as things go wrong during the execution phase, they must be corrected and at the
same action must be initiated to prevent a recurrence of the same errors)
Outputs
• Work results (measurement or estimate expenditure against budget)
• Change requests (changes in project scope identified during the execution phase)
Inputs
1. Project plan
2. Performance reports (reports of actual work completed as submitted to the performance review meetings,
refer project plan execution tools and techniques)
Outputs
1. Project plan updates (authorised changes to the project baseline plan as established during the project
plan development phase)
2. Corrective action and lessons learned (throughout the project, review progress and corrective actions
continuously and record these for future reference)
17. WRAP-UP
During the execution and project control phases, your project has to be monitored and controlled to see
whether it is performing according to your existing schedule. If deviations occur, you must take corrective
action. This control mechanism has been incorporated in the project lifecycle using the feedback loop
between your control phase and your scheduling phase. You must report any deviation to your project board
through an exception report, which will enable your project board to take corrective actions.
Project quality focuses on the end product or service deliverables that reflect the purpose of your project. You
(the project manager) are responsible for developing a project execution approach that provides for a clear
understanding of your expected project deliverables and the quality specifications. The project manager of a
housing construction project not only needs to understand which rooms to carpet in the house but also what
grade of carpet is needed. A room with a high volume of traffic will need a high-grade carpet. The project
manager is responsible for developing a project quality plan that defines the quality expectations and assures
that you meet the specifications and expectations.
You need to deliver your project within budget and timelines, according to customer requirements. It is the
responsibility of your project board, through you, to manage and control the project to achieve all set goals and
objectives.