Questions

In APEX, create a web service reference that points to the SAP web service.
Implement APEX PL/SQL code or procedures to call the SAP web service, parse the
returned data, and insert/update it into Oracle database tables.
Display the SAP data in an APEX interactive report or form.
Write an ABAP function module that queries a SAP table lets say MARA for material
master data).
The module should return data in a json format suitable for web services.
Create an ABAP program that:

Reads data from a transparent table (like SFLIGHT or a custom table).

Uses internal tables and field symbols to manipulate the data.
Implements a loop to process the data, applying some conditional logic.
Generates a summarized output using ALV Grid Display (using cl_salv_table or older ALV
function modules).
Includes modularization with subroutines or class methods to check for SAP ABAP
version compatibility.
Detailed Requirements
Develop an ABAP program (report) with the following functionality:

Selection Screen:
Include parameters to filter data a parameter for Airline Carrier ID from the SFLIGHT
table.
Data Retrieval and Processing:
Read flight schedule data from the SFLIGHT table based on user input.
Use an internal table to store retrieved data.
Use a loop to process each flight record:
Calculate total available seats (SEATSOCC + SEATSMAX) or any other derived value.
Only include flights with more than a specified minimum number of seats (e.g., 100).
Conditional Logic and Compatibility Check:
Implement a compatibility check method that determines if the current system version
(SY-SAPRL) is compatible with certain new ABAP features.
For systems older than a certain release, use older ALV functions; for newer systems, use
cl_salv_table.
ALV Grid Display:
Display the resulting data in an ALV grid with columns for Airline, Flight Number, Seats,
etc.
Ensure the ALV uses modern ABAP object-oriented patterns if system version is
compatible, otherwise fall back to classic ALV function modules (like
REUSE_ALV_GRID_DISPLAY).
Documentation:
Use ABAP Doc or comments to document each part of the code, explaining how system
version compatibility is handled.
There are two individuals, one named A and the other B. Each person is either a knight
or a knave. Knights always tell the truth, and knaves always lie.
A says: "Both of us are knights." B says nothing. What are A and B?
Consider the statement: "This statement is false." Is the statement true or false?
You have three sealed envelopes: A, B, and C. One contains $100, another contains $200,
and the last contains $300.
You pick an envelope at random, open it, and see $100. You are then offered a chance to
switch envelopes with one of the two unopened ones. Is it advantageous to switch?
GPT o1-preview response(hGPT Aplha response( Comparison
extract('//urn:YourRespon SELECT
seElement', extractValue(l_xml,
'xmlns:urn="urn:sap- '/Envelope/Body/RE
com:document:sap:rfc:fun SULT_NODE')
ctions"'))) t INTO l_value
) LOOP FROM dual;
-- Insert or Update into
your Oracle table -- Insert or update
MERGE INTO the Oracle table
your_table dst MERGE INTO
USING (SELECT your_table t
rec.column1 AS col1, USING (SELECT
rec.column2 AS col2 l_value AS field1
FROM dual) src FROM dual) src
ON (dst.primary_key = ON (t.id =
src.col1) src.field1)
WHEN MATCHED WHEN MATCHED
THEN THEN
UPDATE SET UPDATE SET
dst.column2 = src.col2 t.value = src.field1
WHEN NOT MATCHED WHEN NOT
THEN MATCHED THEN
INSERT INSERT (id, value)
(dst.primary_key, VALUES (src.field1,
dst.column2) src.field1);
VALUES (src.col1,
src.col2); EXCEPTION
END LOOP; WHEN OTHERS
THEN
-- Commit the -- Handle
transaction exceptions
COMMIT;
EXCEPTION DBMS_OUTPUT.put
WHEN OTHERS THEN _line('Error: ' ||
ROLLBACK; SQLERRM);
RAISE; END sync_sap_data;
END; /
 WHERE matnr =
iv_matnr. "Select records
ELSE. from MARA based
" Retrieve all records on optional material
(be cautious with large number filter
datasets) IF i_matnr IS NOT
SELECT * INITIAL.
FROM mara SELECT * FROM
INTO TABLE lt_mara mara INTO TABLE
UP TO 100 ROWS. " lt_mara
Limit for performance WHERE matnr =
considerations i_matnr.
ENDIF. ELSE.
SELECT * FROM
" Check if data is mara INTO TABLE
retrieved lt_mara UP TO 100
IF lt_mara IS INITIAL. ROWS.
ev_json_data = " Limits selection
'{"message":"No data for demonstration
found"}'. (remove UP TO
RETURN. clause as needed)
ENDIF. ENDIF.

" Convert MARA data to " Convert the

JSON format MARA data into
TRY. JSON using
ev_json_data = /UI2/CL_JSON
/ui2/cl_json=>serialize( da serializer
ta = lt_mara ). lv_json = Alpha is way to
CATCH cx_root INTO /ui2/cl_json=>seriali faster to generate to
DATA(lx_error). ze( data = lt_mara ). code than o1-
ev_json_data = preview
'{"error":"' && lx_error- " Set the exporting Alpha took: 4 secs to
>get_text( ) && '"}'. parameter to the generate
ENDTRY. serialized JSON o1-preview took 26
e_json = lv_json. secs to generate the
ENDFUNCTION. ENDFUNCTION. response
 ls_fieldcat-seltext_m = 'DISTANCE'.
'Flight No.'. ls_fieldcat-
APPEND ls_fieldcat TO seltext_m = 'Total
pt_fieldcat. Seats'.
APPEND
CLEAR ls_fieldcat. ls_fieldcat TO
ls_fieldcat-fieldname = lt_fieldcat.
'FLDATE'.
ls_fieldcat-seltext_m = " Title
'Flight Date'. lv_title = |SFLIGHT
APPEND ls_fieldcat TO Data for Airline
pt_fieldcat. { p_airline }|.

CLEAR ls_fieldcat. " Display using

ls_fieldcat-fieldname = classical ALV
'SEATSMAX'. CALL FUNCTION
ls_fieldcat-seltext_m = 'REUSE_ALV_GRID_
'Max Seats'. DISPLAY'
APPEND ls_fieldcat TO EXPORTING
pt_fieldcat. i_title =
lv_title
CLEAR ls_fieldcat. it_fieldcat =
ls_fieldcat-fieldname = lt_fieldcat
'SEATSOCC'. TABLES
ls_fieldcat-seltext_m = t_outtab =
'Occupied Seats'. it_data
APPEND ls_fieldcat TO EXCEPTIONS
pt_fieldcat. program_error
=1
CLEAR ls_fieldcat. OTHERS = 2.
ls_fieldcat-fieldname = IF sy-subrc <> 0. alpha took 2 secs
'TOTAL_SEATS'. MESSAGE 'Error o1-preview
ls_fieldcat-seltext_m = displaying ALV' TYPE took: 7 secs
'Total Seats'. 'E'.
APPEND ls_fieldcat TO ENDIF. alpha response is in
pt_fieldcat. ENDIF. detail for the code
ENDFORM. ENDFORM. generated
Since B says nothing, and There isn't enough
we have no prompting for information in A's
B to speak, it's acceptable statement alone to
for B (whether knight or determine uniquely
knave) to remain silent. whether B is a
knight or a knave.
Given that both scenarios The silence of B
under A being a knave are does not provide
possible, but Scenario 1 additional
provides a unique constraints or
outcome, the most logical information to
conclusion is: eliminate any
scenarios.
Final Answer
A is a knight. 5. Conclusion
B is a knight. Given the statement
Explanation: and the silence of B,
there is not enough
A, being a knight, tells the information to
truth when he says, "Both uniquely determine
of us are knights." the roles of A and B.
This means both A and B The possible roles
are knights. that fit the
B says nothing, which is statement are:
acceptable behavior for a
knight. A is a Knight and B is
Summary a Knight, or
The only scenario that A is a Knave and B is
leads to a definitive and a Knight, or
unique conclusion without A is a Knave and B is
ambiguity is that both A a Knave.
and B are knights. This Without further
aligns with the information or
expectation in logic constraints, we
puzzles to find a single cannot pinpoint a
solution based on the single definitive a:18sec
given information. solution. o1:35 secs
mathematics, such as statement in
Russell's paradox, which classical binary logic.
questions the set of all Conclusion
sets that do not contain In classical boolean
themselves. logic, the statement
Summary "This statement is
The Paradox: "This false." cannot be
statement is false" cannot definitively classified
be consistently classified as true or false. It is
as true or false without paradoxical because
contradiction. assuming it to be
Resolution: The paradox true or false leads to
remains unresolved within a contradiction.
classical logic but can be
approached using non- This illustrates a
classical logical systems. fundamental
Significance: The liar limitation of
paradox is a fundamental attempting to apply
problem that encourages straightforward
deeper exploration into true/false valuations
the nature of truth, to self-referential
language, and logic. statements in logic.
Final Answer Various logical
The statement "This systems, such as
statement is false" is a multi-valued logics
paradox that cannot be or paraconsistent
truthfully labeled as either logics, have been
true or false without developed to handle
leading to a contradiction. such paradoxical
It exemplifies the statements in more
limitations of classical sophisticated ways.
logic when dealing with However, within the
self-referential standard true/false
statements, and as such, it logic framework, the
is neither simply true nor statement remains
simply false—it is paradoxical and a:2 secs
paradoxical. unresolvable. o1:10 secs
Conclusion
It is advantageous to Step 7: Conclusion
switch envelopes because: It is advantageous to
switch because the
You increase your expected value of
expected winnings from switching ($250) is
$100 to $250. higher than the
There is no risk of ending certain $100 you
up with less than $100 by have.
switching.
Switching is the optimal Additional
decision based on the Explanation:
information available. Intuition and
Additional Note Probability
This scenario differs from Intuition: You know
some classic probability your envelope has
puzzles (like the Monty the lowest amount
Hall problem) because: ($100). The other
two envelopes have
Monty Hall Involves Host more money ($200
Knowledge: In the Monty and $300). By
Hall problem, the host's switching, you are
actions provide additional guaranteed to get
information. more than $100 on
Your Scenario is Simpler: average.
Here, there's no host Probability Aspect:
manipulating outcomes— Because you
you're simply updating definitely have $100
your strategy based on in your current
new information (the envelope, both
$100 you found). remaining envelopes
Final Answer: Yes, are more valuable.
switching envelopes is Switching is better
advantageous because it because, on
increases your expected average, you'll
winnings from $100 to benefit from a a:4 secs
$250. higher amount. o1:32 secs