0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views25 pages

Celine Pearn Pearn Celine-1446601-Arch8511 Part-A 455846 721078036 PDF

The document is a grading report for Celine Pearn's submission for ARCH8511 Part A, submitted on April 4, 2018, with a final grade of 80 out of 100. It includes detailed feedback on various sections such as the introduction, analysis, marketing mix, report quality, and executive summary, each evaluated against a rubric. The report highlights strengths and areas for improvement in the submission.

Uploaded by

assignme.edu
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views25 pages

Celine Pearn Pearn Celine-1446601-Arch8511 Part-A 455846 721078036 PDF

The document is a grading report for Celine Pearn's submission for ARCH8511 Part A, submitted on April 4, 2018, with a final grade of 80 out of 100. It includes detailed feedback on various sections such as the introduction, analysis, marketing mix, report quality, and executive summary, each evaluated against a rubric. The report highlights strengths and areas for improvement in the submission.

Uploaded by

assignme.edu
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 25

PEARN_Celine-1446601-

ARCH8511_PART-A
by Celine Pearn

FILE 74432_CELINE_PEARN_PEARN_CELINE-1446601-ARCH8511_PART -
A_455846_721078036.PDF
T IME SUBMIT T ED 04-APR-2018 06:20PM (UT C+1200) WORD COUNT 6378
SUBMISSION ID 940861499 CHARACT ER COUNT 34675
PEARN_Celine-1446601-ARCH8511_PART-A
GRADEMARK REPORT

FINAL GRADE GENERAL COMMENTS

80
Instructor

/100
PAGE 1

PAGE 2

PAGE 3

PAGE 4

PAGE 5

PAGE 6

PAGE 7

PAGE 8

PAGE 9

PAGE 10

PAGE 11

PAGE 12

PAGE 13

PAGE 14

PAGE 15

PAGE 16

PAGE 17

PAGE 18

PAGE 19

PAGE 20

PAGE 21
RUBRIC: PBM PART A 48 / 6 0

INT RODUCT ION 12 / 15


T ABLE OF CONT ENT S INT RODUCT ION MISSION ST AT EMENT CORE VALUES MGMT ST RUCT URE &
DIRECT OR PROFILES (15 marks)

A - EXCELLENT Very well thought out mission statement supported by core values, management
(15) structure and staf f selection. No internal logical errors. All parts support each other.
Section completed. No f urther inf ormation is necessary.

B - GOOD Mission Statement mostly supported by core values, management structure and staf f
(12) selection. Few or minor internal logical errors. Section substantially completed.

C - ACCEPTABLE All parts completed. Mission Statement somewhat supported by core values,
(9) management structure and staf f selection. Some internal logical errors.

D - INADEQUATE Not all parts completed. Mission Statement not really supported by core values,
(6) management structure and staf f selection. Internal logical errors.

E - MISSING Completely of f -track or did not submit.


(4.50)

ANALYSIS 15 / 20
SWOT ANALYSIS MARKET SEGMENT AT ION T ARGET MARKET COMPET IT VE ANALYSIS POSIT IONING
(20 marks)

A - EXCELLENT Credible analysis, excellent amount of research undertaken. Logical market


(20) segmentation carried out. T arget market is viable, Competitive analysis thorough,
positioning undertaken using core values. Customers identif ied.

B - GOOD Credible analysis, good amount of research undertaken. Market segmentation carried
(15) out. T arget market is viable, Competitive analysis thorough, positioning undertaken
using mostly core values. Customers identif ied.

C - ACCEPTABLE Credible analysis, adequate amount of research undertaken. Market segmentation


(12) done. T arget market could be viable, Competitive analysis completed, positioning
undertaken using some core values. Customers mostly identif ied.

D - INADEQUATE Not credible analysis, inadequate amount of research undertaken. T arget market not
(9) viable. Competitive analysis incomplete, positioning undertaken not using core values.
Customers not identif ied.

E - MISSING Completely of f -track or did not submit.


(6)

MARKET ING MIX 11 / 15


MARKET ING MIX Product, Price, Place, Promotion, Physical Evidence, People, Process (15 marks)

A - EXCELLENT Marketing Mix complete and logically f its within the mission statement and core value
(15) f ramework. Internal consistency with the SWOT analysis and positioning statements.

B - GOOD Marketing Mix complete and mostly f its within the mission statement and core value
(11) f ramework. Some internal consistency with the SWOT analysis and positioning
statements.

C - ACCEPTABLE Marketing Mix substantially complete and somewhat f its within the mission statement
(8.50) and core value f ramework.

D - INADEQUATE Marketing Mix not complete and doesn’t f it within the mission statement and core
(6) value f ramework.

E - MISSING Completely of f -track or did not submit.


(3)

REPORT QUALIT 5/5


REPORT QUALIT Y (5 marks)

A - EXCELLENT Prof essionally presented. Very f ew writing errors.


(5)

B - GOOD Well Presented. Some writing errors that no not impede comprehension.
(3.50)

C - ACCEPTABLE Adequately Presented. Errors do not impede comprehension.


(2.50)

D - INADEQUATE Inadequately presented. Errors can impede comprehension.


(1.50)

E - MISSING Many Errors that impede comprehension.


(1)

EXEC SUMMARY 5/5


Executive Summary (5 marks)

A - EXCELLENT Fully incorporates all relevant inf ormation, 1 page.


(5)

B - GOOD Incorporates most relevant inf ormation


(3.50)

C - ACCEPTABLE Incorporates relevant inf ormation – over 1 page.


(2.50)

D - INADEQUATE Relevant inf ormation missing.


(1.50)

E - MISSING Of f -track or DNS.


(1)

You might also like