Scribd
Upload
16 views3 pages

zIS1893_Part4Amd.2_2018

Amendment No. 2 to IS 1893 (Part 4) : 2015 updates criteria for earthquake-resistant design of industrial structures. Key changes include new definitions for soft and weak storeys, revised earthquake force estimation methods, and adjustments to clauses regarding dynamic analysis and spectral acceleration coefficients. The amendment aims to enhance the structural resilience against seismic activities by clarifying design provisions and methodologies.

Uploaded by

Nicola Morda
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
16 views3 pages

zIS1893_Part4Amd.2_2018

Amendment No. 2 to IS 1893 (Part 4) : 2015 updates criteria for earthquake-resistant design of industrial structures. Key changes include new definitions for soft and weak storeys, revised earthquake force estimation methods, and adjustments to clauses regarding dynamic analysis and spectral acceleration coefficients. The amendment aims to enhance the structural resilience against seismic activities by clarifying design provisions and methodologies.

Uploaded by

Nicola Morda
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

AMENDMENT NO.

2 JULY 2018
TO
IS 1893 (PART 4) : 2015 CRITERIA FOR EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT
DESIGN OF STRUCTURES

PART 4 INDUSTRIAL STRUCTURES INCLUDING STACK-LIKE STRUCTURES

(First Revision)

(Second cover page, foreword, para 3) — Insert the following new para at the end:

‘Part 1 contains general provisions that are applicable to all types of structures, and provisions that are specific
to buildings only. Unless stated otherwise, the provisions in Part 2 to Part 5 shall be read in conjunction with
the general provisions (clauses 1 to 6) of IS 1893 (Part 1).’

(Page 4, clause 4.19) — Substitute the following for the existing:

‘4.19 Soft Storey — It is one in which the lateral stiffness is less than that in the storey above. The storey lateral
stiffness is the total stiffness of all seismic force resisting elements resisting lateral earthquake shaking effects in
the considered direction.’

[Page 4, clause 4.24] — Substitute the following for the existing:

‘4.24 Weak Storey — It is one in which the storey lateral strength [cumulative design shear strength of all
structural members other than that of unreinforced masonry (URM) infills] is less than that in the storey above.
The storey lateral strength is the total strength of all seismic force resisting elements sharing the lateral storey
shear in the considered direction.’

(Page 6, clause 6.1.1, para 2, first sentence) — Substitute the following for the existing:

‘Earthquake generated vertical inertia forces are to be considered in design, wherever appropriate.’

[Page 7, clause 7.3.1, expression for Ah)] — Substitute the following for the existing:

S  I
Ah =  a 
 g ss R
 Sa 
where   is the site-specific spectral acceleration coefficient value denoting peak response acceleration
g
 ss
corresponding to fundamental natural time period of structure.

Price Group 2

1
Amendment No. 2 to IS 1893 (Part 4) : 2015

[Page 9, Table 2] — Substitute the following for the existing table:

Table 2 Earthquake Force Estimation, Method of Analysis and Design for Various Categories of
Structures
(Clause 8.2.4)

Sl Structur Minimum Lateral Force


No. e Earthquake Force Estimation Method of (Percent of Seismic Weight
Category W) for Different Zones
(see 8.1)

Seismic
Method of
Hazard Structural Structural
Damping Calculating II III IV V
Assessment Analysis Design
Natural Period
Method
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11)

i) 1 Site Specific / 5% (see 9.3; 14.1 a) Linear for Limit state 2.00 2.75 4.00 6.00
Standard for RC and 14.2) design, design as per
Specific Structures and IS 456 for RC;
Seismic and 2% for Modal analysis b) Non- and
Hazard steel with all linear time Design as per
Assessment as structures stiffnesses of history IS 800 for steel
per 7. the lateral as analysis for
(see 9.4 and well as vertical verification
15) load resisting of
members and mechanism
masses of the
building
modeled (For
preliminary
time period
estimation, see
9.3.2)

ii) 2 -do- -do- -do- Linear for -do- 1.50 2.00 3.00 4.50
Design

iii) 3 -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- 1.25 1.75 2.50 3.75

iv) 4 -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- 1.00 1.50 2.00 3.00

(Page 12, clause 9.3, Note 2) — Substitute the following for the existing note:
VB
‘2 There is no need to increase base shear, for industrial structures.’
VB

(Page 16, clause 14.2, Note 1, line 3) — Substitute ‘δ’ for ‘d’.

(Page 17, clause 16, para 3, expression of Ah) — Substitute the following for the existing:

‘For site specific spectra : A =  Sa  I ’


h  
 g ss R

(Page 17, clause 16, para 6) — Delete.

(Page 17, clause 16, para 7) — Delete.

Amendment No. 2 to IS 1893 (Part 4) : 2015


2
(Page 18, clause 17.2, Title) — Substitute the following for the existing title:

‘17.2 Dynamic Analysis (Response Spectrum Method)’

(Page 18, clause 17.2, fourth sentence) – Substitute the following for the existing:

‘Detailed dynamic analysis shall be required where analysis is based on site-specific response spectrum.’

(Page 20, Annex A, Table 15, title) — Substitute ‘Spectral Acceleration Coefficient Sa/g’ for ‘Zone
Factor Z’.

(Page 20, Annex A, Table 15) — Insert the following note at the end:

‘NOTE — At time t = 0, the multiplying factor need not be applied, and the value is specified only for suitable interpolation between
time t = 0 and t = 0.1

(Page 21, Annex B, figure) — Substitute ‘To be used for fundamental mode (for fundamental natural
period)’ for ‘To be used for the first mode’.

(CED 39)
Publication Unit, BIS, New Delhi, India
3

You might also like