0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views14 pages

Health Risks Linked To The Consumption of Water From Shallow Aquifers in The City of Daloa (Central-Western Ivory Coast)

The study investigates health risks associated with consuming water from shallow aquifers in Daloa, Ivory Coast, where residents often rely on untreated well and spring water due to dissatisfaction with public water quality. Analysis reveals that these water sources are contaminated with heavy metals, particularly chromium VI, leading to significant health risks including gastrointestinal issues and cancer. The findings underscore the urgent need for improved water quality management to protect public health in the region.

Uploaded by

IJAR JOURNAL
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views14 pages

Health Risks Linked To The Consumption of Water From Shallow Aquifers in The City of Daloa (Central-Western Ivory Coast)

The study investigates health risks associated with consuming water from shallow aquifers in Daloa, Ivory Coast, where residents often rely on untreated well and spring water due to dissatisfaction with public water quality. Analysis reveals that these water sources are contaminated with heavy metals, particularly chromium VI, leading to significant health risks including gastrointestinal issues and cancer. The findings underscore the urgent need for improved water quality management to protect public health in the region.

Uploaded by

IJAR JOURNAL
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 14

ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res.

12(12), 993-1006

Journal Homepage: -www.journalijar.com

Article DOI:10.21474/IJAR01/20110
DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/20110

RESEARCH ARTICLE
HEALTH RISKS LINKED TO THE CONSUMPTION OF WATER FROM SHALLOW AQUIFERS IN
THE CITY OF DALOA (CENTRAL-WESTERN IVORY COAST)

Kré Yon Edwige, Kamenan Yiwa Monique, Mangoua Oi Mangoua Jules, Konan Kouakou Séraphin, Eblin
Sampah Georges and Dibi Brou
Environmental Science and Technology Laboratory, Jean Lorougnon Guede University, BP 150 Daloa, Daloa, Côte
d’Ivoire.
……………………………………………………………………………………………………....
Manuscript Info Abstract
……………………. ………………………………………………………………
Manuscript History The water provided by the public network in the city ofDaloa is
Received: 22 October 2024 rejected by residents because of the disagreeable organoleptic
Final Accepted: 25 November 2024 characteristics. This situation has pushed a large, proportion of the
Published: December 2024 population to exploit the water from resurgent springs and traditional
wells. However, these waters tap into alterite aquifers, which are the
Key words:-
Heavy Metals, Natural Springs, first reservoir to receive seepage water that is often highly laden with
Traditional Wells, Quality Index, Hazard impurities. As a result, these waters could be contaminated by domestic
Quotient and industrial effluents, deteriorating their quality and impacting
consumer health. Hence the need to evaluate the health risk from these
waters. To this end, seasonal analyses of physico-chemical parameters
on 40 waters points have been carried out. Methodological approach
consisted of using the water quality index and the probabilistic risk
method. As a result, these waters are rich in heavy metals whatever the
season, and the quality varies from very poor to good for wells and
from poor to good for springs. Thus, the chromium VI-related health
risk for these waters in both seasons has a hazard quotient greater than
1. The level of carcinogenic risk is also very high, with a value greater
than 10-4. People are therefore exposed to gastrointestinal risks and can
contract cancer when they consume untreated well and spring water.
Copyright, IJAR, 2024,. All rights reserved.
……………………………………………………………………………………………………....
Introduction:-
The problem of human health, in different parts of the world, is closely associated with environmental and
groundwater pollution (Adimalla et al., 2018 ; Babuji et al., 2023). Speaking of groundwater contamination by
physicochemical substances, it is a very important concern in the current century (Babuji et al., 2023 ; Rajan et al.,
2024). These concerns are widespread throughout the world, because water pollution affects people's health and
well-being. In fact, ingesting contaminated water causes serious problems for human health (Ramos et al., 2023).
This is the case for metals, which have various impacts on health, such as cancers, respiratory diseases,
gastrointestinal disorders and skin allergies (Mawari et al., 2022). And, according to the WHO (2017), more than 1,1
million children under the age of 5 and the elderly, who live where hygiene measures and sanitation systems are
inadequate, die each year from diarrhoeal diseases, of which 90% are due to the poor quality of the drinking water.
This problem affects developing countries enormously, especially urban areas, where rapid population growth, lack
of adequate sanitation, industrial operations and climatic variations influence the quality of groundwater resources
used for human consumption (Mendieta-Mendoza et al., 2021 ; Babuji et al., 2023). Daloa, the area covered by this

Corresponding Author:-Kré Yon Edwige 993


Address:-Environmental Science and Technology Laboratory, Jean Lorougnon Guede
University, BP 150 Daloa, Daloa, Côte d’Ivoire.
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 12(12), 993-1006

study, is not exempt from this problem. In Daloa, the presence of uncontrolled household waste dumps, wastewater
run-off and faulty septic tanks located less than 15 m from water points make us fear the risk of groundwater
contamination and harmful effects on consumer health. However, these water tables, exploited by traditional wells
and natural springs, are often used without appropriate treatment by the majority of the population of Daloa. Faced
with this situation, it is important to assess the possible health risks to the population so as to avert the appearance of
illnesses linked to unsafe water. Thus, this study contributes to points 3 (Good health and well-being) and 6 (Clean
water and sanitation) of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Material and Methods:-


Presentation of the study site
Daloa is a city in the centre-west of Ivory Coast, covering an area of 97.28 km2. It is located geographically between
6°22' and 6°29' west longitude and between 6°49' and 6°56' north latitude (Fig 1). It is the third most populous city
in Ivory Coast, with an estimated population of 421,879 (INS, 2021). Daloa is governed by an attenuated transitional
tropical climate with a rainy season (March - October) and a dry season (November - February). Daloa lies in a
single geological domain, namely migmatites on heterogeneous granitoids and there is generally a composite aquifer
in this environment composed of fractured layers topped by layers of alterites (Lachassagneet al., 2011). However,
alterites are the first to receive infiltration water from rainfall, of which the reserves are tapped by traditional wells
and modern wells (Lasmet al., 2004).

Fig 1:-City map and spatial distribution of sampling points.

Realisation of the survey


A survey was carried out in March 2022, which marks the start of the rainy season, among households in the city of
Daloa by means of direct interviews and observations using questionnaires. The survey focused on the use made of
well and spring water, the populations consuming it and the method of treatment applied. The sample (households in
the city) was selected on the basis of simple random sampling as described by Quivy&Campenhout (1988). Based
on this sampling method, the sample size was determined using the equation of Islam (2018) :

994
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 12(12), 993-1006

𝒁𝟐 ×𝒑(𝟏−𝒑)
𝒏= (1)
𝒆𝟐

With n the sample size ; z the constant resulting from the normal distribution according to a
selected confidence level ; p the proportion of the population using well and spring water and
e the estimated margin of error.
For the present study, the data used are : z = 1.96 ; p = 70% and e = 0.05. The equation thus becomes :
𝟏.𝟗𝟔𝟐 ×𝟎.𝟕(𝟏−𝟎.𝟕)
𝒏= = 𝟑𝟐𝟐(2)
𝟎.𝟎𝟓𝟐
However, only 200 of the 322 households agreed to be interviewed. The results will therefore concern the 200
households. The details of the households interviewed are given in Table I in the appendices.
Sampling and analyses
This study required sampling campaigns at high water (march 2022) and low water (november 2022). These
sampling campaigns were carried out at 30 wells and 10 springs throughout the city of Daloa (Figure 1). Two (2)
intakes of water were carried out for each water point in order to determine nutrient salts and heavy metals in the
laboratory. The following procedure was adopted for sampling : firstly, Garmin-type GPS (Global Positioning
System) was used to locate the water points. Next, the water samples were taken in 1 L bottles that had been
sufficiently rinsed with the water to be analysed and labelled. Only water destined for analysis of heavy metals was
acidified with nitric acid (60%). The bottles were filled to reflux and hermetically sealed to ensure that there were no
air bubbles and that the water was not ejected during transport. Finally, five (5) parameters (temperature, pH,
electrical conductivity, dissolved oxygen and redox potential) were measured in situ with the HACH HQ40d
multiparameter. The method used is called potentiometry. To do this, deionised water and the water to be analysed
were used to rinse the various probes before being immersed in the water. The values are read on the screen once
they have stabilised. In the laboratory, nutrient salts, chromium VI and heavy metals were analysed by molecular
absorption spectrometry with the addition of specific reagents and X-ray fluorescence using different standards.

Analysis of significant temporal variation


The study of spatio-temporal variation required the application of a univariate statistical test. The parameters were
subjected to non-parametric Mann-Whitney test at a significance level of 5 %. This test was applied because the data
did not meet the conditions for application (normality of the data, equality of variances, quantitative data,
independence of the data and number of data greater than 5) of a parametric test.

Assessment of water quality using the index method


Among the methods used to assess water quality, the index method seems interesting. Thus, the groundwater quality
index (IQE) was used to assess the specific quality of each water point. This index is defined as an estimate of water
quality based on the influence of many parameters (Ramakrishnaiah et al., 2009) and maximum guides values for
the different parameters. The calculation was carried out in three (3) steps.

Weighting of parameters
Unit weights wi were assigned to seven parameters that directly influence health (nitrates,nitrites, sulfates,
ammonium, nickel, chromium and lead), four acceptability parameters(calcium, magnesium, iron, manganese) and
three regulatory parameters (temperature,hydrogen potential and electrical conductivity), taking into account their
importance indetermining water quality. Thus, those that have an adverse effect on health have the highest
weights on a scale of 1 to 5 (Ramakrishnaiah et al., 2009 ; WHO, 2017) (Table II in appendices).The relative weight
is then determined according to Srinivas &Nageswararao (2013) :
𝒘𝒊
𝑾𝒊 = 𝟏𝟓 𝒘𝒊(3)
𝒊=𝟏
Wi : relative weight and wi : unit weight of parameter i.

Parametric index determination (qi)


The parametric index (qi) is an estimation scale calculated for each parameter. It is determined according to the
equation below :
𝑪
𝒒𝒊 = 𝟏𝟎𝟎 × 𝒊 (4)
𝑺𝒊
Ci :concentration of parameter and Si : maximum guide value of parameter.

995
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 12(12), 993-1006

Determination of global groundwater quality index


The final calculation of the WQI (Equation 5) consists of summing the products of the parametric index and the
relative weights of all the parameters considered :
𝑮𝑸𝑰 = 𝑾𝒊 × 𝒒𝒊(5)
A class is then assigned according to the index calculated. According to Ramakrishnaiah et al. (2009), there are 5
classes : excellent (GQI < 50) ; good (50 < GQI < 100) ; poor (100 < GQI < 200) ; very poor (200 < GQI < 300) and
inappropriate for consumption (GQI > 300).
Estimation of the carcinogenic or non-carcinogenic risk of chromium VI
Health risk refers to the probability of encountering a hazardous substance likely to cause disease in humans (Babuji
et al., 2023). As a result, this risk is based on two factors : hazard and exposure (Guo et al., 2023). Thus, risk
assessment comprises four stages :

Hazard identification :
It consisted of inventorying the substances to which people are potentially exposed and identifying their harmful
effects, based on criteria such as the type of substance, its concentration and the ailments it causes in children under
5 and adults. Chromium VI was considered in this study. This substance is likely to cause toxic effects on the
gastrointestinal tract, liver, development and lower respiratory tract in humans and cancer by oral ingestion
(Mohammadi et al., 2019 ; US EPA, 2024).

Chromium exposure assessment:


Exposure was assessed by estimating the minimum and average concentrations and daily dose of chromium capable
of causing infection in an individual or a population. To do this, the ingestion of water was considered. The
scenarios considered are as follows : exposure of children under 5 and adults with body weights of 10 and 60 kg
respectively. The average daily dose (ADD) is calculated based on the Sadler et al. (2016) equation :
𝑸
𝑨𝑫𝑫 = 𝑪 × 𝑩𝑾(6)

With ADD : average daily dose (mg/kg/d) ; C : chromium VI concentration (mg/L) ; Q : quantity of water consumed
by day (L/d) ; BW : body weight (kg).
The data used to calculate the average daily dose are given in Table III (Appendices).

Dose-response relationship :
The objective of this step is to define the dose capable of causing a harmful effect. For oral exposure, this is the
reference dose (RfD) (see Table III in appendices).

Risk characterisation :
It consists of estimating the non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic effects of chromium VI on the gastrointestinal tract.
To do this, we determined the hazard quotient (HQ) and the carcinogenic risk (CR) by the oral route.
HQ correspond to the ratio of the average daily dose (ADD) to the reference dose (RfD) (US EPA, 20011)
(Equation7). A hazard quotient greater than 1 indicates a significant risk. On the other hand, when the HQ is less
than 1, this expresses a lesser risk (Wei et al., 2015).
𝑨𝑫𝑫
𝑯𝑸 = (7)
𝑹𝒇𝑫
As for the CR (Equation 8), this involved multiplying the average daily dose by the oral cancer slope factor (OSF)
(Sushila et al., 2024 ; US EPA, 2024). The total lifetime exposure OSF etablished by US EPA (2024) with
application of the age-dependent adjustment factors at constant dose (ADAFs) is 0.27 (mg/kg/day) -1.
𝑪𝑹 = 𝑨𝑫𝑫 × 𝑶𝑪𝑺𝑭(8)
A range of acceptable carcinogenic risk values has been established. When the cancer risk is of 10-6 to 10-4,it is said
to be acceptable (WHO 2017 ; Oni et al., 2022). A cancer risk less than or equal to 10 -6 does not constitute a health
problem for consumers. It is negligible. On the other hand

996
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 12(12), 993-1006

Results and Discussion:-


Results:-
Survey data
Sources of water supply
The survey revealed that people use three principal sources of water supply : well water, spring water and water
from the public network. However, the majority use well water (42 %) only for drinking, to the detriment of water
from the public network (4 %) and resurgent springs (3 %). On the other hand, 24 % of these households use well
and spring water simultaneously ; 18 % consume water in plastic bags and from tanks (water from springs and the
public network respectively) and 9 % of households drink water from wells, springs and the public network at the
same time (Fig 2).
42%

24%

18%

9%

3% 4%

Well Springs Public network Well and spring Well, spring and network Others

Fig 2:-Distribution of water supply sources in the city of Daloa.

Treatment applied
For all the households that consume well and spring water (78 %), 32 % state that they do not apply any treatment
and drink the water directly. On the other hand, 30 % inject calcium hypochlorite, commonly known as bleach,
directly into wells and springs. In addition, some households disinfect their water by filtration (13 %), decantation
(13 %) and bleach-filtration (12 %) (Fig 3).

997
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 12(12), 993-1006

Well and spring


32%
30%

13% 13% 12%

Bleach Filtration Decantation Bleach and No treatment


filtration

Fig 3:-Treatment method applied mainly to well and spring water.

Diseases detected
Fig 4 shows the various illnesses identified during the direct interviews with households in the city of Daloa. People
stated that when they drink well or spring water, they often experience diarrhoea (46%), cholera (19%) and stomach
pains (16%).

19% 19%

16%

46%

cholera diarrhoea Stomach pains No desease


Fig 4:-Diseases encountered following consumption of well and spring water.

Basic physico-chemical characteristics of well and spring water


The table IV present the results of the univariate analysis carried out on the mean values of the fourteen (14)
parameters studied (see in Appendices). It highlight the significant temporal variation in the different parameters. A
total of eight (8) parameters for wells and seven (7) for springs vary significantly from one season to another. Thus,
for wells, we note high values of temperature, sulfates, manganese, calcium and nickel in the rainy season. The

998
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 12(12), 993-1006

opposite is true for nitrates, ammonium and iron, where average concentrations exceed WHO (2017) limit values
during the dry season. Regarding the sources, the temperature, sulfates, manganese, calcium, and chromium are high
in the rainy season. In the dry season, however, mean nitrate and ammonium concentrations are high.

Chemical quality of well and spring water


Fig 5 shows the chemical quality of well water sampled in the rainy season (histograms above) and in the dry season
(histogram below). On the basis of the 14 physico-chemical parameters considered, the GQIs have enabled the well
water to be classified into three classes in the rainy season : poor, very poor and inappropriate. The indices obtained
are between 126 and 527, which exceeds the limit for good quality water, which is 100. In the dry season, however,
the quality of this water passes into good and poor.

700

600

500

400
GQI

300

200

100

P22
P10
P11
P12
P13
P14
P15
P16
P17
P18
P19
P20
P21

P23
P24
P25
P26
P27
P28
P29
P30
P8
P1
P2
P3
P4
P5
P6
P7

P9

WELL

Mauvaise Inappropiate Very poor Poor


Fig 5:-Chemical quality indexes and classes for well water.

The variation in the chemical quality of spring water according to season is shown in Fig 6. In the rainy season, the
quality of spring water remains poor, with indices ranging from 159 to 198. However, it varies from good to poor in
the dry season. It should be noted that the quality of springs S1, S3, S6 and S9 remains unchanged, regardless of the
season. It was also noted that the S4 spring dried up in the dry season, so the quality was only determined in the
rainy season.

Characteristics of the chemical health risk


The health risk results for chromium indicate exposure of adults and children under 5 who consume well and spring
water. Indeed, the hazard quotient (HQ) values are vastly greater than 1 for both well water and spring water in all
seasons (Tables V and VI). In comparison with the rainy season, the hazard quotients obtained by ingesting water in
the dry season decrease for both water sources. In both cases, the probability of the effects appearing in the
population is very high. However, this study shows that children under the age of 5 are the most vulnerable when
they consume spring water (5.08 < HQ < 22.13) and well water (4.96 < HQ < 5.93).

Also, this study showed that 0.02 and 0.03 mg/L are the lowest concentrations that have been obtained in drinking
water and already indicate the presence of a high risk of gastrointestinal illness in children under 5 and adults
respectively (see Table VII in appendices).

Concerning the level of carcinogenic risk linked to ingested chromium VI, the results are presented in Tables V and
VI. It can be seen that there is indeed an increased risk of cancer of the gastrointestinal tract in the populations

999
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 12(12), 993-1006

concerned who drink well water and spring water from Daloa. In fact, the CR obtained range from 4.0 x 10 -4 to 5.4 x
10-3. These are all above the threshold range of 10 -6 to 10-4. However, this risk decreases in the dry season for both
adults and children under 5.

300

250

200
GQI

150

100

50

0
S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10

SPRING

Mauvaise Poor

Fig 6:-Chemical quality indexes and classes for well water.

Table V:-Characterization of the chemical risk related to chromium in well water.


Well Scenarios Cmeans ADDmeans HQmeans CR
Children under 5 years old 0.05 0.0053 5.93 1.4 x 10-3
Rainy season
Adults 0.05 0.0018 1.97 4.8 x 10-4
Children under 5 years old 0.045 0.0045 4.96 1.2 x 10-3
Dry season
Adults 0.045 0.0015 1.65 4.0 x 10-4

Table VI:-Characterization of the chemical risk related to chromium in spring water.


Spring Scenarios Cmeans ADDmeans HQmeans CR
Children under 5 years old 0.199 0.0199 22.13 5.4 x 10-3
Rainy season
Adults 0.199 0.0066 7.37 1.8 x 10-3
Children under 5 years old 0.046 0.0045 5.08 1.2 x 10-3
Dry season
Adults 0.046 0.0015 1.69 4.1 x 10-4

Discussion:-
The survey carried out among households in the city of Daloa enabled us to appreciate the place or proportion that
well water and spring water occupy in their daily habits. Indeed, it shows that 42 % of households use well water
and 3% resurgent springs. These values could be explained by the fact that the majority of concessions in Daloa
have a well. As for springs, these concern the 10 springs found in only a few neighbourhoods. These results
corroborate those obtained by Awomon et al. (2018) and by Konan-Waidhet et al. (2020) at Orly (Daloa) and the
Lobo catchment respectively.Their work highlighted increased use of well water (79.05 % ; 54.94 %). However,
these results differ from those of Kouadio (2021), who conducted a survey of water supply sources in seven (7)
cities, including Daloa, which uses around 55 % of water from the public network to the detriment of well water.

Next, these waters are consumed by everyone (adults, young people and children) and are disinfected by 68 % of
households using either granulated calcium hypochlorite, filtration or decantation. For them, the use of bleach,

1000
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 12(12), 993-1006

especially for treatment, seems to be effective in killing all the microbes in the water. On the other hand, 32 % stated
that they did not use any treatment at all, as they felt that the organoleptic quality of their water was better than that
of water from the public network. In contrast, the results of Awomon et al. (2018) showed treatment by filtration.
This study therefore made it possible to set up the scenarios (adults and children under 5) for assessing health risks.
The WHO (2017) stipulates that this is a specific sub-population more exposed than the rest of the population to a
given substance in relation to body weight. Following consumption of these waters, illnesses were detected by the
population surveyed. Indeed, cases of diarrhoea (46%), cholera (19%) and stomach ache (16%) were reported,
compared with 19% of people who had not observed any illnesses. These rates indicate that there are certain toxic or
carcinogenic parameters in the water consumed. These results were also highlighted by Traoré (2021) who recorded
52.54% cases of diarrhoea, 15.25% cases of typhoid fever, followed by 11.86% cases of dermatosis in the
Balouzonneighbourhood of Daloa.

From the above, 14 parameters were analysed in well and spring water in the city of Daloa. These were temperature,
hydrogen potential, electrical conductivity, iron, manganese, calcium, magnesium, lead, chromium, nickel,
sulphates, nitrites, nitrates and ammonium. Subsequently, the Mann Whitney test applied revealed that certain
parameters varied significantly over time. Thus, for wells, these are temperature, sulfates, manganese, calcium and
nickel which present high values in the rainy season. This is the opposite case for nitrates, ammonium and iron
where average concentrations exceed limit values during dry season. Regarding the sources, temperature, sulfates,
manganese, calcium, and chromium are high in rainy season. In the dry period, however, mean nitrate and
ammonium concentrations are high. These parameters are governed by climate, geology and human activity. The
variation in these parameters could be explained by the hydrolysis of certain silicate minerals such as quartz, mica,
plagioclase and pyrite (geology of the area), but also by the rainfall of contaminants on the surface and their
infiltration into groundwater. These results differ from those of Kouadio (2019), who found an increase in Fe, SO 42-,
NO3- and a decrease in Ca2+ and Mg2+ during the main rainy season in all the wells studied. Physico-chemical
parameters vary greatly because wells and springs are not very deep, as is the case in Daloa. Indeed, the wells and
springs in Daloa are located in the first layer of alterites called alloterite, with depths ranging from 1.04 m to 20.42
m. The depth determines the distance the pollutant has to travel before reaching the water table (Kouadio 2019). The
higher the water level, the faster the pollutant could reach the water table (Maqsoomet al. 2021 ; Patel et al. 2023).

Concerning the physico-chemical quality of well and spring water, it varies from one season to another. Indeed,
water of poor, very poor and inappropriate quality is obtained in the rainy season and of good and poor quality in the
dry season. This variation in water quality is attributable to the presence of heavy metals, which are present in high
concentrations in the water. These results differ from those of Kouadio (2019) and Kamenan (2021), who worked in
the same environment. This difference is probably linked to the number and types of parameters considered. In the
present study, 14 parameters were used, which is not the case for these authors, who used 12 and 11 parameters
respectively.
As a result of the water quality assessment, the people of Daloa are exposed to gastrointestinal diseases. Indeed, the
hazard quotient (HQ) values obtained for the different scenarios are very high for both well water and spring water
during the rainy and dry seasons, with HQs vastly higher than 1. However, children under the age of 5 are the most
vulnerable when they consume spring water (5.08 < HQ < 22.13) and well water (4.96 < HQ < 5.93).
Therefore, low concentrations of heavy metals have been shown to be just as harmful to humans (Sanou et al.,
2022). In fact, this study showed that 0.02 and 0.03 mg/L are the lowest concentrations that have been obtained in
drinking water and already indicate the presence of a high risk of gastrointestinal illness in children under 5 and
adults respectively. It could therefore be said that for concentrations of CrVI (above 7% of total chromium) there is
a high risk of gastrointestinal disease. These results differ from those of Adeyemi &Ojekunle (2021), Shi et al.
(2022) and Below et al. (2024) who carried out their research in countries such as Nigeria, China and Ethiopia. They
all found HQ values of less than 1. This difference is thought to be linked to the quantity of water, the body weights
of adults and children and the RfD. In fact, these authors used ingestion rates ranging from 2 to 2.8 L/d and 70 kg
body weight for adults and 0.64 to 1.8 L/d and 10 to 30 kg body weight for children. The RfD used is 0.003 mg/kg/j.
In addition, drinking Daloa water can lead to cancer of the gastrointestinal tract in children and adults with body
weights of 10 and 60 kg respectively. In fact, the carcinogenic risk values are all greater than 10 -4 with a slight
decrease in the dry season. This reduction could be explained by the fact that it does not rain enough in the dry
season. As a result, rainfall and the infiltration of chromium and chromium VI are limited. This would favour a
reduction in the chromium VI content and an increase in Cr III, which is essential for humans, in the water. These
results were obtained by Oni et al. (2022) who worked on well water in Nigeria. Although they used 0.5 (mg/kg/d) -

1001
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 12(12), 993-1006

1
as the oral slope factor, they found CR values greater than 10 -4 (0,000330 and 0,000155 for children and adults
respectively). However, this is not what was observed in the work of Saber et al. (2024) in Egypt. They obtained CR
values that are 9.43528 x10-8 and that are below 10-6. This difference is probably linked to the very low
concentrations of chromium analysed in spring water.

Conclusion:-
This study aimed to estimate the potential health risk linked to the consumption of well and spring water in Daloa.
Therefore, it necessitated first determining the quality of the water and then estimating the health risk associated
with chromiumVI using the probabilistic method. To do this, analyses were carried out on 30 well water samples
and 10 spring water samples, depending on the season. After analysis, it was found that the well and spring water
contained low values of nutrient salts but high contents of metals, particularly total chromium. Most of the chemical
quality parameters are below the WHO standard for drinking water, with the exception of heavy metals, and vary
from season to season. As a result, the quality index obtained on the basis of the 14 parameters considered revealed
seasonal variations in water quality. In fact, during the rainy season, well and spring water quality ranges from poor
to inappropriate. In the dry season, the quality becomes good and poor. These waters are therefore subject to natural
and man-made pollution. Consequently, the consumption of well and spring water would have harmful effects on
the health of children under 5 and adults, because the probability of these effects occurring is very high (HQ > 1). In
addition, drinking Daloa water can lead to cancer of the gastrointestinal tract in children and adults with body
weights of 10 and 60 kg respectively. In fact, the carcinogenic risk values are all greater than 10 -4 with a slight
decrease in the dry season. Although this study has produced some interesting results, it could be supplemented by
other investigations, a microbiological study. The precarious sewage system that exists in Daloa could encourage the
infiltration of wastewater containing bacteria into the groundwater.

References:-
1. Adimalla N., Li P. &Venkatayogi S. (2018). Hydrogeochemical Evaluation of Groundwater Quality for
Drinking and Irrigation Purposes and Integrated Interpretation with Water Quality Index Studies.
Environmental Processes, 5 : 363-383.
2. Adeyemi A.A. &Ojekunle O.Z. (2023). Concentrations and health risk assessment of industrial heavy metals
pollution in groundwater in Ogun state, Nigeria. Scientific African, 11 : 1-11.
3. Awomon née A.D.F., Coulibaly M., Niamke G.M., & Santos D.S (2018). La problématique de
l'approvisionnementen eau potable et le développement des maladies à transmission hydrique dans les quartiers
d'extension Orly de la ville de Daloa (Côte d'Ivoire). Revue Espace, Territoires, Sociétés et Santé, 1 (2), 91-108.
4. Babuji P., Thirumalaisamy S., Duraisamy K. & Periyasamy G. (2023). Human Health Risks due to Exposure to
Water Pollution : A Review. Water, 15 (14) : 1-15.
5. Belew A.A., Besha A.T. & Belete A.A. (2024). Determination of heavy metals and health risk assessment in
drinking water in Jigjiga City, Ethiopia. Discover Environment, 2 (41) : 1-21.
6. Guo W., Li P., Du Q., Zhou Y., Xu D. & Zhang Z. (2023). Hydrogeochemical Processes Regulating the
GroundwaterGeochemistry and Human Health Risk of Groundwater in the Rural Areas of the Wei River Basin,
China. Exposure and Health, 16 (2) : 291-306.
7. Islam M.R. (2018). Sample size and itsrole in Central Limit Theorem (CLT). International Journal of
Physics&Mathematics, 1 (1) : 37-47.
8. INS (Institut National de la Statistique) (2021). Recensementgénéral de la population et de
l’habitat (RGPH) Résultatsglobaux, (Abidjan Côte d’Ivoire), 26 p.
9. Kamenan Y.M. (2021). Elaboration d’un modèle de protection des eaux souterrainesen zone de socle :cas des
aquifères du bassin versant de la Lobo à Nibéhibé (Centre-Ouest de Côte d’Ivoire). Thèse de doctorat,
Hydrogéologie-Hydrochimie. Géosciences et Environnement de l’Université Jean Lorougnon Guédé (Daloa,
Côte d’Ivoire), 170 p.
10. Konan-Waidhet A.B., Toure F.F., Diarra A., Yao A.B., Koua T.J.J. & Koita M. (2020). GIS Approach for the
Analysis of the Socio-Sanitary Stakes of Water Use in the Lobo Watershed in Nibehibe (Central-Western Côte
d'Ivoire). Asian Journal of Geographical Research 3(4) : 103-115.
11. Kouadio A.N.B. (2019). Évaluation des risques sanitaires liés à la consommation des eaux de puitstraditionnels
par les ménages à faiblesrevenusen milieu urbain :cas de la villed’Agboville (Côte d’Ivoire). Thèse de doctorat,
Hydrochimie. UFR des Sciences et Gestion de l’Environnement de l’UniversitéNanguiAbrogoua (Abidjan, Côte
d’Ivoire), 184 p.
12. Kouadio E.F. (2021). Facteursassociés à la qualité et évaluation des risques sanitaires liés à l’eau de
consommation de sept localités de la Côte d’Ivoire. Thèse unique de Doctorat, Génies des

1002
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 12(12), 993-1006

procédésenvironnementaux, Sécurité et environnement, Institut National Polytechnique Félix


HouphouëtBoigny, (Yamoussoukro, Côte d’Ivoire), 159 p.
13. Lachassagne P., Wyns R. &Dewandel B. (2011). The fracture permeability of Hard Rock Aquifer is due neither
to tectonics, nor to unloading, but to weathering processes. Terra Nova, 23 : 145-161.
14. Lasm T., Kouamé F., Soro N., Jourda J.P.R. &Biémi J. (2004). Analysegéostatistique de la fracturationextraite
de l’imageriespatialeaéroportée et satellitaire. Application à
la région de Man-Danané. Revue ivoirienne des sciences et Technologies, 5 : 135-154.
15. Maqsoom A., Aslam B., Alwetaishi M., Awais M., Hassan U., Maqsoom S., Alaloul S.W., Musarat A.M.,
Zerouali B. & Hussein E.E. (2021). A GIS-Based Groundwater Contamination Assessment Using Modified
DRASTIC Geospatial Technique. Water 13 : 1-23.
16. Mawari G., Kumar N., Sarkar S., Frank L.A., Daga K.M., MongjamMeghachandra Singh M.M., Joshi K.T. &
Singh I. (2022). Human Health Risk Assessment due to Heavy Metals in Ground and Surface Water and
Association of Diseases With Drinking Water Sources : A Study From Maharashtra, India. Environmental
Health Insights, 16 : 1-11.
17. Mendieta-Mendoza A., Hanson R.T. & Renteria-Villalobos M. (2021). Potential adverse impacts
onvulnerability and availability of groundwater from climate-change and land use.Journal of Hydrology, 594 :
1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2023.e00736
18. Mohammadia A.A., Zareib A., Majidic S., Ghaderpouryd A., Hashempoure Y., Saghif M.H., Alinejadg A.,
Yousefih M., Hosseingholizadehi N. &Ghaderpoorij M. (2019). Carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health risk
assessment of heavy metals in drinking water of Khorramabad, Iran. MethodsX, 6 : 1642-1651.
19. OEHHA (Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment) (2020). Cancer Risk and Noncancer Hazard
Index. Fact Sheet for Contaminated Sites in California. California Environmental Protection Agency. 2p.
20. Oni A.A., Babalola S.O., Adeleye A.D., Olagunju T.E., Amama I.A., Omole E.O., Adegboye E.A. & Ohore
O.G. (2022). Non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic health risks associated with heavy metals and polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons in well-water samples from an automobile junk market in Ibadan, SW-Nigeria. Heliyon,
8 : 1-15.
21. Patel P, Mehta D, Sharma N (2023) Assessment of groundwater vulnerability using the GIS approach-based
GOD method in Surat district of Gujarat state, India. Water Practice Technology 18 (2) : 285-294.
22. Quivy R. &Campenhoudt L.V. (1988). Manuel de recherche de sciences sociales. Bordas, Paris, 1 reédition, 271
p.
23. Rajan M., Karunanidhi D., Jaya J., Preethi B., Subramani T. & Aravinthasamy P. (2024). A comprehensive
review on human health hazards due to groundwater contamination : A global perspective. Physics and
Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 135 : 1-8.
24. Ramakrishnaiah C.R., Sadashivaiah C. &Ranganna G. (2009). Assessment of Water Quality Index for the
Groundwater in Tumkur Taluk, Karnataka State, India. E-Journal of
Chemistry, 6 (2) : 523-530.
25. Ramos E., Bux R.K., Médine D.I., Barrios-Piña H. &Mahlknecht J. (2023). Spatial and Multivariate Statistical
Analyses of Human Health Risk Associated with the Consumption of Heavy Metals in Groundwater of
Monterrey Metropolitan Area, Mexico. Water, 15 (6) : 1-20.
26. Sadler R., Maetam B., Edokpolo B., Connell D., Yu J., Stewart D., Park M.-J., Gray D. &Laksono B. (2016).
Health risk assessment for exposure to nitrate in drinking water from village wells in Semarang, Indonesia.
Environmental Pollution, 216 : 738-745.
27. Saber A.A., Al-Mashhadany M.F.M., Hamid A., Gabrieli J., Tockner K., Alsaif S.S.A., Al-Marakeby A.A.M.,
Segadelli S., Cantonati M. & Bhat S.U. (2024). Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Risk Evaluation of
Heavy Metals in Water Sources of the Nubian Sandstone Aquifer in the El-Farafra Oasis (Egypt). Water, 16 : 1-
15.
28. Sanou A., Méité N., KouyatéA., Irankunda E., Kouamé A.N., Koffi A.E., Bohoussou K.J-P. & Kouakou L.P.
(2022). Assessing Levels and Health Risks of Fluoride and Heavy Metal Contamination in Drinking Water.
Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection
29. Shi H., Zeng M., Peng H., Huang C.,Sun H.,Hou Q. & Pi P. (2022). Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals
in Groundwater of Hainan Island Using the Monte Carlo Simulation Coupled with the APCS/MLR Model.
International Journal of Environment Research and Public Health, 19 (13) : 1-18.
30. Srinivas R.G. &Nageswararao G. (2013). Assessment of Groundwater quality using Water Quality Index.
Archives ofEnvironmental Science, 7 : 1-5.
31. Sushila S., Balda A., Balhara N. Aarushi A. & Giri A. (2024). Literature review and health risks assessment of
heavy metal contamination in human milk. Discover Minerals, 1 (2) : 1-19.

1003
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 12(12), 993-1006

32. Traoré D. (2021). Modes d’approvisionnementen eau et risque de maladies hydriques dans le quartier
Balouzonà Daloa (CentreOuest- Cote D’ivoire). Revue Espace, Territoires, Sociétés etSanté, 4 (7) : 179-192.
33. US EPA (2024). IRIS Toxicological Review of Hexavalent Chromium [Cr (VI)] CASRN 18540-29-9.
EPA/635/R-24/164Fc www.epa.gov/iris. 13p.
34. US EPA (2011). ExposureFactorsHandbook, Edition. Washington, 2-9.
35. Wei X., Gao B., Wang P., Zhou H. & Lu J. (2015). Pollution Characteristics and Health Risk Assessment of
Heavy Metals in Street Dusts from Different Functional Areas in Beijing, China. Ecotoxicology and
Environmental Safety, 112 : 186-192.
36. WHO (2017). Guidelines for drinking-water quality: Fourth Edition incorporating the first additive. Geneva.
Licence : CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO: 223-429.

Appendices:-
Table I:-Characteristics of households surveyed.
Characteristics n = 200 households Percent (%)
Gender
Femme 108 54
Homme 92 46
Number of residents per household
< 10 67 33.5
10-30 106 53
> 30 27 13.5
Consumers under 5 years old
Oui 113 56.5
Non 87 43.5

Table II:-Unit weights and maximum guidelines values.


Parameters Units weights (wi) Guidelines values
T 4 30
pH 4 8.5
CE 4 1000
NO3- 5 50
NO2- 5 3
Cr 5 0.05
Pb2+ 5 0.01
Ni2+ 5 0.07
SO42- 4 250
NH4+ 4 1.5
Ca2+ 2 100
Mg2+ 2 50
Fe 3 0.3
Mn2+ 3 0.1

Table III:-Chemical risk assessment criteria.


Parameters Children under 5 years old Adults References
Quantity of water ingested by day (Q)
1 2 WHO (2017)
(L/d)
Body weight (PC) (kg) 10 60 WHO (2017)
Reference dose of Cr VI (mg/kg/d) 0.0009 0.0009 US EPA (2024)

Table IV:-Significant variation in physico-chemical parameters.


Well water Spring water
Rainy season Dry season Rainy season Dry season WHO 2017
T 28.99a 28.45b 29.48a 28.32b 25
a a
pH 5.62 5.44 5.33a 5.13a 6.5-8.5
a a
CE 222.49 246.51 74.86a 79.50a

1004
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 12(12), 993-1006

NO3- 2.36b 23.49a 1.330b 11.711a 50


- a a
NO2 0.06 0.13 0.019a 0.051a 3
+ b a
NH4 0.43 1.60 0.353b 0.703a 1.5
2- a b
SO4 13.37 9.13 9.200a 0.889b 250
2+ a b
Ni 1.38 0.19 0.174a 0.178a 0.07
2+ a a
Pb 0.01 0.01 0.010b 0.012a 0.01
a a
Cr 0.18 0.15 0.664a 0.152b 0.05
b a
Fe 0.12 0.53 0.663a 0.630b 0.3
2+ a a
Mn 0.05 0.05 0.050a 0.025b 0.1
2+ a b
Ca 93.35 1.93 88.300a 0.881b 100
2+ a b
Mg 56.71 2.68 8.583a 3.114b 50
a
high value ;blow value ; a ano significant variation ; a bsignificant variation

Table VII:-Concentration values for Cr VI and HQ from different water sources.


Rainy season Dry season
Well/ Springs CrVI (mg/L) HQ_Children HQ_Adults CrVI (mg/L) HQ_Children HQ_Adults
P1 0,04 4,72 1,57 0,09 10,17 3,39
P2 0,03 3,65 1,22 0,01 0,91 0,30
P3 0,04 4,26 1,42 0,04 4,65 1,55
P4 0,02 2,73 0,91 0,02 2,30 0,77
P5 0,05 5,94 1,98 0,05 5,01 1,67
P6 0,04 4,41 1,47 0,01 0,95 0,32
P7 0,07 7,31 2,44 0,07 7,40 2,47
P8 0,06 7,16 2,39 0,08 9,10 3,03
P9 0,05 6,09 2,03 0,02 2,65 0,88
P10 0,05 5,33 1,78 0,05 5,73 1,91
P11 0,05 5,33 1,78 0,00 0,00 0,00
P12 0,04 3,95 1,32 0,06 6,90 2,30
P13 0,04 4,72 1,57 0,11 12,24 4,08
P14 0,05 6,09 2,03 0,03 2,92 0,97
P15 0,06 7,01 2,34 0,04 3,92 1,31
P16 0,06 6,24 2,08 0,01 1,61 0,54
P17 0,05 5,78 1,93 0,03 3,86 1,29
P18 0,06 7,01 2,34 0,00 0,00 0,00
P19 0,07 8,07 2,69 0,06 6,50 2,17
P20 0,05 5,63 1,88 0,05 5,57 1,86
P21 0,06 6,39 2,13 0,06 6,44 2,15
P22 0,05 5,48 1,83 0,00 0,21 0,07
P23 0,07 7,92 2,64 0,04 4,72 1,57
P24 0,08 8,53 2,84 0,08 9,17 3,06
P25 0,05 5,48 1,83 0,02 1,80 0,60
P26 0,07 7,31 2,44 0,10 11,53 3,84
P27 0,05 5,94 1,98 0,08 9,00 3,00
P28 0,05 5,33 1,78 0,06 6,58 2,19
P29 0,05 6,09 2,03 0,03 3,41 1,14
P30 0,07 7,92 2,64 0,03 3,58 1,19
mean 0.05 5.93 1.97 0.04 4.96 1.65
S1 0,18 19,70 6,57 0,09 10,04 3,35
S2 0,22 24,26 8,09 0,02 1,91 0,64
S3 0,21 23,50 7,83 0,04 4,87 1,62
S4 0,21 23,12 7,71 0,03 3,85 1,28
S5 0,21 23,88 7,96
S6 0,17 19,32 6,44 0,08 8,99 3,00
S7 0,24 26,16 8,72 0,01 0,70 0,23
S8 0,18 20,46 6,82 0,06 6,51 2,17

1005
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 12(12), 993-1006

S9 0,17 19,32 6,44 0,07 7,94 2,65


S10 0,19 21,60 7,20 0,01 0,94 0,31
mean 0.19 22.13 7.38 0.05 5.08 1.69

1006

You might also like