The document outlines the principles of historical methodology, focusing on the use of primary and secondary sources, and the importance of critical analysis in history writing. It discusses the advantages and disadvantages of both source types, emphasizing the need for historians to verify authenticity and assess reliability. Additionally, it introduces historiography and the role of historians in organizing and interpreting past events.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views21 pages
Sources in History.pdf
The document outlines the principles of historical methodology, focusing on the use of primary and secondary sources, and the importance of critical analysis in history writing. It discusses the advantages and disadvantages of both source types, emphasizing the need for historians to verify authenticity and assess reliability. Additionally, it introduces historiography and the role of historians in organizing and interpreting past events.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 21
Lesson 2
Historical Methodology comprises certain
techniques and rules that historians follow in order to properly utilize sources and historical evidences in writing history.
Objects from the past
are called Artefacts Historical Criticisms • Internal Criticism • External Criticism – looks at the truthfulness and factuality of the evidence by – Verification of authenticity by looking at the author of the examining physical source, its context, the agenda characteristics; consistency behind its creation, the with the historical knowledge which informed it, characteristics of the time and its intended purpose when it was produced; materials used. – It looks at the content of the source examines the – We can ask the following circumstance of its production. questions: We can ask the following • When was it written? questions: • Where was it written? • Was it written by • Who was the real author? eyewitness or secondhand • Why did it survive? account (author)? • What were the materials • Why was it written used? • Is there consistency? Is your object a Primary of Secondary source?
• Sources which come directly from the
past, giving first-hand information are known as Primary Sources.
• Secondary sources are evidence that
comes from a later date. They are written after the event. Sources: • Secondary
• Primary Secondary Sources • Secondary sources are evidence that comes from a later date. They are written after the event.
• A textbook is a secondary source as
it was written long after most of the events that it describes Can you think of other examples of secondary sources? • Biography • Movies • TV or radio documentary • Internet • History books –(Many secondary sources are put together using many different primary sources) Where do we find sources?
Libraries Archives Museums
• Historians will use as many sources as possible and then compare what they have found. Why? –This is to make sure that the story of the past is as accurate as possible. –This is called cross- checking Why Use Primary Sources? Advantages Primary sources provide a window into the past— unfiltered access to the record of artistic, social, scientific and political thought and achievement during the specific period under study, produced by people who lived during that period these unique, often profoundly personal, documents and objects can give a very real sense of what it was like to be alive during a long-past era. Primary Source Disadvantages Questions of creator bias, purpose, and point of view may challenge students’ assumptions. Primary sources are often incomplete and have little context. Students must use prior knowledge and work with multiple primary sources to find patterns In analyzing primary sources, students move from concrete observations and facts to questioning and making inferences about the materials. Why Use Secondary Sources? Advantages provide analysis, synthesis, interpretation, or evaluation of the original information. are best for uncovering background or historical information about a topic and broadening your understanding of a topic by exposing you to others’ perspectives, interpretations, and conclusions. allows the reader to get expert views of events and often bring together multiple primary sources relevant to the subject matter. Secondary Source Disadvantages Their reliability and validity are open to question, and often they do not provide exact information They do not represent first hand knowledge of a subject or event There are countless books, journals, magazine articles and web pages that attempt to interpret the past and finding good secondary sources can be an issue Historiography history of all history Historiography is the history of history Historians are like detectives who gather information or evidence to put together the story of the past. They gather evidence from different sources e.g. archaeological digs, manuscripts or search the internet Tasks: Determine the credibility and motives of the author/ source--- genuine or authentic Discover the patterns and trends that governs the behaviour of the people, Make generalization Role of the Historian To look at the available historical sources and select the most relevant and meaningful for history and for the subject matter that he is studying To organize the past that is being created so that it can offer lessons for nations, societies and civilization To seek for the meaning of recovering the past to let the people see the continuing relevance of provenance, memory, remembering and historical understanding for both the present and the future. How do historians judge the reliability of sources? a) Bias – This means that the writer may have a strong , personal opinion about an event and tries to show that their opinion is right. b) Accurate – this means correct or exact. c) Prejudice – is where writers have made up their minds in advance and present only their own point of view d) Exaggerates –this is when a writer makes something seem greater than it really is. e) Propaganda – is where writers are trying to win the reader over to their point of view using posters, radio, tv and speeches How do Historians put events in order? • When historians find out information about the past, it is important to get events in the right order. –They usually use dates. • This makes it easier for people to follow the story of what happened. • This is called chronological order. There are number of ways historians measure time to describe past events. Timeline in History: 1. Circa, usually abbreviated c. or ca., means "approximately" in English, Italian and Slovak, usually referring to a date. Circa is widely used in genealogy and historical writing when the dates of events are not precisely known 2. A.D. = C.E 3. B.C. = B.C.E 4. Decade 5. Century 6. Periods or Ages 7. Millennium Individual Task/Activity • Identify an object in your respective home/house that represents something from the past, and that is important to you. • Identify if it is a primary or secondary source. • Draw/capture the object identified. • Briefly in 2 paragraphs explain what exactly this object represents about your past. • Rubrics (30 POINTS) Artistry/ Creativity 15 POINTS Application of 15 POINTS knowledge learned