TQM UPDATED NOTES_removed (5)
TQM UPDATED NOTES_removed (5)
Basic Approach
TQM requires six basic concepts:
1. A committed and involved management to provide long-term top-to-bottom organizational support.
2. An unwavering focus on the customer, both internally and externally.
3. Effective involvement and utilization of the entire work force.
4. Continuous improvement of the business and production process.
5. Treating suppliers as partners.
6. Establish performance measures for the processes.
1. Management must participate in the quality program. A quality council must be established to develop
a clear vision, set long-term goals, and direct the program. Quality goals are included in the business
plan. An annual quality improvement program is established and involves input from the entire work
force. Managers participate on quality improvement teams and also act as coaches to other teams.
2. The key to an effective TQM program is its focus on the customer. An excellent place to start is by
satisfying internal customers. We must listen to the “voice of the customer” and emphasize design
quality and defect prevention. Do it right the first time and every time, for customer satisfaction is the
most important consideration.
3. TQM is an organization-wide challenge that is everyone’s responsibility. All personnel must be
trained in TQM, statistical process control (SPC), and other appropriate quality improvement skills so
they can effectively participate on project teams. Including internal customers and, for that matter,
internal suppliers on project teams is an excellent approach.
4. There must be a continual striving to improve all business and production processes. Quality
improvement projects, such as on-time delivery, order entry efficiency, billing error rate, customer
satisfaction, cycle time, scrap reduction, and supplier management, are good places to begin.
5. On the average 40% of the sales dollar is purchased product or service; therefore, the supplier quality
must be outstanding. A partnering relationship rather than an adversarial one must be developed. Both
parties have as much to gain or lose based on the success or failure of the product or service. The focus
should be on quality and life-cycle costs rather than price. Suppliers should be few in number so that
true partnering can occur.
6. Performance measures such as uptime, percent nonconforming, absenteeism, and customer
satisfaction should be determined for each functional area. These measures should be posted for
everyone to see. Quantitative data are necessary to measure the continuous quality improvement
activity.
Taguchi
Genichi Taguchi, PhD, developed his loss function concept that combines cost, target, and variation
into one metric. Because the loss function is reactive, he developed the signal to noise ratio as a
proactive equivalent. The cornerstone of Taguchi’s philosophy is the robust design of parameters and
tolerances. It is built on the simplification and use of traditional design of experiments.
TQM Framework
Figure 1 shows the framework for the TQM system. It begins with the knowledge provided by gurus of
quality: Shewhart, Deming, Juran, Feigenbaum, Ishikawa, Crosby, and Taguchi. As the figure shows,
they contributed to the development of principles and practices and/or the tools and techniques. Some
of these tools and techniques are used in the product and/or service realization activity. Feedback from
internal/external customers or interested parties provides information to continually improve the
organization’s system, product and/or service.
Fig 1
Awareness
An organization will not begin the transformation to TQM until it is aware that the quality of the product
or service must be improved. Awareness comes about when an organization loses market share or
realizes that quality and productivity go hand-in-hand.
Automation and other productivity enhancements might not help a corporation if it is unable to
market its product or service because the quality is poor.
Until recently, corporations have not recognized the importance of quality. However, a new
attitude has emerged—quality first among the equals of cost and service. The customer wants
value. Quality and productivity are not mutually exclusive.
Improvements in quality can lead directly to increased productivity and other benefits. As seen
in the table, the improved quality results in a 5.6% improvement in productivity, capacity, and
profit.
Many quality improvement projects are achieved with the same work force, same overhead,
and no investment in new equipment. Recent evidence shows that more and more corporations
are recognizing the importance and necessity of quality improvement if they are to survive
domestic and world-wide competition.
Quality improvement is not limited to the conformance of the product or service to
specifications; it also involves the inherent quality in the design of the system. The prevention
of product, service, and process problems is a more desirable objective than taking corrective
action after the product is manufactured or a service rendered.
Defining Quality
It is defined as the degree to which a set of inherent characteristics fulfills requirements. Degree
means that quality can be used with adjectives such as poor, good, and excellent. Inherent is defined
as existing in something, especially as a permanent characteristic. Characteristics can be
quantitative or qualitative. Requirement is a need or expectation that is stated; generally implied by
the organization, its customers, and other interested parties; or obligatory.
The Dimensions of Quality
Performance
Does the product or service do what it is supposed to do, within its defined tolerances? Performance
is often a source of contention between customers and suppliers, particularly when deliverables are
not adequately defined within specifications. The performance of a product often influences the
profitability or reputation of the end-user. As such, many contracts or specifications include
damages related to inadequate performance.
Features
Does the product or services possess all of the features specified, or required for its intended
purpose? While this dimension may seem obvious, performance specifications rarely define the
features required in a product. Thus, it’s important that suppliers designing products or services
from performance specifications are familiar with their intended uses, and maintain close
relationships with the end-users.
Reliability
Will the product consistently perform within specifications? Reliability may be closely related to
performance. For instance, a product specification may define parameters for up-time or acceptable
failure rates. Reliability is a major contributor to brand or company image and is considered a
fundamental dimension of quality by most end-users.
Conformance
Does the product or service conform to the specification? If it’s developed based on a performance
specification, does it perform as specified? If it’s developed based on a design specification, does
it possess all of the features defined?
Durability
How long will the product perform or last, and under what conditions? Durability is closely related
to warranty. Requirements for product durability are often included within procurement contracts
and specifications. For instance, fighter aircraft procured to operate from aircraft carriers include
design criteria intended to improve their durability in the demanding naval environment.
Serviceability
Is the product relatively easy to maintain and repair? As end users become more focused on the
Total Cost of Ownership than simple procurement costs, serviceability (as well as reliability) is
becoming an increasingly important dimension of quality and criteria for product selection.
Aesthetics
The way a product looks is important to end-users. The aesthetic properties of a product contribute
to a company’s or brand’s identity. Faults or defects in a product that diminish its aesthetic
properties, even those that do not reduce or alter other dimensions of quality, are often causes for
rejection.
Perception
Perception is reality. The product or service may possess adequate or even superior dimensions of
quality but still fall victim to negative customer or public perceptions.
1930s
Walter Shewhart developed the methods for statistical analysis and control of quality.
1950s
W. Edwards Deming taught methods for statistical analysis and control of quality to Japanese
engineers and executives. This can be considered the origin of TQM.
Joseph M. Juran taught the concepts of controlling quality and managerial breakthrough.
Armand V. Feigenbaum’s book Total Quality Control, a forerunner for the present understanding
of TQM, was published.
Philip B. Crosby’s promotion of zero defects paved the way for quality improvement in many
companies.
1968
The Japanese named their approach to total quality "companywide quality control." It is around this
time that the term quality management systems arises.
Kaoru Ishikawa’s synthesis of the philosophy contributed to Japan’s ascendancy as a quality leader.
OBSTACLES OF TQM
Once an organization embarks on TQM, there will be obstacles to its successful implementation.