Integration by Parts
Integration by Parts
1. Fig. 8 shows the curve y = f(x), where f(x) = (1 − x)e2x, with its turning point P.
i. Write down the coordinates of the intercepts of y = f(x) with the x- and y-axes.
[2]
[6]
iii. Show that the exact area of the region enclosed by the curve and the x- and y-axes is
.
[5]
[4]
v. Write down the exact area of the region enclosed by the curve y = g(x) and the x- and
y-axes.
[1]
2. Fig. 9 shows the curve y = xe−2x together with the straight line y = mx, where m is a constant,
with 0 < m < 1. The curve and the line meet at O and P. The dashed line is the tangent at P.
[3]
[4]
You are given that OP and this tangent are equally inclined to the x-axis.
[4]
iv. Find the exact area of the shaded region between the line OP and the curve.
[7]
3.
4.
Fig. 10
Find, in terms of k, the area of the finite region between the curve and the x-axis. [8]
Fig. 15
The curve y = ln x passes through the point (a, b), where a > 1.
The area A is bounded by the x-axis, the line x = a and the curve y = ln x.
The area B is bounded by the x-axis, the y-axis, the line y = b and the curve y = ln x.
The value of a is found using the Newton-Raphson method on a spreadsheet. The output is
shown in Fig. 15.
Fig. 15
Heidi states that the value of a is 4.921554 correct to 6 decimal places.
(b) Determine whether she is correct. [2]
x = 0, y = 1; y = 0, x = 1
Examiner's Comments
1 i (1, 0) and (0, 1) B1B1
The points of intersection were a write-down
for many candidates. Weaker attempts failed
to solve (1 – x) e2x = 0 convincingly.
ii A1cao x=½
allow ½ e1 isw
Examiner's Comments
iii
A1
NB AG
Examiner's Comments
iii
Most candidates applied integration by parts to
A1cao
either ∫(1 – x) e2xdx or ∫x e2xdx, using
appropriate u, v’, u’ and v. Sign and/or bracket
errors sometimes meant they failed to derive
the correct result, but many were fully correct.
B1
Examiner's Comments
Examiner's Comments
Total 18
i ⇒ − 2x = lnm
i ⇒ x = − ½ ln m* A1 NB AG
i or
i = − ½ ln m × m A1
Examiner's Comments
i so P lies on y = mx A1
ii let u = x, u′ = 1, v = e−2x, v′ = − 2e−2x M1* product rule consistent with their derivs
Examiner's Comments
ii = elnm+ elnm ln m [ = m + m ln m] A1cao but not − 2(− ½ ln m), but mark final ans
The product rule here was generally well done,
followed by substituting x = - ½ ln m, where
some sign errors occurred. Some left the eln
m terms unresolved, which was condoned
iii ⇒ ln m = − 2
iii ⇒ m = e−2* A1 NB AG
iii or
y + ½mlnm = m(1 + lnm)(x + ½ lnm) x = − lnm, y = 0 ⇒ ½mlnm = m(1 + lnm)(−½ lnm) for fully correct methods finding xintercept of
iii B2
⇒ 1 + ln m = − 1, ln m = − 2, m = e−2 equation of tangent and equating to − ln m
iii At P, x = 1 B1
isw approximations
Examiner's Comments
iv
Area under curve
iv A1ft ft their v
iv A1
iv Area of triangle = ½ base × height M1 ft their 1, e−2 or [e−2x2/2] o.e. using isosceles triangle
Examiner's Comments
Total 18
A1 ignore limits
A1cao
Examiner's Comments
Total 5
A1
= 4 ln 4 − 8 − (2ln 1 − 4)
Examiner's Comments
= 4 ln 4 − 4 A1cao oe (eg ln 256 − 4) but must evaluate ln 1 = 0
Integration by parts was well understood, with
just under half candidates scoring full marks for
this question. Very occasionally, candidates
Total 5
A1(AO1.1)
M1(AO1.1a)
5
let u = x, u′ = 1 , v′ = e2x, A1(AO1.1)
A1(AO1.1)
A1(AO2.5)
[7]
Do not
Total 7
Integration
by parts,
allow sign
M1(AO3.1a) errors only
for M1
A1(AO1.1b)
all correct
M1(AO2.1)
Integration
by parts,
A1(AO1.1b) allow sign
6
errors only
for M1
M1(AO2.1)
A1(AO1.1b)
convincing
attempt,
[6] allow sign
–2x2cos 2x + 2x sin 2x + cos 2x + c error and/or
omission of
+ c at this
all correct
AG
Total 6
Using
substitution
including dx
Simplifying
correctly
M1(AO1.1b)
A1(AO1.1b)
First use of
integration
M1(AO3.1a) by parts
Use integration by parts
Second use
of
= u2eu − 2(ueu − ∫ u2eu du)
integration
A1(AO1.1b)
by parts
= u2eu − 2ueu + 2eu + c [6]
= x(ln x)2 − 2x ln x + 2x + c
Must be in
terms of x
for final
mark
M1 (AO 3.1a)
y = (k – x)ln x = 0
Attempt to
solve
Either k – x = 0 or ln x = 0 y=0
x = k or 1 A1 (AO 1.1b)
M1 (AO 2.1)
8 Let
A1
(AO 1.1b) Using
integration by
M1 (AO 3.1a)
parts with
A1 (AO 1.1b)
u=
ln x,
M1dep (AO clearly argued
1.1a)
Allow without
limits
A1 (AO 1.1b)
[8]
Simplifying the
integrand
Second part
correct
OR Integral split into two separate integrals
Using limits.
M1 Dependendent
on M mark for
integration by
parts
Cao
Let
M1
Using
M1dep
integration by
parts with u =
ln x,
or u =
ln x,
(k2 ln k – k2) – (k ln 1 – k) = k2 ln k – k2 + k
clearly
And
A1
argued
A1
Substituition of
limits seen in at
A1 least one
integral.
Dependendent
on M mark for
integration by
parts
Both integrals
correct at this
stage Allow
without limits
Both integrals
fully correct
Allow without
limits
Cao
Examiner’s Comments
integration by .
parts with It
AfL In an unstructured
question like this one, do not give up or leave it
blank because you do not know how to
calculate the limits. Find the indefinite integral
to make sure of 4 out of 8 marks. Using
Total 8
For use of
M1 (AO 3.1a) product rule
A1 (AO 1.1)
For correct
(unsimplified)
derivative
M1 (AO 1.1a)
e−2x(−10x + 5) = 0
For equating
derivative to
A1 (AO 1.1) zero and
attempting
to solve for x
M1 (AO 3.1a)
oe
9
Limits 0 and
M1 (AO 1.1a)
(their)
A1 (AO 1.1) must be
seen at
some stage
A1 (AO 1.1)
for this
mark to be
awarded
A1 (AO 1.1)
[9]
For
Integration
completed
correctly
Total 9
ln a = b B1 (AO 1.1)
A1(AO 1.1)
M1(AO 2.1)
10 a
=a−1
A1(AO 1.1)
or a × b −
M1(AO 3.1a)
their
Area A: A1(AO 1.1)
alna − a + 1
[7]
alna − 2a + 2 = 0
M1 (AO 2.1)
Evaluation of their f(4.921554 − δ) and their f(4.921554 + δ)
δ ≤0.000 000
b A1(AO 2.2a)
eg − 0.000000079882 and 0.000000513742 seen to 2 or more sf plus correct conclusion: sign 5
change, so Heidi is correct
[2]
Total 9