0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views

01

This document outlines the standard operating procedure for conducting investigations and root cause analyses of non-conformances at a specified company location. It details the responsibilities of various personnel involved in the investigation process, defines key terms, and provides a structured approach for identifying and addressing issues related to product quality, efficacy, and safety. The document also includes guidelines for preparing investigation reports and implementing corrective and preventive actions (CAPA).

Uploaded by

qadgm.spi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views

01

This document outlines the standard operating procedure for conducting investigations and root cause analyses of non-conformances at a specified company location. It details the responsibilities of various personnel involved in the investigation process, defines key terms, and provides a structured approach for identifying and addressing issues related to product quality, efficacy, and safety. The document also includes guidelines for preparing investigation reports and implementing corrective and preventive actions (CAPA).

Uploaded by

qadgm.spi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 18

 OBJECTIVE:

To lay down a procedure for standard operating procedure for investigation.

 SCOPE:

This procedure shall be applicable for performing the investigation and root cause
analysis for non conformances observed at {Company Name}{Company Location}.

 RESPONSIBILITY:

 Personnel of concerned department, who is encountered with incident /


deviation / complaint that are related to the quality, efficacy and safety of
product, shall be responsible to report the same and take part in the
investigation.

 Initiator Department Head & designated person in QA shall nominate the


investigation team for carrying out the investigation to detect the root cause /
probable root cause of the non conformance and preparation of investigation
report.

 Initiator Department Head shall be responsible for the review of investigation


of the root cause analysis for non conformances, review of reports and CAPA.

 QA Head shall be responsible for review and approval of investigation report


and approving the CAPA thereafter.

 Plant Head/ GM Technical shall be responsible to provide the resources and


review of investigation.

 ACCOUNTABILITY:

QA Head shall be accountable for implementation of SOP.

 PROCEDURE:

 DEFINITIONS :

 Non conformances: The non fulfillment of a specified requirement. Examples


of non conformances are incidents, deviation, Product complaints, audit
observations (Internal & External), Product Recall.
 Cause Analysis: This action requires the question “Why did it go wrong?” to
be asked instead of just “What has gone wrong?”
 Risk Assessment: A systematic process of organizing information to support
a risk decision to be made within a risk management process. It consists of
the identification of hazards, analysis and evaluation of risks associated with
exposure to those hazards.
 Root Cause: This section shall be used to find out the assignable cause for
the situation arised.
 Impact Analysis: This section shall be used to list the impact of the
preventive actions proposed.

 Investigation shall be performed for non conformances like deviation, incident,


complaints, product recall, and audit observations etc:
 OOS/OOT investigation shall be performed as per SOP No. QA/022 and
QA/023 respectively and in certain specified/identified cases corresponding
SOP shall be applicable following recommendation by the QA Head or his
designee.
 Initiator Department Head & designated person in QA shall nominate the
investigation team for carrying the investigation to detect the root cause of the
non conformance. Investigation team shall be cross functional on basis of
nature of problem identified.
 For an effective investigation of non conformances following steps shall be
followed:
 The problem shall be defined for which the investigation is required.
 Collect all the information / evidence related to the problem. Wherever
applicable use the check list for investigation as per Annexure-I.
 The investigation process shall follow a clearly defined procedure to identify
the true cause associated with the problem.
 If we are to evaluate the many so-called root cause analysis method.
 Appropriate tool like is- Is Not Diagram, Why –Why Analysis, Fish–Bone
analysis (Ishikawa Diagram), Brain Storming to be used for investigation as
applicable (Refer Appendix-I).
 Is /Is Not Diagram: Is – Is not diagram includes any tool that shows the four
steps of the comparative analysis process. An example of an Is-Is Not
Diagram is the spec and work sheet. This tool takes the four steps and
structures them into the workable format for capturing data and information for
a problem/Event. (Refer appendix-1).
 Why- Why Analysis – One of many brainstorming method also known as the
“five Whys” method. This is the most simplest root cause analysis process
and involves repeatedly asking “why” at least five times or until you can no
longer answer the question .Five is an arbitrary figure .The theory is that after
asking “Why” five times we shall probably arrive at root cause .The root
cause shall identified when asking “why” does not provide any more useful
information .This method produces a linear set of casual relationships and
uses the experience of the problem owner to determine the root cause and
corresponding solution. (Refer appendix-1).
 Fish Bone Diagram (Cause and Effect Diagram): (Refer appendix-1)
 Man: This category takes in to consideration the human element that may
affect the problem. It considers the people that touch the process.
 If the person s involved in activity is not trained.
 If new person involved in activity.
 If person is competent for the activity.
 Relevant experience of the concern personnel.
 Material: This category takes into the consideration the substances out of
which the product can be made. It considers all material that touches the
process.
 If material is not appropriate.
 Any change in vendor
 Vendor is not qualified
 Change in specification / grade or material

Click the link for download word file copy of this


document: https://pharmaguidehub.com/product/sop-for-investigation/

 Machine: This category takes in to the consideration the equipment used that
may affect the problem. It considers the equipment that touches the product,
process and system.
 If periodic Preventive maintenance of machine not done.
 If any breakdown has occurred during process.
 If machine Qualification/ Requalification done.
 If instrument /Equipment showing actual reading.
 If machine setting done between the activity.
 Method: This category takes in to the consideration the method/ process that
may affect the problem
 If batch processed as per written instructions mentioned in Batch
Manufacturing record.
 If any change in machine process and product parameter.
 Measurement: This category takes in to the consideration measurement that
may affect the problem. Measurement considers the measurements used for
the product, process system.
 Calibration of equipment/Instruments.
 Mother Nature / Environment: This category takes in to the consideration
the Environmental factors that may affect the problem. It considers the
environmental factor that touches the process.
 Fish Bone Diagram (Cause and Effect Diagram):
Investigate with sufficient depth so as to identify the root cause / probable root
cause. The examples of possible causes are given below:

 Personnel not adequately trained


 Procedures inadequate

 Personnel trained but did not follow standard operating procedure (trained but
forgot, working too fast, took shortcuts and used wrong procedures)

 Equipment used not qualified

 Area cleaning / equipments cleaning not adequate

 Error in environmental monitoring

 Error in Preventive Maintenance

 Error in calibration

Investigation shall be done by review of concerned documents i.e. BMR, BPR,


logbooks, relevant SOP’s, analytical data, raw data, stability data, preventive and
breakdown maintenance data, calibration records, validation reports and any other
relevant documents shall be reviewed to collect maximum possible and relevant
data.

If required necessary interrogation shall be done up to doer/performer level to find


out the route cause.

After going through all relevant documents and data collected through the
discussions with relevant personnel, Investigation team will suggest the next step
such as resampling, retesting, extra testing and any other measure required
(wherever applicable) to complete the investigation. However, any Resampling,
retesting or extra testing required shall be approved by Head QA.

Based upon investigation outcome, team shall identify the root cause of the non
conformance.

After identification of root cause of the problem Impact/Risk assessment shall be


performed, wherever applicable.

Click the link for download word file copy of this


document: https://pharmaguidehub.com/product/sop-for-investigation/
Designated person from QA shall confirm the authenticity and completeness of the
data and analyze the data to identify potential product and quality problems for which
corrective action and preventive actions are required.

CAPA shall be decided based on scientific and logical justifications to prevent future
reoccurrence of the similar problem.

Investigation report shall be prepared by following the template mentioned


in Appendix-II.

After completion of investigation of all possible / probable causes, the team /


designee shall prepare a final Investigation report within 30 days from date of
initiation of investigation.

CAPA shall be handled as a part of source documents, wherever applicable.

Investigation report should be completed within 30 working days.

If the investigation followed by report preparation is not completed within 30 working


days, then extension can be granted for maximum 30 days. Maximum 2 extensions
can be taken as per Annexure-II.

The approved comprehensive Investigation report shall be enclosed to its reference


source documents.

 REFERENCES:

Not Applicable.

 ANNEXURES:

ANNEXURE No. TITLE OF ANNEXURE/APPENDIX FORMAT No.


Annexure-I Check List for Investigation QA-019/F01-00
Annexure-II Extension Request for Investigation QA-019/F02-00
Appendix-I Investigation Flow Chart NA
Appendix-II Template for Investigation Report NA
Appendix-III Investigation Tools NA

Click the link for download word file copy of this


document: https://pharmaguidehub.com/product/sop-for-investigation/
DISTRIBUTION:

Controlled Copy No. 01 : Head Quality Assurance


Controlled Copy No. 02 : Head Quality Control
Controlled Copy No. 03 : Head Production
Controlled Copy No. 04 : Head Engineering
Controlled Copy No. 05 : Head Warehouse
Controlled Copy No. 06 : Head Human Resources
Master Copy : Quality Assurance Department

ABBREVIATIONS:

QA : Quality Assurance
SOP : Standard Operating Procedure
cGMP : Current Good Manufacturing Practices
OOS : Out of specification
CAPA : Corrective actions & preventive actions
OOT : Out of Trend
NA : Not Applicable

REVISION HISTORY:

CHANGE HISTORY LOG

Revision No. Details of Changes Reason for Change Effective Date


00 New SOP Not Applicable To be enter manual

ANNEXURE-I
Click the link for download word file copy of this
document: https://pharmaguidehub.com/product/sop-for-investigation/
ANNEXURE II
APPENDIX – I
APPENDIX -II
Click the link for download word file copy of this
document: https://pharmaguidehub.com/product/sop-for-investigation/

APPENDIX -III

You might also like