The Role of the Theonyms in the Alphabets
The Role of the Theonyms in the Alphabets
Alphabets
Joannes Richter
Index 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Transcription of the
Ugaritic alphabet ʾa b g ḫ d h w z ḥ ṭ y k š l m ḏ n ẓ s ʿ p ṣ q r s ġ t ʾi ʾu s2
Abstract
Most of alphabets should be interpreted as a neutral composition without any readable sub-string in
the alphabetical order. In contrast the 2-dimensional alphabetical table may display one or more 5-
letter theonyms, in which the reader might identify a divine name of a sky-god, respectively similar
theonyms.
The first theonym may be interpreted as the name of the inventor of the alphabet, who in Egyptian
language is named Djehuty, ḎḤWTY (or ṢḪUTY), respectively Theuth or Thot in Greek. The
introduction of the alphabet may have been dated by the reign of the pharaoh Thutmosis I, whose
name is interpreted as "Thoth is born". Thutmose I's reign is generally dated to 1506–1493 BC.
In the Greek alphabet the virtues “Wisdom” (METIS) and “Justice” (ΘEMIS) may be identified as
the consorts of the sky-god DjEUS in the 2-dimensional alphabet, in which the letter Digamma “Ϝ”
is skipped around 500 BCE1. The removal of the Digamma spelled the virtues “Wisdom” from
ϜETIS to METIS and “Justice” ΘEϜIS to ΘEMIS.
In the Futhark runes the similar virtues “Wisdom” and “Justice” are spelled “WIT(ES)”,
respectively “TIW(ES)”. The theonym of the (Gothic) sky-god is TIEWS. The theonym TIEWS
contains the same letters as “WITES” respectively “TIWES”. Obviously the Futhark runes had been
based on the Greek names DjEUS, METIS, ΘEMIS.
1 Das Digamma (griechisch δίγαμμα, Majuskel Ϝ/Ͷ, Minuskel ϝ/ͷ) war ursprünglich der sechste Buchstabe des
griechischen Alphabets, kam aber um etwa 500 v. Chr. außer Gebrauch. (source: Digamma)
A Pentagrammaton for the word Theuth
An analysis of the composition of the 5 different categories for the 5 letters in the name Theut may
be documented in this chapter.
The symbols of the pentagrammaton are defined (from the left to the right) as follows:
Table 2 Interpretation of the hieroglyph symbols in the word Djehuti (ḎḪWTJ) – Theuth
The analysis of the Egyptian word Djehuti (ḎḪWTJ) – Theuth suggests that the Ugaritic alphabet
may be derived from an Egyptian alphabet, in which the phonetic units already had been
categorized in 5 classes: dental, guttural, labial, lingual and palatal.
The words may be 5 symbols which represent these 5 categories, which may refer to the inventor
Theut, but may also may refer to the set of the points of articulations.
The Flag represents a determination for the names of gods and is not included in the
pentagrammaton.
2 Discovering Egyptian Hieroglyphs – A practical Guide; Karl-Theodor Zauzich, translated by Ann Macy Roth (1992)
The derivation of the 2-dimensional alphabet
The derivation of the 2-dimensional alphabet is based on the rules of Rabbi Saadia Gaon (892 –
942)
The “Saadia”-composition of Rabbi Saadia Gaon (892 – 942) strictly follows the standard Hebrew
alphabet. In the Sefer Yetzirah the “short”, “long” and “Gra” versions of the alphabetical order
deviate from the standard alphabetical order:
A1- B2- G3- D4- H5- V6- Z7- Ch8- T9- Y10- K11- L12- M13- N14- S15- O16- P17- Tz18- Q19- R20- Sh21- Th22
We may also compose a 2-dimensional array for this alphabetical order, which displays theonyms in
the 2nd row:
row lingual palatal labial guttural dental
5 Taw Th22 Shin Sh21 2
4 Nun N14 Qoph Q19 Pe P17 Ayin O16 Resh R20 5
3 Lamedh L12 Kaph K11 Mem M13 Heth Ch8 Tsade Tz18 5
Table 3 The display of the theonyms Y10-V6-H5 and T9-Y10-V6-H5-S15 in the Hebrew alphabet
The rows and furrows represent the horizontal, respectively vertical coordinates for a 2-dimensional
acre. The rows and furrows may be sketched in the 2-dimensional acre of letters:
Furrow Furrow Furrow Furrow Furrow
Lingual Palatal Guttural Labial Dental
Row 5 Tau T22 Upsilon U/Y23 Sigma S21 3
Row 4 Nu N14 Qoppa K19 Omicron O16 Pi Π17 Rho P20 5
Row 3 Lambda Λ12 Kappa Ch11 Eta H8 Mu M13 San S18 5
Row 2 Theta Θ9 Iota I10 Epsilon Ε5 Digamma Ϝ/V6 Xi Ξ15 5
Row 1 Delta Δ4 Gamma Γ3 Alpha A1 Beta B2 Zeta Z7 5
sum 5 4 4 5 5 23
Hebrew 22
גב א כ י ט ח ז ו הד מ ל נ שר ק צ פ ע ס ת
YHV ו ה י
Alphabēton
ἀλφάβητον
23 A B Γ ΔΕ F Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ Ο Π S K Ρ Σ Τ Y
ΘIEUΞ E U Θ I Ξ
Old-Greek 21
A B Γ ΔΕ Υ Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν (s) Ο Π (s) q Ρ Σ Τ
Classic Greek 21
A B Γ ΔΕ Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν (s) Ο Π (s) Ρ Σ Τ Y X Ω
Numbers 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21-26
(c) Ϝ I V,U,W,
Latin 1 26 A BG DE Z H (Þ) K L M N (s) O P (s) Q R S T X,Y
V J
ÞIEUS E U (Þ) I S
Ϝ G I V,U,W,
Latin 2 26 A BC DE H (Þ) K L M N O P Q R S T X,Y, Z
V (Z) J
GUÞES E U G (Þ) S
V,U,W,
French 26 A BC DE F GH IJ K L M N O P Q R S T X,Y, Z
ÞIEU E U (Þ) I
Table 5 Ugaritic abecedaria (1) of the "Northern Semitic order" (27-30 letters)
(categorized according to the comments of Rabbi Saadia Gaon's commentary)
The derivation of theonyms from the alphabet
The modification of the alphabets may also modify the displays of the theonyms. Zeus' consorts
Metis (Wisdom) and Themis (Justice) are spelled with an “M” instead of the digamma “F”.
The 2-dimensional signaries of the runes seem to be composed by the Greek traders, who visited
and advised the Celtic leaders in their study of mythology and basics of scripture.
Obviously the contacts of Greek traders also influenced the introduction of the Lydian, Armenian
and Georgian languages, which is described in the following examples:
The pantheon of the ancient Armenians included Tir, who was the patron god of writing and
science. Tir (TIR, Armenian: Տիր) is the god of written language, schooling, rhetoric, wisdom, and
the arts in Armenian mythology.[1][2]
In the essay Notes to the Armenian and Georgian Alphabets the display of the Armenian theonym is
derived as follows: Թ-Ի-Ֆ-Ե-Ժ ( Θ9-I20-W-Ε5-Ž10).
The following European alphabets seemed to be derived from the Ugaritic alphabet and revealed at
the 2nd, 3rd or 4th row the theonyms ΘIAVS, respectively in the Futhark TIÆWS (abbreviated to
TIW) and in the Ogham signary TIΕU, which all resembled to the name of the PIE-sky-god
“*DIAUS”.
Fundamental words such as divine names (such as DJOUS), basic persons (such as FAÐIR and
MÓÐIR) and virtues (such as METIS “wisdom” and ThEMIS “justice”) are composed as 5-letter
words, which contain all 5 categories.
7 Old Georgian
8 Fundamentals in the Name-Giving for the Days of the Week
The 2-dimensional pattern of the Younger ϝYÞAR-signary
The Younger ϝYÞAR(k) signary is an abbreviated version of the elder Futhark. In contrast to the
standard Futhark signaries the Younger ϝYÞAR(k) display the theonym (ϝYÞAR) at the first row of
the 2-dimensional table. This feature allows the alphabetical designers to modify the signary from
the 6th character. From the 6th letter all letters may be removed or replaced at lib. We may compare
the following 4 runic signaries:
1. Elder Futhark (24 Runes, 2e century AD)
2. Younger Futhark (16 Runes, 7e century AD)
3. Staveless Runes or Hälsinger Runes (15 Runes, 7e – 9e century AD)9
4. the dotted symbols in the nordic Runes.
5. The Anglo-Saxon runes (34 Runes, 5th through 11th centuries AD)
In the Staveless Runes (15 letters) we may identify the missing of the letter A, which disturbs the
theonym's pattern.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
1 Symbol ᚠᚢ ᚦ ᚨ ᚱ ᚲ ᚷ ᚹ ᚺ ᚾ ᛁ ᛃ ᛈ ᛇ ᛉ ᛊ ᛏ ᛒ ᛖ ᛗ ᛚ ᛜ ᛞ ᛟ
2 Elder Futhark F U ÞARKGWH N I J P Ï Z S T B E M L Ŋ D O
3 Younger Futhark F U ÞARK H N I Æ S T B M L R
4 Staveless Runes F U Þ RK H N I A S T B M L R
5 Younger ϝYÞAR(k) F Y ÞARK H N I Æ S T B M L R
Table 6 The Futhark Signaries
Fig. 3 Overview of the theonyms in the display of the Latin, Futhark and Ogham signaries
9 The Staveless runes were the climax of the simplification process in the evolution of runic alphabets that had started
when the Elder Futhark was superseded by the Younger Futhark.[1] (bron (Wikipedia): Hälsinge runes)
10 The 2-Dimensional Alphabets' Compendium and The Synchronization of the Germanic and Greek Pantheon
The Runa ABC (1611) of Johannes Bureus (1568–1652)
The Runa ABC (1611) of Johannes Bureus (1568–1652) was the first Swedish alphabet book and its
purpose was to teach the runic alphabet in 17th century Sweden.
## 1 2/2/2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 / 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Younger
Futhark ᚠ ᚡᚢᚤᚣ - ᚦ ᚧ ᚭ - - ᚱ - ᚴ - - ᚼ ᚾ ᛁ ᛂ ᛅ - ᛋ- ᛐ ᛏ - ᛒ ᚭ ᛚ ᚫ ᛘ
Final
symbol ᛦ ᚿ
Vowels U YÅ OÅĄ I E A
F V V Y Å Þ Ð ðð O Å Ą R R R C G Q H N N J E A S ss ſ T tt D B P L ll M
Trans-
literation Gh D P mm
Ch
The digital facsimile Runa ABC does not describe a 15-symbols alphabet, but lists a number of
variants for several runes. Especially the second rune “Ur” ᚢ, ᚤ, ᚣ represents a universal “joker”,
which represents 3 categories (U, Y, Å). In the British Futhorc the rune is named “Ȳr” (Y).
A second rune symbol “Ȳr” (Y) allows us to interpret the first 5 runes in the Futhorc signary as
ϝYᚦOR or ϝYᚦÅR (labial, palatal, lingual, guttural and dental).
In the younger or medieval Futhark a trailing rune (ᛦ, stupmadr, R) is added11.
Transformng the Runa ABC and the stupmadr ᛦ into the corresponding 2-dimensional table we may
identify:
• in the 1st row the word “father” (ϝYÞĄR) and
• in the 3rd row the word “Mother” (MITAR )
Labial Palatal Lingual Guttural Dental Runes Latinized Old Norse English
4 ᛚ (L) ᛚ
3 ᛘ (M) ᛁ (I) ᛐ (T) ᛅ (A) ᛦ (R) ᛘᛁᛐᛅᛦ MITAR móðir - MÓÐIR Mother
2 ᛒ (B) ᚴ (C) ᚾ (N) ᚼ (H) ᛋ (S) ᛒᚴᚾᚼᛋ BCNHS
1 ᚠ (ϝ) ᚤ (Y) ᚦ (Th) ᚭ (O) ᚱ (R) ᚠᚤᚦᚭᚱ ϝYÞĄR ᚠᛅᚦᛁᛦ (faþiʀ) FAþIR Father
Table 9 2-dimensional table for the “Runa ABC"
in the essay (1611) of Johannes Bureus
Indices ## 1 2 3 - 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 - - 15 16 - 17 18 19 20 21-26
(c) Ϝ I V,U,W,
ABGDZ-Latin 1 26 A B G D E Z H (Þ) K L M N O P (s) Q R S T
U J X,Y, Z
Ϝ G I V,U,W,
ABCDR-Latin 2 26 A B C D E H (Þ) K L M N O P QR S T
U (Z) J X,Y, Z
Table 11 The transit from ABGDZ- to the ABCDR-Alphabet
The theonym G7-U6-(Þ)-Ε5-S19 is defined as the God - “Invoked One” (Proto-Indo-European/ǵʰutós).
#
Pentagram P Information Definitions Language
1. G
*GUDAS P God - “Invoked One”, derived from ǵʰutós* God Proto-
*GUDAN - Germanic
2. G
*ǴHUTÓS P God - “Invoked One” God PI-European
(Proto-Indo-European/ǵʰutós)
12 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Z#Latin
13 The 2-Dimensional Alphabets' Compendium
The ego-pronouns as cores in the theonyms14
In a number of European alphabets the ego-pronouns IEU, JOU, JAU, etc. represent the core of
displayed theonyms DIEU(S), DIOUS, DJAUS.
The original theonyms of the Latin alphabet remained intact: I10-Ε5-V6 (and in a still symbolically
intact pattern Þ9-I10-Ε5-V6-S15), because the lost letters were deleted, but their shadow position
could not really be removed.
The theonym I10-Ε5-V6 nay be interpreted as a core for DIEU (Þ9-I10-Ε5-V6.), or DIEU(S)in the
Latin alphabet.
row lingual palatal guttural labial dental
5 T20 X24 Y25 U21, V22, W23 S19 7
4 N14 Q17 O15 P16 R18 5
3 L12 K11 H8 M13 (Ts) 4
23 Patois of Villar-St-Pancrace : Personal pronouns: Cas sujet Cas régime atone tonique direct indirect
Sg. 1°p a (l’) iòu më, m’ iòu 2°p tü, t’ të, t’ tü 3°p M u(l), al ei(l) së lu ei F eilo la eilo N o, ul, la - lu - Pl. 1°p nû*
nû* 2°p òû* vû* vû* 3°p M î(z) së lû* iè F eilâ (eilaz) lâ* eilâ
24 See the dialect's lexicon : Lexique de mots en patois
Two vowel Pronouns
In analogy to the two-vowel pronouns most of these two-vowel pronouns have been designed to
match a core in the corresponding divine name, e.g. the Portuguese Ego-pronoun eu which has been
included in the divine name Deus. These mechanisms suggest that the progressive abbreviations
may have occurred in the pronouns and in the divine names simulataneously. The two-vowel
pronouns are concentrating amongst the borders of the Mediterranean Sea.
Comparing the "Vallatese" Ego-pronoun eje to the Greek/Roman "Ego"-pronoun we should
consider a original transposition from Ejo (Ego) -> eje and in Napulitano-version: je.
Language Ego-pronoun Tu-pronoun We-pronoun God
Portuguese eu Deus
Romanian eu tu noi Zeu,
Dumnezeu
Galician eu tu, tí Deus
Sicilian iu Tu nuàutri Diu
(Iu-piter)
Interlingua io tu
Gascon (Occitan) jo
Neapolitan io tu nuje Dió
"Vallatese" - Irpinian eje to nuje
Napulitano je tu
Spanish yo tú, usted nosotros Dios
Aragonese yo
Catalan jo tu Deus, Déu
Italian ió Tu Dió
Vulgar Latin eo Deus
Sardinian eo Déu
French je Tu nous Dieu
Ladin (Gherdëina) ie
34 Source: I Am that I Am
35 E - of the Word Ei Engraven Over the Gate of Apollos Temple at Delphi
Summary
Most of alphabets should be interpreted as a neutral composition without any readable sub-string in
the alphabetical order. In contrast the 2-dimensional alphabetical table may display one or more 5-
letter theonyms, in which the reader might identify a divine name of a sky-god, respectively similar
theonyms.
The first theonym may be interpreted as the name of the inventor of the alphabet, who in Egyptian
language is named Djehuty, ḎḤWTY (or ṢḪUTY), respectively Theuth or Thot in Greek. The
introduction of the alphabet may have been dated by the reign of the pharaoh Thutmosis I, whose
name is interpreted as "Thoth is born". Thutmose I's reign is generally dated to 1506–1493 BC.
In the Greek alphabet the virtues “Wisdom” (METIS) and “Justice” (ΘEMIS) may be identified as
the consorts of the sky-god DjEUS in the 2-dimensional alphabet, in which the letter Digamma “Ϝ”
is skipped around 500 BCE36. The removal of the Digamma spelled the virtues “Wisdom” from
ϜETIS to METIS and “Justice” ΘEϜIS to ΘEMIS.
In the Futhark runes the similar virtues “Wisdom” and “Justice” are spelled “WIT(ES)”,
respectively “TIW(ES)”. The theonym of the (Gothic) sky-god is TIEWS. The theonym TIEWS
contains the same letters as “WITES” respectively “TIWES”. Obviously the Futhark runes had been
based on the Greek names DjEUS, METIS, ΘEMIS.
The Lydian alphabet is closely related to the other alphabets of Asia Minor as well as to the Greek
alphabet. It contains letters for 26 sounds. In the Lydian alphabet the letter Θ is missing, which
resulted in a replacement of the “L” instead of the lingual letter “Θ”. Therefore LEWS or LEVS
was a Lydian equivalent of the Greek god Zeus (ΖΕΥΣ) & a Phrygian god TIWS.
ASTUAC may be an Anatolian compound of the form *Aššu-TIWAZ (“good deity/lord,
good Sun-god, good dawn/day or the like”), for whose constituents see Hittite [script
needed] (aššu-), Luwian (wa-a-šu-uš /wāsus/, “good”) and Luwian (TIWAZ, “Sun-god”).
In the essay Notes to the Armenian and Georgian Alphabets the display of the Armenian theonym is
derived as follows: Թ-Ի-Ֆ-Ե-Ժ ( Θ9-I20-W-Ε5-Ž10).
The Old Georgian theonym T9I10W6E5Zh18 seems to correspond with the theonym
Tʽ9I20W5aΕ5Ž10 in the Armenian alphabet.
The introduction of the theonym “God” may have been based on the replacement of the letter “Z”
from the alphabetical 7th location (in the alphabet “Latin 1”) to the end of the alphabet “Latin 2”.
The letter “G” replaced the letter “Z” at the location 7.
The Futhark signary represents a remarkable composition of theonyms for a triad of the Greek
theonyms (Zeus, Metis, Themis and the word “father”).
The Younger ϝYÞAR(k) signary is an abbreviated version of the elder Futhark. In contrast to the
standard Futhark signaries the Younger ϝYÞAR(k) display the theonym (ϝYÞAR) at the first row of
the 2-dimensional table. The theonym ϝYÞAR may be interpreted as the Sanskrit “PITAR”
(“Father”). The words T,Æ,I,W,S, W,I,T,Æ,S, T,I,W,Æ,S are interpreted the Gothic sky-god,
wisdom, to wit or “wizzard”, respectively “Tiw”, the Germanic god of “justice”.
In the Younger ϝYÞAR(k) signary the first row displays the “Father” (ϝYÞAR). The third row
displays as a theonym the word “Mother” (MITAR ).
In a number of European alphabets the ego-pronouns IEU, JOU, JAU, etc. represent the core of
displayed theonyms.
36 Das Digamma (griechisch δίγαμμα, Majuskel Ϝ/Ͷ, Minuskel ϝ/ͷ) war ursprünglich der sechste Buchstabe des
griechischen Alphabets, kam aber um etwa 500 v. Chr. außer Gebrauch. (source: Digamma)
Contents
Abstract ................................................................................................................................................1
A Pentagrammaton for the word Theuth..............................................................................................2
Analysis of the hieroglyphic name Theuth or Thoth.......................................................................2
The derivation of the 2-dimensional alphabet .....................................................................................3
Example of the Rows and Furrows in the 2-dimensional Acre of Letters.......................................3
The derivatives of the Ugaritic alphabet...............................................................................................4
Djehuti (Thoth) as a master for various pentagrammatons..............................................................4
The derivation of theonyms from the alphabet.....................................................................................5
Notes to the Lydian Alphabet ..........................................................................................................5
Notes to the Armenian Alphabet......................................................................................................5
Notes to the Georgian Alphabet.......................................................................................................6
The other derivatives of the Ugaritic alphabet.................................................................................6
The 2-dimensional pattern of the Younger ϝYÞAR-signary............................................................7
The Etymology of the theonym “God”............................................................................................9
The ego-pronouns as cores in the theonyms.......................................................................................10
Three vowel Pronouns...................................................................................................................11
Two vowel Pronouns.....................................................................................................................13
One vowel Pronouns......................................................................................................................14
Summary.............................................................................................................................................17