CBD BS 5950 90
CBD BS 5950 90
Design Manual
BS 5950-3.1:1990
For
The CSI Logo® and ETABS® are registered trademarks of Computers and Structures, Inc.
The computer program ETABS® and all associated documentation are proprietary and copyrighted
products. Worldwide rights of ownership rest with Computers and Structures, Inc. Unlicensed use of this
program or reproduction of documentation in any form, without prior written authorization from
Computers and Structures, Inc., is explicitly prohibited.
No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a
database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the publisher.
CONSIDERABLE TIME, EFFORT, AND EXPENSE HAVE GONE INTO THE DEVELOPMENT
AND TESTING OF THIS SOFTWARE. HOWEVER, THE USER ACCEPTS AND UNDERSTANDS
THAT NO WARRANTY IS EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED BY THE DEVELOPERS OR THE
DISTRIBUTORS ON THE ACCURACY OR THE RELIABILITY OF THIS PRODUCT.
i
Contents
Symbols 1
1 Introduction 5
2 Design Preliminaries 7
i
4 Composite Beam Section Properties and Bending Resistance 16
5 Strength Checks 27
6 Deflection Checks 33
6.3 Camber 34
ii
7 Shear Connectors 37
7.1 Beam Segments and their Maximum and Minimum Numbers of Studs 37
7.1.1 Beam Segments 37
7.1.2 Maximum Number of Shear Connectors on Beam Segments 39
7.1.3 Minimum Number of Shear Connectors on Beam Segments 40
8 Vibration Checks 46
iii
B2. Bracing (C) and Bracing (S) Tabs 59
iv
Symbols
The following table provides a list of the symbols used in this manual and their definitions. As a
rule, the symbols used in this manual match those used in BS5950-3 , and Murray as referenced
elsewhere in this manual.
Symbols 1
Composite Beam Design BS 5950-3.1:1990 Symbols
Ix Moment of inertia of the structural steel section about its major axis
Iy Moment of inertia of the structural steel section about its minor axis
J Torsion constant of a steel section
Kf A unitless coefficient typically equal to 1.57 unless the beam is the overhanging
portion of a cantilever with a backspan
L Center-of-support to center-of-support length of the beam
LE Laterally unbraced length of beam; length between points that are braced against
lateral displacement of the compression flange or braced against twist of the
cross-section
M Design bending moment
Mb Lateral-torsional buckling moment capacity of a steel beam
Mc Moment capacity of a composite cross-section
Ms Fully braced moment capacity of a steel cross-section
N1 Required force to be provided by the shear connectors between the point of
maximum moment and an adjacent point of zero moment (or end of slab)
N2 Required force to be provided by the shear connectors between a point load and a
point of zero moment (or end of slab)
Neff Effective number of beams resisting the heel drop impact
P0 Amplitude of the driving force, P0 =290N
PV Shear capacity for the major shear
Qk Characteristic resistance of a headed stud connector
Qp Design value of the shear resistance of a single shear connector in a solid concrete
slab
Rc Compression force in the concrete slab
Rq Sum of strengths of shear connectors between the location of the station being
checked and the nearest point of zero moment to either side
Rs Axial resistance of a steel section
Sr Center-to-center spacing of metal deck ribs
Sx Plastic modulus of a steel section about the major axis
T Thickness of flange
Tbot Thickness of bottom flange
Ttop Thickness of top flange
W Total weight supported by a beam
Z Elastic section modulus of the structural steel section, including cover plate if any
Symbols 2
Composite Beam Design BS 5950-3.1:1990 Symbols
beff-left Effective width of the concrete slab on the left side of a beam
beff-right Effective width of the concrete slab on the right side of a beam
br Average width of concrete rib
d Clear distance between flanges less the fillet or corner radius at each flange for
rolled shapes and clear distance between flanges for welded shapes
d1 Distance from the centroid of the compression force, C, in the slab the top of the
steel section
d2 Distance from the centroid of the compression force in the steel section to the top
of the steel section
d3 Distance from the centroid of the steel section to the top of the steel section
davg Average depth of concrete slab including the concrete in the metal deck ribs
f Natural fundamental vibration frequency of a beam
fcu Design value of compressive strength of concrete
f cu −left Design compressive strength of concrete on left side of beam
Symbols 3
Composite Beam Design BS 5950-3.1:1990 Symbols
tc Thickness of concrete slab. If there is metal deck, this is the thickness of the
concrete slab above the metal deck. Possibly different on the left and right sides of
the beam
tcp Thickness of cover plate
tf Thickness of the flanges
tw Thickness of the web
u Buckling parameter
wp Unit weight of rhythmic activity participants distributed over the entire bay
wt Distributed weight supported, including dead load, superimposed dead load,
occupants and participants distributed over the entire bay
z Distance from the bottom of the bottom flange of the structural steel section to the
elastic neutral axis of the fully composite beam section
y Distance from the bottom of the bottom flange of the steel section, excluding any
cover plate, to the neutral axis of the composite section, including any cover plate
ybare Distance from the bottom of the bottom flange of the steel section, excluding any
cover plate, to the neutral axis of the structural steel, including any cover plate
αe Effective modular ratio used to evaluate the contributions of the concrete
αl Modular ratio for long-term loading
αs Modular ratio for short-term loading
ε Coefficient depending on py
ηLT Perry coefficient, , for rolled and welded sections
Symbols 4
1 Introduction
This manual describes composite beam design in ETABS per the BS 5950-3.1:1990+A1:2010
Structural use of steelwork in Building Part 3: Design in composite construction – Section 3.1
Code of practice for design of simple and continuous composite beams – referred to as BS5950-
3 henceforth.
Once you have analyzed a model, you can perform the design of its composite beams by
selecting the Design menu > Composite Beam Design > Start Design/Check command.
• control the various design parameters, including the applicable design code, on a
model-wide basis
• control the various design parameters on a beam-by-beam basis
• select groups of beams to be designed all with the same section
• change the design load combinations from the default ones
• design individual or grouped beams interactively,
• view the design results
• freeze the design section of selected beams
• change the design section of selected beams by selecting a specific section from a list
• change the design of selected beams by copying a design from a beam and pasting it to
other beams
• change the design sections of selected beams by resetting them to what they were when
the model was last analyzed
• compare the current design sections to what they were when the model was last
analyzed
• verify that all the previous designs are still acceptable after the model was re-analyzed,
or the design preferences and/or the beam overwrites were changed
• reset all the design parameters
• delete the current design results
Composite beam design consists of trying various trial structural steel sections, computing their
composite section properties, the resulting shear and flexural stresses and deflections at several
key locations along the length of a beam, and then comparing those computed values with
acceptable limits. That comparison produces a demand/capacity ratio, which typically should
not exceed a value of one if code requirements are to be satisfied. ETABS checks the
Introduction 5
Composite Beam Design BS 5950-3.1:1990 Introduction
requirements for strength and deflection limit states under construction and service conditions.
It also checks vibrations acceptability under service conditions.
For each structural steel section it evaluates, ETABS determines the total number of shear
connectors required to satisfy the design requirements and their distribution. If you prefer,
ETABS can check the adequacy of a shear connector distribution you specify. In interactive
design mode, you can try out various design sections and vary the percentage of composite
action for each and view the resulting demand/capacity ratios and shear connector distributions.
The design output can be presented graphically, in tables for both input and output data, or in
calculation sheets prepared for each beam.
The remainder of this manual is organized in seven chapters and two appendices:
• Chapter 2 introduces the composite beam design preferences and beam overwrites and
explains which frame objects are designed as composite beams
• Chapter 3 provides an overview of how ETABS determines the values of the section
properties of the steel beam acting alone and its bending resistance
• Chapter 4 explains how ETABS computes the transformed moment of inertia and the
elastic and plastic bending resistance of composite beams
• Chapter 7 explains how ETABS determines the total numbers of shear connectors
required on beams and their distribution
Introduction 6
2 Design Preliminaries
This chapter introduces the composite beam design preferences and beam overwrites and explains
which frame objects are designed as composite beams.
Default values are provided for all preference items and you should review these with the
Design > Composite Beam Design > View/Revise Preferences… command to ensure they are
acceptable. The preference items are described in Appendix A.
You can change the values of the preferences with the View/Revise Preferences…command at
any time. After changing the preferences, you can redesign the beams, or you can check that the
previous designs are still acceptable with the Design > Composite Beam Design > Verify All
Members Passed… command.
The beam overwrites are assignments that apply only to selected beam objects. They take
precedence over the preference items. They include most of the preference items, plus some
assignments that are beam-specific by nature.
Default values are provided for all overwrite items. You can change these values with the
Design > Composite Beam Design > View/Revise Overwrites… command or by clicking the
Overwrites… button when designing a beam in interactive mode. The overwrite items are
described in Appendix B.
After changing the overwrites with the View/Revise Overwrites… command, you can redesign
the affected beams, or you can check that the previous designs are still acceptable with the
Verify All Members Passed… command.
Design Preliminaries 7
Composite Beam Design BS 5950-3.1:1990 Design Preliminaries
Only frame objects that are assigned an I-section, channel section, or auto-select section
consisting of a list of any of these can be designed as composite beams. The I-shaped and
channel sections can be imported from the built-in property files, or they can be user-defined.
Sections defined with the Section Designer and non-prismatic sections are categorized as
“general” sections regardless of their actual shape, and ETABS will not design beams with such
sections as composite beams.
Unsymmetrical I-section and channels in which the top and bottom flange have different
dimensions are valid composite beam sections, although you may have limited use for them
since you can specify the provision of a bottom flange cover plate in the beam overwrites.
Only frame objects that are assigned a material whose property data specifies “Steel” as the type
of design can be designed as composite beams.
Only frame objects whose line type is "Beam" can be designed as composite beams. This means
the frame objects must lie in a horizontal plane, or in a plane with an inclination that is within
the maximum inclination from horizontal for beams and floors tolerance defined in the model.
Furthermore, the local axis 2 angle of the frame object must be zero, which means its local axes
1 and 2 are in the same vertical plane. You can check the local axis 2 angle of any beam by right
clicking on it and then selecting the Geometry tab of the Beam Information form.
Only frame objects spanning between two supports or frame objects representing cantilevers
can be designed as composite beams. Composite beams cannot be modeled using multiple,
adjacent frame objects between supports for a single composite beam.
Cantilevers and their backspans can be modeled as a single object when the cantilever is a beam
overhang extending over a supporting girder, but they should be modeled as two separate
objects when the cantilever is moment-connected to its backspan.
At least one side of the beam objects must support a floor object whose section is
specified as a deck section (not a slab or a wall section). The deck section can be filled,
unfilled or it can be a solid slab. When the deck is unfilled, the beam will still go
through the composite beam design procedure, which will design it as a non-composite
beam.
The beam objects must not frame continuously into a column or a brace. Both ends of
the objects must be pinned for major axis bending (bending about the local 3 axis). Note
that the assembly of a column and a beam moment connected to it at one end and
simply supported at the other makes an elementary frame capable of resisting lateral
forces.
You can change the design procedure for one or more steel beam objects from steel frame design to
composite beam design by selecting them, selecting the Design menu > Overwrite Frame Design
Procedure command, and choosing composite beam design. This change is successful only if the
beam objects meet the hard requirements above. For example, if you select a steel beam with a
tube section and try to change its design procedure to composite beam design, the change will
not happen. Also, the floor object will not provide any composite action. Floor objects that are
intended to provide composite action should be defined as deck sections, which include an
option to model solid slabs.
You can set the design procedure of a steel beam object that supports a floor object with a slab
section instead of a deck section. If you do, you should also set the modeling type of the floor
object section to membrane, to ensure that the distributed loads applied on the floor object result
in distributed line loads on the beam.
When ETABS performs the composite beam design of a non-composite beam that does not
support any deck, it computes the flexural capacity of the beam based on its unbraced length but
it does not account for axial forces or any out-of-plane bending, and it does not check the
adequacy of slender sections. Therefore, the design results for some beams will be different
when they are designed with the steel frame design procedure.
This chapter provides an overview of how ETABS determines the values of the various section
properties of the steel beam acting alone and evaluates its shear and bending resistance when
designing a composite beam per BS5950. ETABS designs the steel beam per BS5950-1:2000
Structural use of steelwork in building - Part 1: Code of practice for design - Rolled and welded
sections– referred to as BS5950-1 henceforth. The subject is also covered in the Steel Frame
Design Manual AISC ASD-1989, AISC LRFD-1993 and BS 5950-2000 For ETABS, to which
you are referred for additional information.
• retrieves its section properties from the properties tables if the section is a catalog
section and the beam overwrites do not specify the provision of a cover plate,
• computes the section properties otherwise.
• The limiting width to thickness, d/t, for webs is obtained from BS5950-3 Table 2
• A steel compression flange restrained by effective attachment to a concrete slab by
shear connectors in accordance with BS5950-3 Section 5.4, which ETABS assumes is
always the case – even when the shear connectors distribution is user-specified – can be
assumed to be class 1.
ETABS deems class 4 sections not acceptable and does not do any further checks of these.
Per BS5950-3 Section 4.5.3, ETABS designs beams with compression flanges in class 1 or 2
and webs in class 3 based on their plastic moment capacity computed with an effective web area
reduced as shown in BS5950-3 Figure 2. Per BS5950-3 Section 4.5.3, ETABS designs beams
with compression flanges in class 3 based on their elastic moment capacity.
Dt
if the section is a rolled section, and
Av 2 = (BS 5950-1 4.2.3)
( D − Ttop − Tbot ) t if the section is a welded section,
where:
Per BS 5950-1 Section 4.2, the moment capacity of of a fully braced beam with a class 3 I or
channel section, Ms, is equal to:
• under construction conditions, the deck restrains the top flange of the beam only if it is
transverse to it
• under service conditions, the deck always restrains the top flange of the beam if it is
filled, and if it is not filled, only restrains the top of the beam if it is transverse to it.
Under both construction and service conditions, ETABS considers that the top
and bottom flange of a beam are braced at any joint where another beam
Beam Considered
frames into it at an angle greater than 30 degrees, as depicted in the sketch to Br
ac
ing
the right. You need to detail the connection so as to ensure that the flanges are Be
adequately braced, or else redefine the beam brace points in the beam am
π2 E
λL0 = 0.4 (BS 5950-1 B2.2)
py
where:
1
4
4 S x γ
2
I
γ= 1 − y . (BS 5950-1 B2.3)
Ix
1
ν= 0.25
(BS 5950-1 B2.3)
1 + 0.05 ( λ / x ) 2
λ =LE / ry (BS 5950-1 4.3.6.7)
pE p y
pb = (BS 5950-1 B2.1)
φ LT + (φ2LT − pE p y )0.5
where:
( π2 E / λ 2LT )
pE = (BS 5950-1 B2.1)
p + (ηLT + 1) PE
φ LT =y (BS 5950-1 B2.1)
2
and the Perry coefficient, ηLT, for rolled and welded sections is computed as follows:
This chapter explains how ETABS computes the transformed moment of inertia, transformed
section modulus, and plastic moment capacities of composite beams. These depend on the adjacent
deck properties and effective slab width so the determination of these is presented first.
4.1.1 Location where Deck Properties and Slab Width are checked
In order to compute the section properties and plastic resistance moment of a composite beam,
ETABS only computes the effective slab width and retrieves the adjacent deck properties along
the middle 70% of the beam. This 70% ratio is derived based on two assumptions:
• The plastic resistance moment of the composite beam is approximately twice that of the
steel beam alone.
• The steel beam alone is capable of resisting the entire moment in the beam for the last
15% of the beam length at each end of the beam. Note that for a uniformly loaded
beam, the moment drops off to half of the maximum moment or less in the last 15% of
the beam.
• You can redefine this default “middle range” of 70% in the design preferences, as
explained in Appendix A.
While it accounts for different types of deck and different deck orientations on the two sides of
a beam, ETABS only accounts for a single set of deck properties and a single deck orientation
on each side.
When multiple deck types or deck directions occur within the middle range on the same side of a
beam, ETABS decides which single deck section and direction to use on that side of the beam based
on the following steps:
• ETABS computes the product of tc • f cd for each deck where tc is the depth of the
concrete above the metal deck and f c′ is the concrete slab compressive strength. It uses
the deck section that has the smallest value of tc • f cd in the calculations for the beam.
• If two or more deck sections have the same value of tc • f cd but the deck spans in
different directions, ETABS uses the deck section that spans perpendicular to the beam.
• If two or more deck sections span in the same direction and have the same value of tc •
f cd ETABS uses the deck section with the smaller tc value.
• If two or more deck sections span in the same direction and have the same values of tc
and f cd ETABS uses the first defined deck section.
You can specify the deck properties and deck orientation on each side of a beam as beam
overwrites, as explained in Appendix B.
• half the smallest distance from the beam centerline to the nearest approximately parallel
beam
• the smallest distance from the beam centerline to the nearest slab edge
• the width b of the beam if the deck is a filled deck perpendicular to the beam
For a simply supported beam, Lx is equal to span of the beam measured the center of support to
center of support. For a moment connected beam, the location of the points of zero moment will
vary with the load combinations and Lx, Be and the composite properties of the beam are
evaluated separately for each load combination under consideration.
You can specify the values of be on the two sides of a beam, be-left and beright, as beam overwrites
as explained in Appendix B.
Plan C in Figure 4-2 shows a special case where two diagonal beams frame into Beam C at the
same point. In this special case, ETABS assumes that the effective width of the slab on the side
of the beam where the two diagonals exist is zero. You may change this in the beam overwrites.
ETABS assumes the zero effective width because, although it is checking the effective width
for Beam C, it is unable to determine whether a slab is actually between the two diagonal
beams.
LV
xD * LD
Beam D
Plan D
Figure 4-3 - Example of the Effect of Openings on Composite Beam Effective Width
Assume again that the effective width of this beam is controlled by the distance to the centerline
of the adjacent beam, and assume that ETABS checks the effective width of the slab over the
default center 70% of the Beam D length. If the width of the opening, xD • LD is less than
0.15LD, ETABS bases the effective width of the concrete slab on the distance to the adjacent
beams. On the other hand, if xD • LD exceeds 0.15LD, ETABS assumes the effective concrete
slab width for Beam D to be zero; that is, it assumes a non-composite beam.
Per BS5950-3 Section 4.1, the effective modular ratio, αe, used to evaluate the contributions of
the concrete components to the transformed moment of inertia is equal to:
where:
Because the value of αe can vary with the load combination, ETABS computes the value of the
transformed moment of inertia Ip separately for each load combination. Ip is also evaluated
separately when vibrations are evaluated because concrete is then considered effective in both
tension and compression and a special value of the modular ratio is used as explained in
Vibration Checks.
The concrete in the metal deck ribs is included in the composite moment of inertia and plastic
bending resistance calculations when the deck ribs are oriented parallel to the beam, and not
included otherwise. Note that the deck type and deck orientation may be different on the two
sides of the beam as described in Deck Properties and Effective Slab Width.
All calculations are done based on a “transformed section” of the beam, that is, the section
consisting of the steel section, including any cover plate, plus the “transformed areas” of the
concrete slab to the left and right of the beam. The transformed area of the concrete slab on one
side of the beam is defined as the area of the concrete slab on that side divided by αe. αe itself
may be different on the two sides of the beam if the densities of concrete are different.
ETABS first computes the location y of the elastic neutral axis, “ENA”, of the transformed
section. By definition of the ENA, when the beam is subject to positive bending such that the
flexural stresses remain in the elastic range, all the parts of the composite section located below
the ENA are in tension, and all the parts above it are in compression. When all the concrete is in
compression, or when concrete is considered effective in both tension and compression, the
ENA is located at the centroid of the transformed section. If concrete in tension is considered
not effective and there is some, the ENA is located at the centroid of the transformed section
obtained by considering the steel and only the parts of the concrete slab that are in compression.
ETABS measures y from the bottom of the steel section – without cover plate.
When the deck properties are the same on both sides of the beam, the location of the ENA can
be computed by checking whether it is located within the steel section, or within the deck ribs,
or within the deck cover. Because “within the deck ribs” or “within the deck cover” may be ill-
defined when there are different deck types on each side of the beam, an iterative algorithm is
used in which concrete in tension is removed and the location of the ENA is recomputed at each
iteration until no concrete in tension remains.
Once the location of the ENA is known, Ip is computed through a two-step process:
1. ETABS computes the moment of inertia relative to the bottom flange of the steel section,
Σ (A y
tr 1
2
), per the equations in the table below:
Concrete in
beff hl* wl hr* beff wl hl*3
metal deck d + hr − Atry1 Atry12
Sl α e 2 12 Sl α e
ribs, left side
Concrete in
beff hr* wr hr* beff wr hr*3
metal deck d + hr − Atry1 Atry12
Sr αe 2 12 Sr α e
ribs, right side
Steel section
including any Aa ybare Atry1 Atry12 Isteel
cover plate
Sums ΣA tr Σ (A y ) Σ (A y
tr 1 tr 1
2
) ΣI O
* *
In the above table, hr and tc have different meanings depending on whether Ip is computed for
beam deflection checks or for beam vibration checks:
*
• For strength and deflection checks, hr is the height of the metal deck ribs above the
ENA, if the deck ribs are parallel to the beam, and zero if they are perpendicular to it
*
• For vibration checks, the concrete in tension is considered effective and hr = hr if the
deck ribs are parallel to the beam, and zero if they are perpendicular to it
*
• For strength and deflection checks, tc is the thickness of the concrete slab that lies
*
above the ENA, zero if the ENA is above the concrete slab, tc = 0
*
• For vibration checks, tc is the thickness of the concrete slab
* *
Note that the value of hr and tc can be different on the left and right sides of the beam.
2. Once Σ (A y tr 1
2
) is known, Ip is computed by application of the parallel axis theorem:
∑A ∑ I − (∑ A ) y
2 2
I p= tr y1 + O tr
Ip
Zs = (equivalent to BS5950-3 Eqn. B4.1)
y + tcp
The value of the elastic section modulus for the concrete flange of the fully composite section
Zp, is derived from the value of Ip and y :
αe I p
Zp = (equivalent to BS5950-3 Eqn. B4.1)
D + DS − y
where D is the depth of the steel section, not counting any cover plate, and DS is the total depth
of the deck.
Na
δ=
δ c + 0.5(1 − )(δ s − δ c ) if the beam is shored
Np
Na
δ=
δ c + 0.3(1 − )(δ s − δ c ) if the beam is not shored
Np
where:
δc is the deflection of a composite beam with full shear connection for the same loading
Na is the actual number of shear connectors between the location of the maximum
moment and the nearest point of zero moment
Np is the number of shear connectors between the location of the maximum moment and
the nearest point of zero moment required to develop full composite action
A corresponding moment of inertia, Ieff, for the partially composite beam is computed as
follows:
δc
I eff = I if the beam is shored
δ g
δ c − δ s ,dead
I eff = I if the beam is not shored.
δ − δ s ,dead g
I eff − I x
Z s −eff =
Zx + ( Zs − Z x )
Ic − I x
Note that the value of Z s −eff is only used when checking the flexural strength of a beam with a
class 3 web. The elastic stresses check presented in Elastic Stresses Check is based on the
values of Zs and Zp.
• the concrete is stressed to 0.45 f cu over the full depth of concrete on the compression
side of the plastic neutral axis
• the steel in the steel section is stressed to its design yield strength, p y, in tension or
compression. Also, note that per BS5950-3 Section 3.1, the value of py is capped at 355
MPa
• the contribution of the steel in part of the web defined in BS5950-3 Section 4.5.3 is
neglected if the web of the section is class 3
• the contribution of the steel reinforcement can be neglected.
A typical plastic stress distribution is shown in the figure below. The compression force in the
concrete slab, C, is the smallest of:
=Rc 0.45( f cu −left Ac −left + f cu − right Ac − right ) (equivalent to BS5950-31 Eqn. B2.1)
being checked and the nearest point of zero moment to either side
When computing Rc, ETABS computes separately the maximum compressive forces that can be
developed by the concrete in the slab on the left side of the beam and on the right side of the
When computing Rs, ETABS includes the contribution of the bottom flange cover plate if there
is one.
When computing Rq, ETABS conservatively counts the shear studs acting at the beam station
being checked instead of those acting at the point of maximum positive moment so as to satisfy
the requirements of BS5950-3 Section 5.4.5.2.
α1 f c′
CConc
a
CSteel
Fy
Plastic neutral axis (PNA)
TSteel
Fy
1. ETABS first computes the depth, a, of the compression block in the slab and the distance,
d1, from its centroid to the top of the steel section.
a is such that if the top of the highest slab on the left and right sides of the beam is offset by
a, the compressive force developed by the concrete located above the resulting plane is
equal to Nc.
If the deck properties are the same on both sides of the beam, and the slab is a solid slab, or
there is deck and it is perpendicular to the beam on both sides, then:
Rc
a=
0.45 fu beff
Because the computation is not as straightforward when the deck properties differ on the
two sides of the beam, or when the concrete in the deck rib contributes to the compression
force, ETABS uses an iterative algorithm in which the value of a is adjusted until the exact
answer is found.
2. ETABS computes the location of the plastic neutral axis, PNA, in the steel section, and the
distance, d2, from the centroid of the compression force in the steel section to the top of the
steel section. When C is equal to Rs the steel section is completely in tension, the PNA is at
the top of the steel section and d2 is zero.
This chapter explains how ETABS checks the shear and bending resistance of the beams it
designs under construction conditions and service conditions.
Σ Σ
1.4 ( WDL) + 1.6 ( CL) (BS5950-1 Section 2.2 Table 2)
where:
ΣWDL = the sum of all wet dead load (WDL) load cases defined for the model. Note
that if a load case is simply defined as dead load, it is considered a WDL load
case.
ΣCL = the sum of all construction load (CL) load cases defined for the model. Note
that you need to explicitly define these.
Strength Checks 27
Composite Beam Design BS 5950-3.1:1990 Strength Checks
Σ
1.4 ( WDL + ΣSDL) (BS5950-1 Section 2.2 Table 2)
Σ
1.4 ( WDL + ΣSDL) + 1.6 (ΣLL + ΣRLL) (BS5950-1 Section 2.2 Table 2)
where:
ΣLL = the sum of all live load (LL) load cases defined for the model.
ΣRLL = the sum of all reducible live load (RLL) load cases defined for the model.
ΣSDL = the sum of all superimposed dead load (SDL) load cases defined for the model.
and the remainder of the terms are as defined previously.
Fv
≤ 1.0
Pv
where:
Fv = The required shear strength; that is, the applied factored vertical shear force
Pv = Shear capacity for the vertical shear, computed as explained in Plastic Resistance to
Vertical Shear of Steel Cross-Sections.
M
≤ 1.0
min( M s , M b / mLT )
where:
• Ms is the fully braced moment capacity of the section computed as explained in Fully
Braced Moment Capacity of Steel Cross-Sections.
• mLT is the equivalent uniform moment factor for lateral-torsional buckling and is
conservatively taken as 1.0 by ETABS
Ms and Mb are computed anew for each load combination at each location based on the
corresponding forces in the beam and unbraced length of the beam.
Note that the above check does not take into account any axial force or out-of-plane bending
that may occur in the beam.
−M
≤ 1.0
min( M s , M b / mLT )
where Ms and Mb are again computed anew for each load combination at each location based on
the corresponding forces in the beam and unbraced length of the beam
M
≤ 1.0
Mc
where:
Per BS5950-3 Sections 4.5.3 and 4.5.4, the value of Mc depends on whether or not the beam is
designed as composite and the classification of its section flanges:
• If the beam is composite and its section flanges are class 1 or 2, Mc is equal to the plastic
moment capacity of the composite section which is computed as explained in Plastic
Moment Capacity of a Composite Cross-Section. Because the value of Mc depends on the
value of the shear force Fv, Mc is computed anew for each load combination at each
location.
• If the beam is composite and its section flanges are class 3, Mc is equal to the elastic
moment capacity of the composite section which is equal to p y Z s −eff where Zs-eff is
computed as explained in Effective Section Modulus for Partial Composite Connection.
• If the beam is non-composite, Mc is the smallest of Ms and Mb which are computed anew
for each load combination at each location based on the corresponding forces in the beam
and unbraced length of the beam.
• there are not enough shear connectors on it to achieve the BS5950-3-specified or user-
specified minimum percentage of composite action.
Also, you can specify in the beam overwrites if ETABS is to design a beam as non-composite
without connectors, non-composite with connectors, composite as required, or always
composite.
In the case of a moment-connected beam supported at both ends, ETABS makes an allowance
for pattern loading in which only a fraction of the live load is present on the adjacent spans,
since this will increase the positive bending of the beam.
M
When the highest ratio occurs at a beam station other than the one where the maximum
Mc
positive bending moment occurs, the percentages of composite action attained based on the
shear stud distribution and resulting composite plastic moment capacities are reported for both
stations in the output.
Note that the above check does not take into account any axial force or out-of-plane bending
that may occur in the beam.
If a beam is not shored during construction, its design must satisfy for all deflection load
combinations the following two equations at the location of maximum positive bending:
M
≤ p y and
Zs
M
≤ 0.5 f cu
Zp
where:
Z = Elastic section modulus of the steel section with respect to its bottom flange
Zs = Elastic section modulus of the fully composite section for the bottom flange
of the steel member, computed as explained in Transformed Elastic Section
Modulus
Zp = Elastic section modulus of the fully composite section for the concrete
flange, computed as explained in Transformed Elastic Section Modulus
This chapter explains how ETABS computes and checks the deflections of the composite beams
it designs.
For the purpose of composite beam design, in the case of a beam supported at both ends, beam
deflections are measured from the straight line joining the two supports as illustrated below:
Figure 6-1 Deflection Results Reported by the Composite Beam Design Postprocessor
In the case of cantilever beams, the displacement is measured at the free end relative to the
beam support. For loads other than live loads, the deflection includes the tilt caused by the
rotation of the supported end, taken as equal to the rotation of the point object at the fixed end
computed during analysis with two possible adjustments:
• a reduction of the analysis rotation if the backspan is composite to account for the
increased moment of inertia of the composite section compared to that of the analysis
steel section (incidentally, when designing several selected beams, ETABS identifies
and designs the backspans first)
Deflection Checks 33
Composite Beam Design BS 5950-3.1:1990 Deflection Checks
• a downwards rotation to account for the initial curvature of the backspan if it has a
camber.
For live loads, the tilt caused by the rotation of the supported end is ignored when the cantilever
is designed as live loads may not always be present on nearby beams.
The automatically created design load combination for computing deflections is given by the
following equation:
ΣWDL + ΣSDL + ΣLL + ΣRLL (AISC L1, ASCE 2.4.1, C.1.1, C.2)
where all of the terms are as described in Design Load Combinations. Note that all the load
factors for this serviceability check are 1.0. Dead load deflections are the dead load component
of the deflections computed for this load combination. Likewise, superimposed dead load are
the superimposed dead load component of the deflections computed for it, and live load
deflections are the sum of the unreducible live load and reducible live load components of the
deflections computed for it.
As explained in Elastic Stresses Check, ETABS always checks that the flexural stresses remain
in the elastic range under un-factored service loads.
• the moment of inertia of the steel section (including any cover plate) Is, if the beam is
non-composite or is a cantilever beam
• the effective moment of inertia of the beam, Ieff, otherwise – see Effective Moment of
Inertia for Partial Composite Connection for information on Ieff
and does not check the computed value against any limit, but retrieves it later, to compute the
total beam deflection.
If a beam is not shored, ETABS computes its dead load deflection based on Is. If the design
preferences or the beam overwrites specify a maximum limit for dead load deflection, ETABS
checks that the dead load deflection is less.
6.3 Camber
If you have specified a specific camber during interactive beam design or in the beam
overwrites, ETABS uses that camber.
Otherwise, it computes a camber equal to 80% of the dead load deflection, rounded down to the
Camber 34
Composite Beam Design BS 5950-3.1:1990 Deflection Checks
nearest beam camber increment if the beam and its structural steel section meet the following
criteria:
If that camber is more than the maximum camber specified in the design preferences, the
maximum camber is used.
All the numbers used in the above criteria, as well as the 80% ratio, can be changed in the
design preferences. The next to last three criteria implement recommendations published by
AISC in the Specifying Camber Steelwise article of Modern Steel Construction, July 2006.
In the case of a moment-connected beam supported at both ends, ETABS makes an allowance
for pattern loading in which only a fraction of the live load is present on the adjacent spans
since this will increase the estimated deflection of the beam. Also, note that Ieff is used along the
entire length of the beam, even in the areas of negative bending.
If the design preferences or the beam overwrites specify a maximum limit for post-composite
deflection, the sum of the superimposed dead load and live load deflections is checked against
that limit.
If the design preferences or the beam overwrites specify a maximum limit for live load
deflection, ETABS checks that the live load deflection is less.
Each cantilever deflection is computed assuming the same section for the cantilever and the
backspan and as explained in Composite Beam Deflections for loads other than live loads.
The cantilever live load deflection is taken as equal to its tilt, i.e., it is computed assuming no
live load on the cantilever, and with a rotation at the supported end corresponding to the rotation
induced by a fraction the design live load on the backspan. The value of that fraction is the
Pattern Live Load Factor specified in the Beam Tab of the Composite Beam Preferences form.
This chapter explains how ETABS determines the total number of shear connectors required to
satisfy the design requirements on a composite beam, and their distribution.
It first introduces the concept of “beam segments”, along with the maximum workable and
minimum required numbers of shear connectors on any beam segment based on the minimum
and maximum spacing requirements specified in the design preferences.
Next, it explains how shear connectors are distributed along the beam segments to satisfy design
requirements.
Finally, it explains how composite beams are designed when their shear connector distribution
is user-specified.
7.1 Beam Segments and their Maximum and Minimum Numbers of Studs
• the physical end of the beam top flange, which takes into account the physical
dimensions of the frame object or wall object supporting the beam, plus a half inch gap,
• a connection to another beam that frames into or sits on the beam being considered,
• the physical end of the concrete slab on top of the beam.
Figure 7-1 shows some examples of beam segments. The figure uses the following notation:
Shear Connectors 37
Composite Beam Design BS 5950-3.1:1990 Shear Connectors
LCBS
LCBS
End of
slab
LCBS
The number of deck ribs itself is computed by dividing the segment length, LCB, by the deck rib
spacing and rounding the number down. When the deck on the left and the deck on the right
have a different rib spacing, the widest one is used.
The maximum number of shear connectors that can be placed within one rib is computed based
on the beam flange width, the minimum transversal shear connector spacing specified in the
design preferences, and a side cover requirement of 25 mm. or one connector diameter,
whichever is larger, as illustrated in the sketch below. If you want, you can specify a different
maximum number of connectors that can be placed within one rib in the beam overwrites.
• there is a deck on one side only of the beam and it is a solid slab type or it is parallel to
the beam
• or there are decks on both sides of the beam and both decks are a solid slab type or are
parallel to the beam
shear connectors can be placed anywhere on the flange of the beam. (This assumes that the deck
is split over the flange of the beam if necessary.)
The maximum number of shear connectors that can be placed in a single row along a segment is
computed by dividing the segment length, LCB, by the minimum longitudinal shear connector
spacing specified in the design preferences and rounding the number down.
The maximum number of rows of connectors on the beam is computed based on the beam
flange width, the minimum transversal shear connector spacing specified in the design
preferences, and a side cover requirement of 25 mm or one connector diameter, whichever is
larger, as illustrated in the sketch above. Again, the maximum number of rows of connectors
that can be placed on the beam can be specified in the beam overwrites.
If the deck on the left side or the deck on the right side, or both of them, has or have ribs and is
or are perpendicular to the beam, shear connectors must be placed within the deck ribs and the
maximum shear connector spacing is rounded down to the nearest multiple of the rib spacing.
When the deck on the left and the deck on the right have a different rib spacing, the widest one
is used.
The shear capacity of a headed stud connector, Qp, depends on whether it is in a solid slab, in a
deck with ribs parallel to the supporting beam, or in a deck with ribs transverse to the
supporting beams. In all cases, that shear capacity is a function of the characteristic resistance,
Qk, of the connector.
ETABS does not rely on composite action when checking the negative bending strength of
beams and, when checking their positive bending strength and deflection, does not count
connectors located in areas of negative bending so the equations below only apply to connectors
located in areas of positive bending.
The detrimental effect of eccentric placement of studs on the rib and the beneficial effect of
staggered placement of studs are not considered in ETABS.
7.2.3 Headed Stud Connectors in Filled Decks with Ribs Transverse to the Beam
The design shear resistance of a single headed stud connector embedded in a filled deck with its
ribs transverse to the supporting beam depends on the geometry of the deck ribs, and in
particular on whether or not they are re-entrant — i.e., they are narrower at their top.
If the deck ribs are re-entrant, the design shear resistance of the stud is taken as its capacity in a
solid slab multiplied by a reduction factor k equal to:
b h
0.85 r s − 1 ≤ 1 if N R ≥ 1,
Dp Dp
k = (BS5950-3 5.4.7.2)
br hs
0.6 D D − 1 ≤ 0.8 if N R ≥ 2,
p p
where:
b h
0.63 r s − 1 ≤ 0.82 if N R ≥ 1,
Dp Dp
k = (BS5950-3 5.4.7.2)
br hs
0.34 D D − 1 ≤ 0.45 if N R ≥ 2,
p p
Note that when there are two studs per rib, the design shear resistance of these studs is nearly
halved when the ribs are open instead of re-entrant.
7.2.4 Headed Stud Connectors in Filled Decks with Ribs Parallel to the Beam
The design shear resistance of a single headed stud connector embedded in a filled deck with its
ribs running parallel to the supporting beam is taken as its capacity in a solid slab multiplied by
a reduction factor k equal to:
br
1.0 if
Dp
≥ 1.5, and
k =
0.6 br hs br
− 1 ≤ 1.0 if < 1.5,
Dp
Dp Dp
(BS 5950 4.4.7.3)
Na 355
≥ 1− (0.80 − 0.03L) ≥ 0.4 when L ≤ 25 m
p
(BS5950-3 5.5.2.2(a))
Np y
Na
≥ 1 when L > 25 m (BS5950-3 5.5.2.2(a))
NP
• For beams with a steel section having a bottom flange with an area equal to three times
the area of the top flange:
Na 355
≥ 1− (0.33 − 0.02 L) ≥ 0.4 when L ≤ 25 m
Np p (BS5950-3 5.5.2.2(b))
y
Na
≥ 1 when L > 25 m (BS5950-3 5.5.2.2(b))
NP
• For beams with a steel section having a bottom flange with an area exceeding the area
of the top flange but less than three times that area, the minimum percentage of
composite action is obtained by linear interpolation from the above values.
In the absence of specific equations for shored beams, ETABS uses these minimum values for
both shored and unshored construction.
You may specify a higher value of the minimum percentage of composite action in the design
preferences, and the value you specify will be used provided it is greater than the value
computed per the equations above. You may specify a different value of the minimum
percentage of composite action in the beam overwrites, and the value you specify there will be
used instead of the value computed above.
If the strength and stiffness of the structural steel section are adequate without composite action,
and you have not specified always composite in the beam overwrites, a minimum number of
shear connectors are placed.
Otherwise, ETABS determines the optimal number of shear connectors through an iterative
Also, the investigated percentage of composite action cannot exceed the maximum percentage
of composite action specified in the design preferences or beam overwrites.
For a given percentage of composite action, ETABS computes the corresponding target
horizontal shear force Nc,1 to be provided by the shear connectors between the location of the
maximum bending moment and the nearest point of zero-moment for each load combination.
If there are point loads on the beam, ETABS also computes, for each point load location and
each load combination, a target horizontal shear force Nc2 to be provided by the shear
connectors between the location of the point load and the nearest point of zero-moment per the
following equation:
M − Ms
N 2 = N1
Mc − Ms
where:
The design load combinations are then sorted in order of decreasing shear connector densities.
The shear connector density is the ratio of the target horizontal shear force to the corresponding
distance between the nearest point of zero moment and the location at which the shear force was
computed.
The shear connectors are then distributed on the beam segments. ETABS first places the
minimum number required to satisfy maximum spacing requirements on all the segments. Then,
starting with the design load combination with the greatest shear connector requirement, and
continuing with the following load combinations, it checks that, at each of the locations where a
shear force has been computed, there are enough shear connectors on the segments to develop
that shear force. If there are not enough, the number of shear connectors on the segments is
progressively increased, starting with the segments closest to the ends of the beam, until there
are enough shear connectors.
When you specify the shear connector distribution on a beam, ETABS computes the number of
rows of shear connectors along the beam is computed based on the deck type and the deck
orientation relative to the beam as explained above. This number of rows determines the
number of shear connectors per row and the individual capacities Qp of the shear connectors.
ETABS checks the strength and deflection of the beam as explained in Strength Checks and
Deflection Checks — with, in particular, Mc computed for each station being checked based on
the number of shear connectors acting at that station.
Shear connector minimum spacing requirements are NOT checked for user-defined shear
connector distributions.
By default, ETABS does not check beam vibration acceptability when designing composite
beams per BS5950-3, but you can instruct it to do so by:
• setting the Consider Frequency option to Yes in the design preferences, in which case
ETABS checks that the natural frequencies of the beams is more than a minimum value
you specify, and/or
• setting the Consider Murray Damping option to Yes in the design preferences, in which
case ETABS checks beam vibration acceptability per the “Murray minimum damping”
criterion described in the Building Floor Vibrations article written by Thomas Murray
and published in the 1991 issue of the Engineering Journal of the American Institute of
Steel Construction – referred to as Murray henceforth.
The evaluation of these criteria depends on the value of the beam fundamental natural vibration
frequency, and in the case of the Murray minimum damping criterion, on the value of the initial
displacement amplitude of the floor system resulting from a heel-drop impact. This Chapter first
explains how the natural frequency and initial displacement amplitude are computed, and then
explains how the minimum frequency and Murray minimum damping criteria are evaluated.
g E I tr
f = Kf (Murray Eqn. A.1)
W L3
where:
Vibration Checks 46
Composite Beam Design BS 5950-3.1:1990 Vibration Checks
Itr = Transformed section moment of inertia for the composite beam calculated
assuming full (100%) composite connection, regardless of the number of shear
connectors on the beam, inclusion of the concrete in tension, and using a value
of Ec equal to 1.35 times the value of Ec specified in the material properties.
W = Total load supported by the beam. This is calculated as the sum of all of the
dead load and superimposed dead load supported by the beam, plus a
percentage of all of the live load and reducible live load supported by the beam.
That percentage is percentage of the live load expected to be a sustained load.
Its default value is 25% but you can specify different percentages in the
Composite Beam Design Preferences.
L = Center-of-support to center-of-support span of the beam
1.6
L H
1.4
gEI w
f = Kc
WL3
1.2
Frequency Coefficient, Kf
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4
Cantilever / Backspan Ratio, H/L
Figure 8-1 Kf Coefficient for an Overhanging Beam for Use in the Preceding Equation
Asb
A0 = (Murray Eqn. A2)
N eff
where:
Asb = Initial displacement amplitude of a single beam resulting from a heel drop
impact.
Neff = Effective number of beams resisting the heel drop impact
1
=t0 tan -1 (0.1π f )
πf
P0 L3
Asb = (0.1 − t0 ) , if t0 ≤ 0.05 sec
2.4 Es I tr
P0 L3 1
=Asb * * VF , if t0 > 0.05 sec
2.4 Es I tr 2πf
where:
When calculating Neff using the following equation, ETABS does not check or consider the
number of parallel, equally spaced identical beams.
The beam spacing used in the equation is user input in the composite beam overwrites.
If a beam has a deck on one side only, or not at all, the value of Neff is always set to 1.0.
Otherwise:
3
s L4 L
2.967 − 0.05776 b
N eff = + 2.556 *10
−8
+ 0.00010
d
avg I tr sb
where:
where:
f ≤ f min
where fmin is a frequency you can specify in the design preferences and whose default value is
otherwise 8 cycles/second.
where:
D = Damping ratio percentage, the amount of inherent damping in the floor system.
Its default value is 4%, but you can specify a different percentage in the design
preferences.
A0 = maximum initial amplitude of the floor system resulting from a heel-drop
impact, measured in inches.
The composite beam design preferences are assignments that apply to all the composite beams
in a model. You can review and modify their values with the Design > Composite Beam
Design > View/Revise Preferences... The command displays the Composite Beam Design
Preferences form, which features seven tabs:
• Beam tab
• Shear Studs tab
• Camber tab
• Deflection tab
• Vibration tab
• Prices tab
Design Preferences 51
Composite Beam Design BS 5950-3.1:1990 Vibration Checks
Camber Tab 53
Composite Beam Design BS 5950-3.1:1990 Vibration Checks
Deflection Tab 54
Composite Beam Design BS 5950-3.1:1990 Vibration Checks
Vibration Tab 55
Composite Beam Design BS 5950-3.1:1990 Vibration Checks
Prices Tab 56
Appendix B. Beam Overwrites
The composite beam overwrites are assignments that apply only to their target beam objects.
You can review and modify their values for selected beams with the Design > Composite
Beam Design > View/Revise Overwrites... The command displays the Composite Beam
Design Overwrites form, which features seven tabs:
• Beam tab
• Bracing (C) tab
• Bracing (S) tab
• Deck tab
• Shear Studs tab
• Deflection tab
• Vibration tab
Beam Overwrites 57
Composite Beam Design BS 5950-3.1:1990 Vibration Checks
Beam Tab 58
Composite Beam Design BS 5950-3.1:1990 Vibration Checks
Table B-2a: Initial Composite Beam Overwrite Items on the Bracing(C) and (S) Tabs
Item Possible Default Value Description
Values
Modification factor accounting for effects
of moment distribution used to compute
C1 factor ≥0 1.0
the buckling resistance moment of the steel
beam.
Program This item defines how the unbraced
calculated, lengths are determined for buckling about
Unbraced Length bracing Program the beam local 2-axis. They are program
Lb Method specified or calculated calculated, based on user-specified
length uniform and point bracing, or based on a
specified user-specified maximum unbraced length.
When you set the Unbraced Length Lb Method to Bracing Specified, you get to specify the two
items shown in Table B-2b:
Table B-2b: Additional Composite Beam Overwrite Items When the Bracing Condition
Is Specified as Bracing Specified
Item Possible Default Value Description
Values
The number of user-specified point brace
locations. Clicking on this item displays
No. Point Braces ≥0 0
the Point Braces form, where you specify
point braces.
The number of user-specified uniform
No. Uniform braces. Clicking on this item displays the
≥0 0
Braces Uniform Braces form, where you specify
uniform braces.
When you set the Bracing Condition type to Length Specified, you get to specify the two items
shown in Table B2c:
Table B2c: Additional Composite Beam Overwrite Items When the Bracing Condition
Is Specified as Length Specified
Item Possible Default Value Description
Values
Absolute Length Yes/No No Toggle switch for whether the maximum
Lb? unbraced length is given as an absolute
length or a relative length.
Unbraced ≥ 0 and ≤ beam Length of Maximum unbraced length for buckling
Length Lb length beam about the beam local 2 axis.
Value
Unbraced ≥ 0 and ≤ 1.0 1.0 Maximum unbraced length ratio for
Length Lb Ratio buckling about the beam local 2 axis.
Specifying the maximum unbraced length as an absolute length means entering the actual
maximum unbraced length. Specifying the maximum unbraced length as a relative length means
entering the ratio of the maximum unbraced length to the length of the beam. This ratio can
range from 0 to 1, inclusive.
Deck Tab 60
Composite Beam Design BS 5950-3.1:1990 Vibration Checks
Program
Deck ID Right Program Toggle specifying how the Deck ID on the
calculated or
Determination calculated right side of the beam is determined.
user-defined
Any defined
deck property Beam
Deck ID Right Deck ID on the right side of beam.
name or dependent
“None”
Deck Direction Program
Program Determines how the deck direction on the
Right calculated or
calculated right side of the beam is determined.
Determination user-defined
Span direction of the metal deck ribs on
Deck Direction Parallel, or Beam
the right side of beam relative to the span
Right perpendicular dependent
direction of beam
Program Toggle specifying how the effective width
b-eff right Program
calculated or of the concrete slab on the right side of the
Determination calculated
user-defined beam is determined
User-specified effective width of concrete
b-eff right ≥0 0
slab on the right side of the beam, beff right
Deck Tab 61
Composite Beam Design BS 5950-3.1:1990 Vibration Checks
Table B-4: Composite Beam Overwrite Items on the Shear Studs Tab
Item Possible Default Value Description
Values
Type of beam design. NC w studs is short
Composite as
for Non-composite with minimum shear
required, NC w
Composite as connectors. NC w/o studs is short for Non-
Beam Type studs, NC w/o
required composite without any shear connectors.
studs, or Force
Force Composite is short for always design
Composite
with composite action.
Minimum value of percent composite
connection applied to beams that require
Minimum PCC composite action to meet strength or
>0 40
(%) deflection design criteria. This percentage
also applies to beams for which "Always
Composite" is specified.
Maximum percent composite connection
Maximum PCC(%) >0 100
considered for the beam.
Toggle to indicate if a user-defined shear
User Pattern? Yes/No No
connector pattern is defined.
Uniform average spacing of shear
connectors along the beam. The actual
spacing depends on the number of shear
0, meaning no
connectors per row, which depends on the
Uniform user-specified
≥0 row spacing. The row spacing is controlled
Spacing shear
by the deck if it has ribs and they are
connectors
transverse to the beam, or by the minimum
longitudinal shear connector spacing set in
the Preferences.
Number of sections in which additional
uniformly spaced shear connectors are
0, meaning no specified. Clicking on this item displays
No. Additional
≥0 user-specified the Additional Sections form, where you
Sections
sections specify the section lengths and the number
of uniformly spaced shear connectors in
the sections.
Table B-4: Composite Beam Overwrite Items on the Shear Studs Tab
Item Possible Default Value Description
Values
Toggle for placement of shear connectors
Single in a single segment. To place connectors in
Yes/No No
Segment? a single segment with uniform spacing
throughout the beam, select Yes.
Max. Studs per Maximum number of shear connectors in a
>0 3
Row single row across the beam flange.
Shear capacity for a single shear stud.
Program
Qk ≥0 Specifying 0 in the overwrites means that
calculated
this value is program calculated.
The “Max Studs per Row” item indicates the maximum number of shear connectors that is
allowed in a row across the beam flange. For wider beams, the Min. Trans. Spacing item might
allow for more shear connectors across the beam flange but the Max Studs per Row item will
limit the number of connectors in any row.
Deflection Tab 63
Composite Beam Design BS 5950-3.1:1990 Vibration Checks
Deflection Tab 64
Composite Beam Design BS 5950-3.1:1990 Vibration Checks
Vibration Tab 65