RATING SCALE FOR INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS

Mentee: ____________________________________________________________Course & year: ____________

Subject Area: Teaching Mathematics in the Intermediate Grades (Mathematics) Major: EE
Subject Matter: _______________________________________________________________________________

Direction: On a scale of 1 to 3, where 3 is the highest and 1 is the lowest, please rate the student teacher’s
instructional material by encircling the number.

Statements Scale
1. The subject matter is written in bold font. 3 2 1
2. The objective of the lesson is written visibly. 3 2 1
3. There is consistent use of font style and font size to enhance readability. 3 2 1
4 Background, color, and layout of text and/or graphs enhance visual appeal. 3 2 1
5. The visual includes all information on the topic in organized fashion. 3 2 1
6. The visual aids are large enough to be clearly visible to the entire group. 3 2 1
7. The visual has creativity and is presented in a clear and concise manner with full 3 2 1
understanding of the subject.
8. The visual has correct spelling, punctuation, and grammar. 3 2 1
9. Proper syllabication and usage of capital letters are observed. 3 2 1
10. Main points are effectively supported, emphasized, and clarified with visual aids. 3 2 1
11. Captions, legends, and titles are used synergistically to facilitate student 3 2 1
understanding of the visual.
12. The materials incorporate resources beyond the school curriculum texts (e.g., 3 2 1
teacher- made materials, manipulative, resources from museums, cultural
centers, etc.).
13. Visuals/ activity sheets for group activities are reproduced based on groupings 3 2 1
In the lesson plan.
14. The instructional materials incorporate multimedia and technology. 3 2 1
15. Pictures/ figures are colorful to motivate viewers. 3 2 1
16. The designs used complement to the content. 3 2 1
17. The font style used fits to the learners’ age/grade level. 3 2 1
18. Proper spacing is observed all throughout. 3 2 1
19. Penmanship is clear, readable and eve friendly. 3 2 1
20. The test paper is written legibly. 3 2 1
21. The test type used follows the guidelines in test constructing test. 3 2 1
22. The slides for the powerpoint presentation follow the 6x6 rule. 3 2 1
23. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text in the slides. 3 2 1
24. The board plan is outlined to maximize the use of space on the board. 3 2 1
25. Plan “B” is prepared in case of power interruption. 3 2 1

Total Score: ______________

Comments/Suggestions:_________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

MARIA THALIA FE T. LUYAO SUBJECT TEACHER ______________

Signature over Printed Name Designation Date
 STUDENT TEACHER TEACHING COMPETENCIES RATING SCALE

Student Teacher: __________________________________________________Major: _____________________

School: Asian College Of Technology Grade/Year Level: ____________
Subject Area: Teaching Mathematics in the Intermediate Grades (Mathematics) Date: _________ Time: ________
Subject Matter: _______________________________________________________________________________

Direction: On a scale of 1 to 5, where 5 is the highest and 1 is the lowest, please rate the student teacher’s teaching
competencies by encircling the number.

AREAS/COMPETENCIES SCALE
A. Instructional Objectives
1. Defines objectives of the lesson clearly. 5 4 3 2 1
2. Makes the intent of the lesson clear to the pupils/students. 5 4 3 2 1
3. Uses course syllabus or Curriculum Guide as reference in setting objectives. 5 4 3 2 1
B. Subject Matter
1. Demonstrates in depth knowledge of the subject matter. 5 4 3 2 1
2. Designs interdisciplinary learning materials. 5 4 3 2 1
3. Selects appropriate content in accordance with the goals and objectives of the curriculum. 5 4 3 2 1
C. Instructional Strategies and Learning Activities
1. Engages pupils/students in generating knowledge through the use of cooperative/interactive 5 4 3 2 1
learning activities.
2. Employ types of questions appropriate to the level of concepts taught. 5 4 3 2 1
3. Nurtures the development of pupils/students critical thinking and independent problem 5 4 3 2 1
solving.
4. Designs instruction appropriate to pupils/students’ development learning styles. 5 4 3 2 1
5. Enhances learning through the use of a wide variety of materials, human and technological 5 4 3 2 1
resources.
6. Employs teaching approaches that are sensitive to the varied experiences of pupils/students 5 4 3 2 1
7. Uses instructional time efficiently and effectively. 5 4 3 2 1
D. Assessment of Pupils’/Students’ Learning
1. Uses questions as diagnostic tools. 5 4 3 2 1
2. Utilizes varied and appropriate formal and informal assessment techniques. 5 4 3 2 1
3. Makes the criteria for assessing the range of performance explicit to the pupils/students. 5 4 3 2 1
4. Assesses both individual and group performance. 5 4 3 2 1
E. Assignment
1. Provides interesting and meaningful assignments. 5 4 3 2 1
2. Makes clear to the pupils/students the aim and assigned task. 5 4 3 2 1
3. Provides clear directions, procedures, steps, cautions involved in the task. 5 4 3 2 1

Total Score: ____________ Rating: _________________

Comments/Suggestion:__________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Equivalent: 95 – 100 - Outstanding
89 – 94 - Very Satisfactory MARIA THALIA FE T. LUYAO
83 – 88 - Satisfactory Observer/Evaluator
78 – 82 - Fair
72 – 77 - Unsatisfactory SUBJECT TEACHER
71 and below – Failed Designation
 STUDENT TEACHER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM

Student Teacher: __________________________________________________Major: _____________________

School: Asian College Of Technology Grade/Year Level: ____________
Subject Area: Teaching Mathematics in the Intermediate Grades (Mathematics) Date: _________ Time: ________
Subject Matter: _______________________________________________________________________________

Direction: On a scale of 1 to 5, where 5 is the highest and 1 is the lowest, please rate the student teacher’s teaching
competencies by encircling the number.

AREAS SCALE
A. Professional Skills
1. Establishes clear objectives of the lessons according to curriculum standards. 5 4 3 2 1
2. Demonstrates in depth knowledge and understanding of subject matters. 5 4 3 2 1
3. Is proficient in the language of instruction. 5 4 3 2 1
4. Writes legibly and delivers subject matter content though effective communications. 5 4 3 2 1
5. Is keen in detecting any kind of misbehavior, discontent or boredom. 5 4 3 2 1
6. Uses a variety of effective teaching skills strategies and appropriate learning activities. 5 4 3 2 1
7. Has knowledge of the techniques of questioning and handling pupils’ answers and 5 4 3 2 1
responses.
8. Selects appropriate assessment tools and procedures for learning. 5 4 3 2 1
9. Gives meaningful and effective assignments. 5 4 3 2 1
B. Technical Skills
1. Ability to create and use multimedia content, such as presentations, videos, audio 5 4 3 2 1
recordings,and interactive simulations, to engage students and present information
effectively.
2. Has the ability to operate audio-visual equipment. 5 4 3 2 1
3. Has knowledge of the different kinds of instructional materials. 5 4 3 2 1
4. Has the skill to arrange the classroom to make it attractive and conducive to learning. 5 4 3 2 1
C. Personal Qualities
1. Sets example in moral and ethical behavior. 5 4 3 2 1
2. Shows interest in each pupil’s development. 5 4 3 2 1
3. Shows enthusiasm and validity in classroom performance. 5 4 3 2 1
D. Social Qualities
1. Has maintained pleasing personal appearance. 5 4 3 2 1
2. Accepts and responds positively to constructive criticisms. 5 4 3 2 1
3. Lightens up the session with clean humor or incorporates fun in the lesson. 5 4 3 2 1
4. Relates well with peers, superiors, parents, pupils and the community. 5 4 3 2 1

Total Score: ____________ Rating: _________________

Comments/Suggestion:__________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Equivalent: 95 – 100 - Outstanding
89 – 94 - Very Satisfactory MARIA THALIA FE T. LUYAO
83 – 88 - Satisfactory Observer/Evaluator
78 – 82 - Fair
72 – 77 - Unsatisfactory SUBJECT TEACHER
71 and below – Failed Designation