(eBook PDF) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Introduction 2nd Edition download
(eBook PDF) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Introduction 2nd Edition download
https://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-qualitative-data-
analysis-an-introduction-2nd-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-qualitative-data-
analysis-with-atlas-ti-3rd-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-qualitative-data-
analysis-a-methods-sourcebook-4th-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/an-introduction-to-categorical-
data-analysis-3rd-edition-ebook-pdf/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-an-introduction-to-
statistical-methods-data-analysis-7th/
(eBook PDF) An Introduction to Categorical Data
Analysis by Alan Agresti
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-an-introduction-to-
categorical-data-analysis-by-alan-agresti/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-qualitative-research-
methods-collecting-evidence-crafting-analysis-communicating-
impact-2nd-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-introduction-to-
statistics-and-data-analysis-6th-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-an-introduction-to-
macroeconomics-a-heterodox-approach-to-economic-analysis-2nd-
edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-an-introduction-to-
biomechanics-solids-and-fluids-analysis-and-design-2nd-edition/
Newer qualitative approaches
10 Autoethnography
11 Poetic inquiry
Part 4
Analytic approaches for existing documentation
18 Narrative analysis
19 Conversation analysis
20 Discourse analysis
Part 5
Data management using qualitative computer programs
21 Coding
Part 6
Interpreting and presenting qualitative data
8
23 Theorising from data
Glossary
Index
Solutions to the exercises and PowerPoint slides for lecturers are available
at www.sagepub.co.uk/grbich2
9
About the author
Dr Carol Grbich is a Professor in the School of Medicine at Flinders
University in South Australia. She is an Epidemiologist and Sociologist
and is the author of a number of textbooks on Qualitative Research
including Qualitative Data Analysis: An Introduction 1st Edition (Sage,
2007), New Approaches in Social Research (Sage, 2004) and Qualitative
Research in Health: An Introduction (Allen and Unwin, 1999), as well as
authoring several texts on the Sociology of Health and Illness.
10
PART 1
11
the newer trends in research: the mixing of qualitative and quantitative
approaches, termed multiple or mixed methods.
Chapter 1 Introduction
Chapter 2 Design methodologies, data management and analytical
approaches
Chapter 3 Incorporating data from multiple sources: mixing methods
12
ONE
Introduction
KEY POINTS
The characteristics of qualitative research
The best topic areas for qualitative research investigations
Issues you need to think about prior to commencing research
Research paradigms
How to evaluate qualitative research
Introduction
13
Qualitative research is a fascinating topic. It provides detailed information
and can progress knowledge in a variety of areas: it can help assess the
impact of policies on a population; it can give insight into people’s
individual experiences; it can help evaluate service provision; and it can
enable the exploration of little-known behaviours, attitudes and values.
Knowledge is a key term here. This can take a variety of forms, and in
most cultures there are various claims to knowledge:
1 The first is tenacity – this refers to a belief that has been held for a long time,
for example doing good to others is viewed as the right thing to do because
eventually this good will be reflected back to you; there may be no evidence
to prove this is true but we still tenaciously claim that this is so.
2 Intuition or our gut feeling is another source of knowledge – for example, we
may feel that in a particular situation X is the best thing to do or the right
answer; there may again be very little evidence that this is so but if it feels
right, we tend to follow that particular path.
3 Authority – in particular religious or legal authority provides directions for the
way we ought to behave in order to lead a ‘good’ life … but good for whom?
In addition, would another way be more beneficial to us as individuals or as
part of a group?
14
There are two important aspects to any kind of research: the first is that
your data should be collected from the real world … from situations or
people involved in whatever the defined research problem is. This real
world evidence is termed empirical data. Understanding the nature of this
data is an ontological process and is related particularly to the wider
structural and cultural issues that influence claims to truth. Then these
understandings need to be further interpreted in a more abstract way using
existing theories of knowledge – epistemology – to explain your findings
about the world and to enable your interpretations to be more globally
applied. For example, I might research the experience of being blind by
interviewing people who are blind (empirical data). Understanding their
experiences would require knowledge of the culture and the health system
and other supports available for these people (ontological) while
interpreting their experiences might lead me to use the concepts of stigma
or normal versus abnormal (epistemology) to make sense of their
experiences.
15
phenomena
structural processes
historical changes.
In more detail, culture could involve anything from investigating the
behaviours and rituals of a particular tribe or group of people in a
particular setting (street kids, pupils or staff in a classroom, patients or
clinicians in a hospital ward or an individual in a particular cultural
context). Phenomena involves detailed investigations over time of a
particular experience (for example, marriage breakdown, illness etc.).
Structural processes might involve investigating policy change and its
impact on a specified setting or group (such as increasing taxes or closure
of mental institutions). And historical changes might involve documented
changes in discourses (ways of communicating over time; for example,
changes in treatment of an illness as recorded in medical journal articles).
The question focus is usually the what, how, when, where or why aspects
of the chosen topic.
One important issue the qualitative researcher needs to consider prior to
commencing research is the choice of research paradigm to work within.
Research paradigms
As researcher, you can choose which of the available broad paradigms
(worldviews of beliefs, values, and methods for collecting and interpreting
data) that you would prefer to work within. There are five options:
16
when positivism (the School of Philosophy that asserts that reality lies
only in things that can be seen with the naked eye), optimism, reason and
progress became the dominant discourses (ways of thinking, speaking and
writing) and all knowledge was believed to be accessible through
processes of reason. The ‘rational man’ was believed to have the capacity
to uncover a singular knowable reality through pure understanding and
rigorous intellectual reasoning. These processes of broader reason, needed
to gain knowledge, included a focus on observation in order to gain ‘facts’
via scientific deduction. Scientific knowledge gained from observation and
based in logical thought processes was seen as having the potential to
displace ignorance and superstition, which were the tools of power of the
church. Scientific knowledge was seen as having the capacity to facilitate
freedom from religious influences and to lead the way to a New World
built on the notions of progress and a universal foundation of knowledge.
However, researchers’ ability to provide predictable and replicable
outcomes and to control variables came under debate as Einstein’s theory
of relativity and later Heisenberg’s theory of uncertainty challenged these
views and postpositivism eventuated … The assumption that a world that
could be precisely measured and documented exists independently just
waiting for us to gain sufficiently sophisticated tools to discover it, was
questioned, and the belief that absolute, knowable truth existed became
sidelined and provisional truths became a more likely outcome. The
ultimate essence of external reality was also challenged by Sigmund
Freud’s exploration ([1900]1913) of the unconscious mind as a source of
reality construction. He suggested that ‘reality’ was not only constructed
from internal as well as external sources but that this reality changed
continually in interaction with the environment, especially in interaction
with others, and that what had previously been considered as externally
and objectively ‘real’ was also closely linked to the maintenance of power.
More recently within postpositivism it has been argued that scientists are
inherently biased by their education and life experiences and that their
observations are value-laden and fallible, making errors likely. Our ability
to know reality with certainty is thus problematic and no findings can be
viewed as absolute or universally generalisable. This has led some posi-
tivists to the modified epistemology of realism. Realism asserts that
structures creating the world cannot always be directly observed and when
and if they are observable their genesis is not always clear; thus we also
need our creative minds to clarify their existence and then to identify
explanatory mechanisms. For example, we cannot see gravity but we know
it exists and that it requires a mixture of intuition, various intellectual
17
processes, and the laws of physics in order to clarify the workings of this
force. The focus for research in a realist approach involves the
identification of the linking of different realisms, for example in nursing,
the biological and psychosocial models of nursing can be linked to a
biopsychosocial model that has bridging links to interpretations of
biological mechanisms and to the psychosocial empirical world as well as
to patients’ and researchers’ influences on these.
18
identify those who are powerless (usually exploited by those in powerful
positions) in order to document their unequal situation and to bring about
change through an active process of emancipation through knowledge-
sharing or the transformation of society. Any qualitative approach that has
taken a critical stance, including grounded theory, phenomenology,
ethnography, hermeneutics, sociolinguistics, narratives, and feminist
research (see later chapters for these) can fit into the critical emancipatory
grouping.
3. Constructionism/Interpretivism
These positions assume that there is no objective knowledge independent
of thinking. Reality is viewed as socially and societally embedded and
existing within the mind. This reality is fluid and changing, and knowledge
is constructed jointly in interaction by the researcher and the researched
through consensus. Knowledge is subjective, constructed and based on the
shared signs and symbols that are recognised by members of a culture.
Multiple realities are presumed, with different people experiencing these
differently. The research focus is on exploration of the way people
interpret and make sense of their experiences in the worlds in which they
live and how the contexts of events and situations and the placement of
these within wider social environments have impacted on constructed
understandings. The understandings researchers construct and impose
through interpretation are seen as limited by: the frames derived from their
own life experiences; subjectivity (the researcher’s own views and how
they have been constructed); and intersubjectivity (reconstruction of views
through interaction with others through language and written texts).
19
changes in the economy, science, art and architecture by portraying reality
as shifting and uncertain rather than set, and by incorporating multiple
perspectives from a range of disciplines such as music, philosophy,
psychology, sociology and drama as well as including visual possibilities.
Postmodernism views the world as complex and chaotic and reality as
multiply constructed and transitional – unable to be explained solely by
grand or meta narratives (such as Marxism and Buddhism, which make
universal claims to truth). Postmodernism is very sceptical of such
narratives, viewing them as containing power-laden discourses developed
specifically for the maintenance of dominant ideas or to enhance the power
of certain individuals. The search for reality ‘out there’ is qualified by the
understanding that society, laws, policies, language, discipline borders,
data collection and interpretation are culturally and socially constructed. In
recognition of this socially constructed world, disruption, challenge and a
multiplicity of forms are essential in order to pull these constructions apart
and to expose them for what they are. Meaning rather than knowledge is
sought because knowledge is limited by ‘desire’ (lack of knowledge or the
imperative to bring about change) and constrained by the discourses
developed to protect powerful interests and to control the population’s
access to other explanations. Truth is multifaceted and subjectivity is
paramount.
Poststructuralism, with its emphasis on the fluidity of language and
meaning, forms an important subset of postmodernism. It developed as a
reaction to structuralism, which sought to describe the world in terms of
systems of centralised logic and formal structures. In structuralism,
patterns provided meaning and all words were seen as having recognised
meanings that could be learned. Language was seen as a system of signs
and codes, rules and conventions – and the deep structures that enable a
language to operate within a cultural system – were sought.
Poststructuralism (see Chapter 14) seeks the deconstruction of the
discourses (ways of thinking, speaking and writing) that have been
established to control ways of thinking.
20
poststructuralism two data analytic approaches have become popular and
are available for use by qualitative researchers. The first is discourse
analysis, where the dominant ways of writing and speaking about a
particular topic become set in place over time and require historical
tracking back to identify who has benefited from one particular discourse
and how other competing discourses have been marginalised. The second
analytic approach is deconstruction, where words are viewed as containing
power-laden discourses with multiple meanings requiring careful
deconstruction in order to break down artificially constructed boundaries
before putting the text back together in transitional form.
5. Mixed/Multiple methods
This is the most recent approach and follows postmodernism’s exhortion
to cross barriers and to break down boundaries. The two approaches,
qualitative and quantitative – for decades seen as poles apart – have now
become integrated into mixed/multiple method studies (sometimes called
the third wave/third movement). In this situation, they are seen less as two
approaches ideologically poles apart and more as an eclectic set of tools
which you the researcher – very like the bricoleur (creative handyman) of
postmodernism – can use to provide the best answers to your research
question. Clearly the issues involved in utilising these very different
approaches can be somewhat thorny but this has not prevented researchers
from tackling these issues head on and providing ways of dealing with
them. The changes in classical physics which provide the underpinning for
quantitative approaches, particularly the movement into chaos and
complexity theory, have reflected many of the postmodern thought
changes seen in qualitative research (Grbich, 2004) and these changes may
have facilitated this cooperation. The ensuing paradigm has often become
termed ‘pragmatism’ – a mix of postpositivism and social constructivism,
a leaning toward postmodernism, and an emphasis on empirical
knowledge, action, triangulation and the changing interaction between the
organism and its environments (see Chapter 3 for more detail regarding
mixed methods).
21
centred position). Here an authoritative researcher would assume that
truth can be found by gathering detailed accurate observational and
interview data of the lives of young people living on the street.
Critical theory (with its focus on class, power and the location and
amelioration of oppression). Here the interpretation of the data you
collect would focus on power – where does it lie? And the assumption
would be that the structures of society (education, health and the
socioeconomic influences of the culture) would be determining aspects
for a situation where young people became homeless. Action research –
working with the homeless to bring about change – might be an
outcome.
Interpretivism/Constructionism (mutual recognition and use of symbols
and signs in reality construction). Both the aspects of individual choice
and lack of choice would be taken into account here as each individual
case is explored by you in conjunction with a homeless person.
Postmodernism and poststructuralism (the questioning of ‘truth’ and
‘reality’ and the sources of ‘knowledge’). Previous explanations would
be rigorously questioned and the discourses of ‘homelessness’,
‘begging’, ‘mental illness’ etc. examined and deconstructed. Your
assumption would be that the reasons young people are homeless are
individual, complex and always changing and no one solution will fit
all.
Mixed/Multiple methods. Both qualitative and quantitative data will be
needed to see broader aspects of individual circumstances within policy,
practice and the views of the wider community.
Clarification
What is the research question/s?
What are the aims of the research?
What did the researcher seek to investigate?
Does the research question reflect what has been investigated?
Have the aims been translated into the design so that all of them have
22
been accounted for?
Justification
Why is a qualitative approach the best option to answer this question?
Why was the particular qualitative research design chosen?
Why was the study undertaken the way it was? Are the questions, aims
and design a perfect match?
Were any forms of data triangulation evident? For example, multiple
sources, i.e., documents, interviews, survey data, observation; multiple
methods, i.e., mixing methodologies such as ethnography and
phenomenology; and multiple theories, where multiple theoretical and
conceptual frames have been applied to the research to enhance insights
into phenomena.
Process
Has ethics approval been obtained?
Have the techniques of data collection been clearly documented?
How were participants/settings accessed?
What sampling techniques have been used to answer the research
question?
Who was interviewed/observed? How often? And for how long?
What interview questions were asked?
What was the purpose of any observation/s?
Which existing documents were accessed? And how were they
assessed?
How was collected data managed?
Are all the forms of data analysis completely transparent?
What were the major outcomes of the analytical process in terms of
findings?
In more detail, the exposure of what the researcher actually did needs to be
very explicit.
How were participants accessed?
Who were these participants?
How was rapport achieved?
Were any sampling techniques used?
What data collection techniques were used?
How did interviews occur? Face to face? Telephone? Focus group?
Teleconference? Video conference? Email? Skype?
Who was observed? When? How often? For how long? For what
23
purpose? What existing sets of documentation were collected?
How was data managed?
What forms of data analysis were undertaken – transparency of process
is essential here.
Representativeness
Notions of comprehensiveness and diversify of results is sought in
qualitative research in preference to conformity and homogeneity. An
audit trail, monitoring changes and decisions taken in the project, should
be recorded in the researcher’s diary and made transparent where
applicable. In addition:
Have all the results been reported? Display of results is one aspect of
this, and hypertexts to the original data set so the reader can see where
your quotes have come from is becoming common.
Has a holistic answer to the research question been achieved?
Interpretation
Has a conceptual discussion of the results and linkage to existing
theory/new theory/ models of practice been developed to explain the
relevance of findings to a targeted audience or discipline?
Reflexivity
Has a clear statement of the impact of the researcher’s views upon the
data and the methods chosen been included?
How has researcher position and perspectives shaped the vision, slanted
the design and questions and affected the interpretation of results? Has
the researcher changed previous views on this topic? And has the
researcher provided a critique of her/his self in the research process
regarding their own history, culture, class, experiences and level of
empathy?
Diversity of process, capacity to connect and intertextuality (connections
with other relevant sources of influence) as well as the researcher’s own
epistemological positioning and ongoing response to research outcomes,
should also be evident.
Transferability
Has a critical evaluation of the application of findings to other similar
24
contexts been made?
How do results match/contradict others on this topic?
Has the relevance of these findings to current knowledge, policy, and
practice or to current research been discussed?
To what extent are findings applicable to other similar settings,
situations and experiences? And to what extent has this study
successfully contributed to knowledge?
Researcher position
Subjectivity is crucial here.
What have been the experiences of the researcher? Exposure of who the
author actually is (past influences, beliefs, values and experiences as
well as their responses in all situations) should be available.
Has the researcher been highly involved as a participant in his/her own
right or what has been her/his position?
How close to the participants’ view, voices, emotions and feelings is the
display of data and how much ‘shaping’ (changing or manipulating) has
the researcher been involved in?
Process
If the design involved small-scale mini-narratives where reality is seen as
multiply constructed, multiple methods (both qualitative and quantitative)
are often needed to present a holistic view of any situation or experience.
Juxtaposition will often be called upon to identify voices/perspectives that
have previously been marginalised or silenced by powerful discourses. The
emphasis will be on the complexity of both situations and language – in
particular via double coding, irony, paradox, the longevity of particular
25
Another Random Document on
Scribd Without Any Related Topics
Fig. 244.—Warriors of the Iron Epoch.
This sheath is composed of two very thin plates of wrought iron laid
one upon the other, except at the base, where they are united by
means of a cleverly-wrought band of iron. At its upper extremity
there is a plate, on one side of which may be seen the designs which
we have already described, and on the other a ring, intended to
suspend the weapon to the belt.
The lance-heads are very remarkable on account of their
extraordinary shape and large size. They measure as much as 16
inches long, by 2 to 4 inches wide, and are double-edged and
twisted into very diversified shapes. Some are winged, and others
are irregularly indented. Some have perforations in the shape of a
half-moon (fig. 250). The halberd of the middle ages was, very
probably, nothing but an improvement on, or a deviation from, these
singular blades.
Fragments of wooden staves have been met with which had been
fitted into these spear-heads; they are slender, and shod with iron at
one end.
The care with which these instruments are wrought proves that they
are lance-heads, and not mere darts or javelins intended to be
thrown to a distance and consequently lost. They certainly would not
have taken so much pains with the manufacture of a weapon which
would be used only once.
It is altogether a different matter with respect to the javelins, a
tolerably large number of which have been found in the lacustrine
settlements of La Tène. They are simple socketed heads (fig. 251),
terminating in a laurel-leaf shape, about 4 to 5 inches in length.
The sickles (fig. 254) are likewise larger and also more simple than
those of the bronze epoch; there are neither designs nor ornaments
of any kind on them.
Fig. 254.—Sickle.
The iron fittings at the ends of the boat-hooks used by the boatmen
on the lake are frequently found at La Tène; they terminate in a
quadrangular pyramid or in a cone (fig. 256). Some still contain the
end of the wooden pole, which was attached to it by means of a
nail.
Fig. 256.—Iron Point of Boat-hook, used by the Swiss Boatmen during the Iron
Epoch.
Next in order to these objects, we must mention the horses' bits and
shoes; the first being very simply constructed so as to last for a very
long period of time. They were composed of a short piece of iron
chain (fig. 257), which was placed in the horse's mouth, and
terminated at each end in a ring to which the reins were attached.
Fig. 262.—Razor.
ebooksecure.com