BLOG 2
BLOG 2
Mai topics covered: Gun show loophole discussion, universal background check & Gun
The documentary start with a mother-daughter mass shooting interview. The film cites
many laws and legislations available for gun control. Starting with the second amendment which
reads: A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the
people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed (Constitution of the United States ). This is
key as although the documentary seems conservative in the beginning it does focus only on key
issues about gun control, such as universal background checks and gun ownership rights.
The second part of the documentary opens the discussion to the gun show loophole
discussion, which is in fact the main focus of the documentary, universal background checks.
“The most recent legislative tussle centers on what advocates of gun control call the "gun show
loophole." Under federal law, licensed firearms dealers must run background checks on every
gun buyer. But at gun shows, which number 4,000 a year, private collectors can swap, trade and
sell without undertaking such checks. The National Rifle Association says that social science is
on its side: Few crimes can be linked to guns purchased at gun shows (Ambinder, 2002).”
Later the documentary takes a turn in a gun trade show, reporters interview NRA
members about their opinion on gun ownership. Some quoted less restriction but more
accountability. 74% of NRA Members support universal background checks. Their biggest fear
is that there would be a registry with names addresses and phone numbers which will in return
lead to personal prosecution of gun owners in case the U.S. Government wanted to seize or tax
guns in the future. The documentary again shed light on a few other massacres and the lack of
sold illegally, and later the individual that sold the gun admitted the wrongdoing and got 30 days
in prison. Admitting he thought the gun was going to be used to only rob a bank and no one
would get hurt. Some astonishing data is that civilian-owned guns increased from 200 million in
1994 to 300 million in 2004. From the inception of the Brady Act in 1994-2009, 1,925,000 gun
sales were denied through background checks. And 90% of denials resulted from prior criminal
activity.
Another example was Darion Richardson’s, On January 8, 2010, there was a robbery and
a shootout, and two little girls were killed. three homicides within three months, after a second
robbery that led to another homicide. The handgun was later found, once tracked to its original
owner. It was discovered that the gun was sold at a trade show no documentation was ever
drafted or filed. The perpetrator was never caught. 80% of violent crimes are done with illegal
Key points of the documentary, no gun cited in the documentary were purchased legally,
and every perpetrator was also not legally allowed to own a weapon (age, immigration status, or
crime record). If universal background check was in place those catastrophes could have been
avoided. Ultimately the documentary is divided by two tragedies, illegal gun-related murders and
(Docs, 2017)
This is a six-part documentary (each 15 minutes long) about America’s relationship with
firearms.
First episode AR-15 and America’s Obsession with assault weapons. Start with a
domestic violence example of gun violence, girlfriend, and three other people. Automatic
weapons have been banned in the past, with the support of the NRA. Automatic weapons ( >10
rounds ) were allowed when first developed and from 1994-2004 were banned in the United
States. Deaths from automatic weapons accounted for over 541 since it became legal again in
2004. NRA denies guns are the problem and shifts to blame video games trying to create a
connection between mass shootings and violent video games. Currently, 5 to 10 million AR –
Episode 2 Inside’s Trump’s era of guns: the NRA silencers and deregulation.
The description of what gun ownership feels like. The romanticism of assault riffle and
their perceived outcome of control, power, and money. NRA and Trump support, and its
detrimental setback of gun control. It’s calculated that the NNRA spent over 30 million dollars in
TV ads and financial support for Donald Trump's campaign. The reality was gun ownership was
failing throughout the years. NRA was founded to be an organization that was supposed to
protect hunters and gun owners but ended up being corrupted by the deep pockets of the gun
manufacturers. Later the episode again swifts the blame from guns to islamophobia as to another
I skipped this episode as it just stated factual data on gang-related shootings in Chicago.
Episode 4 – Arming the classroom: The fight over guns in America's schools
This was by far the most constructive episode in my opinion, through the deregulation of
silencers and other noise-canceling devices to new policies over gun-safe zones the episode
touched on many hot topics. This episode handled the topic of guns in schools and universities,
the director did a great job of exposing both sides. One example was a former Marine that is a
current teacher and is taking classes in tactical shooting, the other is a mass shooting victim of
the FSU massacre asking for guns to be banned from university campuses.
Episode 5 – Smart Guns are here: the battle over high-tech guns in america
This episode was interesting, providing a solution to many accidental shootings and
possible prevention of homicides everywhere. There are technologies that can be used with
existing guns to lock them as you would a phone. Three companies were interviewed that
designed patented technology to lock guns, which would only allow usage to its rightful owner.
Some use fingerprint technology other use RFIDs and other wearable technologies, and the
future of firearms are as smart as cellphones. It made a very interesting view of how guns can
This episode starts with Trump’s rally about guns in America. As quoted “ if the good
guys had guns this would’ve not happened!”. Are normal citizens the solution to gun violence in
America? That’s ultimately what this episode discusses. Used the example of someone that was
shot in the head and still believes owning a gun is safe. The document goes over a few states and
its decision on concealed carry and background checks. California which has the toughest gun
laws has seen a triple fold in concealed carry in the past few years. In contrast, the documentary
points out examples that cops tend to overreact when they see guns (legal or not) and a few other
In conclusion, the director exposed every point of gun relationship there is the fanatic, the
sportsmen, the female using for self-protection, the marine, the tactical fan. Not once was guns
labeled bad, but many solutions to gun violence and gun safety were provided. The documentary
was unbiased over gun laws and to my understanding pro-gun ownership (with safety protocols)
Not overly dramatic, or not abusive to the victims the documentary did a great job exposing the
Bibliography
Ambinder, M. J. (2002, February 28). Focusing on 'Gun Show Loophole' . Retrieved from ABC
News: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=121200&page=1
Constitution of the United States . (n.d.). Second Amendment . Retrieved from
https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-2/#:~:text=A%20well
%20regulated%20Militia%2C%20being,Arms%2C%20shall%20not%20be%20infringed.
Docs, A. (Director). (2017). Guns in America [Motion Picture].
Richie, J. (Director). (2016). 91% - A Film about Guns in America [Motion Picture].