Minimum Practical Questionnaire
Minimum Practical Questionnaire
1. Describe about yourself (schooling, professional examination status, article-ship experience etc.)
2. Describe your strengths and weaknesses.
Strengths:
Quick learner
Adaptable
Self-Motivated
Professionally congenial
Hardworking
Weaknesses:
Nervous incase of fault on my part
I lose trust on myself sometimes
Forget things until and unless checked couple of times
A bit emotional
My family and close friends
7. How are your client management skills. How will you be able to manage the audits without team?
I have already done it on the client I finalized. I was given 2 junior and assigned him little work and
did close supervision as if I were alone there.
11. What work you have performed when you are carrying out interim reviews / hard closing?
Work on P&L heads on sample basis to mitigate pressure over meeting client deadline after year
end.
Audit Planning
13. What we will do for the clients where engagement risk is assessed as greater than normal? Will it
impact our audit procedure? Should we perform any special procedures?
15. Why the auditor obtains the Understanding of the entity and its environment including its relevant
controls?
- Identify and assess risk — Our awareness of and ability to respond to risks are considerably
enhanced by our understanding of the Entity and its environment.
Inherent risk
Control risk
Detection risk
The risk that the financial statements are materially misstated prior to audit. It has 2 components
Inherent risk and control risk.
21. How will you calculate materiality and in which document (form #)?
When there is variation in profits, first we eliminate the unusual items from the profit and then we
use adjusted profit for the computation of materiality. If there is no unusual item we will normalize
the profit i.e. we will take the average profit of 3 years.
Performance materiality is set to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that the
aggregate of uncorrected and undetected misstatements in the financial statements exceeds
materiality for the financial statements as a whole.
Normally it should be LY misstatement reported in schedule of misstatement w/p or 10% of
materiality whichever is higher. It depends on the professional judgment of the Partner. However, on
listed clients including insurance and banking clients we normally take PM 75% of materiality.
24. If you have observed variation in one account head, though the balance is immaterial, will you
consider it for further audit procedures according to new audit approach?
We can select the account balance as material on quantitative basis as there might be some
misstatement in account balance or some control weakness has been identified last year.
25. What reasons could constitute an account head as qualitatively material, though it is
quantitatively immaterial?
27. Difference between risk and significant risk. How do we identify a significant risk?
If the auditor has determined that an assessed risk of material misstatement at the assertion level is
a significant risk, first identify relevant control to mitigate that risk and perform D&I and the result of
D&I is effective and no control reliance strategy adopted, then the auditor shall perform substantive
procedures that are specifically responsive to that risk. When the approach to a significant risk
consists only of substantive procedures, those procedures shall include tests of details.
If control reliance strategy adopted, then first perform Test of controls and then the auditor shall
perform substantive procedures that are specifically responsive to that risk.
Auditor should perform substantive procedures that are specifically responsive to risks the auditor
has determined to be significant risks. Audit evidence in the form of external confirmations received
directly by the auditor from appropriate confirming parties may assist the auditor in obtaining audit
evidence with the high level of reliability that the auditor requires to respond to significant risks of
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. For example, if the auditor identifies that
management is under pressure to meet earnings expectations, there may be a risk that management
is inflating sales by improperly recognizing revenue related to sales agreements with terms that
preclude revenue recognition or by invoicing sales before shipment. In these circumstances, the
auditor may, for example, design external confirmation procedures not only to confirm outstanding
amounts, but also to confirm the details of the sales agreements, including date, any rights of return
and delivery terms. In addition, the auditor may find it effective to supplement such external
confirmation procedures with inquiries of non-financial personnel in the entity regarding any
changes in sales agreements and delivery terms.
There are two presumed risks which we keep while doing planning:
Disclosure Assertions
31. What is cut-off assertion and what procedures are performed to check this assertion
Transactions and events have been recorded in the correct accounting period.
To verify the cut off assertion we normally select last 5 transactions at year end and 5 transactions
subsequent to the year end and verify that whether these are recorded in correct period. However,
depending upon the cut-off controls at the client we may select more transactions e.g. 10 or 15
transactions before and after year end.
For understatement we select the samples from the source documents and trace them back to the
general ledger.
33. Why we perform preliminary analytical review? Why we repeat it again at the end of audit in
financial statement review? What is difference between the two reviews and what are the form
numbers in which we document these?
Preliminary analytical procedure at planning stage is a high level review and provide base for
identifying risks. Our procedures are performed with a number of objectives in mind. These are to:
· Identify indications of risks (i.e., unusual or unexpected balances and relationships in the financial
statements that may indicate a specific risk of material misstatement)
· Understand the client’s business, including any significant operational or accounting changes
that may have occurred since the prior audit engagement
· As a whole, the financial statements are consistent with our knowledge of the business, our
understanding of individual account balances and relationships, and our audit evidence
· The accounting policies used in preparing the financial statements are appropriate and properly
disclosed, as are any changes in the policies
· The balances and associated disclosures in the financial statements are presented in
accordance with the accounting policies, professional standards, and legislative and regulatory
requirements of the financial reporting framework.
Audit procedures
35. How do you verify accounts receivable, along with its alternative procedure, if it is not possible to
obtain client confirmation then what would be the audit implication?
- Obtain the list of debtors from client and select the balances for confirmation on sampling basis.
- If confirmation not received then check subsequent movement in the balances. Further, if
confirmation not received then performs Test of invoices. If not possible then we may report the
matter in ASM or modified the report depend on the materiality. – Negative confirmation (ask the
client to respond if they find a discrepancy between their and client records) – Positive
confirmation (To respond in any case)
36. What action will you take if you third party confirmation is received through client?
Not acceptable as these has to be confirmed by the third party directly to our office.
37. How do you verify inventory and obsolete stock?
Check the subsequent invoices or latest available invoice of relevant samples sold after the year end.
39. What is difference between weighted average and moving average inventory system?
- The AVCO is used in Periodic system i.e. inventory is valued at period end.
- However, Moving average is used in perpetual system i.e. at each purchase, the rate is computed.
40. What alternate procedures will you perform, if physical inventory count was not done on cutoff
date?
Perform stock count at date after the year end and check the movement of stock from the year end
date to the date of stock count by verifying the purchases and sales during the period.
41. What procedures will you perform in order to address the risk of management override of
controls?
- Test the appropriateness of journal entries recorded in the general ledger and other adjustments in
the preparation of the financial statements. In designing and performing audit procedures for such
Tests, we:
- Make inquiries of individuals involved in the financial reporting process about inappropriate or
unusual activity relating to the processing of journal entries and other adjustments
- Select journal entries and other adjustments made at the end of a reporting period
- Consider the need to Test journal entries and other adjustments throughout the period.
- Review accounting estimates for management bias and evaluate whether the circumstances
producing the bias, if any, represent a Risk of Material Misstatement due to Fraud. In performing this
review, we:
Evaluate whether the judgments and decisions made by Management in making the
Accounting Estimates included in the Financial Statements indicate a possible bias on the
part of the Entity's Management;
Perform a retrospective review of Management judgments and assumptions related to
significant Accounting Estimates reflected in the Financial Statements of the prior year
42. What procedures you will perform, if you identify any fraudulent activity at client?
Immediately inform to your senior / manager / partner about the fraudulent activity so that he can
take appropriate action. The procedures performed to address the risk would depend on the nature
of the fraud and the related account balance affected.
44. What procedure will you perform for bank reconciling items?
In order to determine whether internal controls are designed, implemented and operating
effectively and determine the extent of substantive procedures to be performed.
The auditor shall design and perform tests of controls to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence
as to the operating effectiveness of relevant controls if; The auditor’s assessment of risks of material
misstatement at the assertion level includes an expectation that the controls are operating
effectively (that is, the auditor intends to rely on the operating effectiveness of controls in
determining the nature, timing and extent of substantive procedures); or
Normally we don’t have control reliance strategy for owner managed companies. We rely on
substantive procedures including both test of details and substantive analytical procedures.
- No. For normal risk, if there is no change in internal controls and we have performed test of
controls in the preceding year, we may not perform tests of controls during the current audit.
Controls in this case could be review once in three years.
- Where the substantive procedures alone don’t provide the sufficient appropriate audit evidence
b. What is the audit procedure if any deficiency is found during control testing?
Where one deficiency is identified we will increase our samples size, if no further deficiencies are
identified then we should rely on controls otherwise we should not.
If, as a result of the procedures performed as required by paragraphs 6 and 7, the auditor
identifies events that require adjustment of, or disclosure in, the financial statements, the auditor
shall determine whether each such event is appropriately reflected in those financial statements
in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework.
Facts Which Become Known to the Auditor after the Date of the
Auditor’s Report but before the Date the Financial Statements
Are Issued
The auditor has no obligation to perform any audit procedures regarding the financial
statements after the date of the auditor’s report. However, if, after the date of the
auditor’s report but before the date the financial statements are issued, a fact becomes
known to the auditor that, had it been known to the auditor at the date of the auditor’s
report, may have caused the auditor to amend the auditor’s report, the auditor shall:
(Ref: Para. A11-A12)
a. Discuss the matter with management and, where appropriate, those charged with
governance;
b. Determine whether the financial statements need amendment and, if so,
c. Inquire how management intends to address the matter in the financial
statements.
11.
If management amends the financial statements, the auditor shall:
a. Carry out the audit procedures necessary in the circumstances on the
amendment.
b. Unless the circumstances in paragraph 12 apply:
i. Extend the audit procedures referred to in paragraphs 6 and 7 to the date of
the new auditor’s report; and
ii. Provide a new auditor’s report on the amended financial
statements. The new auditor’s report shall not be dated earlier
than the date of approval of the amended financial statements.
15.
If management amends the financial statements, the auditor shall: (Ref: Para. A19)
a. Carry out the audit procedures necessary in the circumstances on the
amendment.
b. Review the steps taken by management to ensure that anyone in receipt of
the previously issued financial statements together with the auditor’s report
thereon is informed of the situation.
c. Unless the circumstances in paragraph 12 apply:
i. Extend the audit procedures referred to in paragraphs 6 and 7 to the date of
the new auditor’s report, and date the new auditor’s report no earlier than the
date of approval of the amended financial statements; and
ii. Provide a new auditor’s report on the amended financial
statements.
d. When the circumstances in paragraph 12 apply, amend the
auditor’s report, or provide a new auditor’s report as required by
paragraph 12.
16.
The auditor shall include in the new or amended auditor’s report an Emphasis of Matter
paragraph or Other Matter paragraph referring to a note to the financial statements that
more extensively discusses the reason for the amendment of the previously issued
financial statements and to the earlier report provided by the auditor.
17.
If management does not take the necessary steps to ensure that anyone in receipt of
the previously issued financial statements is informed of the situation and does not
amend the financial statements in circumstances where the auditor believes they need
to be amended, the auditor shall notify management and, unless all of those charged
with governance are involved in managing the entity,7 those charged with governance,
that the auditor will seek to prevent future reliance on the auditor’s report. If, despite
such notification, management or those charged with governance do not take these
necessary steps, the auditor shall take appropriate action to seek to prevent reliance on
the auditor’s report. (Ref: Para. A20)
Key audit matters—Those matters that, in the auditor’s professional judgment, were of most
significance in the audit of the financial statements of the current period. Key audit matters are
selected from matters communicated with those charged with governance.
Accounting Treatment
g. What are the changes in IAS 19 and whether these changes applied retrospectively?
IAS 19 (revised) is applicable from accounting period beginning on or after January 01, 2013.
Following are some significant changes in IAS 19 Revised:
1. actuarial gains and losses are routed to OCI;
2. Amounts recorded in the profit and loss account are limited to current and past service costs,
gains or losses on settlements, and net interest income (expense);
3. All other changes in the net defined benefit obligation are recognized directly in other
comprehensive income with no subsequent recycling to the profit and loss account
Changes in IAS 19 are applied retrospectively as change in accounting policy. All the provision of IAS
08 relating to Change in accounting policy are applicable.
Detail knowledge of IASs is required (mainly IAS 11, IAS 18, IAS 40, IAS 37 and IFRS 5).
i. What are the categories of investment under IAS 39 and what are there different treatments?
- FV through profit or loss – Carried at fair value with changes in FV recognized in P/L
- AFS – Carried at fair value with changes in FV recognized in OCI. However, impairment is charged to
P&L.
- HTM – Amortized cost
- Loans and receivables – Amortized cost
The trainees are advised to read provisions of impairment mentioned in IAS 39 and how to compute
amortized cost (or what is the difference between cost and amortized cost)
The main difference is that the IFRS 9 has only 2 categories for investment which are
Reporting
k. What issues will you include in Management Letter and Cover Letter?
- Control weaknesses are normally reported to ML.
- Significant issues requiring attention of BOD are reported in CL.
- If ML is not issued then all the above matters can be reported in CL.
l. If you identify material misstatements, what actions will you take in this respect?
Ask the management to adjust / correct it. If the management disagrees then immediately report it
to supervisor / manager so that the impact of such misstatement on the financial statement can be
assessed. If the impact of audit adjustments is material then modified opinion would be issued.
However all corrected and uncorrected misstatements (above CTM) are reported in schedule of
misstatement w/p.
Further, all unrecorded misstatements are stated in representation letter by the management.
Trainees should have sufficient knowledge of ISA relating to modifications of audit report.
n. If uncorrected misstatement exceeds MP then what is the procedure? Do we report in ASM or put
qualification in Audit report?
First report the matter in audit summary memorandum, then it is be included in the ML and / or
audit report to be decided by the engagement partner based on materiality and severity of
misstatement.
Construction related:
IPE can be system generated report i.e. computer generated information (CGI) and could be manual.
When using information produced by the Entity we shall evaluate whether the information is sufficiently
reliable for our purposes. The Auditor is:
1 Obtaining Audit Evidence about the accuracy and completeness of the information
2 Evaluating whether the information is sufficiently precise and detailed for our purposes. (In some
cases, the auditor may intend to use information produced by the entity for other audit purposes. For
example, the auditor may intend to make use of the entity’s performance measures for the purpose of
analytical procedures, or to make use of the entity’s information produced for monitoring activities, such
as internal auditor’s reports. In such cases, the appropriateness of the audit evidence obtained is
affected by whether the information is sufficiently precise or detailed for the auditor’s purposes. For
example, performance measures used by management may not be precise enough to detect material
misstatements.)
Type of control
Verifications
Physical Controls and Counts
Authorizations and Approvals
Controls over IUC
Reconciliations
Controls with a Review Element
Uncorrected misstatement
a. Refer to both the current period’s figures and the corresponding figures in
the description of the matter giving rise to the modification when the effects or
possible effects of the matter on the current period’s figures are material; or
b. In other cases, explain that the audit opinion has been modified
because of the effects or possible effects of the unresolved matter on
the comparability of the current period’s figures and the
corresponding figures.
Control Environment
Risk Assessment
Information Systems
Control Activities
Minimum Practical Questionnaire for IFRSs & ISAs
Unmodified Modified
1Transfers to or fr om i nvestment pr operty clas sification
7) Financial ratios
Current ratio = Current assets/current liabilities
Gross profit (GP) ratio = GP/Sales
Net Profit (NP) ratio = NP/Sales
Return on equity = Profit after tax/share capital and reserves
To test for impairment, goodwill must be allocated to each of the acquirer's cash-generating
units.
A cash-generating unit to which goodwill has been allocated shall be tested for impairment at
least annually by comparing the carrying amount of the unit, including the goodwill, with the
recoverable amount of the unit: [IAS 36.90]
If the recoverable amount of the unit exceeds the carrying amount of the unit, the unit and the
goodwill allocated to that unit is not impaired
If the carrying amount of the unit exceeds the recoverable amount of the unit, the entity must
recognise an impairment loss.
The impairment loss is allocated to reduce the carrying amount of the assets of the unit (group
of units) in the following order: [IAS 36.104]
first, reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to the cash-generating unit (group of
units); and
then, reduce the carrying amounts of the other assets of the unit (group of units) pro rata on the
basis.
The carrying amount of an asset should not be reduced below the highest of: [IAS 36.105]
i) its fair value less costs of disposal (if measurable)
ii) its value in use (if measurable)
iii) zero.