Scribd
Upload
11 views

Ranking Community WS Schemes

The document outlines evaluation criteria for prioritizing water supply and sewerage schemes based on various factors such as hardship, existing water quality, poverty level, and community participation. Each criterion has a specific scoring system, with a total possible score of 100. The selection of schemes for implementation will be merit-based, focusing on the highest scores achieved by the candidates.

Uploaded by

pratapkc235
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
11 views

Ranking Community WS Schemes

The document outlines evaluation criteria for prioritizing water supply and sewerage schemes based on various factors such as hardship, existing water quality, poverty level, and community participation. Each criterion has a specific scoring system, with a total possible score of 100. The selection of schemes for implementation will be merit-based, focusing on the highest scores achieved by the candidates.

Uploaded by

pratapkc235
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Annex:

Department of Water Supply and Sewerage


Evaluation Criteria for Prioritizing Schemes
Name of Scheme:
Region: District: Municipality/VDC: Ward No:

Following evaluation shall be adopted for prioritizing candidate schemes for implementation.Selection of
schemes for implementation shall be on merit basis

Score
Full Score
S.No. Description secured Remarks
1 Hardship 20
1.1 Travelling time 10 10
<= 10 minutes 0
10 to 30 minutes 0 to 3
30 to 60 minutes 3 to 6
> 60 minutes 10
1.2 Waiting time in sources 6 6
<= 10 minutes 0
10 to 30 minutes 0 to 2
30 to 60 minutes 2 to 4
> 60 minutes 6

1.3 Per Capita Water Consumption, lpcd 4 4


>30 1
30 to 20 2
20 to 10 3
< 10 4

2 Existing Water Quality 15 15


Protected Springs/ Tubewell 0
Spring/ Protected Well with Hand Pump 5
Stream/ Dug Well 10
Kuwa/ Pond/ Canal/River 15

3 Poverty Level 10 10
Percentage of population below poverty line
>= 80 10
80 to 60 7
60 to 40 4
40 to 20 2
< 20 0

4 Percentage of Socially Deprieved People 5 5


>= 80 5
80 to 60 4
60 to 40 3
40 to 20 2
< 20 0

5 Remoteness 10 10
Distance, Km from nearest Road/Airport/ District HQs
> 50 10
50 to 30 6
30 to 10 2
< 10 0
Annex:
Department of Water Supply and Sewerage
Evaluation Criteria for Prioritizing Schemes
Name of Scheme:
Region: District: Municipality/VDC: Ward No:

Following evaluation shall be adopted for prioritizing candidate schemes for implementation.Selection of
schemes for implementation shall be on merit basis

Score
Full Score
S.No. Description secured Remarks
6 Existing Latrine Coverage Percentage 5 5
>= 60 0
60 to 40 2
40 to 20 3
20 to 10 4
< 10 5

7 Per Capita Cost, Rs. 10 10


< 1500 10
1500 to 5000 6
> 5000 2

8 Community Contribution in % of Capital Cost 10 10


>= 25 10
25 to 20 8
20 to 15 5
15 to 10 2
< 10 0

9 Community Willingness and Participation


9.1 Project demand by 3 3
Community Decision 3
Other 0
9.2 Community participation in scheme preparation activities 2 2
Active 2
Passive 0

10 Status of gender balance in community institutions 5 5


Male to female ratio 1 : 1 and above 1
Male to female ratio 2 : 1 to 1 :1 2
Male to female ratio 5 : 1 to 2 : 1 3
Male to female ratio 10 : 1 to 5 : 1 4
Male to female ratio 10 : 1 to 0 5

11 Cost Recovery in percentage 5 5


up to 30 5
30 to 20 4
20 to 10 3
10 to 5 2
5 to 1 1
0 0
100
Note: Total score = Sum of the scores of S.No 1 to 11

You might also like