WORKSHOP 3
WORKSHOP 3
The term was first used in German by Christian Karl Reisig in 1825 in his work,
[Lectures on Latin Linguistics]
Semasiology came into its own in the 1830’s when a German scholar Karl Reisig,
lecturing in classical philology, suggested that the studies of meaning should be
regarded as an independent branch of knowledge. Reisig’s lectures were published
by his pupil F. Heerdegen in 1839 some years after Reisig’s death. At that time,
however, they produced but little stir. It was Michel Breal, a Frenchman, who played
a decisive part in the creation and development of the new science. His book “Essai
de semantique” (Paris, 1897) became widely known and was followed by a
considerable number of investigations and monographs on meaning not only in
France, but in other countries as well.
The treatment of meaning throughout the 19 th century and in the first decade of the
20th was purely diachronistic. Attention was concentrated upon the process of
semantic change and the part semantic principles should play in etymology.
Semasiology was even defined at that time as a science dealing with the changes in
word meaning, their causes and classification
In the 20th century the progress of semasiology was uneven. The 1930’s were said to
be the most crucial time in its whole history. After the work of F. de Saussure the
structural orientation came to the forefront of semasiology when Jost Trier, a
German philologist, offered his theory of semantic fields, treating semantic
phenomena historically and within a definite language system at a definite period of
its development.
Many words in everyday language do not carry any meaning, at least not in anything like
the eagle sense. Consider sentence (1).
● (1) It is raining.
There is only one element in (1) with any independent meaning. The it certainly does not
refer to anything. (You can’t seek clarification of (1) by asking What is raining?) The is
has no meaning. Indeed, the verb to be in general is completely devoid of intrinsic
meaning. So why are there three words in this sentence, which really consists of a single
meaningful element – raining?
Many words in language are there only because the syntax of a language demands that
sentences conform to certain templates; in English, for example, that they have both a
verb and a subject. The subject is usually the doer in a sentence. But there is no real
subject in the fact that it is raining today – it is just a state of affairs. Thus English
syntax demands we fill in the sentence with what is largely meaningless material – it –
to make the sentence well-formed.
We see from the above that identifying the meaning of a word depends not just on its
phonological form (see The Phonological Problem), but on two other things. These are:
Semiotics is still used to denote a broader field: the study of sign using behavior in
general. It sign achieves a meaning only in comparison with other science, its
neighbours. That is meaning can be studied only through context. It is an attempt to
study the systems of semantic relation between words.
Example of semantic problem For example, when people say or use the word gay.
One person might think its related to the sexuality of someone. There are others that
say “that's gay” to them, it might mean that's sucks, or others might use the word gay
as happy.
Semantic barriers: The barriers, which are concerned with problems and
obstructions in the process of encoding and decoding of a message into words or
impressions are called semantic barriers. Such barriers resut in faulty translations,
Misunderstood Words
When used in spoken language, however, this can easily cause confusion. For
example, the words 'write' and 'right'. They sound the same but mean different
things. We can avoid confusion by choosing a different word, for example 'correct'
instead of 'right'.different interpretations, etc.
•referential approach
Semantic triangle
The common feature of any referential approach is the implication that meaning is
connected with the referent. The word is thus defined as the basic linguistic unit
which refers to (denotes) an object of reality and reflects (signifies) its concept in the
speaker’s and listener’s mind.
•functional approach
L.Bloomfield maintained that the meaning of a linguistic unit may be studied only
through its relation to other linguistic-units and not through its relation to either
concept or referent.
In a very simplified form the approach can be illustrated as a number of context that
allow the user of the language identify the meaning.
4. Define lexical meaning from the point of view of these approaches. Who
fathered each approach?
functional approach (L. Bloomfield) maintains that the meaning of a word may be
studied only through its relation to other words
The account of meaning given by Ferdinand de Saussure implies the definition of a word
as a linguistic sign. He calls it 'signifiant' (signifier) and what it refers to — 'signifie' (that
which is signified). By the latter term he understands not the phenomena of the real world but
the concept in the speaker's and listener's mind. The situation may be represented by a
triangle:
Here, according to F. de Saussure, only the relationship shown by a solid line concerns
linguistics and the sign is not a unity of form and meaning as we understand it now, but only
sound form.
Originally this triangular scheme was suggested by the German mathematician and
philosopher Gotlieb Frege (1848-1925).
Well-known English scholars C.K. Ogden and I.A. Richards adopted this three-cornered
pattern with considerable modifications. With them a sign is a two-facet unit comprising form
(phonetical and orthographic), regarded as a linguistic symbol, and reference which is more
linguistic than just a concept. This approach may be called referential because it implies that
linguistic meaning is connected with the referent. It is graphically shown by there being only
one dotted line. A solid line between reference and referent shows that the relationship
between them is linguistically relevant, that the nature of what is named influences the
meaning. This connection should not be taken too literally, it does not mean that the sound
form has to have any similarity with the meaning or the object itself. The connection is
conventional.
Several generations of writers, following C.K. Ogden and I. A. Richards, have in their
turn taken up and modified this diagram. It is known under several names: the semantic
triangle, triangle of signification, Frege semiotic triangle, Ogden and Richards basic triangle
or simply basic triangle.
We reproduce it for the third time to illustrate how it can show the main features of the
referential approach in its present form. All the lines are now solid, implying that it is not
only the form of the linguistic sign but also its meaning and what it refers to that are relevant
for linguistics.
The scheme is still over-simplified and several things are left out.
It is very important, for instance, to remember that the word is represented by the left-
hand side of the diagram — it is a sign comprising the name and the meaning, and these
invariably evoke one another. So we have to assume that the word takes two apexes of the
triangle and the line connecting them. In some versions of the triangle it is not the meaning
but the concept that is placed in the apex. This reflects the approach to the problem as
formulated by medieval grammarians; it remained traditional for many centuries.
The diagram represents the simplest possible case of reference because the word here is
supposed to have only one meaning and one form of fixation. Simplification, is, however,
inherent to all models and the popularity of the semantic triangle proves how many authors
find it helpful in showing the essence of the referential approach.
6. Tell the difference between classical typology of lexical meaning and modern ones.
Central the most recurrent meaning of the word semantic structure, recognized apart
from the context
Peripheric any meaning but the central one
● - a reciprocal relation between name and sense, which enables them to call up one another
(St.Ullmann);
● - function in a context. Meaning, then, we use the whole complex of functions which a
linguistic form may have (J.R.Firth);
● - a function of the descriptions at all levels (M.A.K.Halliday) and many others.
● 1. Nominative.
● 2. Nominative- derivative
● 3. Collegationally and collocationally conditioned.
● 4. Phraseologically bound.
1. Nominative is the basic meaning of a word, which refers to objects of extra linguistic reality
in a direct way and reflects their actual relations.
2. Nominative-Derivative meaning comes into being when the word is “stretched out”
semantically to cover new facts and extra linguistic phenomena.
The fact that language is a tool that can perform nominative, communicative and
expressive functions, the internal dualism of language on the one hand, it is a form of thinking
that reflects an objective existence, and on the other hand, the essence of each element is
an independent system arising from the internal relations of this element with other elements.
If the nominative function of the language is related to the fact that its form of thinking is a tool
that shapes concepts, then its expressive function is related to the fact that the language is an
independent system, the essence of elements can be revealed only from their internal
relations. The fact that the language has nominative and expressive functions must be
reflected in the elements of the language, especially in the word. Because the word is the main
unit of the lexicon and grammar, which are the main levels of the language. In this
article, we will consider denotative and connotative meanings in word semantics.
In fact, all linguists note that the word has two different meanings: (denotative) name, naming
and additional emotional expressive (connotative) meaning. The additional meaning of the
word is called by different names in linguistics, such as "stylistic coloring", "expressive
meaning ottenka", "additional meaning". Underlying these designations are the terms
denotation and connotation. There are scientifically based opinions devoted to the denotative
meaning of the word, the place of the denotative meaning in the speech process, because
the denotative meaning is the main function of the word. But in the speech, there are
connotative meanings that give different shades of additional meaning to the denotative
meaning, and if one feature is expressed in a certain context, another edge can be found
in another context. In the scientific literature, it is noted that connotation is the expression
of the connotative meaning of the language unit attached to the denotation, and the additional
symbols surrounding it.
Connotation is a semantic entity included in the semantics of language units, and it
expresses the emotive evaluation and methodologically determined attitude of the subject of
speech to existence. In the further development of linguistics,interest in the connotative
aspect of linguistic units has increased, but the concept of connotation is interpreted
differently in different disciplines. In particular, in stylistics, connotation is considered as a
stylistic meaning, and it is studied with emotional coloring. In translation studies,
connotation is viewed as a pragmatic meaning, and semasiologists who study meaning in
a systematic aspect view connotation as an expressive color, an emotional expression. In
psychological studies, connotation is approached as semantic associations. No matter how
this term is assessed, its main function is the function of influence, which is directly and
continuously connected with the pragmatics of speech. When studying the structure of word
semantics, there are two types of connotation: inherent (the connotative meaning inherent in a
word when it is taken out of context), adherent connotation (the connotative meaning that is
formed in a word in a certain context ).We give the following examples of how the internal con
notative meaning can or cannot be a part of the semantics of a word: Analyzing the adjective "
beautiful" in the English language, its synonymous line, beautiful is neutral (or dominant),
its synonyms : pretty, attractive, lovely... are words with additional colors. For example: she was
beautiful girl so we need
1. Nominative is the basic meaning of a word, which refers to objects of extra linguistic reality
in a direct way and reflects their actual relations.
2. Nominative-Derivative meaning comes into being when the word is “stretched out”
semantically to cover new facts and extra linguistic phenomena.
significative :: denotative.
Signification – 1) one of the basic notions of semasiology (q.v.) referring to the
virtual ability of linguistic signs to bear the information about their denotata in
terms of their indispensable and ascribed properties. According to D. Crystal, s. is
that aspect of word's meaning which stresses that 'sign' function of linguistic
expressions. Lexical items are viewed upon as signs within the sign system of
language vocabulary. The relationship between sign and thing or sign and concept
is s. S. as the word's systemic meaning within the structure of the lexicon is
opposed to denotation as what the word is used to name, hence the opposition
significatum (q.v.) vs. denotatum (q.v.). When words are used literally in their
factual objective primary meanings denotation and s. coincides – are brought into
agreement. Semantic changes however go beyond signification, because when
words are used to refer to a new object or concept (to name a new thing), they
depart from the systematised structure of their meaning (signification), and acquire
a new dimension. Their reference (denotation) is thus being extended to bring
about new shades or nuances of meaning. It can be the process of semantic
derivation or the process of the appearance of new connotations. However, in
modern semantics the term s. developed a second (somewhat narrower) reading: 2)
significative meaning – type of lexical meaning, non-referential by its nature,
which reflects the concept of property/feature as opposed to the concept of class,
reflected in denotative meaning (which can thus be termed referential) – See
Denotation-2). Significative meaning is actualised primarily by verbs and
adjectives, articles, morphemes.
Denotation (denotational/denotative meaning) – 1) the part of lexical semantics
which involves the relationship between a linguistic unit (a lexical item) and the
non-linguistic entities to which it refers. It is thus equivalent to referential
meaning-1; 2) the type of meaning which reflects the concept of a class and is
actualised by lexical items in situations when they denote a class of
referents/denotata, is supported by the generalising and classifying function of the
articles; 3) the expression of the core/main/central/cognitive meaning, meaning
proper of a linguistic unit in contrast to its connotation (q.v.). E.g. the denotation of
dog is the animal characterized by certain features discriminating it from cats,
whales, elephants, its connotation might include helper, friend, etc
Meaning is direct when it nominates the referent without the help of a context,
in isolation; meaning is figurative when the referent is named and at the same
time characterised through its similarity with other objects, e.g. tough meat -
direct meaning, tough politician - figurative meaning.
The status of individual meanings is not the same. We distinguish between the
central (=basic, major) meaning and minor meanings.
(1) The basic meaning occurs in various and widely different contexts. It is
representative of the word taken in isolation, i.e. it occurs to us when we hear/see
the word in isolation; that is why it is called a free meaning.
e.g. the central meaning of TABLE is "a piece of furniture" Minor meanings occur
only in specific contexts, e.g. to keep the table amused (TABLE 2) or the table of
contents (TABLE 7).
e.g. TABLE 1 has the highest frequency value and makes up 52% of all the uses of
the word; TABLE 7 accounts for 35%; all the other meanings between them make up
just 13% of all the uses.
(3) The basic meaning is usually stylistically neutral and minor meanings are as a
rule stylistically coloured,
3) cowardly (coll).
Synchronically, we also distinguish between direct meanings and figurative
(transferred) meanings,
e.g. YELLOW 4) (fig) (of looks, mood, feelings, etc.) jealous, envious, suspicious.
We should note that a word may have two or more central meanings,
5.4. Words of different languages are said to be correlated when their central
meanings coincide,
Context plays a crucial role in the realization of word lexical meaning. Lexical
meaning refers to the basic, dictionary definition of a word. However, the meaning of
a word can be influenced and shaped by the context in which it is used. Here are a
few ways in which context impacts the realization of word lexical meaning:
1. Polysemy: Many words in natural language have multiple meanings. The
specific meaning of a word in a given context is often determined by the
surrounding words, sentence structure, and the overall discourse. For
example, the word "bank" can refer to a financial institution or the side of a
river, and the context helps us understand which meaning is intended.
Word: "Bank"
2. Meaning: In this context, "bank" refers to the side of a river or a sloping land
along a body of water.
In both contexts, the word "bank" is used, but its specific meaning is determined by
the surrounding words and the overall context. This demonstrates how context
influences the realization of word lexical meaning and helps us understand the
intended sense of the word.
2. Homonymy: Similar to polysemy, homonyms are words that have the same
form but different meanings. In such cases, context plays a crucial role in
disambiguating the intended meaning. For instance, the word "bat" can refer
to a flying mammal or a piece of sports equipment, and the context helps us
differentiate between the two meanings.
Word: "Bat"
In both contexts, the word "bat" is spelled and pronounced the same, but it has
different meanings. The intended sense of the word is disambiguated based on the
context in which it is used. This exemplifies how context plays a crucial role in
understanding the specific meaning of a homonymous word.
3. Collocations: Context helps us understand the appropriate collocations or
combinations of words that are commonly used together. For example, the
verb "make" can collocate with various nouns, such as "make a decision,"
"make a mistake," or "make a cake." The specific noun used in combination
with "make" provides crucial context for understanding the intended meaning.
Word: "Make"
1. Meaning: In this context, "make" collocates with "decision," and the phrase
means to come to a conclusion or choose an option.
2. Meaning: In this context, "make" collocates with "mistake," and the phrase
means to commit an error or do something incorrectly.
3. Meaning: In this context, "make" collocates with "cake," and the phrase means
to prepare or create a cake.
In each of these contexts, the verb "make" is used with specific nouns ("decision,"
"mistake," and "cake") to form commonly used phrases or collocations. The choice
of noun in combination with "make" is crucial for understanding the intended
meaning of the phrase.
Context: Two friends are planning to meet up, but one of them is running late.
Pragmatic interpretation: In this context, Friend 2's response of "I'm around the
corner" is understood pragmatically to mean that they are close to the meeting
location, despite not providing an exact location or time frame. The implication is
that they will arrive shortly.
The pragmatic interpretation takes into account contextual cues, shared knowledge
between the friends, and the conversational implicature. While the literal meaning of
"I'm around the corner" suggests proximity to a physical corner, the pragmatic
interpretation relies on the assumption that the friend is using the expression to
convey their imminent arrival.
Word: "Cat"
The semantic constraints imposed by the word "cat" help us understand that it refers
to a specific type of animal and not, for instance, a machine or a fictional creature. By
considering these semantic constraints in the context of the sentence, we can
accurately interpret the intended meaning of the word "cat" as an animal climbing a
tree.
In summary, context plays a vital role in shaping and determining the realization of
word lexical meaning. It helps disambiguate polysemous and homonymous words,
guides appropriate word combinations (collocations), incorporates pragmatic
factors, and imposes semantic constraints on word interpretation. By considering
the context, we can arrive at a more accurate understanding of the intended meaning
of words in natural language.
10. Read the following passage and decide what approach to
meaning (Referential or Functional) E.A. Nida adheres to.
The tendency to think of the meaning of a word, e.g. apple, boy, dog,
or sun, as apart from an actual communication event is fundamentally
a mistake, for once we have isolated a word from its living context,
we no longer possess the insight necessary to appreciate fully its real
functions.
Based on the provided passage, it appears that E.A. Nida adheres to the Functional
approach to meaning. The passage suggests that Nida emphasizes the importance
of considering the meaning of a word in the context of an actual communication
event rather than isolating it from its living context. This aligns with the key
principles of the Functional approach, which focuses on the role of language in
communication and emphasizes the context-dependent nature of meaning. Nida's
statement suggests that understanding the real functions of a word requires insight
into its usage and contextual nuances, which supports the Functional approach.
1. Cultural and Social Factors: Changes in cultural and social contexts can lead
to shifts in word meanings. As societies evolve, new concepts, technologies,
and social practices emerge, requiring the creation or adaptation of words to
describe them. For example, words like "tweet," "selfie," and "emoji" have
emerged with the rise of social media and digital culture.
2. Technological Advancements: Technological advancements often introduce
new concepts and objects that require linguistic adaptation. New inventions
or technologies may lead to the creation of new words or the adaptation of
existing words to encompass novel meanings. For instance, the word "mouse"
has undergone semantic change from referring to a small rodent to a
computer input device.
3. Borrowing from Other Languages: Interaction between languages can result in
the borrowing of words, which can introduce new meanings or alter existing
ones. When words are borrowed from one language to another, they may
undergo semantic shifts due to differences in cultural and linguistic contexts.
For example, the English word "kimono" was borrowed from Japanese and its
meaning shifted from a general term for clothing to specifically refer to a
traditional Japanese garment.
4. Historical Events and Influences: Historical events and external influences can
impact language and lead to semantic change. For example, political changes,
colonization, trade, and conquest can introduce new ideas, cultural practices,
and languages, resulting in the assimilation or adaptation of foreign words and
meanings into a native language.
5. Changes in Attitudes and Values: Shifts in societal attitudes, values, and
ideologies can influence the meanings of words. As cultural and societal
norms change, words may acquire new connotations or undergo shifts in
meaning to reflect these evolving perspectives. For instance, words related to
gender, race, and social identity have experienced semantic changes to reflect
more inclusive and sensitive language use.
Generalization can occur due to various linguistic and extralinguistic factors. Here
are some common mechanisms and examples of generalization in semantic
change:
Specialization can occur due to various linguistic and extralinguistic factors. Here
are some common mechanisms and examples of specialization in semantic change:
5. Borrowing and Cultural Influences: When words are borrowed from other
languages or influenced by different cultures, alterations in the concept can
occur, leading to changes in nominative meaning. The transferred concepts
may be adapted or modified in the recipient language, resulting in shifts in
meaning. For example, the word "salsa" was borrowed from Spanish and
initially referred to a sauce, but its meaning has expanded to include a style of
Latin American dance and music.
For example, consider the word "mouse." Originally, the word "mouse"
referred specifically to a small rodent. However, with the development of
technology, the word's meaning extended to include a computer input
device that resembles the shape of a small rodent. In this case, the word
"mouse" underwent extension, as it acquired a new sense related to
technology.
Extreme Generalization:
Cunning - Initially the one who has the most potential, now the tricky one
17. Read the extracts below and be ready to comment on the ideas
expressed.
A) The first extract highlights the idea that when a word transitions from
general usage to a specialized domain of communication, it typically undergoes
a process of meaning specialization. This means that the word's meaning
becomes more specific and focused, allowing it to name fewer objects or have
fewer referents. However, despite the narrowing of its application, the word's
content becomes richer as it encompasses a greater number of relevant features
that characterize the notion being expressed.
The author suggests that as a word becomes specialized, it provides more
detailed and nuanced information about the objects it refers to. This process of
specialization allows for greater precision and specificity in communication
within specific domains or contexts.
The ideas expressed in the extract highlight the dynamic nature of language and
how words can evolve and adapt to serve specific purposes or convey
specialized meanings. It emphasizes the trade-off between breadth and depth of
meaning, as a word's specialization, reduces its general applicability but
enhances its ability to convey detailed information within its specific domain.
We can take another example to illustrate the role of context in fixing the
meaning of words: Consider the word "bank" On its own, "bank" can have
multiple meanings. It could refer to a financial institution, or it could refer to the
edge of a river. Without any context, it is unclear which specific meaning of
"bank" is intended. However, when used in a sentence like "I went to the bank
to withdraw some cash," the context of the sentence clarifies that "bank" refers
to a financial institution. So the meaning of the word "bank" is determined by
the context in which it is used. Without context, the word itself is potentially
ambiguous. The specific meaning emerges when the word is placed within a
sentence or a broader communicative context, allowing the listener or reader to
understand the intended interpretation.
PRACTICAL PART
Exercises
Exercise 1. Draw semasiological triangle and dwell on the correlation
among its three points.
"Semantic triangle": the relationship between three "forms and the sound of
the sign language" personal.
The common feature of any referential approach is the implication that
meaning is connected with the referent. The word is thus defined as the basic
linguistic unit which refers to (denotes) an object of reality and reflects
(signifies) its concept in the speaker’s and listener’s mind.
All the lines are now solid, implying that it is not only the form of the linguistic sign but also its
meaning and what it refers to that are relevant for lin- guistics.
● a period in history
● the particular point in the day at which people who are drinking in a bar in the
U.K. have to finish their drinks and leave
tide - the alternate rising and falling of the surface of the ocean and of water bodies
(such as gulfs and bays) connected with the ocean that occurs usually twice a day and
is the result of differing gravitational forces exerted at different parts of the earth by
another body (such as the moon or sun)
● a flowing stream
spring - the season between winter and summer comprising in the northern
hemisphere usually the months of March, April, and May or as reckoned
astronomically extending from the March equinox to the June solstice - central
meaning
● in sports, the painted mark that signals the finishing point of a race
bar - a place where drinks, especially alcoholic drinks, are sold and drunk, or the area
in such a place where the person serving the drinks stands - central
● a substance that has been made into a solid rectangular shape(bar of soap) -
central
● one of the small equal parts into which a piece of music is divided, containing a
fixed number of beats
● a strong pole, esp. one made of metal, used as a support, to force something to
move, or to block an opening - bar of cage
hospital - a place where people who are sick or injured are treated) and taken care of
by doctors and nurses- central meaning
Exercise 5. Trace the process of Specialisation of nominative meaning in the words below:
Bible, girl, wife, meat, room, poison, tide, garage, hangar, starve, hound, deer, fowl, worm,
hospital, voyage.
1. Bible: Originally, the word "Bible" referred to a collection of religious texts. Over time, it
has become specifically associated with the sacred scriptures of Christianity.
2. Girl: Initially, the term "girl" was used to refer to a small child of either gender. However,
it gradually came to denote a young female child or a young woman.
3. Wife: Originally, "wife" simply meant a woman. However, its meaning became specialized
to refer specifically to a married woman.
4. Meat: In its broader sense, "meat" referred to any type of food. Over time, it has become
more commonly associated with animal flesh used for consumption.
5. Room: Initially, "room" had a more general meaning of an enclosed space. However, it has
become more specialized to refer to a specific part of a building used for a particular purpose,
such as a living room or a bedroom.
6. Poison: Originally, "poison" referred to any substance that could cause harm or death.
With specialization, it came to specifically denote a toxic substance that is harmful when
ingested, inhaled, or otherwise exposed to the body.
7. Tide: Initially, "tide" had a broader meaning of the periodic rise and fall of the sea level.
However, it became more specialized to refer specifically to the regular rise and fall of the
sea caused by gravitational forces.
8. Garage: Originally, "garage" referred to a shelter for vehicles or a place to store them. Its
meaning has become more specialized to specifically denote a building or structure designed
for housing and protecting cars.
9. Hangar: Similar to "garage," "hangar" originally had a more general meaning of a shelter
or storage space. It has become specialized to refer to a large building or structure specifically
designed for housing and maintaining aircraft.
10. Starve: Initially, "starve" had a broader meaning of dying. Over time, it has become more
specialized to specifically refer to the severe or prolonged deprivation of food, often resulting
in emaciation or death.
11. Hound: Originally, "hound" referred to any type of dog. It has become more specialized
to specifically denote a breed or type of dog used for hunting or tracking.
12. Deer: Initially, "deer" had a broader meaning and could refer to any animal. It has become
more specialized to specifically denote a type of ungulate mammal characterized by antlers,
found in various species.
13. Fowl: In its broader sense, "fowl" referred to any bird. With specialization, it has become
more commonly associated with domesticated birds raised for meat or eggs, such as chickens
or turkeys.
14. Worm: Initially, "worm" had a more general meaning and could refer to various types of
invertebrate animals. It has become more specialized to specifically denote a long, slender,
and often legless invertebrate animal, such as an earthworm.
15. Hospital: Originally, "hospital" had a broader meaning of any place providing medical
care or treatment. Over time, it has become more specialized to specifically refer to an
institution or facility where medical and surgical services are provided.
16. Voyage: Initially, "voyage" had a broader meaning of any journey or travel. It has
become more specialized to specifically denote a long journey, typically by sea or in space.
Exercise 6. Trace the evolution of lexical meanings of the words thing and do. What
makes them words of wide semantics? (Use Etymological dictionary)
THING
The word "thing" has a complex and varied evolution in its lexical meanings. Here is a brief
overview of the different senses and shifts in meaning that "thing" has undergone over time:
1. Old English: In Old English, the word "thing" (spelled as "þing") originally referred to
a public assembly or a meeting, particularly in a legal or political context. It denoted a
gathering where important matters were discussed, decisions were made, and disputes
were settled.
2. Object or Entity: Over time, the meaning of "thing" expanded to encompass a general
sense of an object or entity. It became a more generic term to refer to any physical or
conceptual item, often used when the specific name or description was unknown or not
important.
DO
The word "do" has undergone significant evolution in its lexical meanings throughout the
history of the English language. Here is a general overview of the different senses and shifts
in meaning that "do" has experienced:
1. Old English: In Old English, the word "do" (spelled as "don") primarily denoted the
act of performing or executing an action. It was used in a general sense to express any
kind of action or activity.
2. Auxiliary Verb: Over time, "do" evolved into an auxiliary verb with multiple
functions. It began to be used to form questions and negative statements, as well as to
emphasize or intensify the action of the main verb. For example, "Do you like ice
cream?" or "I do enjoy a good book."
3. Substitute Verb: In certain contexts, "do" started to function as a substitute verb when
the main verb was not specified or necessary. It served as a generic verb to represent
various actions or activities, particularly in expressions like "do your homework" or "do
the dishes."
4. Accomplishing or Performing: "Do" acquired the meaning of accomplishing or
performing a task or duty. It denoted the act of completing an action or fulfilling an
obligation. For instance, "I have to do my chores" or "She did a great job."
5. Creating or Producing: "Do" expanded its meaning to include the notion of creating,
producing, or making something. It came to represent the act of bringing something into
existence or executing a specific task. Examples include "do your hair" or "do a painting."
6. Acting or Behaving: Another shift in meaning for "do" occurred in relation to acting
or behaving in a certain way. It started to convey the idea of performing actions or
exhibiting behaviors consistent with a particular role or expectation. For example, "She
did the right thing" or "He does his best."
7. Effecting or Influencing: In certain contexts, "do" also acquired the sense of effecting
or influencing a change or outcome. It came to represent the act of causing something to
happen or producing a result. For instance, "Exercise can do wonders for your health."
Amelioration (elevation): word loses negative connotations or gains positive ones, e.g. a minister
(earlier it meant “servant” and now it means “an important public official”), a knight (earlier it meant
“a title of rank” and now it means “a boy”).
(adj) illustrious,
distinguished, of high rank
or birth,
1. I crouched down and caught her a smart smack on the left cheekbone. 2. He seems to be
quite smart on the head. 3. He spent a day in a smart place. 4. There's no room for doubt. 5.
He was helped across the room. 6. See to it you don't get the flu. 7. He got what he deserved.
8. Can you get my meaning? 9. Tom got us sitting in armchairs. 10. Does it take you long to
get to his place? 11. Nail Parkinson popped out of his depression. 12. Pop in and see me
sometime. 13. It is difficult to see you as a Prime Minister, Dr. Audlin. 14. Were you his
mistress, Betty? 15. The deer has just been killed.
1 Meaning: "smart"
In the given sentence, the word "smart" is used to describe a sharp or stinging
sensation caused by the smack on the left cheekbone. It denotes a sudden, intense,
and painful feeling. This is a change in meaning from the more commonly known
usage of "smart" to refer to intelligence or stylishness.
In this sentence, the word "smart" is used to describe someone who is intelligent or
clever. However, it is used in an unusual context by saying "smart on the head." This
suggests that the meaning of "smart" has been altered to indicate intelligence
specifically in the head or mind, which is a departure from its typical usage.
Here, the word "smart" is used to describe a place. Normally, "smart" refers to
someone who is well-dressed or stylish, but in this context, it denotes that the place
is fashionable or upscale. The meaning of "smart" has shifted from describing a
person's appearance to describing the quality or ambiance of a location.
The word "doubt" in this sentence retains its usual meaning, indicating a lack of
certainty or trust in something. There is no change in meaning observed.
The word "helped" in this sentence retains its typical meaning of assisting or
supporting someone. There is no change in meaning observed.
The word "deserved" in this sentence retains its standard meaning, indicating that
someone received what they rightfully earned or merited. There is no change in
meaning observed.
The word "meaning" in this sentence retains its ordinary meaning, representing the
intended significance or interpretation of something. There is no change in meaning
observed.
The word "got" in this sentence retains its typical meaning of obtaining or acquiring.
There is no change in meaning observed.
The word "get" in this sentence retains its usual meaning of reaching or arriving at a
particular place. There is no change in meaning observed.
The phrase "popped out" in this sentence retains its standard meaning of suddenly
appearing or emerging. There is no change in meaning observed.
The phrase "pop in" in this sentence retains its typical meaning of visiting someone
briefly or informally. There is no change in meaning observed.
The phrase "see as" in this sentence retains its ordinary meaning, indicating
perceiving or recognizing someone as a particular role or position. There is no
change in meaning observed.
The word "killed" in this sentence retains its standard meaning of causing the death
of something or someone. There is no change in meaning observed.