Scribd
Upload
2 views

Rubric for Final Research Proposal Defense

The document outlines a rubric for evaluating final research proposal defenses across five criteria: Organization, Delivery, Content, Media and Resources, and Response to Questions. Each criterion is rated on a scale from 2 to 5, with descriptions for each level of performance. The rubric aims to provide a structured assessment of the presentation skills and content knowledge of the speakers.

Uploaded by

Gian Michael Abad
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
2 views

Rubric for Final Research Proposal Defense

The document outlines a rubric for evaluating final research proposal defenses across five criteria: Organization, Delivery, Content, Media and Resources, and Response to Questions. Each criterion is rated on a scale from 2 to 5, with descriptions for each level of performance. The rubric aims to provide a structured assessment of the presentation skills and content knowledge of the speakers.

Uploaded by

Gian Michael Abad
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

RUBRIC FOR FINAL RESEARCH PROPOSAL DEFENSE

CRITERIA Undeveloped Developing Satisfactory Outstanding Score


( 2) (3) (4) (5)
Organization Speaker/s Speaker/s Presentation Speaker/s highly
disorganized; adequately follows logical organized, easy
jumped topics organized sequence to follow,
smooth
transitions
Delivery Paper was read or Some parts of In most Speech was
seemed the instances, the smooth, clear
memorized. presentation presentation and articulate.
Speech was too was delivered went smoothly. There was voice
fast/too slow/too well, other There were projection and
soft. No eye parts were not. minor snags in pacing was
contact. Delivery Attempts were delivery. effective. There
stiff and unsure made to adjust was eye contact.
pace of Delivery was
delivery. poised.
Content Presentation was Content was Presentation A general
not apt to topic adequate. was sufficient. audience could
nor audience. There were In most understand the
Background attempts to instances, the presentation.
information provide content was Key terms were
and/or background appropriate. defined and
assumptions were information background
lacking. information
provided
Media and Media and format There were Satisfactory Excellent media
Resources were poor choice many media media format for
for content. glitches. Some presentation. content. All
Materials were slides were There were materials were
confusing or Very however some clear and
distracting. distracting. Not lapses information was
Speaker/s not in all speaker/s pertinent.
business attire. were in
business attire.
Response to Misunderstands Some Group was able Group was able
Questions questions; cannot questions to answer most to answer
answer misunderstood of the questions questions well
convincingly. and well. There and with
There was a lot of inadequately were occasions reference to
fumbling about. addressed. though when own work.
Group was group was not Showed
easily rattled too confident knowledge of
but managed about the subject matter
to sail through. subject matter.
TOTAL

You might also like