IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering

PAPER • OPEN ACCESS

CFD Analysis of Supersonic flow performance around a scramjet

engines
To cite this article: Dr. M Satyanarayana Gupta and Muttangi Venuprasad 2018 IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 455 012027

View the article online for updates and enhancements.

This content was downloaded from IP address 191.101.137.140 on 20/12/2018 at 00:51

ICAAMM IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 455 (2018) 012027 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/455/1/012027

CFD Analysis of Supersonic flow performance around a

scramjet engines

Dr. M Satyanarayana Gupta* and Muttangi Venuprasad ¹

*Head of Department, Dept. of Aeronautical Engineering, MLR Institute of
Technology, Hyderabad-500043, India.

¹ M.Tech Scholor, Aerospace Engineering, Dept. of Aeronautical Engineering,

MLR Institute of Technology, Hyderabad-500043. India

Abstract. This paper talks about the optimal design outline and examination of a NASA X-43.
The X-43 was an unmanned test hypersonic air vehicle with numerous arranged scale varieties
intended to test different parts of hypersonic. Investigation is shown in relentless state 3D
computational liquid co mponents (CFD) at Mach 4.5 to Mach 9.0. In this method for
examination, Lift, Drag, Lift Coefficient (Cl) and Drag Coefficient (Cd) are measured and
taken a gander at isolated Mach numbers, Pressure structures and speed shapes are plotted and
the Turbulence zone is foreseen from streamline sees examination were analysed in CFD.
NASA and other groups are actively searching for ways to dramatically reduce the cost of
lifting objects into earth orbit, currently estimated at approximately $20,000 per kilogram. One
of the most promising prospects is the concept of an air breathing engine capable of propelling
an aircraft in the hypersonic (Mach 5+) range. A supersonic combustion ramjet or scramjet,
theoretically has the capability of reaching orbital velocit ies. The payload and economy
benefits of such an engine become readily apparent when one considers the weight of a typical
rocket-based space launch vehicle (like the Space Shuttle) is two thirds o xidizer.

Keywords: CFD, Cl, Cd, Mach, scramjet

1. Introduction
The objective of any association whose goal is to be space based and to accomplish orbital speed by its
rocket for the most reduced price. Typical turbofan engines in the present elite aero planes are not
expected for accomplishing orbital speed. There are some other jet engine concepts being without
using any kind of fan blades for compression but rather depending on the velocity of the flying vehicle
and geometry of engine's entry to pack the atmospheric air. The same is applicable to Ramjet concept
also but the fundamental issue in case of the ramjet is yet again in the form of outrageous temperatures
achieved packing as well as easing back supersonic wind stream to subsonic speeds in the combustor
area. The shuttle and launching vehicles should convey their private oxidizer together with them.
Much of the time, it exists fluid oxygen (LOX) or a dry synthetic oxidizer. The liquid and solid
oxidizers speak to 64% of normal take-off weight of 4.5 million pounds In like manner 66% of the 6.5
million pound Saturn V rocket was as liquid oxygen Damon 2001 due to the Space Shuttle is equipped
with an extraordinary payload [1, 4]. Rockets have demonstrated their capacity routinely all through
the most recent 40 years period to accomplish, as well as escape speed. Their issue exists in the price.
The minimum cost to lift articles to be situated the Long March rocket, pricing above $1600 per pound
of payload. Contemporary assessments of general payload taken a toll on behalf of the Space Shuttle
stands amongst $7000 and $8000 per pound. A later gauge redirects expenditures by roughly $20000

Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1
ICAAMM IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 455 (2018) 012027 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/455/1/012027

per kilogram [5]. There are a several reasons for the high cost associated with launching rockets into
low earth orbit. Producing liquid oxygen is a difficult and expensive process. Safely storing it in large
quantities, and for extended periods is also an expensive proposition. Valves and hoses of high
strength and durability are required to safely and reliably carry the liquid oxygen from storage tanks to
the engines in the launch vehicles [3]. Finally, all the extra weight in oxidizer requires much more fuel
in a much larger vehicle to escape earths’ gravitational pull. NASA’s Advanced Space Transportation
Office Program Manager describes their goal in the Project Plan for Breakthrough Propulsion Physics
to “reduce the cost of lifting objects to Low Earth Orbit by a factor of ten by the year 2010 and by an
additional factor of ten by the year 2025” [6].
.
2. Methodology
With a specific end goal to ascertain the weight appropriations on the aircraft, a CFD model of the
UAV was created. This was done essentially by model to ICEM CFD stage which is the pre-processor
for the stream examination.
ANSYS ICEM CFD: It is a prominent exclusive programming bundle utilized for CAD and cross
section era. It can make organized, unstructured, multi-piece, and half and half frameworks with
various cell geometries. ANSYS ICEM CFD is intended to work geometry as of now made utilizing
other devoted CAD bundles. Subsequently, the geometry demonstrating elements are essentially
intended to 'tidy up' a foreign CAD model. All things considered, there are some effective geometry
creation, altering and repair (manual and robotized) apparatuses accessible in ANSYS ICEM CFD
which help with landing at the cross section organize rapidly. Dissimilar to the idea of volume in
instruments like GAMBIT, ICEM CFD rather treats a gathering of surfaces which include a shut
locale as BODY. The accentuation in ICEM CFD to make a cross section is to have a 'water-tight'
geometry. It implies if there is a wellspring of water inside a locale, the water ought to be contained
and not spill out of the BODY. Aside from the standard focuses, bends, surface creation and altering
apparatuses, ANSYS ICEM CFD particularly has the ability to do assemble topology which evacuates
undesirable surfaces and after that you can see if there are any "gaps" in the locale of enthusiasm for
cross section.
Creating the GEOMETRY and FLOW DOMAIN: The ANSYS workbench stage gives better bi-
directional associations than all significant CAD frameworks, capable geometry change and
creation instruments with ANSYS Design modeler, propelled fitting advancements in ANSYS
coinciding, and simple move and customize exchange of information and results to share between
applications. This intelligent procedure is the primary pre-preparing stage. The goal is to deliver a
cross section for contribution to the material science pre-processor. Prior to a cross section can be
created, a shut model strong is needed. The geometry and lattice can be made in the Meshing
application network creation instruments.
MESHING: The workspace is checked for mistakes with 0.06 mm of resistance quality and
worldwide scale variable of 1.0. The UAV is fit at its driving edges like wing, fuselage, even and
vertical tail for fine surface lattice size of 2 and cross section scale component 0.1. And afterward
finish cross section of size 12 and lattice scale variable of 1.The extent of the stream area depends on
prior studies in which the space size was progressively expanded until there was no more a discernible
impact on the airplane's lift and drag. A limited volume and thickness cross section is produced
utilizing unstructured tetrahedral cells as a part of the zone nearly encompassing the flying machine, to
take into account the complexities of the geometry, alongside a ka leidoscopic limit layer network 6
cells thick on the airplane's wetted surface. Organized hexahedral cells are then used to characterize
the remaining stream space.
PARAMETRICAL STUDIES: The geometry is modelled using the Uni Graphics (UGNX).
This UG mode l is imported to ICEM CFD as shown in figure. Here the model is extended for fluid
domain. Different Mach numbers considered for CFD analysis are (M=4.5, 6, 7, 8, 9). Subsequently
acquired results at these conditions are taken into account for external flow analysis.
MESH DETAILS: The mesh type chosen is unstructured mesh consisting of tetrahedral elements.
The number of each element present in the mesh is given as total number of nodes as 230107, total

2
ICAAMM IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 455 (2018) 012027 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/455/1/012027

number of elements as 1192318, total number of tetrahedrons as 1192318, total number of faces as
109196. Figure 1 and 2 as shown as geometry and mesh.

Figure 1: Geometry Figure 2: Mesh

3. Results
Upon giving the boundary conditions at inlet, opening and wall; the turbulence model k epsilon used
as solver, the figure 3 shows the contour plots of stream lines.

Figure 3: Contour plots of stream lines

4. Conclusion
Hence the computational investigations of the streamlined qualities of Scramjet propulsion engines
were completed utilizing CFD. The fundamental aim of this examination was to assess the most proper
outline that will enhance the streamlined execution of Scramjet. NASA's hunt headed for reduce the
expenses of lifting mass to orbit by an order of extent would be completely acknowledged using
scramjet innovation technology. The HySHOT Program and the second trial of the Hyper-X
achievements are going to be the prominent future advances. From few decades, NASA is working on
the reduction of costs another order of magnitude before the year 2025, most probably this may not be
apprehended by scramjet technology.

References
[1] Peacock, Lindsay, 2000, Jane’s All the World’s Aircraft, Coulsdon, Surrey, (UK: Sentinel House)
[2] Rogers, R.C., Caproitti, D.P., and Guy R.W, 1998, Experimental Supersonic Combustion research
at NASA Langley, (AIAA), 2506.
[3] Beardsley, Tim,1999, The Way to Go in Space, Scientific American, 280
[4] Damon, Thomas D, 2001, Introduction to Space; (The Science of Spaceflight (3rd ed.). Malabar,
FL: Krieger)

3
ICAAMM IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 455 (2018) 012027 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/455/1/012027

[5] Hicks, John W. and Trippenese, Gary, 1997, NASA Hypersonic Plane Flight Development of
Technologies and capabilities for the 21st Century (Access to Space, Paris, France)
[6] Millis, Marc G, 2000, Project Plan for Breakthrough Propulsion Physics, Cleveland, OH, (Glenn
Research Center)