20250320-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To Buloke Shire Council & Ors
20250320-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To Buloke Shire Council & Ors
1
2
3 Buloke Shire Council & Ors 20-3-2025
4 [email protected]
5
6 Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
7 [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
8
9 Re: 20250320-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Buloke Shire Council & Ors
10
11 NOT RESTRICTED FOR PUBLICATION
12
13 Sir/Madam & Ors,
14 as for your 25-2-2025 purported demand for $596.25 I at no time authorised
15 Buloke Shire Council to enter my properties and neither so any other person without my consent.
16 Hence, your allegations only prove trespassing/vandalism, etc, and so by more than one person
17 to conspire to do so and to interfere with my FEE SIMPLE rights. I remind you of previous
18 warnings that any further demands attract common law compensation claims and double that
19 added where 2 or more person conspired to do so.
20 I refer to my previous many correspondences and as I indicated to Premier Jacinta Allen all
21 and any common law compensation charges not then paid within 14 days would be doubled.
22
23 As I also previously made clear that I also rely upon the 19-6-2006 AEC v Schorel-Hlavka
24 successful appeals where neither the Commonwealth DPP and/or any of the 9 Attorney Generals
25 challenged my submissions, etc, including many constitutional issues and as such no court can
26 now interfere with these issues. Neither can any court intervene in any purported claims where it
27 is the last resort and so far, Buloke Shire Council and/or the Victorian Government Attorney
28 General has failed to show any details to prove me wrong.
29 As the State of Victoria since Federation lacked any valid constitution then all and any
30 legislation purportedly enacted is ULTRA VIRES AB INITO! Hence, any Victorian legislation
31 you may desire to rely upon may be ULTRA VIRES AB INITO!
32 As I made clear I dispute the jurisdiction of any Victorian Court, and in my view any
33 Government entity or any body claiming to act to enforce State government purported legislative
34 provisions better hand the matter over to the Victorian Attorney General, who for years is well
35 aware of matters!
36
37 For any farmer, etc, their FEE SIMPLE rights are also robbed as now (albeit unconstitutionally)
38 they are forced to pay huge sums of moneys to Aboriginals for being permitted to put a post at a
39 certain depth, clearly violating the Commonwealth v New South Wales [1923] HCA 34 (1923)
40 33 CLR 1 (9 August 1923) decision as to FEE SIMPLE right
41
42 https://constitutionwatch.com.au/fee-simple/ttps://constitutionwatch.com.au/fee-simple/
43 Commonwealth v New South Wales [1923] HCA 34 (1923) 33 CLR 1 (9 August 1923)
44 HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
45 KNOX C.J., ISAACS, HIGGINS, GAVAN DUFFY AND STARKE JJ.
46 THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA PLAINTIFF against
20-3-2025 Page 1 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
Page 2