环境温度变化对涂装性能的影响
环境温度变化对涂装性能的影响
Abstract
Effect of environmental temperature variations on mechanical integrity and protective properties of coated metal systems has been
discussed based on stress development and the cumulative damage model. The effect of temperature cycling between 20 and 55 ◦ C, and
−20 and 20 ◦ C on the durability of different paint coating systems on steel was investigated. Using the impedance spectroscopy technique
changes of parameters of coatings submitted to thermal treatment have been monitored. Results of impedance measurements show a
negative influence of temperature variations on coating protective properties.
© 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Environmental; Impedance; Coating
1. Introduction rial due to its properties has the ability to respond to stress by
molecular rearrangement. Temperature- and time-dependent
Organic coatings have been used for a long time to pro- behaviour of polymeric material systems subjected to
tect metals against corrosion in atmospheric conditions. The thermal changes is well known [6,7]. Below glass transition
fundamental property of natural environment conditions is temperature (Tg ) spontaneous changes occur in polymer
variability, mainly connected with sun operation and mete- amorphous materials. These processes are ascribed to con-
orological phenomena. Coating systems on metal undergo formational changes of the polymer backbone and are related
cyclic thermal loading connected with temperature fluctu- to physical ageing. As a result the density and elastic modu-
ations in the 24 h cycle and seasonal cycle (Fig. 1) [1]. lus of the polymer increase, the impact strength, fracture en-
This aspect does not reflect conditions of accelerated weath- ergy decrease; creep and stress relaxation rates decrease [8].
ering tests or formulation of new coating products. Usu- A number of phenomenological theories have been proposed
ally, testing of coating system is carried out at constant to describe the time-dependent changes of physical proper-
temperature or at two levels of temperature in cyclic tests ties [6,8,9]. Loss of coating ability to relax stress is the effect
[2,3]. of physical ageing and chemical degradation. As a result,
Environmental temperature changes affect coated metal the mechanical damage to the coating occurs (microcracks)
in two ways: by inducing thermal stresses in the system and as well as delamination from the metallic base [10–12].
by changing the mechanical properties of the viscoelastic Subsequently, during cyclic temperature changes propa-
coating. Thermal stresses result from mismatch of the co- gation of defects and delamination on the metal/coating
efficients of thermal expansion of the coating and substrate interface occur. In this way protective properties of the
(e.g., for an epoxy resin from 45 × 10−6 to 65 × 10−6 ◦ C−1 , coating connected with the barrier function and adhesion
for alkyds 55×10−6 to 60×10−6 ◦ C−1 [4] and for the metal to the substrate deteriorate [13]. Therefore, the lifetime
base: steel 16×10−6 ◦ C−1 , zinc 23×10−6 ◦ C−1 , aluminium of the coating system to a significant degree is connected
23×10−6 ◦ C−1 [5]). Temperature determines both the stress with capability to resist the forming and relaxation of stress
level and the rate of viscoelastic response of the coating to without mechanical damage to the coating and the coating/
stress level. In the initial period of exposure the coating mate- metal interface.
A need exists to predict rapidly and simply the service
∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +48-58-347-2483; fax: +48-58-347-1092. life of organic coatings on metal [3,14,15]. Successful pre-
E-mail address: [email protected] (A. Miszczyk). diction of long-term performance of organic coatings in
0300-9440/02/$ – see front matter © 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 3 0 0 - 9 4 4 0 ( 0 2 ) 0 0 1 8 8 - 1
50 A. Miszczyk, K. Darowicki / Progress in Organic Coatings 46 (2003) 49–54
2. Experimental
Table 1
Mean maximum and mean minimum temperatures for each month of
exposure
Month
tmin (◦ C) 8 10 13 13 14 9
tmax (◦ C) 18 21 23 21 23 16
Fig. 3. Course of temperature changes of samples with an acrylic coating. Two cases were considered for coated sample exposure:
(a) temperature changes above 0 ◦ C,
climate for a period of 6 months, from the beginning of (b) temperature changes when minimum temperature is be-
April to the end of September, 2000. On the basis of re- low 0 ◦ C and maximum temperature is above 0 ◦ C.
gional meteorological data the mean lowest and mean high-
est temperatures were determined for each month (Table 1). In the first case temperature programme was controlled
Samples taken for laboratory tests were subjected to ther- by computerised ‘home made’ set up using typical propor-
mal treatment in accordance with Fig. 3, performing during tional, integral and derivative (PID) arrangement. The sam-
one day a programme of temperature changes characteristic ple was heated and cooled according to programmed course
for 1 month; hence 30 or 31 shocks of parameters in accor- between 20 and 55 ◦ C. The thick epoxy coating system on
dance with Table 1. During remaining time, samples were steel was immersed in 3% NaCl and exposed to temperature
stored at 20 ◦ C. Simultaneously, two parts of coating samples variations according to Fig. 5. The sample was kept at 20 ◦ C
were submitted to thermal interaction, one immersed in so- in 3% NaCl during 2 weeks before thermal treatment to ob-
lution simulating atmospheric conditions: 0.3 g NaCl +0.7 g tain stable state of investigated system. Impedance measure-
Na2 SO4 /dm3 , and second one without presence of solution ments were carried out in the frequency range 100–1 kHz
(as presented schematically in Fig. 4). Impedance spectrum every 2 min during dynamic temperature changes. Using
measurements were performed before and after natural and a software programme [23], coating electrical parameters
laboratory exposures. Samples exposed with no immersion were determined on the basis of obtained impedance spectra.
were immersed in 0.3 g NaCl + 0.7 g Na2 SO4 /dm3 for 48 h The freezing–thawing cycle was performed between +20 ◦ C
before impedance measurements. (4 h) and −20 ◦ C (20 h).
spectroscopy. Basing on these results, one can propose [3] B.P. Alblas, J.J. Kettenis, PCE 5 (2) (2000) 49.
the following mechanism of accelerated degradation, in [4] J. Antoniewicz, Properties of Dielectrics, WNT, Warsaw, 1971 (in
comparison to isothermal exposure. Temperature changes Polish).
[5] Mechanic Hand-book, vol. 1, WNT, Warsaw, 1984 (in Polish).
induce the development of hygrothermal, thermal or me- [6] I.M. Hodge, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 169 (1994) 211.
chanical stresses in the coating in wet, dry or frosty con- [7] K.D. Dorkenoo, P.H. Pfromm, J. Polym. Sci. 37 (1999) 2239.
ditions, respectively. In spite of relaxation processes and [8] W.J. Davis, R.A. Pethrick, Polymer 39 (1998) 255.
depending on cycling speed, the average magnitude of [9] J.M.G. Cowie, R. Ferguson, S. Harris, I.J. McEwen, Polymer 39
stresses increases. As adhesive bond strength diminishes, (1998) 4393.
[10] L. Xiaowei, H.A. Hristov, A.F. Yee, D.W. Gidley, Polymer 36 (1995)
due ageing of coating material, approaches critical value of 759.
the local cohesive stress and adhesive damages occur. This [11] M.E. Nichols, C.A. Darr, C.A. Smith, M.D. Thouless, E.R. Fischer,
contributes to coating degradation by creation of conductive Polym. Degrad. Stab. 60 (1998) 291.
pathways in the coating as cracks fill with electrolyte and/or [12] H. Lee, S. Krishnaswamy, Trans. ASME 67 (2000) 444.
local delamination. Each further temperature changes can [13] T. Nguyen, J.B. Hubbard, J.M. Pommersheim, J. Coat. Technol. 68
(1996) 45.
cause propagation of defects and their accumulation over [14] M. Kendig, Jeanjaquet, R. Brown, F. Thomas, J. Coat. Technol. 68
time. Macroscopic failure occurs when a specific limit of (1996) 39.
accumulated damages is reached. Generally, the effect of [15] G.P. Bierwagen, L. He, J. Li, L. Ellingson, D.E. Tallman, Prog. Org.
environmental temperature variations on coating protective Coat. 39 (2000) 67.
properties is negative. With these observations in mind, [16] D.Y. Perera, D.V. Eynde, J. Coat. Technol. 59 (1987) 55.
[17] E.V. Schmidt, Exterior Durability of Organic Coatings, Redhill,
accelerated methods for coating testing should include the Surrey UK, FMJ, 1988.
effect of temperature variations characteristic for the region [18] C. Decker, K. Zahouily, Polym. Degrad. Stab. 64 (1999) 293.
of coating application. [19] J.H.W. De Wit, in: Proceedings of the 12th International Corrosion
Congress, vol. 1, September 19–24, 1993, Houston, TX, p. 420.
[20] F. Mansfeld, J. Appl. Electrochem. 25 (1995) 187.
References [21] P.L. Bonora, F. Deflorian, L. Fedrizzi, Electrochim. Acta 41 (1996)
1073.
[22] G. Grundmeier, W. Schmidt, M. Stratmann, Electrochim. Acta 45
[1] Meteorological data from Internet Weather Station at Warsaw
(2000) 2515.
University of Technology, Faculty of Electronics and Information
[23] B.A. Boukamp, AC-immittance Data Analysis System—Equivalent
Technology. ftp://nms.ise.pw.edu.pl/meteo/meteo/.
Circuit, Twente University of Technology, Enschede, The
[2] G. Haynes, Cabinet, in: R. Baboian (Ed.), Corrosion Tests and
Netherlands, 1989.
Standards: Application and Interpretation, ASTM Manual Series:
[24] Ch.M. Hansen, Prog. Org. Coat. 26 (1995) 113.
MNL 20, Philadelphia, 1995, p. 91.