A_Novel_Method_of_Discrete-Time_Signal_Amplification_Using_NEMS_Devices
A_Novel_Method_of_Discrete-Time_Signal_Amplification_Using_NEMS_Devices
0018-9383 © 2018 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission.
See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
Authorized licensed use limited to: INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY BOMBAY. Downloaded on July 02,2022 at 16:52:26 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
5112 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES, VOL. 65, NO. 11, NOVEMBER 2018
TABLE I
E XTRACTED PARAMETERS OF NEMS C APACITIVE S WITCH
Authorized licensed use limited to: INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY BOMBAY. Downloaded on July 02,2022 at 16:52:26 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
SANKAR et al.: NOVEL METHOD OF D-T SIGNAL AMPLIFICATION USING NEMS DEVICES 5113
TABLE II
E XTRACTED PARAMETERS OF NEMS O HMIC S WITCH
Fig. 8. Amplifier circuit in (a) beginning of hold and (b) middle of hold
phase.
Authorized licensed use limited to: INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY BOMBAY. Downloaded on July 02,2022 at 16:52:26 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
5114 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES, VOL. 65, NO. 11, NOVEMBER 2018
Fig. 12. (a) Sampled and amplified sinusoidal input (fIN = 5 kHz, fCLK =
100 kHz) using differential NEMS D-T amplifier. (b) Transient waveforms
depicting the loaded gain in the modified NEMS D-T amplifier (V+ in =
0.2 V, VBIAS = 4 V).
Fig. 11. Transient simulation waveforms of the NEMS D-T amplifier using Fig. 13. (a) Parasitic capacitances in the NEMS ohmic switch. (b) Mod-
Cadence Spectre for V+ in = 0.2 V, VBIAS = 4 V, and fCLK = 100 kHz.
ified NEMS D-T amplifier.
Authorized licensed use limited to: INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY BOMBAY. Downloaded on July 02,2022 at 16:52:26 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
SANKAR et al.: NOVEL METHOD OF D-T SIGNAL AMPLIFICATION USING NEMS DEVICES 5115
B. Voltage Range
The input and output voltage swings needed in the amplifier
determine the condition on the pull-in (VPI,C ) and the pull-
out voltages (VPO,C ) of the NEMS capacitive switch. The
following equations describe the conditions:
VBIAS ≥ VPI,C + Vin,max (6)
Fig. 14. (a) Variation of gain with respect to the input signal amplitude.
(b) Ratio of VPO,C /VPI,C versus the amplifier gain. Vout,max < VPO,C . (7)
The condition given in (6) ensures that both the NEMS
In (2), CGS(D),ON and CGS(D),OFF represent the parasitic capacitive switches are pulled in during the sampling phase.
capacitance between the gate and the source/drain terminal The condition given in (7) ensures that the NEMS capacitive
in the NEMS ohmic switch during ON -state and OFF-state, switches are pulled out during the hold phase. The expression
respectively. They load the capacitances C A and C B during of VPI,C and VPO,C for the NEMS capacitive switch is given
both the phases. The values of CGS(D),ON and CGS(D) , OFF are in the following equation [11]:
1 fF and 0.13 fF, respectively. Hence, the loaded gain for the 3
8K td
modified NEMS D-T amplifier is equal to 4.77. Fig. 12(b) eff go + εd 2K eff go td2
shows the waveforms of the modified NEMS D-T amplifier VPI,C = ; VPO,C = (8)
27εo A εd2 εo A
for a 0.2-V input dc signal, confirming the reduction in loaded
gain. The NEMS D-T amplifier could also be co-designed by where K eff is the effective spring constant of the beam and
including the parasitic capacitances of the ohmic switch for “A” is the overlap area that is given by W × L B [Fig. 2(a)].
obtaining the gain. Based on (4) and (8), the expressions for VPI,C and VPO,C are
The variation of gain (denoted in blue color) with the input given by the following equations:
amplitude for the modified NEMS D-T amplifier [Fig. 13(b)]
is shown in Fig. 14(a). The gain reduces by 5.4% at an input A V td 3 K eff
amplitude of 325 mV. If the differential gain is considered, VPI,C = α1 (9)
εd A
then the effect of non-linearity in the gain is considerably
reduced due to the cancelation of even order non-linear terms. K
t 3 eff
This is evident in the plot of gain (denoted in black color) in
VPO,C = α2 A V −1
d
. (10)
Fig. 14(a) for the differential implementation of the modified εd A
NEMS D-T amplifier, where the gain reduces only by 2%
(at 325-mV input). In (9) and (10), α1 and α2 are given by (8/27εo )1/2
and (2/εo )1/2 , respectively. For the NEMS capacitive switch
VI. D ESIGN C ONSIDERATIONS FOR considered in this paper, the term (K eff /A) is given in (11),
NEMS D-T A MPLIFIER where “E” is Young’s Modulus of the beam material. The
A. Voltage Gain term (K eff /A) is dependent on the structure of the switch and
can be controlled independently without affecting the gain.
The gain of the amplifier depends on the value of C ON and Based on the maximum output voltage swing needed, (K eff /A)
C OFF of the NEMS capacitive switch and is given in (3). The can be used to set the VPO,C . The terms VPI,C and VPO,C are
theoretical voltage gain (A V ) is defined in (4). interrelated with each other. This is quantified in (12), which
εo εd A εo A provides the ratio of VPO,C /VPI,C as a function of the amplifier
C ON = ; C OFF = (3)
td go + εtdd gain. Hence, when the term (K eff /A) is used to set VPO,C ,
C ON go εd VPI,C is also fixed.
AV = =1+ . (4)
C OFF td K eff 32E t 3
≈ (11)
The switch parameters go , t D , and ε D (Fig. 3) determine the A L B L3
gain. In reality, the presence of parasitic fringe capacitances
VPO,C α2 AV − 1
and the curvature of the beam causes the gain to reduce from = (12)
VPI,C α1 A3V
the theoretical value. This effect is presented by including
parameter γ (γ < 1) in the description for the practical gain As the gain increases, the ratio of VPO,C /VPI,C falls due
as given in (5). For the NEMS capacitive switch considered to the increment in the hysteresis window of the NEMS
in this paper, the theoretical gain possible is 10.36, but capacitive switch [Fig. 14(b)]. Hence, it is desirable to have
Authorized licensed use limited to: INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY BOMBAY. Downloaded on July 02,2022 at 16:52:26 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
5116 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES, VOL. 65, NO. 11, NOVEMBER 2018
TABLE III
P ERFORMANCE C OMPARISON OF THE NEMS D-T A MPLIFIER
a capacitive switch with low hysteresis so as to increase the of the modified NEMS D-T amplifier, the power dissipated in
usable range of the amplifier. Finally, the bias voltage (VBIAS ) the amplifier (PAmp ) and the power dissipated in driving the
required for the amplifier is chosen to satisfy the condition switches (Psw ) are given by (14) and (15), respectively.
required for the pull in, based on maximum Vin as given 2
PAmp = 2 × (20C ON + 4CGS(D),ON + 4CGS(D),OFF )VBIAS f CLK
in (6). The NEMS switches in this paper are chosen to keep
the structure simple enough. The design procedure discussed (14)
2
in this section can be extended to different structures of the Psw = 2 × (6CPAR,ON + 3CGB,ON )VGB f CLK . (15)
switch as well.
In (14), CPAR,ON (= CGS,ON + CGD,ON + CGB,ON ) is the
total parasitic capacitance looking into the gate terminal of
C. Scaling and Process Integration
the NEMS ohmic switch in the ON-state. Some amount of
If all the geometrical parameters of the NEMS capacitive power (Pclk ) is dissipated in the nonoverlap clock generator
switch in the proposed D-T amplifier are scaled by a factor “,” circuit. Hence, the total power dissipation is given by PAmp +
then the voltage gain remains unchanged and the switch Psw + Pclk . For the differential implementation of the modified
parameters VPI,C , VPO,C , C ON , C OFF , and TMech are linearly NEMS D-T amplifier, the total power consumption is 0.6 μW.
scaled by “” as given in the following equation:
f n = × f n . (13) E. Performance Comparison
Table III compares the performance of NEMS D-T amplifier
In (13), the terms f n and f n represent the parameters before
with the op-amp and metal-oxide-semiconductor capacitor-
and after scaling, respectively. The scaling of the NEMS
based D-T amplifier. As we see from the table, the proposed
ohmic switch follows a similar trend. The downscaling of
NEMS D-T amplifier handles a maximum differential input
the vertical dimensions (beam and airgap) of the switch poses
signal of 0.65 V and consumes only 0.6 μW of power for a
fabrication challenges. However, the tremendous progress in
sampling frequency of 100 kHz.
the NEMS fabrication has resulted in low voltages, low
footprint [12], [13] along with considerable improvement in
VII. C ONCLUSION
the reliability of scaled switches [14], [15]. NEMS switches of
the proposed D-T amplifier can be integrated with the CMOS In this paper, we have presented a technique of realizing
die on the same substrate using wire bonds or at the package a D-T signal amplification using NEMS devices and sub-
level. Recent approaches of the integration include the direct sequently verified the same using the calibrated verilog-A
realization of NEMS structures at the CMOS back-end-of-line models. The presented NEMS D-T amplifier opens up a new
level [16] and 3-D ICs [17]. avenue for utilizing NEMS switches in analog applications,
which further motivates the development of low voltage and
low-footprint devices. In the Internet of Things (IoT) sensor
D. Power Dissipation nodes, the output signal of the sensor is typically of low
The power dissipation in the NEMS D-T-amplifier is amplitude and bandwidth. This paper shows the proposed
entirely dynamic in nature. For a differential implementation NEMS D-T amplifier can receive signals as low as 1 mV
Authorized licensed use limited to: INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY BOMBAY. Downloaded on July 02,2022 at 16:52:26 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
SANKAR et al.: NOVEL METHOD OF D-T SIGNAL AMPLIFICATION USING NEMS DEVICES 5117
and acts as a front-end sample and hold amplifier preceding [10] K. van Caekenberghe, “Modeling RF MEMS devices,” IEEE Microw.
the ADC. As a result, the overall power consumption is Mag., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 83–110, Jan./Feb. 2012, doi: 10.1109/MMM.
2011.2173984.
reduced and the battery life of IoT sensor nodes is enhanced. [11] G. M. Rebeiz, RF MEMS: Theory, Design and Technology. New York,
NY, USA: Wiley, 2003.
[12] C. Qian, A. Peschot, B. Osoba, Z. A. Ye, and T.-J. K. Liu,
R EFERENCES “Sub-100 mV computing with electro-mechanical relays,” IEEE Trans.
[1] M. Spencer et al., “Demonstration of integrated micro-electro- Electron Devices, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 1323–1329, Mar. 2017,
mechanical relay circuits for VLSI applications,” IEEE J. Solid-State doi: 10.1109/TED.2017.2657554.
Circuits, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 308–320, Jan. 2011, doi: 10.1109/JSSC.2010. [13] J. O. Lee et al., “A sub-1-volt nanoelectromechanical switching device,”
2074370. Nature Nanotechnol., vol. 8, pp. 36–40, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.1038/
[2] D. Lee et al., “Combinational logic design using six-terminal NEM nnano.2012.208.
relays,” IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Design Integr. Circuits Syst., [14] M. Ramezani, S. Severi, A. Moussa, H. Osman, H. A. C. Tilmans,
vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 653–666, May 2013, doi: 10.1109/TCAD.2012. and K. De Meyer, “Contact reliability improvement of a poly-SiGe
2232707. based nano-relay with titanium nitride coating,” in Proc. 18th IEEE
[3] R. Venkatasubramanian, S. K. Manohar, and P. T. Balsara, “NEM relay- Transducers, Jun. 2015, pp. 576–579, doi: 10.1109/TRANSDUCERS.
based sequential logic circuits for low-power design,” IEEE Trans. Nan- 2015.7180989.
otechnol., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 386–398, May 2013, doi: 10.1109/TNANO. [15] Y. Chen, R. Nathanael, J. Jeon, J. Yaung, L. Hutin, and T.-J. K. Liu,
2013.2252923. “Characterization of contact resistance stability in MEM relays with
[4] S. Meninger, J. O. Mur-Miranda, R. Amirtharajah, A. Chandrakasan, tungsten electrodes,” J. Microelectromech. Syst., vol. 21, no. 3,
and J. H. Lang, “Vibration-to-electric energy conversion,” IEEE Trans. pp. 511–513, 2012, doi: 10.1109/JMEMS.2012.2186282.
Very Large Scale Integr. (VLSI) Syst., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 64–76, Feb. 2001, [16] W. Y. Choi and Y. J. Kim, “Three-dimensional integration of com-
doi: 10.1109/92.920820. plementary metal-oxide-semiconductor-nanoelectromechanical hybrid
[5] J. P. Raskin, A. R. Brown, B. Khuri-Yakub, and G. M. Rebeiz, “A novel reconfigurable circuits,” IEEE Electron Device Lett., vol. 36, no. 9,
parametric-effect MEMS amplifier,” J. Microelectromech. Syst., vol. 9, pp. 887–889, Sep. 2015, doi: 10.1109/LED.2015.2455556.
no. 4, pp. 528–537, Dec. 2000, doi: 10.1109/84.896775. [17] A. C. Fischer et al., “Integrating MEMS and ICs,” Microsyst. Nanoeng.,
[6] K. Akarvardar and H.-S. P. Wong, “Analog nanoelectromechanical relay vol. 1, Mar. 2015, Art. no. 15005, doi: 10.1038/micronano.2015.5.
with tunable transconductance,” IEEE Electron Device Lett., vol. 30, [18] J. Hu, N. Dolev, and B. Murmann, “A 9.4-bit, 50-MS/s, 1.44-mW
no. 11, pp. 1143–1145, Nov. 2009, doi: 10.1109/LED.2009.2030751. pipelined ADC using dynamic source follower residue amplification,”
[7] B. Razavi, Design of Analog CMOS Integrated Circuits. New York, NY, IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 1057–1066, Apr. 2009,
USA: McGraw-Hill, 2002. doi: 10.1109/JSSC.2009.2014705.
[8] S. Ranganathan and Y. Tsividis, “Discrete-time parametric amplification
based on a three-terminal MOS varactor: Analysis and experimental
results,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 2087–2093,
Dec. 2003, doi: 10.1109/JSSC.2003.819162.
[9] MEMS FEM CAD Tool. Accessed: Oct. 1, 2017. [Online]. Available: Authors’ photographs and biographies not available at the time of
www.coventor.com/mems-solutions/products/coventorware/ publication.
Authorized licensed use limited to: INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY BOMBAY. Downloaded on July 02,2022 at 16:52:26 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.