STR - RPT - Roy Shaw - 33 Yorkshire - Gardens - London - N18 2LD - Uk
Uploaded by
iamtaimoor2STR - RPT - Roy Shaw - 33 Yorkshire - Gardens - London - N18 2LD - Uk
Uploaded by
iamtaimoor2S STRUCTURAL REPORT
CLIENT: Roy Shaw
ADDRESS: 33 YORKSHIRE GARDENS, LONDON N18 2LD, UK
PREPARED BY:
PLANSING
SW9 0RF-UK
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Disclaimer:
This document has been prepared in accordance with the PLANSING appointment scope
established with our esteemed client and is strictly governed by the terms outlined in that
appointment. It is crucial to recognize the confiden al nature of this document, as it is
specifically intended for the exclusive use and reliance of PLANSING's client. It is important to
note that PLANSING bears no liability for any u liza on of this document by any party other
than its designated client, and such u liza on is solely permi ed for the explicitly stated
purposes outlined within the document, for which it was me culously prepared and
provided. It is of utmost importance to emphasize that without the prior wri en permission
of a Director of PLANSING, no individual other than the client is authorized to copy (in whole
or in part), u lize, or rely upon the contents of this document. Furthermore, it is crucial to
approach any advice, opinions, or recommenda ons contained within this document with
due diligence, ensuring that they are carefully assessed and relied upon solely within the
broader context of the document as a whole. Lastly, it is impera ve to understand that the
contents of this document are not intended to serve as a subs tute for professional legal,
business, or tax advice or opinion.
1
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Project Information
Design Codes – Eurocodes and their respective National Annexes:
BS EN 1990. Eurocode 0: ‘Basis of structural design’
BS EN 1991. Eurocode 1: ‘Actions on structures’
BS EN 1992. Eurocode 2: ‘Design of concrete structures’
BS EN 1993. Eurocode 3: ‘Design of steel structures’
BS EN 1995. Eurocode 5: ‘Design of timber structures’
BS EN 1996. Eurocode 6: ‘Design of masonry structures’
BS EN 1997. Eurocode 7: ‘Geotechnical Design’
2
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Notes:
Work to site dimensions only. Do not use any measurements shown in the calculations –
these are usually for design analysis and do not relate to physical dimensions on site.
Note also requirement of the Building Regulations outside the scope of these details
(e.g., Fire Protection, Dam proofing etc.: See Building Regulations Approved Documents
A to R, which must be referred to).
These details are to be read in conjunction with all accompanying structural drawings,
architectural drawings, specification notes etc.
Any discrepancies are to be reported immediately to PLANSING for clarification.
The contractor is responsible for all temporary works and for ensuring the stability of the
works in progress.
IMPORTANT
These details have been produced from drawings only. No structural investigations have
been
undertaken and all assumed loadbearing walls and existing foundations must be physically
exposed and checked on site prior to commencement. Similarly, note the strength of
existing walling, foundations and ground conditions that have been assumed for the purpose
of these calculations. Again, these are to be exposed and confirmed with the Building
Control Officer, prior to commencement of the works.
Works carried out on site prior to the relevant Planning and Building Regulation approval
being obtained for the Local Authority, is undertaken entirely at the Contractor and Client’s
own risk.
3
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
The works may fall under the Party Wall Act. Under this legislation the property owner
where the works are being carried out has certain responsibilities including notifying the
neighboring property owners and agreeing the terms of a Party Wall Award. Specialist
advice should be sought from a Party Wall Surveyor if the works fall under this act.
4
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
ITEMS
LOADING DETAILS
1. Steel Design
Steel Assembly
Beam-1 UC 203x203x46 (BS4-1) (S355)
Beam-2 UB 178x102x19 (BS4-1) (S355)
Beam-3 UC 152x152x23 (BS4-1) (S355)
2. CONNECTION DESIGN
CONNECTION-1 Splice Connection
CONNECTION -2 Shear Connection
CONNECTION-3 Beam to Column Connection
CONNECTION-4 Column to Foundation
CONNECTION-5 Shear Connection
5
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
3. PADSTONE DESIGN
PS-1 440 x 100 x 215
Provide three course of engineering bricks
4. MASONRY WALL DESIGN
Wall-1 (Cavity Wall)
5. FOUNDATION DESIGN
Strip Footing-1 (Eccentric)
Strip Footing-2 (Centric)
6. TIMBER DESIGN
Flat Roof Joist 47X150 @400 C/C (C-24)
Stud wall 47X150 @400 C/C (C-24)
Double Header (2)47X150 (C-24)
6
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
LOADING DETAILS
GENERAL LOADING FOR PITCHED
ROOF
Clay Tiles = 0.65 KN/m2
Felt and battens = 0.05 KN/m2
Timber rafters = 0.1 KN/m2
Insulations and other membranes = 0.1 KN/m2
Ceiling and services = 0.2 KN/m2
Total dead load on the slope = 1.10 KN/m2
Live Load = 0.6 KN/m2
GENERAL LOADING FOR FLAT
ROOF
Waterproofing, Insulation = 0.45 KN/m2
Timber joist = 0.2 KN/m2
Plyboard decking = 0.1 KN/m2
Ceiling and services = 0.2 KN/m2
Total dead load = 0.95 KN/m2
Live Load = 0.6 KN/m2
7
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
GENERAL LOADING FOR LOFT
FLOOR
Plywood Flooring = 0.15 KN/m2
Timber Joists = 0.2 KN/m2
Insulation = 0.05 KN/m2
Ceiling and services = 0.2 KN/m2
Partitions = 0.5 KN/m2
Total dead load = 1.10 KN/m2
Live Load = 1.5 KN/m2
GENERAL LOADING FOR FIRST
FLOOR
Plywood Flooring = 0.15 KN/m2
Timber Joists = 0.2 KN/m2
Insulation = 0.05 KN/m2
Ceiling and services = 0.2 KN/m2
Partitions = 0.5 KN/m2
Total dead load = 1.10 KN/m2
Live Load = 1.5 KN/m2
WALL LOAD
Brick Wall (102mm) = 2 KN/m2
8
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
1. Steel Design
Steel Assembly
Beam-1 UC 203x203x46 (BS4-1) (S355)
Beam-2 UB 178x102x19 (BS4-1) (S355)
Beam-3 UC 152x152x23 (BS4-1) (S355)
Whole Structure
9
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Whole Structure
10
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Whole Structure
Nodes
Node X Y Z
(m) (m) (m)
1 0.000 0.000 0.000
2 0.000 2.400 0.000
3 3.540 2.400 0.000
4 3.540 2.400 2.106
5 5.604 2.400 0.000
11
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
6 5.604 0.000 0.000
7 0.275 2.400 0.000
8 0.275 2.400 3.400
Beams
Beam Node A Node B Length Property
(m)
(degrees)
1 1 2 2.400 1 0
2 2 7 0.275 1 0
3 3 5 2.064 1 0
4 5 6 2.400 1 0
5 3 4 2.106 2 0
6 7 3 3.265 1 0
7 7 8 3.400 3 0
Section Properties
Prop Section Area (cm2) Iyy Izz J Material
4 4
(cm ) (cm ) (cm ) 4
1 UC203X203X46 58.700 1.55 E 4.57 E 22.154 STEEL
+3 +3
2 UB178X102X19 24.300 137.000 1.36 E 4.408 STEEL
+3
3 UC152X152X23 29.200 400.000 1.25 E 4.635 STEEL
+3
Materials
12
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Mat Name E Density
(kN/mm2) (kg/m3) (/°C)
1 STEEL 205.000 0.300 7.83 E 12 E -
+3 6
2 STAINLESSSTEEL 197.930 0.300 7.83 E 18 E -
+3 6
3 ALUMINUM 68.948 0.330 2.71 E 23 E -
+3 6
4 CONCRETE 21.718 0.170 2.4 E 10 E -
+3 6
Supports
Node X Y Z rX rY rZ
(kN/mm) (kN/mm) (kN/mm) (kN-m/deg) (kN-m/deg) (kN-m/deg)
1 Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed
4 Fixed Fixed Fixed - - -
6 Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed
8 Fixed Fixed Fixed - - -
Releases
There is no data of this type.
13
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Direction Factor Assigned Geometry
14
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Y -1.000 1-7 Primary Load
Cases
Number Name Type
1 DEAD LOAD Dead
2 LIVE LOAD Live
Combination Load Cases
Comb. Combination L/C Name Primary Primary L/C Name Factor
3 DEAD LOAD+LIVE LOAD 1 DEAD LOAD 1.00
2 LIVE LOAD 1.00
4 1.4DEAD LOAD+1.6LIVE LOAD 1 DEAD LOAD 1.00
2 LIVE LOAD 1.00
Load Generators
There is no data of this type.
1 DEAD LOAD : Beam Loads
Beam Type Direction Fa Da Fb Db Ecc.
(m) (m)
2 UNI kN/m GY -11.000 - - - -
3 UNI kN/m GY -11.000 - - - -
5 UNI kN/m GY -4.800 - - - -
6 UNI kN/m GY -11.000 - - - -
15
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
7 UNI kN/m GY -4.800 - - - -
1 DEAD LOAD : Selfweight
2 LIVE LOAD : Beam Loads
Beam Type Direction Fa Da Fb Db Ecc.
(m) (m)
2 UNI kN/m GY -1.000 - - - -
3 UNI kN/m GY -1.000 - - - -
5 UNI kN/m GY -1.000 - - - -
6 UNI kN/m GY -1.000 - - - -
16
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Whole Structure Displacements 1000mm:1m 3 DEAD LOAD+LIVE LOAD
Node Displacement Summary
Node L/C X Y Z Resultant rX rY rZ
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (rad) (rad) (rad)
17
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Max X 2 1:DEAD LOAD 0.046 -0.085 0.002 0.097 0.000 0.000 -0.002
Min X 5 3:DEAD LOAD+ -0.050 -0.079 -0.010 0.094 -0.000 0.000 0.002
Max Y 1 1:DEAD LOAD 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Min Y 3 3:DEAD LOAD+ -0.019 -6.907 -0.000 6.907 -0.002 0.000 0.002
Max Z 2 3:DEAD LOAD+ 0.035 -0.092 0.002 0.098 0.000 0.000 -0.002
Min Z 5 3:DEAD LOAD+ -0.050 -0.079 -0.010 0.094 -0.000 0.000 0.002
Max rX 7 1:DEAD LOAD 0.042 -0.835 0.001 0.837 0.003 0.000 -0.003
Min rX 4 3:DEAD LOAD+ 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 -0.004 0.000 0.002
Max rY 4 3:DEAD LOAD+ 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 -0.004 0.000 0.002
Min rY 8 1:DEAD LOAD 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 -0.003 -0.000 -0.003
Max rZ 5 3:DEAD LOAD+ -0.050 -0.079 -0.010 0.094 -0.000 0.000 0.002
Min rZ 7 3:DEAD LOAD+ 0.031 -0.908 0.001 0.909 0.003 0.000 -0.003
Max Rst 3 3:DEAD LOAD+ -0.019 -6.907 -0.000 6.907 -0.002 0.000 0.002
Beam Displacement Detail Summary
Displacements shown in italic indicate the presence of an offset
Beam L/C d X Y Z Resultant
(m) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
Max X 4 3:DEAD LOAD+ 0.960 0.711 -0.048 -0.003 0.713
Min X 1 3:DEAD LOAD+ 1.440 -0.716 -0.055 -0.011 0.719
Max Y 1 1:DEAD LOAD 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Min Y 6 3:DEAD LOAD+ 2.612 -0.009 -7.492 0.000 7.492
18
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Max Z 1 3:DEAD LOAD+ 2.400 0.035 -0.092 0.002 0.098
Min Z 1 1:DEAD LOAD 1.440 -0.649 -0.051 -0.011 0.651
Max Rst 6 3:DEAD LOAD+ 2.612 -0.009 -7.492 0.000 7.492
Beam End Displacement Summary
Displacements shown in italic indicate the presence of an offset
Beam Node L/C X Y Z Resultant
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
Max X 1 2 1:DEAD LOAD 0.046 -0.085 0.002 0.097
Min X 3 5 3:DEAD LOAD+ -0.050 -0.079 -0.010 0.094
Max Y 1 1 1:DEAD LOAD 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Min Y 3 3 3:DEAD LOAD+ -0.019 -6.907 0.000 6.907
Max Z 1 2 3:DEAD LOAD+ 0.035 -0.092 0.002 0.098
Min Z 3 5 3:DEAD LOAD+ -0.050 -0.079 -0.010 0.094
Max Rst 3 3 3:DEAD LOAD+ -0.019 -6.907 0.000 6.907
Beam End Force Summary
The signs of the forces at end B of each beam have been reversed. For example: this means that the Min Fx entry gives the largest tension
value for an beam.
Axial Shear Torsion Bending
Beam Node L/C Fx Fy Fz Mx My Mz
(kN) (kN) (kN) (kNm) (kNm) (kNm)
Max Fx 1 1 3:DEAD LOAD+ 46.455 -18.156 0.110 -0.000 -0.084 -13.183
Min Fx 5 3 3:DEAD LOAD+ -0.017 6.281 0.001 -0.000 -0.003 -0.049
Max Fy 2 2 3:DEAD LOAD+ 18.156 45.373 0.110 -0.179 -0.000 30.391
19
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Min Fy 3 5 3:DEAD LOAD+ 18.154 -39.285 0.006 -0.020 0.000 30.437
Max Fz 1 1 1:DEAD LOAD 43.284 -16.570 0.111 -0.000 -0.085 -11.985
Min Fz 6 7 3:DEAD LOAD+ 18.153 33.346 -0.011 0.028 0.020 18.384
Max Mx 6 7 3:DEAD LOAD+ 18.153 33.346 -0.011 0.028 0.020 18.384
Min Mx 2 2 1:DEAD LOAD 16.570 42.201 0.111 -0.180 -0.000 27.784
Max My 1 2 1:DEAD LOAD 42.201 -16.570 0.111 -0.000 0.180 27.784
Min My 1 1 1:DEAD LOAD 43.284 -16.570 0.111 -0.000 -0.085 -11.985
Max Mz 3 5 3:DEAD LOAD+ 18.154 -39.285 0.006 -0.020 0.000 30.437
Min Mz 3 3 3:DEAD LOAD+ 18.154 -13.587 0.006 -0.020 -0.012 -24.127
Beam Force Detail Summary
Sign convention as diagrams:- positive above line, negative below line except Fx where positive is compression. Distance d is given from
beam end A.
Axial Shear Torsion Bending
Beam L/C d Fx Fy Fz Mx My Mz
(m) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kNm) (kNm) (kNm)
Max Fx 1 3:DEAD LOAD+ 0.000 46.455 -18.156 0.110 -0.000 -0.084 -13.183
Min Fx 5 3:DEAD LOAD+ 0.000 -0.017 6.281 0.001 -0.000 -0.003 -0.049
Max Fy 2 3:DEAD LOAD+ 0.000 18.156 45.373 0.110 -0.179 -0.000 30.391
Min Fy 3 3:DEAD LOAD+ 2.064 18.154 -39.285 0.006 -0.020 0.000 30.437
Max Fz 1 1:DEAD LOAD 0.000 43.284 -16.570 0.111 -0.000 -0.085 -11.985
Min Fz 6 3:DEAD LOAD+ 0.000 18.153 33.346 -0.011 0.028 0.020 18.384
Max Mx 6 3:DEAD LOAD+ 0.000 18.153 33.346 -0.011 0.028 0.020 18.384
20
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Min Mx 2 1:DEAD LOAD 0.000 16.570 42.201 0.111 -0.180 -0.000 27.784
Max My 1 1:DEAD LOAD 2.400 42.201 -16.570 0.111 -0.000 0.180 27.784
Min My 1 1:DEAD LOAD 0.000 43.284 -16.570 0.111 -0.000 -0.085 -11.985
Max Mz 3 3:DEAD LOAD+ 2.064 18.154 -39.285 0.006 -0.020 0.000 30.437
Min Mz 6 3:DEAD LOAD+ 2.612 18.153 0.825 -0.011 0.028 -0.008 -26.133
21
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
22
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
23
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Whole Structure Beam Stress 5e+007mm:m 3 DEAD LOAD+LIVE LOAD
Reaction Summary
24
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Horizontal Vertical Horizontal Moment
Node L/C FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
(kN) (kN) (kN) (kNm) (kNm) (kNm)
Max FX 1 3:DEAD LOAD+ 18.156 46.455 0.110 0.084 -0.000 -13.183
Min FX 6 3:DEAD LOAD+ -18.154 40.368 -0.006 0.006 -0.000 13.133
Max FY 1 3:DEAD LOAD+ 18.156 46.455 0.110 0.084 -0.000 -13.183
Min FY 8 2:LIVE LOAD 0.001 0.000 -0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000
Max FZ 1 1:DEAD LOAD 16.570 43.284 0.111 0.085 -0.000 -11.985
Min FZ 8 3:DEAD LOAD+ -0.003 8.480 -0.120 0.000 0.000 0.000
Max MX 1 1:DEAD LOAD 16.570 43.284 0.111 0.085 -0.000 -11.985
Min MX 1 2:LIVE LOAD 1.585 3.171 -0.001 -0.001 -0.000 -1.198
Max MY 4 1:DEAD LOAD -0.000 5.273 0.015 0.000 0.000 0.000
Min MY 6 3:DEAD LOAD+ -18.154 40.368 -0.006 0.006 -0.000 13.133
Max MZ 6 3:DEAD LOAD+ -18.154 40.368 -0.006 0.006 -0.000 13.133
Min MZ 1 3:DEAD LOAD+ 18.156 46.455 0.110 0.084 -0.000 -13.183
25
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Base Pressure Summary
Node L/C FX FY FZ
(N/mm ) 2
(N/mm )2 (N/mm2)
26
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Max FX 1 1:DEAD LOAD 0.000 0.000 0.000
Min FX 1 1:DEAD LOAD 0.000 0.000 0.000
Max FY 1 1:DEAD LOAD 0.000 0.000 0.000
Min FY 1 1:DEAD LOAD 0.000 0.000 0.000
Max FZ 1 1:DEAD LOAD 0.000 0.000 0.000
Min FZ 1 1:DEAD LOAD 0.000 0.000 0.000
27
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
28
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Beam-1 UC 152x152x23 (BS4-1) (S355)
STEEL BEAM ANALYSIS & DESIGN (BS5950)
In accordance with BS5950-1:2000 incorporating Corrigendum No.1
TEDDS calculation version 3.0.07
29
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Support conditions
Support A Vertically restrained
Rotationally free
Support B Vertically restrained
Rotationally free
Support C Vertically restrained
Rotationally free
Applied loading
Beam loads Dead full UDL 0 kN/m
30
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Dead full UDL 0 kN/m
Dead self weight of beam 1
Span 1 loads Dead UDL 7 kN/m from 1187 mm to 2433 mm
Imposed UDL 1 kN/m from 1187 mm to 2433 mm
Span 2 loads Dead UDL 7 kN/m from 1194 mm to 2530 mm
Imposed UDL 1 kN/m from 1194 mm to 2530 mm
Load combinations
Load combination 1 Support A Dead 1.40
Imposed 1.60
Dead 1.40
Imposed 1.60
Support B Dead 1.40
Imposed 1.60
Dead 1.40
Imposed 1.60
Support C Dead 1.40
Imposed 1.60
Analysis results
Maximum moment; Mmax = 7.5 kNm; Mmin = -10.6 kNm
Maximum moment span 1; Ms1_max = 7 kNm; Ms1_min = -10.6 kNm
Maximum moment span 2; Ms2_max = 7.5 kNm; Ms2_min = -10.6 kNm
Maximum shear; Vmax = 11.2 kN; Vmin = -10.2 kN
Maximum shear span 1; Vs1_max = 5.2 kN; Vs1_min = -10.2 kN
Maximum shear span 2; Vs2_max = 11.2 kN; Vs2_min = -5.3 kN
Deflection; max = 2.2 mm; min = 0 mm
Deflection span 1; s1_max = 1.9 mm; s1_min = 0 mm
Deflection span 2; s2_max = 2.2 mm; s2_min = 0 mm
Maximum reaction at support A; RA_max = 5.2 kN; RA_min = 5.2 kN
Unfactored dead load reaction at support A; RA_Dead = 3.3 kN
Unfactored imposed load reaction at support A; RA_Imposed = 0.4 kN
Maximum reaction at support B; RB_max = 21.3 kN; RB_min = 21.3 kN
Unfactored dead load reaction at support B; RB_Dead = 13.2 kN
Unfactored imposed load reaction at support B; RB_Imposed = 1.7 kN
Maximum reaction at support C; RC_max = 5.3 kN; RC_min = 5.3 kN
31
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Unfactored dead load reaction at support C; RC_Dead = 3.3 kN
Unfactored imposed load reaction at support C; RC_Imposed = 0.4 kN
Section details
Section type; UC 152x152x23 (BS4-1)
Steel grade; S355
From table 9: Design strength py
Thickness of element; max(T, t) = 6.8 mm
Design strength; py = 355 N/mm2
Modulus of elasticity; E = 205000 N/mm2
Lateral restraint
Span 1 has lateral restraint at supports only
Span 2 has full lateral restraint
Effective length factors
Effective length factor in major axis; Kx = 1.00
Effective length factor in minor axis; Ky = 1.00
Effective length factor for lateral-torsional buckling; KLT.A = 1.00;
KLT.B = 1.00;
KLT.C = 1.00;
32
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Classification of cross sections - Section 3.5
= [275 N/mm2 / py] = 0.88
Internal compression parts - Table 11
Depth of section; d = 123.6 mm
d / t = 24.2 <= 80 ; Class 1 plastic
Outstand flanges - Table 11
Width of section; b = B / 2 = 76.1 mm
b / T = 12.7 <= 15 ; Class 3 semi-
compact
Section is class 3 semi-compact
Shear capacity - Section 4.2.3
Design shear force; Fv = max(abs(Vmax), abs(Vmin)) = 11.2 kN
d / t < 70
Web does not need to be checked for shear buckling
Shear area; Av = t D = 884 mm2
Design shear resistance; Pv = 0.6 py Av = 188.3 kN
PASS - Design shear resistance exceeds design shear force
Moment capacity at span 1 - Section 4.2.5
Design bending moment; M = max(abs(Ms1_max), abs(Ms1_min)) = 10.6 kNm
Effective plastic modulus - Section 3.5.6
Limiting value for class 2 compact flange; 2f = 10 = 8.801
Limiting value for class 3 semi-compact flange; 3f = 15 = 13.202
Limiting value for class 2 compact web; 2w = 100 = 88.014
Limiting value for class 3 semi-compact web; 3w = 120 = 105.617
Effective plastic modulus - cl.3.5.6.2
Seff = min(Zxx + (Sxx - Zxx) min([((3w / (d / t))2 - 1) / ((3w / 2w)2 - 1)], [(3f / (b / T) - 1) / (3f / 2f - 1)]), Sxx) =
170473 mm3
Moment capacity low shear - cl.4.2.5.2; Mc = min(py Seff, 1.5 py Zxx) = 60.5 kNm
Effective length for lateral-torsional buckling - Section 4.3.5
Effective length for lateral torsional buckling; LE = 1.0 Ls1 = 3796 mm
Slenderness ratio; = LE / ryy = 102.652
Equivalent slenderness - Section 4.3.6.7
Buckling parameter; u = 0.840
33
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Torsional index; x = 20.701
Slenderness factor; v = 1 / [1 + 0.05 ( / x)2]0.25 = 0.818
Ratio - cl.4.3.6.9; W = Seff / Sxx = 0.937
Equivalent slenderness - cl.4.3.6.7; LT = u v [W] = 68.262
Limiting slenderness - Annex B.2.2; L0 = 0.4 (2 E / py)0.5 = 30.198
LT > L0 - Allowance should be made for lateral-torsional buckling
Bending strength - Section 4.3.6.5
Robertson constant; LT = 7.0
Perry factor; LT = max(LT (LT - L0) / 1000, 0) = 0.266
Euler stress; pE = 2 E / LT2 = 434.2 N/mm2
LT = (py + (LT + 1) pE) / 2 = 452.4 N/mm2
Bending strength - Annex B.2.1; pb = pE py / (LT + (LT2 - pE py)0.5) = 227.6 N/mm2
Equivalent uniform moment factor - Section 4.3.6.6
Moment at quarter point of segment; M2 = 4.8 kNm
Moment at centre-line of segment; M3 = 6.5 kNm
Moment at three quarter point of segment; M4 = 1.1 kNm
Maximum moment in segment; Mabs = 10.6 kNm
Maximum moment governing buckling resistance; MLT = Mabs = 10.6 kNm
Equivalent uniform moment factor for lateral-torsional buckling;
mLT = max(0.2 + (0.15 M2 + 0.5 M3 + 0.15 M4) / Mabs, 0.44) = 0.590
Buckling resistance moment - Section 4.3.6.4
Buckling resistance moment; Mb = pb Seff = 38.8 kNm
Mb / mLT = 65.7 kNm
PASS - Moment capacity exceeds design bending moment
Check vertical deflection - Section 2.5.2
Consider deflection due to dead and imposed loads
Limiting deflection;; lim = Ls2 / 250 = 15.196 mm
Maximum deflection span 2; = max(abs(max), abs(min)) = 2.16 mm
PASS - Maximum deflection does not exceed deflection limit
34
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Beam-2 UB 178x102x19 (BS4-1) (S355)
STEEL BEAM ANALYSIS & DESIGN (BS5950)
In accordance with BS5950-1:2000 incorporating Corrigendum No.1
TEDDS calculation version 3.0.07
35
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Support conditions
Support A Vertically restrained
Rotationally free
Support B Vertically restrained
Rotationally free
Applied loading
Beam loads Dead full UDL 3 kN/m
Imposed full UDL 1 kN/m
Dead self weight of beam 1
36
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Load combinations
Load combination 1 Support A Dead 1.40
Imposed 1.60
Dead 1.40
Imposed 1.60
Support B Dead 1.40
Imposed 1.60
Analysis results
Maximum moment; Mmax = 16.1 kNm; Mmin = 0 kNm
Maximum shear; Vmax = 14 kN; Vmin = -14 kN
Deflection; max = 8.9 mm; min = 0 mm
Maximum reaction at support A; RA_max = 14 kN; RA_min = 14 kN
Unfactored dead load reaction at support A; RA_Dead = 7.3 kN
Unfactored imposed load reaction at support A; RA_Imposed = 2.3 kN
Maximum reaction at support B; RB_max = 14 kN; RB_min = 14 kN
Unfactored dead load reaction at support B; RB_Dead = 7.3 kN
Unfactored imposed load reaction at support B; RB_Imposed = 2.3 kN
Section details
Section type; UB 178x102x19 (BS4-1)
Steel grade; S355
From table 9: Design strength py
Thickness of element; max(T, t) = 7.9 mm
Design strength; py = 355 N/mm2
Modulus of elasticity; E = 205000 N/mm2
37
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
7.9
177.8
7.9
Lateral restraint
Span 1 has lateral restraint at supports only
Effective length factors
Effective length factor in major axis; Kx = 1.00
Effective length factor in minor axis; Ky = 1.00
Effective length factor for lateral-torsional buckling; KLT.A = 1.00;
KLT.B = 1.00;
Classification of cross sections - Section 3.5
= [275 N/mm2 / py] = 0.88
Internal compression parts - Table 11
Depth of section; d = 146.8 mm
d / t = 34.7 <= 80 ; Class 1 plastic
Outstand flanges - Table 11
Width of section; b = B / 2 = 50.6 mm
b / T = 7.3 <= 9 ; Class 1 plastic
Section is class 1 plastic
Shear capacity - Section 4.2.3
Design shear force; Fv = max(abs(Vmax), abs(Vmin)) = 14 kN
38
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
d / t < 70
Web does not need to be checked for shear buckling
Shear area; Av = t D = 853 mm2
Design shear resistance; Pv = 0.6 py Av = 181.8 kN
PASS - Design shear resistance exceeds design shear force
Moment capacity - Section 4.2.5
Design bending moment; M = max(abs(Ms1_max), abs(Ms1_min)) = 16.1 kNm
Moment capacity low shear - cl.4.2.5.2; Mc = min(py Sxx, 1.2 py Zxx) = 60.8 kNm
Effective length for lateral-torsional buckling - Section 4.3.5
Effective length for lateral torsional buckling; LE = 1.0 Ls1 = 4610 mm
Slenderness ratio; = LE / ryy = 194.207
Equivalent slenderness - Section 4.3.6.7
Buckling parameter; u = 0.888
Torsional index; x = 22.560
Slenderness factor; v = 1 / [1 + 0.05 ( / x)2]0.25 = 0.679
Ratio - cl.4.3.6.9; W = 1.000
Equivalent slenderness - cl.4.3.6.7; LT = u v [W] = 117.047
Limiting slenderness - Annex B.2.2; L0 = 0.4 (2 E / py)0.5 = 30.198
LT > L0 - Allowance should be made for lateral-torsional buckling
Bending strength - Section 4.3.6.5
Robertson constant; LT = 7.0
Perry factor; LT = max(LT (LT - L0) / 1000, 0) = 0.608
Euler stress; pE = 2 E / LT2 = 147.7 N/mm2
LT = (py + (LT + 1) pE) / 2 = 296.2 N/mm2
Bending strength - Annex B.2.1; pb = pE py / (LT + (LT2 - pE py)0.5) = 108.3 N/mm2
Equivalent uniform moment factor - Section 4.3.6.6
Moment at quarter point of segment; M2 = 12.1 kNm
Moment at centre-line of segment; M3 = 16.1 kNm
Moment at three quarter point of segment; M4 = 12.1 kNm
Maximum moment in segment; Mabs = 16.1 kNm
Maximum moment governing buckling resistance; MLT = Mabs = 16.1 kNm
Equivalent uniform moment factor for lateral-torsional buckling;
mLT = max(0.2 + (0.15 M2 + 0.5 M3 + 0.15 M4) / Mabs, 0.44) = 0.925
39
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Buckling resistance moment - Section 4.3.6.4
Buckling resistance moment; Mb = pb Sxx = 18.5 kNm
Mb / mLT = 20 kNm
PASS - Buckling resistance moment exceeds design bending moment
Check vertical deflection - Section 2.5.2
Consider deflection due to dead and imposed loads
Limiting deflection;; lim = Ls1 / 250 = 18.44 mm
Maximum deflection span 1; = max(abs(max), abs(min)) = 8.858 mm
PASS - Maximum deflection does not exceed deflection limit
40
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
2. CONNECTION DESIGN
CONNECTION-1 Splice Connection
Material
Steel S 355
Project item CON1
Design
Name CON1
Description
Analysis Stress, strain/ simplified loading
Beams and columns
β– γ- α- Offset Offset Offset
Cross- Forces
Name Direction Pitch Rotation ex ey ez
section in
[°] [°] [°] [mm] [mm] [mm]
2 - UC 152 x
B1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 Node
152 x 23
2 - UC 152 x
B2 180.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 Node
152 x 23
41
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
42
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
43
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
44
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Cross-sections
Name Material
2 - UC 152 x 152 x 23 S 355
Cross-sections
Name Material Drawing
45
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
2 - UC 152 x 152 x 23 S 355
Bolts
Diameter fu Gross area
Name Bolt assembly
[mm] [MPa] [mm2]
M12 8.8 M12 8.8 12 800.0 113
Load effects (equilibrium not required)
N Vy Vz Mx My Mz
Name Member
[kN] [kN] [kN] [kNm] [kNm] [kNm]
LE1 B1 0.0 0.0 -7.0 0.0 3.0 0.0
Check
Summary
Name Value Status
Analysis 100.0% OK
Plates 0.0 < 5.0% OK
Bolts 6.5 < 100% OK
Buckling Not calculated
46
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Plates
Thickness σEd εPl σcEd
Name Loads Status
[mm] [MPa] [%] [MPa]
B1-bfl 1 6.8 LE1 33.0 0.0 0.9 OK
B1-tfl 1 6.8 LE1 34.9 0.0 0.8 OK
B1-w 1 5.8 LE1 27.3 0.0 0.8 OK
B2-bfl 1 6.8 LE1 40.3 0.0 1.3 OK
B2-tfl 1 6.8 LE1 47.6 0.0 7.2 OK
B2-w 1 5.8 LE1 46.2 0.0 7.2 OK
SPL3a 10.0 LE1 16.7 0.0 0.2 OK
SPL3b 10.0 LE1 16.2 0.0 0.2 OK
SPL1a 10.0 LE1 39.5 0.0 7.2 OK
SPL1b 10.0 LE1 41.4 0.0 0.8 OK
SPL1c 10.0 LE1 41.4 0.0 0.8 OK
SPL2a 10.0 LE1 31.5 0.0 0.8 OK
SPL2b 10.0 LE1 35.6 0.0 1.3 OK
SPL2c 10.0 LE1 35.6 0.0 1.3 OK
Design data
fy εlim
Material
[MPa] [%]
S 355 355.0 5.0
47
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Overall check, LE1
48
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Strain check, LE1
49
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Equivalent stress, LE1
Bolts
Ft,Ed V Utt Fb,Rd Uts Utts
Name Loads Status
[kN] [kN] [%] [kN] [%] [%]
B1 LE1 0.0 0.3 0.1 57.9 1.1 1.0 OK
B2 LE1 0.0 0.2 0.0 68.2 0.7 0.7 OK
B3 LE1 0.0 0.6 0.0 68.2 1.9 1.9 OK
B4 LE1 0.0 0.3 0.0 68.2 0.9 0.9 OK
B5 LE1 0.0 0.2 0.1 68.2 0.7 0.7 OK
B6 LE1 0.1 0.6 0.2 52.9 2.3 2.0 OK
B7 LE1 0.1 1.3 0.3 64.8 4.0 4.2 OK
B8 LE1 0.1 0.5 0.1 68.2 1.6 1.7 OK
50
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
B9 LE1 0.0 1.0 0.1 68.2 3.1 3.1 OK
B10 LE1 0.0 1.3 0.1 68.2 4.0 4.1 OK
B11 LE1 0.0 0.5 0.0 68.2 1.6 1.6 OK
B12 LE1 0.1 1.0 0.2 68.2 3.0 3.1 OK
B13 LE1 1.2 1.5 2.6 61.5 4.7 6.5 OK
B14 LE1 0.5 1.5 0.9 80.0 4.8 5.5 OK
B15 LE1 0.3 1.6 0.6 80.0 4.9 5.3 OK
B16 LE1 1.2 1.5 2.6 61.5 4.7 6.5 OK
B17 LE1 0.5 1.5 0.9 80.0 4.8 5.5 OK
B18 LE1 0.3 1.6 0.6 80.0 4.9 5.3 OK
B19 LE1 0.9 1.4 1.8 61.5 4.4 5.6 OK
B20 LE1 0.2 1.5 0.5 80.0 4.8 5.1 OK
B21 LE1 0.4 1.7 0.9 80.0 5.2 5.8 OK
B22 LE1 0.9 1.4 1.8 61.5 4.4 5.6 OK
B23 LE1 0.2 1.5 0.5 80.0 4.8 5.1 OK
B24 LE1 0.4 1.7 0.9 80.0 5.2 5.8 OK
B25 LE1 1.2 1.5 2.4 80.0 4.6 6.3 OK
B26 LE1 0.3 1.5 0.6 80.0 4.7 5.1 OK
B27 LE1 0.1 1.6 0.2 80.0 4.8 5.0 OK
B28 LE1 1.2 1.5 2.4 80.0 4.6 6.3 OK
B29 LE1 0.3 1.5 0.6 80.0 4.7 5.1 OK
B30 LE1 0.1 1.6 0.2 80.0 4.8 5.0 OK
B31 LE1 1.0 1.4 2.1 80.0 4.3 5.8 OK
B32 LE1 0.2 1.5 0.4 80.0 4.7 5.1 OK
B33 LE1 0.1 1.7 0.3 80.0 5.2 5.4 OK
B34 LE1 1.0 1.4 2.1 80.0 4.3 5.8 OK
B35 LE1 0.2 1.5 0.4 80.0 4.7 5.1 OK
B36 LE1 0.1 1.7 0.3 80.0 5.2 5.4 OK
Design data
Ft,Rd Bp,Rd Fv,Rd
Name
[kN] [kN] [kN]
M12 8.8 - 1 48.4 147.8 32.3
Detailed result for B13
Tension resistance check (EN 1993-1-8 tab 3.4)
51
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
48.4 kN ≥ 1.2 kN
where:
– Factor
– Ultimate tensile strength of the bolt
– Tensile stress area of the bolt
– Safety factor
Punching resistance check (EN 1993-1-8 tab 3.4)
147.8 kN ≥ 1.2 kN
where:
– The mean of the across points and across flats dimensions of the
bolt head or the nut, whichever is smaller
– Thickness
– Ultimate strength
– Safety factor
Shear resistance check (EN 1993-1-8 tab 3.4)
32.3 kN ≥ 1.5 kN
where:
– Reducing factor
– Reducing factor
– Ultimate tensile strength of the bolt
– Tensile stress area of the bolt
– Safety factor
Bearing resistance check (EN 1993-1-8 tab 3.4)
61.5 kN ≥ 2.7 kN
where:
– Factor for edge distance and bolt
spacing perpendicular to the
direction of load transfer
52
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
– Factor for end distance and bolt
spacing in direction of load transfer
– Distance to the plate edge
perpendicular to the shear force
– Distance between bolts
perpendicular to the shear force
– Bolt hole diameter
– Distance to the plate edge in the
direction of the shear force
– Distance between bolts in the
direction of the shear force
– Ultimate tensile strength of the bolt
– Ultimate strength
– Nominal diameter of the fastener
– Thickness of the plate
– Safety factor
Interaction of tension and shear (EN 1993-1-8 tab 3.4)
6.5 %
Utilization in tension
2.6 %
Utilization in shear
4.7 %
Buckling
Buckling analysis was not calculated.
53
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Bill of material
Manufacturing operations
Plates Welds Length
Name Shape Nr. Bolts Nr.
[mm] [mm] [mm]
SPL3 P10.0x320.0-95.6 (S 355) 1 M12 8.8 12
P10.0x320.0-95.6 (S 355) 1
SPL1 P10.0x320.0-152.2 (S 355) 1 M12 8.8 12
P10.0x320.0-63.0 (S 355) 1
P10.0x320.0-63.0 (S 355) 1
54
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
SPL2 P10.0x320.0-152.2 (S 355) 1 M12 8.8 12
P10.0x320.0-63.0 (S 355) 1
P10.0x320.0-63.0 (S 355) 1
Bolts
Grip length
Name Count
[mm]
M12 8.8 26 12
M12 8.8 27 24
55
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Drawing
SPL3 - SPL3a
P10.0x96-320 (S 355)
56
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
SPL3 - SPL3b
P10.0x96-320 (S 355)
57
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
SPL1 - SPL1a
P10.0x152-320 (S 355)
58
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
SPL1 - SPL1b
P10.0x63-320 (S 355)
SPL1 - SPL1c
P10.0x63-320 (S 355)
59
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
SPL2 - SPL2a
P10.0x152-320 (S 355)
60
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
SPL2 - SPL2b
P10.0x63-320 (S 355)
SPL2 - SPL2c
P10.0x63-320 (S 355)
61
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
B1, UC 152 x 152 x 23 - Bottom flange 1:
62
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
B1, UC 152 x 152 x 23 - Top flange 1:
63
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
B1, UC 152 x 152 x 23 - Web 1:
64
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
B2, UC 152 x 152 x 23 - Bottom flange 1:
65
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
B2, UC 152 x 152 x 23 - Top flange 1:
66
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
B2, UC 152 x 152 x 23 - Web 1:
Code settings
Item Value Unit Reference
γM0 1.00 - EN 1993-1-1: 6.1
γM1 1.00 - EN 1993-1-1: 6.1
γM2 1.25 - EN 1993-1-1: 6.1
γM3 1.25 - EN 1993-1-8: 2.2
γC 1.50 - EN 1992-1-1: 2.4.2.4
γInst 1.20 - EN 1992-4: Table 4.1
Joint coefficient βj 0.67 - EN 1993-1-8: 6.2.5
Effective area - influence of
0.10 -
mesh size
Friction coefficient - concrete 0.25 - EN 1993-1-8
Friction coefficient in slip-
0.30 - EN 1993-1-8 tab 3.7
resistance
Limit plastic strain 0.05 - EN 1993-1-5
67
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Plastic
Weld stress evaluation
redistribution
Detailing No
Distance between bolts [d] 2.20 - EN 1993-1-8: tab 3.3
Distance between bolts and
1.20 - EN 1993-1-8: tab 3.3
edge [d]
Concrete breakout
Both EN 1992-4: 7.2.1.4 and 7.2.2.5
resistance check
Use calculated αb in bearing
Yes EN 1993-1-8: tab 3.4
check.
Cracked concrete Yes EN 1992-4
Local deformation check No CIDECT DG 1, 3 - 1.1
Local deformation limit 0.03 - CIDECT DG 1, 3 - 1.1
Geometrical nonlinearity Analysis with large deformations for
Yes
(GMNA) hollow section joints
Braced system No EN 1993-1-8: 5.2.2.5
68
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
CONNECTION -2 Shear Connection
Material
Steel S 275, S 355
Concrete C25/30
Project item Connection - 3
Design
Name Connection - 3
Description
Analysis Stress, strain/ simplified loading
Beams and columns
β– γ- α- Offset Offset Offset
Cross- Forces X
Name Direction Pitch Rotation ex ey ez
section in [mm]
[°] [°] [°] [mm] [mm] [mm]
7 - UB 178
M1 -90.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 13 Bolts 53
x 102 x 19
8 - UC 203
M2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 Bolts 0
x 203 x 46
69
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
70
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
71
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
72
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Cross-sections
Name Material
7 - UB 178 x 102 x 19 S 355
8 - UC 203 x 203 x 46 S 355
3 - L90X7 S 355
Cross-sections
Name Material Drawing
73
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
7 - UB 178 x 102 x 19 S 355
8 - UC 203 x 203 x 46 S 355
3 - L90X7 S 355
74
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Bolts
Diameter fu Gross area
Name Bolt assembly
[mm] [MPa] [mm2]
M16 8.8 M16 8.8 16 800.0 201
Load effects (equilibrium not required)
N Vy Vz Mx My Mz
Name Member
[kN] [kN] [kN] [kNm] [kNm] [kNm]
LE1 M1 0.0 0.0 -10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Check
Summary
Name Value Status
Analysis 100.0% OK
Plates 0.0 < 5.0% OK
Bolts 12.8 < 100% OK
Welds 2.2 < 100% OK
Buckling Not calculated
Plates
Thickness σEd εPl σcEd
Name Loads Status
[mm] [MPa] [%] [MPa]
M1-bfl 1 7.9 LE1 18.4 0.0 0.0 OK
M1-tfl 1 7.9 LE1 18.3 0.0 0.0 OK
M1-w 1 4.8 LE1 61.1 0.0 19.6 OK
M2-bfl 1 11.0 LE1 14.7 0.0 0.0 OK
M2-tfl 1 11.0 LE1 15.3 0.0 0.0 OK
M2-w 1 7.2 LE1 48.0 0.0 34.4 OK
CLEAT1 a-bfl 1 7.0 LE1 58.2 0.0 34.4 OK
CLEAT1 a-w 1 7.0 LE1 54.5 0.0 34.4 OK
CLEAT1 b-bfl 1 7.0 LE1 58.3 0.0 34.1 OK
CLEAT1 b-w 1 7.0 LE1 54.7 0.0 34.1 OK
75
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
STIFF1 10.0 LE1 7.4 0.0 0.0 OK
Design data
fy εlim
Material
[MPa] [%]
S 355 355.0 5.0
Overall check, LE1
76
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Strain check, LE1
77
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Equivalent stress, LE1
Bolts
Ft,Ed V Utt Fb,Rd Uts Utts
Name Loads Status
[kN] [kN] [%] [kN] [%] [%]
B1 LE1 2.3 2.5 2.5 75.3 6.8 6.0 OK
B2 LE1 1.7 2.5 1.8 38.5 12.8 5.4 OK
B3 LE1 1.5 2.7 1.7 109.8 4.5 5.7 OK
78
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
B4 LE1 4.7 2.5 5.2 88.4 4.2 8.0 OK
B5 LE1 1.5 2.7 1.7 109.8 4.5 5.7 OK
B6 LE1 4.7 2.5 5.2 88.4 4.2 8.0 OK
Design data
Ft,Rd Bp,Rd Fv,Rd
Name
[kN] [kN] [kN]
M16 8.8 - 1 90.4 129.3 60.3
Detailed result for B2
Tension resistance check (EN 1993-1-8 tab 3.4)
90.4 kN ≥ 1.7 kN
where:
– Factor
– Ultimate tensile strength of the bolt
– Tensile stress area of the bolt
– Safety factor
Punching resistance check (EN 1993-1-8 tab 3.4)
129.3 kN ≥ 1.7 kN
where:
– The mean of the across points and across flats dimensions of the
bolt head or the nut, whichever is smaller
79
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
– Thickness
– Ultimate strength
– Safety factor
Shear resistance check (EN 1993-1-8 tab 3.4)
60.3 kN ≥ 2.5 kN
where:
– Reducing factor
– Reducing factor
– Ultimate tensile strength of the bolt
– Tensile stress area of the bolt
– Safety factor
Bearing resistance check (EN 1993-1-8 tab 3.4)
38.5 kN ≥ 4.9 kN
where:
– Factor for edge distance and bolt
spacing perpendicular to the
direction of load transfer
– Factor for end distance and bolt
spacing in direction of load transfer
– Distance to the plate edge
perpendicular to the shear force
– Distance between bolts
perpendicular to the shear force
– Bolt hole diameter
– Distance to the plate edge in the
direction of the shear force
– Distance between bolts in the
direction of the shear force
– Ultimate tensile strength of the bolt
– Ultimate strength
80
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
– Nominal diameter of the fastener
– Thickness of the plate
– Safety factor
Interaction of tension and shear (EN 1993-1-8 tab 3.4)
5.4 %
Utilization in tension
1.8 %
Utilization in shear
12.8 %
Welds (Plastic redistribution)
Throa Lengt σw,Ed εPl σ⏊ τ|| τ⏊ Ut Utc
Ite Load Statu
Edge t th. h [MPa [% [MPa [MPa [MPa [% [%
m s s
[mm] [mm] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]
M2- STIFF
◢7.5◢ 98 LE1 3.8 0.0 -0.9 1.9 -0.9 0.9 0.6 OK
bfl 1 1
◢7.5◢ 98 LE1 3.8 0.0 -0.9 -1.9 0.9 0.9 0.6 OK
M2- STIFF
◢7.5◢ 181 LE1 9.8 0.0 -4.7 -1.5 -4.7 2.2 0.9 OK
w1 1
◢7.5◢ 181 LE1 9.8 0.0 -4.7 1.5 4.7 2.2 0.9 OK
M2- STIFF
◢7.5◢ 98 LE1 2.6 0.0 -0.4 1.4 -0.4 0.6 0.5 OK
tfl 1 1
◢7.5◢ 98 LE1 2.6 0.0 -0.4 -1.4 0.4 0.6 0.5 OK
Design data
βw σw,Rd 0.9 σ
[-] [MPa] [MPa]
S 355 0.90 435.6 352.8
81
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Detailed result for M2-w 1 STIFF1
Weld resistance check (EN 1993-1-8 4.5.3.2)
435.6 MPa ≥ 9.8 MPa
352.8 MPa ≥ 4.7 MPa
where:
– Ultimate strength
– appropriate correlation factor taken from Table 4.1
– Safety factor
Stress utilization
2.2 %
Buckling
Buckling analysis was not calculated.
Bill of material
Manufacturing operations
Plates Welds Length
Name Shape Nr. Bolts Nr.
[mm] [mm] [mm]
CUT1
P10.0x98.2-181.2 (S Double fillet: a =
STIFF1 1 377.6
355) 7.5
82
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Welds
Throat thickness Leg size Length
Type Material
[mm] [mm] [mm]
Double fillet S 355 7.5 10.6 377.6
Bolts
Grip length
Name Count
[mm]
M16 8.8 19 2
M16 8.8 14 4
83
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Drawing
STIFF1
P10.0x181-98 (S 355)
84
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
M1, UB 178 x 102 x 19 - Web 1:
85
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
M2, UC 203 x 203 x 46 - Web 1:
86
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
CLEAT1 a, L90X7 - Bottom flange 1:
87
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
CLEAT1 a, L90X7 - Web 1:
88
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
CLEAT1 b, L90X7 - Bottom flange 1:
89
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
CLEAT1 b, L90X7 - Web 1:
90
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
CONNECTION-3 Beam to Column Connection
Material
Steel S 255, S 355
Concrete C25/30
Project item Connection - 3
Design
Name Connection - 3
Description
Analysis Stress, strain/ simplified loading
Beams and columns
β– γ- α- Offset Offset Offset
Cross- Forces X
Name Direction Pitch Rotation ex ey ez
section in [mm]
[°] [°] [°] [mm] [mm] [mm]
1 - UC 203
M1 90.0 90.0 0.0 100 0 0 Bolts 0
x 203 x 46
1 - UC 203
M2 90.0 0.0 0.0 -103 0 0 Bolts 158
x 203 x 46
91
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
92
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
93
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
94
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Cross-sections
Name Material
1 - UC 203 x 203 x 46 S 355
Cross-sections
Name Material Drawing
95
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
1 - UC 203 x 203 x 46 S 355
Bolts
Diameter fu Gross area
Name Bolt assembly
[mm] [MPa] [mm2]
M20 8.8 M20 8.8 20 800.0 314
Load effects (equilibrium not required)
N Vy Vz Mx My Mz
Name Member
[kN] [kN] [kN] [kNm] [kNm] [kNm]
LE2 M2 0.0 0.0 -40.0 0.0 30.0 0.0
Check
Summary
Name Value Status
Analysis 100.0% OK
Plates 0.0 < 5.0% OK
Bolts 44.6 < 100% OK
Welds 47.0 < 100% OK
Buckling Not calculated
96
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Plates
Thickness σEd εPl σcEd
Name Loads Status
[mm] [MPa] [%] [MPa]
M1-bfl 1 11.0 LE2 75.3 0.0 0.0 OK
M1-tfl 1 11.0 LE2 125.2 0.0 0.0 OK
M1-w 1 7.2 LE2 201.8 0.0 0.0 OK
M2-bfl 1 11.0 LE2 351.2 0.0 32.0 OK
M2-tfl 1 11.0 LE2 61.3 0.0 0.0 OK
M2-w 1 7.2 LE2 138.4 0.0 0.0 OK
EP1 18.0 LE2 172.9 0.0 32.0 OK
RIB1 10.0 LE2 285.6 0.0 0.0 OK
STIFF2 10.0 LE2 28.2 0.0 0.0 OK
STIFF3 10.0 LE2 30.0 0.0 0.0 OK
STIFF4a 10.0 LE2 66.6 0.0 0.0 OK
STIFF4b 10.0 LE2 66.7 0.0 0.0 OK
Design data
fy εlim
Material
[MPa] [%]
S 355 355.0 5.0
97
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Overall check, LE2
98
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Strain check, LE2
99
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Equivalent stress, LE2
Bolts
Ft,Ed V Utt Fb,Rd Uts Utts
Name Loads Status
[kN] [kN] [%] [kN] [%] [%]
B1 LE2 17.3 1.3 12.2 204.8 1.4 10.1 OK
B2 LE2 17.4 1.3 12.3 204.8 1.3 10.2 OK
B3 LE2 2.1 2.8 1.5 215.6 3.0 4.0 OK
B4 LE2 2.1 2.8 1.5 215.6 3.0 4.0 OK
B5 LE2 63.0 1.8 44.6 175.0 1.9 33.8 OK
B6 LE2 62.9 1.8 44.6 174.8 1.9 33.7 OK
100
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Design data
Ft,Rd Bp,Rd Fv,Rd
Name
[kN] [kN] [kN]
M20 8.8 - 1 141.1 256.0 94.1
Detailed result for B5
Tension resistance check (EN 1993-1-8 tab 3.4)
141.1 kN ≥ 63.0 kN
where:
– Factor
– Ultimate tensile strength of the bolt
– Tensile stress area of the bolt
– Safety factor
Punching resistance check (EN 1993-1-8 tab 3.4)
256.0 kN ≥ 63.0 kN
where:
– The mean of the across points and across flats dimensions of the
bolt head or the nut, whichever is smaller
– Thickness
– Ultimate strength
– Safety factor
Shear resistance check (EN 1993-1-8 tab 3.4)
94.1 kN ≥ 1.8 kN
where:
– Reducing factor
– Reducing factor
– Ultimate tensile strength of the bolt
101
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
– Tensile stress area of the bolt
– Safety factor
Bearing resistance check (EN 1993-1-8 tab 3.4)
175.0 kN ≥ 1.8 kN
where:
– Factor for edge distance and bolt
spacing perpendicular to the
direction of load transfer
– Factor for end distance and bolt
spacing in direction of load transfer
– Distance to the plate edge
perpendicular to the shear force
– Distance between bolts
perpendicular to the shear force
– Bolt hole diameter
– Distance to the plate edge in the
direction of the shear force
– Distance between bolts in the
direction of the shear force
– Ultimate tensile strength of the bolt
– Ultimate strength
– Nominal diameter of the fastener
– Thickness of the plate
– Safety factor
Interaction of tension and shear (EN 1993-1-8 tab 3.4)
33.8 %
Utilization in tension
44.6 %
Utilization in shear
1.9 %
102
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Welds (Plastic redistribution)
Throa Lengt σw,Ed εPl σ⏊ τ|| τ⏊
Ite Load Ut Utc Statu
Edge t th. h [MPa [% [MPa [MPa [MPa
m s [%] [%] s
[mm] [mm] ] ] ] ] ]
M1-bfl
EP1 ◢9.5 204 LE2 37.4 0.0 14.5 0.0 -19.9 8.6 6.9 OK
1
11.
EP1 M1-tfl 1 ◢9.5 204 LE2 51.5 0.0 -19.5 -20.4 18.5 6.6 OK
8
37. 26.
EP1 M1-w 1 ◢9.5 192 LE2 162.6 0.0 52.0 72.1 -52.1 OK
3 0
◢7.5 47. 26.
EP1 RIB1 150 LE2 204.8 0.0 -90.0 56.4 -90.0 OK
◢ 0 8
◢7.5 47. 26.
150 LE2 204.8 0.0 -89.9 -56.4 90.0 OK
◢ 0 8
M1- ◢7.5 36. 20.
RIB1 200 LE2 160.8 0.0 -42.1 -79.1 -42.1 OK
tfl 1 ◢ 9 8
◢7.5 36. 20.
200 LE2 160.8 0.0 -42.1 79.1 42.1 OK
◢ 9 8
M2- 12.
STIFF2 ◢6.5 98 LE2 52.2 0.0 43.9 -11.0 -12.0 8.2 OK
bfl 1 4
M2-
STIFF2 ◢6.5 181 LE2 37.6 0.0 -29.9 -8.3 -10.2 8.6 3.9 OK
w1
M2-
STIFF2 ◢6.5 98 LE2 15.2 0.0 11.1 6.0 0.7 3.5 1.2 OK
tfl 1
M2- 11.
STIFF3 ◢6.5 98 LE2 45.2 0.0 39.8 8.3 9.1 8.5 OK
bfl 1 3
M2-
STIFF3 ◢6.5 181 LE2 38.9 0.0 -33.6 3.3 10.9 9.5 3.9 OK
w1
M2-
STIFF3 ◢6.5 98 LE2 14.3 0.0 10.7 -5.3 -1.0 3.3 1.1 OK
tfl 1
M2- STIFF4 ◢6.0
98 LE2 27.0 0.0 -14.1 6.1 -11.8 6.2 5.0 OK
bfl 1 a ◢
◢6.0
98 LE2 38.0 0.0 18.4 14.8 -12.2 8.7 6.1 OK
◢
M2- STIFF4 ◢6.0
181 LE2 23.9 0.0 15.4 8.4 6.4 5.5 2.3 OK
w1 a ◢
◢6.0
181 LE2 19.9 0.0 -6.1 7.2 -8.2 4.6 1.8 OK
◢
M2- STIFF4 ◢6.0
98 LE2 14.4 0.0 12.1 1.8 -4.1 3.4 2.8 OK
tfl 1 a ◢
103
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
◢6.0
98 LE2 16.0 0.0 -15.9 -0.7 -0.3 4.5 2.7 OK
◢
M2- STIFF4 ◢6.0
98 LE2 38.2 0.0 18.5 -15.0 12.1 8.8 6.1 OK
bfl 1 b ◢
◢6.0
98 LE2 27.2 0.0 -14.2 -6.2 11.9 6.2 5.0 OK
◢
M2- STIFF4 ◢6.0
181 LE2 19.9 0.0 -6.1 -7.2 8.2 4.6 1.8 OK
w1 b ◢
◢6.0
181 LE2 23.9 0.0 15.4 -8.4 -6.4 5.5 2.3 OK
◢
M2- STIFF4 ◢6.0
98 LE2 16.0 0.0 -15.9 0.7 0.3 4.5 2.7 OK
tfl 1 b ◢
◢6.0
98 LE2 14.4 0.0 12.1 -1.8 4.1 3.4 2.8 OK
◢
Design data
βw σw,Rd 0.9 σ
[-] [MPa] [MPa]
S 355 0.90 435.6 352.8
Detailed result for EP1 RIB1
Weld resistance check (EN 1993-1-8 4.5.3.2)
435. MP 204. MP
≥
6 a 8 a
352.8 MPa ≥ 90.0 MPa
where:
– Ultimate strength
– appropriate correlation factor taken from Table 4.1
– Safety factor
Stress utilization
47.0 %
104
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Buckling
Buckling analysis was not calculated.
Bill of material
Manufacturing operations
Plates Welds Length
Name Shape Nr. Bolts Nr.
[mm] [mm] [mm]
P18.0x203.6-363.2 (S Fillet: a = 9.5 203.6 M20
EP1 1 6
355) Fillet: a = 9.5 395.8 8.8
P10.0x150.0-200.0 (S Double fillet: a
RIB1 1 350.0
355) = 7.5
P10.0x98.2-181.2 (S
STIFF2 1 Fillet: a = 6.5 377.6
355)
P10.0x98.2-181.2 (S
STIFF3 1 Fillet: a = 6.5 377.6
355)
105
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
P10.0x98.2-181.2 (S Double fillet: a
STIFF4 2 755.2
355) = 6.0
Welds
Throat thickness Leg size Length
Type Material
[mm] [mm] [mm]
Fillet S 355 9.5 13.4 203.6
Fillet S 355 9.5 13.4 395.8
Double fillet S 355 7.5 10.6 350.0
Fillet S 355 6.5 9.2 377.6
Fillet S 355 6.5 9.2 377.6
Double fillet S 355 6.0 8.5 755.2
Bolts
Grip length
Name Count
[mm]
M20 8.8 29 6
106
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Drawing
EP1
P18.0x363-204 (S 355)
107
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
RIB1
P10.0x200-150 (S 355)
108
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
STIFF2
P10.0x181-98 (S 355)
109
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
STIFF3
P10.0x181-98 (S 355)
110
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
STIFF4
P10.0x181-98 (S 355)
111
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
M2, UC 203 x 203 x 46 - Bottom flange 1:
112
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
CONNECTION-4 Column to Foundation
Material
Steel S 355
Concrete C25/30
Project item CON1
Design
Name CON1
Description
Analysis Stress, strain/ simplified loading
Beams and columns
β– γ- α- Offset Offset Offset
Cross- Forces
Name Direction Pitch Rotation ex ey ez
section in
[°] [°] [°] [mm] [mm] [mm]
3 - UC 203 x
COL 0.0 -90.0 0.0 0 0 0 Node
203 x 46
113
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
114
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
115
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
116
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Cross-sections
Name Material
3 - UC 203 x 203 x 46 S 355
Cross-sections
Name Material Drawing
117
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
3 - UC 203 x 203 x 46 S 355
Anchors
Diameter fu Gross area
Name Bolt assembly
[mm] [MPa] [mm2]
M24 8.8 M24 8.8 24 800.0 452
Load effects (equilibrium not required)
N Vy Vz Mx My Mz
Name Member
[kN] [kN] [kN] [kNm] [kNm] [kNm]
LE1 COL -81.0 34.0 0.0 0.0 29.0 0.0
Foundation block
Item Value Unit
CB 1
Dimensions 1200 x 1197 mm
Depth 800 mm
Anchor M24 8.8
Anchoring length 400 mm
Shear force transfer Friction
118
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Check
Summary
Name Value Status
Analysis 100.0% OK
Plates 0.0 < 5.0% OK
Anchors 67.7 < 100% OK
Welds 42.0 < 100% OK
Concrete block 28.0 < 100% OK
Shear 70.2 < 100% OK
Buckling Not calculated
Plates
Thickness σEd εPl σcEd
Name Loads Status
[mm] [MPa] [%] [MPa]
COL-bfl 1 11.0 LE1 157.3 0.0 0.0 OK
COL-tfl 1 11.0 LE1 178.5 0.0 0.0 OK
COL-w 1 7.2 LE1 70.4 0.0 0.0 OK
BP1 20.0 LE1 158.6 0.0 0.0 OK
RIB3 12.0 LE1 138.8 0.0 0.0 OK
Design data
fy εlim
Material
[MPa] [%]
S 355 355.0 5.0
119
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Overall check, LE1
120
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Strain check, LE1
121
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Equivalent stress, LE1
Anchors
NEd VEd NRd,c VRd,cp Utt Uts Utts
Shape Item Loads Status
[kN] [kN] [kN] [kN] [%] [%] [%]
A5 LE1 46.7 0.0 155.4 442.4 67.7 0.0 55.7 OK
A6 LE1 47.3 0.0 155.4 442.4 67.7 0.0 55.7 OK
A7 LE1 5.2 0.0 155.4 442.4 67.7 0.0 55.7 OK
A8 LE1 5.9 0.0 155.4 442.4 67.7 0.0 55.7 OK
122
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Design data
NRd,s VRd,s
Grade
[kN] [kN]
M24 8.8 - 1 160.0 113.0
Detailed result for A5
Anchor tensile resistance (EN1992-4 - Cl. 7.2.1.3)
160.0 kN ≥ 46.7 kN
240.0 kN
Where:
– reduction factor for cut thread
– tensile stress area
– minimum tensile strength of the bolt
– safety factor for steel
, where:
640.0 MPa – minimum yield strength of the bolt
Concrete breakout resistance of anchor in tension (EN1992-4 - Cl. 7.2.1.4)
The check is performed for group of anchors that form common tension breakout
cone: A5, A6, A7, A8
155.4 kN ≥ 105.1 kN
279.7 kN
Where:
– sum of tension forces of anchors with common concrete breakout
cone area
123
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
– characteristic strength of a fastener, remote from the effects of
adjacent fasteners or edges of the concrete member
, where:
7.70 – parameter accounting for anchor type and concrete condition
25.0 MPa – concrete compressive strength
318 mm – depth of embedment, where:
400 mm – anchor length embedded in concrete
477 mm – maximum distance from the anchor to one of the three closest edges
300 mm – maximum spacing between anchors
– concrete breakout cone area for group of anchors
– concrete breakout cone area for single anchor not influenced by
edges
, where:
318 mm – depth of embedment
– parameter related to the distribution of stresses in the concrete due
to the proximity of the fastener to an edge of the concrete member:
, where:
450 mm – minimum distance from the anchor to the edge
318 mm – depth of embedment
– parameter accounting for the shell spalling:
, where:
400 mm – anchor length embedded in concrete
124
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
– modification factor for anchor groups loaded eccentrically in
tension:
, where:
0.85 – modification factor that depends on eccentricity in x-direction
87 mm – tension load eccentricity in x-direction
1.00 – modification factor that depends on eccentricity in y-direction
2 mm – tension load eccentricity in y-direction
318 mm – depth of embedment
– parameter accounting for the effect of a compression force
between the fixture and concrete; this parameter is equal to 1 if c <
1.5hef or the ratio of the compressive force (including the
compression due to bending) to the sum of tensile forces in anchors
is smaller than 0.8
, where:
203 mm – internal lever arm
318 mm – depth of embedment
– safety factor for concrete
Shear resistance (EN1992-4 - Cl.7.2.2.3.1)
113.0 kN ≥ 0.0 kN
141.2 kN
Where:
– coefficient for anchor steel ductility
125
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
, where:
0.12 – bolt grade elongation at rupture
– the characteristic shear strength
, where:
0.50 – coefficient for anchor resistance in shear
353 mm2 – tensile stress area
800.0 MPa – specified ultimate strength of anchor steel
– safety factor for steel
Concrete pryout resistance (EN1992-4 - Cl. 7.2.2.4)
The check is performed for group of anchors on common base plate
442.4 kN ≥ 0.0 kN
663.7 kN
Where:
– factor taking into account fastener embedment depth
– characteristic concrete cone strength for a single fastener or fastener
in a group
– safety factor for concrete
Interaction of tensile and shear forces in steel (EN 1992-4 - Table 7.3)
0.09 ≤ 1.0
Where:
126
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
– design tension force
– fastener tensile strength
– design shear force
– fastener shear strength
Interaction of tensile and shear forces in concrete (EN 1992-4 - Table 7.3)
0.56 ≤ 1.0
Where:
– the largest utilization value for tension failure modes
– the largest utilization value for shear failure modes
– concrete breakout failure of anchor in tension
– concrete pullout failure
– concrete blowout failure
– concrete edge failure
– concrete pryout failure
Welds (Plastic redistribution)
Throat Lengt σw,Ed εPl σ⏊ τ|| τ⏊
Edg Load Ut Utc Statu
Item th. h [MPa [% [MPa [MPa [MPa
e s [%] [%] s
[mm] [mm] ] ] ] ] ]
COL ◢10.0 26. 13.
BP1 204 LE1 117.1 0.0 -44.9 -32.9 -53.1 OK
-bfl 1 ◢ 9 9
◢10.0 28. 15.
204 LE1 124.5 0.0 -55.4 43.7 47.2 OK
◢ 6 3
COL ◢10.0 42. 14.
BP1 204 LE1 182.8 0.0 75.1 -81.3 51.4 OK
-tfl 1 ◢ 0 8
127
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
◢10.0 36. 15.
204 LE1 159.4 0.0 48.1 50.4 -71.8 OK
◢ 6 8
COL ◢10.0
BP1 192 LE1 25.6 0.0 -6.9 12.5 -6.8 5.9 4.5 OK
-w 1 ◢
◢10.0
192 LE1 24.7 0.0 -6.2 -12.3 6.3 5.7 4.5 OK
◢
28.
BP1 RIB3 ◢9.0◢ 95 LE1 122.2 0.0 43.6 -49.5 43.5 9.9 OK
1
28.
◢9.0◢ 95 LE1 122.6 0.0 43.9 49.3 -44.0 9.9 OK
1
COL 12.
RIB3 ◢9.0◢ 150 LE1 53.7 0.0 12.8 27.1 13.2 5.8 OK
-tfl 1 3
12.
◢9.0◢ 150 LE1 53.1 0.0 13.1 -26.9 -12.7 5.7 OK
2
Design data
βw σw,Rd 0.9 σ
[-] [MPa] [MPa]
S 355 0.90 435.6 352.8
Detailed result for BP1 COL-tfl 1
Weld resistance check (EN 1993-1-8 4.5.3.2)
435. MP 182. MP
≥
6 a 8 a
352.8 MPa ≥ 75.1 MPa
where:
– Ultimate strength
– appropriate correlation factor taken from Table 4.1
– Safety factor
Stress utilization
42.0 %
128
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Concrete block
c Aeff σ kj Fjd Ut
Item Loads Status
[mm] [mm2] [MPa] [-] [MPa] [%]
CB 1 LE1 38 20672 9.4 3.00 33.5 28.0 OK
Detailed result for CB 1
Concrete block compressive resistance check (EN 1993-1-8 6.2.5)
9.4 MPa
33.5 MPa
where:
– Design normal force
– Effective area, on which the column force N is distributed
– Long-term effects on Fcd
– Joint coefficient βj
– Concentration factor
– Characteristic compressive concrete strength
– Safety factor
Stress utilization
28.0 %
Shear in contact plane
Vy Vz VRd,y VRd,z Vc,Rd Ut
Name Loads Status
[kN] [kN] [kN] [kN] [kN] [%]
BP1 LE1 34.0 0.0 48.4 48.4 0.0 70.2 OK
129
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Detailed result for BP1
Base plate shear resistance check (EN 1993-1-8 - 6.2.2)
48.4 kN
48.4 kN
where:
– Design normal force
– Friction coefficient
Utilization in shear
70.2 %
Buckling
Buckling analysis was not calculated.
Bill of material
Manufacturing operations
Plates Welds Length
Name Shape Nr. Bolts Nr.
[mm] [mm] [mm]
P20.0x399.6-397.2 (S Double fillet: a = M24
BP1 1 599.4 4
355) 10.0 8.8
130
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
P12.0x95.0-150.0 (S Double fillet: a =
RIB3 1 245.0
355) 9.0
Welds
Throat thickness Leg size Length
Type Material
[mm] [mm] [mm]
Double fillet S 355 10.0 14.1 599.4
Double fillet S 355 9.0 12.7 245.0
Anchors
Length Drill length
Name Count
[mm] [mm]
M24 8.8 420 400 4
131
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Drawing
BP1
P20.0x397-400 (S 355)
132
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
RIB3
P12.0x150-95 (S 355)
Code settings
Item Value Unit Reference
γM0 1.00 - EN 1993-1-1: 6.1
γM1 1.00 - EN 1993-1-1: 6.1
γM2 1.25 - EN 1993-1-1: 6.1
γM3 1.25 - EN 1993-1-8: 2.2
133
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
γC 1.50 - EN 1992-1-1: 2.4.2.4
γInst 1.20 - EN 1992-4: Table 4.1
Joint coefficient βj 0.67 - EN 1993-1-8: 6.2.5
Effective area - influence of
0.10 -
mesh size
Friction coefficient - concrete 0.25 - EN 1993-1-8
Friction coefficient in slip-
0.30 - EN 1993-1-8 tab 3.7
resistance
Limit plastic strain 0.05 - EN 1993-1-5
Plastic
Weld stress evaluation
redistribution
Detailing No
Distance between bolts [d] 2.20 - EN 1993-1-8: tab 3.3
Distance between bolts and
1.20 - EN 1993-1-8: tab 3.3
edge [d]
Concrete breakout
Both EN 1992-4: 7.2.1.4 and 7.2.2.5
resistance check
Use calculated αb in bearing
Yes EN 1993-1-8: tab 3.4
check.
Cracked concrete Yes EN 1992-4
Local deformation check No CIDECT DG 1, 3 - 1.1
Local deformation limit 0.03 - CIDECT DG 1, 3 - 1.1
Geometrical nonlinearity Analysis with large deformations for
Yes
(GMNA) hollow section joints
Braced system No EN 1993-1-8: 5.2.2.5
134
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
CONNECTION-5 Shear Connection
Material
Steel S 275, S 355
Concrete C25/30
Project item Connection - 5
Design
Name Connection - 5
Description
Analysis Stress, strain/ simplified loading
Beams and columns
β– γ- α- Offset Offset Offset
Cross- Forces X
Name Direction Pitch Rotation ex ey ez
section in [mm]
[°] [°] [°] [mm] [mm] [mm]
12 - UC
M1 152 x 152 -90.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 25 Bolts 49
x 23
11 - UC
M2 203 x 203 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 Bolts 0
x 46
135
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
136
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
137
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
138
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Cross-sections
Name Material
12 - UC 152 x 152 x 23 S 275
11 - UC 203 x 203 x 46 S 275
3 - L80X10 S 355
Cross-sections
Name Material Drawing
139
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
12 - UC 152 x 152 x
S 275
23
11 - UC 203 x 203 x
S 275
46
3 - L80X10 S 355
140
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Bolts
Diameter fu Gross area
Name Bolt assembly
[mm] [MPa] [mm2]
M16 8.8 M16 8.8 16 800.0 201
Load effects (equilibrium not required)
N Vy Vz Mx My Mz
Name Member
[kN] [kN] [kN] [kNm] [kNm] [kNm]
LE1 M1 0.0 0.0 -8.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Check
Summary
Name Value Status
Analysis 100.0% OK
Plates 0.0 < 5.0% OK
Bolts 10.4 < 100% OK
Welds 3.0 < 100% OK
Buckling Not calculated
Plates
Thickness σEd εPl σcEd
Name Material Loads Status
[mm] [MPa] [%] [MPa]
M1-bfl 1 S 275 6.8 LE1 13.1 0.0 0.0 OK
M1-tfl 1 S 275 6.8 LE1 13.4 0.0 0.0 OK
M1-w 1 S 275 5.8 LE1 57.0 0.0 15.4 OK
M2-bfl 1 S 275 11.0 LE1 11.1 0.0 0.0 OK
M2-tfl 1 S 275 11.0 LE1 11.9 0.0 0.0 OK
M2-w 1 S 275 7.2 LE1 42.3 0.0 20.4 OK
CLEAT1 a-bfl 1 S 355 10.0 LE1 33.5 0.0 20.4 OK
CLEAT1 a-w 1 S 355 10.0 LE1 37.5 0.0 20.4 OK
CLEAT1 b-bfl 1 S 355 10.0 LE1 33.2 0.0 19.9 OK
CLEAT1 b-w 1 S 355 10.0 LE1 37.3 0.0 19.9 OK
141
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
STIFF1 S 355 10.0 LE1 8.3 0.0 0.0 OK
Design data
fy εlim
Material
[MPa] [%]
S 275 275.0 5.0
S 355 355.0 5.0
Overall check, LE1
142
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Strain check, LE1
143
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Equivalent stress, LE1
Bolts
Ft,Ed V Utt Fb,Rd Uts Utts
Name Grade Loads Status
[kN] [kN] [%] [kN] [%] [%]
B1 M16 8.8 - 1 LE1 2.2 2.0 2.5 68.7 5.9 5.1 OK
B2 M16 8.8 - 1 LE1 1.0 2.0 1.1 37.8 10.4 4.1 OK
B3 M16 8.8 - 2 LE1 1.0 2.1 1.1 99.1 3.5 4.3 OK
144
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
B4 M16 8.8 - 2 LE1 3.7 2.0 4.1 85.3 3.3 6.3 OK
B5 M16 8.8 - 2 LE1 1.0 2.1 1.1 99.1 3.5 4.3 OK
B6 M16 8.8 - 2 LE1 3.7 2.0 4.1 85.3 3.3 6.3 OK
Design data
Ft,Rd Bp,Rd Fv,Rd
Name
[kN] [kN] [kN]
M16 8.8 - 1 90.4 184.7 60.3
M16 8.8 - 2 90.4 116.7 60.3
Detailed result for B2
Tension resistance check (EN 1993-1-8 tab 3.4)
90.4 kN ≥ 1.0 kN
where:
– Factor
– Ultimate tensile strength of the bolt
– Tensile stress area of the bolt
– Safety factor
Punching resistance check (EN 1993-1-8 tab 3.4)
184.7 kN ≥ 1.0 kN
where:
– The mean of the across points and across flats dimensions of the
bolt head or the nut, whichever is smaller
145
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
– Thickness
– Ultimate strength
– Safety factor
Shear resistance check (EN 1993-1-8 tab 3.4)
60.3 kN ≥ 2.0 kN
where:
– Reducing factor
– Reducing factor
– Ultimate tensile strength of the bolt
– Tensile stress area of the bolt
– Safety factor
Bearing resistance check (EN 1993-1-8 tab 3.4)
37.8 kN ≥ 3.9 kN
where:
– Factor for edge distance and bolt
spacing perpendicular to the
direction of load transfer
– Factor for end distance and bolt
spacing in direction of load transfer
– Distance to the plate edge
perpendicular to the shear force
– Distance between bolts
perpendicular to the shear force
– Bolt hole diameter
– Distance to the plate edge in the
direction of the shear force
– Distance between bolts in the
direction of the shear force
– Ultimate tensile strength of the bolt
– Ultimate strength
146
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
– Nominal diameter of the fastener
– Thickness of the plate
– Safety factor
Interaction of tension and shear (EN 1993-1-8 tab 3.4)
4.1 %
Utilization in tension
1.1 %
Utilization in shear
10.4 %
Welds (Plastic redistribution)
Throa Lengt σw,Ed εPl σ⏊ τ|| τ⏊ Ut Utc
Ite Load Statu
Edge t th. h [MPa [% [MPa [MPa [MPa [% [%
m s s
[mm] [mm] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]
M2- STIFF
◢7.5◢ 98 LE1 2.9 0.0 -0.2 1.6 -0.2 0.7 0.5 OK
bfl 1 1
◢7.5◢ 98 LE1 2.9 0.0 -0.2 -1.6 0.2 0.7 0.5 OK
M2- STIFF
◢7.5◢ 181 LE1 13.3 0.0 -6.3 -2.7 -6.2 3.0 1.0 OK
w1 1
◢7.5◢ 181 LE1 13.0 0.0 -6.0 2.7 6.1 3.0 1.0 OK
M2- STIFF
◢7.5◢ 98 LE1 1.8 0.0 -0.4 0.9 -0.5 0.4 0.3 OK
tfl 1 1
◢7.5◢ 98 LE1 1.6 0.0 -0.4 -0.8 0.4 0.4 0.3 OK
Design data
βw σw,Rd 0.9 σ
[-] [MPa] [MPa]
S 355 0.90 435.6 352.8
147
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Detailed result for M2-w 1 STIFF1
Weld resistance check (EN 1993-1-8 4.5.3.2)
435. MP 13. MP
≥
6 a 3 a
352.8 MPa ≥ 6.3 MPa
where:
– Ultimate strength
– appropriate correlation factor taken from Table 4.1
– Safety factor
Stress utilization
3.0 %
Buckling
Buckling analysis was not calculated.
Bill of material
Manufacturing operations
Plates Welds Length
Name Shape Nr. Bolts Nr.
[mm] [mm] [mm]
CUT1
P10.0x98.2-181.2 (S Double fillet: a =
STIFF1 1 377.6
355) 7.5
148
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Welds
Throat thickness Leg size Length
Type Material
[mm] [mm] [mm]
Double fillet S 355 7.5 10.6 377.6
Bolts
Grip length
Name Count
[mm]
M16 8.8 26 2
M16 8.8 17 4
149
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Drawing
STIFF1
P10.0x181-98 (S 355)
150
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
M1, UC 152 x 152 x 23 - Web 1:
151
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
M2, UC 203 x 203 x 46 - Web 1:
152
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
CLEAT1 a, L80X10 - Bottom flange 1:
153
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
CLEAT1 a, L80X10 - Web 1:
154
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
CLEAT1 b, L80X10 - Bottom flange 1:
155
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
CLEAT1 b, L80X10 - Web 1:
156
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
3. PADSTONE DESIGN
PS-1 440 x 100 x 215
MASONRY BEARING DESIGN TO BS5628-1:2005
TEDDS calculation version 1.0.06
Masonry details
Masonry type; Aggregate concrete blocks (25% or less formed
voids)
Compressive strength of unit; punit = 3.6 N/mm2
Mortar designation; ii
Least horizontal dimension of masonry units; lunit = 100 mm
Height of masonry units; hunit = 215 mm
Category of masonry units; Category II
Category of construction control ; Normal
Partial safety factor for material strength; m = 3.5
Thickness of load bearing leaf; t = 100 mm
Effective thickness of masonry wall; tef = 100 mm
Height of masonry wall; h = 2400 mm
Effective height of masonry wall; hef = 2400 mm
157
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Beam to span in plane of wall
lb
B
Bearing details
Beam spanning in plane of wall
Width of bearing; B = 100 mm
Length of bearing; lb = 100 mm
Compressive strength from Table 2 BS5628:Part 1 - aggregate concrete blocks (25% or less formed
voids)
Mortar designation; Mortar = "ii"
Block compressive strength; punit = 3.6 N/mm2
Characteristic compressive strength (Table 2c); fkc = 1.70 N/mm2
Characteristic compressive strength (Table 2d); fkd = 3.50 N/mm2
Height of solid block; hunit = 215.0 mm ;
Least horizontal dimension; lunit = 100.0 mm
Block ratio; ratio = hunit / lunit = 2.2
Ratio between 0.6 and 4.5 - OK
Characteristic compressive strength; fk = 3.50 N/mm2
158
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Loading details
Characteristic concentrated dead load; Gk = 5 kN
Characteristic concentrated imposed load; Qk = 1 kN
Design concentrated load; F = (Gk 1.4) + (Qk 1.6) = 8.6 kN
Characteristic distributed dead load; gk = 0.0 kN/m
Characteristic distributed imposed load; qk = 0.0 kN/m
Design distributed load; f = (gk 1.4) + (qk 1.6) = 0.0 kN/m
Masonry bearing type
Bearing type; Type 2
Bearing safety factor; bear = 1.50
Check design bearing without a spreader
Design bearing stress; fca = F / (B lb) + f / t = 0.860 N/mm2
Allowable bearing stress; fcp = bear fk / m = 1.500 N/mm2
PASS - Allowable bearing stress exceeds design bearing stress
Check design bearing at 0.4 h below the bearing level
Slenderness ratio; hef / tef = 24.00
Eccentricity at top of wall; ex = 0.0 mm
From BS5628:1 Table 7
Capacity reduction factor; = 0.61
Length of bearing distributed at 0.4 h; ld = 1060 mm
Maximum bearing stress; fca = F / (ld t) + f / t = 0.081 N/mm2
Allowable bearing stress; fcp = fk / m = 0.605 N/mm2
PASS - Allowable bearing stress at 0.4 h below bearing level exceeds design bearing stress
159
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
4. MASONRY WALL DESIGN
Wall-1 (Cavity Wall)
MASONRY WALL PANEL DESIGN
In accordance with BS5628-1:2005
Tedds calculation version 1.2.13
Masonry panel details
Cavity wall - Unreinforced masonry wall without openings
Panel length; L = 6006 mm
Panel height; h = 2400 mm
Panel support conditions
Outer leaf; Simply supported on 4 no. sides
Inner leaf; Simply supported on 4 no. sides
Effective panel length; Lef = 1.0 L = 6006 mm
Effective panel height; hef = 1.0 h = 2400 mm
Cavity wall construction details
Outer leaf thickness; t1 = 100 mm
160
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Cavity thickness; tc = 100 mm
Inner leaf thickness; t2 = 100 mm
Effective wall thickness; tef = max(2 (t1 + t2) / 3, t1, t2) = 133 mm
Masonry outer leaf details
Masonry type; Clay bricks having a water absorption between 7%
and 12%
Compressive strength of unit; punit1 = 10.0 N/mm2
Mortar strength Class/Designation; M6 / (ii);
Height of masonry units; hb1 = 65 mm
Density of masonry; 1 = 18.0 kN/m3
From BS5628-1 Table 2a - Characteristic compressive strength of masonry
Characteristic compressive strength; fk1 = 3.80 N/mm2
From BS5628-1 Table 3 - Characteristic flexural strength of masonry
Plane of failure parallel to bed joints; fkx_para1 = 0.40 N/mm2
Plane of failure perpendicular to bed joints; fkx_perp1 = 1.10 N/mm2
Masonry inner leaf details
Masonry type; Aggregate concrete blocks with no voids
161
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Compressive strength of unit; punit2 = 7.3 N/mm2
Mortar strength Class/Designation; M6 / (ii);
Height of masonry units; hb2 = 215 mm
Density of masonry; 2 = 18.0 kN/m3
Least horizontal dimension of masonry units; tmin2 = 100 mm
Ratio of height to least horizontal dimension; hb2 / tmin2 = 2.15
From BS5628-1 Table 2d - Characteristic compressive strength of masonry
Characteristic compressive strength; fk2 = 6.40 N/mm2
From BS5628-1 Table 3 - Characteristic flexural strength of masonry
Plane of failure parallel to bed joints; fkx_para2 = 0.25 N/mm2
Plane of failure perpendicular to bed joints; fkx_perp2 = 0.60 N/mm2
Lateral loading details
Characteristic wind load on panel; W k = 0.700 kN/m2
Vertical loading details
Dead load on top of outer leaf; Gk1 = 15 kN/m;
Dead load on top of inner leaf; Gk2 = 15 kN/m;
Imposed load on top of outer leaf; Qk1 = 2 kN/m;
Imposed load on top of inner leaf; Qk2 = 2 kN/m;
Partial safety factors for material strength
Category of manufacturing control; Category II
Category of construction control; Normal
Partial safety factor for masonry in compression; mc = 3.50
Partial safety factor for masonry in flexure; mf = 3.00
Partial safety factor for masonry in shear; mv = 2.50
Slenderness ratio (cl 24.1)
Allowable slenderness ratio; SRall = 27
Slenderness ratio; SR = min(hef, Lef) / tef = 18.0
PASS - Slenderness ratio is less than maximum allowable
Vertical loading (cl 28)
Partial safety factors for design loads
Partial safety factor for design dead load; fG = 1.40
Partial safety factor for design imposed load; fQ = 1.60
162
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Considering outer leaf at top of wall
Design vertical load on wall; Fv1 = Gk1 fG + Qk1 fQ = 24.2 kN/m
Design vertical load stress on wall; fv1 = Fv1 / t1 = 0.242 N/mm2
Design bending moment; Mv1 = Gk1 fG eG1 + Qk1 fQ eQ1 = 0.0 kNm/m
Resultant eccentricity at the top of the wall; ex1 = Mv1 / Fv1 = 0 mm
From BS5628-1 Table 7 - Capacity reduction factor
Capacity reduction factor; 1 = 0.84
Allowable stress capacity; fcap1 = 1 fk1 / mc= 0.908 N/mm2
PASS - Allowable stress capacity exceeds design vertical load stress on wall
Considering inner leaf at top of wall
Design vertical load on wall; Fv2 = Gk2 fG + Qk2 fQ = 24.2 kN/m
Design vertical load stress on wall; fv2 = Fv2 / t2 = 0.242 N/mm2
Design bending moment; Mv2 = Gk2 fG eG2 + Qk2 fQ eQ2 = 0.0 kNm/m
Resultant eccentricity at the top of the wall; ex2 = Mv2 / Fv2 = 0 mm
From BS5628-1 Table 7 - Capacity reduction factor
Capacity reduction factor; 2 = 0.84
Allowable stress capacity; fcap2 = 2 fk2 / mc= 1.529 N/mm2
PASS - Allowable stress capacity exceeds design vertical load stress on wall
Horizontal loading (cl 32)
Limiting dimensions (cl 32.3)
Area of panel; Ap = h L = 14.4 m2
Limiting area of panel; Amax = 2025 tef2 = 36.0 m2
PASS - Area of panel does not exceed limiting area of panel
Limiting panel dimension; Lmax = 50 tef = 6667 mm
PASS - Limiting panel dimension is not exceeded
Partial safety factors for design loads
Partial safety factor for design wind load; fW = 1.40
Partial safety factor for design dead load; fG = 0.90
Design moments of resistance in panels (cl 32.4.2)
Considering outer leaf
Design vertical compressive stress; gd1 = fG Gk1 / t1 = 0.14 N/mm2
Enhanced flexural strength of masonry; fka_para1 = fkx_para1 + mf gd1 = 0.81 N/mm2
Section modulus of wall; Z1 = t12 / 6 = 1666667 mm3/m
163
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Elastic design moment of resistance; Md1 = fkx_perp1 Z1 / mf = 0.611 kNm/m
Considering inner leaf
Design vertical compressive stress; gd2 = fG Gk2 / t2 = 0.14 N/mm2
Enhanced flexural strength of masonry; fka_para2 = fkx_para2 + mf gd2 = 0.66 N/mm2
Section modulus of wall; Z2 = t22 / 6 = 1666667 mm3/m
Elastic design moment of resistance; Md2 = fkx_perp2 Z2 / mf = 0.333 kNm/m
Calculate design wind load acting on each leaf
Outer leaf design wind load; W k1 = Md1 W k / (Md1 + Md2) = 0.453 kN/m2
Inner leaf design wind load; W k2 = Md2 W k / (Md1 + Md2) = 0.247 kN/m2
Design moment in panels (cl 32.4.2)
Considering outer leaf
Orthogonal strength ratio; 1 = fka_para1 / fkx_perp1 = 0.73
Using yield line analysis to calculate bending moment coefficient
Bending moment coefficient; 1 = 0.016
Design moment in wall; M1 = 1 W k1 fW L2 = 0.358 kNm/m
PASS - Resistance moment exceeds design moment
Considering inner leaf
Orthogonal strength ratio; 2 = fka_para2 / fkx_perp2 = 1.09
Using yield line analysis to calculate bending moment coefficient
Bending moment coefficient; 2 = 0.011
Design moment in wall; M2 = 2 W k2 fW L2 = 0.141 kNm/m
PASS - Resistance moment exceeds design moment
164
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
5. FOUNDATION DESIGN
Strip Footing-1 (Eccentric)
STRIP FOOTING ANALYSIS AND DESIGN (BS8110-1:1997)
Tedds calculation version 2.0.07
Strip footing details
Width of strip footing; B = 600 mm
Depth of strip footing; h = 800 mm
Depth of soil over strip footing; hsoil = 200 mm
Density of concrete; conc = 23.6 kN/m3
Load details
Load width; b = 300 mm
165
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Load eccentricity; eP = -150 mm
Soil details
Density of soil; soil = 20.0 kN/m3
Design shear strength; ’ = 25.0 deg
Design base friction; = 19.3 deg
Allowable bearing pressure; Pbearing = 150 kN/m2
Axial loading on strip footing
Dead axial load; PG = 20.0 kN/m
Imposed axial load; PQ = 2.0 kN/m
Wind axial load; PW = 0.0 kN/m
Total axial load; P = 22.0 kN/m
Foundation loads
Dead surcharge load; FGsur = 11.000 kN/m2
Imposed surcharge load; FQsur = 1.000 kN/m2
Strip footing self weight; Fswt = h conc = 18.880 kN/m2
Soil self weight; Fsoil = hsoil soil = 4.000 kN/m2
Total foundation load; F = B (FGsur + FQsur + Fswt + Fsoil) = 20.9 kN/m
Calculate base reaction
Total base reaction; T = F + P = 42.9 kN/m
Eccentricity of base reaction in x; eT = (P eP + M + H h) / T = -77 mm
Base reaction acts within middle third of base
Calculate base pressures
q1 = (T / B) (1 - 6 eT / B) = 126.547 kN/m2
q2 = (T / B) (1 + 6 eT / B) = 16.547 kN/m2
Minimum base pressure; qmin = min(q1, q2) = 16.547 kN/m2
Maximum base pressure; qmax = max(q1, q2) = 126.547 kN/m2
PASS - Maximum base pressure is less than allowable bearing pressure
Partial safety factors for loads
Partial safety factor for dead loads; fG = 1.40
Partial safety factor for imposed loads; fQ = 1.60
Partial safety factor for wind loads; fW = 0.00
Ultimate axial loading
Ultimate axial loading; Pu = PG fG + PQ fQ + PW fW = 31.2 kN/m
166
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Ultimate foundation loading
Ultimate foundation loading; Fu = B [(FGsur + Fswt + Fsoil) fG + FQsur fQ] = 29.4
kN/m
Ultimate horizontal loading
Ultimate horizontal loading; Hu = HG fG + HQ fQ + HW fW = 0.0 kN/m
Ultimate moment on foundation
Ultimate moment; Mu = MG fG + MQ fQ + MW fW = 0.000 kNm/m
Calculate ultimate base reaction
Ultimate base reaction; Tu = Fu + Pu = 60.6 kN/m
Eccentricity of ultimate base reaction; eTu = (Pu eP + Mu + Hu h) / Tu = -77 mm
Calculate ultimate pad base pressures
q1u = (Tu / B) (1 - 6 eTu / B) = 179.032 kN/m2
q2u = (Tu / B) (1 + 6 eTu / B) = 23.032 kN/m2
Minimum ultimate base pressure; qminu = min(q1u, q2u) = 23.032 kN/m2
Maximum ultimate base pressure; qmaxu = max(q1u, q2u) = 179.032 kN/m2
Calculate base lengths
Left hand length; BL = B / 2 + eP = 150 mm
Right hand length; BR = B / 2 - eP = 450 mm
Calculate rate of change of base pressure
Length of base reaction; Bx = B = 600 mm
Rate of change of base pressure; Cx = (q2u - q1u) / Bx = -260.000 kN/m2/m
Calculate ultimate moment
Ultimate moment; Mx = (q1u-Fu/B)BL2/2+CxBL3/6 = 1.316 kNm/m
Material details
Characteristic strength of concrete; fcu = 30 N/mm2
Characteristic strength of reinforcement; fy = 500 N/mm2
Characteristic strength of shear reinforcement; fyv = 500 N/mm2
Nominal cover to reinforcement; cnom = 30 mm
Moment design
Diameter of tension reinforcement; B = 16 mm
Depth of tension reinforcement; d = h - cnom - B / 2 = 762 mm
167
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Design formula for rectangular beams (cl 3.4.4.4)
K = Mx / (d2 fcu) = 0.000
K’ = 0.156
K < K' compression reinforcement is not required
Lever arm; z = d min([0.5 + (0.25 - K / 0.9)], 0.95) = 724 mm
Area of tension reinforcement required; As_req = Mx / (0.87 fy z) = 4 mm2/m
Minimum area of tension reinforcement; As_min = 0.0013 h = 1040 mm2/m
Tension reinforcement provided; 16 dia. bars @ 175 centres bottom
Area of tension reinforcement provided; As_B_prov = B2 / (4 sB) = 1149 mm2/m
PASS - Tension reinforcement provided exceeds tension reinforcement required
Calculate ultimate shear force at distance d from face of wall
Ultimate shear force at face of load; Vsu = (q1u - Fu / B) (BL - b / 2 - d) - Cx (BL - b / 2 - d)2 /
2 = -23.576 kN/m
Shear stresses at distance d from face of wall (cl 3.5.5.2)
Design shear stress; vsu = Vsu / d = -0.031 N/mm2
From BS 8110:Part 1:1997 - Table 3.8
Design concrete shear stress; vc = 0.304 N/mm2
Allowable design shear stress; vmax = min(0.8N/mm2 (fcu / 1 N/mm2), 5 N/mm2) =
4.382 N/mm2
PASS - vsu < vc - No shear reinforcement required
16 dia. bars @ 175 c/c btm
168
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Strip Footing-2 (Centric)
STRIP FOOTING ANALYSIS AND DESIGN (BS8110-1:1997)
Tedds calculation version 2.0.07
Strip footing details
Width of strip footing; B = 600 mm
Depth of strip footing; h = 800 mm
Depth of soil over strip footing; hsoil = 200 mm
Density of concrete; conc = 23.6 kN/m3
Load details
Load width; b = 300 mm
Load eccentricity; eP = 0 mm
169
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Soil details
Density of soil; soil = 20.0 kN/m3
Design shear strength; ’ = 25.0 deg
Design base friction; = 19.3 deg
Allowable bearing pressure; Pbearing = 150 kN/m2
Axial loading on strip footing
Dead axial load; PG = 18.0 kN/m
Imposed axial load; PQ = 2.0 kN/m
Wind axial load; PW = 0.0 kN/m
Total axial load; P = 20.0 kN/m
Foundation loads
Dead surcharge load; FGsur = 11.000 kN/m2
Imposed surcharge load; FQsur = 1.000 kN/m2
Strip footing self weight; Fswt = h conc = 18.880 kN/m2
Soil self weight; Fsoil = hsoil soil = 4.000 kN/m2
Total foundation load; F = B (FGsur + FQsur + Fswt + Fsoil) = 20.9 kN/m
Calculate base reaction
Total base reaction; T = F + P = 40.9 kN/m
Eccentricity of base reaction in x; eT = (P eP + M + H h) / T = 0 mm
Base reaction acts within middle third of base
Calculate base pressures
q1 = (T / B) (1 - 6 eT / B) = 68.213 kN/m2
q2 = (T / B) (1 + 6 eT / B) = 68.213 kN/m2
Minimum base pressure; qmin = min(q1, q2) = 68.213 kN/m2
Maximum base pressure; qmax = max(q1, q2) = 68.213 kN/m2
PASS - Maximum base pressure is less than allowable bearing pressure
Partial safety factors for loads
Partial safety factor for dead loads; fG = 1.40
Partial safety factor for imposed loads; fQ = 1.60
Partial safety factor for wind loads; fW = 0.00
Ultimate axial loading
Ultimate axial loading; Pu = PG fG + PQ fQ + PW fW = 28.4 kN/m
170
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Ultimate foundation loading
Ultimate foundation loading; Fu = B [(FGsur + Fswt + Fsoil) fG + FQsur fQ] = 29.4
kN/m
Ultimate horizontal loading
Ultimate horizontal loading; Hu = HG fG + HQ fQ + HW fW = 0.0 kN/m
Ultimate moment on foundation
Ultimate moment; Mu = MG fG + MQ fQ + MW fW = 0.000 kNm/m
Calculate ultimate base reaction
Ultimate base reaction; Tu = Fu + Pu = 57.8 kN/m
Eccentricity of ultimate base reaction; eTu = (Pu eP + Mu + Hu h) / Tu = 0 mm
Calculate ultimate pad base pressures
q1u = (Tu / B) (1 - 6 eTu / B) = 96.365 kN/m2
q2u = (Tu / B) (1 + 6 eTu / B) = 96.365 kN/m2
Minimum ultimate base pressure; qminu = min(q1u, q2u) = 96.365 kN/m2
Maximum ultimate base pressure; qmaxu = max(q1u, q2u) = 96.365 kN/m2
Calculate base lengths
Left hand length; BL = B / 2 + eP = 300 mm
Right hand length; BR = B / 2 - eP = 300 mm
Calculate rate of change of base pressure
Length of base reaction; Bx = B = 600 mm
Rate of change of base pressure; Cx = (q2u - q1u) / Bx = 0.000 kN/m2/m
Calculate ultimate moment
Ultimate moment; Mx = (q1u-Fu/B)BL2/2+CxBL3/6 = 2.130 kNm/m
Material details
Characteristic strength of concrete; fcu = 30 N/mm2
Characteristic strength of reinforcement; fy = 500 N/mm2
Characteristic strength of shear reinforcement; fyv = 500 N/mm2
Nominal cover to reinforcement; cnom = 30 mm
Moment design
Diameter of tension reinforcement; B = 16 mm
Depth of tension reinforcement; d = h - cnom - B / 2 = 762 mm
171
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Design formula for rectangular beams (cl 3.4.4.4)
K = Mx / (d2 fcu) = 0.000
K’ = 0.156
K < K' compression reinforcement is not required
Lever arm; z = d min([0.5 + (0.25 - K / 0.9)], 0.95) = 724 mm
Area of tension reinforcement required; As_req = Mx / (0.87 fy z) = 7 mm2/m
Minimum area of tension reinforcement; As_min = 0.0013 h = 1040 mm2/m
Tension reinforcement provided; 16 dia. bars @ 175 centres bottom
Area of tension reinforcement provided; As_B_prov = B2 / (4 sB) = 1149 mm2/m
PASS - Tension reinforcement provided exceeds tension reinforcement required
Calculate ultimate shear force at distance d from face of wall
Ultimate shear force at face of load; Vsu = (q1u - Fu / B) (BL - b / 2 - d) - Cx (BL - b / 2 - d)2 /
2 = -28.968 kN/m
Shear stresses at distance d from face of wall (cl 3.5.5.2)
Design shear stress; vsu = Vsu / d = -0.038 N/mm2
From BS 8110:Part 1:1997 - Table 3.8
Design concrete shear stress; vc = 0.304 N/mm2
Allowable design shear stress; vmax = min(0.8N/mm2 (fcu / 1 N/mm2), 5 N/mm2) =
4.382 N/mm2
PASS - vsu < vc - No shear reinforcement required
16 dia. bars @ 175 c/c btm
172
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
7. TIMBER DESIGN
Flat Roof Joist 47X150 @400 C/C (C-24)
TIMBER JOIST DESIGN (BS5268-2:2002)
Tedds calculation version 1.1.04
Joist details
Joist breadth; b = 47 mm
Joist depth; h = 150 mm
Joist spacing; s = 400 mm
Timber strength class; C24
Service class of timber; 1
Span details
Number of spans; Nspan = 1
Length of bearing; Lb = 100 mm
Effective length of span; Ls1 = 3282 mm
173
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
47
100
Section properties
Second moment of area; I = b h3 / 12 = 13218750 mm4
Section modulus; Z = b h2 / 6 = 176250 mm3
Loading details
Joist self weight; Fswt = b h char gacc = 0.02 kN/m
Dead load; Fd_udl = 0.75 kN/m2
Imposed UDL(Medium term); Fi_udl = 0.60 kN/m2
Imposed point load (Short term); Fi_pt = 0.90 kN
Modification factors
Service class for bending parallel to grain; K2m = 1.00
Service class for compression; K2c = 1.00
Service class for shear parallel to grain; K2s = 1.00
Service class for modulus of elasticity; K2e = 1.00
Section depth factor; K7 = 1.08
Load sharing factor; K8 = 1.10
Consider medium term loads
Load duration factor; K3 = 1.25
Maximum bending moment; M = 0.760 kNm
Maximum shear force; V = 0.926 kN
Maximum support reaction; R = 0.926 kN
Maximum deflection; = 6.162 mm
174
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Check bending stress
Bending stress; m = 7.500 N/mm2
Permissible bending stress; m_adm = m K2m K3 K7 K8 = 11.130 N/mm2
Applied bending stress; m_max = M / Z = 4.310 N/mm2
PASS - Applied bending stress within permissible limits
Check shear stress
Shear stress; = 0.710 N/mm2
Permissible shear stress; adm = K2s K3 K8 = 0.976 N/mm2
Applied shear stress; max = 3 V / (2 b h) = 0.197 N/mm2
PASS - Applied shear stress within permissible limits
Check bearing stress
Compression perpendicular to grain (no wane); cp1 = 2.400 N/mm2
Permissible bearing stress; c_adm = cp1 K2c K3 K8 = 3.300 N/mm2
Applied bearing stress; c_max = R / (b Lb) = 0.197 N/mm2
PASS - Applied bearing stress within permissible limits
Check deflection
Permissible deflection; adm = min(Ls1 0.003, 14 mm) = 9.846 mm
Bending deflection (based on E mean); bending = 5.970 mm
Shear deflection; shear = 0.192 mm
Total deflection; = bending + shear = 6.162 mm
PASS - Actual deflection within permissible limits
Consider short term loads
Load duration factor; K3 = 1.50
Maximum bending moment; M = 1.175 kNm
Maximum shear force; V = 1.432 kN
Maximum support reaction; R = 1.432 kN
Maximum deflection; = 8.370 mm
Check bending stress
Bending stress; m = 7.500 N/mm2
Permissible bending stress; m_adm = m K2m K3 K7 K8 = 13.355 N/mm2
Applied bending stress; m_max = M / Z = 6.666 N/mm2
PASS - Applied bending stress within permissible limits
175
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Check shear stress
Shear stress; = 0.710 N/mm2
Permissible shear stress; adm = K2s K3 K8 = 1.172 N/mm2
Applied shear stress; max = 3 V / (2 b h) = 0.305 N/mm2
PASS - Applied shear stress within permissible limits
Check bearing stress
Compression perpendicular to grain (no wane); cp1 = 2.400 N/mm2
Permissible bearing stress; c_adm = cp1 K2c K3 K8 = 3.960 N/mm2
Applied bearing stress; c_max = R / (b Lb) = 0.305 N/mm2
PASS - Applied bearing stress within permissible limits
Check deflection
Permissible deflection; adm = min(Ls1 0.003, 14 mm) = 9.846 mm
Bending deflection (based on E mean); bending = 8.074 mm
Shear deflection; shear = 0.296 mm
Total deflection; = bending + shear = 8.370 mm
PASS - Actual deflection within permissible limits
176
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Stud wall 47X150 @400 C/C (C-24)
TIMBER STUD DESIGN (BS5268-2:2002)
TEDDS calculation version 1.0.05
U kN/m
b
L
Ls
ss
b h
Stud details
Stud breadth; b = 47 mm
Stud depth; h = 150 mm
Number of studs; Ns = 1
Strength class C24 timber (Table 8 BS5268:Pt 2:2002)
Section properties
Cross sectional area; A = Ns b h = 7050 mm2
Section modulus; Z = Ns b h2 / 6 = 176250 mm3
Moment of inertia in the major axis; Ix = Ns b h3 / 12 = 13218750 mm4
Moment of inertia in the minor axis; Iy = Ns h b3 / 12 = 1297787 mm4
177
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Radius of gyration in the major axis; rx = (Ix / A) = 43.3 mm
Radius of gyration in the minor axis; ry = (Iy / A) = 13.6 mm
Panel details - Studs restrained by sheathing in the plane of the panel
Panel height; L = 2400 mm
Stud length; Ls = L – (2 b) = 2306 mm
Standard stud spacing; ss = 400 mm
Panel opening; O = 0 mm
Loaded panel length; s = max(ss, (O + ss) / 2) = 400 mm
Effective length in the major axis; Lex = 0.85 Ls = 1960 mm
Slenderness ratio; = Lex / rx = 45.27
Vertical loading details Dead loads Imposed loads
Roof UDL; Ur_d = 1.00 kN/m; Ur_i = 0.00 kN/m
Modification factors
Section depth factor; K7 = (300 mm / h)0.11 = 1.08
Load sharing factor; K8 = 1.10
Consider axial compression without bending under medium term loads
Load duration factor; K3 = 1.25
Vertical loading; F = (Ur_d) s = 0.40 kN
Check compressive stress on stud
Compression member factor; K12 = 0.75
Compression parallel to grain; c = 7.900 N/mm2
Permissible compressive stress; c_adm = c K3 K8 K12 = 8.149 N/mm2
Applied compressive stress; c_max = F / (Ns b h) = 0.057 N/mm2
PASS - Applied compressive stress under medium term loads is within permissible limits
Check compressive stress on rail
Bearing stress modification factor; K4 = 1.24
Compression perpendicular to grain (no wane); cp1 = 2.400 N/mm2
Permissible compressive stress; cp1_adm = cp1 K3 K4 = 3.717 N/mm2
Applied compressive stress; cp1_max = F / (Ns b h) = 0.057 N/mm2
PASS - Applied compressive stress under medium term loads is within permissible limits
178
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Double Header (2)47X150 (C-24)
TIMBER BEAM ANALYSIS & DESIGN TO BS5268-2:2002
TEDDS calculation version 1.7.01
mm 2260
A 1 B
Unfactored Loads Self weight included
Dead Imposed
0.500
0.0
mm 2260
A 1 B
Load Envelope - Combina on 1
1.581
0.0
mm 2260
A 1 B
179
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Load Combina on 1 (shown in propor on)
Imposed
Dead
mm 2260
A 1 B
Bending Moment Envelope
kNm
0.0
1.010
1.0
mm 2260
A 1 B
Shear Force Envelope
kN
1.8
1.787
0.0
-1.787
-1.8
mm 2260
A 1 B
Applied loading
Beam loads
Dead full UDL 0.500 kN/m
Imposed full UDL 0.500 kN/m
Dead self weight of beam 1
Load combinations
Load combination 1 Support A Dead 1.40
Imposed 1.60
180
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Span 1 Dead 1.40
Imposed 1.60
Support B Dead 1.40
Imposed 1.60
Analysis results
Maximum moment; Mmax = 1.010 kNm; Mmin = 0.000 kNm
Design moment; M = max(abs(Mmax),abs(Mmin)) = 1.010 kNm
Maximum shear; Fmax = 1.787 kN; Fmin = -1.787 kN
Design shear; F = max(abs(Fmax),abs(Fmin)) = 1.787 kN
Total load on beam; W tot = 3.574 kN
Reactions at support A; RA_max = 1.787 kN; RA_min = 1.787 kN
Unfactored dead load reaction at support A; RA_Dead = 0.631 kN
Unfactored imposed load reaction at support A; RA_Imposed = 0.565 kN
Reactions at support B; RB_max = 1.787 kN; RB_min = 1.787 kN
Unfactored dead load reaction at support B; RB_Dead = 0.631 kN
Unfactored imposed load reaction at support B; RB_Imposed = 0.565 kN
150
Timber section details
Breadth of sections; b = 47 mm
Depth of sections; h = 150 mm
Number of sections in member; N=2
Overall breadth of member; bb = N b = 94 mm
Timber strength class; C24
Member details
Service class of timber; 1
Load duration; Long term
Length of span; Ls1 = 2260 mm
Length of bearing; Lb = 100 mm
181
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Section properties
Cross sectional area of member; A = N b h = 14100 mm2
Section modulus; Zx = N b h2 / 6 = 352500 mm3
Zy = h (N b)2 / 6 = 220900 mm3
Second moment of area; Ix = N b h3 / 12 = 26437500 mm4
Iy = h (N b)3 / 12 = 10382300 mm4
Radius of gyration; ix = (Ix / A) = 43.3 mm
iy = (Iy / A) = 27.1 mm
Modification factors
Duration of loading - Table 17; K3 = 1.00
Bearing stress - Table 18; K4 = 1.00
Total depth of member - cl.2.10.6; K7 = (300 mm / h)0.11 = 1.08
Load sharing - cl.2.9; K8 = 1.00
Lateral support - cl.2.10.8
No lateral support
Permissible depth-to-breadth ratio - Table 19; 2.00
Actual depth-to-breadth ratio; h / (N b) = 1.60
PASS - Lateral support is adequate
Compression perpendicular to grain
Permissible bearing stress (no wane); c_adm = cp1 K3 K4 K8 = 2.400 N/mm2
Applied bearing stress; c_a = RA_max / (N b Lb) = 0.190 N/mm2
c_a / c_adm = 0.079
PASS - Applied compressive stress is less than permissible compressive stress at bearing
Bending parallel to grain
Permissible bending stress; m_adm = m K3 K7 K8 = 8.094 N/mm2
Applied bending stress; m_a = M / Zx = 2.864 N/mm2
m_a / m_adm = 0.354
PASS - Applied bending stress is less than permissible bending stress
Shear parallel to grain
Permissible shear stress; adm = K3 K8 = 0.710 N/mm2
Applied shear stress; a = 3 F / (2 A) = 0.190 N/mm2
a / adm = 0.268
PASS - Applied shear stress is less than permissible shear stress
182
Client:
Prepared by:
Roy shaw
EH
Address:
33 Yorkshire Gardens, London N18 2LD, UK
Date:
Project Ref:
Nov 2024
2023-220
Deflection
Modulus of elasticity for deflection; E = Emin = 7200 N/mm2
Permissible deflection; adm = min(0.551 in, 0.003 Ls1) = 6.780 mm
Bending deflection; b_s1 = 1.888 mm
Shear deflection; v_s1 = 0.128 mm
Total deflection; a = b_s1 + v_s1 = 2.016 mm
a / adm = 0.297
PASS - Total deflection is less than permissible deflection
183
You might also like
- PET Bottle Crusher With Bottleneck and Base Cutter Engr. Aldrin Bernardo 1No ratings yetPET Bottle Crusher With Bottleneck and Base Cutter Engr. Aldrin Bernardo 184 pages
- Structural Calculation: Client Name Emily PriceNo ratings yetStructural Calculation: Client Name Emily Price40 pages
- STR - RPT - Mr. Paul - Chapell - 10 - Hawksdale - CL - Grantham - NG31 - 8EGNo ratings yetSTR - RPT - Mr. Paul - Chapell - 10 - Hawksdale - CL - Grantham - NG31 - 8EG77 pages
- Str. - Rpt. - Adam - Meadowbank - 22 Tuckey Grove - Ripley, - GU23 6JGNo ratings yetStr. - Rpt. - Adam - Meadowbank - 22 Tuckey Grove - Ripley, - GU23 6JG31 pages
- STR. RPT. Maureen 80 Talbot Road, Luton LU2 7RWNo ratings yetSTR. RPT. Maureen 80 Talbot Road, Luton LU2 7RW205 pages
- MS-22-PR-396 - CHEYYAR SEZ DEVELOPERS - RM WAREHOUSE-B4 - LOAD CALCULATION SHEET - R00 - 17-08-2022 - FinalNo ratings yetMS-22-PR-396 - CHEYYAR SEZ DEVELOPERS - RM WAREHOUSE-B4 - LOAD CALCULATION SHEET - R00 - 17-08-2022 - Final11 pages
- Structural Steel Beam Calculations For Loft Conversion ExampleNo ratings yetStructural Steel Beam Calculations For Loft Conversion Example4 pages
- Internship Project 2: Tekla Structural Designer (TSD)No ratings yetInternship Project 2: Tekla Structural Designer (TSD)63 pages
- Design Report For Proposed 3storied ResidentialbuildingNo ratings yetDesign Report For Proposed 3storied Residentialbuilding35 pages
- New Beams & Trimmers: Proposed Second Floor Plan Showing Roof Support Structure AboveNo ratings yetNew Beams & Trimmers: Proposed Second Floor Plan Showing Roof Support Structure Above1 page
- 17-528.02.C03 Plans and Structural Details (A1)No ratings yet17-528.02.C03 Plans and Structural Details (A1)1 page
- Prefabricated Trusses - Product InformationNo ratings yetPrefabricated Trusses - Product Information4 pages
- GreenSpan Mall - Structural Report - R1No ratings yetGreenSpan Mall - Structural Report - R119 pages
- Design of Single Storey RCC Framed BuildingNo ratings yetDesign of Single Storey RCC Framed Building88 pages
- Background Information: Presentation: Very Good 90% Proposal Content: Great 100% Technical Data: Average 100% Total: 100%No ratings yetBackground Information: Presentation: Very Good 90% Proposal Content: Great 100% Technical Data: Average 100% Total: 100%12 pages
- Technical (Supply) Offer-Building 1 (SHED-1)No ratings yetTechnical (Supply) Offer-Building 1 (SHED-1)19 pages
- Structural Details CBC Classroom and IrcNo ratings yetStructural Details CBC Classroom and Irc2 pages
- Group 10 - S2 - Structural Steel & Timber DesignNo ratings yetGroup 10 - S2 - Structural Steel & Timber Design56 pages
- JME Consultants: Project Name Project NumberNo ratings yetJME Consultants: Project Name Project Number4 pages
- Bridge Design Guide For Temporary Works 1990 PT 2No ratings yetBridge Design Guide For Temporary Works 1990 PT 23 pages
- Adel ELsayed Ghoraba .... Calculation Sheet PDF100% (1)Adel ELsayed Ghoraba .... Calculation Sheet PDF194 pages
- EG-122 Exam (50%) Preliminary Sizing and Sustainability Considerations of A New SchoolNo ratings yetEG-122 Exam (50%) Preliminary Sizing and Sustainability Considerations of A New School7 pages
- Design Assignment Brief - Assessment Tasks 2 and 3-1No ratings yetDesign Assignment Brief - Assessment Tasks 2 and 3-13 pages
- California Infrastructure Projects: Legal Aspects of Building in the Golden StateFrom EverandCalifornia Infrastructure Projects: Legal Aspects of Building in the Golden StateNo ratings yet
- Welding Terminology: A Guide to MIG, TIG, Stick, Gas, and Spot Welding TermsFrom EverandWelding Terminology: A Guide to MIG, TIG, Stick, Gas, and Spot Welding TermsNo ratings yet
- Di1 (Si210) Elevator /: Trouble ShootingNo ratings yetDi1 (Si210) Elevator /: Trouble Shooting7 pages
- 248343322-30GXR170-640-Compressor-Carrier-Chiller. Parts PDFNo ratings yet248343322-30GXR170-640-Compressor-Carrier-Chiller. Parts PDF34 pages
- 03-03-MSDS - BÜFA®-Accelerator Co 1 2013-01-01No ratings yet03-03-MSDS - BÜFA®-Accelerator Co 1 2013-01-0110 pages
- Wireless Broadband Networks: Assoc - Dr.Ibrahim Khider Eltahir November 2015No ratings yetWireless Broadband Networks: Assoc - Dr.Ibrahim Khider Eltahir November 201566 pages
- Ceramic Flat Membrane MBR Technology For Treating HighNo ratings yetCeramic Flat Membrane MBR Technology For Treating High7 pages
- Arthrex Passport Button Cannula: Maximize Visibility and Maneuverability Inside and Outside of The Arthroscopic WorkspaceNo ratings yetArthrex Passport Button Cannula: Maximize Visibility and Maneuverability Inside and Outside of The Arthroscopic Workspace6 pages
- Continuous CT Option: Site Planning GuideNo ratings yetContinuous CT Option: Site Planning Guide20 pages
- Short Duration Current Impulse Waveform Effects On The Degradation and Energy Absorption Capability of Zinc Oxide VaristorsNo ratings yetShort Duration Current Impulse Waveform Effects On The Degradation and Energy Absorption Capability of Zinc Oxide Varistors9 pages
- Incidencia de Cáncer y Tasas de Mortalidad en Localidades Rurales Argentinas Rodeadas de Tierras Agrícolas Tratadas Con PlaguicidasNo ratings yetIncidencia de Cáncer y Tasas de Mortalidad en Localidades Rurales Argentinas Rodeadas de Tierras Agrícolas Tratadas Con Plaguicidas5 pages
- Comparitive Anatomy of Digestive System in VertebratesNo ratings yetComparitive Anatomy of Digestive System in Vertebrates36 pages
- Diagnostic Test 33 Introductory There Ans ItNo ratings yetDiagnostic Test 33 Introductory There Ans It1 page
