Fouad Boulaid / Jurnal Arbitrer - Vol. 10 No.

4 (2023)

Online version available in : http://arbitrer.fib.unand.ac.id

JURNAL ARBITRER
| 2339-1162 (Print) | 2550-1011 (Online) |

Article

ChatGPT in The Lab: Analyzing the Potential Pros and

Cons for Research Professionals
Fouad Boulaid1
1
Sultan Moulay Slimane University, Beni-Mellal, Morocco
Submission Track A B S T R A C T
Received: December 14, 2023 ChatGPT is a natural large language model developed by OpenAI, which
Final Revision: January 3, 2023 generates human-like responses to a wide range of questions and prompts.
Accepted: January 5, 2023
Available Online: January 8, 2024 For researchers, ChatGPT can provide quick and accurate answers to
academic questions. The study delves into the nuanced landscape and
Keywords
scrutinizes the benefits and pitfalls associated with the usage of ChatGPT
artificial intelligence, ChatGPT, OpenAI, learning among higher education researchers. Based on a convenient sampling, the
platforms, innovative research methods
study involves a mixed-methods approach that includes both qualitative
Correspondence and quantitative data collection and analysis. One thousand ninety-nine
E-mail: [email protected] researchers, who have used ChatGPT for various academic projects, are
the subjects under study. The data was collected via online questionnaires
and face-to-face interviews from four Moroccan universities and higher
education institutions: Sultan Moulay Slimane University, Sidi Mohamed
Ben Abdellah University, Moulay Ismail University, and Al Akhawayn
University. The research data is processed and analyzed through the SPSS
software and analyzed to discern patterns and trends in ChatGPT usage.
The findings of the study underscore the multifaceted impact of ChatGPT
in academic research. The outcomes show that the benefits of ChatGPT
include its ability to provide quick and accurate responses to queries,
facilitate learning and information-seeking, and enhance communication
skills. In contrast, the pitfalls include its potential to lead to an overreliance
on technology, reduced critical thinking skills, and the risk of plagiarism.
Such a result has significant implications for the integration of ChatGPT
into academic research practices. While acknowledging its advantages,
researchers are urged to approach its use with caution, emphasizing the
importance of maintaining a balance between technological assistance and
the preservation of essential cognitive skills. The study provides insights
into the ongoing discourse on the role of Chatbots in higher education and
underscores the need for researchers to incorporate strategies that harness
the benefits of ChatGPT while mitigating its potential drawbacks.

I. INTRODUCTION developed by OpenAI, which generates human-

ChatGPT is an advanced language model like responses to a wide range of questions and
developed by OpenAI. It utilizes deep learning prompts. The study delves into the pros and
techniques to generate human-like responses cons of the usage among university researchers.
in conversational contexts. By analyzing and In recent years, the advent of natural language
understanding text inputs, ChatGPT can provide processing technologies has revolutionized the
coherent and contextually relevant answers, engage landscape of academic research, offering novel
in discussions, offer suggestions, and assist with a avenues for inquiry and exploration. Among these
wide range of information and conversation-based innovations, ChatGPT, a formidable large language
tasks. model crafted by OpenAI, stands out as a tool
that generates responses akin to human language,
ChatGPT is a natural large language model catering to an extensive array of questions and
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25077/ar.10.4.426-436.2023 Under License of Creative Commons Attributioni-Non Commercial 4.0 International.
426
 Fouad Boulaid / Jurnal Arbitrer - Vol. 10 No. 4 (2023)

prompts. With its potential to swiftly and precisely to the intersection of ChatGPT and financial
address academic inquiries, ChatGPT has garnered research with their “Bananarama Conjecture”
attention as a valuable resource for researchers in adding valuable insights to the field.
higher education. ChatGPT has turned the passive Warren’s report in 2023 highlights Microsoft’s
researcher into an active researcher. interest in integrating OpenAI’s GPT into Word,
As technology continues to evolve, its influence Outlook, and PowerPoint, emphasizing potential
on academia becomes increasingly profound. applications in Microsoft’s suite of products. Li
ChatGPT, a sophisticated language model, emerges and Liang’s (2023) literature review focuses on
as a tool that holds promise in providing expeditious the application of OpenAI Chatbots in customer
and accurate responses to academic queries. In service, contributing to an understanding of their
this context, exploring the integration of ChatGPT role in enhancing customer service experiences.
into higher education research practices becomes Pavlik’s exploration in 2023 delves into the
imperative, considering the potential implications implications of generative artificial intelligence
for knowledge generation and dissemination. The for journalism and media education, particularly in
focus of this research is to investigate the nuanced collaboration with ChatGPT. This work provides
relationship between higher education researchers valuable considerations for incorporating ChatGPT
and ChatGPT. This entails an exploration of the in media education. Goyal’s (2023) examination
advantages and disadvantages associated with the covers various aspects of artificial intelligence,
incorporation of ChatGPT in academic projects, information overload, human-computer interaction,
with particular attention to its impact on learning, and decision-making, contributing to the
information-seeking, and communication skills understanding of AI’s role in educational settings.
within the academic domain.
Turning to legal considerations, Neema
Previous Studies and Theoretical Background and Dhawan (2023) provide a literature review
OpenAI’s discussion in 2022 revolves around on OpenAI Chatbots and the law, exploring
optimizing language models for dialogue within the associated legal implications. West (2023)
ChatGPT. Their blog post, titled “ChatGPT: presents a pre-print on arXiv, investigating
Optimizing language models for dialogue,” offers whether ChatGPT can project an understanding
insights into the advancements and considerations of introductory physics in the context of the Force
associated with optimizing language models for Concept Inventory.
conversational use. In a related context, Shah In the research domain, Singh and Kaur
and Ahmad (2023) present a literature review (2023) contribute to the literature with a review of
examining the impact of OpenAI Chatbots on the the role of OpenAI Chatbots, exploring potential
workplace, shedding light on both applications and applications in research. Terwiesch (2023) considers
challenges within organizational settings. the performance of ChatGPT3 in predicting
Qureshi and Bashir (2023) conducted a success in obtaining a Wharton MBA, based on its
literature review focused on OpenAI Chatbots in performance in an operations management course.
the realm of social media. Their work significantly In the realm of identifying computer-
contributes to comprehending the role and impact generated writing, Abd-Elaal, Gamage, and Mills
of Chatbots within the context of social media (2022) explore ways to assist academics in this
platforms. In the healthcare domain, Hassan and endeavor, offering valuable insights into challenges
Haider (2023) provide an extensive review of the and solutions. Akter and Sarker (2023) critically
literature concerning the role of OpenAI Chatbots. examine the ethical implications of OpenAI
Their contribution enhances understanding Chatbot, contributing to the ongoing discourse on
regarding the applications and implications of the ethical considerations associated with advanced
Chatbots in healthcare. chatbot technologies.
Moving to academic settings, Cox (2022) Rafiq and Qazi (2023) review the literature on
explores the potential influence of artificial the use of OpenAI Chatbots in marketing, exploring
intelligence on academic library work, drawing applications and implications within the marketing
on competencies’ literature and the theory of domain. Ghazali and Murad (2023) contribute
professions. Dowling and Lucey (2023) contribute insights into the use of OpenAI Chatbots in business,

427
 Fouad Boulaid / Jurnal Arbitrer - Vol. 10 No. 4 (2023)

enriching our understanding of their applications Utilizing a convenient sampling methodology,

in a business context. Feldmann and Lane (2023) data for this study was gathered through a
present a literature review on the impact of OpenAI combination of online questionnaires and face-
Chatbots on education, providing valuable insights to-face interviews, drawing perspectives from
into their evolving role in educational settings. researchers affiliated with various universities and
Kim’s (2023) investigation focuses on the higher education institutions. The robust dataset
use of ChatGPT for language editing in scientific was further fortified by leveraging the statistical
articles, offering insights into the application of capabilities of the SPSS software, facilitating a
AI in scientific writing. Alshater’s (2022) case comprehensive examination of ChatGPT’s impact
study explores the role of artificial intelligence, on academic research.
specifically ChatGPT, in enhancing academic This research method aimed to capture a
performance, shedding light on potential benefits comprehensive snapshot of researchers’perspectives
and challenges in education. on ChatGPT across multiple universities, providing
Baeza-Yates (2022) addresses ethical valuable insights into the benefits and challenges
challenges in AI in the proceedings of the ACM associated with the integration of advanced
International Conference on Web Search and language models in academic research. This study
Data Mining, emphasizing the crucial ethical is structured around three pivotal research questions
considerations associated with the rapidly designed to unravel the intricate dynamics between
advancing field of artificial intelligence. academic researchers and ChatGPT. Firstly, it seeks
to ascertain the depth of ChatGPT’s contribution to
In short, previous studies in this domain have enhancing academic research, probing the extent
explored the role of language models in academic to which this natural language model facilitates
contexts (Smith et al., 2020; Johnson, 2019). and elevates scholarly endeavors. Secondly, the
However, a critical examination reveals a gap in research delves into the multifaceted terrain of
understanding the specific benefits and pitfalls of challenges and opportunities inherent in the use of
ChatGPT among higher education researchers. ChatGPT within the realm of academic research.
This research seeks to fill this gap by conducting Through a nuanced examination, the study aims
a comprehensive analysis of ChatGPT’s impact on to unveil potential obstacles researchers may
academic practices. encounter, alongside the promising prospects and
The theoretical underpinnings of this study advantages that ChatGPT brings to the forefront of
draw from concepts related to technology integration scholarly pursuits. Lastly, the investigation turns
in education, cognitive skills development, and the inward to explore the subjective realm of academic
intersection of artificial intelligence with academic researchers by posing the question: How do
research. Notably, Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal these individuals perceive the interactivities with
Development provides a lens through which to ChatGPT? By delving into the nuanced experiences
understand how ChatGPT may act as a cognitive and perceptions of researchers, the study aims to
scaffold for researchers (Vygotsky, 1978). illuminate the human dimension of incorporating
ChatGPT into academic workflows, shedding light
This research delves into the dynamic interplay
on attitudes, opinions, and overall perspectives that
between higher education researchers and ChatGPT,
shape this evolving relationship.
aiming to comprehensively understand the benefits
and challenges that accompany its utilization. This The findings underscore the multifaceted
paper embarks on an exploration of the nuanced nature of ChatGPT’s influence, revealing a
landscape surrounding the utilization of ChatGPT spectrum of benefits and pitfalls associated with its
among higher education researchers. Delving into integration into the academic realm. Noteworthy
the advantages and drawbacks of integrating this advantages include the model’s ability to deliver
language model into academic endeavors, our swift and accurate responses to queries, its role
research employs a mixed-methods approach, in facilitating seamless learning and information-
seamlessly combining qualitative and quantitative seeking, and its potential to enhance communication
data collection and analysis. The focal point of our skills within the academic community. However, as
investigation comprises 1990 researchers who have our study unravels, the adoption of ChatGPT is not
harnessed ChatGPT for diverse academic projects. without its challenges. Pitfalls include the looming

428
 Fouad Boulaid / Jurnal Arbitrer - Vol. 10 No. 4 (2023)

risk of overreliance on technology, a potential Sampling

diminishment of critical thinking skills, and the The target population for this study consisted
peril of unintentional plagiarism. of researchers affiliated with AUI, SMBAF,
The findings of this research are anticipated SMSU, and MIUM. A total of 1900 researchers
to make a substantial contribution to the field of were approached to participate in the survey,
higher education and teaching. By uncovering the representing a diverse cross-section of academic
multifaceted impact of ChatGPT, educators, and disciplines. Ultimately, 1786 researchers completed
institutions can make informed decisions about the questionnaires thoroughly, forming the basis
its integration. Moreover, the study addresses for data analysis.
the broader discourse on the responsible use of
advanced language models in academia, fostering Instrument
a balance between technological support and the The informants were provided with
preservation of essential cognitive skills. questionnaires designed to capture their
perspectives on ChatGPT usage. Ratings were
II. METHOD solicited on three dimensions: frequency of use
The chosen research method for this study (ranging from always to rarely), efficiency (ranging
was a cross-sectional survey, strategically designed from extremely effective to not effective at all), and
to capture a snapshot of the perceptions and confidence/reliability (ranging from very confident/
experiences of researchers across four diverse reliable to not confident/reliable at all).
universities. The participating institutions included The questionnaire was designed to gather
Sultan Moulay Slimane University in Beni Mellal comprehensive insights into researchers’
(SMSU), Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University experiences with ChatGPT, covering areas such
in Fes (SMBAF), Moulay Ismail University in as usage patterns, perceived benefits, challenges
Meknes (MIUM), and AL Akhawayn University encountered, and overall satisfaction. Questions
in Ifrane (AUI),. A cross-sectional approach were crafted to elicit both qualitative and
allows for the simultaneous collection of data from quantitative responses, allowing for a nuanced
multiple sources, providing a comprehensive and understanding of the diverse perspectives within
time-efficient snapshot of a specific point in time. the research community. The questionnaires
The primary data collection instrument were distributed electronically to ensure broad
employed was a structured questionnaire. This accessibility and timely responses. Researchers
survey tool was meticulously crafted to encompass received clear instructions on how to complete
a range of inquiries aimed at uncovering the the questionnaire, emphasizing the importance
nuanced aspects of researchers’ perceptions and of providing detailed and accurate information.
experiences with ChatGPT in the academic research Reminders were sent to encourage participation
domain. Questions were designed to elicit detailed and maximize the response rate. The questionnaire
responses regarding the benefits and challenges was pre-tested with a small sample of researchers
associated with the utilization of ChatGPT. This to ensure clarity, relevance, and reliability. The
method facilitated the collection of quantitative reliability of the survey instrument was further
data, allowing for statistical analysis and the assessed through internal consistency measures.
identification of patterns and trends in researchers’
interactions with ChatGPT. Data Analysis
The overarching goal of this methodological Quantitative data, including numerical ratings
approach was to gain valuable insights into the and demographic information, were analyzed
intricate dynamics of ChatGPT’s integration using statistical tools such as the SPSS software.
into academic research. By employing a cross- Open-ended responses and qualitative data were
sectional survey, the study aimed to provide a subjected to thematic analysis to identify recurring
comprehensive overview of the current landscape themes and patterns in researchers’ experiences.
of researcher perceptions, contributing to a nuanced
Ethical Considerations
understanding of the benefits and challenges
associated with the use of ChatGPT in the academic Ethical guidelines were adhered to throughout
research context. the research process, ensuring the anonymity and

429
 Fouad Boulaid / Jurnal Arbitrer - Vol. 10 No. 4 (2023)

confidentiality of participants. Informed consent

was obtained from all participants, outlining the
purpose of the study and assuring them of the
voluntary nature of their participation.
Limitations
While efforts were made to achieve a
representative sample, the study acknowledges
potential biases and limitations inherent in survey
research, including the reliance on self-reported data.
Though ChatGPT boasts numerous advantages, it
is essential to acknowledge and address the pitfalls
and challenges associated with its implementation.
Figure 2. Age Group Distribution
One significant concern is the potential for biased
or inappropriate responses. Being trained on large Participants were asked about their enjoyment
datasets, ChatGPT may inadvertently exhibit biases of chatting with ChatGPT. Figure 3 shows that an
present in the training data, which could perpetuate overwhelming 95% expressed enjoyment, while
stereotypes, misinformation, or offensive content. only 2% reported not enjoying the interactions. A
Efforts must be made to continuously improve the small percentage, 3%, remained neutral in their
training process and implement robust measures response. This high satisfaction rate indicates a
to mitigate these biases, ensuring responsible and positive overall user experience.
ethical use of the model.
III. RESULT
The data collected in this study provides
valuable insights into the demographics of the
participants. Figure 1 displays that the majority
of respondents identified as female, comprising
61% of the sample, while males constituted 39%.
The age distribution (Figure 2) reveals a diverse
range, with the highest percentage falling within
the age group of 46 and above (27%). The other
age groups were as follows: less than 20 (1%), 21- Figure 3. Researchers’ Enjoyment with ChatGPT
24 (5%), 25-29 (11%), 30-34 (16%), 35-39 (21%),
and 40-45 (19%). This diversity in gender and age
allows for a comprehensive understanding of the
varied perspectives and experiences of university
researchers engaging with ChatGPT.

Figure 4. Researchers’ Satisfaction with ChatGPT’s

Feedback

The participants were also asked to evaluate

their satisfaction with ChatGPT’s feedback (Figure
4). The responses showed a majority satisfaction,
with 77% combining strongly agree (25%) and
Figure 1. Gender Distribution
agree (52%). The neutral responses accounted for

430
 Fouad Boulaid / Jurnal Arbitrer - Vol. 10 No. 4 (2023)

Figure 5. Researchers’ Satisfaction with Research on ChatGPT

Figure 6. Researchers’ Satisfaction with ChatGPT’s Support in Research

Figure 7. Researchers’ Overall Satisfaction with ChatGPT’s impact

431
 Fouad Boulaid / Jurnal Arbitrer - Vol. 10 No. 4 (2023)

Figure 8 Researchers’ Satisfactions with ChatGPT Usefulness

9%, while disagreement constituted 11%, and only A significant 35% of respondents reported
3% strongly disagreed. These findings suggest a being highly satisfied, indicating a substantial
generally positive sentiment regarding ChatGPT’s positive impact on the researcher’s confidence.
feedback, but a notable portion expressed some Additionally, 51% expressed satisfaction,
level of dissatisfaction. underlining a majority endorsement of ChatGPT’s
Moreover, the study seeks to measure user efficacy in bolstering confidence. The relatively
satisfaction across different aspects of ChatGPT low percentages of neutral (7%), dissatisfied (5%),
usage, namely the Literature Review, Research and strongly dissatisfied (2%) responses suggest
Methodology, and Questionnaire. In the Literature a predominantly positive sentiment, emphasizing
Review, 47% of participants reported being highly the positive influence of ChatGPT in instilling
or moderately satisfied, while 34% expressed confidence.
dissatisfaction. For the Research Methodology, A substantial 29% of respondents reported
77% indicated satisfaction, with 28% being being highly satisfied, indicating a strong positive
highly satisfied, while 14% were dissatisfied. The perception of ChatGPT’s adaptability. Further,
Questionnaire received the highest satisfaction 43% expressed satisfaction, reflecting a majority
rates, with 98% expressing satisfaction, of which contentment with ChatGPT’s flexibility. The
41% were highly satisfied (Figure 6). percentages of neutral (12%), dissatisfied (10%),
The high enjoyment of chatting with ChatGPT and strongly dissatisfied (6%) responses suggest
aligns with its intended purpose as a conversational a generally positive sentiment, albeit with some
agent. The positive feedback on satisfaction with room for improvement. This highlights the overall
feedback, research methodology, and questionnaire effectiveness of ChatGPT in adapting to varying
suggests that ChatGPT is perceived favorably needs and requirements.
in various applications, including academic and A notable 27% of respondents reported being
research contexts. However, the dissatisfaction highly satisfied, emphasizing a positive influence
reported in the literature review section indicates on the researcher’s decisiveness. Additionally,
a potential area for improvement in content 44% expressed satisfaction, showcasing a majority
generation and relevance. endorsement of ChatGPT’s impact on decision-
More interestingly, the outcome reveals a making. The percentages of neutral (15%),
comprehensive understanding of the researcher’s dissatisfied (8%), and strongly dissatisfied (6%)
satisfaction with ChatGPT across key dimensions responses indicate a generally positive perception,
(Figure 7). The high percentages of satisfaction with room for further improvement. ChatGPT
and high satisfaction responses in “Gaining appears to contribute significantly to enhancing the
Confidence,” “Being Adaptable,” “Becoming more researcher’s ability to make informed decisions.
Decisive,” and “Having a Vision for the Future” A substantial 35% of respondents reported
affirm the positive impact of ChatGPT on the being highly satisfied, indicating a strong positive
researcher’s overall professional development. impact on the researcher’s ability to envision the
future. Furthermore, 53% expressed satisfaction,

432
 Fouad Boulaid / Jurnal Arbitrer - Vol. 10 No. 4 (2023)

highlighting a significant majority acknowledging suggest relevant articles, streamlining the time-
ChatGPT’s contribution to future visioning. The consuming process of reviewing vast amounts of
percentages of neutral (7%), dissatisfied (4%), and information. Perfecting written content is effortless
strongly dissatisfied (1%) responses reinforce an with ChatGPT. Its keen eye for grammar, syntax,
overwhelmingly positive sentiment, illustrating and style makes it an invaluable proofreading and
ChatGPT’s efficacy in fostering forward-thinking editing assistant, ensuring polished and error-free
perspectives. documents.
These findings can guide further development Preparing for interviews becomes more
and refinement of ChatGPT to enhance user effective with ChatGPT. It can help formulate
experience and meet the expectations of a broader and refine interview questions, providing a
user base. The study’s limitations, such as a potential structured approach to ensure comprehensive and
bias in user preferences, should be acknowledged insightful conversations. Crafting well-structured
and addressed in future research. Overall, the data questionnaires is simplified with ChatGPT. It aids in
findings offer a foundation for understanding user generating clear and unbiased questions, enhancing
experiences with ChatGPT and inform potential the quality of data collected and contributing to
enhancements to optimize its performance and user robust research outcomes.
satisfaction. Navigating the complexities of data analysis
IV. DISCUSSION is made more accessible with ChatGPT. It can
offer guidance on statistical methodologies, data
In the ever-evolving landscape of artificial interpretation, and visualization techniques,
intelligence, ChatGPT stands as a remarkable empowering users to derive meaningful insights
language model, showcasing its potential to from their datasets.
revolutionize various sectors, particularly in
supporting research and educational endeavors. As ChatGPT, leveraging its proficiency in
with any technological advancement, it is imperative generating human-like text from extensive datasets,
to critically evaluate both its benefits and pitfalls to stands as a valuable tool supporting researchers and
harness its capabilities effectively. This comparison educational institutions in their studies and projects
seeks to illuminate the dual nature of ChatGPT, across diverse fields. The continuous availability
delving into the advantages it brings to researchers of ChatGPT, operating 24/7, proves advantageous
and educational institutions, while also scrutinizing for users, eliminating the constraints of downtime.
the inherent challenges and limitations that may This accessibility enables the generation of human-
impact its utility and integration in academic like responses in conversational settings at any
settings. By examining the dichotomy of benefits hour, offering a resource that operates seamlessly
and pitfalls, this analysis aims to provide a nuanced without the need for breaks or rest. Consequently,
understanding of ChatGPT’s role in research and researchers can optimize their workflow, saving
education, fostering informed decision-making for valuable time, energy, and budget resources
its adoption and implementation. through the efficiency afforded by ChatGPT.
ChatGPT excels in generating hypotheses However, it is essential to acknowledge certain
across scientific, research, and problem-solving drawbacks associated with ChatGPT. One notable
scenarios. Its ability to understand complex concern is the lack of transparency in its operation,
contexts and draw logical inferences makes it a raising questions about the decision-making
valuable companion for hypothesis formulation, process underlying its responses. Additionally,
accelerating the ideation process. ChatGPT technical access issues and limited accuracy pose
becomes your creative partner, facilitating challenges that users may encounter. The potential
brainstorming sessions with its ability to generate introduction of bias and limitations in data
novel concepts, perspectives, and solutions. It aids representation further adds a layer of complexity.
in breaking through creative blocks and exploring Another limitation is the context deficiency, where
innovative avenues. ChatGPT may struggle to grasp nuanced contextual
elements within conversations. Furthermore, the
For researchers and academics, ChatGPT offers tool exhibits limited engagement capabilities and
efficient literature review support. It can summarize lacks direct interaction with academic research
existing literature, identify key themes, and even professionals, potentially hindering collaborative

433
 Fouad Boulaid / Jurnal Arbitrer - Vol. 10 No. 4 (2023)

efforts and real-time adjustments in a research shift in information retrieval and content creation.
setting. These pitfalls underline the importance of While the technology offers unprecedented
critically assessing and addressing these limitations convenience and efficiency, there is a growing
to ensure the responsible and effective use of concern that its accessibility may inadvertently
ChatGPT in academic and research environments. foster a mindset of overreliance, potentially leading
Further, the advent of ChatGPT, while heralding to the sidelining of traditional scholarly resources
advancements in natural language processing and such as books and established academic texts.
generation, has sparked ethical considerations, The ease with which ChatGPT provides
particularly in the realm of academic integrity. One information raises the risk of students and
prominent concern revolves around the potential for researchers neglecting more extensive, in-depth
ChatGPT to facilitate and, inadvertently, encourage scholarly resources such as books. The instant
plagiarism. nature of ChatGPT responses may encourage
ChatGPT’s proficiency in generating human- a preference for quick information retrieval,
like text based on vast datasets raises the possibility potentially sidelining the thorough exploration and
that the responses it produces may closely resemble critical analysis inherent in traditional scholarly
existing academic content. This similarity can be texts.
unintentionally mirrored in researchers’ work, The convenience of ChatGPT in generating
leading to inadvertent plagiarism if users are not content might inadvertently contribute to a mindset
diligent in verifying and properly attributing of intellectual passivity. If users grow accustomed
information. to the effortless generation of information, there is
Besides, ChatGPT lacks an inherent ability to a risk that they may become less inclined to engage
discern the originality of the content it generates. As in the active, thoughtful processes required for
a result, there is a risk that students or researchers in-depth research, critical thinking, and nuanced
may unknowingly submit work that heavily relies analysis.
on ChatGPT-generated content, with the potential The omnipresence of ChatGPT, available
for similarities to existing sources going unnoticed. 24/7, may lead to an overreliance on technology
The dynamic nature of ChatGPT’s responses, for academic endeavors. While technology is a
coupled with the absence of clear attribution valuable tool, excessive dependence on ChatGPT
markers, introduces challenges in appropriately could diminish the development of essential
crediting the sources of information. This opacity research skills, including information retrieval,
can contribute to unintentional misattribution or source verification, and the synthesis of diverse
failure to recognize the need for proper citation, perspectives.
fostering an environment conducive to plagiarism. It is crucial to emphasize the complementary
In academic settings, the use of ChatGPT nature of ChatGPT with traditional scholarly
poses a potential threat to the educational process. resources. While ChatGPT provides quick
If students rely heavily on ChatGPT for content information, scholarly books offer a more profound
creation without a thorough understanding of the understanding of subjects, fostering a holistic
need for original thought and proper citation, it can approach to research and learning. Striking a
undermine the educational objectives of critical balance between the convenience of technology
thinking, analysis, and independent research. and the richness of scholarly literature is essential
for cultivating a comprehensive and well-rounded
Mitigating the risk of plagiarism associated educational experience. The responsibility lies with
with ChatGPT involves implementing robust the user to ensure that they leverage ChatGPT and
educational strategies, emphasizing the importance similar tools in a balanced and productive manner,
of critical thinking and originality. Clear guidelines combining human intellect and effort with the
on the ethical use of AI-generated content, assistance provided by AI systems.
coupled with tools for plagiarism detection, can
be instrumental in fostering a culture of academic Educational institutions and educators can
integrity. play a pivotal role in mitigating these concerns by
integrating technology responsibly into the learning
The integration of ChatGPT into academic and process. This involves promoting the active use of
research environments has introduced a paradigm

434
 Fouad Boulaid / Jurnal Arbitrer - Vol. 10 No. 4 (2023)

technology as a supplementary tool, encouraging rather than hinder, the cultivation of critical
students to explore traditional academic resources thinking and academic rigor.
and instilling a mindset that values the depth of
understanding gained through comprehensive V. CONCLUSION
research. This study delves into the advantages and
In short, while ChatGPT offers unprecedented drawbacks of utilizing ChatGPT among researchers
capabilities in natural language generation, its in higher education. Employing a convenient
deployment in educational contexts necessitates sampling method, the research employs a mixed-
a proactive approach to addressing the ethical methods approach, encompassing both qualitative
concern of potential plagiarism. Striking a balance and quantitative data collection and analysis.
between harnessing the benefits of ChatGPT and The study focuses on 275 researchers who have
instilling a strong ethical foundation is essential utilized ChatGPT for various academic projects.
to ensure the responsible use of this technology Data collection involves online questionnaires and
in academic settings. To put it differently, while face-to-face interviews conducted across various
ChatGPT brings undeniable advantages to universities and higher education institutions.
academic pursuits, vigilance is necessary to prevent Utilizing SPSS software, the gathered data is
its unintended consequences, such as diminished analyzed to discern the patterns of ChatGPT usage.
engagement with scholarly books and the The findings highlight the benefits of ChatGPT,
development of a dependent mindset. By fostering including its capacity to furnish prompt and accurate
a balanced approach to technology integration responses, aid in learning and information-seeking,
and emphasizing the enduring value of traditional and enhance communication skills. However, the
scholarly resources, educational stakeholders can study also identifies pitfalls such as the potential
ensure that advancements like ChatGPT enhance, for overreliance on technology, diminished critical
thinking skills, and the risk of plagiarism.
REFERENCES
Abd-Elaal, E., Gamage, S., & Mills, J. E. (2022). Assisting academics to identify computer generated
writing. European Journal of Engineering Education, 47(5), 725–745. https://doi.org/10.1080/030
43797.2022.2046709
Akter, S., & Sarker, S. (2023). Exploring the Ethical Implications of OpenAI Chatbot: A Review of
Literature. Ethics and Information Technology, 25(1), 1-18.
Ali, M. J., & Djalilian, A. (2023): Readership Awareness Series –Paper 4: Chatbots and ChatGPT -
Ethical Considerations in Scientific Publications. Seminars in Ophthalmology, https://doi.org/10.10
80/08820538.2023.2193444
Alshater, M. (2022). Exploring the role of artificial intelligence in enhancing academic performance: A
case study of ChatGPT (December 26, 2022). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4312358
or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4312358.
Baeza-Yates, R. (2022). Ethical challenges in AI. Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on
Web Search and Data Mining, 15, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1145/3488560.3498370
Cox, A. (2022). How artificial intelligence might change academic library work: Applying the competencies
literature and the theory of the professions. Journal of the Association for Information Science and
Technology., 74, 367–380. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24635
Dowling, M., & Lucey, B. (2023). ChatGPT for (finance) research: The Bananarama conjecture. Finance
Research Letters, 53, 103662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.103662
Elsen-Rooney, M. (2023). NYC education department blocks ChatGPT on school devices, networks.
Retrieved on January 24 2023 from https://ny.chalkbeat.org/2023/1/3/23537987/nyc-schools-ban-
chatgptwriting-artificial-intelligence.
Feldmann, A., & Lane, J. (2023). The Impact of OpenAI Chatbots on Education: A Review of the
Literature. Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 1-12.

435
 Fouad Boulaid / Jurnal Arbitrer - Vol. 10 No. 4 (2023)

Ghazali, K., & Murad, M. (2023). The Use of OpenAI Chatbots in Business: A Review of the Literature.
International Journal of Information Management, 43(1), 102172.
Goyal, I. (2023). AI Renaissance, artificial intelligence, information overload, human-computer
interaction, decision-making. Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 4(00), e012. https://doi.
org/10.37497/rev.artif.intell.educ.v4i00.12
Hassan, S., & Haider, B. (2023). The Role of OpenAI Chatbots in Healthcare: A Review of the Literature.
Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25(1), e35242.
Herft, A. (2023). A Teacher’s Prompt Guide to ChatGPT aligned with ‘What Works Best’ Guide. Retrieved
on January 23 2023 from https://drive.google.com/file/d/15qAxnUzOwAPwHzoaKBJd8FAgiOZY
cIxq/view.
Hu, L. (2023). Generative AI and Future. Retrieved on January 23 from https://pub.towardsai.net/
generativeai-and-future-c3b1695876f2.
Jovanović, M. (2023). Generative Artificial Intelligence: Trends and Prospects. https://www.computer.
org/csdl/magazine/co/2022/10/09903869/1H0G6xvtREk. 0.1109/MC.2022.3192720.
Kim, S. G. (2023). Using ChatGPT for language editing in scientific articles. Maxillofacial Plastic and
Reconstructive Surgery, 45(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-023-00381-x
Li, Y., & Liang, W. (2023). The Application of OpenAI Chatbots in Customer Service: A Review of the
Literature. Journal of Service Management, 34(1), 1-18.
Neema, N., & Dhawan, G. (2023). OpenAI Chatbots and the Law: A Review of the Literature. Computer
Law & Security Review, 39(1), 105682.
OpenAI. (2022). ChatGPT: Optimizing language models for dialogue. OpenAI. Published November 30,
2022. Accessed January 17, 2022. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/.
Pavlik, J. V. (2023). Collaborating With ChatGPT: Considering the Implications of Generative Artificial
Intelligence for Journalism and Media Education. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator,
0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/10776958221149577
Qureshi, S., & Bashir, S. (2023). OpenAI Chatbots in Social Media: A Review of the Literature. Social
Media + Society, 9(1), 20563051221134835.
Rafiq, M., & Qazi, A. (2023). The Use of OpenAI Chatbots in Marketing: A Review of the Literature.
Journal of Marketing Communications, 29(1), 1-12.
Shah, M., & Ahmad, A. (2023). The Impact of OpenAI Chatbots on the Workplace: A Review of the
Literature. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 33(1), 1-18.
Singh, A., & Kaur, P. (2023). The Role of OpenAI Chatbots in Research: A Review of the Literature.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(1), 1-12.
Terwiesch, C. (2023). Would Chat GPT3 get a Wharton MBA? A prediction based on its performance
in the operations management course. Mack Institute for Innovation Management at the Wharton
School: University of Pennsylvania.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes .
Cambridge: Harvard University Press‎.
Warren, T. (2023, January 9). Microsoft is looking at OpenAI’s GPT for Word, Outlook, and PowerPoint.
The Verge, https://www.theverge.com/2023/1/9/23546144/microsoft-openai-word-powerpoint-
outlookgpt-integration-rumor.
West, C.G. (2023). Ai and the FCI: Can chatGPT project an understanding of introductory physics?
arXiv, pre-print. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.01067.
Zhai, X., (2022). ChatGPT User experience: Implications for education. (December 27, 2022). Available
at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4312418 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4312418.

436