0% found this document useful (0 votes)
45 views

Projects Bgp At Doors of Autonomous Systems is Simple Edit (1)

The document outlines the evaluation process for a project on BGP at the doors of autonomous systems, emphasizing the importance of respectful and constructive feedback. Evaluators are instructed to assess the students' work based on specific guidelines, ensuring that all required components are present and functioning correctly. The evaluation includes both theoretical and practical assessments, with clear criteria for grading and reporting any issues encountered.

Uploaded by

moumounib37
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
45 views

Projects Bgp At Doors of Autonomous Systems is Simple Edit (1)

The document outlines the evaluation process for a project on BGP at the doors of autonomous systems, emphasizing the importance of respectful and constructive feedback. Evaluators are instructed to assess the students' work based on specific guidelines, ensuring that all required components are present and functioning correctly. The evaluation includes both theoretical and practical assessments, with clear criteria for grading and reporting any issues encountered.

Uploaded by

moumounib37
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Intra Projects Bgp At Doors of Autonomous Systems is Sim... https://projects.intra.42.

fr/scale_teams/7060915/edit

42 (https://
profile.intra.   (https://profile.intra.42.fr/ moboustt
42.fr)

searches)

SCALE FOR PROJECT BGP AT DOORS OF


AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS IS SIMPLE (/
PROJECTS/BGP-AT-DOORS-OF-
AUTONOMOUS-SYSTEMS-IS-SIMPLE)
You should evaluate 2 students in this team

Git repository


[email protected]:vogsphere/intra-uuid-2c8a65fd-63f9-4422-b36

Introduction
Please comply with the following rules:

- Remain polite, courteous, respectful and constructive throughout the


evaluation process. The well-being of the community depends on it.

- Identify with the student or group whose work is evaluated the possible
dysfunctions in their project. Take the time to discuss and debate the
problems that may have been identified.

- You must consider that there might be some differences in how your peers
might have understood the project's instructions and the scope of its
functionalities. Always keep an open mind and grade them as honestly as
possible. The pedagogy is useful only and only if the peer-evaluation is
done seriously.

Guidelines
- Only grade the work that was turned in the Git repository of the evaluated
student or group.

- Double-check that the Git repository belongs to the student(s). Ensure that
the project is the one expected. Also, check that 'git clone' is used in an
empty folder.

- Check carefully that no malicious aliases was used to fool you and make you
evaluate something that is not the content of the official repository.

1 of 5 8/12/24, 00:44
Intra Projects Bgp At Doors of Autonomous Systems is Sim... https://projects.intra.42.fr/scale_teams/7060915/edit

- To avoid any surprises and if applicable, review together any scripts used
to facilitate the grading (scripts for testing or automation).

- If you have not completed the assignment you are going to evaluate, you have
to read the entire subject prior to starting the evaluation process.

- Use the available flags to report an empty repository, a non-functioning


program, a Norm error, cheating, and so forth.
In these cases, the evaluation process ends and the final grade is 0,
or -42 in case of cheating. However, except for cheating, student are
strongly encouraged to review together the work that was turned in, in order
to identify any mistakes that shouldn't be repeated in the future.

Attachments
 subject.pdf (https://cdn.intra.42.fr/pdf/pdf/116843/en.subject.pdf)

Preliminaries
If cheating is suspected, the evaluation stops here. Use the "Cheat" flag to report it. Take this
decision calmly, wisely, and please, use this button with caution.

Preliminary tests

• Defense can only happen if the evaluated student or group is present. This way
everybody learns by sharing knowledge with each other.
• If no work has been submitted (or wrong files, wrong directory, or wrong filenames), the
grade is 0, and the evaluation process ends.
• For this project, you have to clone their Git repository on their station.

 Yes  No

Consignes générales
General guidelines

• During the defense, whenever you need help to verify a point, someone from the group
being evaluated should be able to help you..
• Check that all the files needed to configure the application are stored in the folders P1,
P2 and P3. These folders must be located in the root of the repository.
• Run GNS3 now.

 Yes  No

2 of 5 8/12/24, 00:44
Intra Projects Bgp At Doors of Autonomous Systems is Sim... https://projects.intra.42.fr/scale_teams/7060915/edit

Mandatory part
The project consists in setting up several infrastructures with different constraints. Make sure
that all of the following points are met.

Project overview

• A person from the group being evaluated should explain simply:


◦ The basic functioning of GNS3.
◦ The global operation and the interest of BGP.
◦ The differences between layer 2 and layer 3 in a network.

 Yes  No

Part 1 - Theory

• A person from the group being evaluated should explain simply:


◦ What is a packet routing software.
◦ What is the BGPD service requested in the subject.
◦ What is the OSPFD service requested in the topic.
◦ What is the routing engine service requested in the topic.
◦ What is Busybox asked in the subject. If something does not work as expected,
the evaluation stops here.

 Yes  No

Part 1 - Practice

• A person from the group being evaluated should simply show you with explanations:
◦ How to set up the docker images requested in the topic. A small explanation of
each image is expected.
◦ How to import docker images into GNS3.
◦ How to activate these imported machines in GNS3.
◦ How to access these machines in GNS3.
◦ Show that the services requested by the subject are active in these active
machines. If something does not work as expected, the evaluation stops here.

 Yes  No

Part 2 - Theory

• A person from the group being evaluated should explain simply:


◦ What is a VXLAN and the differences with a VLAN.
◦ What is a switch encountered in the subject.
◦ What is a bridge encountered in the subject.
◦ The differences between broadcast and multicast.
◦ The expected operation of the topology indicated in the subject. If something
does not work as expected, the evaluation stops here.

3 of 5 8/12/24, 00:44
Intra Projects Bgp At Doors of Autonomous Systems is Sim... https://projects.intra.42.fr/scale_teams/7060915/edit

 Yes  No

Part 2 - Practice - static

• A person from the group being evaluated should simply show you with explanations:
◦ The configuration files to set up this part.
◦ How to import project 2 into GNS3.
◦ How to run these imported machines in GNS3.
◦ How to configure all the machines planned in the topology of the subject.
◦ Everything must work properly. A simple ping must be used as indicated in the
subject. A packet inspection is mandatory. A return close to the example given in
the subject is expected here.
◦ The VXLAN ID must be set to 10. If something does not work as expected, the
evaluation stops here.

 Yes  No

Part 2 - Practice - group

• A person from the group being evaluated should simply show you with explanations:
◦ The configuration files to set up this part.
◦ How to configure all the machines planned in the topology of the subject..
◦ Everything must work properly. A simple ping must be used as indicated in the
subject. A packet inspection is mandatory. A return close to the example given in
the subject is expected here.
◦ The VXLAN ID must be set to 10.
◦ The differences between this second subpart and the one required before. What
are the advantages? If something does not work as expected, the evaluation
stops here.

 Yes  No

Part 3 - Theory

• A person from the group being evaluated should explain simply:


◦ What is BGP-EVPN requested in the subject.
◦ The principle of road reflection requested in the subject.
◦ What VTEP means as seen in the subject.
◦ What VNI means as seen in the subject.
◦ The difference between type 2 and type 3 roads seen in the subject.
◦ The expected operation of the topology indicated in the subject. If something
does not work as expected, the evaluation stops here.

 Yes  No

Part 3 - Practice

• A person from the group being evaluated should simply show you with explanations:

4 of 5 8/12/24, 00:44
Intra Projects Bgp At Doors of Autonomous Systems is Sim... https://projects.intra.42.fr/scale_teams/7060915/edit

◦ The configuration files to set up this part.


◦ How to import project 3 into GNS3.
◦ How to run these imported machines in GNS3.
◦ How to configure all the machines in the subject topology.
◦ How to disable all HOST machines in GNS3.
◦ No type 2 roads should exist. Only type 3 roads should be shown.
◦ The learning process is well done on the VTEPs. We will have to start up a single
host machine and verify that it is well recognized by our VTEPs. No IP address
must be configured on this freshly activated host. A type 2 route must be visible
when this host is activated.
◦ Now enable all host machines and configure IP addresses on each.
◦ Everything must work properly. A simple ping must be used as indicated in the
subject. A packet inspection is mandatory. A return close to the example given in
the subject is expected here.
◦ The VXLAN ID must be set to 10.
◦ Packets using the OSPF protocol are visible. If something does not work as
expected, the evaluation stops here.

 Yes  No

Ratings
Don’t forget to check the flag corresponding to the defense

 Ok  Outstanding project

Empty work  Incomplete work  Cheat d Crash  Concerning situation

Conclusion
Leave a comment on this evaluation

Finish evaluation

Declaration on Privacy General term Rules of Terms of use for Legal


the use of policy of use of the procedure video notices
cookies (https:// (https:// site (https:// (https:// surveillance (https://
profile.intra. profile.intra. profile.intra. profile.intra. (https:// profile.intra.
42.fr/legal/ 42.fr/legal/ 42.fr/legal/ 42.fr/legal/ profile.intra. 42.fr/legal/
terms/2) terms/5) terms/6) terms/4) 42.fr/legal/ terms/3)
terms/1)

5 of 5 8/12/24, 00:44

You might also like