IT Ticket Analysis
IT Ticket Analysis
Objective Questions:
1. What is the total no. of attributes present in the data?
The "Tickets" sheet has 10 attributes (columns), and the "IT Agents" sheet
has 6 attributes.
2. Which columns have inconsistent or missing values, and what is the count
of such values?
The distribution of ticket categories are Login Access, System, Software and
Hardware.
5. How many tickets has each agent handled?
6. How can you extract the domain from the email addresses in the IT Agents
sheet?
To extract the email address in the IT agents we can use mid() and find()
string functions combined.
=MID(C2,FIND("@",C2)+1,FIND(".",C2,FIND("@",C2))-FIND("@",C2)-1)
7. How can you find the full name of an agent given their Agent ID?
i.e =vlookup(agent_id,table_array,column_index,match_mode)
The count of issue for IT ERROR and IT Request is 24278 and 73220.
The average of daily average resolution time for tickets is 4.55 days per ticket.
The volume of tickets has changed significantly over time. It has increased to
29088 in the year 2020 from 13051 in the year 2016.
Firstly I calculated the date of birth in the IT Agents sheet using date function
=DATE(D2,E2,F2).
As we can observe when the severity of issue is “Urgent” the resolution time
is taken by agents is the least as compared to other types.
Also when the severity of issue is “Normal” the resolution time taken by agent
is the most.
We need to put more efforts into solving normal severity tickets along with
other types so that the satisfaction rate will also get a elevation.
13. How many categorical columns are there in the data? [Search about
categorical and continuous data, and try to answer this question]
Hiring more IT agents is likely to reduce resolution times by increasing the team's capacity
to handle tickets promptly. As the below line graph shows that the ticket volume keeps on
increasing over the years. The variation in the handling of such tickets by limited agents can
be a vital indication of hiring more agents as well as training them.
Improving training programs can enhance both satisfaction rates and resolution times.
Skilled agents are better equipped to resolve issues efficiently and provide a superior
customer experience. If agent-level data shows significant variance in resolution
performance, targeted training can bridge these gaps. Additionally, training can address
patterns identified in tickets, as seen in the "Tickets" or "Request Categories" sheets, to
reduce repetitive issues.
6 4
5
4 0.3138081046826
3 29
2
1
0
Hardware Login Access Software System
Request Categories
Conclusion-
A comprehensive review of the above factors will clarify which investment yields the
best return.
For instance, if bottlenecks are caused by high workload and delays, hiring more
agents is the most effective choice.
If inefficiencies stem from skill gaps, training should be prioritized. If tools are
outdated, software upgrades may be critical.
A balanced approach, combining two or more options, might provide the best results
for both resolution speed and customer satisfaction.
2. Which agents need additional training based on their performance
metrics?
Analysis: Identify agents with the lowest satisfaction ratings and longest
resolution times.
Insights:
To identify agents who need additional training based of their performance metrics,
the highest value for average satisfaction rate of an employee is 4.59 and the lowest
value if average resolution time is 5.55 days.
So we can consider ideal values for agents who require improvement as below:
Average Satisfaction Rate < 3.65
Average Resolution Time > 5 days
Which will give the list of agents who require additional training.
Visualization:
Row Average of Average of Resolution
Labels Satisfaction Rate Time (Days) Name of Agents
6 3.592611596 5.32067727 A. Trejo
25 3.601259182 5.204616999 Sandra Lujan
28 3.612024666 5.409558068 Nurio Zepeda
3 3.615042058 5.381989114 Elena Velez
22 3.628179044 5.511190234 Lorena
Insights:
As per the analysis there are four different request categories as Hardware,
Software, System and Login Access. Each request category has a different
resolution time which is as follows:
Hardware -7.62539813
Login Access-0.313808105
Software -5.238732754
System -6.615609456
Visualization-
A ver age R es o l uti o n T i m e by R es o l uti o n C atego r y
10
8
Resolution Time
6
4
2
0
H ar dw ar e L o gi n A c c e s s So ft w a r e Sy s t e m
4. How effective are the current software
Request Categoriestools in managing IT tickets?
Analysis: Evaluate performance metrics before and after the
implementation of new tools.
Visualization:
Insights:
If we consider that there were new software tools upgraded to handle the
tickets after 2017, we are able to see a spike in satisfaction rate from 2018 to
2020.
If any new implementation were made then surely it has affected the software
tools on a greater extend.
Also the there are improvements needed toward Login Access and Hardware
Categories in order to get more satisfaction rate.\
5. How has the performance of the IT support team changed over time
(e.g.,monthly or quarterly)?
Insights:
Consistent Improvement (2016–2019): The IT support team's satisfaction
rates show a steady upward trend, improving year by year, with the highest
performance in 2019.
Peak Performance in 2019: Satisfaction rates across all quarters in 2019 were
above 4.13, with Q2 reaching the highest value (4.14).
Insights:
Investing more on hardware and software would have a positive impact on the
hardware, software as well as login access categories resulting in better
resolution time and possibly increasing the satisfaction rate.
As for login access the resolution time is the lowest and it does not require
any specific improvements.
Visualization-
7. What are the key performance metrics for IT agents, and how can they
be
improved, do we need to fire any agents?
Analysis: Define and analyse metrics such as average handling time,
satisfaction scores, and number of tickets resolved.
Visualization-
Insights:
From both the charts we are able to tell that there is a slight difference
between resolution time and the ticket count of each agent is different with a
minor change in average satisfaction values.
There are 50 agents in total who have handled 97498 tickets over 1827 days.
Over this spam the average satisfaction rate was 4.10 and the average
resolution time as 4.55 days.
The least average satisfaction rate value 3.59 is for Agent No–6 also the most
average resolution time taken is 5.5 days by Agent No–22. Based on this analysis
we can improve these agents skills with an additional training along with the below
mentioned agents or decide to fire them if we are able to hire the right people for the
8.
Row Average of Satisfaction Average of Resolution Time
Labels Rate (Days) Name of Agents Age
6 3.592611596 5.32067727 A. Trejo 36
25 3.601259182 5.204616999 Sandra Lujan 36
28 3.612024666 5.409558068 Nurio Zepeda 42
3 3.615042058 5.381989114 Elena Velez 31
22 3.628179044 5.511190234 Lorena 28
How do employee demographics (e.g., department, seniority) impact
satisfaction and ticket outcomes?
Analysis: Segment analysis using filters and pivot tables.
Insights:
In order to analyse the data more efficiently, the age has been grouped into 5 groups
which starts from 28-32 as lowest to 48-52 as the highest.
If we observe the age group 33-37 is performing the least with the values of Average
Satisfaction Rate = 3.98 and Average Resolution Time= 4.84.
The senior most age group 48-52 is performing the most in aspects of Average
Resolution Time= 4.11.
The age group 28-32 is performing the most in aspects of Average Satisfaction
Visualization-
Insights:
The peak times when the tickets volume is more than average is in Quarter 4
of every year and peak value is 7684 in 2020.
Also Quarter-1 and Quarter-2 of every year show stable times as compared to
other Quarters of every year.
The Year 2016 was the most stable as in every quarter as the ticket volume
not took much jump and maintained values between 3200-3300.
Visualization-
10. What metrics should be included in the final dashboard to provide
comprehensive view of call centre performance and guide investment
decisions?
Ticket count trends over time and by category to understand volume and
focus areas.
Satisfaction rates segmented by time, age group, and ticket severity to gauge
customer experience.
Trends in satisfaction rate and resolution time across years, quarters, and
months for long-term insights.
Ensure that you put the slicers for choosing the priority wise and year in order
to observe the dashboard since the management will be having a long
discussion which can go for weeks.