0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views

writing 3

The bar chart compares household sizes in Britain from 1981 to 2001, showing an increase in one and two-person households while larger households declined. Two-person households remained the most common, growing from 31% to 34%, while one-person households rose from 13% to 26%. In contrast, households with three or more members saw a decrease in popularity during the same period.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views

writing 3

The bar chart compares household sizes in Britain from 1981 to 2001, showing an increase in one and two-person households while larger households declined. Two-person households remained the most common, growing from 31% to 34%, while one-person households rose from 13% to 26%. In contrast, households with three or more members saw a decrease in popularity during the same period.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 16

The bar chart illustrates how American, Canadian, England and Japan

managed their spendings on five main daily activities in 2009. From an


overall perspective, it is evident that all the countries consumed the most
on housing and food while the opposite was true for healthcare and
clothing. In terms of transportation, the usage of those countries were
recorded with varying degrees.
To begin with housing, the U.S accounted for the biggest percentage at
25%, which was being higher than the other countries by only a minimal
gap of below 5%. Turning to health care, the highest point still occurring in
the U.S but it would not be promising figures as all the countries ranged
from under 5% to below 10%.
In terms of health care and clothing, United States and Canada earned the
highest rates with around 8% and 6% respectively. With other countries, it
would not be promising figures as all the percentages followed the
comparable pattern in 2 categories took up to just below 10%.
During the same interval,

The bar chart describes spending in five lifestyle categories for residents
of four different nations in 2009. Looking from an overall perspective, it is
readily apparent that housing, food, and transportation are the biggest
expenses in nearly all countries, with those in the United States spending
the most on their homes and those in Japan the most on food. Healthcare
and clothing are smaller expenses and transportation is a greater
expenditure than food in only Canada and the US.

Expenditure on food ranged from a low of 14% in the United States to a


high of 22% for Japan, with Canada (15%) and the UK (21%) in between.
Housing costs represented at least a slightly higher percentage in all
countries: 26% in the US, 24% in the UK, 21% in Japan, and 20% in
Canada. The numbers were more variable for transportation as Canada
stood at 20%, just above the USA at 19% while the UK and Japan were
lower at 15% and 10%, respectively.

In terms of healthcare, by far the most is allocated for medical expenses


in the USA (8%) while all other countries are below 5%. For clothing,
Canada spends the most of their income (7%), followed by the UK (6%),
Japan (4%), and finally the United States (3%).

Ranging variate represent the low of took up to varying degrees follow the
same pattern
The chart illustrates the habit of experiencing services in fast food
restaurants of American over 10 years’ time starting from 2003. From an
overall perspective, people in the USA were most likely to go to fast food
restaurant one a week or once or twice a month. The least was allocated
to American deciding to go on everyday or hadn’t eaten once. Moreover,
in terms of daily customers or unexperienced clients decreased to varying
degrees, the year of 2006 and 2013 in each category both witnessed the
comparable percentage.
With resident taking fast food restaurants as must – go destinations once
a week or one/ 2 times a month, about 30% people in the first year. For
the next years, the percentages changed to different conditions while the
proportion of fast – food restaurant serving weekly customers experienced
a upward trend in 2006 (33%) followed by a gradual decrease in 2013
(28%), the figures for monthly clients were variate with the opposite to
the overall trend of weekly clients in each year but with the same gap
fluctuation.
For people choosing to go to fast – food restaurant several times a week,
the first year’s rate stood at 17% followed by 20% (2006) and 16 (2003).
In terms of categories with comparable trends, with daily customers and
eaters who hadn’t be served in fast food restaurants all ranged below 5%
with the same amount of decrease in each year. Turning to people didn’t
consider eating fast food as their usual habit, the proportion represented a
slightly higher number with 13% in 2003 and 15% in both 2006 and 2013.

SAMPLE:
Looking first of all at the most pervasive habits, in 2003, 31% of individual
ate fast food once a week compared to 30% eating it once or twice a
month. From there, these trends diverged with those eating once a week
rising to 34% in 2006 and then falling precipitously to 27% by 2013.
Eating once or twice a month fell to 25% and then surged to 34% in the
final year.

The figure for those eating fast food several times a week stood at 17% in
2003, rose to 20% in 2006 and dipped to a low of 15% in 2013. In
contrast, in 2003, 13% of individuals consumed fast food a few times a
year and this number stabilized at 15% for the final two years recorded.
The numbers for every day and never were nearly identical with the
former at 4% in 2003 and then 3% and the latter starting at 5% and
reaching a low of 4% in both 2006 and 2013.
The charts below give information about the price of tickets on one airline
between Sydney and Melbourne, Australia, over a two-week period in
2013.

The bar charts illustrate changes in the flying cost of two – way journey
from Sydney and Melbourne over two weeks in 2013. From an overall
perspective, while it is readily apparent that the prices of all days
remained relatively stable, the charges of for airline tickets flying from
Melbourne and Sydney decreased to varying degrees, with the most
significant changes occurring in on Monday and the weekend.
In terms of fees from Sydney to Melbourne, in the first week, the price of
Monday represented a high of 80 dollars and fell dramatically to 50 dollars
in the next week. The weekends recorded slightly lower numbers with
Friday (75 dollars) followed by Saturday and Sunday at 70 and 50 dollars
respectively. Those figures remained unchanged until the second week.
The weekdays from Tuesday to Thursday with costs ranging below 40
dollars and stabilizing with the same figures in week two.
Regarding the prices of tickets from Melbourne to Sydney, the highest fee
was allocated to Friday at 80 dollars, the second highest belonged to
Monday and Saturday at 60 dollars. The next week saw a decline of 20
dollars on Monday and Friday as opposed to 10 dollars on Saturday, to be
equivalent with Sunday, which remained unaltered during a two-week
period. The price of airline tickets from Tuesday to Thursday took up a
comparable amount of 35 dollars throughout the two weeks.

SAMPLE:
The bar charts display information for the price of airline tickets from
Sydney to Melbourne and the reverse flight over a two week period in
2013. Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that
flights in both directions displayed broadly similar patterns with higher
prices Friday through Monday. Compared to week 1, week 2 prices were
either greatly deflated or identical for nearly all flights.

In week 1, flights from Sydney to Melbourne started at 80$ on Monday,


were all under $40 over the next 3 days before a spike to $75, $70, and
$50 on Friday, Saturday and Sunday, respectively. During the second
week, the prices were unchanged with the notable exception of a decline
on Monday to $50 fares.

In terms of flights from Melbourne to Sydney, the trend was comparable


with flights on Monday of week 1 elevated to $60, sub-$40 flights on
Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday and the most expensive flight on
Friday at $80. Flights on Saturday and Sunday were also relatively costly
at $60 and $50 each day. In week 2, Monday prices displayed a dramatic
decline to $40 and there was more variance later in the week. Friday fell
to $50 and Saturday to $50. All other tickets remained the same in week
2.
The bar chart below shows the popularity of well-known Instagram
accounts in 2011 and 202

The bar chart illustrates changes in the reputation of synonymous


accounts on Instagram between 2018 and 2021. From an overall
perspective, it is readily apparent that those celebrities all grew in
popularity, with the most significant change occurring in Cristiano
Ronaldo. Moreover, Cristiano Ronaldo stood out to be the most popular
figurehead on the Instagram.
Selena Gomez began a period with the highest number of followers
at 125 million, however, the figure grew to nearly 250 million – the lowest
number among all influencers. Starting at as the second most famous
celebrity on social media, Cristiano Ronaldo and Ariana Grande displayed
broadly similar trends with an overall upward trend, ending up at 310 and
250 million followers respectively.
The Rock and Kylie Jenner represented a low of below 100 million
compared to others, however, the two names saw a dramatic increase
with both reaching the same number of 250 million people following.
The bar chart details the follower statistics for 5 popular
personalities on Instagram in 2018 and 2021. Looking from an overall
perspective, it is readily apparent that figures rose for all influencers with
Christiano Ronaldo becoming the most followed and Selena Gomez going
from most to least popular over the period surveyed.

In 2018, Selena Gomez had by far the most followers at 125 million, more
than 10 million above Ariana Grande (112 million) and Ronaldo (110
million). By 2021, Selena’s follower count had nearly doubled to 245
million, while Ronaldo’s surged to lead all celebrities at 315 million and
Ariana Grande increased to 251 million.

The final two influencers, Kylie Jenner and The Rock, experienced similarly
dramatic rising trends. Kylie’s followers were just under 100 million in
2018 and The Rock was slightly lower at around 95 million. Both
influencers added approximately 150 million followers with the former
finishing at 250 million and the latter modestly higher at 252 million.

Ranging took up to follow pattern represent variate a low of


The bar chart illustrates the manufacturing system of coffee in four
nations over a period of twenty years starting from 1990. From an
overall perspective, it is readily evident that while the figures for
Indonesia and Vietnam surged to varying degrees, the opposite was
true for Colombia. Moreover, the most efficient production was
allocated to Brazil during the period given.
In 1990, the number of Brazil’s coffee production was 0,7 million
tones, which 0.1 million tons higher than Colombia. The figures then
represented a sharply higher number in the following years with 1
million tons (1995) followed by a gradual increase of 4 million tons in
every two years. The number of tons in Colombia followed the
periodic decline of 0.1 million tons, ending up at 0.3 million tones
after 20 years.
The manufacturing of Indonesia and Vietnam took up to a low of 0.2
and 0.1 respectively, the latter of both figures stabilized until 1995.
The figures for Indonesia were variate to 0.3 (2000) and 0.4 (2010)
as opposed to Vietnam at 0.2 and 0.3 in turn.

SAMPLE:

In 1990, Brazil narrowly produced the most coffee at .9 million


tonnes. This figure increased steadily and reached 1.9 million tons
by 2010, more than four times higher than the next largest
producer. In contrast, production in Colombia began a period at .6
million tonnes and fell consistently throughout the period to be even
with Vietnam for the lowest total of just over .3 million tonnes by
2010.

Vietnam increased from the smallest exporter at .1 million tonnes in


1990 and 1995 to equal Colombia 20 years later. The final nation,
Indonesia, underwent a steady climb from .2 million tonnes to
double this figure (.4 million) to end the time surveyed.
2 – 3, 6 -7: tang = nhau
0 – 1 8 – 9: stable
4.5: significantly
thì đơn vị
Variate represent at a low of allocated in ranging took up to varying

The bar chart illustrates the frequency of toddlers being surrounded


by their parents. On an overall perspective, it is readily apparent
that while the majority of children generally spend time with either
mother or father during weekdays, they tend to be taken care of by
both parents at the weekend. There are no such pervasive difference
of children with all ages consuming the amount of time with dad &
mom individually, however; children of all ages hang around both
mom & dad with varying degrees.
In terms of spending with dad only, the figures of all ages ranging
below 5 hours during weekdays while half the amount occurring at
the weekend, only children from 5-6 years old sticking around their
dads with the same load of time (1 hour). The amount of time
children hanging out their female parents represented a sharply 3
times lower number as they spend with their mothers for about 6
hours 5 days a week but the figures fall significant to just below 3
hours during weekends.
A rapid surge in time mingling with both parents at the weekend is
at the expense of a substantial decline in the quantity of time with
dad & mom individually. Children are supposed to spend time with
both mothers and fathers for 1 – 2 hours during weekdays, the
weekends witness a dominant surge with all the latter double the
previous number with the biggest amount was allocated in children
at about 2 – 7 (6 hours) trailing behind with 8 – 9 aged group at 5.5
hours and newborn infants with 5 hours.

The bar chart shows the number of visitors to four London museums.

The bar chart illustrates changes in the figures for travelers paying visit to
four museums in London. From an overall perspective, it is readily
apparent that while all the number of paying visit tends to decrease over
time, the only exception is made in British Museum. Moreover, despite
starting at the second highest, British Museum experiences a rapid surge,
surpassing Science Museum by the end of the year.
In terms of history and British Museum, both categories follow a
comparable pattern with the former number at roughly 400,000 visitors in
June and July. From this point on, the figures both rise significantly and
plateau with History (600,000) and British (above 700,000) before a
dramatic decline happen with History ending up at roughly 250,000
visitors in December, which is twofold lower compared to British Museum.
Regarding National Museum and Science Museum, the highest number of
visitors is allocated to Science Museum, which is two times higher than
National one. Both figures fall gradually over the next year. The trends are
diverged with National Museum surging to nearly 400,000 visitors followed
by a sharp dip and finishing at below 200,000 visitors – the same number
from June. Meanwhile, the figure for Science Museum stabilizes until
August with a considerable rise in September and landing at precisely
300,000 afterwards.

The bar chart compares attendance figures for museums in London over a
period from June to December. Looking from an overall perspective, it is
readily apparent that only the British Museum grew in popularity, while
the others saw steep or moderate declines. In terms of overall figures, the
British Museum was highest and the National Museum lowest throughout.

In June, the History Museum (410,000), the British Museum (420,000) and
the Science Museum (430,000) had similar figures with the National
Museum the outlier at just 210,000 visitors. Through July, numbers for all
museums declined gradually, with the exception of the British Museum
which was stable. August saw a shift in the pattern as the History and
British Museum soared to 600,000 and 710,000, respectively. The Science
Museum was unchanged but National Museum admissions doubled to
380,000.

By September, figures had fallen back to 390,000 and 590,000 for the
History and British Museum, in turn, while the Science Museum rose to
500,000 visitors and the National Museum dipped to 200,000. At the end
of the period, the History Museum continued to fall (270,000) along with
the British Museum (470,000), National Museum (190,000), and the
Science Museum (300,000).
The bar chart depicts changes in how many individuals living together in a
house in Britain between 1981 and 2001. From an overall perspective, it is
readily apparent that while below two-person houses grew in popularity,
the opposite was true for the other categories. Moreover, 2-person
households still led the other categories as opposed to 6-person
households ranked last over time.
In 1981, the 2-person households took up a percentage of 31%, which was
nearly double that of the 1-person households. From that point on, both
types of households followed a comparable pattern with an overall upward
trend, as the 1-person households surged significantly to rank second
highest at 26%, and the 2-person households experienced a consistent
increase to 34% in 2001.
Looking at the other categories, 3-person and 4-person households
occupied the figures of 20% and 18% respectively. In addition, the two
kinds of households displayed broadly similar trends with a marginal
decline of 3% with 3-person households dipping to 17% and 15% for 4
person households. 15% of households were 5-person families in 1981,
the data then declined gradually to a low of 6%. Meanwhile, 6-person
households saw a threefold fall from 6% to 2%, and still ranked last over
two decades.

The two stacked bar charts detail the UK’s household demographics in
1981 and 2001. The initial impression from the chart is that 1-person and
2-person households were the second most and the most common family
classifications in both given years, and they also experienced rises in
percentages. The remaining groups made up smaller proportions and
underwent corresponding drops, with the 6-person household being the
least popular one.
In 1981, 2-person household made up 31%, ranking first among the given
household type, after which the rate underwent a mild rise to 34% in
2001. A similar picture is evident in 1-person household, with its figure
accounting for 17% and thereafter rising to 26% in 2001.
Opposite patterns could be observed with regard to the remaining groups.
In 1981 the shares of 3-person, 4-person, 5-person and 6-person were
20%, 18%, 8% and 6% respectively. Over the next 20 years, they all
decreased by similar margins (of around 2-3%) to 17%, 15%, 6% and 2%.

The bar chart illustrates changes in the percentages of total products


generated from two industries, namely IT and the Service Industry in the
England. From an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the two
industries by far had the production grow to varying degrees. Moreover,
the IT industry took up the highest position over time.
The IT Industry began a period at above 6%, which was 1.5 higher
compared to the Service Industry. The percentage of products from the IT
Industry grew significantly to 8% in the next two years, followed by a
small decline of 0.2% in 1996. However, the data was recorded to recover
and plateau at 15% in 2000.
Shifting our focus to the Service Industry, the proportion surged to beyond
6% in 1994. From that point on, manufacturing soared consistently by an
exact amount of 1% every two years, finally ending up at 8%, a twofold
increase from 1992.

The bar chart illustrates the gross domestic products generated from the
IT and Service Industry in the UK from 1992 to 2000. It is measured in
percentages. Overall, it can be seen that both increased as a percentage
of GDP, but IT remained at a higher rate throughout this time.

At the beginning of the period, in 1992, the Service Industry accounted for
4 per cent of GDP, whereas IT exceeded this, at just over 6 per cent. Over
the next four years, the levels became more similar, with both
components standing between 6 and just over 8 per cent. IT was still
higher overall, though it dropped slightly from 1994 to 1996.

However, over the following four years, the patterns of the two
components were noticeably different. The percentage of GDP from IT
increased quite sharply to 12 in 1998 and then nearly 15 in 2000, while
the Service Industry stayed nearly the same, increasing to only 8 per cent.
At the end of the period, the percentage of GDP from IT was almost twice
that of the Service Industry.

The chart illustrates changes in the age demographics of Australian


females becoming first time parent from 1966 to 2006. From an
overall perspective, it is readily apparent that women had a
tendency to become mothers at older ages. Moreover, the age group
of 19 – 24 resigned the highest position to the 30 – 34 age group,
while the age category of over 40 recorded no changes over time.
In 1966, 32% of women were under 19 compared to above 60%
were in their early adulthood gave birth to their first child. The two
age groups both displayed similar trends with a decline of 12% in
young mothers and 24% in women between 19 and 24. Both groups
declined gradually with under 19 mothers ending up at 11% and 19-
24 mothers finishing at 28%.
Shifting our focus to the other categories, the data ranged from a
low of 3% in middle-aged mothers to a high of 38% in 25 – 30-year-
olds mother, with 30-34 (roughly 12%) and 34-39 (8%) in between.
From this point, the age group of 25 – 39 mothers saw a dramatic
decline in 1986. However, the trends diverged with a considerable
decrease in 34 – 39 age group, in contrast, the figure for 30-34 aged
mothers surged significantly to plateau at 45%, nearly a fivefold
increase from 1966, outracing the remaining categories. Meanwhile,
the age group of 34-39 also saw a dramatic soar, landing at 30%,
while the statistics for middle-aged mothers remained relatively
stable.
In 1966, 33% of women had their first child under the age of 19. This
figure dropped precipitously to reach 11% by 2006. The data for
women 19-24 underwent a similar drop, falling from 62% to 50%
and finally 28%.

In contrast, 36% of women were 19-24 years old when they first
gave birth in 1966 and this number then rose to 50% in 1986 before
dropping back to just above the original figure to end the period. The
largest rise occurred in the 30-34 age range which more than
quadrupled (11% to 18% to 45%). This paralleled the growth for
ages 34-39, nearly doubling every 20 years from 9% to 17% and
lastly 30%. Finally, there was little change for women over 40
despite marginal growth from 3% to 5%.

You might also like