0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views

Probability and Statistics - Int 2 - Answer Paper - Part B

The document presents the results of an experiment involving 6 treatments across 4 randomized blocks, detailing various statistical calculations such as sums of squares, degrees of freedom, and mean sums of squares. It includes analyses of variance (ANOVA) for two different sets of data, concluding whether there are significant differences between treatments. The results indicate acceptance or rejection of null hypotheses based on calculated F ratios compared to tabulated values.

Uploaded by

johnpaul
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views

Probability and Statistics - Int 2 - Answer Paper - Part B

The document presents the results of an experiment involving 6 treatments across 4 randomized blocks, detailing various statistical calculations such as sums of squares, degrees of freedom, and mean sums of squares. It includes analyses of variance (ANOVA) for two different sets of data, concluding whether there are significant differences between treatments. The results indicate acceptance or rejection of null hypotheses based on calculated F ratios compared to tabulated values.

Uploaded by

johnpaul
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 26

Consider results given in the Following Tables for an Experiment involved in 6 Treatments in 4 Randomised Blocks.

The treatments are indicated by Numbers with in


parameters
Block 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 3 2 4 5 6
1
24.7 27.7 20.6 16.2 16.2 24.9
3 2 1 4 6 5
2
22.9 28.8 27.3 15 22.5 17
6 4 1 3 2 3
3
26.3 19.6 38.5 36.8 39.5 15.4
5 2 1 4 3 6
4
17.7 31 28.5 14.1 34.9 22.6
Block X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 Total X12 X22 X32 X42 X52 X62
Y1 24.70 20.60 27.70 16.20 16.20 24.90 130.30 610.09 424.36 767.29 262.44 262.44 620.01 2946.63
Y2 27.30 28.80 22.90 15.00 17.00 22.50 133.50 745.29 829.44 524.41 225.00 289.00 506.25 3119.39
Y3 38.50 39.50 15.40 19.60 36.80 26.30 176.10 1482.25 1560.25 237.16 384.16 1354.24 691.69 5709.75
Y4 28.50 31.00 34.90 14.10 17.70 22.60 148.80 812.25 961.00 1218.01 198.81 313.29 510.76 4014.12
119.00 119.90 100.90 64.90 87.70 96.30 588.70 3649.88 3775.05 2746.87 1070.41 2218.97 2328.71 15789.89 EX12
(EX1)2 14161 14376.01 10180.81 4212.01 7691.29 9273.69 59894.81 (EX1)2/N1 14973.7
(EY1) 2
87952.99 (EY1) /N2
2
14658.83
Step - 1 N = 24
Step - 2 T = 588.70
Step - 3 T2 = 14440.32
Step - 4 N
Step - 5 TSS = 15789.89 - 14440.32 1349.57
Step - 6 SSC = 14973.703 - 14440.32 533.38
Step - 7 SSR = 14658.832 - 14440.32 218.51
Step - 8 SSE = 1349.57 - 533.38 - 218.51 597.68
Source
sum of Square D.F Mean Sum of Square Variance Ratio Table Value
Variation
C SSC 533.38 C-1 6-1 = 5 MSC =533.38/5 106.68 FC 2.68 Fc 5, 15 2.9
R SSR 218.51 R-1 4-1 = 3 MSR =218.51/3 72.84 Fr 1.83 Fr 3, 15 3.29
Error SSE 597.68 = 5 X 3 = 15 MSE =597.68/15 39.85
Consider results given in the Following Tables for an Experiment involved in 6 Treatments in 4 Randomised Blocks. The treatments are indicated by Numbers with in
parameters

Block 1 2 3 4 5 6

1 3 2 4 5 6
1
24.7 27.9 20.6 16.2 16.2 24.9
3 2 1 4 6 5
2
22.7 28.8 27.3 15 22.5 17
6 4 1 3 2 3
3
26.3 19.6 38.5 36.8 39.5 15.4
5 2 1 4 3 6
4
17.7 31 28.5 14.1 34.9 22.6
Block X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 Total X12 X22 X32 X42 X52 X62

Y1 24.7 27.9 20.6 16.2 16.2 24.9 130.50 610.09 778.41 424.36 262.44 262.44 620.01 2957.75
Y2 22.7 28.8 27.3 15 22.5 17 133.30 515.29 829.44 745.29 225.00 506.25 289.00 3110.27
Y3 26.3 19.6 38.5 36.8 39.5 15.4 176.10 691.69 384.16 1482.25 1354.24 1560.25 237.16 5709.75
Y4 17.7 31 28.5 14.1 34.9 22.6 148.80 313.29 961.00 812.25 198.81 1218.01 510.76 4014.12

91.40 107.30 114.90 82.10 113.10 79.90 588.70 2130.36 2953.01 3464.15 2040.49 3546.95 1656.93 15791.89 EX12

(EX1)2 8353.96 11513.29 13202.01 6740.41 12791.61 6384.01 58985.29 (EX1)2/N1 14746.32

(EY1)2 87951.79 (EY1)2/N2 14658.63

Step - 1 N = 24
Step - 2 T = 588.70

T2
Step - 3 = 14440.32
N

Step - 4 TSS = 15791.89 - 14440.32 1351.57

Step - 5 SSC = 14746.323 - 14440.32 306.00

Step - 6 SSR = 14658.632 - 14440.32 218.31


Block 1 2 3 4 5 6

Z1 24.70 20.60 27.70 16.20 16.20 24.90

Z2 27.30 28.80 22.90 15.00 17.00 22.50


Z3 38.50 39.50 15.40 19.60 36.80 26.30
Z4 28.50 31.00 34.90 14.10 17.70 22.60

119.00 119.90 100.90 64.90 87.70 96.30

14161.00 14376.01 10180.81 4212.01 7691.29 9273.69 59894.81 9982.47

Step - 7 SSR 9982.47 - 14440.32 -4457.85

Step - 8 SSE = 1351.57 - 306.00 - 218.31 - -4457.85 5285.11


Source
sum of Square D.F Mean Sum of Square Variance Ratio Table Value
Variation

C SSC 306.00 C-1 6-1 = 5 MSC =533.38/5 61.20 FC 0.17 Fc 5, 15 2.9

R SSR 218.31 R-1 4-1 = 3 MSR =218.51/3 72.77 Fr 0.21 Fr 3, 15 3.29

T SST -4457.85 T-1 6-1=5 MST 1057.022 -891.57 Ft -2.53 Ft


Error SSE 5285.11 = 5 X 3 = 15 MSE =597.68/15 352.34
PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS INTERNAL TEST – II –SOLUTIONS
PART – B
1 A test was to 5 Students taken at Random from the 5th class of three School of a
town the individual scores are

School - I 9 7 6 5 8
School – II 7 4 5 4 5
School - III 6 5 6 7 6

Carry out the Analysis of Variance and state your Conclusion


Solution
1. H0 = There is no significance difference between the treatments
2. H1 = There is a significance difference between the treatments

X1 X2 X3 T X12 X22 X32


Y1 9 7 6 22 81 49 36 166
Y2 7 4 5 16 49 16 25 90
Y3 6 5 6 17 36 25 36 97
Y4 5 4 7 16 25 16 49 90
Y5 8 5 6 19 64 25 36 125
35 25 30 90 255 131 182 568
1225 625 900 2750
Step.1 N = 15
Step.2 – T = 90
8100
Step.3 – T2/ N = 540
Step.3 – T2/ N = 540
15
Step.4 – Calculate TSS = ∑ X12+∑ X22+………. – T2/N
TSS = 568 - 540 28

Step.5 – Calculate SSC = ∑ (X1)2+∑ (X22)+………. – T2


N1 N1 N
2750
SSC = - 540 10
5
Step.6 – Calculate SSE =TSS – SSC

SSE = 28 - 10 18

Step.7 – Prepare the ANOVA Table to Calculate F Ratio and the Table Value

Source of Mean Sum of Variance Tabulation


Variation Sum of Squares D.F squares ratio Value

Between SSC = 10 C-1 = 2 5 3.33 Fc = 2,12


Column
N-C=
Error SSE = 18 15 - 3 = 12 1.5 3.89
12
Step.8 - Conclusion

Calculation Value < Tabulation Value

3.33 < 3.89


So, we Accept Ho at 5% Less
PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS INTERNAL TEST – II –SOLUTIONS
PART – B
2 The following Data gives the yields on 12 sample plots under three varieties of
seed
A B C
21 20 28
23 17 22
16 15 28
20 23 32
Find out if the average yields of land under different variance show significant
differences
Solution
1. H0 = There is no significance difference between the treatments
2. H1 = There is a significance difference between the treatments
X1 X2 X3 T X12 X22 X32
Y1 21 20 28 69 441 400 784 1625
Y2 23 17 22 62 529 289 484 1302
Y3 16 15 28 59 256 225 784 1265
Y4 20 23 32 75 400 529 1024 1953
80 75 110 265 1626 1443 3076 6145
6400 5625 12100 24125
Step.1 N = 12
Step.2 – T = 265
70225
Step.3 – T2/ N = 5852.08
Step.3 – T2/ N = 5852.08
12
Step.4 – Calculate TSS = ∑ X12+∑ X22+………. – T2/N
TSS = 6145 - 5852.08 292.92

Step.5 – Calculate SSC = ∑ (X1)2+∑ (X22)+………. – T2


N1 N1 N
24125
SSC = - 5852.083333 179.17
4
Step.6 – Calculate SSE =TSS – SSC

SSE = 292.91667 - 179.1666667 113.75

Step.7 – Prepare the ANOVA Table to Calculate F Ratio and the Table Value

Source of Mean Sum of Variance Tabulation


Variation Sum of Squares D.F squares ratio Value

Between SSC = 179.17 C-1 = 2 89.58 7.09 Fc = 2,9


Column
N-C=
Error SSE = 113.75 12 - 3 = 9 12.64 4.26
12
Step.8 - Conclusion

Calculation Value > Tabulation Value

7.09 > 4.26


So, we Reject Ho at 5% Less
PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS INTERNAL TEST – II –SOLUTIONS
PART – B
3 Three Process A,B and C are tested to see whether their outputs are equivalent.
The following observations of out put are made
A 10 12 13 11 10 14 15 13
B 9 11 10 12 13
C 11 10 15 14 12 13

Carry out the analysis of variance and state your conclusion.

Solution
1. H0 = There is no significance difference between the treatments
2. H1 = There is a significance difference between the treatments
X1 X2 X3 T X12 X22 X32
Y1 10 9 11 30 100 81 121 302
Y2 12 11 10 33 144 121 100 365
Y3 13 10 15 38 169 100 225 494
Y4 11 12 14 37 121 144 196 461
Y5 10 13 12 35 100 169 144 413
Y6 14 13 27 196 169 365
Y7 15 15 225 225
Y8 13 13 169 169
98 55 75 228 1224 615 955 2794
9604 3025 5625 18254

Step.1 N = 19
Step.2 – T = 228
51984
Step.3 – T2/ N = 2736.00
19
Step.4 – Calculate TSS = ∑ X12+∑ X22+………. – T2/N
TSS = 2794 - 2736.00 58.00

Step.5 – Calculate SSC = ∑ (X1)2+∑ (X22)+………. – T2


N1 N1 N
SSC = 2743 - 2736 7.00

Step.6 – Calculate SSE =TSS – SSC


SSE = 58 - 7 51

Step.7 – Prepare the ANOVA Table to Calculate F Ratio and the Table Value

Source of Mean Sum of Variance Tabulation


Variation Sum of Squares D.F squares ratio Value

Between
Column SSC = 7.00 C-1 = 2 3.50 1.10 Fc = 2,16
N-C=
Error SSE = 51 19 - 3 = 16 3.19 3.63
12
Step.8 - Conclusion

Calculation Value < Tabulation Value


1.10 < 3.63
So, we Reject Ho at 5% Less
PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS INTERNAL TEST – II –SOLUTIONS
PART – B
4 The following Data Shows the lives in hours of 4 Batches of Electric Lamps
1 1610 1610 1650 1680 1700 1720 1800
2 1580 1640 1640 1700 1750
3 1450 1550 1600 1620 1640 1660 1740 1820
4 1510 1520 1530 1570 1600 1680
Perform and analysis of Variance of these datas and show that the significance test does not reject their homogenity

Solution
1. H0 = There is no significance difference between the treatments
2. H1 = There is a significance difference between the treatments

X1 X2 X3 X4 T X12 X22 X32 X42


Y1 1610 1580 1450 1510 6150 2592100 2496400 2280100 37822500 45191100
Y2 1610 1640 1550 1520 6320 2592100 2689600 2310400 39942400 47534500
Y3 1650 1640 1600 1530 6420 2722500 2689600 2340900 41216400 48969400
Y4 1680 1700 1620 1570 6570 2822400 2890000 2464900 43164900 51342200
Y5 1700 1750 1640 1600 6690 2890000 3062500 2560000 44756100 53268600
Y6 1720 1660 1680 2958400 2822400 0 5780800
Y7 1800 1740 3240000 3240000
Y8 1820 0
11770 8310 9410 32150 19817500 13828100 14778700 48424300
Step.1 N = 26
Step.2 – T = 97
9409
Step.3 – T2/ N = 361.88
Step.3 – T2/ N = 361.88
26
X1 X2 X3 X4 T X12 X22 X32 X42
Y1 1 -2 -15 -9 -25 1 4 225 81 311
Y2 1 4 -5 -8 -8 1 16 25 64 106
Y3 5 4 0 -7 2 25 16 0 49 90
Y4 8 10 2 -3 17 64 100 4 9 177
Y5 10 15 4 0 29 100 225 16 0 341
Y6 12 6 8 26 144 36 64 244
Y7 20 14 34 400 196 596
Y8 22 22 484 484
57 31 28 -19 97 735 361 986 267 2349
3249 961 784 361 5355
Step.4 – Calculate TSS = ∑ X12+∑ X22+………. – T2/N
TSS = 2349 - 361.88 1987.12
Step.5 – Calculate SSC = ∑ (X1)2+∑ (X22)+………. – T2
N1 N1 N
SSC = 814.51 - 361.88 452.62
Step.6 – Calculate SSE =TSS – SSC
SSE = 1987.115385 - 452.62 1534.49
Step.7 – Prepare the ANOVA Table to Calculate F Ratio and the Table Value
Source of Mean Sum of Tabulation
Sum of Squares D.F Variance ratio
Variation squares Value
Between Column SSC = 452.62 C-1 = 3 150.87 2.16 Fc = 3, 22
N-C=
Error SSE = 1534.49 22 69.75 3.05
26 - 4 =
Step.8 - Conclusion
Calculation Value < Tabulation Value
2.16 < 3.05 So, we Accept Ho at 5% Less
PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS INTERNAL TEST – II –SOLUTIONS
PART – B
5 Carry out the analysis of variance for the data for yields of seven varieties, five observations being taken on each variety

Observatio Variety Number


n No.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 13 15 14 14 17 15 16
2 11 11 10 10 15 9 12
3 10 13 12 15 14 13 13
4 16 18 13 17 19 14 15
5 12 12 11 10 12 10 12

Carry out the analysis of variance and state your conclusion.


Solution
1. H0 = There is no significance difference between the treatments
2. H1 = There is a significance difference between the treatments
X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7 T X12 X22 X32 X42 X52 X62 X72
Y1 13 15 14 14 17 15 16 104 169 225 196 196 289 225 256 1556
Y2 11 11 10 10 15 9 12 78 121 121 100 100 225 81 144 892
Y3 10 13 12 15 14 13 13 90 100 169 144 225 196 169 169 1172
Y4 16 18 13 17 19 14 15 112 256 324 169 289 361 196 225 1820
Y5 12 12 11 10 12 10 12 79 144 144 121 100 144 100 144 897
62 69 60 66 77 61 68 463 790 983 730 910 1215 771 938 6337
3844 4761 3600 4356 5929 3721 4624 30835
10816 6084 8100 12544 6241 43785
Step.1 N = 35
Step.2 – T = 463
214369
Step.3 – T2/ N = 6124.83
35
Step.4 – Calculate TSS = ∑ X12+∑ X22+………. – T2/N
TSS = 6337 - 6124.83 212.17
Step.5 – Calculate SSC = ∑ (X1)2+∑ (X22)+………. – T2
N1 N1 N
30835
SSC = - 6124.828571 = 42.17
5
Step.5 – Calculate SSR = ∑ (Y1)2+∑ (Y22)+………. – T2
N2 N2 N
43785
SSR = - 6124.83 = 130.17
7
Step.6 – Calculate SSE =TSS – SSC - SSR
SSE = 212.17 - 42.17 - 130.17 = 39.83
Step.7 – Prepare the ANOVA Table to Calculate F Ratio and the Table Value
Source of Mean Sum of Variance
Sum of Squares D.F Tabulation Value
Variation squares ratio
Between
SSC = 42.17 C-1 = 6 7.03 4.235 Fc = 6,24 = 2.51
Column
Between Row SSR = 130.17 R-1= 4 32.54 19.610 Fr = 4,24 = 2.78
Error SSE = 39.83 C-1 x R-1= 24 1.66 3.63
Step.8 - Conclusion
Calculation Value Tabulation Value
Fc 4.24 > 2.51 Rejected
Fr 19.61 > 2.78 Rejected
So, we Reject Ho at 5% Less
PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS INTERNAL TEST – II –SOLUTIONS
PART – B
6 Consider results given in the Following Tables for an Experiment involved in 6 Treatments in 4 Randomised Blocks. The treatments are
indicated by Numbers with in parameters
Block 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 3 2 4 5 6
1
24.7 27.7 20.6 16.2 16.2 24.9
3 2 1 4 6 5
2
22.7 28.8 27.3 15 22.5 17
6 4 1 3 2 3
3
26.3 19.6 38.5 36.8 39.5 15.4
5 2 1 4 3 6
4
17.7 31 28.5 14.1 34.9 22.6

Block X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 Total X12 X22 X32 X42 X52 X62


Y1 24.7 27.7 20.6 16.2 16.2 24.9 130.30 610.09 767.29 424.36 262.44 262.44 620.01 2946.63
Y2 22.7 28.8 27.3 15 22.5 17 133.30 515.29 829.44 745.29 225.00 506.25 289.00 3110.27
Y3 26.3 19.6 38.5 36.8 39.5 15.4 176.10 691.69 384.16 1482.25 1354.24 1560.25 237.16 5709.75
Y4 17.7 31 28.5 14.1 34.9 22.6 148.80 313.29 961.00 812.25 198.81 1218.01 510.76 4014.12

91.40 107.10 114.90 82.10 113.10 79.90 588.50 2130.36 2941.89 3464.15 2040.49 3546.95 1656.93 15780.77

(EX1)2 8353.96 11470.41 13202.01 6740.41 12791.61 6384.01 58942.41 (EX1)2/N1 14735.6025
(EY1)2 87899.63 (EY1)2/N2 14649.938333
Step - 1 N = 24
Step - 2 T = 588.50

Step - 3 T2 = 14430.51
Step - 3 = 14430.51
N
Step - 4 TSS = 15780.77 - 14430.51 1350.26
Step - 5 SSC = 14735.6025 - 14430.51 305.09
Step - 6 SSR = 14649.9383 - 14430.51 219.43
Block 1 2 3 4 5 6
Z1 24.70 20.60 27.70 16.20 16.20 24.90
Z2 27.30 28.80 22.90 15.00 17.00 22.50
Z3 38.50 39.50 15.40 19.60 36.80 26.30
Z4 28.50 31.00 34.90 14.10 17.70 22.60

119.00 119.90 100.90 64.90 87.70 96.30


14161.00 14376.01 10180.81 4212.01 7691.29 9273.69 59894.81 14973.70
Step - 7 SST 14973.70 - 14440.32 533.38
Step - 8 SSE = 1350.26 - 305.09 - 219.43 - 533.38 292.36
Source
sum of Square D.F Mean Sum of Square Variance Ratio Table Value
Variation

C SSC 305.09 C-1 5 MSC 61.02 FC 2.09 Fc 5, 15 2.9


R SSR 219.43 R-1 3 MSR 73.14 Fr 2.50 Fr 3, 15 3.29
T SST 533.38 T-1 5 MST 106.68 Ft 3.65 Ft 5,15 2.9
Error SSE 292.36 C-1 x R-2 10 MSE 29.24

Step.8 - Conclusion
Calculation Value Tabulation Value
Fc 2.09 < 2.9 Accepted
Fr 2.50 < 3.29 Accepted
Ft 3.65 > 2.9 Rejected
So, we Reject Ho at 5% Less
PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS INTERNAL TEST – II –SOLUTIONS
PART – B
7 The following table gives the quality rating of service stations by five professional raters
Service stations
Rater 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 99 70 90 99 65 85 75 70 85 92
2 96 65 80 95 70 88 70 51 84 91
3 95 60 48 87 48 75 71 93 80 93
4 98 65 70 95 67 82 73 94 86 80
5 97 65 62 99 60 80 76 92 90 89
Analyse the data and discus whether there is any significance difference between ratings or between service stations
Rater X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7 X8 X9 X10 Total X12 X22 X32 X42 X52 X62 X72 X82 X92 X102
Y1 19 -10 10 19 -15 5 -5 -10 5 12 30 361 100 100 361 225 25 25 100 25 144 1466.00
Y2 16 -15 0 15 -10 8 -10 -29 4 11 -10 256 225 0 225 100 64 100 841 16 121 1948.00
Y3 15 -20 -32 7 -32 -5 -9 13 0 13 -50 225 400 1024 49 1024 25 81 169 0 169 3166.00
Y4 18 -15 -10 15 -13 2 -7 14 6 0 10 324 225 100 225 169 4 49 196 36 0 1328.00
Y5 17 -15 -18 19 -20 0 -4 12 10 9 10 289 225 324 361 400 0 16 144 100 81 1940.00
85 -75 -50 75 -90 10 -35 0 25 45 -10 1455 1175 1548 1221 1918 118 271 1450 177 515 9848.00
(EX1) 2
7225 5625 2500 5625 8100 100 1225 0 625 2025 33050 (EX1)2/N1 6610
(EY1)2 3700 (EY1)2/N2 370
Step - 1 N = 50
Step - 2 T = -10.00
T2 2.00
Step - 3 =
N
Step - 4 TSS = 9848.00 - 2.00 9846.00
Step - 5 SSC = 6610.00 - 2.00 6608.00
Step - 6 SSR = 370.00 - 2.00 368.00
Step - 8 SSE = 9846.00 - 6608.00 - 368.00 2870.00
Source
sum of Square D.F Mean Sum of Square Variance Ratio Table Value
Variation
C SSC 6608.00 C-1 9 MSC 734.22 FC 6.91 Fc 9, 36 2.12
R SSR 368.00 R-1 4 MSR 92.00 Fr 0.87 Fr 4, 36 2.61
Error SSE 2870.00 C-1 x R-2 27 MSE 106.30
Step.8 - Conclusion
Calculation Value Tabulation Value
Fc 6.91 > 2.12 Rejected
Fr 0.87 < 2.61 Accepted
So, we Reject Ho at 5% Less
PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS INTERNAL TEST – II –SOLUTIONS
PART – B
8 Setup the analysis of variance for the following results of Latin Square design

Block A B 3 4
A B C D
1
12 19 10 8
C B D A
2
18 12 6 7
B D A C
3
22 10 5 21

Block X1 X2 X3 X4 Total T= X12 X22 X32 X42


Y1 12 19 10 8 49.00 144.00 361.00 100.00 64.00 669.00
Y2 18 12 6 7 43.00 324.00 144.00 36.00 49.00 553.00
22 10 5 21 58.00 484.00 100.00 25.00 441.00 1050.00
Y3 12 7 27 17 63.00 144.00 49.00 729.00 289.00 1211.00
64.00 48.00 48.00 53.00 213.00 1096.00 654.00 890.00 843.00 3483.00

(EX1)2 4096 2304 2304 2809 11513 2878.25


(EY1)2 2401 1849 3364 3969 11583 2895.75
Step - 1 N = 16
Step - 2 T = 213.00

Step - 3 T2 = 2835.56
N
Step - 4 TSS = 3483.00 - 2835.56 647.44
Step - 5 SSC = 2878.25 - 2835.56 42.69
Step - 6 SSR = 2895.75 - 2835.56 60.19
Block A B C D
Z1 12.00 19.00 10.00 8.00
Z2 7.00 12.00 18.00 6.00
Z3 5.00 22.00 21.00 10.00
Z4 7.00 12.00 27.00 17.00
31.00 65.00 76.00 41.00
961.00 4225.00 5776.00 1681.00 12643.00 3160.75
Step - 7 SST 3160.75 - 2835.56 325.19
Step - 8 SSE = 647.44 - 42.69 - 60.19 - 325.19 219.38
Source
sum of Square D.F Mean Sum of Square Variance Ratio Table Value
Variation

C SSC 42.69 C-1 3 MSC 14.23 FC 0.39 Fc 3, 9 3.86


R SSR 60.19 R-1 3 MSR 20.06 Fr 0.55 Fr 3, 9 3.86
T SST 325.19 T-1 3 MST 108.40 Ft 2.96 Ft 3, 9 3.86
Error SSE 219.38 C-1 x R-2 6 MSE 36.56

Step.8 - Conclusion
Calculation Value Tabulation Value
Fc 0.39 < 3.86 Accepted
Fr 0.55 < 3.86 Accepted
Ft 2.96 < 3.86 Accepted
So, we Reject Ho at 5% Less
PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS INTERNAL TEST – II –SOLUTIONS
PART – B
9 Analyse the following results of a latin square experiments
Block 1 2 3 4
A D C B
1
12 20 16 10
D A B C
2
18 14 11 14
B C D A
3
12 15 19 13
C B A D
4
16 11 15 20
The letters ABCD denotes the treatments and the figures in brackets denotes the observations

Block X1 X2 X3 X4 Total T= X12 X22 X32 X42 Total


Y1 12 20 16 10 58.00 144.00 400.00 256.00 100.00 900.00
Y2 18 14 11 14 57.00 324.00 196.00 121.00 196.00 837.00
Y3 12 15 19 13 59.00 144.00 225.00 361.00 169.00 899.00
Y4 16 11 15 20 62.00 256.00 121.00 225.00 400.00 1002.00
58.00 60.00 61.00 57.00 236.00 868.00 942.00 963.00 865.00 3638.00

(EX1)2 3364 3600 3721 3249 13934 3483.50


(EY1) 2
3364 3249 3481 3844 13938 3484.5
Step - 1 N = 16
Step - 2 T = 236.00

Step - 3 T2 = 3481.00
N
Step - 4 TSS = 3638.00 - 3481.00 157.00
Step - 5 SSC = 3483.50 - 3481.00 2.50
Step - 6 SSR = 3484.5 - 3481.00 3.50
Block A B C D
Z1 12.00 10.00 16.00 20.00
Z2 14.00 11.00 14.00 18.00
Z3 13.00 12.00 15.00 19.00
Z4 15.00 11.00 16.00 20.00
54.00 44.00 61.00 77.00
2916.00 1936.00 3721.00 5929.00 14502.00 3625.50
Step - 7 SST 3625.50 - 3481.00 144.50
Step - 8 SSE = 157.00 - 2.50 - 3.50 - 144.50 6.50
Source
sum of Square D.F Mean Sum of Square Variance Ratio Table Value
Variation

C SSC 2.50 C-1 3 MSC 0.83 FC 0.77 Fc 3, 9 3.86


R SSR 3.50 R-1 3 MSR 1.17 Fr 1.08 Fr 3, 9 3.86
T SST 144.50 T-1 3 MST 48.17 Ft 44.46 Ft 3, 9 3.86
Error SSE 6.50 C-1 x R-2 6 MSE 1.08

Step.8 - Conclusion
Calculation Value Tabulation Value
Fc 0.77 < 3.86 Accepted
Fr 1.08 < 3.86 Accepted
Ft 44.46 > 3.86 Rejected
So, we Reject Ho at 5% Less

You might also like