1 Reference Frames
1 Reference Frames
home next
Inertial Frames
The Galilean Transformations
Inertial Frames
The cornerstone of the theory of special relativity is the Principle of Relativity:
The Laws of Physics are the same in all inertial frames of reference.
We shall see that many surprising consequences follow from this innocuous looking statement.
Let us first, however, briefly review Newton’s mechanics in terms of frames of reference.
A “frame of reference” is just a set of coordinates: something you use to measure the things that
matter in Newtonian problems, that is to say, positions and velocities, so we also need a clock.
A point in space is specified by its three coordinates (x, y, z) and an “event” like, say, a little
explosion, by a place and time: (x, y, z, t) .
An inertial frame is defined as one in which Newton’s law of inertia holds—that is, any body which
isn’t being acted on by an outside force stays at rest if it is initially at rest, or continues to move at a
galileo.phys.virginia.edu/classes/252/lecture1.htm 1/4
22/3/25, 13:14 Reference Frames
constant velocity if that’s what it was doing to begin with. An example of a non-inertial frame is a
rotating frame, such as a carousel.
The “laws of physics” we shall consider first are those of Newtonian mechanics, as expressed by
Newton’s Laws of Motion, with gravitational forces and also contact forces from objects pushing
against each other. For example, knowing the universal gravitational constant from experiment
(and the masses involved), it is possible from Newton’s Second Law,
Suppose we know from experiment that these laws of mechanics are true in one frame of
reference. How do they look in another frame, moving with respect to the first frame? To find out,
we have to figure out how to get from position, velocity and acceleration in one frame to the
corresponding quantities in the second frame.
Obviously, the two frames must have a constant relative velocity, otherwise the law of inertia won’t
hold in both of them. Let’s choose the coordinates so that this velocity is along the x -axis of both
of them.
Suppose S′ is proceeding relative to S at speed v along the x -axis. For convenience, let us label
the moment when O′ passes O as the zero point of timekeeping.
galileo.phys.virginia.edu/classes/252/lecture1.htm 2/4
22/3/25, 13:14 Reference Frames
If an event happens at (x, y, z, t) as measured in S, what are its coordinates (x′ , y ′ , z ′ , t′ ) in S′?
It’s easy to see t′ = t —we synchronized the clocks when O′ passed O. Also, evidently,
y = y and z = z, from the figure. We can also see that x = x + vt. Thus (x, y, z, t) in S
′ ′ ′
′
x = x − vt ,
′
y = y,
′
z = z,
′
t = t.
That’s how positions transform; these are known as the Galilean transformations.
′ ′
dx dx d dx
′
u x = = = ( x − vt ) = − v = u x − v.
′
dt dt dt dt
′
ux = u x + v.
′ ′
du x du x d du x
= = ( u x − v) =
′
dt dt dt dt
since v is constant.
That is to say,
′
a x = ax ,
the acceleration is the same in both frames. This again is obvious—the acceleration is the rate of
change of velocity, and the velocities of the same particle measured in the two frames differ by a
constant factor-the relative velocity of the two frames.
→ Gm m ˆ
1 2 →
m1 a = r
2
r
we get the same law on going to another inertial frame because every term in the above equation
stays the same.
→
Note that m a is the rate of change of momentum—this is the same in both frames. So, in a
collision, say, if total momentum is conserved in one frame (the sum of individual rates of change of
galileo.phys.virginia.edu/classes/252/lecture1.htm 3/4
22/3/25, 13:14 Reference Frames
home next
galileo.phys.virginia.edu/classes/252/lecture1.htm 4/4