The document outlines key questions and sub-topics regarding the evolution of insolvency legislation, the role of creditors, and the effectiveness of moratoriums in corporate debt restructuring. It addresses the influence of international practices, the challenges faced by different classes of creditors, and the accountability of insolvency professionals. Additionally, it discusses the need for future reforms to enhance the insolvency framework and balance business continuity with social objectives.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views
Questions
The document outlines key questions and sub-topics regarding the evolution of insolvency legislation, the role of creditors, and the effectiveness of moratoriums in corporate debt restructuring. It addresses the influence of international practices, the challenges faced by different classes of creditors, and the accountability of insolvency professionals. Additionally, it discusses the need for future reforms to enhance the insolvency framework and balance business continuity with social objectives.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4
Questions
1. Legislative and Policy Evolution
o How has recent insolvency legislation (and subsequent amendments) transformed the landscape of corporate debt restructuring and bankruptcy resolution? o To what extent have international models or global best practices (e.g., U.S. Chapter 11 or U.K. administration) influenced current national insolvency laws? 2. Significance of “Default” and Initiation of Proceedings o In practice, how have courts and tribunals interpreted the concept of “default” as a threshold for triggering insolvency? o Has the recent case law granting courts/tribunals some discretion (e.g., the Vidarbha decision) significantly altered the process or introduced uncertainties in initiating corporate insolvency? 3. Operational vs. Financial Creditors o What are the ongoing challenges in distinguishing between financial and operational creditors, and how does the classification affect the restructuring outcomes? o How effective are the safeguards ensuring operational creditors (including employees, trade unions, and smaller suppliers) are treated fairly, especially regarding voting rights and distributions? 4. Moratorium and “Calm Period” o In what ways has the moratorium under the law succeeded or failed in its goal of creating a “calm period” to facilitate genuine restructuring efforts? o Should there be further clarifications or exceptions (for instance, with quasi-criminal proceedings such as cheque-bounce matters under the NI Act or pending arbitration) to better balance creditor rights and debtor protection? 5. Role and Accountability of Insolvency Professionals o How have the powers of resolution professionals (RPs) evolved, and are there adequate checks to ensure fairness, transparency, and efficiency? o Have recent disciplinary proceedings and regulations improved the performance and accountability of insolvency professionals? 6. Judicial Review and “Commercial Wisdom” o Where do the courts draw the line between respecting the commercial decisions of creditors and ensuring a resolution plan complies with statutory requirements? o How do tribunals and appellate bodies manage the tension between swift resolutions and safeguarding stakeholders’ rights? 7. Treatment of Homebuyers and Other New Classes of Creditors o How has recognizing homebuyers as “financial creditors” impacted the real estate sector? o Are there emerging creditor categories that remain unaddressed or ambiguously placed within the statutory framework? 8. Cross-Border Insolvency and Enforcement o Have there been notable strides toward adopting or implementing a formal cross-border insolvency framework (e.g., UNCITRAL Model Law)? o What are the main challenges in recognizing and enforcing orders or judgments across jurisdictions? 9. Future Reforms o Which key reforms are needed to reduce delays, minimize litigation, and maximize value for all stakeholders? o How might the insolvency regime incorporate learnings from post-pandemic economic pressures and the evolving nature of distressed assets? 10. Public Policy and Social Considerations o To what extent should the law balance business continuity and financial stability against social objectives (like preserving jobs and community impact)? o Are we striking the right balance between creditors’ ability to recover debts and a debtor’s opportunity for a fresh start?
Sub-Topics
1. Legislative & Policy Framework
o Key milestones in recent amendments and how they’ve reshaped insolvency proceedings. o Significance of international benchmarks (e.g., U.S. Chapter 11, U.K. administration) on local reforms. o Pending bills or reform proposals that could address current loopholes or ambiguities. 2. Initiation of Insolvency & Defining ‘Default’ o Practical threshold for triggering insolvency and impact of judicial decisions. o Discretion of Adjudicating Authority (e.g., Vidarbha Industries case) and potential uncertainties. o Role of dispute resolution clauses in commercial contracts to preempt “premature” filings. 3. Classification of Creditors o Rationale behind the financial vs. operational creditor distinction and its effects on voting rights and recoveries. o Treatment of emerging creditor classes (e.g., homebuyers) as “financial creditors” — benefits and challenges. o Ensuring fairness for smaller creditors, trade unions, and employees: Are existing protections enough? 4. Moratorium & Asset Preservation o Moratorium as a “calm period”: Does it truly help sustain the debtor as a going concern? o Ambit of the moratorium with respect to parallel legal proceedings (arbitration, NI Act prosecutions). o Strategies to avoid abuse of the moratorium or undue delays in resolution. 5. Committee of Creditors (CoC) & Resolution Plans o Balancing “commercial wisdom” against judicial oversight: Where does one stop and the other begin? o Distribution waterfall (Section 53) and the question of “fair & equitable” treatment for all stakeholders. o Practical challenges in drafting, negotiating, and evaluating resolution plans within strict timelines. 6. Role & Accountability of Insolvency Professionals o Powers of resolution professionals: Are they too broad, too limited, or just right? o Oversight by regulators and the judiciary to maintain high standards of professionalism and ethics. o Common pitfalls in day-to-day administration and strategies to mitigate conflicts of interest. 7. Judicial & Appellate Authorities o Jurisdictional mandates and interplay between NCLT, NCLAT, Supreme Court, and other courts. o Evolving jurisprudence on corporate guarantees, personal insolvencies, and cross-appeals. o Speed vs. thoroughness: How to handle mounting caseloads without compromising due process. 8. Personal Guarantors & Individual Insolvency o Alignment of corporate debtor proceedings with those against personal guarantors. o Jurisdictional nuances: NCLT vs. DRT — practical experiences and challenges. o Post-resolution implications for personal guarantors under revised legal frameworks. 9. Cross-Border Insolvency o Current status of adopting the UNCITRAL Model Law or comparable frameworks. o Obstacles to enforcing foreign judgments and coordination among multiple jurisdictions. o Lessons from existing cross-border insolvency disputes and opportunities for reform. 10. Future Trends & Policy Considerations
Possible legislative refinements or amendments under
discussion. Impact of economic headwinds (e.g., post-pandemic fallout) on insolvency caseload and framework. Balancing expedient resolution with long-term stability, stakeholder interests, and public policy (jobs, social welfare).