Chapter 3 outlines the meaning and significance of learning outcomes, emphasizing their role in defining the knowledge, skills, and values students should demonstrate post-lesson. It details the sources of these outcomes, including educational policies and industry needs, and highlights the characteristics of effective learning outcomes, which should be learner-centered, aligned with institutional goals, and relevant to current trends. Additionally, the chapter discusses the importance of clear and specific learning outcomes for guiding both teaching and student expectations.
Chapter 3 outlines the meaning and significance of learning outcomes, emphasizing their role in defining the knowledge, skills, and values students should demonstrate post-lesson. It details the sources of these outcomes, including educational policies and industry needs, and highlights the characteristics of effective learning outcomes, which should be learner-centered, aligned with institutional goals, and relevant to current trends. Additionally, the chapter discusses the importance of clear and specific learning outcomes for guiding both teaching and student expectations.
2. State the sources of learning outcomes; 3. Explain why learning outcomes must consider needs of industry; 4. Explain the characteristics of good learning outcomes; and 5. Determine whether a given learning outcome is good or not and improve on learning outcomes that do not meet standards. Meaning of learning Outcomes
-Learning outcomes are the knowledge, skills and values that
students are expected to demonstrate at the end of the lesson.
-Teaching objectives are not synonymous to the learning outcomes.
Teaching objectives are teacher-centered while learning outcomes are learner-centered. Teaching objectives state what the teacher does while learning outcomes state what learners are expected to do. SOURCES OF LEARNING OUTCOMES
Learning outcomes are derived from the following:
-vision and mission statements of educational institutions; -policies, outcomes and competencies issued by the DepEd such as the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (PPST); -program outcomes for teacher education issued by the Commission on Higher Education (CHED); -Table of Specification for the Licensure Examination for Teachers from the Professional Regulatory Board for Professional Teachers; -the competency standards from the Technical Education Skills Development Authority (TESDA); SOURCES OF LEARNING OUTCOMES
Learning outcomes are derived from the following:
-national and regional development goals and framework like the Philippine Qualifications Reference Framework (PQRF); and -international trends like the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, ASEAN Qualifications Reference Framework (AQRF); and needs of industry. SOURCES OF LEARNING OUTCOMES PROGRAM OUTCOMES for Teacher Education based on the CMOs
Based on CMOs 74-80 s.2017, The Policies, Standards and
Guidelines for the teacher education program, graduates of all programs in all types of schools (professional institution, college or university) have the ability to:
(Refer sample to the syllabus in Prof. Ed 8)
The Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers PPST
The 7 Domains and 37 strands of the PPST are in Appendix A.
Learning Outcomes in teacher education subjects must take into consideration the program outcomes laid down by CHED and the PPST issued by the DepEd. In summary, when teacher formulates his/her learning outcomes, he/she takes into consideration the institutional outcomes, the program outcomes from the CHED, the PPST and the DepEd vision and mission statements since DepEd is the main employer of teacher education graduates. The 7 Domains of PPST The Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers PPST
TEACHER QUALITY IN THE PHILIPPINES: The Philippine
Professional Standards for Teachers defines teacher quality in the Philippines. The standards describe the expectations of teachers’ increasing levels of knowledge, practice and professional engagement. At the same time, the standards allow for teachers’ growing understanding, applied with increasing sophistication across a broader and more complex range of teaching/learning situations. The following describes the breadth of 7 Domains that are required by teachers to be effective in the 21st Century in the Philippines. Quality teachers in the Philippines need to possess the following characteristics: The Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers PPST
• recognize the importance of mastery of content knowledge and its
interconnectedness within and across curriculum areas, coupled with a sound and critical understanding of the application of theories and principles of teaching and learning. • provide learning environments that are safe, secure, fair and supportive in order to promote learner responsibility and achievement. • establish learning environments that are responsive to learner diversity. They respect learners’ diverse characteristics and experiences as inputs to the planning and design of learning opportunities. • interact with the national and local curriculum requirements. They translate curriculum content into learning activities that are relevant to learners and based on the principles of effective teaching and learning. The Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers PPST
• apply a variety of assessment tools and strategies in monitoring, evaluating, documenting
and reporting learners’ needs, progress and achievement. They use assessment data in a variety of ways to inform and enhance the teaching and learning process and programs. • stablish school-community partnerships aimed at enriching the learning environment, as well as the community’s engagement in the educative process. They identify and respond to opportunities that link teaching and learning in the classroom to the experiences, interests and aspirations of the wider school community and other key stakeholders. • value personal growth and professional development and exhibit high personal regard for the profession by maintaining qualities that uphold the dignity of teaching such as caring attitude, respect and integrity. They value personal and professional reflection and learning to improve their practice. They assume responsibility for personal growth and professional development for lifelong learning. LEARNING OUTCOMES
Learning outcomes must be based on needs of industry to eliminate
the gap between the academe and industry and so make teaching-learning relevant to the needs of industry to prepare the graduates adequately for their future jobs. Good Learning Outcomes are learner-centered. The learner outcomes describe very clearly what the learner is expected to know and do based on and aligned with the institutional, program and course outcomes. Good Learning Outcomes are based on and aligned with needs of industry and with local, national and international trends and issues. CHARACTERISTICS OF GOOD LEARNING OUTCOMES
1. Good learning outcomes are centered on the student/
learner. 2. Good learning outcomes are based on and aligned with the institutional, program and course outcomes. 3. Good learning outcomes are based on and aligned with local, national, and international trends and issues. 4. Good learning outcomes are known and are very well understood by both students and faculty. CHARACTERISTICS OF GOOD LEARNING OUTCOMES
5. Good learning outcomes include a spectrum of thinking
skills from simple remembering to creating or from the lowest and simplest cognitive, unistructural process to cognitive in Bloom’s and Anderson’s revised taxonomy of objectives. 6. Good Learning outcomes are SMART- Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Result- oriented and Time-bounded 7. Good Learning outcomes are useful and relevant to the learners LEARNING OUTCOMES
❑ When learning outcomes are specific and crystal clear, teachers
are given clear direction in teaching and learners see and understand clearly what are expected of them.
❑ Learning outcomes include a spectrum of thinking skills from
simple remembering to creating or from the lowest and simplest cognitive, unistructural process to the higher cognitive and integrative processes. BLOOM’S AND ANDERSON’S TAXONOMY OF OBJECTIVES BLOOM’S AND ANDERSON’S TAXONOMY OF OBJECTIVES McTighe and Wiggins UNDERSTANDING BY DESIGN (UbD) Fink’s for TAXONOMY FOR SIGNIFICANT LEARNING Bigg’s SOLO Taxonomy