Scribd
Upload
7 views

CIVE1007 Assignment 3 Oral Presentation

The document is an assessment form for an oral presentation assignment in the Professional Communication module at the University of Mauritius. It outlines the assessment criteria, including content, structure, grammar, presentation aids, and delivery, with a total score of 20 marks. The form is to be filled out by the assessor, A. Chan Chim Yuk, and includes space for student identification and remarks.

Uploaded by

Yohan Lim
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
7 views

CIVE1007 Assignment 3 Oral Presentation

The document is an assessment form for an oral presentation assignment in the Professional Communication module at the University of Mauritius. It outlines the assessment criteria, including content, structure, grammar, presentation aids, and delivery, with a total score of 20 marks. The form is to be filled out by the assessor, A. Chan Chim Yuk, and includes space for student identification and remarks.

Uploaded by

Yohan Lim
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

UNIVERSITY OF MAURITIUS

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING

ASSESSMENT FORM

Module Name: Professional Communication


Module Code: CIVE1007Y
Student ID:
Name of Assessor: A. Chan Chim Yuk
Date:

ASSIGNMENT No 3: Oral Presentation (5 minutes) using power point slides

Assessment criteria Score Remarks


Content (4 marks)
Was the objective of the presentation made clear?
Was the content informative?
Structure & organisation of ideas (4 marks)
Was there a clear, logical structure including
effective introduction and conclusion?
Was there a good flow of ideas?
Grammar & style (2 marks)
Was there correct use of grammar and sentence
structure?
Presentation aids (4 marks)
Were the aids well integrated into the talk?
Were the slides clear and effective in transmitting
the main points?
Delivery (6 marks)
Was there sufficient eye contact with the
audience?
Was there effective use of posture and space?
Were the pronunciation, articulation, pace, volume
and intonation clear and appropriate?
Was the time limit observed?
Total (20 marks)

You might also like