Fundamental Rights - Article 25-28
Fundamental Rights - Article 25-28
Article 25 says that all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right to
freely profess, practice and propagate religion. The implications of these are:
(a) Freedom of conscience: Inner freedom of an individual to mould his relation with God
or Creatures in whatever way he desires.
(b) Right to profess: Declaration of one’s religious beliefs and faith openly and freely.
(c) Right to practice: Performance of religious worship, rituals, ceremonies and exhibition
of beliefs and ideas.
(d) Right to propagate: Transmission and dissemination of one’s religious beliefs to others
or exposition of the tenets of one’s religion. But, it does not include a right to convert
another person to one’s own religion. Forcible conversions impinge on the ‘freedom of
conscience’ guaranteed to all the persons alike.
From the above, it is clear that Article 25 covers not only religious beliefs (doctrines) but
also religious practices (rituals). Moreover, these rights are available to all persons–citizens
as well as non- citizens.
However, these rights are subject to public order, morality, health and other provisions
relating to fundamental rights. Further, the State is permitted to:
(a) regulate or restrict any economic, financial, political or other secular activity associated
with religious practice; and
(b) provide for social welfare and reform or throw open Hindu religious institutions of a
public character to all classes and sections of Hindus.
1
Article 25 also contains two explanations: one, wearing and carrying of kirpans is to be
included in the profession of the Sikh religion; and two, the Hindus, in this context, include
Sikhs, Jains and Buddhists.
According to Article 26, every religious denomination or any of its section shall have the
following rights:
(a) Right to establish and maintain institutions for religious and charitable purposes;
The Supreme Court held that a religious denomination must satisfy three conditions:
(a) It should be a collection of individuals who have a system of beliefs (doctrines) which
they regard as conducive to their spiritual well-being;
Under the above criteria, the Supreme Court held that the ‘Ramakrishna Mission’ and
‘Ananda Marga’ are religious denominations within the Hindu religion. It also held that
Aurobindo Society is not a religious denomination.
Article 27 lays down that no person shall be compelled to pay any taxes for the promotion
or maintenance of any particular religion or religious denomination. In other words, the
State should not spend the public money collected by way of tax for the promotion or
maintenance of any particular religion. This provision prohibits the State from favouring,
patronising and supporting one religion over the other. This means that the taxes can be used
for the promotion or maintenance of all religions.
2
This provision prohibits only levy of a tax and not a fee. This is because the purpose of a fee
is to control secular administration of religious institutions and not to promote or maintain
religion. Thus, a fee can be levied on pilgrims to provide them some special service or
safety measures. Similarly, a fee can be levied on religious endowments for meeting the
regulation expenditure.
Under Article 28, no religious instruction shall be provided in any educational institution
wholly maintained out of State funds. However, this provision shall not apply to an
educational institution administered by the State but established under any endowment or
trust, requiring imparting of religious instruction in such institution.
Further, no person attending any educational institution recognised by the State or receiving
aid out of State funds shall be required to attend any religious instruction or worship in that
institution without his consent. In case of a minor, the consent of his guardian is needed.
Reference: