Development of a Carbon Soot Collector for Vehicle Emissions: Recycling Carbon Black Into Usable

Ink to Mitigate Air Pollution

MATRIX OF PANEL MEMBERS COMMENTS/SUGGESTIONS

Panel Member Comments/Suggestions Action Taken

●​ Mr. Cristopher M. De ●​ Approval Sheet ●​ Approval Sheet

Ocampo,PhD 1. Complete the name of 1. Completed.
your panel of examinees. 2. Changed.
2. No H on my name. 3. Used.
"CRISTOPHER M. DE OCAMPO, ●​ Acknowledgment
PhD" 1. Included
3. Use gender neutrality in ●​ Dedication
your manuscript. Use 1. Included
CHAIRPERSON, not Chairman. 2. No action.
Acknowledgment ●​ Abstract
1. Include your initials 1. Done.
Dedication 2. Added a brief
1. Include your explanation.
initials/names 3. Made abstract more
2. Why inverted triangle? concise to fit the word
Abstract count.
1. Indent the first word. ●​ Table of Contents
2. What is carbon soot? 1. Done.​
3. What is the maximum 2. Included
number of words? ●​ List of tables​
Table of Contents 1. Done.​
1. The word 2. Done.
"APPENDICES" should be on the ●​ List of figures​
left part aligned to V.Summary.... 1. Done.​
2. Include pages for the list 2. Done.
of tables and list of figures. CHAPTER I
List of tables ●​ Introduction and
1. Make it on another page. Background of the Study
2. Double space (if, 1. Added a positive
according to your format) beginning.
List of figures 2. Followed the format
1. Make it on another page. (Context, Foreign/Global
2. Double space (if, Perspective, Local
according to your format) Perspective, Legal Bases,
CHAPTER I Research Gaps/Problems,
Introduction and Background of Rationale)
the Study ●​ Theoretical Framework
1. Make your first statement
a positive beginning.

​
​
 2. Suggestion: Context, 1. Added a theoretical
Foreign/Global Perspective, Local framework, the circular
Perspective, Legal Bases, economy.
Research Gaps/Problems, ●​ Conceptual Framework
Rationale 1. Figure adequately
1.​ What is your rationale? explained.
Theoretical Framework 2. Improved the design of
1. No theoretical framework the framework.
Conceptual Framework 3. No space left.
1. Expiain your figure i. 4. No action taken.
Revise your conceptual framework. ●​ Operational Framework
2. Make a better 1. Justified.
presentation of your paradigm. You 2. Added the subtitle
may use different shapes to make it detailing what is the operational
more presentable. framework.
3. Do not leave space. You 3. Improved the design of
may add more discussions on your the framework.
results. ●​ Statement of the
4. Too recent theory. Problem​
1. Done.
Operational Framework 2. Added introductory
2. Justify your paragraphs paragraph detailing the
(pages 8 - 10) output
4. What is the operational 3. Yes, there is.
framework? 4. No space left.
5. Make a better ●​ Significance of the Study​
presentation of your paradigm. You 1. Added more groups of
may use different shapes to make it people who will benefit
more presentable. from the study.
Statement of the Problem ●​ Scope and Limitation​
1. Start with small letters for 1. Checked the grammar​
1.1. functionality, and 1.2. durability. 2. Explained the
Also, with 3.1., and 3.2. boundaries of the study,
2. What is your output? like how the study will not
3. Is there a hypothetical tackle marketability.
question? ●​ Definition of Terms​
4. Do not leave space. 1. Done.
Significance of the study CHAPTER II​
1. Make your study 1. Indented​
significant to a person/ people. 2. Variables grouped
Scope and limitation according to SOPs
1. Keep your grammar CHAPTER III
correct. Check your sentences. ●​ Research Design​
2. What are the boundaries 1. Explained why we used
of your study? descriptive research.
Definition of terms ●​ Respondents of the
1. Make it into conceptual Study​
and operational definitions. 1. Added an in-depth

​
​
 Conceptual (references), explanation as to why the
operational (used in the study). researchers chose that
CHAPTER II particular number.​
1. Indent the first word. 2. See above.​
2. Group your variables 3. Added the table
aligned to use SOP for better detailing the distribution of
usage in your result and respondents.
discussion. ●​ Research Locale​
CHAPTER III 1. Explained why Bixby
Research Design teachers have more
1. Why experimental? Your experiences on writing
SOPs were aligned into descriptive whiteboard.​
research. 2. Illustration of the locale
Respondents of the Study included.
1. Why 30? Does the ●​ Research Instrument​
number of respondents suffice the 1. Improved the
total number of populations? explanations about the
2. How do you determine research instrument​
the number of your respondents? 2. Followed the guide
3. Make a table for the CVAS (Construction,
respondents of the study for the Validation, Administration
proper distribution of respondents. and Scoring Response)
Research Locale ●​ Data Gathering
1. What are your bases that Procedure​
Bixby teachers have more 1. Not anymore.​
experiences on writing whiteboard? 2. Rewrote so it’s more
2. You may include concise and precise
illustration of your locale. ●​ Ethical Consideration​
Research Instrument 1. Added sentences that
1. Make a better discussion highlighted the voluntary
of your instrument consideration of the
2. Guide: CVAS respondents.
(Construction, Validation, ●​ Statistical Treatment​
Administration and Scoring 1. Elaborated the statistical
Response) treatments used, which is
Data Gathering Procedure the weighted mean and
1. Is it more on ChatGPT? the standard deviation.​
2. Make a concise and 2. Likert scale figure and
precise procedure Acceptability figure were
Ethical Consideration removed.
1. Include and ensure the CHAPTER IV​
voluntary consideration of the 1. ​
respondents. 2. No space left.
Statistical Treatment CHAPTER V
1. Elaborate the treatment ●​ Findings​
to be used such as weighted mean 1. Used the same
and SD. Then, discuss your numbering that is found in
the SOP

​
​
 treatment as it was used in the ●​ Conclusion​
study. 1. Rewritten.​
2. Some should not include 2. Revised and rewritten.​
here such as Likert scale and the 3. Done.
likes. ●​ Recommendation​
CHAPTER IV 1.General
1. Present your results and recommendations given.
discussion aligned to your SOP. ●​ Bibliography​
2. Do not leave space. You 1. APA 7th format used.​
may add more discussions on your 2. No action taken.
results. ●​ Curriculum Vitae​
CHAPTER V 1. Used a different format
Findings for the vitae, removing the
1. Use the proper character reference in the
numbering aligned to your SOP. process.
Conclusion
1. More on ChatGPT.
2. Summarize your
conclusions properly.
3. # of SOP equals # of
conclusions
Recommendations
1. Make a general
recommendation
Bibliography
1. Use the correct format
2. You may group your
references according to: Books,
Journals/Periodicals,
Theses/Dissertations, Online
Sources and Other Sources.
Curriculum Vitae
1. Why is there a character
reference?

●​ Mr. Parker Gino P. Foster, LPT ●​ Explain the need for 30 ●​ Added an in-depth explanation
respondents. in the Respondents of the
Study as to why the
researchers chose that
particular number.

​
​
●​ Mr. Jerome Matthew Cornelia ●​ 3D Blueprint of the prototype ●​ Made a 3D product of the
and product prototype and the marker.
●​ Raised concerns about the ●​ Added a related literature in
safety of carbon black ink to the Background of the Study
which the researchers needed that answers the concerns
to address in their paper raised.

Prepared by:

Patricia Nicole F. Benedicto

Researcher

​
​