Document (2)
Document (2)
Let’s explore how PMS benefits the automobile industry in different areas:
The automobile sector relies on assembly lines, automation, and robotics, requiring a
highly productive workforce.
PMS helps identify top performers and laggards, ensuring efficient resource allocation.
Companies set Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) such as:
o Number of units produced per hour
o Defect rate per 1,000 vehicles
o Machine downtime percentage
o Employee attendance and punctuality
Example: Toyota’s Production System (TPS) uses PMS to track productivity at every stage of
the supply chain, ensuring continuous improvement (Kaizen).
Automobile companies implement PMS to monitor quality control (QC) at every stage
of manufacturing.
Quality benchmarks include:
o Zero-defect production
o Compliance with ISO standards (ISO 9001 for quality management)
o Meeting customer satisfaction targets
Example: Mercedes-Benz follows Six Sigma principles in its PMS to reduce manufacturing
defects and improve customer satisfaction.
Example: Tesla’s innovation-driven PMS evaluates engineers on the speed of software updates
and battery efficiency improvements.
The automobile industry has a mix of skilled labor, engineers, and sales teams,
requiring customized PMS strategies.
Performance-based bonuses, promotions, and training programs improve job
satisfaction.
Employee attrition rate is a key metric in PMS, helping HR teams implement better
retention strategies.
Example: Ford’s performance-based pay system rewards employees who exceed efficiency
and sales targets.
Just-in-Time (JIT) manufacturing and lean supply chains require PMS to track
logistics performance.
KPIs include:
o On-time delivery rates
o Inventory turnover ratio
o Supplier performance metrics
Example: BMW’s supplier evaluation system uses PMS to assess vendor reliability and
optimize the supply chain.
While PMS offers many advantages, the automobile industry faces challenges in
implementation:
Overview: This study explores the hierarchical structure and interconnections of strategic factors
influencing performance in Indian automobile manufacturing enterprises. Utilizing the Flexible
Strategy Game-Card framework and Total Interpretive Structural Modeling (TISM), the research
identifies leading and lagging performance factors through semi-structured interviews and
thematic content analysis.
Key Findings:
The study presents a strategic performance management model tailored for Indian
automobile enterprises, highlighting the importance of understanding the relationships
between various performance factors.
It emphasizes the need for a structured approach to performance management that aligns
with the unique challenges and opportunities within the Indian automotive sector.
Overview: This research investigates the performance appraisal techniques employed by Tata
Motors and assesses employee attitudes toward the system. Through structured questionnaires
administered to supervisory-level employees at Tata Motors' Jamshedpur plant, the study
evaluates the impact of the appraisal system on productivity.
Key Findings:
The majority of employees were aware of and satisfied with the performance appraisal
process at Tata Motors.
The performance appraisal system had a positive impact on employee productivity,
indicating its effectiveness in enhancing performance within the organization.
Overview: This paper addresses the underperformance in the vehicle after-sales services sector
of the automotive industry. It proposes a framework based on questionnaires and surveys
conducted among managers of car service organizations in Bucharest, aiming to identify critical
factors affecting business performance.
Key Findings:
The study identifies deficiencies and risks within the after-sales services sector,
emphasizing the need for effective performance management strategies.
It highlights the importance of leadership, strategic planning, management systems,
customer management, human resources management, risk management, and results
evaluation in enhancing performance.
Key Insights:
Performance management systems are crucial for setting clear performance expectations
and providing regular feedback, leading to increased productivity and profitability.
Effective performance management aids in identifying training needs and skill gaps,
thereby improving overall operational efficiency.
Companies set KPIs for research teams, such as patents filed and time taken for
prototype development.
Example: Ford evaluates R&D teams based on innovation output and market
adoption rates.
1. Resistance to Change
o Unions and employees often resist new performance evaluation systems due to
concerns over fairness.
o Example: Maruti Suzuki faced worker protests when implementing automated
PMS.
2. Balancing Human & Automation Performance Metrics
o The rise of robotics and AI in manufacturing requires new performance metrics
for both human employees and automated systems.
3. Standardization Across Global Units
o Large automakers operate in multiple countries, making it difficult to maintain
uniform performance standards.
o Example: General Motors struggled with aligning PMS across its North
American, European, and Asian factories.
4. Data-Driven Performance Monitoring Issues
o AI-powered PMS relies on real-time data, which requires massive investment
in digital infrastructure.
o Example: Volkswagen’s AI-based performance analytics faced technical
challenges in data accuracy and security.
Automakers are incorporating carbon footprint reduction goals into employee KPIs.
Example: BMW evaluates managers based on eco-friendly production goals.
Companies are focusing on stress management, mental health, and flexible work
schedules.