Scribd
Upload
4 views

files2.edu-nation.net (18)

The Year 9 Physics Project focuses on innovative energy sources and is graded out of 50 marks based on six criteria: research question and hypothesis, experimental setup design and procedure, data collection and presentation, conclusion and analysis, references and research quality, and real-world applications and sustainability links. Each criterion is assessed on a scale from 'Excellent' to 'Needs Improvement' with specific descriptions for each level. The grading scale categorizes overall performance into five tiers, from 'Outstanding' to 'Needs Improvement'.

Uploaded by

PMuhammadHamza Hayat
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
4 views

files2.edu-nation.net (18)

The Year 9 Physics Project focuses on innovative energy sources and is graded out of 50 marks based on six criteria: research question and hypothesis, experimental setup design and procedure, data collection and presentation, conclusion and analysis, references and research quality, and real-world applications and sustainability links. Each criterion is assessed on a scale from 'Excellent' to 'Needs Improvement' with specific descriptions for each level. The grading scale categorizes overall performance into five tiers, from 'Outstanding' to 'Needs Improvement'.

Uploaded by

PMuhammadHamza Hayat
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Year 9 Physics Project

Rubrics
Project Title: Innovative Energy Sources: The Future of Power Generation
Total Marks: 50
Criteria Excellent Good Satisfactory Needs Marks
(5 marks) (4 marks) (3 marks) Improvement Awarded
(0-2 marks)
1. Research Clearly stated Research Research Research
Question & research question and question is question and
Hypothesis question and hypothesis present but hypothesis /5
hypothesis. are clear but lacks clarity. are missing or
Well- could be more Hypothesis is unclear.
formulated specific. weak.
and logical.
2. Well-planned Good Experimental Experimental
Experimental setup, clear experimental setup lacks setup and
Setup Design diagram, and design with clarity. materials are
& detailed list of clear Materials list unclear or /5
Procedure materials. materials list. is missing.
Setup is Minor incomplete.
innovative improvements
and practical. needed.
3. Data Data is Data is mostly Data is No data
Collection & accurately accurate and incomplete or collection or
Presentation collected and well- lacks proper poorly /5
presented in presented but labeling in presented
well-labeled lacks clarity in tables and information.
tables and some parts. graphs.
graphs.
4. Conclusion Conclusion is Conclusion is Conclusion is No clear
& Analysis logical, well- valid but weak and conclusion or
explained, could be more lacks proper inaccurate /5
and backed detailed in analysis of interpretation
by data. connecting to results. of results.
Efficiency data.
comparison
is clear.
5. References Well-cited Sources cited Few sources No references
& Research sources but some cited; lacks or unreliable
Quality (books, formatting credibility. sources. /5
articles, issues.
websites).
Proper
formatting
used.
6. Real-World Excellent Good real- Some No clear
Applications connection to world connection to connection to
& SDG/UAE real-world connections, real-world real-world /5
Link applications minor applications applications
and UAE improvements but lacks or SDGs.
sustainability needed. depth.
goals.

Grading Scale:

27-30 – Outstanding
24-26 – Excellent
21-23 – Good
18-20 – Satisfactory
Below 20 – Needs Improvement

You might also like